Common postoperative anatomy that requires special endoscopic consideration

Technological advancements have continued to expand the utility of flexible endoscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal disorders [1]. While the majority of these procedures occur in patients with native anatomy, the cohort of patients with surgically altered gastrointestinal anatomy continues to rise. Understanding the types of and variations of surgically-altered anatomy is paramount to effectively performing endoscopy in the postsurgical patient, as the anatomic rearrangements have implications to procedural safety and success. Additionally, the ability to distinguish “normal” from “abnormal” from “abnormally abnormal” postoperative findings is essential to correctly identify and report problems.This article will describe common postsurgical anatomy that the endoscopist is likely to encounter. We describe normal and abnormal findings and detail technical considerations for obtaining accurate diagnostic information and performing therapeutic procedures vis-à-vis specific anatomical changes. Additionally, we highlight the essential components of specific endoscopic evaluations and outline methods to more effectively communicate such information to the referring provider (with particular focus on communicating anatomical findings with a surgeon).     

Sustainability in gastroenterology and digestive endoscopy: Position Paper from the Italian Association of Hospital Gastroenterologists and Digestive Endoscopists (AIGO)

Climate crisis is dramatically changing life on earth. Environmental sustainability and waste management are rapidly gaining centrality in quality improvement strategies of healthcare, especially in procedure-dominant fields such as gastroenterology and digestive endoscopy. Therefore, healthcare interventions and endoscopic procedures must be evaluated through the ‘triple bottom line’ of financial, social, and environmental impact. The purpose of the paper is to provide information on the carbon footprint of gastroenterology and digestive endoscopy and outline a set of measures that the sector can take to reduce the emission of greenhouse gases while improving patient outcomes. Scientific societies, hospital executives, single endoscopic units can structure health policies and investment to build a “green endoscopy”. The AIGO study group reinforces the role of gastrointestinal endoscopy professionals as advocates of sustainability in digestive endoscopy. The “green endoscopy” can shape a more sustainable health service and lead to an equitable, climate-smart, and healthier future.     

A Canadian clinical practice algorithm for the management of patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

AIM: To use current evidence-based recommendations to provide a user-friendly clinical algorithm for the management of upper gastrointestinal bleeding, adapted to the Canadian environment. METHODS: A multidisciplinary consensus group of 25 participants representing 11 national societies used a seven-step approach to develop recommendations according to accepted standards. Sources of data included narrative and systematic reviews as well as published and new meta-analyses. A small writing subgroup subsequently created the algorithm. RESULTS: Recommendations emphasize appropriate initial resuscitation of the patient and a multidisciplinary approach to clinical risk stratification that determines the need for early endoscopy. Early endoscopy allows safe and prompt discharge of selected patients classified as low risk. Endoscopic hemostasis is reserved for patients with high-risk endoscopic lesions. Although monotherapy with injection or thermal coagulation is effective, the combination is superior to either treatment alone. High-dose intravenous proton-pump inhibition is recommended in patients who have undergone successful endoscopic therapy. Routine second-look endoscopy is not recommended. Patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding secondary to ulcer disease should be tested and treated for Helicobacter pylori infection. CONCLUSIONS: This algorithm should facilitate appropriate risk stratification, use of endoscopic therapy and the appropriate utilization of proton-pump inhibition to optimize the care of patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding. The algorithm should be customized to the resources of individual medical centres. Its application should be studied with appropriate outcomes recorded and validation performed.     

Endoskopie des oberen Gastrointestinaltrakts

Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) has replaced X-ray diagnosis as the standard method for assessment of the upper gastrointestinal tract. It also offers an array of minimally invasive treatment options. This contribution presents the requisite medical, technical, and human resources needed for EGD. The indication for this invasive procedure should always be carefully reviewed and contraindications excluded. EGD should be performed according to standardized procedures and well documented by noting distinctive features of peristalsis and describing alterations of mucosal size and surface texture. The endoscopic techniques of biopsy, chromoendoscopy, and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy should always be available in routine endoscopy.     

Endoscopy of the upper gastrointestinal tract

Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) has replaced X-ray diagnosis as the standard method for assessment of the upper gastrointestinal tract. It also offers an array of minimally invasive treatment options. This contribution presents the requisite medical, technical, and human resources needed for EGD. The indication for this invasive procedure should always be carefully reviewed and contraindications excluded. EGD should be performed according to standardized procedures and well documented by noting distinctive features of peristalsis and describing alterations of mucosal size and surface texture. The endoscopic techniques of biopsy, chromoendoscopy, and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy should always be available in routine endoscopy.     

