A laboratory-based study to assess the performance of surgical gloves

The inherent tear resistance and elasticity of latex and the touch sensitivity it provides has made it the traditional material of choice for surgical gloves, protecting both health care workers and patients from the transmission of bloodborne infections. Although increased incidence of latex allergy has led to increased use of nonlatex surgical gloves, the effectiveness of these gloves as a barrier to infection has not been examined thoroughly. This laboratory-based study compared the performance of latex and nonlatex surgical gloves in a simulated stress protocol. The propensity of surgical gloves to fail was dependent on glove material, manufacturer, and stress. Nonlatex neoprene and nitrile gloves were comparable to latex and can provide a good alternative to latex for allergic patients and health care workers. In this study, isoprene was found to be inferior to latex and other nonlatex materials. The presence or absence of glove powder had no significant influence on the probability of glove failure. AORN J 71 (April 2003) 772-779.     

Latex glove disorders: a management strategy for reducing skin sensitivity

The use of latex gloves by health care workers has increased over recent years. Proteins within the latex gloves and chemical additives during the manufacturing process have been linked to allergic skin and systemic disorders. Evidence suggests that latex-related skin disorders are increasing. Unless more stringent measures to control prolonged contact with latex gloves are implemented, skin disorders will continue to increase. While employees have a professional responsibility to reduce longer contact with latex gloves and use other safer alternatives, employers may also contribute through better education provisions, more strict monitoring and control of glove usage and purchasing gloves that are safer. An Infection Control Nurse can support both employees and management by developing and supporting better education and guidance for glove usage and an Employee Health Nurse could provide better care and support to affected workers. Glove manufacturers should identify the level of each protein in their gloves, the health risks involved and undertake new research to produce more hypoallergenic gloves. Collaborative efforts among employees, employers, researchers and glove manufacturers are needed to prevent the spiraling latex health risks to health care workers getting worse.     

Considerations in the selection of surgical gloves for tape wound closure

One of the reasons that tape closure of wounds is rarely used in the emergency department is that it is difficult for the emergency physician wearing powdered, latex gloves to handle skin closure tapes. Because the skin closure tapes adhere aggressively to powdered latex gloves, it is difficult for the emergency physician to separate the tape from his glove and apply the tape to the skin. The advent of a new powder free glove allows the emergency physician to handle the tapes and accomplish tape wound closure.     

Will medical examination gloves protect rescuers from defibrillation voltages during hands-on defibrillation?

Background

Continuing compressions during a defibrillation shock has been proposed as a method of reducing pauses in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) but the safety of this procedure is unproven. The medical examination gloves worn by rescuers play an important role in protecting the rescuer yet the electrical characteristics of these gloves are unknown. This study examined the response of medical examination gloves to defibrillation voltages.

Methods

Part 1 of this study measured voltage–current curves for a small sample (8) of gloves. Part 2 tested more gloves (460) to determine the voltage required to produce a specific amount of current flow. Gloves were tested at two current levels: 0.1 mA and 10 mA. Testing included four glove materials (chloroprene, latex, nitrile, and vinyl) in a single layer and double-gloved.

Results

All gloves tested in part 1 allowed little current to flow (<1 mA) as the voltage was increased until breakdown occurred, at which point current flow increased precipitously. In part 2, 118 of 260 (45%) single gloves and 93 of 120 (77%) double gloves allowed at least 0.1 mA of current flow at voltages within the external defibrillation voltage range. Also, 6 of 80 (7.5%) single gloves and 5 of 80 (6.2%) double gloves allowed over 10 mA.

Conclusions

Few of the gloves tested limited the current to levels proven to be safe. A lack of sensation during hands-on defibrillation does not guarantee that a safety margin exists. As such, we encourage rescuers to minimize rather than eliminate the pause in compressions for defibrillation.     

The implications of latex allergy in healthcare settings

? Latex allergy is on the increase. ? This paper focuses on how sensitization can occur and the use of latex gloves. ? Implications for the healthcare setting are addressed and recommendations made focusing on glove usage.     

