Late motor involvement in cases presenting as “chronic sensory demyelinating polyneuropathy”

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is usually characterized by prominent motor deficits. A pure sensory presentation, labeled chronic sensory demyelinating neuropathy (CSDN), has been reported, but it is unclear if this neuropathy is a distinct clinical and immunologic entity or merely the sensory presentation of the more usual sensorimotor CIDP. We describe 5 patients with what initially appeared to be CSDN; 3 subsequently developed substantial weakness coincident with the electrophysiologic appearance of multifocal motor conduction block. These cases indicate that, in some cases, CSDN may be a transitional clinical stage of CIDP in which the more usual sensorimotor deficits develop later. Immune-based therapy, including intravenous immunoglobulin, was found to be effective in both the pure sensory and sensorimotor types. © 1995 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Treatment of immune-mediated, dysimmune neuropathies

This review focuses on the actual status and recent advances in the treatment of immune-mediated neuropathies, including: Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS) with its subtypes acute inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy, acute motor axonal neuropathy, acute motor and sensory axonal neuropathy, Miller Fisher syndrome, and acute pandysautonomia; chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) with its subtypes classical CIDP, CIDP with diabetes, CIDP/monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS), sensory CIDP, multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN), multifocal acquired demyelinating sensory and motor neuropathy or Lewis-Sumner syndrome, multifocal acquired sensory and motor neuropathy, and distal acquired demyelinating sensory neuropathy; IgM monoclonal gammopathies with its subtypes Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia, myelin-associated glycoprotein-associated gammopathy, polyneuropathy, organomegaly, endocrinopathy, M-protein, skin changes syndrome, mixed cryoglobulinemia, gait ataxia, late-onset polyneuropathy syndrome, and MGUS. Concerning the treatment of GBS, there is no significant difference between intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG), plasma exchange or plasma exchange followed by IVIG. Because of convenience and absent invasiveness, IVIG are usually preferred. In treating CIDP corticosteroids, IVIG, or plasma exchange are equally effective. Despite the high costs and relative lack of availability, IVIG are preferentially used. For the one-third of patients, who does not respond, other immunosuppressive options are available. In MMN IVIG are the treatment of choice. Inadequate response in 20% of the patients requires adjunctive immunosuppressive therapies. Neuropathies with IgM monoclonal gammopathy may respond to various chemotherapeutic agents, although the long-term effects are unknown. In addition, such treatment may be associated with serious side effects. Recent data support the use of rituximab, a monoclonal antibody against the B-cell surface-membrane-marker CD20.     

Clinical spectrum of chronic acquired demyelinating polyneuropathies

A number of presentations of chronic demyelinating polyneuropathy have been identified, each distinguished by its phenotypic pattern. In addition to classic chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP), which is characterized clinically by symmetric proximal and distal weakness and sensory loss, several regional variants can be recognized: multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN: asymmetric and pure motor), multifocal acquired demyelinating sensory and motor (MADSAM) neuropathy (asymmetric, sensory, and motor), and distal acquired demyelinating symmetric (DADS) neuropathy (symmetric, distal, sensory, and motor). There are also temporal, pathological, and disease-associated variants. This review describes a clinical scheme for approaching the chronic acquired demyelinating polyneuropathies that leads to a rational use of supportive laboratory studies and treatment options. In addition, we propose new diagnostic criteria for CIDP that more accurately reflect current clinical practice.     

"Chronic sensory demyelinating neuropathy": chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy presenting as a pure sensory neuropathy.

The clinical electrophysiological and histological features of 10 cases of "chronic sensory demyelinating neuropathy" (CSDN) are reported. This entity is characterised by: 1) subacute or chronic progression; 2) pure sensory neuropathy; 3) high spinal fluid protein in the majority of cases; 4) electrophysiological evidence of demyelination affecting motor as well as sensory nerve fibres; 5) demyelination on sural nerve biopsy and 6) good response to immunotherapy in progressive phase. It is believed that this entity represents chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) presenting as pure sensory neuropathy.     

