90Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan in the treatment of relapsed or refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

OBJECTIVE: Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) is the most frequently diagnosed malignancy of the immune system, with more than 53,900 new cases diagnosed in 2002. Conventional cancer therapies cure many, but not the majority of, cases of the aggressive forms of NHL, and the more indolent and follicular forms of the disease that affect nearly half of all patients with NHL are considered incurable. In the absence of cure or survival benefits, treatments such as radioimmunotherapy that induce remission and prolong time off therapy are considered valuable. (90)Y-Ibritumomab tiuxetan recently became the first radioimmunotherapy agent to be approved for commercial use by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. After reading this article, the nuclear medicine technologist should be able to understand the incidence and prevalence of NHL, describe the ibritumomab tiuxetan therapy protocol, explain specific infusion techniques for this protocol, list acquisition parameters after injection of (111)In-ibritumomab tiuxetan, and describe specific safety techniques to keep risk as low as reasonably achievable while performing the therapy protocol.     

Phase I/II 90Y-Zevalin (yttrium-90 ibritumomab tiuxetan, IDEC-Y2B8) radioimmunotherapy dosimetry results in relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

Dosimetry studies in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma were performed to estimate the radiation absorbed dose to normal organs and bone marrow from 90Y-Zevalin (yttrium-90 ibritumomab tiuxetan, IDEC-Y2B8) treatment in this phase I/II, multicenter trial. The trial was designed to determine the dose of Rituximab (chimeric anti-CD20, Rituxan, IDEC-C2B8, MabThera), the unlabeled antibody given prior to the radioconjugate to clear peripheral blood B cells and optimize distribution, and to determine the maximum tolerated dose of 90Y-Zevalin [7.4, 11, or 15 MBq/kg (0.2, 0.3, or 0.4 mCi/kg)]. Patients received (111)In-Zevalin (indium-111 ibritumomab tiuxetan, IDEC-In2B8 ) on day 0 followed by a therapeutic dose of 90Y-Zevalin on day 7. Both doses were preceded by an infusion of the chimeric, unlabeled antibody Rituximab. Following administration of (111)In-Zevalin, serial anterior/posterior whole-body scans were acquired. Major-organ radioactivity versus time estimates were calculated using regions of interest. Residence times were computed and entered into the MIRDOSE3 computer software program to calculate estimated radiation absorbed dose to each organ. Initial analyses of estimated radiation absorbed dose were completed at the clinical site. An additional, centralized dosimetry analysis was performed subsequently to provide a consistent analysis of data collected from the seven clinical sites. In all patients with dosimetry data (n=56), normal organ and red marrow radiation absorbed doses were estimated to be well under the protocol-defined upper limit of 20 Gy and 3 Gy, respectively. Median estimated radiation absorbed dose was 3.4 Gy to liver (range 1.2-7.8 Gy), 2.6 Gy to lungs (range 0.72-4.4 Gy), and 0.38 Gy to kidneys (range 0.07-0.61 Gy). Median estimated tumor radiation absorbed dose was 17 Gy (range 5.8-67 Gy). No correlation was noted between hematologic toxicity and the following variables: red marrow radiation absorbed dose, blood T(1/2), blood AUC, plasma T(1/2), and plasma AUC. It is concluded that 90Y-Zevalin administered at nonmyeloablative maximum tolerated doses results in acceptable radiation absorbed doses to normal organs. The only toxicity of note is hematologic and is not correlated to red marrow radiation absorbed dose estimates or T(1/2), reflecting that hematologic toxicity is dependent on bone marrow reserve in this heavily pretreated population.     

High-dose radioimmunotherapy with 90Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan: comparative dosimetric study for tailored treatment.

