Hepatitis E virus infection in the liver transplant recipients:Clinical presentation and management

Hepatitis E virus(HEV) is an emerging pathogen and an increasingly recognized cause of graft hepatitis, especially in the post-orthotopic liver transplantation immunocompromised population. The exact incidence and prevalence of HEV infection in this population remains unclear but is certainly greater than historical estimates. Identifying acute HEV infection in this population is imperative for choosing the right course of management as it is very difficult to distinguish histologically from acute rejection on liver biopsy. Current suggested approach to manage acute HEV involves modifying immunosuppression, especially discontinuing calcineurin inhibitors which are the preferred immunosuppressive agents post-orthotopic liver transplantation. The addition of ribavirin monotherapy has shown promising success rates in clearing HEV infection and is used commonly in reported cases.     

Variability of hepatitis E serologic assays in a pediatric liver transplant recipient: challenges to diagnosing hepatitis E virus infection in the United States

Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is an emerging cause of viral hepatitis among immunocompromised individuals in developed countries. Yet the diagnosis of HEV infection in the United States remains challenging, because of the variable sensitivity and specificity of currently available tests, and the lack of a US Food and Drug Administration‐approved test. We report a case of multiple discordant HEV serology results in a pediatric liver transplant recipient with idiopathic hepatitis, and review the challenges to diagnosis of HEV infection in the United States.     

Hepatitis E infection is an under recognized cause of acute decompensation in patients with chronic liver disease

Background/aims

We aimed to assess characteristics of patients with a positive hepatitis E virus serology with emphasis on acute on chronic liver disease.

Methods

This was a retrospective audit performed at a large teaching hospital.

Results

Of the 164 patients tested, 15(9.1%) had a positive serology (hepatitis E virus IgG and or IgM) of whom two also had a positive hepatitis E virus RNA. Six (42.8%) had underlying chronic liver disease and presented with deteriorating liver tests ± decompensation. In one patient (16%) acute hepatitis E virus infection was the aetiology for the decompensation and in three the positive hepatitis E virus IgG was a reflection of prior subclinical infection. However, in two of the six patients with unexplained decompensation there was delay (150–270 days) in obtaining a hepatitis E virus serology, which may have resulted in a negative hepatitis E virus IgM at time of testing.

Conclusions

9.1% of patients presenting with abnormal liver tests at a large teaching hospital in south east England have a positive hepatitis E virus serology of whom 42.8% have acute on chronic liver disease. In 16% hepatitis E virus infection is the aetiology for the acute decompensation. This may be an under representation as in >30% of patients with unexplained decompensation there is considerable delay in requesting a hepatitis E virus serology.     

Hepatitis E in immunocompromised individuals

Hepatitis E virus (HEV) originally identified as a cause of acute icteric hepatitis in developing countries has grown to be a cause of zoonotic viral hepatitis in developed countries such as the United States. While there are eight identified genotypes to date, genotype 1 (HEV1), HEV2, HEV3, HEV4 are the most common to infect humans. HEV1 and HEV2 are most common in developing countries including Latina America, Africa and Asia, and are commonly transmitted through contaminated water supplies leading to regional outbreaks. In contrast HEV3 and HEV4 circulate freely in many mammalian animals and can lead to occasional transmission to humans through fecal contamination or consumption of undercooked meat. The incidence and prevalence of HEV in the United States is undetermined given the absence of FDA approved serological assays and the lack of commercially available testing. In majority of cases, HEV infection is a self-limiting hepatitis requiring only symptomatic treatment. However, this is not the case in immunocompromised individuals, including those that have undergone solid organ or stem cell transplantation. In this subset of patients, chronic infection can be life threatening as hepatic insult can lead to inflammation and fibrosis with subsequent cirrhosis and death. The need for re-transplantation as a result of post-transplant hepatitis is of great concern. In addition, there have been many reported incidents of extrahepatic manifestations, for which the exact mechanisms remain to be elucidated. The cornerstone of treatment in immunocompromised solid organ transplant recipients is reduction of immunosuppressive therapies, while attempting to minimize the risk of organ rejection. Subsequent treatment options include ribavirin, and pegylated interferon alpha in those who have demonstrated ribavirin resistance. Further investigation assessing safety and efficacy of anti-viral therapy is imperative given the rising global health burden. Given this concern, vaccination has been approved in China with other investigations underway throughout the world. In this review we introduce the epidemiology, diagnosis, clinical manifestations, and treatment of HEV, with emphasis on immunocompromised individuals in the United States.     

