Use of oral contraceptives and breast cancer risk: The Norwegian-Swedish Women's Lifestyle and Health Cohort Study.

Current use of oral contraceptives (OCs) has been reported to increase breast cancer risk slightly. In 1991/1992, a prospective cohort study specifically designed to examine the role of hormonal contraceptives in relation to breast cancer was conducted in Norway and Sweden. This study was entitled Women's Lifestyle and Health. Of 196,000 invited women aged 30-49 years, 106,844 women answered a 4-page questionnaire. Altogether, 103,027 women providing information on contraceptive use were included in the analysis presented here, and 1,008 primary invasive breast cancers were diagnosed throughout 1999 (end of follow-up). Proportional hazard regression was used to calculate relative risks (RRs) with adjustment for age and other possible confounders. An increased breast cancer risk was observed among women who were current/recent users of OCs of any type at the start of follow-up [RR, 1.6; 96% confidence interval (CI), 1.2-2.1]. Current/recent use (i.e., use in the year preceding cohort enrolment) of combined OCs (RR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.0-2.0) and progestin-only pills (RR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.0-2.4) entailed similar levels of increased risk. An increased risk of borderline significance was found among short-term (i.e., less than 13 months) users before age 20 years (RR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.0-1.7) and before first full-term pregnancy (RR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.0-1.8). Long-term users of OCs were at a higher risk of breast cancer than never users (test for trend, P = 0.005). Current/recent use of OCs is associated with an increased breast cancer risk. Use of combined OCs and progestin-only pills seem to increase the risk at the same level.     

Hormone replacement therapy and breast cancer in former users of oral contraceptives--The Norwegian Women and Cancer study

Combined estrogen-progestin menopausal therapy (HRT) and combined estrogen-progestin contraceptives (OC) both increase breast cancer risk during current use and a few years after. We investigated risk of breast cancer in women who were users of HRT dependant on former history of OC use in a large, national population-based cohort study, the Norwegian Women and Cancer study (NOWAC). Exposure information was collected through postal questionnaires. Based on follow-up of 30,118 postmenopausal women by linkage to national registers of cancer, deaths, and emigration we revealed 540 incident breast cancer cases between 1996 and 2004. Compared to never users of either drugs current use of HRT gave a significant (p = 0.002) higher risk of breast cancer in former OC users, RR = 2.45 (95% CI 1.92-3.12), than among never users of OCs, RR = 1.67 (1.32-2.12). Relative risk of current use of HRT was similar for estrogen only and combinations with progestin added in ever users of OCs. The increased risk of breast cancer in current HRT users with a history of former OC use could have potential great impact on postmenopausal breast cancer risk as the proportion of postmenopausal women with former OC use will continue to increase.     

Oral contraceptive use and risk of breast cancer in older women (New Zealand)

the effect of oral contraceptive (OC) use at older ages on the risk of breast cancer was examined in a national population-based case-control study conducted in New Zealand. A total of 891 women aged 25 to 54 years with a first diagnosis of breast cancer, and 1,864 control subjects, randomly selected from the electoral rolls, were interviewed. The relative risk (RR) of breast cancer for women aged 45 to 54 years at diagnosis who had ever used OCs was 1.0 (95 percent confidence interval [CI]=0.77–1.3). There was no significant increase in risk of breast cancer among recent users of OCs of any age. Analyses according to age at first and last use among women aged 40 years and older at diagnosis showed no group with an elevated risk of breast cancer. Women who had used OCs for 10 years or longer after age 40 had an apparent increase in risk (RR=2.7, CI=0.97–7.5), but the trend in risk with duration of use was not significant. These findings suggest that OC use in older women does not affect their risk of breast cancer appreciably, but it is not possible to rule out a modest increase in risk with such use.This research was supported by grants from the Medical Research Council of New Zealand and from the Special Programme of Research, Development, and Research Training in Human Reproduction, World Health Organization.     

