Prolongation of prothrombin time in the presence of rivaroxaban: is this the only cause?

Rivaroxaban is an oral direct Xa inhibitor that can lead to prolongation of prothrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin time. However, these basic coagulation tests are not specific for the anticoagulant effect of rivaroxaban and other confounding factors should be considered while interpreting the test results. We report a case of a patient on rivaroxaban, where underlying factor VII deficiency led to confusion in the interpretation of prothrombin time results and delayed her surgery.     

Arterial antithrombotic activity of rivaroxaban, an orally active factor Xa inhibitor, in a rat electrolytic carotid artery injury model of thrombosis

Rivaroxaban, an oral, direct factor Xa inhibitor, has been approved in several countries for thromboprophylaxis after elective hip or knee arthroplasty based on favorable benefit-risk profile and improved efficacy compared to enoxaparin in reducing the composite of symptomatic and asymptomatic deep vein thrombosis, nonfatal pulmonary embolism, and all-cause mortality. Given the potential therapeutic utility of factor Xa inhibition in arterial thrombosis, we evaluated the antithrombotic activity of rivaroxaban in a model of arterial thrombosis in anesthetized rats in which thrombotic occlusion was induced by electrolytic injury of the carotid artery. Rivaroxaban, 0.3, 1 or 3?mg/kg, enoxaparin, 10?mg/kg, or vehicle were infused intravenously to anesthetized rats and time to occlusion as well as coagulation parameters monitored following carotid electrolytic injury. Although the lowest dose of rivaroxaban (0.3?mg/kg) did not prolong occlusion time compared to vehicle, rivaroxaban at 1 or 3?mg/kg prevented occlusion in all vessels during the 30-min observation period (median occlusion time >30?min), which was greater than that following a single dose of enoxaparin infused at a dose of 10?mg/kg (median time to occlusion = 21.6?min). Rivaroxaban was also effective following oral dosing at 3?mg/kg. Rivaroxaban's antithrombotic activity was paralleled by dose-dependent increases in prothrombin time (PT) and activated clotting time (ACT) without significant changes in activated partial thromboplastin time. Rivaroxaban also markedly increased Russell's viper venom time (RVVT) and decreased thrombin-antithrombin complex concentrations at all doses. These findings support the potential utility of rivaroxaban in arterial thrombotic disorders such as acute coronary syndrome, stroke and peripheral arterial disease.     

Laboratory measurement of the non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants: selecting the optimal assay based on drug,assay availability,and clinical indication

Although the non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) do not require routine monitoring, there are special circumstances in which laboratory measurement may be warranted. The objectives of this review are to summarize evidence on the influence of the NOACs on coagulation tests and provide practical guidance to clinicians on measurement and interpretation of coagulation assays in NOAC-treated patients. Selection of an appropriate assay for NOAC measurement depends on the drug, clinical objective, and assay availability. Separate suggestions for assay selection are provided depending on whether specialized assays are available or whether choice is limited to conventional coagulation assays such as the prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT). The dilute thrombin time (TT) and ecarin-based assays are able to quantify dabigatran across a broad range of concentrations, but are not widely available. A normal TT excludes clinically relevant levels. A normal APTT probably excludes excess levels of dabigatran, but does not rule out typical on-therapy drug concentrations. The PT is insufficiently sensitive to dabigatran to be useful in most situations. Factor Xa inhibitors may be quantified with an anti-Xa assay calibrated with drug-specific standards. A normal PT probably excludes excess levels of rivaroxaban and edoxaban, but not typical on-therapy levels of these agents. The PT is less sensitive to apixaban. Depending on the sensitivity of the thromboplastin reagent, a normal PT may not exclude excess levels of apixaban. The APTT has inadequate sensitivity to factor Xa inhibitors and is not recommended for their measurement.     

Determination of an international sensitivity index of thromboplastin reagents using a WHO thromboplastin as calibrator for plasma spiked with rivaroxaban

