Treatment of DAA-Experienced Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C

Purpose of Review

The development of interferon-free direct-acting antiviral (DAA) regimens for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C (HCV) has significantly improved rates of sustained virologic response (SVR), shortened treatment duration, and improved drug tolerability across genotypes. While SVR rates now exceed 95% among treatment-naïve patients, there are a growing number of patients who have experienced DAA treatment failure and represent an emerging clinical challenge. This review discusses recent data on sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir, sofosbuvir/velpatasvir, and glecaprevir/pibrentasvir for the treatment of DAA-experienced patients, as well as updated American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases/Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines.

Recent Findings

Data from phase 3 randomized clinical trials show that retreatment of DAA failures is successful in >?90% of patients using the above three regimens. The preferred retreatment regimen is dependent on HCV genotype, possible drug-drug interactions, prior treatment experience, and host factors such as the presence of cirrhosis and renal failure. Sofosbuvir/velpatasvir is a reasonable option for DAA-experienced genotype 1b and genotype 2 patients, but has been shown to be inferior to sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir in genotype 1a and genotype 3 patients. Glecaprevir/pibrentasvir is a very attractive option for treatment of DAA-experienced genotype 1 and 2 patients, but it is not approved for treatment of DAA-experienced patients with genotype 3, and data is lacking to support its use in DAA treatment-experienced patients with genotypes 4–6.

Summary

The potency and high barrier to resistance of newer DAA regimens create an opportunity to cure most people with chronic hepatitis C, regardless of prior treatment failures. It is now possible to consider elimination of hepatitis C; the remaining barriers are the cost of therapy and access to care.

     

Sofosbuvir,velpatasvir and voxilaprevir combination for the treatment of hepatitis C

Introduction: The advent of direct-acting antiviral (DAA) treatments for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has dramatically increased rates of cure. However, there remain difficult-to-treat populations, including patients with genotype 3 infection and cirrhosis, and limited salvage treatment options for those that have failed first-line DAA therapy.

Areas covered: This is a review of the preclinical and clinical development of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir (SOF/VEL/VOX), an interferon-free, oral, once daily, pangenotypic treatment for chronic HCV infection. All relevant literature from 2015 through June of 2017 is included.

Expert commentary: Voxilaprevir, a second-generation HCV protease inhibitor, in combination with the already approved combination of sofosbuvir and velpatasvir, was evaluated in the POLARIS trials and found to be a safe and effective regimen. Patients with prior DAA treatment failure, genotype 3, cirrhosis and/or unfavorable resistance profiles all achieved cure rates of 96% or greater. The most distinctive role for this potent regimen may prove to be as a salvage regimen for patients who have failed previous DAA therapy.     

应用索磷布韦/维帕他韦治疗门诊和住院筛查的丙型肝炎患者疗效研究

目的 调查真实世界丙型肝炎病毒感染情况,并探讨应用索磷布韦/维帕他韦治疗慢性丙型肝炎(CHC)患者病毒学应答情况。方法 2017年9月～2019年9月行血清抗-HCV检测的3966例住院和门诊患者,应用索磷布韦/维帕他韦治疗CHC患者12 w。结果 在3966例患者中,检出血清抗-HCV阳性80例(2.0%);在80例抗-HCV阳性者中,同期进行了血清HCV RNA检测者42例,结果40例(95.2%)血清HCV RNA阳性;在40例CHC患者中,12例无明显症状和体征,18例有腹胀、乏力、纳差,10例有蜘蛛痣、肝病面容、肝掌、脾肿大;35例血清AST＞90 U/L,4例AST轻度异常,1例AST正常;3例存在HBV/HCV混合感染;B超检查14例正常,26例提示肝内光点增粗;40例CHC患者接受索磷布韦/维帕他韦治疗,结果RVR、EVR、ETVR、SVR、NR和复发率分别为75.0%、80.0%、82.5%、72.5%、10.0%和10.0%;在治疗12 w末,血清TBIL水平为(30.7±4.3)μmol/L,显著低于治疗前【(80.4±15.6)μmol/L,P＜0.05】,血清AST水平为(72.5±18.6)U/L,显著低于治疗前【(247.7±110.4) U/L,P＜0.05】,血清ALB水平为(49.2±11.5)g/L,显著高于治疗前【(35.9±9.2)g/L,P＜0.05】;不良反应发生率为22.5%。结论 真实世界丙型肝炎发病率较高,对患者进行HCV感染筛查很有必要。应用索磷布韦/维帕他韦治疗CHC患者疗效显著,血清病毒学应答率高,能显著改善肝功能,且具有一定的安全性。     

