Loss of intrahepatic HBsAg expression predicts sustained response to peginterferon and is reflected by pronounced serum HBsAg decline

There is a lack of knowledge regarding the effect of peginterferon (PEG‐IFN) on the expression of intrahepatic hepatitis B core and surface antigen (HBcAg and HBsAg) in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) and its relation with response to therapy. Fifty‐two HBeAg‐positive and 67 HBeAg‐negative CHB patients with paired liver biopsies taken at baseline and after 1 year of PEG‐IFN therapy were studied. After PEG‐IFN therapy, HBeAg‐negative patients showed a significant reduction in both intrahepatic HBcAg (P = 0.04) and HBsAg expression (P < 0.001). In contrast, a reduction in intrahepatic HBcAg expression was not observed in HBeAg‐positive patients, while a trend in reduction of intrahepatic HBsAg staining was found (P = 0.09). Post‐treatment, 7 (13%) HBeAg‐positive and 9 (14%) HBeAg‐negative patients had no expression of intrahepatic HBsAg. Patients without any intrahepatic HBsAg expression post‐treatment were more likely to achieve a combined response (HBeAg loss with hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA <2000 IU/mL for HBeAg ‐positive and HBV DNA <2000 IU/mL and normal alanine aminotransferase for HBeAg‐negative CHB): 71% vs 5% for HBeAg‐positive (P < 0.001) and 60% vs 16% for HBeAg‐negative patients (P = 0.004), respectively. Moreover, a more profound decline of serum HBsAg was observed in patients with absence of intrahepatic HBsAg staining (3.1 vs 0.4 log IU/mL, P < 0.001 and 1.7 vs 0.4 log IU/mL, P = 0.005 for HBeAg‐positive and HBeAg‐negative CHB, respectively). In conclusion, PEG‐IFN reduces expression of intrahepatic HBsAg. Loss of HBsAg as assessed by immunohistochemistry from the liver predicts a sustained response and is reflected in a pronounced serum HBsAg decline.     

Relapse rates in chronic hepatitis B naïve patients after discontinuation of antiviral therapy with entecavir

Registration studies show entecavir (ETV) to be effective and safe in NUC‐naïve patients with chronic hepatitis B, but relapse rates after treatment discontinuation have not been well established. Relapse rates and predictors of relapse were evaluated in naïve HBeAg‐positive and HBeAg‐negative patients treated with ETV. Treatment duration was defined according to international guidelines. Virological relapse was defined as reappearance in serum of hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA to >2000 IU/mL after discontinuation of treatment. A hundred and sixty‐nine consecutive patients were treated for a median 181 weeks. 61% were HBeAg positive, 23% had cirrhosis, and mean HBV DNA level was 6.88 ± 1.74 log₁₀ IU/mL. Ninety‐two per cent became HBV DNA negative; 71% of HBeAg+ve patients became HBeAg negative and 68% anti‐HBe positive; 14% became HBsAg negative and 13% anti‐HBs positive. At the end of the study, 36 patients discontinued treatment: one due to breakthrough associated with resistant variants and 35 (20%) due to sustained virological response; 33 of these patients developed HBeAg seroconversion and 18 HBsAg seroconversion. Median off‐treatment time was 69 weeks. Nine patients (26%), all HBeAg positive at baseline, developed virological relapse after a median 48 weeks off‐treatment, 3 of them showed HBeAg reversion and 4 lost anti‐HBe. No patient with HBsAg seroconversion relapsed. HBeAg clearance after week 48 of treatment was associated with an increase risk of relapse. After ETV discontinuation, HBsAg seroconversion was maintained in 100% of the patients, HBeAg seroconversion maintained in 90%, and virological relapse rate was 24%.     