High-dose (90)Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan therapy and associated autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) were applied after dosimetry. This paper reports dosimetric findings for 3 different methods, including image corrections and actual organ mass corrections. Our first goal was to identify the most reliable and feasible dosimetric method to be adopted in high-dose therapy with (90)Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan. The second goal was to verify the safety of the prescribed activity and the best timing of stem cell reinfusion. METHODS: Twenty-two patients with refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma were enrolled into 3 activity groups escalating to 55.5 MBq/kg. A somewhat arbitrary cutoff of 20 Gy to organs (except red marrow) was defined as a safe limit for patient recruitment. ASCT was considered of low risk when the dose to reinfused stem cells was less than 50 mGy. (111)In-Ibritumomab tiuxetan (185 MBq) was administered for dosimetry. Blood samples were collected up to 130 h after injection to derive individual blood clearance rates and red marrow doses. Five whole-body images were acquired up to 7 d after injection. A transmission scan and a low-dose CT scan were also acquired. The conjugate-view technique was used, and images were corrected for background, scatter, and attenuation. Absorbed doses were calculated using the OLINDA/EXM software, adjusting doses for individual organ masses. The biodistribution data were analyzed for dosimetry by the conjugate-view technique using 3 methods. Method A was a patient-specific method applying background, scatter, and attenuation correction, with absorbed doses calculated using the OLINDA/EXM software and doses adjusted for individual organ masses and individually estimated blood volumes. Method B was a reference method using the organ masses of the reference man and woman phantoms. Method C was a simplified method using standard blood and red marrow volumes and no corrections. RESULTS: The medians and ranges (in parentheses) for dose estimates (mGy/MBq) according to method A were 1.7 (0.3-3.5) for lungs, 2.8 (1.8-10.6) for liver, 1.7 (0.6-3.8) for kidneys, 1.9 (0.8-5.0) for spleen, 0.8 (0.4-1.0) for red marrow, and 2.8 (1.3-4.7) for testes. None of patients had to postpone ASCT. Absorbed doses from method B differed from method A by up to 100% for liver, 80% for kidneys, 335% for spleen, and 80% for blood because of differences between standard and actual masses. Compared with method A, method C led to dose overestimates of up to 4-fold for lungs, 2-fold for liver, 5-fold for kidneys, 7-fold for spleen, 2-fold for red marrow, and 2-fold for testes. CONCLUSION: Patient-specific dosimetry with image correction and mass adjustment is recommended in high-dose (90)Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan therapy, for which liver is the dose-limiting organ. Overly simplified dosimetry may provide inaccurate information on the dose to critical organs, the recommended values of administered activity, and the timing of ASCT.     

90Y-ibritumomab therapy in refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: observations from 111In-ibritumomab pretreatment imaging

Radioimmunotherapy is an effective treatment for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). 90Y-ibritumomab is an antibody targeting CD20 receptors on the surface of lymphocytes. We present observations from our clinical experience with 90Y-ibritumomab in the management of NHL. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 28 NHL patients treated with 90Y-ibritumomab. There were 21 men and 7 women, 36-85 y old. A diagnostic dose of 111In-ibritumomab was administered on day 0, and imaging followed immediately and at 24, 48, and 72 h. The doses of 90Y-ibritumomab ranged from 629 to 1,258 MBq (17-34 mCi). Outcomes were compared with the findings of the 111In-ibritumomab scans. RESULTS: 90Y-ibritumomab induced objective responses in 22 of 28 patients. A complete response was noted in 9 patients, a partial response in 9 patients, and a mixed response in 4 patients. Three patients had stable disease, and 3 patients had disease progression. 111In-ibritumomab findings were positive in 19 patients and negative in 9 patients. A complete response was noted in 2 of 19 patients with positive findings and 7 of 9 with negative findings. A partial response was seen in 7 of 19 patients with positive findings and 1 of 9 with negative findings. Disease progression was observed in 3 of 19 patients with positive findings and 0 of 9 with negative findings. The remaining patients had a mixed response or no changes. CONCLUSION: A higher rate of complete response after 90Y-ibritumomab treatment was seen in patients with negative 111In-ibritumomab findings, whereas a higher rate of disease progression despite therapy was noted in patients with positive 111In-ibritumomab findings. This observation suggests that patients with bulky disease may require more aggressive management.     

Guideline for radioimmunotherapy of rituximab relapsed or refractory CD20(+) follicular B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

This guideline is a prerequisite for the quality management in the treatment of non-Hodgkin-lymphomas using radioimmunotherapy. It is based on an interdisciplinary consensus and contains background information and definitions as well as specified indications and detailed contraindications of treatment. Essential topics are the requirements for institutions performing the therapy. For instance, presence of an expert for medical physics, intense cooperation with all colleagues committed to treatment of lymphomas, and a certificate of instruction in radiochemical labelling and quality control are required. Furthermore, it is specified which patient data have to be available prior to performance of therapy and how the treatment has to be carried out technically. Here, quality control and documentation of labelling are of greatest importance. After treatment, clinical quality control is mandatory (work-up of therapy data and follow-up of patients). Essential elements of follow-up are specified in detail. The complete treatment inclusive after-care has to be realised in close cooperation with those colleagues (haematology-oncology) who propose, in general, radioimmunotherapy under consideration of the development of the disease.     