"Test, score and scope": a selection strategy for safe reduction of upper gastrointestinal endoscopies in young dyspeptic patients referred from primary care

OBJECTIVE: To test the ability of pre-endoscopic clinical evaluation to predict clinically relevant findings of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients (341) who had been referred to upper gastrointestinal endoscopy for further evaluation of dyspeptic symptoms were included in this prospective, single-blinded study. Prior to endoscopy, the patients underwent a standardized clinical evaluation consisting of 1) a symptom questionnaire, 2) serological testing for Helicobacter pylori antibody and 3) determination of blood hemoglobin. Based upon this evaluation, patients were assigned to one of three defined risk groups. Group A comprised patients with known risk factors for diseases that would require further therapeutic or diagnostic management. Patients in groups B and C had no such risk factors. Patients in group C had heartburn or regurgitation as a predominant symptom, whereas patients in group B did not. The prevalence of clinically relevant findings upon upper endoscopy was then compared for these three groups. RESULTS: The prevalence of clinically relevant endoscopic findings in risk groups A, B and C were 20.1, 2.4 and 1.6%, respectively (p<0.01 for both A versus B and A versus C). Furthermore, 89% of those with clinically relevant endoscopic findings belonged to group A, which comprised a total of 45% of the patients studied. In groups B and C, the prevalence of disease was similar to the area-specific prevalence in the general population without dyspeptic symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: By using a simple standardized questionnaire, H. pylori serology and a hemoglobin reading in the evaluation of dyspeptic patients under 45 years of age, the need for endoscopy can be reduced by 55%.     

Oesophageal reflux tests, manometry, endoscopy, biopsy, and radiology in healthy subjects

The aim was to study the exposure time of acid during 24 h at two different oesophageal levels in 15 healthy subjects and its relation to other kinds of oesophageal findings. Five centimetres above the lower oesophageal sphincter the total reflux time was 0.2% (0-1.3%), and at the 15-cm level it was 0.1% (0-0.7%). A standardized compression test during manometry and radiologic examination showed that no subject had reflux. Hiatus hernia was provoked at the radiologic examination in four subjects, one of whom also had a widened hiatus. At endoscopy, one subject had a hiatus hernia and slightly granulated oesophageal mucosa. Biopsy specimens showed slight basal cell hyperplasia in one case. Bleeding in the dermal papillae or a few intraepithelial leukocytes were seen in eight cases, findings that might be due to endoscopic trauma. Without any history of gastrointestinal disorders, gastrooesophageal reflux was minimal under standardized conditions, although hiatus hernia and mild changes in biopsy specimens could be seen.     

Characteristics of Australian after-hours emergency endoscopy services

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Early endoscopic intervention reduces morbidity and mortality for patients with high-risk gastrointestinal hemorrhage and gallstones causing pancreatitis or ascending cholangitis. For low-risk bleeds 'after-hours' endoscopy services allow risk stratification and early, safe discharge leading to reduced length of stay. Recognized standards for these services include availability of endoscopically trained medical and nursing staff, access to a specialized endoscopy unit and full availability of the service. The aim of the present study was to assess 'after-hours' endoscopy services at Australian teaching hospitals using the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) criteria. METHODS: A standardized questionnaire based on the BSG guidelines was developed. The Gastroenterology Society of Australia provided a list of accredited sites for gastroenterology training. An advanced gastroenterology trainee at each hospital was interviewed by telephone. RESULTS: Thirty-four centers (100%) provided complete data. Gastroscopy, colonoscopy and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography were provided in 100, 58 and 84% of centers, respectively. The operation suite followed by endoscopy unit was the most frequently used site. However, one-third of centers performed procedures at the bedside, including the emergency department or ward. Support staff were not consistently trained endoscopically and, in 15 centers (44%), the advanced trainees participated in the 'on call' roster with a consultant present for the procedure, although this was not consistently the case. CONCLUSIONS: Most Australian hospitals offer comprehensive emergency endoscopy services. However, few centers fulfill all BSG recommendations. The registrar training and patient safety implications of emergency endoscopic services need to be considered in the light of these findings.     