The incidence and predictors of HBV relapse after cessation of tenofovir therapy in chronic hepatitis B patients

This study investigates the incidences and predictors of hepatitis B virus (HBV) relapse after tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) therapy in hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)‐positive and ‐negative patients. We retrospectively recruited 143 chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients without cirrhosis (39 HBeAg‐positive and 104 HBeAg‐negative patients) who were previously treated with TDF and had post‐treatment follow‐up for at least 6 months (median: 55, IQR 36‐85 weeks). All the patients fulfilled the stopping criteria of APASL 2012. The virological and clinical relapse rates at 104 weeks in HBeAg‐positive patients were 66.6% and 59.1%, while they were 72.3% and 55.9%, respectively, in HBeAg‐negative patients. Cox regression analysis revealed that the higher end‐of‐treatment HBsAg levels were an independent factor of virological relapse in HBeAg‐positive and HBeAg‐negative patients. The end‐of‐treatment HBsAg levels of 200 (area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC): 0.624) and 80 IU/mL (AUROC: 0.959) were the optimal values for predicting HBV relapse in HBeAg‐positive and HBeAg‐negative patients, respectively. The virological relapse rate at 78 weeks was 14.3% and 19.6% in HBeAg‐positive and HBeAg‐negative patients who achieved HBsAg ≤200 IU/mL and HBsAg ≤80 IU/mL, respectively. Two patients experienced hepatic decompensation upon hepatitis flares, and no patient died after timely retreatment. Seven patients experienced off‐therapy HBsAg loss. The cumulative rates of HBsAg loss at 104 weeks were 45.5% and 59.3% in patients with end‐of‐treatment HBsAg ≤80 IU/mL and ≤50 IU/mL, respectively. In conclusions, the end‐of‐treatment HBsAg levels were a useful marker for predicting HBV relapse in HBeAg‐positive and HBeAg‐negative CHB patients.     

HBsAg and HBcrAg as predictors of HBeAg seroconversion in HBeAg‐positive patients treated with nucleos(t)ide analogues

HBeAg seroconversion marks an important spontaneous change and treatment end‐point for HBeAg‐positive patients and is a pre‐requisite for HBsAg loss or functional cure. In this retrospective analysis, we aimed to identify predictors of seroconversion using serum quantitative HBsAg and HBcrAg, in HBeAg‐positive patients treated with nucleos(t)ide analogues (NA). Data and samples from 118 HBeAg‐positive adults (genotypes A‐G) started on NA between Jan 2005 and Sept 2016 were retrospectively analysed at several time‐points. The predictive power of on‐treatment levels of HBsAg and HBcrAg was determined using receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis and cut‐off values determined by maximized Youden's index. About 36.4% of patients achieved HBeAg seroconversion after a median of 39 months’ treatment. On treatment kinetics of HBV DNA, HBsAg and HBcrAg differed between HBeAg seroconverters and nonseroconverters. A combination of HBsAg and HBcrAg had the greatest predictive value for HBeAg seroconversion: at 6 months, HBsAg of 3.9 log₁₀ IU/mL and HBcrAg of 5.7 log₁₀ U/mL had a sensitivity of 71.4%, specificity of 79.5%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 65.2% and negative predictive value (NPV) of 83.8%, with AUROC of 0.769 (0.668, 0.869; 95%CI), and at 12 months, HBsAg 3.8 log₁₀ IU/mL and HBcrAg 5.5 log₁₀ U/mL had a sensitivity of 73.7%, specificity of 79.5%, PPV of 63.6% and NPV of 86.1%, with AUROC 0.807 (0.713, 0.901; 95% CI). In conclusion, our results may be used to identify patients who are unlikely to achieve treatment end‐points, which will be important as the future management of chronic hepatitis B looks to therapies that offer functional cure.     

Add‐on peginterferon alfa‐2a to nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy for Caucasian patients with hepatitis B ‘e’ antigen‐negative chronic hepatitis B genotype D

Nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) and peginterferon have complementary effects in chronic hepatitis B, but it is unclear whether combination therapy improves responses in genotype D‐infected patients. We conducted an open‐label study of peginterferon alfa‐2a 180 μg/wk added to ongoing NA therapy in hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)‐negative, genotype D‐infected patients with hepatitis B virus DNA <20 IU/mL. The primary endpoint was proportion of patients with ≥50% decline in serum HBsAg by the end of the 48‐week add‐on phase. Seventy patients received treatment, 11 were withdrawn at week 24 for no decrease in HBsAg, and 14 withdrew for other reasons. Response rate (per‐protocol population) was 67.4% (29/43) at week 48 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 51, 81) and 50.9% (28/55) at week 96 (95% CI: 38, 66). Median serum HBsAg decreased throughout peginterferon alfa‐2a treatment and was significantly lower than baseline at weeks 48, 72 and 96 (P < 0.001). Decreases in HBsAg of ≥0.5‐log₁₀ and ≥1‐log₁₀ were documented in 19 (44.2%) and 6 (14.0%) patients at week 48 and 6 (10.9%) and 17 (30.9%) patients at week 96. The proportion of patients with HBsAg <1000, <500, <100 and <10 IU/mL at ≥1 timepoint during treatment was 78.6% (n = 44), 57.1% (n = 32), 21.4% (n = 12) and 7.1% (n = 4). Interferon gamma‐induced protein 10 increased from baseline up to week 48, with week 12 levels significantly associated with response at week 48. Addition of peginterferon alfa‐2a to ongoing NA therapy significantly decreased HBsAg levels in HBeAg‐negative patients with genotype D infection (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01706575).     

Comparison between quantitative hepatitis B surface antigen,hepatitis B e‐antigen and hepatitis B virus DNA levels for predicting virological response to pegylated interferon‐α‐2b therapy in hepatitis B e‐antigen‐positive chronic hepatitis B

Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the clinical applicability of quantitative serum hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), hepatitis B e‐antigen (HBeAg) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA for predicting virological response (VR) to pegylated interferon (PEG‐IFN) therapy. Methods: Thirty HBeAg‐positive chronic hepatitis B patients who received PEG‐IFN‐α‐2b for 48 weeks were enrolled. Quantitative HBsAg, HBeAg and HBV DNA were measured before, during and after the therapy. Paired liver biopsies were performed before and after treatment for covalently closed circular (ccc)DNA and intrahepatic HBV DNA analysis. Results: VR at 48 weeks post‐treatment, defined as HBeAg seroconversion and HBV DNA less than 10 000 copies/mL was achieved in 10 (33.3%) patients. Responders had significantly lower baseline HBsAg, HBeAg, cccDNA and intrahepatic HBV DNA levels than non‐responders. Baseline and reduced levels of log₁₀ HBsAg and log₁₀ HBeAg correlated well with those of log₁₀ cccDNA and log₁₀ total intrahepatic HBV DNA. Responders showed consistent decrease in serum HBsAg, HBeAg and HBV DNA levels during therapy. HBeAg level of 2.0 log₁₀ sample to cut‐off ratio at week 24 on therapy provided the best prediction of sustained virological response, with sensitivity and negative predictive values of 85% and 92%, respectively. One patient (3.3%) who cleared HBsAg at follow up exhibited a more rapid decline in serum HBsAg during therapy than those who developed VR without HBsAg clearance. Conclusion: Quantitative measurement of serum HBeAg during therapy may be superior to serum HBsAg and HBV DNA as a prediction of HBeAg seroconversion. Kinetics of HBsAg levels on therapy may help predict HBsAg clearance after treatment.     

Hepatitis B surface antigen reduction by switching from long‐term nucleoside/nucleotide analogue administration to pegylated interferon

Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) reduction during nucleoside/nucleotide analogue (NA) therapy is slow and an alternative strategy for patients receiving ongoing NA to facilitate HBsAg reduction is required. We investigated whether switching to pegylated interferon (PEG‐IFN) after long‐term NA administration enhances HBsAg reduction. Forty‐nine patients who switched from long‐term NA to 48 weeks of PEG‐IFN alfa‐2a were studied. The mean duration of previous NA was 48 months (sequential group). A total of 147 patients who continued NA and matched for baseline characteristics were analysed for comparison (NA continuation group). The treatment response was defined as HBsAg reduction ≥1.0 logIU/mL at the end of PEG‐IFN. HBsAg reduction at week 48 was 0.81±1.1 logIU/mL in the sequential group, which was significantly higher than that in the NA continuation group (0.11±0.3 logIU/mL, P < .001). The treatment response was achieved in 29% and 2% of the sequential group and NA continuation group (P < .001), and the odds ratio of sequential therapy for the treatment response was 19 compared with the NA continuation (P < .001). In patients tested positive for hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg), HBeAg seroconversion was higher in the sequential group (44% vs 8%, P < .001). In HBeAg‐negative patients, only patients in the sequential group achieved HBsAg loss. No patient needed to resume NA administration because of HBV DNA increase accompanied by alanine aminotransferase flares. In summary, sequential therapy with PEG‐IFN after long‐term NA enhances the reduction of HBsAg and may represent a treatment option to promote HBsAg loss.     