Avoiding problems: evidence-based selection of medical gloves

Allergenic contact reaction to glove proteins and residual chemicals increased from 1980 onwards; circumstantial and technical evidence indicates that change from reusable to disposable latex gloves was a causative factor. Several protein fractions are potentially allergenic; if low protein gloves contain a dominant protein fraction, people with sensitivity may still have an adverse reaction. Use of chlorinated powder-free gloves reduces risk of allergenic reaction; other powder-free gloves may still pose a contact risk to patients. Adverse comparative tests of vinyl vs latex medical gloves may, in some cases, have used non-medical gloves without assessment of initial quality or involved an unrealistic test method; these have discouraged use of a non-allergenic alternative to latex gloves. Vinyl medical glove properties are reviewed. Nitrile examination gloves offer better protection than latex types when handling lipid-soluble substances and chemicals. Properties of medical gloves made from other materials are described.     

Anatomy of a defective barrier: sequential glove leak detection in a surgical and dental environment.

OBJECTIVES: a) To determine the frequency of perforations in latex surgical gloves before, during, and after surgical and dental procedures; b) to evaluate the topographical distribution of perforations in latex surgical gloves after surgical and dental procedures; and c) to validate methods of testing for latex surgical glove patency. DESIGN: Multitrial tests under in vitro conditions and a prospective sequential patient study using consecutive testing. SETTING: An outpatient dental clinic at a university dental school, the operating suite in a medical school affiliated with the Veteran's Hospital, and a biomechanics laboratory. PERSONNEL: Surgeons, scrub nurses, and dental technicians participating in 50 surgical and 50 dental procedures. METHODS: We collected 679 latex surgical gloves after surgical procedures and tested them for patency by using a water pressure test. We also employed an electronic glove leak detector before donning, after sequential time intervals, and upon termination of 47 surgical (sequential surgical), 50 dental (sequential dental), and in three orthopedic cases where double gloving was used. The electronic glove leak detector was validated by using electronic point-by-point surface probing, fluorescein dye diffusion, as well as detecting glove punctures made with a 27-gauge needle. RESULTS: The random study indicated a leak rate of 33.0% (224 out of 679) in latex surgical gloves; the sequential surgical study demonstrated patency in 203 out of 347 gloves (58.5%); the sequential dental study showed 34 leaks in the 106 gloves used (32.1%); and with double gloving, the leak rate decreased to 25.0% (13 of 52 gloves tested). While the allowable FDA defect rate for unused latex surgical gloves is 1.5%, we noted defect rates in unused gloves of 5.5% in the sequential surgical, 1.9% in the sequential dental, and 4.0% in our electronic glove leak detector validating study. In the sequential surgical study, 52% of the leaks had occurred by 75 mins, and in the sequential dental study, 75% of the leaks developed by 30 mins. In terms of the anatomical localization, the thumb and forefinger accounted for more than 60% of the defects. There were no differences in the frequency of glove leaks between the left and right hand. Leak rates were highest for the surgeon (52%), followed by the first assistant (29%) and the scrub nurse (25%). No false negatives were noted using the electronic glove leak detector; one false positive was seen out of 225 gloves tested (0.44%), as noted in our validation studies. CONCLUSIONS: Significantly high glove leak rates were noted after surgical and dental procedures, indicating that the present day latex surgical gloves can become an incompetent barrier once they are used. Unused latex surgical gloves demonstrated a higher rate of defects than allowed by the Food and Drug Administration standards, indicating substantial noncompliance of quality control standards by manufacturers as well as inadequate governmental oversight. Double gloving, or the use of thicker latex surgical gloves, would probably reduce the frequency of glove leaks. Latex surgical gloves should be tested for patency before use and during surgical and dental procedures.     