Exogenous hormone use and the risk of postmenopausal breast cancer: results from the Netherlands Cohort Study

The association between the use of exogenous hormones as either oral contraceptives (OC) or hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in relation to postmenopausal breast cancer incidence was examined in the Netherlands Cohort Study (NLCS) among 62,573 women aged 55 to 69 years. Information on these types of exogenous hormone use and other risk factors was collected by mailed questionnaire. During 3.3 years of follow-up, 471 incident breast cancer cases were identified. After adjustment for traditional breast cancer risk factors, the relative risk (RR) of breast cancer was 1.09 (95 percent confidence interval [CI]=0.79–1.48) for women who ever used OCs cf women who never used OCs. The relative rates (with CIs) for women who used OCs for a period < 5 years, 5–9 years, 10–14 years, and 15+ years were 0.97 (0.61–1.55), 1.20 (0.69–2.07), 1.03 (0.60–1.77), and 1.96 (0.99–3.89), respectively. The test for trend was not significant (P=0.13). There was no evidence of any association between the number of years between the first and the last use of OCs and breast cancer incidence. In the subgroup of women with first-degree relatives with breast cancer, the RR for breast cancer associated with ever use of OCs was 1.51 (CI=0.67–3.41), whereas in the remaining women, the RR was 0.97 (CI=0.73–1.27). Ever-use of HRT compared with never-use was not associated with an increase in breast cancer risk in the multivariate analysis (RR=0.99, CI=0.68–1.43). Also, the number of years of HRT use was not associated with an increased breast cancer risk (trend P=0.83), nor was the number of years between the first and the last use of HRT and breast cancer incidence. One subgroup of women in which the use of HRT seemed associated (but not significantly) with an increase in breast cancer risk was women with an induced menopause (RR=1.72, CI=0.95–3.12). The RR of breast cancer for women who had ever used both OCs and HRT, compared with women who never used these exogenous hormones was 1.00 (CI=0.51–1.94). From this study, it cannot be concluded that the use of exogenous hormones is a strong risk factor for the development of postmenopausal breast cancer.Since the acceptance of this paper, two other papers have been published on HRT and breast cancer. For HRT (estrogen alone), one supports our finding of no association (Stanford et al, JAMA 1995; 274: 137–42) and one did find a positive association for current use (Colditz et al, New Engl J Med 1995; 332: 1589–93), most pronounced in older women with longer durations of use. With regard to use of combined estrogen-progestin HRT, the results in both papers were comparable to those for estrogen alone. More research on (combinations of) types of hormones is needed.This work was supported by the Dutch Cancer Society.     

A case-control study of breast cancer and hormonal contraception in Costa Rica

By 1981, 11% of married women in Costa Rica ages 20-49 years had used depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) and 58% had used oral contraceptives (OCs). Since 1977, the Costa Rican Ministry of Health has maintained a nationwide cancer registry. These circumstances provided an opportunity for a population-based, case-control study of DMPA, OCs, and breast cancer in Costa Rica. Cases were 171 women ages 25-58 years with breast cancer diagnosed between 1982 and 1984; controls were 826 women randomly chosen during a nationwide household survey. Cases and controls were interviewed with the use of a standard questionnaire covering their reproductive and contraceptive histories. Logistic regression methods were used to adjust for confounding factors. While few cases or controls had ever used DMPA, DMPA users had an elevated relative risk (RR) estimate of breast cancer of 2.6 (95% confidence limits = 1.4-4.7) compared with never users. However, no dose-response relationship was found; even the group of women who had used DMPA for less than 1 year had an elevated RR estimate (RR = 2.3; 95% confidence limits = 1.0-5.1). In contrast, OC users had no elevation in RR compared with never users (RR = 1.2; 95% confidence limits = 0.8-1.8). The results of the DMPA analysis are inconclusive. Before decisions are made on whether to continue providing this effective contraceptive method, other ongoing studies will need to confirm of refute these findings.     

