Oral contraceptive use and risk of breast cancer in older women (New Zealand)

the effect of oral contraceptive (OC) use at older ages on the risk of breast cancer was examined in a national population-based case-control study conducted in New Zealand. A total of 891 women aged 25 to 54 years with a first diagnosis of breast cancer, and 1,864 control subjects, randomly selected from the electoral rolls, were interviewed. The relative risk (RR) of breast cancer for women aged 45 to 54 years at diagnosis who had ever used OCs was 1.0 (95 percent confidence interval [CI]=0.77–1.3). There was no significant increase in risk of breast cancer among recent users of OCs of any age. Analyses according to age at first and last use among women aged 40 years and older at diagnosis showed no group with an elevated risk of breast cancer. Women who had used OCs for 10 years or longer after age 40 had an apparent increase in risk (RR=2.7, CI=0.97–7.5), but the trend in risk with duration of use was not significant. These findings suggest that OC use in older women does not affect their risk of breast cancer appreciably, but it is not possible to rule out a modest increase in risk with such use.This research was supported by grants from the Medical Research Council of New Zealand and from the Special Programme of Research, Development, and Research Training in Human Reproduction, World Health Organization.     

Recent oral contraceptive use and risk of breast cancer (United States)

We examined the association between recent oral contraceptive (OC) use and the risk of breast cancer in data from a large population-based case-control study in the United States. Cases (n=6,751) were women less than 75 years old who had breast cancer identified from statewide tumor registries in Wisconsin, Massachusetts, Maine, and New Hampshire. Controls (n=9,311) were selected randomly from lists of licensed drivers (if aged under 65 years) and from lists of Medicare beneficiaries (if aged 65 through 74 years). Information on OC use, reproductive experiences, and family and medical history was obtained by telephone interview. After adjustment for parity, age at first delivery, and other risk factors, women who had ever used OCs were at similar risk of breast cancer as never-users (relative risk [RR]=1.1, 95 percent confidence interval [CI]=10–1.2). Total duration of usealso was not related to risk. There was a suggestion that more recent use was associated with an increased risk of breast cancer; use less than two years ago was associated with an RR of 1.3 (CI=0.9–1.9). However, only among women aged 35 to 45 years at diagnosis was the increase in risk among recent users statistically significantly elevated (RR=2.0, CI=1.1–3.9). Use prior to the first pregnancy or among nulliparous women was not associated with increased risk. Among recent users of OCs, the risk associated with use was greatest among non-obese women, e.g., among women with body mass index (kg/m²) less than 20.4, RR=1.7, CI=1.1–2.8. While these results suggest that, in general, breast cancer risk is not increased substantially among women who have used OCs, they also are consistent with a slight increased risk among subgroups of recent users.Authors are with the University of Wisconsin Comprehensive Cancer Center, Madison, WI, USA (Dr Newcomb, Ms Trentham Dietz); NIEHS Epidemiology Branch, Research Triangle Park, NC (Dr Longnecker); Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA (Dr Surer); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pritzker School of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL (Dr Mittendorf); Department of Community and Family Medicine, Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, NH (Dr Baron); Boston University, School of Public Health, Boston, MA (Dr Clapp); Department of Epidemiology and Department of Nutrition, Harvard School of Public Health, and Channing Laboratory, Harvard Medical School and Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA (Dr Willett). Address correspondence to: Dr Polly A. Newcomb, University of Wisconsin-Madison Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1300 University Ave., #4780, Madison, WI 53706, USA. Supported by Public Health Service (National Cancer Institute) grants R01 CA 47147 and R01 CA 47305.     