90Y-DOTA-hLL2: an agent for radioimmunotherapy of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

The goal of this work was to determine an optimal radioimmunotherapy agent for further development against non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. We sought to establish the stability profile of (90)Y-labeled humanized LL2 (hLL2) monoclonal antibody (mAb) when prepared with different chelating agents and, from these data, to estimate the dosimetric improvement to be expected from use of the most stable (90)Y-chelate-hLL2 complex. METHODS: The complementarity-determining region-grafted (humanized) anti-CD22 mAb, hLL2 (epratuzumab), was conjugated to 3 different chelating agents, 2 of which were derivatives of diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA) and 1 of which was the macrocyclic chelate 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-N,N',N",N"'-tetraacetic acid (DOTA). The 3 hLL2 conjugates were radiolabeled with (90)Y and tested for stability in vitro against a 10,000-fold molar excess of free DTPA over 9 d. They were also tested against normal human serum at 37 degrees C over 12 d. Each conjugate was radiolabeled with the gamma-emitting radionuclide, (88)Y, and compared for biodistribution in normal and lymphoma xenograft-bearing athymic mice. In vivo data were analyzed for statistical differences in the uptake of yttrium in bone and washed bone when either the DOTA or the Mx-DTPA chelates were used, and dosimetry calculations were made for each complex. RESULTS: (90)Y-DOTA complex of the hLL2 mAb was completely stable to either DTPA or serum challenge for the duration of either experiment (equivalent to 3.3-4.5 half-lives of (90)Y radionuclide or >90% of possible (90)Y decays from any initial starting activity). Complexes of hLL2 that had been prepared using the DTPA-type chelates lost 3%-4% of initially bound (90)Y over the first few days and about 10%-15% over the duration of the challenges. In vivo, these stability differences manifested as significantly lower yttrium uptake in bone and cortical bone over a 10-d period when DOTA was used as the yttrium chelating agent. Absorbed doses per 37 MBq (1 mCi) of (90)Y-mAb were 3,555 and 5,405 cGy for bone and 2,664 and 4,524 cGy for washed bone for (90)Y-DOTA-hLL2 and (90)Y-MxDTPA-hLL2, respectively, amounting to 52.0% and 69.8% increases in absorbed radiation doses for bone and washed bone, respectively, when a DOTA chelate was switched to a Mx-DTPA chelate. CONCLUSION: (90)Y-hLL2 prepared with the DOTA chelate represents an improved agent for radioimmunotherapy of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, with an in vivo model demonstrating a large reduction in bone-deposited yttrium, compared with (90)Y-hLL2 agents prepared with open-chain DTPA-type chelating agents. Dosimetry suggests that this benefit will result in a substantial toxicologic advantage for a DOTA-based hLL2 conjugate.     

Radioimmunotherapy of B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: from clinical trials to clinical practice.

Radioimmunotherapy (RIT) is a new treatment modality for B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). Recent clinical trials have clearly established its efficacy in NHL patients refractory to standard chemotherapy or immunotherapy with the widely used unconjugated rituximab monoclonal antibody (mAb). The Food and Drug Administration has approved (90)Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan anti-B-cell NHL mAb as the first commercially available radiolabeled antibody for cancer therapy. This comes only a few years after the introduction of rituximab into clinical practice as the first unconjugated antibody for cancer treatment, underscoring the success of both immunotherapy and RIT in the treatment of NHL. With the approval of (90)Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan, and based on the results of numerous clinical trials with radiolabeled anti-B-cell NHL mAbs, RIT promises to become integral to nuclear medicine practice. In this article, the basic concepts of RIT are reviewed with important milestones in its development for B-cell NHL treatment and particular emphasis on phase II and III clinical trials establishing its efficacy in clearly defined patient populations. Finally, the prospects for the expected widespread clinical use of RIT in the management of B-cell NHL, alone or in combination with other more established therapies, are discussed. This article provides both investigative and clinical nuclear medicine physicians with a better understanding of RIT capabilities and limitations in B-cell NHL and their role as consultants in the care of NHL patients.     