Combined effect of oral contraceptive use and hormone replacement therapy on breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women

OBJECTIVE: We examined breast cancer risk related to lifetime exposure to oral contraceptives (OCs) and hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in postmenopausal women. METHODS: The Women's Contraceptive and Reproductive Experiences (CARE) Study was a population-based case-control study that included 1847 postmenopausal women with incident invasive breast cancer, and 1932 control subjects, identified using random digit dialing. RESULTS: 45% of cases and 49% of controls used both OCs and HRT. OC users were not at increased risk regardless of subsequent HRT exposure. HRT users who had used OCs previously did not have a higher risk of breast cancer than women with no exposure to OCs. We observed a negative interaction (p-value: 0.032) of combined hormone replacement therapy (CHRT) and past OC use. The increase in risk with CHRT was stronger in women who had never used OCs in the past (odds ratio: 1.05; 95% confidence interval: 1.01-1.10 per year of exclusive CHRT use) than in women who had used OCs (odds ratio: 1.00; 95% confidence interval: 0.97-1.03). CONCLUSIONS: We found no indication that adverse effects of exposure to OCs or HRT appeared only in the presence of the other hormone or were exacerbated by exposure to the other hormone.     

Oral contraceptives and risk of familial breast cancer

The risk of breast cancer of oral contraceptive (OC) use in 1423 women from families with hereditary/familial breast cancer recruited through a cancer family clinic was analyzed in a matched case-control study. Ninety-eight women tested positive for a BRCA1 mutation. Hazard ratio for ever use of OCs adjusted for other risk factors was 0.90 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.68-1.18) in the total data set and 2.00 (0.36-10.9) in BRCA1 mutation carriers. We did not find evidence for interaction between BRCA1 mutation status and OC use on breast cancer risk. Recent users had a statistically significant increase in risk with hazard ratios of 1.99, 2.05, and 1.69 for up to 5, 10, and 15 years since last OC use, while users with more than 15 years since last use had a reduction of risk to 0.69 compared to never users. We conclude that the effects of OC use on breast cancer risk in familial breast cancer may be similar to the effects in the general population. For BRCA1 mutation carriers, the point estimate is a doubling of risk, but CI is wide and no conclusion may be drawn from this study alone.     

A prospective study of oral contraceptive use and risk of breast cancer (Nurses' Health Study, United States)

Results of previous epidemiologic studies have provided reassurance that there is little, if any, increase in risk of breast cancer with oral contraceptive (OC) use in general. However, in several studies, an increased risk of breast cancer has been observed in two subgroups, young women who used OCs for extended durations and in women who used OCs prior to a first-term pregnancy. We evaluated these relationships using data from the ongoing Nurses' Health Study cohort (United States). We documented 3,383 cases of breast cancer from 1976 to 1992 among 1.6 million person-years of follow-up. We observed no overall relationship between duration of OC use and breast cancer risk, even among women who reported using OCs for 10 or more years (multivariate relative risk [RR]=1.11, 95 percent confidence interval [CI]=0.94-1.32). Among women less than 45 years of age, the multivariate RR for using OCs for 10 or more years was 1.07 (CI=0.70-1.65) compared with never-users. The risk associated with five or more years of OC use prior to a first full-term pregnancy compared with never-use was 0.96 (CI=0.65-1.43). Among women less than 45 years of age, we observed no evidence of an increased risk with OC use before a first full-term pregnancy (use for five or more years: RR=0.57, CI=0.24-1.31). Because of the age distribution of our cohort, we were unable to evaluate these relationships among women less than 40 years of age. Our study provides considerable evidence that long-term past OC use, either overall or prior to a first full-term pregnancy, does not result in any appreciable increase in breast cancer risk in women over 40 years of age.     

Recent oral contraceptive use and risk of breast cancer (United States)

