Comparison of cardiopulmonary resuscitation techniques using video camera recordings.

OBJECTIVE--To use video recordings to compare the performance of resuscitation teams in relation to their previous training in cardiac resuscitation. METHODS--Over a 10 month period all cardiopulmonary resuscitations carried out in an accident and emergency (A&E) resuscitation room were videotaped. The following variables were monitored: (1) time to perform three defibrillatory shocks; (2) time to give intravenous adrenaline (centrally or peripherally); (3) the numbers and grade of medical and nursing staff involved in the resuscitation; (4) the experience and training of these personnel. RESULTS--Of 101 resuscitations recorded, 69 were carried out by the A&E team alone and 32 by the hospital cardiac arrest team. Resuscitation procedures were carried out significantly more rapidly by the former. Skills and protocols were most effectively used when the resuscitation team was led by an experienced doctor who had received specific training in cardiopulmonary resuscitation, that is, Advanced Life Support course (ALS) or Advanced Cardiac Life Support course (ACLS). Such an individual was always present at A&E team resuscitations but in only 6% of cardiac arrest team resuscitations. CONCLUSIONS--ALS course completion should be regarded as a vital part of the training of any doctor involved in cardiopulmonary resuscitation.     

Immediate Cardiac Life Support (ICLS) course developed by Japanese Association for Acute Medicine

The Immediate Cardiac Life Support (ICLS) course was developed and launched by Japanese Association for Acute Medicine (JAAM) for resident training, in April 2002. The ICLS course is designed as multi-professional one-day (8 hours) resuscitation course and teaches the essential skills and team dynamics required to manage a patient in cardiac arrest for 10 minutes before the arrival of a cardiovascular specialist. The course consists of skill stations and scenario stations. The skill stations provide basic life support (BLS) with automated external defibrillator (AED), basic airway management and in-hospital management with electrocardiographic (ECG) monitoring with manual external defibrillator. In total, 117,246 candidates attended 6,971 ICLS courses until the end of December 2010. Furthermore, we developed additional course of ICLS to manage stroke, Immediate Stroke Life Support (ISLS). We also describe the development and structure of, and rationale for the ICLS course.     

Simulated pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation: initial events and response times of a hospital arrest team

BACKGROUND: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training programs exist to enhance knowledge and skills retention. However, they do not ensure that effective CPR will be performed by trainees or resuscitation teams. One aspect of CPR effectiveness is the ability of the team to respond to an emergency call in a timely manner. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated the time required for team members to respond to an emergency call and to initiate definitive treatment in our pediatric facility. The medical staff who responded had no prior knowledge of the simulated cardiac arrest (SCA) events. All events were recorded on audio-cassette tape to determine the sequence of events and response time of arrest team members. SCA scenarios represented examples of cardiac, hematologic, renal, respiratory, and pharmacologic pathophysiology. All participants were instructed to respond as though the SCA were an actual emergency. RESULTS: From December 1991 to January 1993, 37 SCAs were evaluated. Documentation began after a concise arrest scenario had been presented to a designated nursing representative who was to be the first rescuer on the scene. The rescuer first assessed the patient's condition, activated the cardiac arrest system (median elapsed time, MET, 0.50 minutes), and then initiated single-person CPR (MET 0.58 minutes). Administration of oxygen occurred at an MET of 2.25 minutes. The first member of the arrest team to respond was the pediatric resident (MET 3.17 minutes) followed by the respiratory therapist (MET 3.20 minutes), an ICU nurse (MET 3.58 minutes), a pharmacist (MET 3.42 minutes), and anesthesiology personnel (MET 4.70 minutes). DISCUSSION: The use of SCAs (termed "Mega Code") serves as an extension of Basic Life Support and Advanced Cardiac Life Support education and provides a valuable learning experience and quality assurance tool. Limitations that might influence patient outcome during an actual in-hospital arrest have led to refinements in our cardiac arrest procedures. Of particular note was the delay in oxygen administration, which may be linked to its omission from the 1986 and 1992 American Heart Association Basic Life Support Guidelines. CONCLUSION: We believe that BLS education for hospital employees should include and emphasize oxygen delivery for resuscitation.     

