Donor biopsy and kidney transplant outcomes: an analysis using the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing (OPTN/UNOS) database

BACKGROUND: Although the degree of glomerulosclerosis on pretransplant donor biopsy is one criterion used in the decision to accept a deceased donor kidney, its relationship with graft survival remains controversial. This study compared graft survival with the degree of glomerulosclerosis found on donor biopsy. We also examined the agreement in degree of glomerulosclerosis between paired kidneys. METHODS: Biopsy results from 12,129 adult deceased donor transplants between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2005 were identified in the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing data, as of September 11, 2006. Of these, 2696 donors had both kidneys biopsied and subsequently transplanted. RESULTS: Among the groups with greater than 5% glomerulosclerosis, there was no statistically significant difference in graft survival rates (log-rank, P=0.44). The overall graft survival rates of the 0-5% group were significantly superior to those of the >5% groups (1-, 3-, and 5-year rates: 85.9%, 72.4%, and 59.0% for 0-5% group vs. 81.6%, 68.1%, and 53.6% for >5% group, log-rank P<0.001). Agreement between paired kidneys from the same donor was highest for the 0-5% glomerulosclerosis groups (90.6% for pairs with 0-5% glomerulosclerosis in the left kidney vs. 42.5% for pairs with >5% glomerulosclerosis in the left kidney). CONCLUSION: Donor kidneys with less than 6% glomerulosclerosis were associated with better graft outcomes and intrapair agreement in the degree of glomerulosclerosis. Among kidneys with greater than 5% glomerulosclerosis, the degree of glomerulosclerosis did not help predict graft outcomes. Sampling error may contribute to the lack of outcome differences seen among these kidneys, given the low intrapair agreement.     

En-Bloc Kidney Transplantation in the United States: An Analysis of United Network of Organ Sharing (UNOS) Data from 1987 to 2003

With increasing donor organ shortages, en-bloc kidney (EBK) transplantation is an alternative to utilize very young or very old donor age cadaver kidneys for transplantation. Several single-center series have reported excellent graft survival (GS). We sought to determine national level registry-based patterns for GS and determine adjusted hazard ratios (AHR) for graft loss after EBK versus single kidney (SK) cadaver transplants.
Data reported to UNOS from 1987 to 2003 were analyzed using PHREG (SAS version 8.1) statistical procedures. Proportional hazards models were constructed that included multiple donor, recipient and surgical variables.
Of the 2160 EBK transplants reported, 77% were from donors < 5 years of age. EBK transplants had superior GS to SK transplants, when donor age was restricted to < 5 years (AHR 0.708, p < 0.001). GS at 1, 3 and 5 years post-transplant was superior with EBK (85%, 76% and 71%) versus SK (81%, 68%, 63% and p < 0.001 at all time points). EBK transplants from very young donors were associated with a significantly lower rate of delayed graft function than SK transplants (17.9% versus 23.4%, p < 0.001).
National registry data suggest that EBK transplants present a viable option for transplantation of very young donor kidneys.     

High Rate of Unemployment After Kidney Transplantation: Analysis of the United Network for Organ Sharing Database

Introduction

Despite an increased quality of life after transplant, in the United States, recipients participate less in employment compared to the general population. Employment after kidney transplantation is an important marker of clinically significant individual health recovery. Furthermore, it has been shown that employment status in the post-transplant period has a strong and independent association with patient and graft survival.

Materials and Methods

Using the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database, we identified all adults (between 18 and 64 years of age) who underwent kidney transplantation between 2004 and 2011. Patients with a stable renal allograft function and with full 1-, 3-, and 5-year follow-up were included. For recipients of multiple transplants, the most recent transplant was considered the target transplant. The data collected included employment rate after kidney transplantation in recipients employed and unemployed before transplant. The employment data were stratified for insurance payer (private, Medicaid, and Medicare). The results of categorical variables are reported as percentages. Comparisons between groups for categorical data were performed using the χ² test with Yates continuity correction or Fisher test when appropriate.

