Synovial biopsy

In patients with arthritis, synovial tissue is easily accessible for analysis. Blind needle biopsy is a simple and safe procedure. Arthroscopic biopsy is also safe, it allows access to most sites in the joint and it can provide adequate tissue for extensive laboratory investigations, both before and after successful therapy. Synovial tissue analysis has been successfully applied to the study of disease mechanisms and response to treatment. In addition, there may be an indication for diagnostic synovial biopsy in selected cases.     

Endobiliary biopsy

The differential diagnosis between benign and malignant biliary strictures is challenging and requires a multidisciplinary approach with the use of serum biomarkers, imaging techniques, and several modalities of endoscopic or percutaneous tissue sampling. The diagnosis of biliary strictures consists of laboratory markers, and invasive and non-invasive imaging examinations such as computed tomography (CT), contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS). Nevertheless, invasive imaging modalities combined with tissue sampling are usually required to confirm the diagnosis of suspected malignant biliary strictures, while pathological diagnosis is mandatory to decide the optimal therapeutic strategy. Although EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy is currently the standard procedure for tissue sampling of solid pancreatic mass lesions, its diagnostic value in intraductal infiltrating type of cholangiocarcinoma remains limited. Moreover, the “endobiliary approach” using novel slim biopsy forceps, transpapillary and percutaneous cholangioscopy, and intraductal ultrasound-guided biopsy, is gaining ground on traditional endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography endobiliary forceps biopsy. This review focuses on the available endobiliary techniques currently used to perform biliary strictures biopsy, comparing the diagnostic performance of endoscopic and percutaneous approaches.     

Endomyocardial biopsy

Endomyocardial biopsy has been used more frequently over the past 10 years in an increasing number of centers in this country and abroad. When done by an experienced physician, it is as safe as routine cardiac catheterization. Although biopsy is not yet applicable in all cases of myocardial disease, many investigators have found this procedure valuable in specific circumstances, including cardiac allograft rejection, anthracycline-induced cardiomyopathy, and myocarditis. With this technique diagnoses can be made for various disorders including cardiac amyloidosis, sarcoidosis, hemochromatosis, and endomyocardial fibrosis. Although helpful in detecting an unsuspected condition or in formulating prognosis in some patients, biopsy is not diagnostically specific in patients with dilated or hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, because these diseases have no completely pathognomonic features under current examination methods. The proper practice of endomyocardial biopsy requires both technical proficiency and expert pathologic interpretation. As a research tool, biopsy will continue to yield new knowledge about myocardial disease and its treatment.     

Myocardial biopsy

After a short historical introduction the indications for myocardial biopsy are discussed with focus on the more controversial among them. The probable directions of development of its indications are then analysed and finally its complications are reviewed pointing out their extreme rarity specially the more severe ones.