The "Code Drugs in Cardiac Arrest"--the use of cardioactive medications in cardiac arrest resuscitation

In October of 2010, the American Heart Association (AHA) published the 2010 Guidelines on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. These guidelines place significant emphasis on 5 major areas of therapy in patient with cardiac arrest, including immediate recognition and activation of the emergency response team, effective chest compressions, rapid defibrillation, effective advanced life support (ALS), and integrated postresuscitation care. "Effective ALS" includes the placement of an advanced airway, establishment of parenteral access, and the administration of cardioactive medications. Advanced life support encompasses only 1 of these 5 major areas of cardiac arrest intervention-in sharp contrast to past renditions of the AHA guidelines in which ALS was significantly emphasized. In fact, recent research and the AHA guidelines note that ALS therapy is less important than previously thought. This article will briefly review the evidence regarding the use of the 5 principal medications--epinephrine, vasopressin, atropine, lidocaine, and amiodarone--used in Advanced Cardiac Life Support cardiac arrest algorithm.     

Developing leaders for advanced life support: evaluation of a training programme

AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness of a leadership development seminar introduced into the Resuscitation Council (UK) Advanced Life Support (ALS) Provider course. METHODS: Observational assessments of leadership performance during cardiac arrest scenarios before and after a leadership seminar. RESULTS: The leadership training programme significantly improved candidates leadership performance in the training situation. CONCLUSION: A formal leadership development programme should be introduced into advanced life support courses.     

Achieving house staff competence in emergency airway management: results of a teaching program using a computerized patient simulator

OBJECTIVES: Patient simulation is emerging as a training technique in the field of medicine. It has particular application in training responses to high-risk, low-frequency clinical events, of which a typical example is in-hospital cardiac arrest. A critical element of response by the cardiac arrest team is initial airway management. In teaching hospitals, medical interns are first responders to in-hospital cardiac arrests. Our objective was to design and test a program using a computer-controlled patient simulator to train medical interns and demonstrate their competence in initial airway management. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, controlled, unblinded trial. SETTING: Internal medicine residency training program in an urban teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: All 50 starting internal medicine interns in July 2002, all Advanced Cardiac Life Support certified in June 2002. INTERVENTIONS: All interns were tested in initial airway management skills and then were randomly assigned to receive either immediate or delayed individualized training using a computer-controlled patient simulator. The computer-simulated training process consisted of a scenario of respiratory arrest. The interns were challenged with the scenario twice following testing. The interns were debriefed extensively and given hands-on training by the attending using the simulator until they achieved perfect performance. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Initial airway management was divided into specific scorable steps. Individual step scores and total scores were recorded for each intern on initial and repeat testing. For 10 months following simulator training, intern airway management skills were scored in actual patient airway events. Despite recent Advanced Cardiac Life Support training and certification, all starting medical interns demonstrated poor airway management skills. The immediate training group showed significant improvement in initial airway management when tested before and 4 wks after training. In contrast, the delayed training group showed no significant improvement. Direct observation of interns in actual initial airway events revealed excellent clinical performance. CONCLUSIONS: Individualized training of medical interns using a computer-controlled patient simulator is an effective means of achieving and measuring competence in initial airway management skills. The improvement appears to be transferable to the bedside of real patients.     

The effect of pre-course e-learning prior to advanced life support training: A randomised controlled trial

Background

The role of e-learning in contemporary healthcare education is quickly developing. The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between the use of an e-learning simulation programme (Microsim™, Laerdal, UK) prior to attending an Advanced Life Support (ALS) course and the subsequent relationship to candidate performance.

Methods

An open label, multi-centre randomised controlled study was conducted. The control group received a course manual and pre-course MCQ four weeks prior to the face to face course. The intervention group in addition received the Microsim programme on a CD. The primary outcome was performance during a simulated cardiac arrest at the end of the course. Secondary outcomes were performance during multiple choice exams, resuscitation skills assessments and feedback to Microsim programme.