We examined the association between recent oral contraceptive (OC) use and the risk of breast cancer in data from a large population-based case-control study in the United States. Cases (n=6,751) were women less than 75 years old who had breast cancer identified from statewide tumor registries in Wisconsin, Massachusetts, Maine, and New Hampshire. Controls (n=9,311) were selected randomly from lists of licensed drivers (if aged under 65 years) and from lists of Medicare beneficiaries (if aged 65 through 74 years). Information on OC use, reproductive experiences, and family and medical history was obtained by telephone interview. After adjustment for parity, age at first delivery, and other risk factors, women who had ever used OCs were at similar risk of breast cancer as never-users (relative risk [RR]=1.1, 95 percent confidence interval [CI]=10–1.2). Total duration of usealso was not related to risk. There was a suggestion that more recent use was associated with an increased risk of breast cancer; use less than two years ago was associated with an RR of 1.3 (CI=0.9–1.9). However, only among women aged 35 to 45 years at diagnosis was the increase in risk among recent users statistically significantly elevated (RR=2.0, CI=1.1–3.9). Use prior to the first pregnancy or among nulliparous women was not associated with increased risk. Among recent users of OCs, the risk associated with use was greatest among non-obese women, e.g., among women with body mass index (kg/m²) less than 20.4, RR=1.7, CI=1.1–2.8. While these results suggest that, in general, breast cancer risk is not increased substantially among women who have used OCs, they also are consistent with a slight increased risk among subgroups of recent users.Authors are with the University of Wisconsin Comprehensive Cancer Center, Madison, WI, USA (Dr Newcomb, Ms Trentham Dietz); NIEHS Epidemiology Branch, Research Triangle Park, NC (Dr Longnecker); Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA (Dr Surer); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pritzker School of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL (Dr Mittendorf); Department of Community and Family Medicine, Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, NH (Dr Baron); Boston University, School of Public Health, Boston, MA (Dr Clapp); Department of Epidemiology and Department of Nutrition, Harvard School of Public Health, and Channing Laboratory, Harvard Medical School and Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA (Dr Willett). Address correspondence to: Dr Polly A. Newcomb, University of Wisconsin-Madison Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1300 University Ave., #4780, Madison, WI 53706, USA. Supported by Public Health Service (National Cancer Institute) grants R01 CA 47147 and R01 CA 47305.     

Increased risk of breast cancer following different regimens of hormone replacement therapy frequently used in Europe

Epidemiologic studies have shown an increased risk of breast cancer following hormone replacement therapy (HRT). The aim of this study was to investigate whether different treatment regimens or the androgenecity of progestins influence the risk of breast cancer differently. The Danish Nurse Cohort was established in 1993, where all female nurses aged 45 years and above received a mailed questionnaire (n = 23,178). A total of 19,898 women returned the questionnaire (86%). The questionnaire included information on HRT types and regimens, reproductive history and lifestyle-related factors. Breast cancer cases were ascertained using nationwide registries. The follow-up ended on 31 December 1999. Women with former cancer diagnoses, women with missing information on HRT, surgical menopause, premenopausal, as well as hysterectomized women were excluded, leaving 10,874 for analyses. Statistical analyses were performed using Cox proportional hazards model. A total of 244 women developed breast cancer during follow-up. After adjustment for confounding factors, an increased risk of breast cancer was found for the current use of estrogen only (RR = 1.96; 95% CI = 1.16-3.35), for the combined use of estrogen and progestin (RR = 2.70; 95% CI = 1.96-3.73) and for current users of tibolone (RR = 4.27; 95% CI = 1.74-10.51) compared to the never use of HRT. In current users of combined HRT with testosterone-like progestins, the continuous combined regimens were associated with a statistically significant higher risk of breast cancer than the cyclical combined regimens (RR = 4.16, 95% CI = 2.56-6.75, and RR = 1.94, 95% CI = 1.26-3.00, respectively). An increased risk of breast cancer was noted with longer durations of use for the continuous combined regimens (p for trend = 0.048). The European traditional HRT regimens were associated with an increased risk of breast cancer. The highest risk was found for the use of continuous combined estrogen and progestin.     

Influence of exogenous estrogens, proliferative breast disease, and other variables on breast cancer risk

The authors reevaluated 10,366 consecutive breast biopsy specimens of benign lesions performed between 1950 and 1968. Follow-up information was obtained on 3303 women with a median duration of follow-up of 17 years. This sample contained 84% of the patients originally selected for follow-up. The relative risk (RR) of developing breast cancer was 0.98 for women who took exogenous estrogens as compared to 1.8 for women who did not. Exogenous estrogens lowered the observed breast cancer risk in women with atypical hyperplasia (RR = 3.0 versus 4.5), proliferative disease without atypia (RR = 0.92 versus 1.9), and in women without proliferative disease (RR = 0.69 versus 0.91). Women who took estrogens before 1956 were at 2.3 times the risk of other estrogen users, presumably due to a dose effect. There was no significant association between breast cancer risk and birth control pills, cigarette smoking, or alcohol consumption. Exogenous estrogens are not associated with increased breast cancer risk in women with benign breast disease. A previous history of benign breast disease does not contraindicate replacement estrogen therapy.     