Rivaroxaban and other direct factor Xa inhibitors are used at fixed doses without drug monitoring and dose adjustment. Patients may require determination of the anticoagulant effect during treatment. The aim of this study was to develop a method to reduce the differences between thromboplastin reagents and coagulation analysers for determination of the anticoagulant effect of rivaroxaban in human plasma. Purity of rivaroxaban extracted from commercially available drug was confirmed by mass spectrometry, elemental analysis and 1H-NMR spectroscopy. Coagulation times of pooled human plasma spiked with 50-900 ng/ml rivaroxaban were analysed. Thromboplastin reagents, WHO RBT/90, Innovin, RecombiPlasTin 2G, STA Neoplastin Plus, Technoclot PT Plus and Thromborel S, the manual Kolle-Hook method and the KC10 analyser were used. An international sensitivity index (ISI) was determined for each reagent and coagulation method using the RBT/90 thromboplastin reagent as reference. The orthogonal, used for the determination of the ISI of coumarin plasmas, and ordinary regression analyses were compared. The results showed than increasing concentrations of rivaroxaban prolonged coagulation values of all thromboplastin assays linearly (r?(2)=?0.96 and r(2)?=?0.99, respectively). The coefficient of variation between the slopes of the dilution curves and the ratios of the thromboplastin reagents were reduced using the international normalized ratio (INR) and ISI calculated for rivaroxaban. The ISIs of the thromboplastin reagents ranged from 0.73 to 1.67 as compared with the WHO reagent using the manual technique. The coefficient of variations between the thromboplastin reagents comparing the orthogonal and the ordinary regression analysis were 6.8 versus 3.7% (Kolle-Hook method, P?=?0.0011) and 8.5 versus 4.8% (KC10 method, P?相似文献   

Contact factor deficiencies and cardiopulmonary bypass surgery: detection of the defect and monitoring of heparin

Contact factor pathway deficiencies do not cause surgical bleeding but make heparin monitoring by the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and activated clotting time (ACT) unreliable. Heparin monitoring during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) surgery in these patients is particularly challenging. Here we describe heparin monitoring during CPB using the chromogenic anti Xa assay in two patients with severe factor XII deficiency (FXII < 0.01 U/mL) and one patient with severe prekallikrein (PK) deficiency (PK < 0.01 U/mL). Anti Xa levels of the three patients during CPB varied between 3.8 and 4.8 U/mL in keeping with a control group (mean anti Xa 4.5 U/mL and ACT > 480 s). There were no bleeding or thrombotic complications. We also found that detection of severe PK deficiency by the APTT in the PK deficient patient was dependent on the reagent used and discuss the sensitivity of different APTT reagents for contact factor deficiencies. We conclude that the sensitivity of APTT methods for contact pathway deficiencies is highly variable and although insensitivity is not a clinical problem in terms of bleeding, it can be a cause of discrepancy between different APTT reagents and the ACT. This can lead to confusion about a possible haemorrhagic tendency and delays in surgery. If these patients need to undergo cardiac surgery requiring high dose heparin treatment, monitoring by chromogenic anti Xa assay is a good alternative.     

Measurement of dabigatran and rivaroxaban in primary prevention of venous thromboembolism in 106 patients, who have undergone major orthopedic surgery: an observational study

No routine coagulation laboratory test is recommended during rivaroxaban or dabigatran treatment. However measuring drug concentration and/or anticoagulant activity can be desirable in some special clinical settings, such as bleeding, thrombosis recurrence or emergency surgery. The effects of dabigatran etexilate and rivaroxaban on various coagulation assays have been previously studied in normal plasma spiked with increasing concentrations of the drug. In contrast, few data are available in routinely treated patients. In order to perform and to interpret the results of these tests, it is necessary to determine the usual responses of patient’s plasma. We have used several coagulation tests in a prospective study including 106 patients receiving thromboprophylactic treatment with dabigatran 150 or 220 mg od and rivaroxaban 10 mg od for major orthopaedic surgery. The most common tests—prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT)—give results, which vary according to the reagent used. To overcome this limitation, we advocate the use of plasma calibrators, which decreases the inter-laboratory heterogeneity of results. Anti-Xa measurement and Hemoclot, a thrombin diluted clotting assay, are specific assays which have been proposed for rivaroxaban and dabigatran respectively. These tests, conventional PT, aPTT and thrombin generation (TG) have been performed. We demonstrated that measurements of both drugs can determine reliably the drug concentration in patients’ plasmas. PT is more prolonged with rivaroxaban than with dabigatran. Interestingly, the pattern of TG was clearly different in relation to the difference in the mechanism of action of the two new anticoagulants. A significant inter-individual variability of response is detected. Rivaroxaban—mean Cmax 140 ng/mL (extremes 0–412) induces a greater increase of PT than dabigatran. aPTT is sensitive to dabigatran. Rivaroxaban concentrations were in good agreement with two other studies while unexplained lower than expected concentrations were found in dabigatran patients receiving 220 mg once a day [mean Cmax 60 ng/mL (extremes 0–320)]. An interference by pantoprazole, a drug which reduces dabigatran absorption, could explain the observed lower than expected results.     