Endoscopic therapy in early adenocarcinomas (Barrett's cancer) of the esophagus

The incidence of early esophageal adenocarcinoma has been increasing significantly in recent decades. Prognosis depends greatly on the choice of treatment. Early cancers can be treated by endoscopic resection, whereas advanced carcinomas have to be sent for surgery. Esophageal resection is associated with high perioperative mortality (1–5%) even in specialized centers. Early diagnosis enables curative endoscopic treatment option. Patients with gastrointestinal symptoms and a familial risk for esophageal cancer should undergo upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. High‐definition endoscopes have been developed with technical add‐on that helps endoscopists to find fine irregularities in the esophageal mucosa, but interpreting the findings remains challenging. In this review we discussed novel and old diagnostic procedures and their values, as well as our own recommendations and those of the authors discussed for the diagnosis and treatment of early Barrett's carcinoma. Endoscopic resection is the therapy of choice in early esophageal adenocarcinoma. It is mandatory to perform a subsequent ablation of all residual Barrett's mucosa to avoid metachronous lesions.     

胃肠道间质瘤治疗新方法的探讨

目的探讨胃镜与腹腔镜双镜联合及内镜黏膜下挖除术(endoscopic submucosal excavation,ESE)治疗胃肠道间质瘤的效果和安全性。方法经胃(肠)镜、超声内镜及病理学、免疫组化证实的胃肠道间质瘤患者37例,对其中28例患者采用ESE、9例采用胃镜与腹腔镜双镜联合进行瘤体切除。结果 ESE及双镜联合治疗的所有患者均完整切除瘤体,两种方法均无术中及术后迟发性出血、剧烈腹痛等并发症,瘤体位于贲门者,切除后患者贲门功能保持良好,术后随访无复发。结论胃镜与腹腔镜双镜联合技术及ESE是治疗胃肠道间质瘤的微创、安全、有效的新方法。     

Changes in indications for upper gastrointestinal tract endoscopy and endoscopic findings during the last fifteen years in south-western Greece

BACKGROUND: During the past years, major advances in the management of upper gastrointestinal diseases have been achieved. The aim of this study was to determine if changes in indications for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and endoscopic findings have occurred during the last 15 years in our area. METHODS: Indications for upper gastrointestinal tract endoscopy and endoscopy findings of patients who underwent upper endoscopy in years 1990, 1995, 2000, and 2005 in our department were compared. RESULTS: Over the 15-year period, the number of diagnostic endoscopies performed in our department in years 1990, 1995, 2000, and 2005 increased (953, 1245, 2350, and 2528, respectively). Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding had become less frequent (40%, 42.8%, 19.7%, 14.3%, P<0.001), but dyspepsia (24.4%, 33.6%, 54.3%, 51.3%, P=0.002) and reflux (1.8%, 1.3%, 5.1%, 10.8%, P=0.005) more frequent indications for upper endoscopy. The endoscopic findings of duodenal ulcer (39.1%, 22.5%, 20.5%, 9.3%, P<0.001), gastric ulcer (15.9%, 8.3%, 5.7%, 4.6%, P=0.036) as well as erosive gastroduodenitis (35.6%, 22.2%, 15.3%, 4.7%, P<0.001) decreased, whereas that of reflux esophagitis (3.1%, 10.1%, 12%, 16%, P=0.034) increased. Moreover, the percentage of patients with negative endoscopy or minimal endoscopic findings (eg, nonerosive gastritis) increased (12.8%, 33.7%, 54.1%, 64.4%, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In south-western Greece, dyspepsia and reflux as an indication for upper endoscopy have been increasing, whereas acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding has been decreasing. The finding of peptic ulcers at the upper gastrointestinal tract endoscopy has become significantly less frequent, while the percentage of patients with negative results of endoscopy seems to have been increasing rapidly.     

Systematic Endoscopic Approach for Diagnosing Gastric Subepithelial Tumors

Subepithelial tumors (SETs) are commonly encountered during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, especially during national gastric cancer screening programs in Korea. Although the majority of SETs are benign, endoscopists harbor concerns regarding whether a SET is benign or malignant because the diagnosis cannot be established on the basis of routine endoscopic biopsy findings. The differential diagnosis of SETs is important, beginning with meticulous endoscopic examination, including the evaluation of the location, macroscopic shape, color, surface characteristics, mobility, consistency, and size of the tumors. The yield of endoscopic biopsy increases with the use of the bite-on-bite technique for SETs without the rolling or tenting sign, with large openings, and with erosion or ulceration. In this review, a systematic approach for the diagnosis of gastric SETs during conventional endoscopy is introduced.     

Is upper gastrointestinal endoscopy indicated in asymptomatic patients with a positive fecal occult blood test and negative colonoscopy?

