Identification of Ethanol-intoxicated Patients with Minor Head TVauma Requiring Computed Tomography Scans

Objective: To determine whether clinical parameters and neurologic scores can be used to guide the decision to obtain computed tomography (CT) head scans for ethanol-intoxicated patients with presumed-minor head injuries.
Methods: In a prospective cohort analysis, 107 consecutive adult patients who presented to a county emergency department (ED) with serum ethanol levels >80 mg/dL and minor head trauma were studied. Commonly used clinical variables were determined for each patient. Each patient also underwent an abbreviated neurologic scoring examination and a Glasgow coma scale (GCS) score evaluation at the time of presentation and one hour later, after which a cranial CT scan was done. For purposes of analysis, patients with and patients without intracerebral injuries visible on CT scans of the head were compared.
Results: Nine of 107 patients (8.4%; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.9–15.4%) had CT scans that were positive for intracerebral injury. Two patients (1.9%; 95% CI = 0.2–6.6%) needed craniotomy. Five patients had hemotympanum and two patients had bilateral periorbital ecchy-mosis, but CT scans were negative for intracerebral injury in these patients. There was no statistically significant difference between the patients with and without CT scan abnormalities, based on the clinical variables, the GCS scores, or the abbreviated neurologic scoring examinations at presentation or at one hour.
Conclusion: The prevalence of intracerebral injury in CT scans of ethanol-intoxicated patients with minor head injuries was 8.4%. Commonly used clinical parameters and neurologic scores at presentation and one hour later were unable to predict which patients would have intracerebral injuries as evidenced by CT scans. Our low (1.9%) neurosurgical intervention rate supports the need to develop a selective approach to CT scanning in this population.     

Computerized tomography of the brain for elderly patients presenting to the emergency department with acute confusion

Objective: Confusion is a common reason for presentation of elderly patients to the ED. There are many potential causes of confusion, which include acute neurological events. Computerized tomography (CT) scans are often routinely ordered to investigate confusion, despite the recommendation of guidelines against routine use. The aim of the present study was to determine the usefulness of CT brain scans in a prospective cohort of confused elderly patients presenting to an ED. Methods: The progress notes of 106 consecutive patients over 70 years of age who had a CT brain scan for a presentation of acute confusion were reviewed for indications for the scan and the presence of neurological examination findings. Official radiology reports of CT brain scans were assessed for the presence of abnormalities. Results: Of the 106 patients, 12 (11%, 95% CI 5.29–17.35) had no documented neurological examination. Fifteen patients (14%, 95% CI 7.51–20.79) had acute abnormalities on CT scan, one of whom had two abnormalities. There were ten acute ischaemic strokes, four cerebral haemorrhages and two meningiomas. Thirteen of the patients with positive CT findings (93%, 95% CI 80.7–105.96) had new findings on neurological examination. The only patient with no neurological findings with a positive CT scan had had a fall. A history of a fall or the presence of neurological findings on examination was predictive of a positive CT scan (odds ratio 17.07, 95% CI 2.15–135.35). Conclusion: The results add further support to guidelines that suggest that CT scans of the brain for confused elderly patients should only be performed for those with acute neurological findings, head trauma or a fall.     

Can Patients with Brain Herniation on Cranial Computed Tomography Have a Normal Neurologic Exam?

Objectives:  Herniation of the brain outside of its normal intracranial spaces is assumed to be accompanied by clinically apparent neurologic dysfunction. The authors sought to determine if some patients with brain herniation or significant brain shift diagnosed by cranial computed tomography (CT) might have a normal neurologic examination.
Methods:  This is a secondary analysis of the National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study (NEXUS) II cranial CT database compiled from a multicenter, prospective, observational study of all patients for whom cranial CT scanning was ordered in the emergency department (ED). Clinical information including neurologic examination was prospectively collected on all patients prior to CT scanning. Using the final cranial CT radiology reports from participating centers, all CT scans were classified into three categories: frank herniation, significant shift without frank herniation, and minimal or no shift, based on predetermined explicit criteria. These reports were concatenated with clinical information to form the final study database.
Results:  A total of 161 patients had CT-diagnosed frank herniation; 3 (1.9%) had no neurologic deficit. Of 91 patients with significant brain shift but no herniation, 4 (4.4%) had no neurologic deficit.
Conclusions:  A small number of patients may have normal neurologic status while harboring significant brain shift or brain herniation on cranial CT.     