Results

The UNOS database available for this study included a total of 100,521 patients. The employment rate at the time of transplant was 23.1% (n = 23,225) under private insurance and 10% (n = 10,032) under public insurance (Medicaid and Medicare, P < .01, compared to private insurance). Over a total of 29,809 recipients analyzed, alive and with stable renal allograft function who were working at time of transplantation, the employment rate was 47% (n = 14,010), 44% (n = 13,115), and 43% (n = 12,817) at 1, 3, and 5 years after transplant under private insurance and 16% (n = 4769), 14% (n = 4173), and 12% (n = 3567), respectively, under public insurance (P < .01, compared to private insurance). Over a total of 46,363 recipients alive and with stable renal function who were not working at time of transplant, the employment rate was 5.3% (n = 2457), 5.6% (n = 2596), and 6.2% (n = 2874) at 1, 3, and 5 years after transplant under private insurance and 6.5% (n = 3013), 7.8% (n = 3616), and 7.5% (n = 3477), respectively, under public insurance (P < .01, compared to private insurance).

Conclusion

The employment rates at the time of transplant in the United States are generally low, although privately insured patients are significantly more likely than patient with public insurance to have employment. Only a portion of these patients returns to work after transplantation. For the patients unemployed at the time of transplantation, the chance to find a job afterward is quite low even in privately insured patients. A concerted effort should be made by the transplant community to improve the ability of successful kidney transplant recipients to return to work or find a new employment. It had been shown that employment status in the post-transplant period has a strong and independent association with the graft and recipient survival.     

Direction of the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network and United Network for Organ Sharing Regarding the Oversight of Live Donor Transplantation and Solicitation for Organs

The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) operated by United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) has taken recent steps to address public solicitation for organ donors and its oversight of live donor transplantation. This report provides the direction of the OPTN regarding deceased donor solicitation. The OPTN has authority under federal law to equitably allocate deceased donor organs within a single national network based upon medical criteria, not upon one's social or economic ability to utilize resources not available to all on the waiting list. The OPTN makes a distinction between solicitations for a live donor organ versus solicitations for directed donation of deceased organs. As to live donor solicitation, the OPTN cannot regulate or restrict ways relationships are developed in our society, nor does it seek to do so. OPTN members have a responsibility of helping protect potential recipients from hazards that can arise from public appeals for live donor organs. Oversight and support of the OPTN for live donor transplantation is now detailed by improving the reporting of live donor follow-up, by providing a mechanism for facilitating anonymous live kidney donation, and by providing information for potential live kidney donors via the UNOS Transplant Living website.     

Heart Transplantation With and Without Prior Sternotomy: Analysis of the United Network for Organ Sharing Database

Introduction

Patients with history of prior sternotomy may have poorer outcomes after heart transplantation. Quantitation of risk from prior sternotomy has not been well established. The United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database was analyzed to assess early and late survival and predictors of outcome in adult heart transplant recipients with and without prior sternotomy.

Methods

Of 11,266 adults with first heart–only transplantation from 1997 to 2011, recipients were divided into 2 groups: those without prior sternotomy (first sternotomy group; n = 6006 or 53.3%) and those with at least 1 prior sternotomy (redo sternotomy group; n = 5260 or 46.7%). A multivariable Cox model was used to identify predictors of mortality.

Results

Survival was lower in the redo group at 60 days (92.6% vs 95.9%; hazard ratio [HR] 1.83, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.56–2.15; P < .001). Conditional 5-year survival in 60-day survivors was similar in the 2 groups (HR = 1.01, 95% CI 0.90–1.12, P = .90). During the first 60 days post-transplant, the redo group had more cardiac reoperations (12.3% vs 8.8%, P = .0008), a higher frequency of dialysis (8.9% vs 5.2%, P < .0001), a greater percentage of drug-treated infections (23.2% vs 19%, P = .003), and a higher percentage of strokes (2.5% vs 1.4%, P = .0001). A multivariable Cox proportional hazards model identified prior sternotomy as a significant independent predictor of mortality, in addition to age, female gender, congenital cardiomyopathy, need for ventilation, mechanical circulatory support, dialysis prior to transplant, pretransplant serum bilirubin (≥3 mg/dL), and preoperative serum creatinine (≥2 mg/dL).

Conclusions

Prior sternotomy is associated with an excess 3.3% mortality and higher morbidity within the first 60 days after heart transplantation, as measured by frequency of dialysis, drug-treated infections, and strokes. Conditional 5-year survival after 60 days is unaffected by prior sternotomy. These findings should be taken into account for risk assessment of patients undergoing heart transplantation.     