Loss of HBsAg antigen during treatment with entecavir or lamivudine in nucleoside‐naïve HBeAg‐positive patients with chronic hepatitis B*

Summary. This retrospective analysis was conducted to describe the characteristics of nucleoside‐naïve hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)‐positive patients with chronic hepatitis B, who achieved hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss during entecavir or lamivudine therapy. HBeAg‐positive adults with chronic hepatitis B, elevated serum alanine aminotransferase, and compensated liver disease were randomized to double‐blind treatment for up to 96 weeks with entecavir 0.5 mg/day or lamivudine 100 mg/day. HBsAg and hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA were measured at regular intervals during and off‐treatment follow‐up. Through a maximum duration of 96 weeks on‐treatment and 24 weeks off‐treatment, HBsAg loss was confirmed in 18/354 (5.1%) patients treated with entecavir and 10/355 (2.8%) patients treated with lamivudine. Among the 28 patients with confirmed HBsAg loss, 27 (96%) achieved HBV DNA <300 copies/mL, and 27 (96%) achieved confirmed HBeAg loss. All entecavir recipients with HBsAg loss had HBV DNA <300 copies/mL. Caucasian patients, and those infected with HBV genotype A or D, were significantly more likely to lose HBsAg. This retrospective analysis of data from a randomized, global phase three trial shows that confirmed loss of HBsAg occurred in 5% of nucleoside‐naïve HBeAg‐positive patients treated with entecavir, and that HBsAg loss is associated with sustained off‐treatment suppression of HBV DNA.     

Prediction of response to entecavir therapy in patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B based on on-treatment HBsAg, HBeAg and HBV DNA levels

Summary. Quantitative hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) assays are emerging as effective tools of on‐treatment predictors of response to antiviral agents, in addition to monitoring serum HBV DNA levels. However, the dynamic relationship between quantitative HBsAg, as well as HBeAg and HBV DNA, and the predictability of subsequent clinical outcomes during entecavir (ETV) therapy remain unclear. Eighty‐two patients with HBeAg‐positive chronic hepatitis B (CHB) received ETV therapy for ≥3 years. Virologic response (VR) after 3 years of ETV therapy was achieved in 73 (89.0%) patients. Among baseline and on‐treatment factors, on‐treatment HBV DNA levels performed better with respect to the prediction of response than HBsAg and HBeAg levels. Especially, the performance of absolute values of HBV DNA with respect to response was superior to HBV DNA decline from the baseline. The best predictive value was an absolute HBV DNA level of 2.3 log₁₀ IU/mL at month 6 (areas under the curve [AUROC], 0.977; 95% CI, 0.940–1.000; P < 0.001). HBeAg seroconversion after 3 years of therapy was achieved in 26 (31.7%) patients. On‐treatment HBeAg levels performed better with respect to the prediction of seroconversion than HBsAg and HBV DNA levels. The best cut‐off value for the HBeAg level at month 12 for the prediction of seroconversion was 0.62 log₁₀ PEIU/mL. Although the HBsAg level at baseline is often used to predict the antiviral potency of entecavir, on‐treatment HBV DNA and HBeAg levels are more helpful for prediction of subsequent clinical outcomes in HBeAg‐positive CHB patients with entecavir treatment.     

Hepatitis B surface antigen clearance in inactive hepatitis B surface antigen carriers treated with peginterferon alfa-2a