Elder Patients with Closed Head Trauma: A Comparison with Nonelder Patients

Abstract. Objective: Little is known about the circumstances surrounding closed head trauma (CHT) in elders, and how they differ from nonelders. The study objective was to compare the 2 populations for outcome (positive cranial CT scan depicting traumatic injury, or the need for neurosurgery), mechanism of injury, and the value of the neurologic examination to predict a CT scan positive for traumatic injury or the need for neurosurgical intervention. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted by collecting a case series of patients with blunt head trauma who underwent CT scanning, and comparing elder (aged s60 years) with nonelder patients. The setting was the ED of a university-affiliated Level-1 trauma center. Results: Twenty percent of the elders and 13% of the nonelders had CT scans positive for traumatic injury, which conferred a risk ratio of 1.58 (95% CI 1.21–2.05). Older women were more at risk for the need for neurosurgery than were younger ones (3.1 vs 0.3%, RR 10.66, 95% CI 1.26–90.46). Among the elders, falls were the dominant mechanism of closed head trauma, followed by motor vehicle collisions (MVCs), then being struck as a pedestrian. In the nonelders, MVCs, falls, and assaults were the most important mechanisms of injury. A focally abnormal neurologic examination imparted an increased risk for both a CT scan positive for traumatic injury (elder 4.39, 95% CI 2.91–6.62; nonelder 7.75, 95% CI 5.53–10.72) and the need for neurosurgery (elder 35.68, 95% CI 4.58–275.89; nonelder 142.58, 95% CI 19.11–1064.22) in both age groups. Conclusions : Significant differences exist between elder and nonelder victims of CHT with respect to mechanisms of trauma and outcomes (CT scan positive for traumatic injury, or the need for neurosurgery).     

The impact of CT head scans on ED management and length of stay in bizarre behavior patients

Methods

A 5-year retrospective chart review was conducted at 3 EDs. Inclusion criteria were patients ≥18 years old triaged as “mental health - bizarre behavior” (deviation from normal cognitive behaviour with no obvious cause) with a CT head scan ordered in the ED. Exclusion criteria were focal neurologic deficits on exam, alternative medical etiology (i.e. delirium, trauma) and/or pre-existing CNS disease. Clinical, demographic and administrative data were extracted with 10% of charts independently reviewed by an Emergency Physician for inter-rater reliability.

Is Hospital Admission and Observation Required after a Normal Abdominal Computed Tomography Scan in Children with Blunt Abdominal Trauma?

Objectives: The objective was to determine if hospital admission of children with blunt abdominal trauma for observation of possible intraabdominal injury (IAI) is necessary after a normal abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan in the emergency department (ED). Methods: The authors conducted a prospective observational cohort study of children less than 18 years of age with blunt abdominal trauma who underwent an abdominal CT scan in the ED. Abdominal CT scans were obtained with intravenous contrast but no oral contrast. The decision to hospitalize the patient was made by the attending emergency physician (EP) with the trauma or pediatric surgery teams. An abnormal abdominal CT scan was defined by the presence of any visualized IAI or findings suggestive of possible IAI (e.g., intraperitoneal fluid without solid organ injury). Patients were followed to determine if IAI was later diagnosed and the need for acute therapeutic intervention if IAI was present. Results: A total of 1,295 patients underwent abdominal CT, and 1,085 (84%) patients had normal abdominal CT scans in the ED and make up the study population. Seven‐hundred thirty‐seven (68%) were hospitalized, and 348 were discharged to home. None of the 348 patients discharged home and 2 of the 737 hospitalized patients were identified with an IAI after a normal initial abdominal CT. The IAIs in patients with normal initial CT scans included a 10‐year‐old with a mesenteric hematoma and serosal tear at laparotomy and a 10‐year‐old with a perinephric hematoma on repeat CT. Neither underwent specific therapy. The negative predictive value (NPV) of a normal abdominal CT scan for IAI was 99.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 99.3% to 100%). Conclusions: Children with blunt abdominal trauma and a normal abdominal CT scan in the ED are at very low risk of having a subsequently diagnosed IAI and are very unlikely to require a therapeutic intervention. Hospitalization of children for evaluation of possible undiagnosed IAI after a normal abdominal CT scan has a low yield and is generally unnecessary.     