Reproductive factors,hormone use and gastric cancer risk: The Singapore Chinese Health Study

Gastric cancer incidence varies greatly worldwide, but is consistently twice as high in men than in women. The hormone‐related factors hypothesized to be associated with lower risk of gastric cancer in women have not been fully explored in populations with a high background risk of gastric cancer. The Singapore Chinese Health Study (SCHS) is a prospective cohort study in which 34,022 of the participants enrolled between 1993 and 1998 were women between 45 and 74 years of age. Information on reproductive histories, hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and oral contraceptive (OC) use was collected through in‐person interviews at baseline. As of December 31, 2013, 269 incident gastric cancer cases were identified. Multivariable‐adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to evaluate gastric cancer risk associations. Older age at natural menopause (≥55 versus <45 years: HR = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.25–0.99), type of menopause (other versus natural: HR = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.27–0.87) and greater years of menstrual cycling (fourth versus first quartile: HR = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.46–0.96) were associated with a decreased risk of gastric cancer. Ever use of OCs and HRT was also associated with reduced risk of gastric cancer; the multivariable‐adjusted HRs (95% CIs) were 0.40 (0.17–0.90) for use of HRT >3 years and 0.67 (0.47–0.94) for ever use of OCs, compared with never use. Reproductive factors associated with a longer window of fertility and the use of exogenous hormones were shown to reduce gastric cancer development in a cohort of Chinese women with a high background risk of gastric cancer.     

Hormone replacement therapy and breast cancer in former users of oral contraceptives--The Norwegian Women and Cancer study

Combined estrogen-progestin menopausal therapy (HRT) and combined estrogen-progestin contraceptives (OC) both increase breast cancer risk during current use and a few years after. We investigated risk of breast cancer in women who were users of HRT dependant on former history of OC use in a large, national population-based cohort study, the Norwegian Women and Cancer study (NOWAC). Exposure information was collected through postal questionnaires. Based on follow-up of 30,118 postmenopausal women by linkage to national registers of cancer, deaths, and emigration we revealed 540 incident breast cancer cases between 1996 and 2004. Compared to never users of either drugs current use of HRT gave a significant (p = 0.002) higher risk of breast cancer in former OC users, RR = 2.45 (95% CI 1.92-3.12), than among never users of OCs, RR = 1.67 (1.32-2.12). Relative risk of current use of HRT was similar for estrogen only and combinations with progestin added in ever users of OCs. The increased risk of breast cancer in current HRT users with a history of former OC use could have potential great impact on postmenopausal breast cancer risk as the proportion of postmenopausal women with former OC use will continue to increase.     

Breast cancers among very young premenopausal women (United States)

Objective: To assess risk factors for breast cancer among very young compared to older premenopausal women. Methods: Between 1990 and 1992 a population-based case–control study conducted in Atlanta, GA, Seattle/Puget Sound, WA, and central NJ interviewed 3307 premenopausal women aged 20–54 years. Logistic regression models estimated adjusted relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for each of three 10-year age groups. Results: Among the youngest age group (<35 years, n = 545), significant predictors of risk included African-American race (RR = 2.66; 95% CI 1.4–4.9) and recent use of oral contraceptives (RR = 2.26; 95% CI 1.4–3.6). Although these relationships were strongest for estrogen receptor-negative (ER–) tumors (RRs of 3.30 for race and 3.56 for recent oral contraceptive use), these associations were also apparent for young women with ER+ tumors. Delayed childbearing was a risk factor for ER+ tumors among the older premenopausal women (p _trend < 0.01), but not for women <35 years in whom early childbearing was associated with an increased risk, reflecting a short-term increase in risk immediately following a birth. Family history of early-onset breast cancer was more strongly associated with risk among women <35 years (RR = 3.22) than those 45–54 years (RR = 1.51). Risk factors for premenopausal breast cancer not significantly modified by age at diagnosis included early age at menarche, low body mass index, and heavy alcohol consumption. Conclusion: These findings suggest the possibility that women who develop breast cancers at very young ages may be etiologically as well as clinically distinct.     