Liver transplantation for childhood hepatic malignancy: a review of the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database

Background

Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is the only treatment option for unresectable hepatoblastoma (HB) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in children. Aggregated outcomes of OLT for these hepatic malignancies have not been evaluated in the United Network for Organ Sharing national database.

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to evaluate graft and patient survival in pediatric OLT recipients with HB and HCC.

Methods

Data from the United Network for Organ Sharing Standard Transplant and Research Files were analyzed and included pediatric (<18 years) OLT recipients with HB or HCC from 1987 to 2004. The effects of diagnosis on pretransplant variables were evaluated using analysis of variance methods or χ² tests, as appropriate. Actuarial survival and effect of diagnosis on survival were determined using Kaplan-Meier methods and log-rank tests.

Results

Since 1987, 152 OLTs have been performed in 135 pediatric patients for HB and 43 OLTs in 41 pediatric patients for HCC. Respective 1-, 5-, and 10-year patient survival after OLT was 79%, 69%, and 66% for HB and 86%, 63%, and 58% for HCC (P = .73). The primary cause of death for both groups was metastatic or recurrent disease, accounting for 54% of deaths in the HB group and 86% in the HCC group (P = .338). Patients with hepatoblastoma were younger (mean age, 2.9 ± 2.5 vs 10.4 ± 4.8 years for the HCC group; P < .001) and more likely to receive a living donor organ (16% vs 4%, P = .03). A greater proportion of the patients with HB had previous abdominal surgery than patients with HCC (63% HB vs 37% HCC, P = .04). Pretransplant medical condition and transplant era were associated with graft and patient survival on univariate and multivariate analysis (all P < .05).

Conclusions

Orthotopic liver transplantation remains a viable option for pediatric patients with unresectable primary hepatic malignancies and results in good long-term survival. Pretransplant medical condition is an important predictor of outcome. Thus, in conjunction with better chemotherapy regimens, earlier evaluation for OLT in patients with unresectable HB and HCC may result in yet further improved long-term survival.     

Kidney Transplantation in Children and Adolescents: An Analysis of United Network for Organ Sharing Database

Specific pediatric allocation schemes can not only lead to minimization of waiting time, but also to better clinical outcomes for children with end-stage renal disease. The outcome of 4125 deceased donor kidney transplants (DDKT) aged 5-35 years were compared with those of 6456 living donor kidney transplants (LDKT) using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. Unadjusted graft survival rates of DDKT were significantly lower than those of LDKT (hazards ratio [HR] = 1.53; P < .001). Chronic rejection was reported in 416 (10.1%) of 4125 in the DDKT group compared with 537 (8.3%) of 6456 in the LDKT group (P < .001). Among African American recipients, 67 (3.4%) grafts were lost due to noncompliance as a contributory cause of failure compared with 126 (1.5%) among other races (P < .001). A significantly lower incidence of noncompliance was observed in children (0.9%) compared with adolescents (2.2% in ages 10-14; P < .001) and high teens (2.0% in ages 15-20; P < .001). Multivariate analysis showed that adjusted graft survival rates of LDKT were superior to DDKT (HR = 1.22; P < .001) after adjusting for recipient race, recipient age, regraft status, and HLA mismatch. The differences of long-term graft survival rates between DDKT and LDKT have not been reduced (4% at 1 year, 10% at 3 years, and 12% at 5 years for unadjusted survival rates and 3% at 1 year, 6% at 3 years, and 9% at 5 years adjusted survival rates). In our analysis presented here the difference in graft survival between LDKT and DDKT has doubled compared with earlier analysis. Therefore, we recommend LDKT whenever possible as a first choice for pediatric transplant recipients.     

Impact of Donor Cause of Death on Transplant Outcomes: UNOS Registry Analysis

Donor cause of death (DCOD) has been described to influence allograft survival. Whether this effect is independent of other donor characteristics and whether it is similar across different solid organ allografts is not known. The aim of our study was to determine the impact of DCOD on organ utilization and on transplantation outcomes—graft rejection, function, and survival. The registry data were provided by the United Network for Organ Sharing/Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network. Stroke, head trauma, and anoxia were the cause of brain death in 97% of the more than 86,000 donors whose data were recorded between 1989 and 2008. In univariate analysis, stroke DCOD was associated with worse graft survival across all organs. After adjustment in a multivariable analysis, modest differences persisted in survival of heart, kidney, and liver allografts. DCOD also appeared to affect the incidence of allograft rejection. Anoxia DCOD was associated with significantly less rejection relative to donor death caused by head trauma and stroke. In summary, this multi-institutional study confirms that DCOD is a modest predictor of survival and rejection of solid organ allografts of different types.     