PURPOSE: There are no recommendations as to whether endoscopic evaluation of the upper gastrointestinal tract is indicated in asymptomatic patients who have a positive fecal occult blood test and a negative colonoscopy. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: All asymptomatic patients with a positive fecal occult blood test who were referred for diagnostic endoscopy were identified. Patient charts, endoscopy records, and pathology reports were reviewed. RESULTS: During the 5-year study period, 498 asymptomatic patients with a positive fecal occult blood test and negative colonoscopy were evaluated. An upper gastrointestinal source of occult bleeding was detected in 67 patients (13%), with peptic ulcer disease being the most common lesion identified (8%). Four patients were diagnosed with gastric cancer and 1 had esophageal carcinoma. In addition, 74 patients (15%) had lesions that were not considered a source of occult bleeding; these findings prompted a change in management in 56 patients (11%). Anemia was the only variable significantly associated with having a clinically important lesion identified (multivariate odds ratio = 5.0; 95% confidence interval 2.9 to 8.5; P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy yields important findings in asymptomatic patients with a positive fecal occult blood test and negative colonoscopy. Our data suggest that endoscopic evaluation of the upper gastrointestinal tract should be considered, especially in patients with anemia.     

Terminology and its application to computer-aided data processing in digestive endoscopy

Endoscopic word database systems are not standardized. An endoscopic word reference has been developed by the World Organization for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. The suggestion is made to develop a standard software program for gastrointestinal endoscopy based on this system or one similar.     

Disinfection of gastrointestinal endoscopes and accessories

Abstract A worldwide concern has emerged with regard to endoscope disinfection and many gastrointestinal endoscopy associations have developed guidelines for proper disinfection of endoscopes and endoscopic accessories. A working party was convened to formulate guidelines for the Asia–Pacific region, pertaining to any setting in which gastrointestinal endoscopy is performed. Endoscope reprocessing that meets the established standard of practice helps to ensure a microbial-free endoscope for all patients, reduces the risk of disease transmission and helps to prolong the life of the endoscope. The recommendations included mechanical cleaning as the first and most important step followed by immersion in 2% glutaraldehyde for a minimum period of 10 min. Automated disinfectors have been recommended for busy endoscopy centres to ensure better compliance. Reuse of endoscopic accessories meant for 'single use' remains a controversial issue. Strict quality assurance programmes are a must to preclude lack of compliance with these guidelines.     

Endoscopic scoring of late gastrointestinal mucosal damage after adjuvant radiochemotherapy

AIM: To evaluate late effects of chemoradiation on gastrointestinal mucosa with an endoscopic scoring system and compare it to a clinical scoring system. METHODS: Twenty-four patients going to receive chemoradiation after gastric surgery underwent endoscopy four wk after surgery and one year after the chemoradiation finished. Upper gastrointestinal findings were recorded according to a system proposed by World Organisation for Digestive Endoscopy (OMED) and clinical scoring was done with RTOG-EORTC radiation morbidity scoring systems. RESULTS: There was no significant endoscopic difference in gastric and intestinal mucosa after chemoradiation (P > 0.05) and there was no association between endoscopic scores and clinical scores. Endoscopic changes were minimal. CONCLUSION: Late effects after chemoradiation in operated patients with gastric cancers can be evaluated with an endoscopic scoring system objectively and this system is superior to clinical scoring systems.     

Age and alarm symptoms do not predict endoscopic findings among patients with dyspepsia: a multicentre database study

INTRODUCTION: Symptoms of dyspepsia are common but most patients do not have major upper gastrointestinal pathology. Endoscopy is recommended for dyspeptic patients over the age of 45, or those with certain "alarm" symptoms. We have evaluated the effectiveness of age and "alarm" symptoms for predicting major endoscopic findings in six practising endoscopy centres. METHODS: Clinical variables of consecutive patients with dyspepsia symptoms undergoing upper endoscopy examinations were recorded using a common endoscopy database. Patients who had no previous upper endoscopy or barium radiography were included. Stepwise multivariate logistic regression was used to identify predictors of endoscopic findings. The accuracy of these for predicting endoscopic findings was evaluated with receiver operating characteristic analysis. The sensitivity and specificity of age thresholds from 30 to 70 years were evaluated. RESULTS: Major pathology (tumour, ulcer, or stricture) was found at endoscopy in 787/3815 (21%) patients with dyspepsia. Age, male sex, bleeding, and anaemia were found to be significant but weak independent predictors of endoscopic findings. A multivariate prediction rule based on these factors had poor predictive accuracy (c statistic=0.62). Using a simplified prediction rule of age > or =45 years or the presence of any "alarm" symptom, sensitivity was 87% and specificity was 26%. Increasing or decreasing the age cut off did not significantly improve the predictive accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: Age and the presence of "alarm" symptoms are not effective predictors of endoscopic findings among patients with dyspepsia. Better clinical prediction strategies are needed to identify patients with significant upper gastrointestinal pathology.