Deferred treatment with a fixed‐dose combination of sofosbuvir‐velpatasvir for chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 1, 2, 4 and 6 infection

Sofosbuvir‐velpatasvir is approved for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. In this single‐arm, open‐label, phase 3, deferred treatment study, we investigated the efficacy and safety of sofosbuvir‐velpatasvir among patients randomized to the placebo group in the ASTRAL‐1 study. Patients received sofosbuvir‐velpatasvir (400/100 mg) once daily for 12 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients with sustained virologic response 12 weeks after the end of therapy (SVR12). The primary safety endpoint was any adverse events (AEs) leading to the permanent discontinuation of study drug. Overall, 108/111 (97%, 95% confidence interval [CI], 92%‐99%) achieved SVR12, and only one patient had virological failure. SVR12 was achieved by 61/63 (97%, 95%CI, 89%‐100%) genotype 1 patients, 20/20 (100%; 95%CI, 83%‐100%) with genotype 2, 19/19 (100%; 95%CI, 82%‐100%) with genotype 4 and 8/9 (89%; 95% CI, 52%‐100%) with genotype 6. All (19/19; 95%CI, 82‐100) patients with cirrhosis and all (31/31, 95%CI, 89‐100) with prior treatment experience achieved SVR12. The safety profile during treatment was similar to that observed in patients receiving placebo treatment. The most common AEs were headache, fatigue and nausea. One patient (1%) discontinued treatment due to an AE of gallbladder carcinoma, which was not considered related to treatment. Of five reported serious AEs, none were considered related to study drug. Sofosbuvir‐velpatasvir for 12 weeks was effective and well tolerated among untreated and previously treated patients with HCV genotype 1, 2, 4 or 6 infection, including those with compensated cirrhosis (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02346721).     

Sofosbuvir and velpatasvir for the treatment of hepatitis C

Introduction: Direct acting antivirals are revolutionizing the treatment of chronic hepatitis C. Specifically, the combination therapy sofosbuvir and velpatasvir offers a pangenotypic regimen with high sustained viral response (SVR).

Areas covered: Reviewed here are the clinical trials that led to the FDA approval of sofosbuvir and velpatasvir combination therapy, the adverse events during registration trials, and drug-drug interactions. Sofosbuvir and velpatasvir is a fixed dose regimen that is both interferon- and ribavirin-free. It is administered for 12 weeks as a once-a-day pill, covers all genotypes of hepatitis C, and achieves SVR >95% in non-cirrhotic patients and patients with compensated cirrhosis. Addition of ribavirin is recommended for patients with decompensated cirrhosis (CTP B or C). Baseline resistance-associated substitutions do not appear to impair ability to achieve SVR with an initial course of treatment.

Expert commentary: Availability of this highly efficacious, well tolerated, all oral regimen formulated as a single pill, can potentially simplify hepatitis C treatment. Its utility as a pangenotypic regimen additionally limits resource utilization.     