Results

572 participants were randomised (287 Microsim, 285 control). There were no significant differences in the primary outcome (performance during a standard cardiac arrest simulation) or secondary outcomes. User evaluations were favorable. 79% would recommend it to colleagues. 9% stated Microsim could replace the entire ALS course, 25% parts. Over 70% of participants’ perceived that Microsim improved their understanding of the key learning domains of the ALS course.

Conclusion

Distributing Microsim to healthcare providers prior to attending an ALS courses did not improve either cognitive or psychomotor skills performance during cardiac arrest simulation testing. The challenge that lies ahead is to identify the optimal way to use e-learning as part of a blended approach to learning for this type of training programme.     

A forgotten need: paediatric resuscitation training

This article highlights the fact that there are currently no real official recommendations regarding the provision of paediatric resuscitation training in the UK. All too often, this teaching features as no more than an ‘add on’ to adult resuscitation sessions. This is a thoroughly inadequate situation as the relatively infrequent occurrence and different aetiology of paediatric arrests necessitates specific training, based on standard guidelines, and adapted to meet the needs of the various groups who have contact with children. A three-tiered package of training is recommended, starting with nationwide paediatric Basic Life Support (BLS) training for the general public. In addition to BLS, healthcare personnel need to be trained in appropriate use of airway adjuncts. Paediatric Advanced Life Support (ALS) is also essential for all medical, nursing and paramedical staff who come into contact with acutely-ill children. In an attempt to address the need for ALS, the PALS (Paediatric Advanced Life Support) course, has been implemented in the UK. Adapted from the American PALS course, it aims to provide appropriate personnel with a systematic, research-based approach to acutely-ill children in emergency situations.     

The immediate life support course

The immediate life support course (ILS) was launched by the Resuscitation Council (UK) in January 2002. This multi-professional 1-day resuscitation course teaches the essential knowledge and skills required to manage a patient in cardiac arrest for the short time before the arrival of a cardiac arrest team or other experienced medical assistance. The ILS course also introduces healthcare professionals to the role of a cardiac arrest team member. The course provides the candidate with the knowledge and skills to recognise and treat the acutely ill patient before cardiac arrest, to manage the airway with basic techniques, and to provide rapid, safe defibrillation using either manual or automated external defibrillators (AEDs). The course includes lectures, skill stations and cardiac arrest scenarios. The ILS course has standardised much of the life support training that already takes place in UK hospitals. In 2002, 16547 candidates attended ILS courses in 128 course centres. In this article, we discuss the rationale for, and the development and structure of the ILS course. We also present the first year's results and discuss possible future developments. It is hoped that this course may become established in counties in continental Europe through the European Resuscitation Council.     

To lead or not to lead? Prospective controlled study of emergency nurses' provision of advanced life support team leadership

Background and objectives: In many emergency departments advanced life support (ALS) trained nurses do not assume a lead role in advanced resuscitation. This study investigated whether emergency nurses with previous ALS training provided good team leadership in a simulated cardiac arrest situation. Methods: A prospective study was conducted at five emergency departments and one nurses'' association meeting. All participants went through the same scenario. Details recorded included baseline blood pressure and pulse rate, time in post, time of ALS training, and subjective stress score (1 = hardly stressed; 10 = extremely stressed). Scoring took into account scenario understanding, rhythm recognition, time to defibrillation, appropriateness of interventions, and theoretical knowledge. Results: Of 57 participants, 20 were ALS trained nurses, 19 were ALS trained emergency senior house officers (SHOs), and 18 were emergency SHOs without formal ALS training. The overall mean score for doctors without ALS training was 69.5%, compared with 72.3% for ALS trained doctors and 73.7% for ALS trained nurses. Nurses found the experience less stressful (subjective stress score 5.78/10) compared with doctors without ALS training (6.5/10). The mean time taken to defibrillate from the appearance of a shockable rhythm on the monitor by the nurses and those SHOs without ALS training was 42 and 40.8 seconds, respectively. Conclusion: ALS trained nurses performed as well as ALS trained and non ALS trained emergency SHOs in a simulated cardiac arrest situation and had greater awareness of the potentially reversible causes of cardiac arrest. Thus if a senior or middle grade doctor is not available to lead the resuscitation team, it may be appropriate for experienced nursing staff with ALS training to act as ALS team leaders rather than SHOs.     