Motor and sensory demyelinating mononeuropathy multiplex (multifocal motor and sensory demyelinating neuropathy): a separate entity or a variant of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy?

We report 16 patients with motor and sensory demyelinating mononeuropathy multiplex (MSDMM) or multifocal motor and sensory demyelinating neuropathy (MMSDN). These patients had the clinical pattern of motor and sensory mononeuropathy multiplex, electrophysiological evidence of demyelination including conduction block, and segmental demyelination in the sural nerve biopsy. Sixty per cent of patients had high CSF protein. Eighty per cent of patients showed good responsiveness to steroid treatment. Unlike multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN), MSDMM is characterized by a shorter course, sensory deficits and sensory nerve conduction abnormalities, absence of GM1 antibody in most patients tested, and a good response to steroid therapy. We believe that MSDMM represents a variant of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) and an intermediate link between CIDP and MMN.     

Chronic dysimmune neuropathies: Beyond chronic demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy

The spectrum of chronic dysimmune neuropathies has widened well beyond chronic demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP). Pure motor (multifocal motor neuropathy), sensorimotor with asymmetrical involvement (multifocal acquired demylinating sensory and motor neuropathy), exclusively distal sensory (distal acquired demyelinating sensory neuropathy) and very proximal sensory (chronic immune sensory polyradiculopathy) constitute the variants of CIDP. Correct diagnosis of these entities is of importance in terms of initiation of appropriate therapy as well as prognostication of these patients. The rates of detection of immune-mediated neuropathies with monoclonal cell proliferation (monoclonal gammopathy of unknown significance, multiple myeloma, etc.) have been facilitated as better diagnostic tools such as serum immunofixation electrophoresis are being used more often. Immune neuropathies associated with malignancies and systemic vasculitic disorders are being defined further and treated early with better understanding of the disease processes. As this field of dysimmune neuropathies will evolve in the future, some of the curious aspects of the clinical presentations and response patterns to different immunosuppressants or immunomodulators will be further elucidated. This review also discusses representative case studies.     

Multifocal acquired demyelinating sensory and motor neuropathy: report of a case and review of the literature

Multifocal acquired demyelinating sensory and motor (MADSAM) neuropathy is characterized by an asymmetric multifocal pattern of motor and sensory loss, and conduction block and other features of demyelination in nerve conduction studies. MADSAM neuropathy needs to be differentiated from chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) and multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN). In classic CIDP, there are symmetric proximal and distal weakness, sensory deficit in both upper and lower extremities and reduced deep tendon reflex. In MMN, limb weakness without sensory loss is asymmetric in the distribution of individual peripheral nerves and the weakness typically begins in the distal upper extremities. We report one patient with chronic progression of asymmetric numbness and weakness in four extremities. MADSAM neuropathy was diagnosed after extensive clinical and laboratory evaluations. It is very important to distinguish between CIDP, MADSAM neuropathy, and MMN by clinical, laboratory, and histological features because of different effective therapeutic strategies.     

Chronic dysimmune neuropathy

The Chronic Dysimmune neuropathies (CDN) are a clinically heterogeneous group of polyneuropathies united by their presumed immune mediated aetiology. At present such neuropathies are classified as Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy (CIDP), Multifocal Motor Neuropathy (MMN) and the Neuropathies in association with serum Paraproteins (Paraproteinaemic Neuropathies). This classification fails to recognise other distinctive syndromes and is limited by heterogeneity within, and overlap between, subgroups. We have refined this clinical subclassification by a review of a consecutive series of 102 unselected patients with CDN referred to a single neurologist. We recognise 6 clinical subtypes of CDN: one sensory ataxic group; three motor-sensory subgroups (chronic motor sensory demyelinating neuropathy, subacute motor sensory demyelinating neuropathy and a multifocal motor sensory neuropathy); and two pure motor subgroups (symmetric pure motor demyelinating neuropathy and multifocal motor neuropathy). This subclassification allows distinct syndromes to be recognised and helps resolve problems of heterogeneity and overlap. Distinction between these subgroups is of immediate practical relevance to patient management. Although steroids are beneficial for most of the subgroups, this is not so for both of the pure motor syndromes which should be treated with intravenous immunoglobulin. Patients with chronic development of Motor Sensory Demyelinating Neuropathy respond less well to steroids than those with a subacute onset. An association was found between elderly patients with Subacute Motor Sensory Demyelinating Neuropathy and carcinomas. Within any clinical subgroup patients behave similarly regardless of the presence of associated paraproteins or nerve specific antibodies. Received: 19 March 2002, Received in revised form: 2 January 2003, Accepted: 13 January 2003 Correspondence to: Dr. M. Donaghy     