不同直接抗病毒药物方案对基因1b型慢性丙型肝炎及代偿期丙型肝炎肝硬化临床结局的影响

目的探讨不同直接抗病毒药物(DAAs)对基因1b型慢性丙型肝炎(CHC)及丙型肝炎代偿期肝硬化(CLC)临床结局的影响。方法以2018年1月-2018年12月就诊于山西医科大学第一医院感染科门诊的115例基因型1b型CHC(n=91)及CLC(n=24)患者为研究对象。所有患者根据病情均采用DAAs抗病毒治疗,CHC患者中28例采用索磷布韦联合维帕他韦方案,21例采用艾尔巴韦格拉瑞韦片方案,16例采用奥比帕利联合达塞布韦方案,13例采用索磷布韦联合达拉他韦方案,13例采用索磷布韦联合利巴韦林方案;CLC患者中15例采用索磷布韦联合维帕他韦方案,4例采用艾尔巴韦格拉瑞韦片方案,5例采用索磷布韦联合达拉他韦方案。分析2组患者的肝功能复常率及病毒学应答率,并观察药物的不良反应。计量资料组间比较采用t检验,计数资料组间比较采用χ^2检验。结果90.4%的患者在治疗1周时获得超快速病毒学应答,98.2%的患者在治疗4周时获得快速病毒学应答,100%的患者在治疗12周时获得完全早期病毒学应答,100%的患者在治疗结束后12周获得持续病毒学应答;不同抗病毒治疗方案在治疗1周、4周时HCV RNA阴转率差异均无统计学意义(χ^2值分别为2.83、0.07,P值均>0.05)。不同抗病毒方案均可明显改善患者肝功能(ALT和AST复常率),不同组间疗效差异均无统计学意义(χ^2值分别为0.83、1.23,P值均>0.05)。DAAs治疗12周后,2组患者肾功能指标与治疗前相比未见有明显升高或降低,差异均无统计学意义(t值分别为1.32、0.56,P值均>0.05)。不良事件的发生率较低,恶心2例(1.74%),头晕、心悸、皮疹、溶血各1例(0.87%)。结论根据病情采用相应DAAs抗病毒方案治疗1b型患者,均可取得较好的病毒学应答率,肝功能改善显著、不良事件的发生率低。     

Safety and efficacy of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir in post-liver transplant patients with previous direct-acting antiviral failure: Six case reports

BACKGROUNDDirect-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy regimens are highly effective at eliminating hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection but rates of sustained virologic response (SVR) are lower in patients with decompensated cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma. Since many of these patients will be referred for liver transplant, they will require retreatment after transplantation. Sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir (SOF/VEL/VOX) is recommended by guidelines as the preferred regimen to treat HCV in DAA-experienced patients following liver transplant however there is limited data.CASE SUMMARYWe present the cases of six liver transplant recipients who had previous treatment failure with sofosbuvir-based DAA therapy prior to transplantation and who then received SOF/VEL/VOX after transplant.CONCLUSIONThis case series demonstrate the real-world efficacy and safety of SOF/VEL/VOX in the post liver transplant setting. Treatment was successful with all patients achieving SVR, it was well tolerated, and there were minimal drug-drug interactions with their immunosuppressants.     

Sofosbuvir and simeprevir combination therapy in the setting of liver transplantation and hemodialysis

We report safety, tolerability, and 12‐week sustained virologic response with half‐standard dose sofosbuvir and standard‐dose simeprevir combination therapy in a hepatitis C virus genotype 1a‐infected liver transplant recipient on hemodialysis – uncharted territory for sofosbuvir‐based therapy. The patient was a non‐responder to prior treatment with pegylated interferon plus ribavirin. Sofosbuvir efficacy was maintained despite pill‐splitting and administration of half‐standard dose, 200 mg per day. No drug–drug interactions were noted with tacrolimus‐based immunosuppression. Laboratory tests remained stable or improved during therapy. Our observation, if reproduced in a larger study, may lead to significant improvement in clinical outcomes and cost savings in this patient population.     

Real-Life Data on Sofosbuvir/Ledipasvir in Patients with Chronic Viral Hepatitis C Genotype 1b: A Single-Center Experience

BackgroundThe course of hepatitis C disease has changed with the use of direct-acting antiviral drugs in the treatment of the disease. The aim of this study was to evaluate the real-life efficacy and safety of the sofosbuvir/ledipasvir drug regimen in the treatment of patients with genotype 1b.MethodsTreatment-naive or -experienced 49 genotypes 1b patients treated with sofosbuvir/ledipasvir participated in the study. Laboratory and hepatitis C virus RNA values were evaluated at baseline, week 12, and week 24 of treatment (36th week for those who received 24 weeks of treatment).ResultsThe sustained virologic response rate was 100% in patients who completed treatment. At the end of the study, there was a significant decrease in alanine transaminase, aspartate transaminase, gamma-glutamyl transferase, and alpha-fetoprotein levels (P = .000014, P = .000581, P = .000012, and P = .000821), respectively. Renal function tests (creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate) worsened (P = .003 and P = .007, respectively). Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was developed in 2 patients during post-treatment follow-up. In Kaplan–Meier analysis, the probability of not developing HCC was 86.5% at 26 months.ConclusionThe sofosbuvir/ledipasvir combination is effective in treating genotype 1b chronic hepatitis C with high sustained virologic response rates. Because there are few drug interactions, it may be a suitable option for patients taking multiple medications or who are transplant recipients. Renal function should be monitored closely during and after treatment, as there is a risk of worsening renal function after treatment.     