AIM: To examine the association between interferon(IFN) therapy and loss of hepatitis B surface antigen(HBs Ag) in inactive HBs Ag carriers. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study in inactive HBs Ag carriers, who were treatment-naive, with a serum HBs Ag level 100 IU/m L and an undetectable hepatitis B virus(HBV) DNA level( 100 IU/m L). All the 20 treated patients received subcutaneous PEG-IFN alfa-2a 180 μg/wk for 72 wk and were then followed for 24 wk. There were 40 untreated controls matched with 96 wk of observation. Serum HBs Ag, HBV DNA, and alanine aminotransferases were monitored every 3 mo in the treatment group and every 3-6 mo in the control group. RESULTS: Thirteen(65.0%) of 20 treated patients achieved HBs Ag loss, 12 of whom achieved HBs Ag seroconversion. Mean HBs Ag level in treated patients decreased to 6.69 ± 13.04 IU/m L after 24 wk of treatment from a baseline level of 26.22 ± 33.00 IU/m L. Serum HBV DNA level remained undetectable( 100 IU/m L) in all treated patients during the study. HBs Ag level of the control group decreased from 25.72 ± 25.58 IU/m L at baseline to 17.11 ± 21.62 IU/m L at week 96(P = 0.108). In the control group, no patient experienced HBs Ag loss/seroconversion, and two(5.0%) developed HBV reactivation.CONCLUSION: IFN treatment results in HBs Ag loss and seroconversion in a considerable proportion of inactive HBs Ag carriers with low HBs Ag concentrations.     

HBsAg loss after peginterferon‐nucleotide combination treatment in chronic hepatitis B patients: 5 years of follow‐up

Combining peginterferon‐alfa‐2a (pegIFN) with a nucleotide analogue can result in higher rates of HBsAg loss than either therapy given alone. Here, we investigated the durability of the response to combination therapy in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients after 5 years of follow‐up. In the initial study, 92 CHB patients (44 HBeAg‐positive, 48 HBeAg‐negative) with HBV DNA >100 000 c/mL (~20 000 IU/mL) and active hepatitis were treated for 48 weeks with pegIFN 180 μg/week and 10 mg adefovir dipivoxil daily. For the long‐term follow‐up (LTFU) study, patients were followed up for 5 years after the end of treatment. At year 5, 70 (32 HBeAg‐positive, 38 HBeAg‐negative) patients remained in the study. At year 5, 19% (6/32) of HBeAg‐positive patients and 16% (6/38) of HBeAg‐negative patients lost HBsAg, and no HBsAg seroreversion was observed. The 5‐year cumulative Kaplan‐Meier estimate for HBsAg loss was 17.2% for HBeAg‐positive patients and 19.3% for HBeAg‐negative patients. Fourteen of sixteen patients who lost HBsAg at any time point during follow‐up developed anti‐HBs antibodies (>10 IU/L). At year 5, in total 63% (20/32) of HBeAg‐positive and 71% (27/38) of HBeAg‐negative patients were retreated with nucleos(t)ide analogues during follow‐up. The cumulative Kaplan‐Meier estimate for retreatment was 60% of patients at year 5. At year 5 of follow‐up, 18% of CHB patients treated with pegIFN/nucleotide analogue combination therapy had durable HBsAg loss and 88% of these had developed anti‐HBs antibodies.     

Long‐term entecavir therapy results in falls in serum hepatitis B surface antigen levels and seroclearance in nucleos(t)ide‐naïve chronic hepatitis B patients

Entecavir (ETV) is reported to result in suppression of hepatitis B virus DNA (HBV DNA) replication with minimal drug resistance. However, information on the long‐term effect of such therapy on serum hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) level and elimination of HBsAg is not available. ETV therapy was started in 553 nucleos(t)ide‐naïve patients with chronic hepatitis B infection (HBeAg positive: 45%) in our hospital. Serum HBsAg levels were measured serially by the Architect assay. The median baseline HBsAg was 2180 IU/mL (0.12–243 000 IU/mL), and median follow‐up period was 3.0 years, with 529, 475, 355, 247 and 163 patients followed‐up for 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years, respectively. At year 5, the mean log HBsAg decline from baseline was −0.48 log IU/mL, and the cumulative HBsAg clearance rate was 3.5%. Multivariate analysis identified HBV DNA level at baseline (<3.0 log copies IU/mL, odd ratio = 10.2; 95% confidence interval = 1.87–55.5, P = 0.007) and HBsAg level (<500 IU/mL, odd ratio = 29.4; 95% confidence interval = 2.80–333, P = 0.005) as independent predictors of HBsAg seroclearance. These results indicate that although serum HBsAg level declines gradually during ETV therapy, HBsAg seroclearance remains a rare event.     