Non‐anti‐MAG DADS neuropathy as a variant of CIDP: clinical,electrophysiological, laboratory features and response to treatment in 10 cases

Background and purpose: Some patients within the spectrum of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathies (CIDP) have distal acquired demyelinating symmetric (DADS) neuropathy, usually associated with anti‐myelin‐associated‐glycoprotein (MAG) IgM monoclonal gammopathy. The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate patients with DADS neuropathy without anti‐MAG antibodies, and study their response to immunotherapy. Methods: Patients were selected on the basis of (i) ‘Definite CIDP’ according to the EFNS/PNS Guideline criteria, (ii) The presence of disproportionately prolonged motor latencies resulting in a terminal latency index (TLI) ≤0.25 in at least two motor nerves and (iii) The absence of anti‐MAG antibodies on ELISA. Response to immunotherapy was defined as persistent improvement by at least one point on the INCAT disability score. Results: Data from 146 CIDP patients were analysed, and 10 patients were included. Six had clinically pure sensory neuropathy, and four had sensorimotor neuropathy. Ataxia was present in nine patients, generalized areflexia in seven and postural tremor in two. Five of the 10 patients had abnormal sensory potentials only in the upper limbs. An associated condition was found in nine patients: two chronic lymphocytic leukaemias, four IgG monoclonal gammopathies (one associated with non‐Hodgkin’s lymphoma) and two IgM monoclonal gammopathies of unknown significance. Patients were mostly improved with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg), corticosteroids, plasma exchanges, or a combination thereof. Conclusion: DADS neuropathy without anti‐MAG antibodies is more likely to be considered a variant of CIDP. In addition, such patients should be systematically investigated for an associated haematological or immunological condition.     

Minimal and asymptomatic chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy.

OBJECTIVES: Show the chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is not only clinically heterogeneous but extremely variable in severity. METHODS: Three patients were referred for mild distal paresthesiae lasting more than 6 months and one for inguinal and thigh pain later ascribed to coxarthrosis. Strength was normal in all patients and tactile sensation reduced distally only in one. Tendon jerks were absent, except the knee jerks in one patient, reduced in lower limbs in two and normal in one. RESULTS: Electrophysiology showed a demyelinating neuropathy without motor conduction block. CSF protein content was increased in all patients. Nerve biopsies showed de-remyelination with varying degrees of axonal loss. Genetic studies excluded a demyelinating neuropathy associated with duplication or deletion of the 17p.11.2 segment. CONCLUSIONS: CIDP patients with pure sensory clinical presentation have been described but are generally more severely impaired. However, because of the mildness of symptoms and the unequivocal electrophysiological involvement of motor fibers, we think that in these cases the term minimal CIDP is more appropriate than sensory CIDP. These cases represent the most benign end of the CIDP spectrum. In our series minimal or even asymptomatic CIDP encompasses 8% of cases.     