Therapy for hepatitis C genotype 3: moving forward

Until recently, the standard of care for hepatitis C virus genotype 3 infection was response‐guided therapy with pegylated interferon plus ribavirin for 16 to 48 or 72 weeks. The introduction of sofosbuvir plus ribavirin has revolutionized hepatitis C virus therapy. Nowadays, the recommend treatment regimen is a combination of sofosbuvir and a weight‐based ribavirin dose for 24 weeks. For easy to treat patients (e.g. naïve or previously treated patients without cirrhosis), this combination achieves high sustained virologic response rates and is well tolerated. However, in treatment‐experienced patients with cirrhosis, sustained virologic response is lower due to unknown reasons. The combination of two direct‐acting antiviral agents, sofosbuvir and daclatasvir, for 12 weeks is also associated with low sustained virologic response rates in this special population, for whom new drugs and different strategies are now under evaluation. Currently, the high cost of all these drugs limits access to treatment in many countries.     

Sofosbuvir plus ribavirin in Japanese patients with chronic genotype 2 HCV infection: an open‐label,phase 3 trial

Genotype 2 hepatitis C virus (HCV) accounts for up to 30% of chronic HCV infections in Japan. The standard of care for patients with genotype 2 HCV – peginterferon and ribavirin for 24 weeks – is poorly tolerated, especially among older patients and those with advanced liver disease. We conducted a phase 3, open‐label study to assess the efficacy and safety of an all‐oral combination of the NS5B polymerase inhibitor sofosbuvir and ribavirin in patients with chronic genotype 2 HCV infection in Japan. We enrolled 90 treatment‐naïve and 63 previously treated patients at 20 sites in Japan. All patients received sofosbuvir 400 mg plus ribavirin (weight‐based dosing) for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was sustained virologic response at 12 weeks after therapy (SVR12). Of the 153 patients enrolled and treated, 60% had HCV genotype 2a, 11% had cirrhosis, and 22% were over the aged 65 or older. Overall, 148 patients (97%) achieved SVR12. Of the 90 treatment‐naïve patients, 88 (98%) achieved SVR12, and of the 63 previously treated patients, 60 (95%) achieved SVR12. The rate of SVR12 was 94% in patients with cirrhosis and in those aged 65 and older. No patients discontinued study treatment due to adverse events. The most common adverse events were nasopharyngitis, anaemia and headache. Twelve weeks of sofosbuvir and ribavirin resulted in high rates of SVR12 in treatment‐naïve and previously treated patients with chronic genotype 2 HCV infection. The treatment was safe and well tolerated by patients, including the elderly and those with cirrhosis.     

Sofosbuvir/Velpatasvir Plus Ribavirin Combination Therapy for Patients with Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 1a, 2a,or 3b after Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir Therapy Failed

Glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (GLE/PIB) is a pan-genotype anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) therapy with high efficacy and safety. However, evidence supporting retreatment following failure of the GLE/PIB regimen is limited. We herein report 3 non-cirrhotic cases involving two men aged 51 and 58 years old and a woman aged 68 years old infected with HCV genotype 1a, 2a, and 3b respectively who failed anti-HCV therapies including GLE/PIB therapy. With combination therapy of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir plus ribavirin (SOF/VEL+RBV) for 24 weeks, all 3 patients had achieved a sustained viral response (SVR) at 24 weeks after completing treatment. SOF/VEL+RBV therapy was effective for retreatment of HCV after failure of GLE/PIB therapy.     

Sofosbuvir plus ribavirin in treatment‐naïve patients with chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 1 or 3 infection in India