Hepatitis E infection in HIV‐infected liver and kidney transplant candidates

Hepatitis E virus (HEV) has been reported to cause acute and chronic hepatitis in those with HIV infection and among solid organ transplant recipients in Europe. Limited data indicate that HEV is endemic in the United States, but the prevalence and significance of HEV infection among those with HIV and awaiting solid organ transplantation is unknown. We evaluated anti‐HEV IgM and IgG antibodies and HEV RNA in 166 HIV‐infected solid organ transplant candidates enrolled in the NIH HIV‐Transplant Cohort. Overall prevalence of anti‐HEV IgG approached 20% in both liver and renal transplant candidates. Evidence of recent infection was present in approximately 2% of liver transplant candidates and none of the kidney transplant candidates. HEV RNA was not detected in any patient. We conclude that markers of HEV infection are frequent among candidates for transplantation, but active, ongoing viremia is not seen. Evidence of recent infection (acute on chronic) liver disease was present in liver but not kidney recipients.     

Hepatitis E virus infection after haploidentical haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: incidence and clinical course

Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is increasingly found to cause hepatitis in allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) patients. However, little is known about HEV infection in patients receiving haploidentical HSCT (haplo-HSCT). Here, we retrospectively evaluate the incidence and clinical course of HEV infection in haplo-HSCT patients. From January 2014 to July 2017, 177 patients with unexplained elevated transaminases after receiving haplo-HSCT at Peking University Institute of Haematology were screened for HEV using HEV serology. HEV RNA was assessed in blood samples when HEV-IgG and/or IgM antibodies were positive. Acute HEV infection was identified in 7 patients (3·9%), 1 of whom had developed a chronic HEV infection. The median time from haplo-HSCT to HEV infection was 17·5 (range, 6–55) months. HEV infection was confirmed by the presentation of anti-HEV IgM + anti-HEV IgG (rising) (n = 5) or HEV-RNA + anti-HEV IgM + anti-HEV IgG (n = 2). None of the patients died of HEV infection directly: 2 patients with HEV infection died showing signs of ongoing hepatitis, and 5 patients cleared HEV with a median duration of HEV infection of 1·5 (range, 1·0–5·7) months. In conclusion, HEV infection is a rare but serious complication after haplo-HSCT. We recommend screening of HEV in haplo-HSCT.     

Hepatitis C and liver transplantation

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is important to the liver transplant recipient for several reasons. First, chronic HCV infection is a frequent cause of end-stage liver disease in North America and Europe, where the majority of liver transplants are performed. Second, recurrence of HCV after liver transplantation is almost universal so that many liver transplant recipients with and without overt hepatitis are viraemic. Third, HCV infection in the organ donor and/or in the blood transfused in the peri-transplant period make acquisition of HCV possible. Finally, liver transplantation for chronic HCV infection represents a major financial burden to the health-care system in the USA and worldwide. Histological hepatitis not due to HBV or cytomegalovirus (CMV) is present in 14–35% of allografts from patients undergoing liver transplantation, and the majority of this is due to HCV infection. HCV infection recurs post-transplant in almost all patients with pre-transplant infection. Proof that HCV does recur has been provided by the sequencing of the hypervariable domain of the E2/NS1 region. The magnitude of HCV infection is underestimated by using serological assays in this immunosuppressed population. Using the b-DNA assay, HCV-RNA levels have been shown to increase in patients with recurrent infection. The long-term consequences remain to be defined but post-transplantation HCV infection is generally much less devastating than post-transplantation HBV infection, and many patients have clinically silent disease. It is likely that a carrier state exists in immunosuppressed transplant recipients since high HCV-RNA levels occur in the absence of liver damage. In one study, 1, 2 and 3 year patient survival rates were shown to be comparable in patients with chronic active HCV infection and with cryptogenic cirrhosis (94, 89 and 87%, and 84, 84 and 73%, respectively). A more recent study from the University of Pittsburgh which compared the outcome of a larger number of HCV-infected patients (n= 237) with a large number of control patients with non-viral disease (n= 801), showed that indeed HCV infection does impact negatively on both patient and graft survival (1, 2 and 3 year patient survival in the study and control groups of 78, 68 and 66% and 84, 82 and 78%, respectively, P= 0.001). Undoubtedly with time, the full impact of recurrent HCV infection will become apparent, although short-term survival is sufficiently good to warrant continued transplantation of this group of patients. While the disease course in many patients is benign, aggressive post-transplant HCV infection leading to liver failure is well documented. Factors which determine why some patients are more susceptible to liver damage than others are currently under study. It is likely that many interrelated variables are involved, including the level of pre-transplant viraemia, genotype of the virus, amount of post-transplantation immunosuppression, and ability of the host immune system to recognize HCV and mount an immune response.     