Active online assessment of patients using new oral anticoagulants: bleeding risk, compliance, and coagulation analysis

Clinicians prescribing new oral anticoagulants (OACs; dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban) should be aware of the exclusion criteria related to bleeding risks defined in published clinical studies. At least a quarter of patients currently using warfarin have an exclusion criterion that may prevent easy transition to the new OACs. In the summary of product characteristics for dabigatran, as an example, the target populations appear generalized. Due to fixed dosing and predictable pharmacology, routine laboratory monitoring of new OACs is deemed unnecessary. Under special circumstances, however, understanding the extent of thrombin or factor (F) Xa inhibition may aid in evaluating compliance and handling emergency interventions, bleeding complications, or overdoses. Although commonly available global coagulation-time assessments (prothrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin time) are insensitive, they may assist clinical management by indicating a severe accumulation of OACs; moreover, a normal thrombin time (TT) excludes a thrombin-inhibitor effect. In particular circumstances, specific assays (diluted TT, Ecarin clotting time, anti-FIIa or anti-FXa activity) may quantify the anticoagulant effect, but therapeutic ranges for dose adjustment are not yet established. Laboratory results are also influenced by clinical situation: e.g. bleed (consumption of coagulation factors) versus postoperative state (activation of coagulation). Without specific antidotes and evidence-based treatment strategies, new OACs are clinically worrisome in patients with impaired renal or liver function. Postmarketing surveillance and recording of bleeding complications (ICD-10 D68.32) are therefore of major importance.     

Inactivation of factor Xa by the synthetic inhibitor DX-9065a causes strong anticoagulant and antiplatelet actions in human blood.

In an in vitro study, anticoagulant and antiplatelet effects of the synthetic, direct factor Xa inhibitor DX-9065a, (+)-2S-2-[4-[[(3S)-1-acetimidoyl-3-pyrrolidinyl]oxy]phenyl]-3-[7-a midino-2-naphthyl]propanoic acid hydrochloride pentahydrate, which shows a high affinity and selectivity towards the enzyme, were investigated. Anticoagulant actions of DX-9065a were studied in human plasma using global clotting assays [prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), thrombin time (TT) and Heptest]. The effect on thrombin generation was measured in whole blood by determining the plasma concentration of prothrombin fragment F1.2. The influence on agonist-induced platelet activation in whole blood was studied using flow cytometric analysis. DX-9065a caused a concentration-dependent prolongation of clotting times in the PT and APTT assay, whereas Heptest was less affected and TT was not influenced. Furthermore, DX-9065a strongly inhibited the generation of thrombin without and after coagulation activation. The factor Xa inhibitor did not affect platelet activation mediated by either thrombin receptor activating peptide, arachidonic acid or y-thrombin, but prevented tissue factor- and factor Xa-induced activation of platelets in a concentration-dependent manner. Inactivation of factor Xa by a highly effective and selective inhibitor, and the resulting inhibition of thrombin generation leads to strong anticoagulant and antiplatelet actions. The interference with the coagulation system at the early level of factor Xa is expected to be an effective approach for a successful anticoagulant/antithrombotic therapy.     

Direct Oral Anticoagulants: New Drugs and New Concepts

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are approved for multiple thromboembolic disorders and provide advantages over existing agents. As with all anticoagulants, management protocols for the eventuality of bleeding are important. Randomized phase III studies generally show that DOACs have a similar risk of clinically relevant bleeding compared with standard anticoagulants, with reductions in major bleeding in some cases. This may be particularly important in patients with atrial fibrillation, for whom the rate of intracranial hemorrhage was approximately halved with DOACs compared with warfarin. Conversely, the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding may be increased. Specific patient characteristics, such as renal impairment, comedications, and particular aspects of each drug, including the proportion eliminated by the kidneys, must be taken into account when assessing the risk of bleeding. Although routine coagulation monitoring of DOACs is not required, it may be useful under some circumstances. Of the traditional clotting assays, a sensitive and calibrated prothrombin time may be useful for detecting the presence or absence of clinically relevant factor Xa inhibitor concentrations (rivaroxaban or apixaban), but specific anti–factor Xa assays can measure drug levels quantitatively. For dabigatran, the results of an activated partial thromboplastin time test may exclude a clinically relevant pharmacodynamic effect, but a calibrated dilute thrombin time assay can be used for quantification of drug levels. In the event of mild or moderate bleeding, normal hemostatic support measures are recommended. For life-threatening bleeding, use of nonspecific prohemostatic agents may be considered, although clinical evidence is scarce. Specific antidotes are in development.     