Type of postmenopausal hormone use and risk of breast cancer: 12-year follow-up from the Nurses' Health Study

We prospectively examined the use of hormone replacement therapy in relation to breast cancer incidence in a cohort of women 30 to 55 years of age in 1976. During 12 years of follow-up (480,665 person-years) among postmenopausal women, 1,050 incident cases of breast cancer were documented. Overall, past users of replacement estrogen were not at increased risk. After adjustment for established risk factors, type of menopause, age at menopause, and current age, the rate ratio (RR) was 0.91, 95 percent confidence interval (CI) = 0.78–1.07. the risk of breast cancer was elevated significantly among current users (RR = 1.33, CI = 1.12–1.57); after adjusting for age, we observed no evidence of increasing risk with increasing duration of use among current users (P trend = 0.41), or among past users (P trend = 0.46). Women currently using unopposed estrogen (RR = 1.42, CI = 1.19–1.70), estrogen and progesterone (RR = 1.54, CI = 0.99–2.39), or progesterone alone (RR = 2.52, CI = 0.66–9.63), were all at increased risk of breast cancer compared with never users. These data suggest that long-term past use of estrogen replacement therapy is not related to risk, that current estrogen use increases risk of breast cancer to a modest degree, and that the addition of progesterone does not remove the increased risk observed with current use of unopposed estrogen.The authors are with the Nurses' Health Study, Channing Laboratory, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. Address correspondence to Dr Colditz, Channing Laboratory, 180 Longwood Ave., Boston, MA 02115-5899, USA. Supported by research grant CA40356 from the National Cancer Institute, NIH, Department of Health and Human Services. Dr Colditz is supported by an American Cancer Society Faculty Research Award FRA-398.     

A prospective study of different types of hormone replacement therapy use and the risk of subsequent breast cancer: the women's health in the Lund area (WHILA) study (Sweden)

Objectives: Reports suggest that combined estrogen plus progestin hormone replacement therapy (HRT) confers a higher breast cancer risk than estrogen alone. We aimed to establish whether breast cancer risk depends on the type of HRT formula. Methods: The cohort consisted of 6586 women, aged 50–64 years, from the Lund area, Sweden, with no reported breast cancer upon inclusion. We obtained information such as HRT use through a questionnaire between December 1995 and February 2000. New breast cancers were identified through the South Swedish tumor registry. Results: Between inclusion and December 2001, 101 women developed breast cancer. Only ever use of the continuous combined estrogen plus progestin (CCEP) formula differed between cases and controls (45.2% versus 23.5%; p = 0.000001). Compared with never users, exclusive CCEP users had the highest age-adjusted hazard ratio HR 3.3 (95% CI: 1.9–5.6; p < 0.001), followed by users of CCEP in addition to other HRT formulas HR 2.8 (95% CI: 1.4–5.5; p = 0.003). No significant increase was seen in women who exclusively used other HRT formulas. Conclusion: Women who used CCEP had over three times the risk of developing breast cancer compared with never users and twice the risk compared with users of other types of HRT.     

Tubal sterilization and risk of breast cancer mortality in US women

Objective: To investigate the hypothesis that tubal sterilization is associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer. Methods: We examined this hypothesis in a large prospective study of US adults. After 14 years of mortality follow-up, 3837 deaths from breast cancer were observed in a cohort of 619,199 women who were cancer-free at study entry in 1982. Results: Cox proportional hazards models (adjusted for multiple breast cancer risk factors) showed a significant inverse association between tubal sterilization and breast cancer mortality (adjusted rate ratio (RR) = 0.82, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.70–0.96). Women who were sterilized before age 35 had a lower risk (adjusted RR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.53–0.88) than women who were sterilized at 35 years of age or older (adjusted RR = 0.92, 95% CI 0.75–1.13). Also, sterilizations performed before 1975 resulted in a lower risk (RR = 0.75, 95% CI 0.62–0.91) than those performed during or after 1975 (RR = 0.98, 95% CI 0.74–1.29), possibly reflecting the likelihood of greater tissue damage with earlier procedures. Conclusions: These results suggest that tubal sterilization may lower subsequent risk of breast cancer, especially among women who are sterilized at a relatively young age. Additional studies are needed to confirm or refute these findings.     