Predictors of sustained functional cure in hepatitis B envelope antigen‐negative patients achieving hepatitis B surface antigen seroclearance with interferon‐alpha–based therapy

Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss is considered a functional cure in chronic hepatitis B (CHB). However, the durability of HBsAg loss after stopping treatment remains unknown. This study aimed to assess the sustained functional cure achieved by interferon therapy in hepatitis B envelope antigen (HBeAg)‐negative CHB patients. In this prospective study, 176 HBeAg‐negative CHB patients with functional cure were enrolled for 12 weeks of cessation treatment, and treatment information and baseline data were collected. Hepatitis B virus (HBV) biomarkers and clinical biochemical indicators were evaluated every 3 months; liver imaging examinations were performed every 3‐6 months during the 48‐week follow‐up. The sustained functional cure was evaluated. After the 48‐week follow‐up, the sustained functional cure rate was 86.63%. The cumulative rates of HBsAg reversion and HBV DNA reversion were 12.79% and 2.33%, respectively. Consolidation treatment ≥ 12 weeks after HBsAg loss achieved a significantly higher rate of sustained functional cure and significantly lower rate of HBsAg reversion than consolidation treatment < 12 weeks (76.19% vs 90.00%, P = 0.022 and 23.81% vs 9.23%, P = 0.014, respectively). Patients with hepatitis B surface antibody (HBsAb) had higher rate of sustained functional cure than patients achieving HBsAg loss but without HBsAb (89.86% vs 73.53%, P = 0.012). Consolidation treatment ≥ 12 weeks (odds ratio [OR] 16.478; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.135‐127.151; P = 0.007) and high HBsAb levels (OR 8.312; 95% CI, 1.824‐37.881; P = 0.006) were independent predictors of sustained functional cure. Results suggested that 12 weeks of consolidation therapy after HBsAg clearance and elevated HBsAb levels help to improve functional cure.     

Relationship between hepatitis B core‐related antigen levels and sustained HBeAg seroconversion in patients treated with nucleo(s)tide analogues

Hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) seroconversion experienced during nucleo(s)tide analogue (NUC) therapy is often not sustained. We aimed to study whether hepatitis B core‐related antigen (HBcrAg) levels predict sustained HBeAg seroconversion in patients treated with NUCs. We studied HBeAg‐positive patients treated with NUCs for at least 6 months. We quantified HBcrAg at baseline and at the time of HBeAg seroconversion and studied the relationship with HBeAg seroconversion and subsequent relapse. HBcrAg was quantified at baseline in 196 patients; levels varied significantly by HBV genotype and correlated with HBsAg, HBV DNA and HBeAg. Baseline HBcrAg levels were lower in patients who achieved HBeAg seroconversion than in those who did not; the unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) was 0.802 (95% CI: 0.656‐0.980, P = 0.031); and this association was not sustained in multivariate analysis. HBcrAg remained detectable in all patients at the time of HBeAg seroconversion. Higher HBcrAg at the time of seroconversion was an independent predictor of relapse (adjusted HR: 1.855 (95% CI: 1.099‐3.133, P = 0.021), and none of the patients with HBcrAg < 4.90 log U/mL experienced relapse. Baseline HBcrAg is not an independent predictor of HBeAg seroconversion during NUC therapy. HBcrAg remains detectable in patients after HBeAg seroconversion. Patients with lower levels at the time of seroconversion have a higher probability of sustained HBeAg seroconversion.     

Serum hepatitis B virus RNA predicts response to peginterferon treatment in HBeAg‐positive chronic hepatitis B

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) RNA in serum is a novel biomarker that reflects cccDNA activity. We investigated whether HBV RNA can predict serological response to peginterferon (PEG‐IFN) treatment. Serum HBV RNA levels were retrospectively measured at weeks 0, 12, 24 and 52 of therapy and after treatment discontinuation (week 78) in 266 HBeAg‐positive chronic HBV patients who had participated in a global randomized controlled trial (HBV99‐01 study). Patients received 52 weeks PEG‐IFN monotherapy (n = 136) or PEG‐IFN and lamivudine (n = 130). The primary end point was HBeAg loss 24 weeks after PEG‐IFN discontinuation. At baseline, the mean serum level of HBV RNA was 6.8 (SD 1.2) log c/mL. HBV RNA levels declined to 4.7 (1.7) log c/mL after one year of PEG‐IFN therapy alone and to 3.3 (1.2)log c/mL after combination therapy. From week 12 onward, HBV RNA level was significantly lower in patients who achieved HBeAg loss at the end of follow‐up as compared to those who did not, regardless of treatment allocation (week 12:4.4 vs 5.1 log c/mL, P = .01; week 24:3.7 vs 4.9 log c/mL, P < .001). The performance of a multivariable model based on HBV RNA level was comparable at week 12 (AUC 0.68) and 24 (AUC 0.72) of therapy. HBV RNA level above 5.5 log c/mL at week 12 showed negative predictive values of 93/67/90/64% for HBV genotypes A/B/C/D for the prediction of HBeAg loss. In conclusion, HBV RNA in serum declines profoundly during PEG‐IFN treatment. Early on‐treatment HBV RNA level may be used to predict nonresponse.     