Determination of antithrombin-dependent factor Xa inhibitors by prothrombin-induced clotting time

Prothrombinase-induced clotting time (PiCT) determines the anticoagulant effects of heparins, low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs), and direct thrombin inhibitors. At present, this is the only method that measures the effects of all of these inhibitors, in contrast to the prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), Heptest, ecarin clotting time, and the chromogenic assays. The antithrombin-dependent direct factor (F) Xa inhibitors fondaparinux and idraparinux were compared with the LMWH dalteparin on PiCT, aPTT, Heptest, and chromogenic anti-FXa assays in pooled human normal plasma samples. Fondaparinux and idraparinux prolonged the coagulation times in the PiCT, Heptest, and chromogenic FXa assays in a dose-dependent manner, in contrast to the aPTT. We conclude that PiCT is a suitable assay to determine the anticoagulant effects of these two new FXa inhibitors in patients receiving treatment with these compounds.     

Test of the month: The chromogenic antifactor Xa assay

As the number of anticoagulant drugs increases and new ones are brought to market, the utility of the routine screening coagulation tests of today—namely the prothrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin time—will be significantly reduced in many clinical situations. Although the new anticoagulants are designed to require less frequent monitoring, it is imperative that the proper test is selected in situations where monitoring is needed. In addition, tests that are designed for the new generation of drugs may be informative in certain situations for monitoring the anticoagulants that have been in use for many years. Here, we present the chromogenic antifactor Xa assay and demonstrate its utility and its limitations in monitoring three anticoagulant drugs (unfractionated heparin, low molecular weight heparin, and fondaparinux) as well as one emerging anticoagulant, rivaroxaban. Am. J. Hematol. 2011. © 2011 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Monitoring heparin anticoagulation in the acute phase response

The anticoagulant effect of unfractionated heparin (UFH) is monitored using the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT). An APTT of 1·5–2·5 times the control is usually taken as the therapeutic range and assumed to reflect an anti‐activated factor X (anti‐Xa) level of 0·35–0·7 u/ml. However, in some cases, despite administration of sufficient heparin to achieve a therapeutic anti‐Xa assay level, the APTT remains sub‐therapeutic. This ‘apparent heparin resistance’ is commonly due to high levels of factor VIII (FVIII). In these situations, the anti‐Xa is usually preferred for monitoring in order to avoid, what might be, dangerously high levels of heparin. We hypothesized that at high FVIII levels, the heparin resistance encountered may be genuine rather than apparent and that higher doses of heparin may indeed be needed for an equivalent anticoagulant effect. The relationship between heparin level, APTT and anticoagulant effect at different FVIII concentrations was determined using thrombelastography and the thrombin generation assay. Thromboelastographic and thrombin generation parameters concurred with APTT, demonstrating a genuine heparin resistance in the presence of high FVIII levels. This suggests that APTT may be a more accurate measure of anticoagulant effect in vivo than anti‐Xa.     

Urgent monitoring of direct oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation: a tentative approach based on routine laboratory tests

The number of patients diagnosed with atrial fibrillation who will be candidates for antithrombotic therapy with direct oral anticoagulants (i.e., dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban) is exponentially arising worldwide, thus posing substantial economic and organizational challenges for their urgent monitoring. Due to long turnaround time and inherent technical complexity, liquid chromatography techniques are unsuitable for rapid assessment of their concentration. Even the use of surrogate tests such as thrombin clotting time or anti-factor Xa activity carries some economic and technical drawbacks. Based on literature data, we have hence developed an algorithm based on first-line tests for urgent screening of the anticoagulant effect of direct oral anticoagulants, which entails activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) for dabigatran and prothrombin time (PT) for rivaroxaban. Although these tests also display a concentration-dependent prolongation in patients taking apixaban and edoxaban, neither of them is sufficiently sensitive for providing accurate estimation of the pharmacodynamic effect, so that the measurement of anti-factor Xa activity remains the most suitable approach in patients taking these drugs. According to literature data, this strategy appears suitable to reliably define the thrombotic or bleeding risk in an urgent setting, contextually saving precious laboratory resources.     