Risks of breast and endometrial cancer after estrogen and estrogen–progestin replacement

Objective: We studied the risk of breast and endometrial cancer in a cohort of 11,231 Swedish women prescribed different replacement hormone regimens.Methods: All 10,472 women at risk of developing breast cancer and 8,438 women at risk of endometrial cancer were followed up from the time of the questionnaire in 1987–88 through 1993, by record-linkages to the National Swedish Cancer Registry. Using data from a questionnaire we analyzed the relationships between hormone exposures and cancer risk, with non-compliers and users of less than 1 year as a reference group.Results: For breast cancer, women reporting use of estrogens combined with progestins had evidence of an increased risk relative to women denying intake or taking hormones for less than 1 year; relative risk (RR) = 1.4 (95% confidence interval 0.9–2.3) after 1–6 years of intake, and RR=1.7 (95% CI 1.1–2.6) after more than 6 years. This excess risk seemed confined to recent exposure. We found no association with intake of estrogens alone using non-compliers and short-term takers as the reference group. The risk of invasive endometrial cancer was increased four-fold in women using medium-potency estrogens alone for 6 years or longer, RR = 4.2 (95% CI 2.5–8.4). Women on such long-term progestin-combined treatment had a lower, non-significant, excess risk (RR = 1.4; 95% CI 0.6–3.3).Conclusions: We conclude that long-term recent use of estrogen–progestin combined replacement therapy may increase the risk of breast cancer. Exposure to estrogen alone substantially elevates the risk of endometrial cancer, an increase that can be reduced or perhaps avoided by adding progestins.     

Hormone replacement therapy is not associated with an increased risk of leukemia (United States)

Objective Recent studies have reported an increased risk of certain cancers associated with hormone replacement therapy (HRT), possibly due to stimulation of estrogen receptors. Since estrogen receptors are expressed on certain hematopoietic cells, it is possible that HRT use may also increase the risk of leukemia.Methods A cohort of 37,172 post-menopausal Iowa women ages 55–69 years with no history of prior cancer was linked annually to the population-based state cancer registry through 2001. In addition to other self-reported cancer risk factors, participants were asked about current and former use of HRT in 1986 and on four subsequent follow-up questionnaires. A total of 201 cases of leukemia were identified over 16 years of follow-up including 74 acute myeloid leukemias (AMLs) and 87 chronic lymphocytic leukemias (CLLs).Results Compared to never users of HRT at study baseline, current [multivariate relative risk (RR), 1.09; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.70–1.71)] and former users (RR=0.82, 95% CI=0.59–1.15) were at no increased risk of developing leukemia. For AML, current users also had no increased risk (RR=0.83, 95% CI=0.37–1.84) and there was a suggestion that former users had a slightly decreased risk (RR=0.66, 95% CI=0.37–1.17). For CLL, all RRs were around unity.Conclusion We conclude that HRT is unlikely to be an appreciable risk factor for leukemia.     

Estrogen-progestin replacement therapy and breast cancer risk: the Women's Health Study (United States)

Objective: While there is substantial evidence that unopposed estrogen use increases the risk of breast cancer, there are limited data from epidemiologic studies on the impact of estrogen–progestin combinations. We therefore examined estrogen–progestin replacement therapy and breast cancer risk in the Women's Health Study. Methods: We investigated postmenopausal hormone (PMH) use among 17,835 apparently healthy postmenopausal women aged 45 years, and followed them prospectively for an average of 5.9 years. Breast cancer occurred in 411 women. Results: The multivariate relative risks of all breast cancer associated with never use of PMH, use of estrogen replacement therapy (ERT), and use of estrogen–progestin replacement therapy (HRT) were 1.00 (referent), 0.96 (95% CI 0.65–1.42), and 1.37 (95% CI 1.05–1.78). The increase in risk among users of HRT was largely limited to those women who had used estrogen–progestin replacement therapy for five years or more, and to those women who were on continuous rather than cyclic progestin combinations. Higher doses of estrogen, but not progestin, were associated with increased breast cancer risk, compared with lower doses. Conclusions: These prospective data suggest that use of estrogen–progestin replacement therapy imparts an increased risk of breast cancer in comparison with never use of PMH.     