Progress of the advanced life support courses in Europe and beyond

The Advanced Life Support (ALS) course was designed initially to teach, and thereby enhance the practice and effectiveness of, resuscitation from cardiac arrest. The target candidates were doctors, nurses and paramedics, and particularly those working in areas likely to encounter such an emergency.     

The significance of hypothermia in preserving ischemic myocardium.

The clinical use of mild hypothermia to preserve ischemic cardiac and cerebral tissue continues to grow in popularity. This is a result of the known fact that hypothermia reduces myocardial oxygen demands more than any other intervention. The Advanced Life Support (ALS) Task Force of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) made the following recommendations a year ago, in October 2002: "Unconscious adult patients with spontaneous circulation after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest should be cooled to 32 degrees C to 34 degrees C for 12 to 24 hours when the initial rhythm was VF," or in-hospital even when arrest is due to other rhythms. Therapeutic use of hypothermia is in progress.     

Recall after cardiac arrest scenario testing

The Resuscitation Council (UK) Advanced Life Support (ALS) Course is a multidisciplinary training course which teaches participants how to manage the resuscitation of a patient at risk of or in cardiac arrest. To reduce variability in assessments, four standardised patient scenarios have been developed with common performance criteria. The aim of the study was to establish how much candidates remembered about their test in order to assess the potential for collusion. Eighty-nine candidates were asked immediately after testing what they remembered about their ALS scenario. Recall of the underlying problem with the simulated patient was good (85 [96%]). Forty-two [47%] correctly remembered the initial cardiac arrest rhythm and 55 [61%] the subsequent cardiac arrest rhythm. Fifty-nine [60%] candidates passed the assessment. Candidates who passed the assessment were significantly more likely to correctly recall the initial and subsequent cardiac arrest rhythms than those who did not. However, even in this group, the overall recall of all elements of the scenario was correct in only 49% of instances. This study demonstrated that immediately after testing candidates had good recall of the initial clinical scenario with which they were presented, but poor recall of cardiac arrest rhythms during the simulated resuscitation attempt. These findings provide some reassurance that the likelihood of successful collusion improving subsequent candidates performance is likely to be small as recall of the scenario progression is limited.     

Advanced life support: retention of registered nurses' knowledge 18 months after initial training.

In 1996, The Wesley Hospital introduced a 2 day Advanced Life Support (ALS) course, targeted at all critical care registered nurses and medical officers. The purpose of this study was to explore the retention of theoretical knowledge and clinical skills of registered nurses who had successfully completed the 2 day ALS course 18 months previously and to establish effective retesting timeframes. The study utilised a repeated post-test measure design. Forty registered nurses participated in the study. Data were collected during ALS retesting using scores from a theoretical examination and from the results of four practical skill assessments (basic life support, airway management, defibrillation and code management). Using Wilcoxon test, data were analysed with and compared to the participant's original scores from the training program 18 months previously. The findings demonstrate that the participant's theoretical knowledge remained at an equivalent level over the 18 month timeframe. However, 18 months after successfully completing an ALS course, only 75 per cent (n = 30) of participants passed the practical skill assessment components, with the 25 per cent (n = 10) requiring a second attempt to pass. The implications from this study focus on the model of assessment utilised and the dichotomy between theoretical and practical skill assessment results. Additional study is required to determine the optimal timeframe for ALS retesting and educational strategies to help retain skills over time.     

Education for cardiac arrest – Treatment or prevention?