Alteration in the laboratory profile of a lupus anticoagulant in a patient with non‐Hodgkin's lymphoma

We describe a patient with non‐Hodgkin's lymphoma who developed a lupus anticoagulant (LA) detectable by activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), dilute Russell's viper venom time (DRVVT) and kaolin clotting time (KCT). IgM anticardiolipin antibodies (ACA) were elevated. At a later admission, and following treatment for the lymphoma, routine coagulation screening showed an elevated prothrombin time (PT) without correction in mixing tests using a recombinant thromboplastin. Routine APTT was below the reference range and ACA levels were normal. Raw data for one‐stage factor assays demonstrated the presence of an inhibitor. Analysis for LA was undertaken by DRVVT, KCT, activated seven lupus anticoagulant assay, Taipan snake venom time, platelet neutralisation procedures (PNP), Ecarin time and PT using rabbit brain thromboplastin. The results revealed a LA capable of prolonging the clotting times of the PNPs and PT using recombinant thromboplastin, but that was corrected using Ecarin venom, modified PNP and brain thromboplastin. The antibody also demonstrated the lupus anticoagulant co‐factor effect. The factor VIII : C was markedly raised which may have masked the LA in the APTT. The changing laboratory profile over time demonstrates the effects of LA heterogeneity and variations in sensitivity and specificity of assays for the detection of antiphospholipid antibodies.     

Alteration in the laboratory profile of a lupus anticoagulant in a patient with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

We describe a patient with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma who developed a lupus anticoagulant (LA) detectable by activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), dilute Russell's viper venom time (DRVVT) and kaolin clotting time (KCT). IgM anticardiolipin antibodies (ACA) were elevated. At a later admission, and following treatment for the lymphoma, routine coagulation screening showed an elevated prothrombin time (PT) without correction in mixing tests using a recombinant thromboplastin. Routine APTT was below the reference range and ACA levels were normal. Raw data for one-stage factor assays demonstrated the presence of an inhibitor. Analysis for LA was undertaken by DRVVT, KCT, activated seven lupus anticoagulant assay, Taipan snake venom time, platelet neutralisation procedures (PNP), Ecarin time and PT using rabbit brain thromboplastin. The results revealed a LA capable of prolonging the clotting times of the PNPs and PT using recombinant thromboplastin, but that was corrected using Ecarin venom, modified PNP and brain thromboplastin. The antibody also demonstrated the lupus anticoagulant co-factor effect. The factor VIII: C was markedly raised which may have masked the LA in the APTT. The changing laboratory profile over time demonstrates the effects of LA heterogeneity and variations in sensitivity and specificity of assays for the detection of antiphospholipid antibodies.     

Familial thrombophilia due to a previously unrecognized mechanism characterized by poor anticoagulant response to activated protein C: prediction of a cofactor to activated protein C.

Although patients with thromboembolic disease frequently have family histories of thrombosis, well-defined defects such as inherited deficiencies of anticoagulant proteins are found only in a minority of cases. Based on the hypothesis that a poor anticoagulant response to activated protein C (APC) would predispose to thrombosis, a set of new coagulation assays was developed that measure the anticoagulant response in plasma to APC. A middle-aged man with a history of multiple thrombotic events was identified. The addition of APC to his plasma did not result in a normal anticoagulant response as measured by prolongation of clotting time in an activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) assay. Four of the proband's relatives had medical histories of multiple thrombotic events, and they and several other family members responded poorly to APC in the APTT-based assay. Subnormal anticoagulant responses to APC were also found in factor IXa- and Xa-based assays. Several possible mechanisms for the observed phenomenon were ruled out, such as functional protein S deficiency, a protein C-inhibitory antibody, or a fast-acting protease inhibitor against APC. Moreover, restriction fragment-length polymorphism analysis excluded possible linkage of the underlying molecular defect to factor VIII and von Willebrand factor genes. We now describe a previously unrecognized mechanism for familial thromboembolic disease that is characterized by poor anticoagulant response to APC. This would appear to be explained best by a hypothesized inherited deficiency of a previously unrecognized cofactor to APC. As we have identified two additional, unrelated cases with thrombosis and inherited poor anticoagulant response to APC, this may constitute an important cause for familial thrombophilia.     