Prospective study of exogenous hormone use and breast cancer in Seventh-day Adventists

Exogenous hormone use as either oral contraceptives (OC) or hormone replacement therapy (HRT) was evaluated in reference to subsequent breast cancer risk in a cohort study of 20,341 Seventh-day Adventist women, residing in California, who completed a detailed lifestyle questionnaire in 1976 and who were followed for 6 years. During the follow-up period, 215 histologically confirmed primary breast cancers were detected in the cohort. The mean age at diagnosis was 66 years, indicating a primarily postmenopausal case series. In this cohort, after taking into account potentially confounding variables, current use of HRT (in 1976) was associated with a 69% increase in breast cancer risk, which was statistically significant (RR = 1.69; CI = 1.12-2.55). However, there was no strong increase in risk with increasing duration of use of HRT. Subgroups of women who did experience HRT associated increases in breast cancer risk included those women who had ever used HRT (RR = 1.39; CI = 1.00-1.94) and those with no history of maternal breast cancer (RR = 1.45), those women with prior benign breast disease (RR = 2.80), and those women who experienced menopause at 44 years of age or later (RR = 1.56). There was no substantial increase in breast cancer risk associated with use of OC in this population, although among women with exposure to both OC and HRT there was a suggested increase in risk (RR = 1.42; CI = 0.71-2.85).     

Use of Exogenous Hormones and Risk of Papillary Thyroid Cancer (Washington, United States)

Objectives: Greater incidence of thyroid cancer in women than men, particularly evident during the reproductive years, has led to the suggestion that female hormones may increase risk of this disease. We conducted a population-based case-control study in women aged 18 to 64 years in three counties of western Washington State (United States) to assess the relation of use of exogenous hormones, including oral contraceptives (OC) and hormone replacement therapy (HRT), to risk of papillary thyroid cancer.Methods: Of 558 women with thyroid cancer of the follicular epithelium diagnosed during 1988-94 who were identified as eligible, 468 (83.9 percent) were interviewed; this analysis was restricted to women with papillary histology (n = 410). Controls (n = 574) were identified by random digit dialing, with a response proportion of 73.6 percent. Logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (OR) and associated 95 percent confidence intervals (CI) estimating the relative risk of papillary thyroid cancer among users of exogenous hormones.Results: Among women aged 45 to 64 years, we observed no association of use of OCs or HRT with risk of papillary thyroid cancer. Among women less than 45 years of age, risk of papillary thyroid cancer was reduced in women who had ever used OCs (OR = 0.6, CI = 0.4-0.9); beyond the relation with ever-use, there was no further association with specific aspects of exposure such as estrogenic potency, latency, recency, age at first or last use, or use at the reference date.Conclusions: Our data do not support the hypothesis that use of exogenous estrogens increases the risk of female thyroid cancer. Cancer Causes and Control 1998, 9, 341-349     

Obesity,body size,and risk of postmenopausal breast cancer: the Women's Health Initiative (United States)

OBJECTIVE: Body size is an important modifiable risk factor for breast cancer. Although obesity has generally been found to be associated with increased risk for postmenopausal breast cancer, there remain questions concerning the role of body fat distribution, lifetime weight history, and effects within specific subgroups of women.METHODS: We assessed the relationship of several anthropometric measures and risk of postmenopausal breast cancer in 85,917 women aged 50–79 at entry in the Women's Health Initiative Observational Study. Women were enrolled during 1993–1998 at 40 clinics in the US and 1030 developed invasive breast cancer by April 2000. Upon entry, trained clinical center staff measured each woman's height, weight, and waist and hip circumference.RESULTS: Anthropometric factors were not associated with breast cancer among women who had ever used hormone replacement therapy (HRT). Among HRT non-users, heavier women (baseline body mass index (BMI) > 31.1) had an elevated risk of postmenopausal breast cancer (relative risk (RR) = 2.52; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.62–3.93), compared to slimmer women (baseline BMI 22.6). The elevation in risk associated with increasing BMI appeared to be most pronounced among younger postmenopausal women. Change in BMI since age 18, maximum BMI, and weight were also associated with breast cancer in HRT non-users. While both waist and hip circumference were associated with breast cancer risk, their ratio, a measure of fat distribution, was not (RR = 1.33; 95% CI = 0.88–2.01).CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms previously reported findings that generalized obesity is an important risk factor for postmenopausal breast cancer, but only among women who have never taken HRT. Lifetime weight gain is also a strong predictor of breast cancer. Waist to hip ratio, a measure of weight distribution, does not appear to be related to postmenopausal breast cancer risk.     