Until 2014, pegylated interferon plus ribavirin was the recommended standard of care for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in India. This open‐label phase 3b study, conducted across 14 sites in India between 31 March 2014 and 30 November 2015, evaluated the efficacy and safety of sofosbuvir plus ribavirin therapy among treatment‐naïve patients with chronic genotype 1 or 3 HCV infection. A total of 117 patients with genotype 1 or 3 HCV infection were randomized 1:1 to receive sofosbuvir 400 mg and weight‐based ribavirin (1000 or 1200 mg) daily for 16 or 24 weeks. Among those with genotype 1 infection, the primary efficacy endpoint of sustained virologic response at 12 weeks post‐treatment (SVR12) was reported in 90% (95% confidence intervals [CI], 73‐98) and 96% (95% CI, 82‐100) of patients following 16 and 24 weeks of treatment, respectively. For patients with genotype 3 infection, SVR12 rates were 100% (95% CI, 88‐100) and 93% (95% CI, 78‐99) after 16 and 24 weeks of therapy, respectively. Adverse events, most of which were mild or moderate in severity, occurred in 69% and 57% of patients receiving 16 and 24 weeks of treatment, respectively. The most common treatment‐emergent adverse events were asthenia, headache and cough. Only one patient in the 24‐week group discontinued treatment with sofosbuvir during this study. Overall, sofosbuvir plus ribavirin therapy achieved SVR12 rates ≥90% and was well tolerated among treatment‐naïve patients with chronic genotype 1 or 3 HCV infection in India.     

Sofosbuvir/velpatasvir: A promising combination

Hepatitis C virus(HCV) affects 3% of the world population. It represents the main cause of chronic liver disease and is responsible for extra-hepatic complications, such as type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular diseases. HCV includes 7 genotypes differing in the nucleotide sequence variability, the geographic distribution, the rates of viral clearance, the risk of progression to liver fibrosis and to hepatocellular carcinoma, and the response to therapy. Last years have seen remarkable advances in the field of HCV infection with the approval of direct antiviral agents(DAAs) targeting key viral proteins involved in the HCV replication. Several oral regimens combining DAAs from different families have been developed and these regimens showed increased and sustained virological response rates to above 90% reducing the treatment duration to 12 wk or less. In particular, sofosbuvir, a nucleotide analogue nonstructural(NS)5B polymerase inhibitor, and velpatasvir, a NS5 A inhibitor, have been tested in two phase 3 trials, the ASTRAL-2(against HCV genotype 2) and the ASTRAL-3(against HCV genotype 3), demonstrating to be effective, safe, and well tolerated in patients who were 18 years of age or older and had at least a 6-mo history of HCV infection with a compensated liver disease.     

Sofosbuvir treatment and hepatitis C virus infection

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a serious problem worldwide. The use of interferon-based therapy has made HCV eradication challenging. The recent appearance of direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) has changed HCV therapy. Combining the use of DAAs with peginterferon and ribavirin has improved treatment efficacy. Furthermore, the combination of different orally administered DAAs has enabled interferon-free therapy with much higher efficacy and safety. In particular, sofosbuvir, a nucleotide-based NS5B inhibitor, prevents HCV RNA synthesis by acting as a “chain terminator”. Treatment with sofosbuvir has attained an extremely high rate of sustained virologic response. The current review summarizes the efficacy and safety of sofosbuvir therapy.     

Early post-liver transplant use of direct-acting antivirals in naive and NS5A inhibitor-experienced HCV patients

Direct-acting antiviral drugs (DAA) are safe and effective in the HCV population. However, in patients with decompensated cirrhosis and/or active hepatocellular carcinoma or relapse to NS5A inhibitors, response rates are lower and DAA therapy must be postponed until after liver transplant in an era of organ shortage and suboptimal donors. We aimed to assess the prevalence of patients still HCV infected at time of transplantation over the last 3 years in our Center and describe the safety and efficacy of DAA therapy started as soon as possible after surgery. We enrolled all HCV viraemic patients transplanted in our Centre from January 2019 to March 2022. The follow-up was closed in July 2022. Among 490 liver transplants, 49 (10%) patients were still HCV viraemic at operation, 43 naive to DAA and 6 were NS5A-experienced. Median donor age was 64 years; donor risk index was 1.8. In naive patients, sofosbuvir/velpatasvir was started after a median time of 1 day from surgery, while in NS5A-experienced sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir after 14.5 days (p = .001). Response rate was 98%. 1 NS5A-experienced patient experienced acute cholestatic hepatitis which promptly reverted after permanent DAA discontinuation. Hence, very early post-liver transplant HCV eradication was safe and effective thanks to a close teamwork which involved anaesthesiologists, transplant surgeons and hepatologists.     