Radiation dosimetry for 90Y-2IT-BAD-Lym-1 extrapolated from pharmacokinetics using 111In-2IT-BAD-Lym-1 in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Several monoclonal antibodies, including Lym-1, have proven effective for treatment of hematologic malignancies. Lym-1, which preferentially targets malignant lymphocytes, has induced therapeutic responses and prolonged survival in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) when labeled with 131. Because radiometal-labeled monoclonal antibodies provide higher tumor radiation doses than corresponding 131I-labeled monoclonal antibodies, the radiation dosimetry of 90Y-2-iminothiolane-2-[p-(bromoacetamido)benzyl]-1,4,7,10-tetraazacyc lododecane-N,N',N",N"'-tetraacetic acid-Lym-1 (90Y-21T-BAD-Lym-1) is of importance because of its potential for radioimmunotherapy. Although 90Y has attractive properties for therapy, its secondary bremsstrahlung is less suitable for imaging and pharmacokinetic studies in patients. Thus, the pharmacokinetic data obtained for 111In-21T-BAD-Lym-1 in patients with NHL were used to calculate dosimetry for 90SY-21T-BAD-Lym-1. METHODS: Thirteen patients with advanced-stage NHLwere given a preload dose of unmodified Lym-1 followed by an imaging dose of 111In-21T-BAD-Lym-1. Sequential imaging and blood and urine samples obtained for up to 10 d after infusion were used to assess pharmacokinetics. Using 111In pharmacokinetic data and 90Y physical constants, radiation dosimetry for 90Y-21T-BAD-Lym-1 was determined. RESULTS: The uptake of 111In-21T-BAD-Lym-1 in tumors was greater than uptakes in the lung and kidney but similar to uptakes in the liver and spleen. The biologic half-time in tumors was greater than in lungs. The mean radiation dose to tumors was 6.57 +/- 3.18 Gy/GBq. The mean tumor-to-marrow (from blood) radiation ratio was 66:1, tumor-to-total body was 13:1, and tumor-to-liver was 1:1. Images of 111In were of excellent quality; tumors and normal organs were readily identified. Mild and transient Lym-1 toxicity occurred in 3 patients. CONCLUSION: Because of the long residence time of 111In-2IT-BAD-Lym-1 in tumors, high 90Y therapeutic ratios (tumor-to-tissue radiation dose) were achieved for some tissues, but the liver also showed high uptake and retention of the radiometal.     

Myeloablative 131I-tositumomab radioimmunotherapy in treating non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: comparison of dosimetry based on whole-body retention and dose to critical organ receiving the highest dose.

Myeloablative radioimmunotherapy using (131)I-tositumomab (anti-CD20) monoclonal antibodies is an effective therapy for B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. The amount of radioactivity for radioimmunotherapy may be determined by several methods, including those based on whole-body retention and on dose to a limiting normal organ. The goal of each approach is to deliver maximal myeloablative amounts of radioactivity within the tolerance of critical normal organs. METHODS: Records of 100 consecutive patients who underwent biodistribution and dosimetry evaluation after tracer infusion of (131)I-tositumomab before radioimmunotherapy were reviewed. We assessed organ and tissue activities over time by serial gamma-camera imaging to calculate radiation-absorbed doses. Organ volumes were determined from CT scans for organ-specific dosimetry. These dose estimates helped us to determine therapy on the basis of projected dose to the critical normal organ receiving a maximum tolerable radiation dose. We compared organ-specific dosimetry for treatment planning with the whole-body dose-assessment method by retrospectively analyzing the differences in projected organ-absorbed doses and their ratios. RESULTS: Mean organ doses per unit of administered activity (mGy/MBq) estimated by both methods were 0.33 for liver and 0.33 for lungs by the whole-body method and 1.52 for liver and 1.74 for lungs by the organ-specific method (P=0.0001). The median differences between methods were 0.92 mGy/MBq (range, 0.36-2.2 mGy/MBq) for lungs, 0.82 mGy/MBq (range, 0.28-1.67 mGy/MBq) for liver, and -0.01 mGy/MBq (range, -0.18-0.16 mGy/MBq) for whole body. The median ratios of the treatment activities based on limiting normal-organ dose were 5.12 (range, 2.33-10.01) for lungs, 4.14 (range, 2.16-6.67) for liver, and 0.94 (range, 0.79-1.22) for whole body. We found substantial differences between the dose estimated by the 2 methods for liver and lungs (P=0.0001). CONCLUSION: Dosimetry based on whole-body retention will underestimate the organ doses, and a preferable approach is to evaluate organ-specific doses by accounting for actual radionuclide biodistribution. Myeloablative treatments based on the latter approach allow administration of the maximum amount of radioactivity while minimizing toxicity.     