Use of a complete neurological examination to screen for significant intracranial abnormalities in minor head injury

Indications for head computed tomography (CT) scans are unclear in patients with nonpenetrating head injury and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores of 15. We performed a prospective study to determine if significant intracranial injury could be excluded in patients with GCS-15 and a normal complete neurological examination. A prospective trial of clinically sober adult patients with GCS = 15 on emergency department (ED) presentation after closed head injury with loss of consciousness or amnesia was conducted from May 1996 through April 1997. All subjects underwent a standardized neurological examination including mental status evaluation, and assessment of motor, sensory, cerebellar and reflex function before CT scan. During the study period, 58 patients met inclusion criteria. Fifty-five patients (95%) had normal CT scans and 23 (42%) had focal neurological abnormalities. Three patients (5%) had CT scan findings of acute intracranial injury, two of whom had normal neurological examinations. One patient had an acute subdural hematoma requiring emergent surgical decompression; the other had both an epidural hematoma and pneumocephalus that did not require surgery. Significant brain injury and need for CT scanning cannot be excluded in patients with minor head injury despite a GCS = 15 and normal complete neurological examination on presentation.     

Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Diagnosis: Lumbar Puncture Is Still Needed When the Computed Tomography Scan Is Normal

Objectives: To determine the sensitivity of third-generation CT scanners for diagnosed nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) and to assess the impact of symptom duration on sensitivity.
Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed in a university-affiliated tertiary care hospital with an annual ED volume of >100,000 patients. The target population was all patients who presented to the ED from January 1991 to September 1994 with symptoms suggestive of SAH and who had a final diagnosis of nontraumatic SAH based on either a positive CT scan or positive spinal fluid analysis. Patients referred from outside facilities were included if they had a CT done at the study site. All CT scans were done using third-generation scanners. Official CT scan reports were used to categorize scans as positive or negative.
Results: There were 140 patients identified with SAH, with a mean age of 56 years (range 10–88). The sensitivity of CT in the diagnosis of nontraumatic SAH when performed at or before 12 hours of symptom duration was 100% (80/80), and 81.7% (49/60) after 12 hours of symptom duration (95% CI 95–100% and 69.5–90.4%, respectively; p < 0.0001). Eleven of the 140 patients had a negative CT and positive spinal fluid analysis, yielding an overall sensitivity of 92.1% (129/140).
Conclusion: The sensitivity of third-generation CT scans for SAH decreases with time from the onset of symptoms. In this sample population, CT was able to detect all patients scanned ^12 hours after symptom onset. Although the study demonstrated good sensitivity of CT scan reports for SAH when the scan was performed after S12 hours of symptom onset, additional real-time experience is needed to better define the potential risk of a missed SAH should this population not receive the customary lumbar puncture examination in the setting of a negative CT scan.     