A global inventory of hospitals using powder-free gloves: a search for principled medical leadership

Scientific experimental and clinical studies have demonstrated that cornstarch on surgical and examination gloves promotes disease by acting as a reactive foreign body in tissue and serving as a vector for latex allergy. Consequently, hospitals have selected an innovative glove selection program utilizing only powder-free gloves. Healthcare workers in emergency medical systems are now wearing powder-free, latex-free gloves to care for the growing number of patients sensitized to latex. A global Internet search has now identified 70 hospitals in the United States and three hospitals in Europe that use only powder-free gloves.     

断指再植手术中定时更换外科手套的效果研究

目的探讨断指再植手术中每2.5h更换外科手套的效果,为临床护理提供依据。方法选择2014年4-12月我院收治的断指再植手术110例患者,随机分为对照组58例,观察组52例,其中,观察组采取每2.5h更换手套的干预措施,比较两组手术中手套破损情况。结果对照组55%的手术出现手套破损,观察组26.9%的手术出现手套破损,差异有统计学意义(P0.05);观察组手套破损率为3%,对照组手套破损率为10%,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论断指再植手术中每2.5h更换外科手套能明显降低手术中手套破损。     

Do clinical examination gloves provide adequate electrical insulation for safe hands-on defibrillation? II: Material integrity following exposure to defibrillation waveforms

Introduction

Maintaining contact with the patient during defibrillator discharge has been proposed as a method for reducing no flow time but carries an associated risk of electrocution of the rescuer. This study describes an investigation to determine if typical clinical examination gloves possess the dielectric strength needed to prevent breakdown at defibrillation voltages; a factor essential to protect the rescuer.

Methods

Four types of examination glove typically used in a clinical environment were tested with two types of defibrillation waveform commonly used. For each type of glove, 10 samples were tested initially using a monophasic defibrillation waveform and then, using a fresh sample of gloves, with a Biphasic waveform. For each glove the number of shocks required before electrical breakdown occurred was recorded.

Results

Kimberly Clark KC300 (nitrile), Kimberly Clark KC500 purple (nitrile), PH Medisavers GN90 (nitrile) and Bodyguards GL6622 (Vinyl) were tested using a monophasic defibrillation waveform and broke down after a median of 1, 4.5, 1 and 1 shocks respectively. The equivalent values for Biphasic defibrillator were 2, >10, 2.5 and 1 shocks.

Discussion

Typical clinical examination gloves do not possess the dielectric strength required to protect a rescuer from defibrillation voltages during hands-on chest compressions.     

Inadequate Standard for Glove Puncture Resistance: Allows Production of Gloves with Limited Puncture Resistance

The National Fire Protection Association has developed standards for glove puncture resistance using a metal puncture probe. Biomechanical performance studies have demonstrated that glove puncture resistance to the probe is significantly greater than that of the hypodermic needle, suggesting that these standards have no clinical relevance. These standards give a false sense of security to health care personnel and sanction the production and use of gloves that give inadequate protection. The result is potentially harmful for medical personnel.     

Do clinical examination gloves provide adequate electrical insulation for safe hands-on defibrillation? I: Resistive properties of nitrile gloves

Introduction

Uninterrupted chest compressions are a key factor in determining resuscitation success. Interruptions to chest compression are often associated with defibrillation, particularly the need to stand clear from the patient during defibrillation. It has been suggested that clinical examination gloves may provide adequate electrical resistance to enable safe hands-on defibrillation in order to minimise interruptions. We therefore examined whether commonly used nitrile clinical examination gloves provide adequate resistance to current flow to enable safe hands-on defibrillation.

Methods

Clinical examination gloves (Kimberly Clark KC300 Sterling nitrile) worn by members of hospital cardiac arrest teams were collected immediately following termination of resuscitation. To determine the level of protection afforded by visually intact gloves, electrical resistance across the glove was measured by applying a DC voltage across the glove and measuring subsequent resistance.