Physical activity and risk of breast cancer in premenopausal women

Physical activity appears to be inversely related to risk of breast cancer, yet the results remain inconsistent. To evaluate this relation among premenopausal women and examine variation in risk according to level of obesity and use of oral contraceptives (OCs), the authors examined data from the Nurses' Health Study II. During 10 years of follow-up, 849 cases of invasive premenopausal breast cancer were confirmed. Physical activity was assessed by self-report at baseline and during follow-up using a validated questionnaire. Total physical activity was unrelated to risk of breast cancer. Women engaging in >or=27 metabolic equivalent (MET)-h week(-1) had a multivariate-adjusted relative risk (RR) of 1.04 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.82-1.33) compared to those in the <3 MET-h week(-1) category. Among women with a BMI >or=30 kg m(-2), we observed a significant positive dose-response relation (P=0.04). Activity was unrelated to breast cancer risk at lower levels of BMI. A test for interaction between activity and BMI (<30, >or=30 kg m(-2)) was statistically significant (P=0.02). Among current OC users, higher activity was associated with a non-significantly lower risk of breast cancer (RR=0.59, 95% CI 0.30-1.16 for >or=27 vs <9 MET-h week(-1), P for linear trend=0.14). These results show no overall association between physical activity and risk of breast cancer among premenopausal women, but suggest that the effect of physical activity could be substantially modified by the underlying degree of adiposity. The potential interactions between physical activity, adiposity, and current use of OCs require further study.     

Oral contraceptives and breast cancer: results from an expanded case-control study

The relationship between oral contraceptives and breast cancer was evaluated among 2,022 cases and 2,183 controls participating in a multicentre breast cancer screening programme. Ever use of oral contraceptives was not related to breast cancer risk (RR = 1.0, 95% CI 0.9-1.2), and no overall patterns of increasing or decreasing risks were observed according to the duration of use, or time since first or most recent use. Although we had no women with extended periods of oral contraceptive use early in life, no evidence of adverse effects attributable to short-term use before age 25, before first live birth or during the perimenopausal period were observed. Further, oral contraceptives did not interact with other breast cancer risk factors, except among those with a history of two or more breast biopsies (RR = 2.0). Analyses by stage of disease revealed that risk was related to the duration of oral contraceptive use: greater than or equal to 5 years use was associated with reduced risk for in situ cancer (RR = 0.59) and increased risks for invasive cancers (RR = 1.5 and 1.4 respectively for small and large lesions). These data suggest that oral contraceptive effects may vary by stage of disease, but provide no overall evidence of an association between oral contraceptives and breast cancer.     

Survival in breast cancer and age at start of oral contraceptive usage.

In general, findings in studies on oral contraceptives (OCs) and breast cancer have not indicated prognosis to be worse among users of OCs. In few studies, however, has age at the start of OC usage been considered as a prognostic factor. In the present study, prognosis in breast cancer is compared with OC usage, particularly with age at the start of OC usage, among 193 consecutive patients at the Department of Oncology, University Hospital, Lund. An earlier series of 193 breast cancer patients at Malm? General Hospital is included for comparisons. In the Lund series, five-year survival was 62% among women who started to use OCs before the age of 20.78% among those who started to use OCs between the ages of 20 and 25, and 86% among non-users and those who started to use OCs after the age of 25 (p = 0.009, test for homogeneity). Although age was found to be a prognostic factor in the Lund series (RR = 0.90, p = 0.001), this was not so in the earlier (older) Malm? series. The relationship with age differed significantly between the two series (p = 0.003), suggesting the apparent effect of age at diagnosis to be a cohort effect due to the introduction of OCs during the 'sixties. The age-specific relationship between survival and OC usage would seem to indicate the presence of a biological mechanism in which OCs may participate during precancerous and early stages of breast cancer.     