The results of cardiac retransplantation: an analysis of the Joint International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation/United Network for Organ Sharing Thoracic Registry

BACKGROUND: It is well established that repeat heart transplantation has a significantly worse outcome when compared with primary (first time) transplantation. Defining the risk factors for mortality within this group has been difficult due to small numbers of patients at individual centers. METHODS: All cardiac retransplants performed in the United States and registered in the Joint International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT)/United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) Thoracic Registry were analyzed for demographics, morbidity posttransplantation, immunosuppression, and risk factors for mortality. RESULTS: The study cohort included 514 patients of which 81% were male with a mean age of 47+/-12 years. Time from primary transplant to retransplantation ranged from 1 day to 15.5 years and more than 50% of the patients underwent retransplantation for chronic rejection. More than 60% of patients were in the intensive care unit at the time of retransplantation and more than 40% of the patients were reported to be on some form of life support (ventricular assist device, ventilator, and/or inotropic therapy). Survival for the entire retransplant cohort was 65, 59, and 55% for 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively, but was substantially lower when the intertransplant interval was short. Conversely, when the interval between primary and retransplantation was more than 2 years, 1 year survival postretransplantation approached that of primary transplantation. Additional independent risk factors for mortality for the retransplant cohort included overall cardiac transplant center volume, the use of a ventricular assist device or ventilator, the patient being in the intensive care unit, and recipient age. The four most common causes of death were infection, primary/nonspecific graft failure, chronic rejection (allograft vasculopathy), and acute rejection. CONCLUSIONS: The data confirm that repeat heart transplantation is a higher risk procedure than primary transplantation, especially early after the primary heart transplant.     

Results of pancreas transplantation in the United States for 1987-90 from the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) Registry with comparison to 1984-87 results

An outcome analysis was performed on pancreas transplants in the United States reported to the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) Registry from its inception on 1 October 1987 to 21 October 1990 (n=1021). These cases comprise nearly one-third of the 3082 pancreas transplants reported to the International Pancreas Transplant Registry (1819 U.S., 1263 non-U.S.) from 1 December 1966 to 31 December 1990, including 619 in 1990 (528 U.S., 91 non-U.S.). Nearly all pancreas transplants in the U.S. during the 1987-90 period were by the bladder-drainage (BD) technique (92%). The overall patient and pancreas graft actuarial survival rates were 92% and 72% at 1 year. Patient survival rates were similar in all recipient categories, but pancreas graft survival rates were significantly higher (p less than 0.001) in recipients of a simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK) transplant (n=883) than in recipients of a pancreas after a kidney (PAK, n=112) or a pancreas transplant alone (PTA, n=71), being 77%, 52%, and 54%, respectively, at 1 yr. Kidney graft survival at 1 yr in U.S. SPK recipients was 86%. Most grafts (81%) were preserved in University of Wisconsin (UW) solution, and more than half were stored greater than 12 hours, with no difference in outcome with increasing duration of storage. At 1 yr, functional survival rates were 72% for U.S. pancreas grafts stored for either less than 12 (n=439), 12-24 (n=422), or 24-30 h (n=42). For grafts stored greater than 30 h (n=8), the 1-yr functional survival rate was 50% (p=ns versus the other storage times). On univariate analysis, no effect of HLA antigen mismatching on outcome for 1987-90 U.S. cases could be discerned. The results in the UNOS Registry were compared to the results for U.S. cases in the International Pancreas Transplant Registry performed between 1 January 1984 and 30 September 1987. In all recipient categories the pancreas graft functional survival rates were significantly higher in the 1987-90 (UNOS) than in the 1984-87 (pre-UNOS) era. A Cox multivariate analysis of 1984-90 cases showed the relative risk for pancreas graft loss to be significantly less (p less than 0.05) with bladder-drainage, with simultaneous transplantation of the kidney, with use of UW solution for preservation, and with 0-1 HLA-A, B, DR or 0 HLA-DR mismatches.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)