Evaluation of gadobenate dimeglumine in hepatocellular carcinoma: results from phase II and phase III clinical trials in Japan.

To evaluate the clinical efficacy of gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), we reviewed the results of clinical phase II and III trials in Japan. Gd-BOPTA was administered at a dose of 0.1 mmol/kg to 139 patients who were suspected to have HCC. Dynamic phase images [breath-hold T1-weighted gradient echo (GRE)], spin-echo (SE) images obtained within 10 minutes of injection, and delayed breath-hold GRE images obtained 40-120 minutes after injection were evaluated. All post-contrast images were compared with T1- and T2-weighted pre-contrast images. The contrast efficacy for the dynamic study was classified as ( ) or (++) in 92.1% (128/139), in 43.1% (59/137) with SE within 10 minutes of injection, and in 43.2% (60/139) with breath-hold GRE at delayed phase. The increase in lesion-liver contrast-to-noise ratio was best at the arterial phase of dynamic breath-hold GRE. Liver signal-to-noise ratio showed a mean 52.3% increase in delayed phase. Additional information at delayed phase compared with images acquired within 10 minutes of injection (including the dynamic study) was classified as ( ) or (++) in 28.1% (39/139). With regard to safety, the overall incidence of adverse reactions was 5.0% (7/141) of the patients who were suspected to have HCC, all of whom recovered within 12 hours without any sequelae. No clinically important changes were observed in the blood and urine laboratory tests. It was concluded that Gd-BOPTA was well tolerated and effective in both dynamic study and delayed static imaging for the diagnosis of HCC.     

Safety and efficacy of mangafodipir trisodium (MnDPDP) injection for hepatic MRI in adults: results of the U.S. multicenter phase III clinical trials (safety)

The short-term safety of mangafodipir trisodium (MnDPDP) injection was studied in 546 adults with known or suspected focal liver lesions. An initial contrast-enhanced computed tomography examination was followed by unenhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), injection of MnDPDP (5 micromol/kg), and enhanced MRI. Adverse events were reported for 23% of the patients; most were mild to moderate in intensity, did not require treatment, and were not drug related. The most commonly reported adverse events were nausea (7%) and headache (4%). The incidence of serious adverse events was low (nine events in six patients) and not drug related. Injection-associated discomfort was reported for 69% of the patients, and the most commonly reported discomforts included heat (49%) and flushing (33%). Changes in laboratory values and vital signs were generally transient, were not clinically significant, and did not require treatment. There were no clinically significant short-term risks from exposure to MnDPDP.     

[111In]DOTATOC as a dosimetric substitute for kidney dosimetry during [90Y]DOTATOC therapy: results and evaluation of a combined gamma camera/probe approach

Purpose During [⁹⁰Y]DOTATOC therapy, for determination of kidney doses a conventional approach using co-injected [¹¹¹In]DOTATOC was evaluated for validity, reliability and reproducibility as well as for the influence of methodological variations and bremsstrahlung. Biologically effective doses were estimated by calculating the relative effectiveness (RE) of kidney doses.Methods Fractionated [⁹⁰Y]DOTATOC therapy (n=20 patients, 3.1±0.7 GBq/therapy cycle, 45 therapy cycles) included co-injection of 157±37 MBq [¹¹¹In]DOTATOC and a nephroprotective infusion regimen. From serial gamma camera/probe measurements, individual region of interest (ROI) sets were established and kidney doses were determined according to MIRDOSE3 (corrected for individual kidney mass) by use of three methodological variants: (1) correction for interfering organs (liver/spleen) and background activity, (2) correction for interfering organs alone and (3) no corrections. A phantom study was performed with ¹¹¹ In alone and with ¹¹¹In +⁹⁰Y to estimate the influence of ⁹⁰Y bremsstrahlung.Results Mean kidney dose (method 1, n=20 patients, 20 therapy cycles) was 1.51±0.60 Gy/GBq [⁹⁰Y]DOTATOC (1.41±0.48 Gy/GBq for n=20 patients, 45 therapy cycles). With partial correction (method 2) or no correction (method 3) for interfering activity, kidney doses increased significantly, to 2.71±1.26 Gy/GBq and 3.15±1.22 Gy/GBq, respectively. The span of REs ranged from 1.02 to 1.24. Inter-observer variability was as high as ±32% (±2SD). ⁹⁰Y bremsstrahlung accounted for a 4–11% underestimation of obtained target activity.Conclusion The obtained kidney doses are highly influenced by methodological variations. Full correction for interfering activity clearly underestimates kidney doses. By comparison, ⁹⁰Y bremsstrahlung and variability in the relative effectiveness of kidney doses cause minor bias. Inter-observer variability must be considered when interpreting kidney doses.     