The investigation of a prolonged APTT with specific clotting factor assays is unnecessary if an APTT with Actin FS is normal

Introduction: An isolated prolongation to the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) can be caused by the presence of the lupus anticoagulant or an intrinsic or contact factor deficiency, of which only deficiencies of factors VIII, IX or XI are associated with bleeding. Our local protocol states that further investigation of a prolonged APTT by specific assays of FVIII, FIX and FXI should only be undertaken where the APTT with one reagent (Synthasil) is more than 3 s prolonged, and further investigation by an APTT with a second reagent (Actin FS) is also prolonged, unless there is a history of bleeding in the patient, in which case assays are indicated irrespective of the APTT. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the results of all APTTs performed over a 36 ‐month period to evaluate whether strictly applying our protocol would reduce the number of unnecessary clotting factor assays performed, without leaving patients with potentially significant bleeding disorders undiagnosed. Results: Of a total number of 587 samples tested for coagulation factors VIII, IX and XI, only 117 samples yielded an abnormal result. Thus, 80% of all the assays requested in the 3 ‐year period audited gave a result within the reference range for factors VIII, FIX and XI. Three quarters of the abnormal results revealed mild FXI deficiency. Conclusion: This review has demonstrated that no significant coagulation factor deficiency would be left undiagnosed if the protocol was followed. This would have considerably reduced the cost and time spent performing these assays.     

Kinetics of intravenously administered heparin in normal humans

Heparin of five commercially available brands was used to study the disappearance of heparin anticoagulant activity in normal humans. The drug was administered intravenously by bolus injection and by continuous infusion. Heparin anticoagulant activity was determined by two assays: a diluted activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and an assay based on inactivation of bovine factor Xa, using a clotting system. After a bolus injection, the data fitted neither single exponential nor zero-order clearance. In semilogarithmic plots, heparin anticoagulant activity disappeared according to a slightly convex curve almost always preceded by a rapid initial loss of heparin anticoagulant activity. This disappearance profile was observed with all heparin regardless of the brand or assay system. Heparin anticoagulant activity estimated by the APTT disappeared faster than heparin anticoagulant activity estimated by the anti-Xa activity in the first phase. As expected, higher anticoagulant levels with the anti-Xa assay than with the APTT were also found on continuous infusion in normals as well as in patients treated for deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism. The experimental data suggested a model based on the combination of a saturable and a linear clearance mechanism. These experimental data provide reliable guidelines for adjustment of the dose of heparin in single patients.     

The varied sensitivity of partial thromboplastin and prothrombin time reagents in the demonstration of the lupus-like anticoagulant.

An acquired inhibitor of blood coagulation, similar to that described in patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE), was detected during routine coagulation screening in 10 patients who did not meet the criteria for a diagnosis of SLE. The lupus-like anticoagulant (LLAC) was diagnosed on the basis of prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and/or prothrombin time (PT) which failed to correct when patient plasma was added to normal plasma; an additional criterion was an abnormal tissue thromboplastin inhibition test. No patient had a specific inhibitor directed against factors VIII and IX. Demonstration of LLAC was highly dependent upon the type of reagents adopted in the APTT and PT: the abnormality was detected consistently by one reagent only. One-stage assays of factors VIII and IX were characteristic of the presence of an inhibitor, showing non-parellel dose-response curves or decreased activity at low dilutions which were partially corrected at higher dilutions. Although 7 patients were free of abnormal bleeding, unequivocal signs of haemorrhagic tendency after a surgery were present in the remaining 3 patients. The findings suggest that LLAC is a non-exceptional cause of prolonged coagulation screening tests, and that it may sometimes be associated with impaired haemostasis.     

The Varied Sensitivity of Partial Thromboplastin and Prothrombin Time Reagents in the Demonstration of the Lupus-Like Anticoagulant

An acquired inhibitor of blood coagulation, similar to that described in patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE), was detected during routine coagulation screening in 10 patients who did not meet the criteria for a diagnosis of SLE. The lupus-like anticoagulant (LLAC) was diagnosed on the basis of prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and/or prothrombin time (PT) which failed to correct when patient plasma was added to normal plasma; an additional criterion was an abnormal tissue thromboplastin inhibition test. No patient had a specific inhibitor directed against factors VIII and IX. Demonstration of LLAC was highly dependent upon the type of reagents adopted in the APTT and PT: the abnormality was detected consistently by one reagent only. One-stage assays of factors VIII and IX were characteristic of the presence of an inhibitor, showing non-parellel dose-response curves or decreased activity at low dilutions which were partially corrected at higher dilutions. Although 7 patients were free of abnormal bleeding, unequivocal signs of haemorrhagic tendency after a surgery were present in the remaining 3 patients. The findings suggest that LLAC is a non-exceptional cause of prolonged coagulation screening tests, and that it may sometimes be associated with impaired haemostasis.