Estrogen replacement therapy and risk of fatal breast cancer in a prospective cohort of postmenopausal women in the United States

This study examines the relationship between fatal breast cancer and use of estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) among women in a large prospective study in the United States. After nine years of follow-up, 1,469 breast cancer deaths were observedin a cohort of 422,373 postmenopausal women who were cancer free at study entry and who supplied information on estrogen use. Results from Cox proportional hazards modeling, adjusted for 11 other potential risk factors, showed that ever-use of ERT was associated with a significantly decreased risk of fatal breast cancer (rate ratio [RR]=0.84,95 percent confidence interval [CI]=0.75–0.94). There was a moderate trend (P=0.07) of decreasing risk with younger age at first use of ERT. This decreased risk was most pronounced in women who experienced natural menopause before the age of 40 years (RR=0.59, CI=0.40–0.87). There was no discernible trend of increasing risk with duration of use in estrogen users at baseline or former users, nor was there any trend in years since last use in former users. The relationship between ERT and breast cancer mortality differed by age at menarche and by a self-reported history of breast cysts. No increased risk of fatal breast cancer with ERT was observed with estrogen use status (baseline/former), age at first use, duration of use, or years since last use. These findings suggest that ever-use of ERT is associated with a 16 percent decreased risk of fatal breast cancer.     

Breast cancer and the pill--a further report from the Royal College of General Practitioners' oral contraception study

An analysis of the occurrence of breast cancer in this long-term prospective cohort study shows a significant relative risk (RR) in women who have ever used oral contraceptives (OC) of 3.33 in women age 30 to 34 years at diagnosis and an RR of 5.88 (P = 0.0011) in women who were parity 1 at the time of diagnosis. In women below the age of 35 years the RR of 2.38 was not significant. There was no increased risk in women over the age of 35 years. A significant trend relating to duration of use was demonstrable in women who were parity 1 in the analysis of both current and ever-users. An analysis by time since stopping OC use revealed a significant trend in all ever-users, but the trends were much steeper in women of parity 1 or aged 30 to 34 years at diagnosis. There was no evidence that the increased rates in OC users were related to the oestrogen or progestogen dose. The 5 year survival rate in users diagnosed under the age of 35 years was significantly poorer than in comparable non-users. It is possible that the increased rates in younger OC users might be due to an accelerated presentation of breast cancer in those women who would otherwise have been diagnosed at a later time. The non-significant excess risk in users under 35 years of age was approximately 1 in 7,000 users per year. The unresolved discrepancies between the results of the published studies make it impossible at the present time to decide whether or not OC use is associated with an increased risk of breast cancer.     

Breast cancer and specific types of oral contraceptives: a large Norwegian cohort study

The aim of our study was to examine the risk of breast cancer according to specific types of estrogens and progestagens in oral contraceptives (OCs) based on the prospective Norwegian Women and Cancer study (NOWAC). Between 1991-97 women aged 30-70 years were drawn at random from the central person register and mailed an invitation and a questionnaire. Women (102,443) were enrolled with follow-up information collected throughout 1999 by linkage with national registries of cancer, mortality and emigration based on the unique national identification number. Among the 96,362 women included in the present analysis 851 invasive breast cancer were diagnosed. The adjusted risk of breast cancer increased with 25% for ever use of OCs and the risk increased with increasing duration of use (test for trend: p = 0.007). No association between time since last use and breast cancer risk was found after stratification on duration of use. Positive trend was still found for total duration of use among women who used OCs more than 5 years ago. Second generation of OCs had an increased risk with increasing duration of use. Classifying progestagens according to chemical groups, the relative risk increased significantly with increasing cumulative dose of levonorgestrel progestagen. It was difficult to conclude for the other groups due to lack of power. In a multivariate analysis the cumulative dose for all progestagen groups were non-significant, although we observed a significant increased risk with increasing milligram-months of estrogen exposure (p = 0.002). In conclusion, the increased risk of breast cancer related with OC formulations could be due mostly to estrogen component.     