Results

Forty new unused gloves (control) were compared with 28 clinical (non-CPR) gloves and 128 clinical (CPR) gloves. One glove in each group had a visible tear and was excluded from analysis. Control gloves had a minimum resistance of 120 kΩ (median 190 kΩ) compared with 60 kΩ in clinical gloves (both CPR (median 140 kΩ) and non-CPR groups (median 160 kΩ)).

Discussion

Nitrile clinical examination gloves do not provide adequate electrical insulation for the rescuer to safely undertake ‘hands-on’ defibrillation and when exposed to the physical forces of external chest compression, even greater resistive degradation occurs. Further work is required to identify gloves suitable for safe use for ‘hands-on’ defibrillation.     

Surgical glove perforation among nurses in ophthalmic surgery: A case‐control study

Many of the ophthalmic surgical instruments are extremely fine and sharp. Due to the dim light environment required for ophthalmic surgical procedures, the passing of sharp instruments among surgeons and scrub nurses also poses a risk for glove perforations. A case‐control study was performed to determine the number and site of perforations in the surgical gloves used by a group of scrub nurses during ophthalmic surgery. All six nurses working in an eye and refractive surgery centre in Hong Kong participated in the study. A total of 100 (50 pairs) used surgical gloves were collected following 50 ophthalmic surgeries. Fifty pairs of new surgical gloves were also collected. Every collected surgical glove underwent the water leak test. The surgical procedure perforation rate was 8%, and none of the perforations were detected by the scrub nurses. No perforations were found in any unused gloves. The findings indicate that glove perforations for scrub nurses during ophthalmic surgery do occur and mostly go unnoticed. Future studies should continue to explore factors contributing to surgical glove perforation.     

Disposable non-sterile gloves: a policy for appropriate usage

Since the implementation of universal precautions, the use of disposable gloves has become part of everyday clinical practice. Guidance has been published to advise healthcare workers of the risks of latex allergies associated with the wearing of powdered latex gloves. The literature supports the use of gloves when contact with blood or body fluids is likely. However, an audit of glove usage indicated that practitioners were wearing gloves inappropriately, i.e. to wash patients (20%). The results of this study also demonstrated that a small percentage of staff (20%) were wearing vinyl gloves to deal with blood spillages and for venepuncture (13%) and cannulation (10%). A glove policy and a flow chart to assist staff in the selection of gloves were introduced. An educational programme for all hospital staff was commenced. These measures can assist healthcare workers in making an informed choice regarding glove usage.     

Prevalence of adverse reactions to latex gloves in Korean operating room nurses

This study was conducted to determine the prevalence rate of adverse reactions to latex gloves. Among hospital personnel working in operating rooms, 41.4% reported adverse reactions to latex. Especially among OR nurses, the prevalence rate of adverse reactions was 80.3%, and that of latex allergy was 9.8%. Common symptoms were rash, skin itching, dizziness, and eye itching. Atopics had more latex allergy than the non-atopics. There was no difference in the incidence rate of latex allergy among the five gloves by the prick test. But with the exposure test, ordinary gloves had a higher latex allergy incidence than hypoallergenic gloves.     

Latex allergy: are you at risk?

The prevalence of latex allergies in healthcare workers has significantly increased over the past 2 decades. Increases in exposure to latex products in healthcare environments are related primarily to the use of gloves for barrier protection. In the early 1980s, with the implementation of universal precautions and appropriate healthcare worker protection, latex glove use dramatically rose in many countries. Manufacturing techniques and additional factories for latex gloves were developed to meet the tremendous demand. As a result of new "fast-track" production processes, some of the latex gloves had variant amounts of powder and allergen content. Synthetic materials, such as polyvinyl, polyurethanes, nitrile, and neoprene, are being used to manufacture medical gloves. Some hospitals and clinics have adopted the use of these alternatives to provide a "latex-free" healthcare environment. Risk reduction and prevention strategies are being implemented in many countries. Latex sensitivity and allergy can present as variable clinical reactions including contact dermatitis, rhinoconjuctivitis, asthma, and anaphylaxis. Some healthcare providers who have coexisting risk factors, such as atopy and food allergies (chestnuts, bananas, avocados, passion fruit, celery, potatoes, and peaches), are at an even greater risk for severe allergic reactions following repeated latex exposure. This journal course will provide an overview of the information available related to latex allergy in healthcare workers.     