Sustained virological response with 16‐week glecaprevir/pibrentasvir after failure to sofosbuvir/velpatasvir in post‐transplant severe HCV recurrence in HIV

Direct‐acting antivirals (DAAs) demonstrated high efficacy and safety even in the post‐liver transplant (LT) setting and in HIV‐infected patients, but data are very limited in the early post‐LT period with the most recently available DAA. Two HIV/HCV‐coinfected LT recipients (both grafts from HIV/HCV‐negative donors) experienced early HCV recurrence with severe hepatitis and were treated with sofosbuvir/velpatasvir for 12 weeks. Unfortunately, both patients failed: one (genotype 4d) showed virological breakthrough at week 3 with resistance‐associated substitutions (RASs) for both NS5A and NS5B, while the other (genotype 1a) experienced virological relapse without RAS. Both progressed to fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis and were successfully retreated with glecaprevir/pibrentasvir for 16 weeks achieving sustained virological response. The higher prevalence of RAS in experienced genotype 4 patients and the long time to viral suppression observed in subjects with fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis should be taken into account, considering longer treatment duration to increase the chances of achieving sustained virological response.     

Safety and efficacy of coblopasvir and sofosbuvir in patients with genotypes 1, 2, 3 and 6 HCV infections without or with compensated cirrhosis

A simple, pangenotypic and effective treatment regimen for patients with a broad range of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections remains an unmet medical need. We conducted a phase 2, randomized, open study involving untreated patients with chronic HCV genotypes 1, 2, 3, or 6 infections. Patients without cirrhosis were randomly assigned in a 1:2 ratio to receive capsules of the NS5A inhibitor coblopasvir at a dose of 30 or 60 mg plus tablets of the nucleotide polymerase inhibitor sofosbuvir (400 mg) once daily for 12 weeks. Patients with cirrhosis received 60 mg coblopasvir plus sofosbuvir for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was the sustained virologic response at 12 weeks after the end of therapy (SVR12). Of the 110 patients who were enrolled in the study, 59 were male, 62.7% had HCV genotype 1, 24.5% had genotype 2, 6.4% had genotype 3, and 6.4% had genotype 6. The average age was 45.5 years. A total of 10.9% of patients had compensated cirrhosis. The rate of SVR12 was 98.2% in the intention‐to‐treat (ITT). One genotype 6 patient with cirrhosis experienced virologic relapse. One genotype 2 patient without cirrhosis failed to complete the follow‐up and quit the study. Serious adverse events (SAEs) were reported in 2 patients and were not related to coblopasvir and sofosbuvir. Most adverse events (AEs) did not require treatment. Coblopasvir plus sofosbuvir taken once daily for 12 weeks provided high rates of sustained virologic response (SVR) and had a good safety profile among patients with HCV genotypes 1, 2, 3, or 6 infections, including those with compensated cirrhosis.     

Persistence of Virologic Response after Liver Transplant in Hepatitis C Patients Treated with Ledipasvir/Sofosbuvir Plus Ribavirin Pretransplant

IntroductionRecurrence of HCV infection in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) at the time of liver transplantation is nearly universal and reduces the likelihood of graft and patient survival.Materials and methodsWe evaluated outcomes of 17 patients (16 with HCV genotype 1 and 1 with genotype 4) who received up to 12 or 24 weeks of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir plus ribavirin prior to or up to the time of liver transplant in the SOLAR-1 and SOLAR-2 trials. In all patients, HCV RNA was < 15 IU/mL prior to transplant. At screening, 6 patients were Child-Pugh-Turcotte (CPT) class B and 11 were CPT class C. Seven patients underwent transplant prior to completing assigned treatment, with 4 treated for < 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was posttransplant virologic response 12 weeks after transplant (pTVR12) in patients with HCV RNA < 15 IU/mL at their last measurement prior to transplant.ResultsOverall, 94% (16/17) achieved pTVR12. All who achieved pTVR12 received at least 11 weeks of treatment. The single patient who did not achieve pTVR12 discontinued study drug on day 21 and underwent liver transplant the following day. The patient had HCV RNA < 15 IU/mL at post-transplant week 2 but died 15 days post-transplant because of multi-organ failure and septic shock.ConclusionAmong a small population of HCV patients with decompensated cirrhosis, virologic response to ledipasvir / so-fosbuvir plus ribavirin prior to liver transplantation was maintained after transplantation, even if treatment was stopped early. Administration of ledipasvir / sofosbuvir plus ribavirin before liver transplant can prevent post-transplant HCV recurrence.