Association of on‐treatment serum hepatitis B surface antigen level with sustained virological response to nucleos(t)ide analog in patients with hepatitis B e‐antigen positive chronic hepatitis B

Aim: This study evaluated the on‐treatment serum hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) level during nucleos(t)ide analog (NUC) therapy and the correlation with off‐treatment sustained virological response (SVR). Methods: Fifty‐one consecutive patients with hepatitis B e‐antigen (HBeAg) positive chronic hepatitis B who achieved HBeAg loss/seroconversion after NUC therapy and completed 12 months or more of additional therapy were included. Serum HBsAg and hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA levels were determined at baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months, and at the end of treatment. SVR was defined as HBV DNA levels of less than 10 000 copies/mL until 6 or 12 months off‐treatment without reappearance of HBeAg. Results: Twenty‐two (43.1%) and 13 (25.5%) patients maintained SVR at 6 and 12 months off‐treatment, respectively. In univariate analyses, a decline of HBsAg of 0.5 log₁₀ IU/mL or less at 6 months (P = 0.006) and 12 months (P = 0.013), the mean change in HBsAg level at 6 months (P = 0.024), and lamivudine or entecavir treatment (P = 0.019) were significant predictive factors for SVR at 6 months off‐treatment. A decline of HBsAg of 0.5 log₁₀ IU/mL or less at 6 months and lamivudine or entecavir treatment were independent factors on multivariate analyses (odds ratio [OR], 16.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.86–142.86 [P = 0.012]; and OR, 14.83; 95% CI, 1.18–185.73 [P = 0.036]; respectively). Conclusion: On‐treatment serum HBsAg level predicted early off‐treatment SVR to NUC therapy in patients infected with genotype C.     

Predictors of hepatitis B surface antigen loss,relapse and retreatment after discontinuation of effective oral antiviral therapy in noncirrhotic HBeAg‐negative chronic hepatitis B

Reliable predictors of outcomes after treatment discontinuation in HBeAg‐negative chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients have not been established. We investigated the role of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), interferon‐inducible protein‐10 (IP10) and hepatitis B core‐related antigen (HBcrAg) serum levels as predictors of HBsAg loss, relapse and retreatment in noncirrhotic HBeAg‐negative CHB patients who discontinued long‐term antiviral therapy. All HBsAg‐positive (n = 57) patients of the prospective DARING‐B study were included and followed monthly for 3 months, every 2/3 months until month‐12 and every 3/6 months thereafter. HBsAg, IP10 and HBcrAg levels were measured by enzyme immunoassays, and SCALE‐B score was calculated. Twelve patients achieved HBsAg loss before retreatment with 18‐month cumulative incidence of 25%. Independent predictors of HBsAg loss were baseline HBsAg and month‐1 IP10 levels. Of 10 patients with baseline HBsAg ≤100 IU/mL, 70% cleared HBsAg and 10% required retreatment. Of 23 patients with baseline HBsAg >1000 IU/mL, 4% cleared HBsAg and 43% required retreatment. Of 24 patients with intermediate baseline HBsAg (100‐1000 IU/mL), 17% cleared HBsAg and 21% required retreatment; in this subgroup, month‐1 IP10 was significantly associated with HBsAg loss, which occurred in 30% and 7% of cases with IP10 >150 and ≤150 pg/mL, respectively. Baseline HBcrAg was undetectable in all patients who cleared HBsAg and was associated with retreatment. SCALE‐B was associated with HBsAg loss but not with relapse or retreatment. In conclusion, HBsAg, IP10 and HBcrAg serum levels can be useful for the decisions and management of treatment discontinuation in noncirrhotic Caucasian patients with HBeAg‐negative CHB.     