Hepatitis E in solid organ transplant recipients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUNDHepatitis E virus (HEV) infection is underdiagnosed due to the use of serological assays with low sensitivity. Although most patients with HEV recover completely, HEV infection among patients with pre-existing chronic liver disease and organ-transplant recipients on immunosuppressive therapy can result in decompensated liver disease and death.AIMTo demonstrate the prevalence of HEV infection in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. METHODSWe searched Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library for eligible articles through October 2020. The inclusion criteria consisted of adult patients with history of SOT. HEV infection is confirmed by either HEV-immunoglobulin G, HEV-immunoglobulin M, or HEV RNA assay.RESULTSOf 563 citations, a total of 22 studies (n = 4557) were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled estimated prevalence of HEV infection in SOT patients was 20.2% [95% confidence interval (CI): 14.9-26.8]. The pooled estimated prevalence of HEV infection for each organ transplant was as follows: liver (27.2%; 95%CI: 20.0-35.8), kidney (12.8%; 95%CI: 9.3-17.3), heart (12.8%; 95%CI: 9.3-17.3), and lung (5.6%; 95%CI: 1.6-17.9). Comparison across organ transplants demonstrated statistical significance (Q = 16.721, P = 0.002). The subgroup analyses showed that the prevalence of HEV infection among SOT recipients was significantly higher in middle-income countries compared to high-income countries. The pooled estimated prevalence of de novo HEV infection was 5.1% (95%CI: 2.6-9.6) and the pooled estimated prevalence of acute HEV infection was 4.3% (95%CI: 1.9-9.4).CONCLUSIONHEV infection is common in SOT recipients, particularly in middle-income countries. The prevalence of HEV infection in lung transplant recipients is considerably less common than other organ transplants. More studies examining the clinical impacts of HEV infection in SOT recipients, such as graft failure, rejection, and mortality are warranted.     

Hepatitis E virus genotype 3 is associated with gallstone-related disease

Abstract

Objective: Hepatitis E virus (HEV) genotype 3 is endemic in Northern Europe and despite a high seroprevalence of anti-HEV IgG antibodies among blood donors (≈17%), few clinical cases are notified in Sweden. Low awareness of hepatitis E and its possible symptoms may contribute to this discrepancy. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of acute HEV infection among hospital admitted patients with abdominal pain and elevated liver enzymes.

Materials and methods: During 2016–2017, 148 adult patients with serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) > twice normal levels were prospectively enrolled at surgical wards at three Swedish hospitals. Serum samples were analyzed for HEV RNA as well as anti-HEV IgM and IgG, and medical records were reviewed.

Results: Six (6/148, 4.1%) patients were HEV infected confirmed by detectable HEV RNA, but only one of these patients had detectable anti-HEV antibodies. Four of the HEV infected patients were diagnosed with gallstone-related disease: three with biliary pancreatitis and one with biliary colic. The remaining two were diagnosed with bowel obstruction and pancreatic malignancy. Four HEV strains were typed by sequencing to genotype 3.

Conclusions: This study identified acute HEV3 infection in 4% of the patients with elevated liver enzymes admitted to a surgical ward. HEV infection was not the solitary disease leading to hospitalization, instead it was found to be associated with other surgical conditions such as gallstone-related disease including biliary pancreatitis. Additionally, HEV RNA might be the preferential diagnostic tool for detecting ongoing HEV infection.     

Hepatitis E virus:Epidemiology,diagnosis,clinical manifestations,and treatment

The hepatitis E virus(HEV) is the fifth known form of viral hepatitis and was first recognized as the cause of an epidemic of unexplained acute hepatitis in the early 1980 s. Globally, it is one of the most frequent causes of acute viral hepatitis. The majority of HEV infections are asymptomatic and lead to the spontaneous clearance of the virus. Among the eight different genotypes identified to date, HEV genotype 1(HEV1), HEV2, HEV3, and HEV4 are the most frequent genotypes causing infections in humans. HEV1 and HEV2 are prevalent in developing regions and able to result in large-scale outbreaks originating from contaminated water supplies. They are also responsible for severe hepatitis in pregnant patients and infants. In contrast, HEV3 and HEV4 are zoonotic, and the transmission of these genotypes to humans occurs mainly through the fecal contamination of water and consumption of contaminated meat from infected animals. Their main reservoir is the pig, and they are mostly encountered in developed countries. The major risk groups for HEV infection and its ensuing adverse consequences are pregnant women, infants, older people, immunocompromised individuals, patients with underlying chronic liver diseases, and workers that come into close contact with HEV-infected animals. In the clinical perspective, HEV infections have diverse clinical manifestations including acute and self-limiting hepatitis, acute-on-chronic liver disease, chronic hepatitis, cirrhosis, and liver failure. Although HEV mainly results in acute selflimiting infection, chronic HEV infection may occur among immunocompromised patients(e.g., solid-organ transplant recipients). Additionally, HEV-associated extrahepatic manifestations involving various organs have been reported in the last decade, although the causal link for many of them still needs to be proven. Ribavirin and interferon-alpha are the most widely used agents for the treatment of HEV infections with a certain level of success. However, ribavirin is contraindicated in pregnant patients, and interferon-alpha cannot be used in most transplant recipients. Therefore, there is an urgent need for novel antiviral compounds that are safe and effective particularly for patients having contraindications for ribavirin or interferon-alpha and infected by the ribavirinresistant HEV. In this review article, a literature search using PubMed and MEDLINE databases was performed, up to March 2020. Only the articles published in English were reviewed.     