Acute-onset multifocal motor neuropathy (AMMN): how we meet the diagnosis

Multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) usually progresses insidiously with lower motor neuron-type weakness, minimal or no sensory symptoms. Diagnostic criteria include motor conduction block (CB) at sites not exposed to compression or entrapment. CBs may persist or reverse irrespective of clinical outcome. Acute onset with generalized weakness is uncommon. We report four patients who presented acutely areflexia, pure motor deficits without sensory disturbances, multifocal CBs persisting at the same motor nerves on serial electrophysiological studies. Three patients had preceding infections; two showed IgM reactivity against the ganglioside GM1. Intravenous immuneglobulin (IVIg) improved or stabilized symptoms. Patients 2,3,4 receive maintenance therapy with IVIg for years. Acute-onset MMN (AMMN) should be differentiated from other immune-mediated neuropathies such as acute inflammatory polyneuropathy either demyelinating (AIDP) or axonal (AMAN), acute motor conduction block neuropathy (AMCBN), acute-onset chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP). The correct diagnosis deserves implications for patient long-term treatment and prognosis. Moreover, the authors address the problem of defining the spectrum of MMN particularly in the acute setting.     

Nerve ultrasound protocol in differentiating chronic immune‐mediated neuropathies

Introduction: In this study we evaluated a new neuropathy ultrasound protocol (NUP) for differentiating chronic immune‐mediated neuropathies. Methods: The NUP was evaluated in 110 patients with clinical presentations of chronic immune‐mediated neuropathy. All patients were first evaluated clinically and electrophysiologically and divided into 4 polyneuropathy groups: (a) symmetric demyelinating; (b) symmetric axonal; (c) asymmetric demyelinating; and (d) asymmetric axonal. During step 2, the NUP was evaluated prospectively for all 4 study groups. Results: Overall, the NUP led to correct classification in 42 of 49 (85.7%) patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP), 13 of 15 (86.9%) with multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN), and 5 of 5 (100%) with multifocal‐acquired demyelinating sensory and motor neuropathy (MADSAM). The NUP had >80% sensitivity and specificity in distinguishing CIDP, MMN, and MADSAM in all 4 study groups. Conclusions: The NUP is a useful addition in the differential diagnosis of chronic immune‐mediated neuropathies in everyday practice. Muscle Nerve 54 : 864–871, 2016     

Motor chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) in 17 patients: Clinical characteristics,electrophysiological study,and response to treatment

Motor chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is a rare and poorly described subtype of CIDP. We aimed to study their clinical and electrophysiological characteristics and response to treatment. From a prospective database of CIDP patients, we included patients with definite or probable CIDP with motor signs and without sensory signs/symptoms at diagnosis. Patients were considered to have pure motor CIDP (PM‐CIDP) if sensory conductions were normal or to have motor predominant CIDP (MPred‐CIDP) if ≥2 sensory nerve action potential amplitudes were abnormal. Among the 700 patients with CIDP, 17 (2%) were included (PM‐CIDP n = 7, MPred‐CIDP n = 10); 71% were male, median age at onset was 48 years (range: 13‐76 years), 47% had an associated inflammatory or infectious disease or neoplasia. At the more severe disease stage, 94% of patients had upper and lower limb weakness, with distal and proximal weakness in 4 limbs for 56% of them. Three‐quarters (75%) responded to intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg) and four of five patients to corticosteroids including three of three patients with MPred‐CIDP. The most frequent conduction abnormalities were conduction blocks (CB, 82%) and F‐wave abnormalities (88%). During follow up, 4 of 10 MPred‐CIDP patients developed mild sensory symptoms; none with PM‐CIDP did so. Patients with PM‐CIDP had poorer outcome (median ONLS: 4; range: 22‐5) compared to MPred‐CIDP (2, range: 0‐4; P = .03) at last follow up. This study found a progressive clinical course in the majority of patients with motor CIDP as well as frequent associated diseases, CB, and F‐wave abnormalities. Corticosteroids might be considered as a therapeutic option in resistant IVIg patients with MPred‐CIDP.     