Hepatitis B core‐related antigen monitoring during peginterferon alfa treatment for HBeAg‐negative chronic hepatitis B

Serum Hepatitis B core‐related antigen (HBcrAg) level moderately correlates with cccDNA. We examined whether HBcrAg can add value in monitoring the effect of peginterferon (PEG‐IFN) therapy for HBeAg‐negative chronic hepatitis B (CHB) infection. Thus, serum HBcrAg level was measured in 133 HBeAg‐negative, mainly Caucasian CHB patients, treated with 48 weeks of PEG‐IFN alfa‐2a. We assessed its association with response (ALT normalization & HBV DNA < 2000 IU/mL) at week 72. HBcrAg level strongly correlated with HBV DNA level (r = 0.8, P < 0.001) and weakly with qHBsAg and ALT (both r = 0.2, P = 0.01). At week 48, mean HBcrAg decline was ?3.3 log U/mL. Baseline levels were comparable for patients with and without response at week 72 (5.0 vs 4.9 log U/mL, P = 0.59). HBcrAg decline at week 72 differed between patients with and without response (?2.4 vs ?1.0 log U/mL, P = 0.001), but no cut‐off could be determined. The pattern of decline in responders resembled that of HBV DNA, but HBcrAg decline was weaker (HBcrAg ?2.5 log U/mL; HBV DNA: ?4.0 log IU/mL, P < 0.001). For early identification of nonresponse, diagnostic accuracy of HBV DNA and qHBsAg decline at week 12 (AUC 0.742, CI‐95% [0.0.629‐0.855], P < 0.001) did not improve by adding HBcrAg decline (AUC 0.747, CI‐95% [0.629‐0.855] P < 0.001), nor by replacing HBV DNA decline by HBcrAg decline (AUC 0.754, CI‐95% [0.641‐0.867], P < 0.001). In conclusion, in Caucasian patients with HBeAg‐negative CHB, decline of HBcrAg during PEG‐IFN treatment was stronger in patients with treatment response. However, HBcrAg was not superior to HBV DNA and qHBsAg in predicting response during PEG‐IFN treatment.     

Baseline and kinetics of serum hepatitis B virus RNA predict response to pegylated interferon‐based therapy in patients with hepatitis B e antigen‐negative chronic hepatitis B

Serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) RNA has emerged as a novel biomarker of treatment response. This study aimed to investigate the role of this marker in predicting long‐term outcome of patients with hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)‐negative chronic hepatitis B (CHB) receiving pegylated interferon (PEG‐IFN)‐based therapy. Serial serum samples from 91 patients with HBeAg‐negative CHB previously treated with PEG‐IFN alone or combined with entecavir in a randomized trial were retrospectively analysed. HBV RNA quantification was examined by droplet digital PCR. At the end of 3 years post‐treatment follow‐up, maintained virological response (MVR, HBV DNA < 2000 IU/mL), and hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) clearance were achieved in 37.4% (34/91) and 7.7% (7/91), respectively. Baseline serum HBV RNA concentrations correlated with HBV DNA and covalently closed circular DNA but did not correlate with HBsAg levels. Multiple regression analysis showed that pre‐treatment HBV RNA and HBsAg were independently associated with MVR and HBsAg clearance. Baseline HBV RNA (cut‐off 2.0 log₁₀ copies/mL) had a positive predictive value (PPV) and a negative predictive value in predicting MVR of 80.8% and 80.0%, respectively. At the same cut‐off value, PPV and NPV for predicting HBsAg clearance were 30.8% and 95.4%, respectively. At week 12 during therapy, HBV RNA level ≥ 2 log₁₀ copies/mL displayed high NPVs of achieving MVR and HBsAg clearance (95% and 100%, respectively). In conclusion, the measurement of HBV RNA prior to PEG‐IFN‐based therapy could identify patients with high probability of MVR. In addition, HBV RNA kinetics may serve as a promising “stopping rule” in patients infected with HBV genotypes B or C.