Efficacy and safety of mangafodipir trisodium (MnDPDP) injection for hepatic MRI in adults: results of the U.S. Multicenter phase III clinical trials. Efficacy of early imaging

The efficacy of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for detecting and characterizing, or excluding, hepatic masses was assessed in 404 patients, following the intravenous administration of mangafodipir trisodium (MnDPDP) injection, a hepatic MRI contrast agent. An initial contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) examination was followed by unenhanced MRI, injection of MnDPDP (5 micromol/kg IV), and enhanced MRI at 15 minutes post injection. Agreement of the radiologic diagnoses with the patients' final diagnoses was higher for enhanced MRI and for the combined unenhanced and enhanced MRI evaluations than for unenhanced MRI alone or enhanced CT using the clinical diagnosis as the gold standard. Mangafodipir-enhanced MRI uniquely provided additional diagnostic information in 48% of the patients, and patient management was consequently altered in 6% of the patients. MnDPDP-enhanced MRI was comparable or superior to unenhanced MRI and enhanced CT for the detection, classification, and diagnosis of focal liver lesions in patients with known or suspected focal liver disease.     

Multiple fluid collections: CT- or US-guided aspiration--evaluation of microbiologic results and implications for clinical practice.

PURPOSE: To determine if patients with multiple fluid collections need every collection aspirated and if cross-contamination is a risk if separate sterile procedures are not followed for each aspiration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Records from 1,076 imaging-guided percutaneous aspirations and drainages over 39 months were retrospectively reviewed; 124 patients had multiple fluid collections drained, which yielded 287 aspirates. The patients were divided into two groups: those (n = 82) with multiple collections aspirated on any 1 day, and those (n = 61) with multiple collections aspirated over 10 days. Nineteen patients were included in both groups. Gram stain microscopy and culture results were compared between sequential aspirates in each patient, and their potential effects on antimicrobial therapy and theoretic risk for cross-contamination were evaluated. RESULTS: In 82 patients undergoing multiple aspirations on any 1 day, multiple microorganisms differed in 32 patients, which indicated a need for therapy change in 18 (22%) patients. In 61 patients undergoing aspiration on different days, microorganisms differed in 32 patients, which indicated a need for therapy change in 15 (25%) patients. Cross-contamination could have occurred in 28 of 93 (30%) aspirates from patients with a second or subsequent collection if separate sterile procedures had not been undertaken. CONCLUSION: When multiple fluid collections are identified, aspirates from all collections should be obtained through separate sterile procedures to ensure optimal antimicrobial coverage and avoid cross-contamination.     

The "well tempered" diuretic renogram: a standard method to examine the asymptomatic neonate with hydronephrosis or hydroureteronephrosis. A report from combined meetings of The Society for Fetal Urology and members of The Pediatric Nuclear Medicine Council--The Society of Nuclear Medicine.

Perinatal hydronephrosis (HN) and hydroureteronephrosis (HUN) are recognized more frequently as the routine use of prenatal ultrasonography increases. The decision-making process for those instances of urinary tract dilatation that require surgical correction and those that do not is based in part on the findings of diuresis renography. The methodology for performing this test has differed among nuclear medicine practitioners and the surgical findings are occasionally discrepant from the diuretic renogram interpretation. Consequently, the Society of Fetal Urology (SFU) and the Pediatric Nuclear Medicine Council (PNMC) of the Society of Nuclear Medicine met to develop by consensus a more uniform methodology. A standard method has been agreed upon for the following facets of diuretic renography: patient preparation (hydration and bladder catheterization), diuresis renography technique (radiopharmaceutical used, patient position during examination, data acquisition parameters, diuretic pharmaceutical and dosage, time of injection and regions of interest to monitor diuretic effect), and data analysis (percent differential renal function, curve pattern analysis and methods of measuring diuretic response). Pooled diuresis renogram data are being collected for analysis for correlation with surgical results and clinical outcomes to determine the most appropriate information to be derived from the diuretic renogram in neonates with HN and HUN.