In-hospital cardiac arrests (IHCA) occur infrequently and individual staff members working on general wards may only rarely encounter one. Mortality following IHCA is high and the evidence for the benefits of many advanced life support (ALS) interventions is scarce. Nevertheless, regular, often frequent, ALS training is mandatory for many hospital medical staff and nurses. The incidence of pre-cardiac arrest deterioration is much higher than that of cardiac arrests, and there is evidence that intervention prior to cardiac arrest can reduce the incidence of IHCA. This article discusses a proposal to reduce the emphasis on widespread ALS training and to increase education in the recognition and response to pre-arrest clinical deterioration.     

Cost-effectiveness and benefit of alternatives to improve training for prehospital trauma care in Mexico

INTRODUCTION: In Latin America, there is a preponderance of prehospital trauma deaths. However, scarce resources mandate that any improvements in prehospital medical care must be cost-effective. This study sought to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of several approaches to improving training for personnel in three ambulance services in Mexico. METHODS: In Monterrey, training was augmented with PreHospital Trauma Life Support (PHTLS) at a cost of [US] dollar 150 per medic trained. In San Pedro, training was augmented with Basic Trauma Life Support (BTLS), Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS), and a locally designed airway management course, at a cost of dollar 400 per medic. Process and outcome of trauma care were assessed before and after the training of these medics and at a control site. RESULTS: The training was effective for both intervention services, with increases in basic airway maneuvers for patients in respiratory distress in Monterrey (16% before versus 39% after) and San Pedro (14% versus 64%). The role of endotrachal intubation for patients with respiratory distress increased only in San Pedro (5% versus 46%), in which the most intensive Advanced Life Support (ALS) training had been provided. However, mortality decreased only in Monterrey, where it had been the highest (8.2% before versus 4.7% after) and where the simplest and lowest cost interventions were implemented. There was no change in process or outcome in the control site. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the importance of assuring uniform, basic training for all prehospital providers. This is a more cost-effective approach than is higher-cost ALS training for improving prehospital trauma care in environments such as Latin America.     

Extrication of entrapped victims from motor vehicle accidents: the crew concept.

During the extrication process the trauma victim is at high risk for additional injuries or aggravation of existing lesions. Improper handling during extrication with poor concern and knowledge of the ongoing resuscitation process may increase the time spent at the scene and expose the patient to unnecessary risks. Earlier studies report a significant number of neurological injuries that appear to be a result of the extrication process, or of inadequate immobilization during transport. Recent work also underlines the need for appropriate and situation adapted Advanced Life Support (ALS) procedures to improve outcome after prehospital trauma resuscitation. In this paper we present a method for training advanced extrication of trauma victims and the results obtained after five consecutive courses. The training focuses on enhanced liaison between medical and technical team members to optimize synchronization of operations. The course consists of both theoretical lectures and practical training in different crash scenarios. The complexity of the scenarios increases throughout the course and different extrication techniques and strategies are practised. Both the times to extrication and on-scene times were reduced during the 3-day course. Therapeutic interventions and handling of the patient were also improved, in terms of early recognition of medical and technical risks and reduction of the time of no therapy.     

A strategy for nurse defibrillation in general wards

Reducing the delay to defibrillation has a major impact on chance of survival from cardiac arrest. A high proportion of cardiac arrests occur in general ward areas, and the teaching and application of defibrillation is as much a priority there as in high dependency areas. The patients most likely to survive in-hospital cardiac arrests are those whom return of spontaneous circulation had been achieved by the first responder. In most clinical areas the first responder is likely to be a nurse. Nurses in Brighton had been taught manual defibrillation for many years, but were often reluctant to use their skills. We introduced a course specifically designed for ward nurses, covering rhythm recognition and defibrillation, with the objective of training large numbers and making the skill so prevalent that it would become an accepted nurse procedure. RESULTS: Ninety-eight nurses were trained during 1996. By the end of that year, nurses in general ward areas performed defibrillation in 80% of all cases where a shock was required at any time during the resuscitation attempt. However, only 3/25 (12%) of patients in a primary shockable rhythm were defibrillated before a member of the cardiac arrest team arrived. One hundred and forty-nine additional nurses were trained during 1997/8. By the end of this two year period there was no increase in the overall percentage of nurse defibrillations, but the number of patients in primary VF/VT defibrillated before the arrival of the cardiac arrest team had markedly increased to 17/37 (46%, P < 0.02). During this period the overall hospital survival to discharge from primary VF/VT showed a non significant improvement from 41 to 55%. CONCLUSION: We believe that it is not sufficient simply to permit nurse defibrillation, it must be perceived as a routine skill within the environment of an acute hospital.     