Estrogen replacement therapy and risk of fatal breast cancer in a prospective cohort of postmenopausal women in the United States

This study examines the relationship between fatal breast cancer and use of estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) among women in a large prospective study in the United States. After nine years of follow-up, 1,469 breast cancer deaths were observedin a cohort of 422,373 postmenopausal women who were cancer free at study entry and who supplied information on estrogen use. Results from Cox proportional hazards modeling, adjusted for 11 other potential risk factors, showed that ever-use of ERT was associated with a significantly decreased risk of fatal breast cancer (rate ratio [RR]=0.84,95 percent confidence interval [CI]=0.75–0.94). There was a moderate trend (P=0.07) of decreasing risk with younger age at first use of ERT. This decreased risk was most pronounced in women who experienced natural menopause before the age of 40 years (RR=0.59, CI=0.40–0.87). There was no discernible trend of increasing risk with duration of use in estrogen users at baseline or former users, nor was there any trend in years since last use in former users. The relationship between ERT and breast cancer mortality differed by age at menarche and by a self-reported history of breast cysts. No increased risk of fatal breast cancer with ERT was observed with estrogen use status (baseline/former), age at first use, duration of use, or years since last use. These findings suggest that ever-use of ERT is associated with a 16 percent decreased risk of fatal breast cancer.     

Oral contraceptive use and breast cancer risk among African-American women

Recent epidemiologic studies, most of them in predominantly White populations, have suggested that long duration of oral contraceptive (OC) use may increase the risk of breast cancer at young ages. We assessed the relationship of OC use to the risk of breast cancer in African-American women aged 25 to 59 years, using interview data from a multipurpose hospital-based case-control study. Five hundred and twenty-four cases hospitalized for invasive breast cancer were compared with 1,021 controls with nonmalignant conditions unrelated to OC use. Relative risks (RR) and 95 percent confidence intervals (CI) were estimated relative to a reference category of use for less than 12 months; potential confounders were controlled by multiple logistic regression analysis. Among women under age 45, three or more years of OC use was associated with an increased risk of breast cancer: the RR estimate was 2.8 (CI=1.5–5.0) for three to four years of use, and declined to 1.5 (CI=0.8.3.0) for 10 or more years of use. Recency and timing of use did not explain the observed association. Among women aged 45 to 59, OC use was associated with little or no increase in risk: the RR estimate for three or more years of use was 1.3 (CI=0.7–2.4). The findings add to the evidence from studies of White women and a recent study of Black women which have suggested an increased risk of breast cancer at young ages for moderate or long duration use of OCs.This research was supported by the US National Cancer Institute (grants R01 CA55766 and R01 CA45762). Additional support was provided by the US Food and Drug Administration (FD-U-000082); the views expressed do not necessarily represent the views of the Food and Drug Administration. The Slone Epidemiology Unit also receives support from Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc., and Marion Merrell Dow Inc.     

Exogenous hormones,reproductive history,and colon cancer (Seattle,Washington, USA)

The associations between exogenous hormones, reproductive history, and colon cancer were investigated in a case-control study among women aged 30–62 years. The study was conducted in the Seattle, Washington (USA) metropolitan area between 1985 and 1989 and included 193 incident cases of colon cancer and 194 controls. There was little overall association between colon cancer and oral contraceptive use, parity, age at first birth, hysterectomy or oophorectomy status, or age at menopause. Use of noncontraceptive hormones at or after age 40, most likely hormone replacement therapy (HRT), was associated with decreased risk of colon cancer (adjusted odds ratio [OR]=0.60, 95 percent confidence interval [CI]=0.35–1.01), particularly among women with more than five years of use (OR=0.47, 95 percent CI=0.24–0.91). While results from previous studies have not been consistent, any protective effect of HRT against colon cancer would be important given the continuing debate over its potential risks and benefits.Support for this study was provided by grant CA44790. Mr Jacobs was supported by the Cancer Prevention Training Grant T32 CA09661. This study was performed at the Cancer Prevention Research Program, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA.     

Use of oral contraceptives and breast cancer risk: The Norwegian-Swedish Women's Lifestyle and Health Cohort Study.