Risk of breast cancer in relation to use of combined oral contraceptives near the age of menopause

Data from a multinational, hospital-based, case-control study were analyzed to determine whether use of combined oral contraceptives (OC) around the time of menopause preferentially increases risk of breast cancer. Results show that the relative risk (RR) of breast cancer was increased in women of all ages who had used oral contraceptives within the past year, but not to a greater extent in women near the age of menopause than in younger women. RRs did not increase with duration of OC use after age 45 in either pre- or postmenopausal women. RRs also were not found to be higher in women who were using OCs near the time of either a natural or artificial menopause than in women who used them at other times. This study thus provides no support for the hypothesis that OCs enhance risk of breast cancer by a greater amount when taken around the time of menopause than when taken at other times.Dr Thomas and Ms Noonan are with the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1124 Columbia Street, Seattle, WA 98104, USA. The Data Collection Centers and the Principal Investigators, Co-investigators, and Pathologists at each participating center in alphabetical order by country, are given in the Appendix. Address correspondence to Dr Thomas. This research received financial support from the Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, World Health Organization, and from Contract No. N01-HD-52901 from the US National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.     

Hormone replacement therapy after breast cancer: a systematic review and quantitative assessment of risk.

PURPOSE: Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) is typically withheld from women with breast cancer because of concern that it might increase the risk of recurrence. The purpose of this study was to quantify the risk of recurrent breast cancer associated with HRT among breast cancer survivors. METHODS: We performed a systematic literature review through May 1999, calculating the relative risk (RR) of breast cancer recurrence in each study by comparing the number of recurrences in the HRT group to those in the control group. In studies that did not contain a control group, we constructed one by estimating the expected number of recurrences based on data from the Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group, adjusting for nodal status and disease-free interval. RRs across all studies were combined using random-effects models. RESULTS: Of the 11 eligible studies, four had control groups and included 214 breast cancer survivors who began HRT after a mean disease-free interval of 52 months. Over a mean follow-up of 30 months, 17 of 214 HRT users experienced recurrence (4.2% per year), compared with 66 of 623 controls (5.4% per year). HRT did not seem to affect breast cancer recurrence risk (RR = 0.64, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.36 to 1.15). Including all 11 studies in the analyses (669 HRT users), using estimated control groups for the seven uncontrolled trials, the combined RR was 0.82 (95% CI, 0.58 to 1.15). CONCLUSION: Although our analyses suggest that HRT has no significant effect on breast cancer recurrence, these findings were based on observational data subject to a variety of biases.     

Type of postmenopausal hormone use and risk of breast cancer: 12-year follow-up from the Nurses' Health Study

We prospectively examined the use of hormone replacement therapy in relation to breast cancer incidence in a cohort of women 30 to 55 years of age in 1976. During 12 years of follow-up (480,665 person-years) among postmenopausal women, 1,050 incident cases of breast cancer were documented. Overall, past users of replacement estrogen were not at increased risk. After adjustment for established risk factors, type of menopause, age at menopause, and current age, the rate ratio (RR) was 0.91, 95 percent confidence interval (CI) = 0.78–1.07. the risk of breast cancer was elevated significantly among current users (RR = 1.33, CI = 1.12–1.57); after adjusting for age, we observed no evidence of increasing risk with increasing duration of use among current users (P trend = 0.41), or among past users (P trend = 0.46). Women currently using unopposed estrogen (RR = 1.42, CI = 1.19–1.70), estrogen and progesterone (RR = 1.54, CI = 0.99–2.39), or progesterone alone (RR = 2.52, CI = 0.66–9.63), were all at increased risk of breast cancer compared with never users. These data suggest that long-term past use of estrogen replacement therapy is not related to risk, that current estrogen use increases risk of breast cancer to a modest degree, and that the addition of progesterone does not remove the increased risk observed with current use of unopposed estrogen.The authors are with the Nurses' Health Study, Channing Laboratory, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. Address correspondence to Dr Colditz, Channing Laboratory, 180 Longwood Ave., Boston, MA 02115-5899, USA. Supported by research grant CA40356 from the National Cancer Institute, NIH, Department of Health and Human Services. Dr Colditz is supported by an American Cancer Society Faculty Research Award FRA-398.