Hepatitis C virus infection in the human immunodeficiency virus infected patient

Human immunodeficiency virus(HIV)and hepatitis C virus(HCV)share the same transmission routes;therefore,coinfection is frequent.An estimated 5-10 million individuals alone in the western world are infected with both viruses.The majority of people acquire HCV by injection drug use and,to a lesser extent,through blood transfusion and blood products.Recently,there has been an increase in HCV infections among men who have sex with men.In the context of effective antiretroviral treatment,liver-related deaths are now more common than Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromerelated deaths among HIV-HCV coinfected individuals.Morbidity and mortality rates from chronic HCV infection will increase because the infection incidence peaked in the mid-1980s and because liver disease progresses slowly and is clinically silent to cirrhosis and end-stage-liver disease over a 15-20 year time period for 15%-20%of chronically infected individuals.HCV treatment has rapidly changed with the development of new direct-acting antiviral agents;therefore,cure rates have greatly improved because the new treatment regimens target different parts of the HCV life cycle.In this review,we focus on the epidemiology,diagnosis and the natural course of HCV as well as current and future strategies for HCV therapy in the context of HIV-HCV coinfection in the western world.     

Listeria monocytogenes-associated acute hepatitis in a liver transplant recipient

ABSTRACT— We report a case of Listeria monocytogenes bacteriemia with liver involvement mimicking acute viral hepatitis in a liver transplant recipient. The patient presented with fever, jaundice and alanine aminotransferase levels ten times the upper limit of normal. Liver biopsy showed signs of acute hepatitis and occasional granulomas. Both blood and liver biopsy cultures were positive for Listeria monocytogenes. The patient received a 3 week course of ampicillin and gentamicin with clinical and biochemical recovery. Liver involvement during Listeria infections is unusual, and most cases occur in patients with underlying hepatic disease and impaired cell-mediated immunity. To our knowledge only one such case has previously been reported in a liver transplant patient. Furthermore, in the present case we isolated the causal agent from the liver biopsy specimen.     

Acute hepatitis E virus infection causing acute liver failure requiring living‐donor liver transplantation in a non‐pregnant immunocompetent woman

We report a rare case of acute liver failure from acute hepatitis E virus (HEV) in a non‐pregnant woman without comorbidities who survived after liver transplantation. The source was likely consumption of partially cooked pig liver. HEV genotype 3 is the second most common genotype causing acute hepatitis E in developed countries. Fulminant hepatitis E rarely occurs without a risk factor, as in our patient. Vigilant monitoring for chronic hepatitis E in post‐transplant immunocompromised patients is needed.     

Different behaviour of BK-virus infection in liver transplant recipients

Polyomavirus BK(BKV) infects up to 90% of the general population. After primary infection, occurring early during childhood, a state of non-replicative infection is established in the reno-urinary tract, without complications for immunocompetent hosts. In immunocompromised individuals, particularly transplanted patients, asymptomatic BKV viremia and/or viruria can be observed. Renal grafts may also be sources of infection as BKV prefers kidneys rather than other solid organs for transplantation such as the liver. The mechanism behind the higher incidence of BKV infection in kidney transplant patients, compared to liver or heart transplantation, is unclear and the prevalence of BKV infection in non-renal solid organ transplants has not been yet thoroughly investigated. We evaluated the prevalence of Polyomavirus BK infection among liver transplant recipients. A Pub Med search was conducted using the terms BKV infection AND liver transplant recipients; BKV AND non-renal solid organ transplant*; BKV infection AND immunosuppression; the search was limited to title/abstract and English-language articles published from 2000, to March 2015. Eleven relevant studies suggest that the prevalence of BKV viruria and/or viremia among liver transplant recipients is less than that reported in kidney or heart transplant recipients, except when chronic kidney disease(CKD) is present at the same time. Data also suggest that viruric and viremic patients have higher levels of serum creatinine than BKV negative patients. Moreover, no specific immunosuppressive drugs are associated with the onset of BKV nephropathy. The comorbidity of transplantation and CKD could play a major role in promoting BKV replication.