Utility of somatosensory evoked potentials in chronic acquired demyelinating neuropathy

Chronic acquired demyelinating polyneuropathy (CADP) is a heterogeneous syndrome that may be classified into a number of subtypes. Somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) assess proximal segments of sensory nerves, inadequately assessed by routine nerve conduction studies (NCSs). The aim of the present study was to determine the utility of SSEPs in diagnosing and classifying different CADP subtypes. Forty-seven patients with CADP were studied and classified in five groups based on conventional NCSs and SSEPs. Some patients in Group 1 were initially misdiagnosed as having either motor neuron disease or multifocal motor neuropathy due to normal sensory NCSs, but they exhibited abnormal tibial and median nerve SSEPs, as evidenced by marked prolongation or absence of peripheral potentials (N9-median nerve, and N20-tibial nerve). These were reclassified as having chronic inflammatory demyelinating neuropathy (CIDP). In CIDP patients (Group 2), SSEPs were abnormal, thereby confirming the presence of demyelination in the proximal peripheral nerves. Patients with distal acquired demyelinating neuropathy (DADS) (Group 3), as defined by conventional NCS, exhibited abnormal SSEPs when anti-MAG antibodies were present. Anti-MAG-negative DADS patients (Group 3) had normal SSEPs. In the pure sensory ataxic group (Group 4), SSEP studies disclosed poorly formed and delayed cortical potentials with absent lumbar (N20) potentials, thereby suggesting the presence of proximal demyelination. SSEPs were normal in the pure motor CIDP and multifocal motor neuropathy patients (MMN) (Group 5), thereby differentiating asymmetric forms of CIDP from MMN. These findings suggest that SSEPs may be an important complementary investigation to conventional NCSs in the diagnosis of CADP.     

The extent of the clinical manifestations of chronic polyradiculoneuropathy

BACKGROUND: Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy is an autoimmune disease that target myelin sheats of peripheral nerves. Its diagnosis is often difficult to make, and a number of cases are probably not identified because of the clinical heterogeneity. Numerous sets of diagnostic criteria have sought to define CIDP but clinical criteria are generally not detailed. OBJECTIVES: To review the main clinical characteristics suggestive of CIDP (that means not compatible with a length-dependent axonal process) and the critical clinical points of the neuropathy which make the differential diagnosis with the main other forms of chronic auto immune neuropathy sometimes difficult. RESULTS: The main clinical characteristic are: a symmetric proximal and distal motor weakness predominantly affecting the lower limbs, a diffuse areflexia, a sensory deficit characterized by a preferential involvement of large fibers, an evolution which may be either chronic progressive or recurrent. These aspects raise many questions concerning overlap with other inflammatory neuropathies such as Guillain Barre syndrome, Lewis-Sumner neuropathy, chronic ataxic neuropathy. The distinction of a subgroup of CIDP associated with other diseases such as diabetes or HIV are also controversial. CONCLUSION: The growing body of knowledge on the pathogenesis of CIDP and clinical or electrophysiological differentiation of subforms may help to develop more effective therapies for CIDP in the next few years.     

Current treatments of chronic immune‐mediated demyelinating polyneuropathies

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP), multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN), and anti–myelin‐associated glycoprotein (anti‐MAG) neuropathy are three demyelinating acquired neuropathies, with distinct responses to immunotherapy. In placebo‐controlled, double‐blind, randomized trials, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) has been effective for CIDP and MMN, and plasmapheresis has been effective for CIDP. Corticosteroids have been beneficial in controlled trials for CIDP. Other agents, including cyclophosphamide, rituximab, azathioprine, cyclosporine, interferons, fludarabine, mycophenolate mofetil, and etanercept, have been reported to benefit some patients with inflammatory demyelinating neuropathies in case series and case reports. This review examines the use and toxicity associated with these immunotherapy medications in treating patients with chronic immune‐mediated demyelinating neuropathies. Muscle Nerve, 2009     