Current use of oral contraceptives (OCs) has been reported to increase breast cancer risk slightly. In 1991/1992, a prospective cohort study specifically designed to examine the role of hormonal contraceptives in relation to breast cancer was conducted in Norway and Sweden. This study was entitled Women's Lifestyle and Health. Of 196,000 invited women aged 30-49 years, 106,844 women answered a 4-page questionnaire. Altogether, 103,027 women providing information on contraceptive use were included in the analysis presented here, and 1,008 primary invasive breast cancers were diagnosed throughout 1999 (end of follow-up). Proportional hazard regression was used to calculate relative risks (RRs) with adjustment for age and other possible confounders. An increased breast cancer risk was observed among women who were current/recent users of OCs of any type at the start of follow-up [RR, 1.6; 96% confidence interval (CI), 1.2-2.1]. Current/recent use (i.e., use in the year preceding cohort enrolment) of combined OCs (RR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.0-2.0) and progestin-only pills (RR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.0-2.4) entailed similar levels of increased risk. An increased risk of borderline significance was found among short-term (i.e., less than 13 months) users before age 20 years (RR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.0-1.7) and before first full-term pregnancy (RR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.0-1.8). Long-term users of OCs were at a higher risk of breast cancer than never users (test for trend, P = 0.005). Current/recent use of OCs is associated with an increased breast cancer risk. Use of combined OCs and progestin-only pills seem to increase the risk at the same level.     

Long-term weight change and breast cancer risk: the European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition (EPIC)

We examined prospectively the association between weight change during adulthood and breast cancer risk, using data on 1358 incident cases that developed during 5.8 years of follow-up among 40,429 premenopausal and 57,923 postmenopausal women from six European countries, taking part in the European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition study. Multivariate Cox regression models were used to calculate hazard ratios according to weight change (kg), defined as the weight difference between age at enrollment and age 20 adjusted for other risk factors. Changes in weight were not associated with premenopausal breast cancer risk. In postmenopausal women, weight gain was positively associated with breast cancer risk only among noncurrent hormone replacement therapy (HRT) users (P-trend < or = 0.0002). Compared to women with a stable weight (+/-2 kg), the relative risk for women who gained 15-20 kg was 1.50 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.06-2.13). The pooled RR per weight gain increment of 5 kg was 1.08 (95% CI 1.04-1.12). Weight gain was not associated with breast cancer risk in current HRT users, although, overall, these women experienced a much higher risk of breast cancer compared with nonusers. Our findings suggest that large adult weight gain was a significant predictor of breast cancer in postmenopausal women not taking exogenous hormones.     

Multiple primary breast and thyroid cancers: role of age at diagnosis and cancer treatments (United States)

Background:Breast and thyroid cancer have been observed to occur more frequently than expected as multiple primary tumors in women. The study presented herein focuses on the effects of age at diagnosis and treatment for the first cancer on the development of the second cancer. Methods:This retrospective cohort study used a study population consisting of 38,632 women diagnosed with primary invasive breast cancer and 2189 women diagnosed with primary invasive thyroid cancer between 1974 and 1994. Cases were identified from records of the Cancer Surveillance System of western Washington and followed for subsequent cancer development through 1995. Results:Seventy-one women were diagnosed during their lives with both breast and thyroid cancers. Including cancers diagnosed during the same month as or after the initial cancer, the relative risk (RR) of breast cancer among women with thyroid cancer was 1.5 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1–2.0), and the RR of thyroid cancer among women with breast cancer was 1.5 (95% CI 1.1–2.2). Among women with thyroid cancer, risk of breast cancer was greatest when the latter cancer was diagnosed under 45 years of age (RR = 2.3, 95% CI 1.1–4.4). First course of treatment, including radiation or hormonal therapy to treat thyroid cancer, and radiation, chemotherapy, or hormonal therapy to treat breast cancer, did not alter a woman's risk of developing the second cancer. Conclusions:The data suggest that the incidence of breast and thyroid cancer may be related, and that in particular women with thyroid cancer may be at a moderately increased risk of developing breast cancer before age 45.