Citizen's Petition to Food and Drug Administration to ban cornstarch powder on medical gloves: Maltese cross birefringence

Background

During the last 25 years, scientific experimental and clinical studies have documented the dangers of cornstarch powder on examination and surgical gloves because the cornstarch promotes wound infection, causes serious peritoneal adhesions and granulomatous peritonitis, and is a well-documented vector of the latex allergy epidemic in the world. Realizing the dangers of cornstarch on examination and surgical gloves, Germany's regulations of personal protective equipment banned the use of surgical glove powder cornstarch in 1997. In 2000, the Purchasing and Supply agency for the United Kingdom ceased to purchase any gloves lubricated with cornstarch.

Discussion

Realizing the dangers of cornstarch-powdered gloves, many hospitals and clinics in the United States have banned the use of cornstarch-powdered examination and surgical gloves. Hospitals that have banned cornstarch in their examination and surgical gloves have noted a marked reduction in the latex allergy epidemic in their facilities. Realizing the dangers of cornstarch-powdered examination and surgical gloves, Dr Sheila A. Murphey, branch chief, Infection Control Devices Branch, Division of Anesthesiology, General Hospital, Infection Control, and Dental Devices Office of Device Evaluation, Center for Devices and Radiological Health of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), recommended that a Citizen's Petition be filed to the FDA to ban cornstarch on surgical and examination gloves.

Conclusion

The 12 authors of this report have attached the enclosed petition to the FDA to ban the use of cornstarch on all synthetic and latex examination and surgical gloves used in the United States.     

Medical gloves and glove materials

Latex gloves are widely used in health care, but latex allergy is increasingly becoming a problem. Nurses should be aware of the alternatives to latex gloves and when these can be used. Nurses should know their organisation's policy on glove use and latex allergy.     

连续采血手套表面污染后消毒效果及成本分析

目的评价在连续大量采血过程中不换手套采用手套消毒的消毒效果及时间、成本的比较。方法从门诊患者中随机选择59例,在连续采血过程中不换手套。每次采血前用1mL 3M免洗手消毒液（含葡萄糖酸氯已定0.45%~0.55%w/v,乙醇水平63.1%~77.0%v/v）采用六步洗手法的方式进行手套手消毒,再进行消毒效果细菌学监测及时间、成本的比较。结果在59例标本中,细菌菌落总数均小于或等于10CFU/cm2,未检出金黄色葡萄球菌、大肠杆菌等致病菌。59例患者仅使用了一双手套和59mL消毒液,总价为6.33元。而全部更换59双手套则需要129.80元。因此,节约了123.47元的成本。如每次换手套和手消毒的时间为1min 20s,59例标本则可以减少49min。结论在采血后,用快速消毒液采用六步洗手法消毒不仅能有效替代在每个患者采血后更换手套和做手消毒,还能节约时间和成本。     

Biogel Skinsense N: surgical glove management for latex allergies

Healthcare staff with a high occupational exposure to latex gloves, such as those who work in the operating theatre, have a higher than average incidence of latex allergies. Certain patient groups are also known to be considered "high risk" for latex allergies. When wearing gloves, staff allergic to latex and those working with patients allergic to latex must wear latex-free gloves to protect themselves and their patients. Of all the different types of gloves available--examination, medical or diagnostic--surgical gloves have to meet the highest standards, offering both protection and comfort. However, latex-free surgical gloves have previously lacked some of the "comfort" qualities of natural latex. This article describes appropriate glove management for latex allergies and looks at the new generation of latex-free surgical gloves.