Rituximab in chronic immune mediated neuropathies: a systematic review

Chronic immune mediated neuropathy is a heterogenous group of peripheral nerve diseases, encompassing chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP), autoimmune nodopathy, multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN), and anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein (MAG) neuropathy. Rituximab (RTX) is a chimeric monoclonal antibody targeting the CD20 antigen, which has been used in the treatment of autoimmune neuropathies, although the efficacy of RTX remains unclear. A literature search was performed using Medline, Embase and Cochrane Register for studies between 2000 and 2021 using the search terms “Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy” OR “Multifocal motor neuropathy” OR “Myelin associated glycoprotein” OR “Distal acquired demyelinating neuropathy” OR “Multifocal acquired demyelinating sensory and motor neuropathy” OR “demyelinating neuropathy” AND “Rituximab”. Twenty-three studies were included, of which two were randomised controlled trials, 6 prospective studies and 15 retrospective studies. RTX was effective in 63% of CIDP patients, 48% of anti-MAG neuropathy, and 96% of patients with autoimmune nodopathy. Neurophysiological improvement was evident in 58% of CIDP and 40% of anti-MAG neuropathy patients. Low rates of serious adverse events (2.6%) were observed. These results indicate that RTX has potential as a treatment in immune mediated polyneuropathy, although the quality of evidence supporting its use it poor. Randomized controlled trials are required to reliably establish the efficacy and safety of RTX. Trial registration number: CRD42020179666.     

Activity-dependent hyperpolarization and conduction block in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy

Voluntary activity produces activity-dependent hyperpolarization of the active motor axons. The present study investigated whether this hyperpolarization produces conduction block in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP). Studies were performed in 10 healthy control subjects, 7 patients with CIDP, and 3 patients with multifocal motor neuropathy. The compound muscle action potential (CMAP) of the abductor pollicis brevis was recorded in response to supramaximal stimuli to the median nerve at the wrist, alternating with measurements of axonal excitability. After a maximal voluntary contraction for 60 seconds, the amplitude of the maximal CMAP was significantly reduced in symptomatic CIDP patients by 40%, but there were only slight changes in the CMAPs of healthy controls, asymptomatic CIDP patients, and multifocal motor neuropathy patients. In symptomatic CIDP patients, the activity-dependent conduction block paralleled the activity-dependent hyperpolarization and was presumably precipitated by it. In these patients, the safety margin for impulse conduction was estimated to be about 12%. Activity-dependent conduction block may be clinically important in chronic demyelinating diseases and can be demonstrated electrophysiologically if testing occurs across pathological sites.     

Office immunotherapy in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy and multifocal motor neuropathy

Intravenous immunoglobulin [IVIg], plasma exchange [PE], and corticosteroids are efficacious treatment in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy [CIDP]. IVIg is effective in multifocal motor neuropathy [MMN]. NIS, NIS‐weakness, sum scores of raw amplitudes of motor fiber (CMAPs) amplitudes, and Dyck/Rankin score provided reliable measures to detect and scale abnormality and reflect change; they are therefore ideal for office management of response‐based immunotherapy (R‐IRx) of CIDP. Using efficacious R‐IRx, a large early and late therapeutic response (≥ one‐fourth were in remission or had recovered) was demonstrated in CIDP. In MMN only an early improvement with late non‐significant worsening was observed. The difference in immunotherapy response supports a fundamental difference between CIDP (immune attack on Schwann cells and myelin) and MMN (attack on nodes of Ranvier and axons). Muscle Nerve 52: 488–497, 2015     

Pure motor chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy

We describe four patients affected by chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) in a pure motor form. Selective involvement of motor fibers was suggested by the absence of sensory symptoms, normal sensation at neurological examination and normal findings on electrophysiological testing of sensory fibres and sural nerve biopsy. The onset of the disease occurred at a young age (3–29 years) and the clinical course was relapsing-remitting. Over a follow-up periode of 1.5–14 years, periodical clinical and electrophysiological examinations showed that selective involvement of motor fibers remained a constant feature. Electromyography and nerve conduction studies continued to show a purely demyelinating neuropathy without signs of axonal impairment. All patients were steroid-unresponsive, whereas they considerably improved after being treated with immunoglobulins. Two patients were treated with interferon alpha and showed a good response. In conclusion, the occurrence in our four patients of pure motor involvement over a long period of time during which several relapses occurred, suggests that pure motor CIDP may represent the result of a specific immunological process rather than of a random distribution of inflammation throughout peripheral nerves. Received: 21 December 2000 / Received in revised form: 2 February 2001 / Accepted: 10 March 2001