The European Resuscitation Council's paediatric life support course 'Advanced Paediatric Life Support'

The poor outcome for resuscitation from cardiopulmonary arrest in childhood is widely recognised. The European Resuscitation Council has adopted the Advanced Paediatric Life Support course (originating in the UK and now available in a number of countries) as its course for providers caring for children. This paper outlines the course content and explains its remit, which is to reduce avoidable deaths in childhood by not only resuscitation from cardiac arrest but, more effectively, by recognising and treating in a timely and effective fashion life-threatening illness and injury in infants and children. Two related courses Paediatric Life Support, a less intense course for less advanced providers, and Pre-Hospital Paediatric Life Support for immediate care providers are also described.     

Does advanced life support provide benefits to patients?: A literature review

INTRODUCTION: Emergency medical services have invested substantial resources to establish advanced life support (ALS) programs. However, it is unclear whether ALS care provides better outcomes to patients compared to basic life support (BLS) care. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the current evidence regarding the benefits of ALS. METHODS: Electronic medical databases were searched to identify articles that directly compared ALS versus BLS care. A total of 455 articles were found. Articles were excluded for the following reasons: (1) the article was not written in English; (2) BLS response was not compared to an ALS response; (3) a physician or nurse was included as part of the ALS response; (4) it was an aeromedical response; or (5) defibrillation was included in the ALS, but not the BLS, scope of care. Twenty-one articles met the inclusion criteria for this literature review. RESULTS: Results were divided into four categories: (1) trauma; (2) cardiac arrest; (3) myocardial infarction; and (4) altered mental status. Trauma: The majority of articles showed that ALS provided no benefits over BLS in urban trauma patients. In fact, most studies showed higher mortality rates for trauma patients receiving ALS care. Further research is needed to evaluate the benefits of ALS for rural trauma patients, and whether ALS care improves outcomes in subgroups of urban trauma patents. Cardiac Arrest: Cardiac arrest studies show that early CPR plus early defibrillation provide the greatest improvement in survival. However, most cardiac arrest research includes defibrillation as an ALS skill which has now moved into the BLS scope of care. The 2004 multi-center OPALS study provided good evidence that ALS does not improve cardiac arrest survival over early defibrillation. Further research is needed to address whether any ALS interventions improve cardiac arrest outcome. Myocardial Infarction: Only one study directly compared the outcome of BLS and ALS care on myocardial infarction. The study found no difference in outcomes between BLS and ALS care in an urban setting. Advanced Life Support: Only one study directly compared the outcome of BLS and ALS care on patients with altered mental status. The study found that the same number of patients had improved to "alert" on arrival at the emergency department, but there was a decreased length of emergency department stay for patients treated by ALS for hypoglycemia. Limitations: This review article does not take into account the benefits of 2005 ALS interventions, such as thrombolytics, dextrose, or nitroglycerin, since no studies directly compared these interventions to BLS care. Furthermore, only one study in this literature review was a large, multi-center trial. CONCLUSIONS: ALS shows little, if any, benefits for urban trauma patients. Cardiac arrest studies show that ALS does not provide additional benefits over BLS-defibrillation care, but more research is needed in this area. In two small studies, ALS care did not provide benefits over BLS care for patients with myocardial infarctions or altered mental status. Larger-scale studies are needed to evaluate which specific ALS interventions improve patient outcomes.