Teleradiology interpretations of emergency department computed tomography scans

Background: Teleradiologist interpretation of radiographic studies during after-hours Emergency Department (ED) care has the potential to influence patient management. Study Objectives: We sought to characterize frequencies of discrepancies between teleradiology and in-house radiology interpretations for computed tomography (CT) scans. Methods: We conducted a prospective observational study comparing teleradiologist and in-house radiologist interpretations of CT scans obtained between 7:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. from the ED at a Level I trauma center. For each scan, discrepancies were characterized as major, minor, or no discrepancy. Follow-up data were used to characterize major discrepancies. Results: Of 787 studies sent to teleradiology, 550 were scans of the head, cervical spine, chest, or abdomen and pelvis. Major discrepancies were identified in 32 of 550 studies (5.8%; 95% confidence interval 4.1%–8.1%), including 7 of 160 head CT scans, 1 of 29 cervical spine CT scans, 3 of 64 chest CT scans, and 21 of 297 abdominopelvic CT scans. We attributed 8 of the 32 major discrepancies to a teleradiology misinterpretation, with one case leading to an adverse event. Conclusions: We identified major discrepancies due to teleradiologist misinterpretation in 8 of 550 studies, with one patient suffering an adverse event. Our findings support the cautious use of teleradiology interpretations.     

A Decision Guideline for Emergency Department Utilization of Noncontrast Head Computed Tomography in HIV-infected Patients

OBJECTIVE: To determine which neurologic signs or symptoms are predictive of new focal lesions on head CT in HIV-infected patients. METHODS: Prospective study with convenience sample enrollment of HIV-infected patients who presented to a large inner-city university-based ED over an 11-month period. Patients were assessed using a standardized neurologic evaluation to ascertain whether they had developed new or changed neurologic signs or symptoms. Patients with any new or changed neurologic findings had a head CT scan in the ED. The association between individual complaints or findings and new focal lesions on head CT was assessed by univariate analysis, and sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive values were calculated. Stepwise logistic regression analysis was then carried out to estimate the relative risk for those variables independently associated with new focal lesions on CT scans. A decision guideline was developed incorporating those variables. RESULTS: One hundred ten patients were identified as having new or changed neurologic signs or symptoms and had a head CT done in the ED. Twenty-seven patients (24%) had focal lesions on head CT, of which 19 (18%) were identified as new focal lesions; eight of these (7%) demonstrated a mass effect. Clinical findings most strongly associated with new focal findings on head CT were: 1) new seizure, relative risk (RR) = 73.5, 95% CI = 6.2 to 873.0; 2) depressed or altered orientation, RR = 39.1, 95% CI = 4.6 to 330.0; and 3) headache, different in quality, RR = 27.0, 95% CI = 3.2 to 230.1. Use of these three findings as a screen for ordering head CT in the ED would have identified 95% (18/19) of the patients with new focal intracranial lesions, and resulted in a 53% reduction in the number of head CTs ordered in the ED. Inclusion of one additional parameter (prolonged headache, > or =3 days), would have resulted in identification of 100% of all new focal lesions, with a 37% reduction in the number of head CTs ordered. Among those patients with new focal findings, 74% required emergent management (i.e., seizure control, IV antibiotics, IV steroids or surgery). The most common intracranial lesion among patients with CD4 counts less than 200 cells/microL was toxoplasmosis, while cerebrovascular accidents (ischemic or hemorrhagic) were most common in those with CD4 counts greater than 200 cells/microL. CONCLUSION: Specific clinical signs and symptoms were associated with the presence of new intracranial lesions in a group of HIV-infected patients who presented to the ED with neurologic complaints. These clinical findings can be incorporated into guidelines for determining the need for emergent head CT. Validation and widespread application of these guidelines could result in limiting the use of emergent neuroimaging to a more well-defined HIV-infected patient population.     

Effectiveness of an Organized Follow-up System for Elder Patients Released from the Emergency Department

Objectives : To determine whether an effective telephone callback system can be successfully implemented in a busy ED and to quantify the benefits that can be obtained related to the follow-up care of elder patients.
Methods : This was a prospective, cohort study conducted at a community teaching hospital during a 6-month period. Consecutive patients ≥60 years old and released from the ED were selected for telephone follow-up. Calls were made by a research nurse within 72 hours after the patient's ED visit. Follow-up information included current medical status, problems encountered during the ED visit, compliance, and impact of the illness on self-care capabilities.
Results : Seventy-nine percent (831/1,048) of the patients selected for telephone follow-up were successfully contacted. The calls lasted an average of 4 ± 2.5 minutes. Although 94% (778/831) of these patients had a regular physician, 14% failed to make their recommended follow-up arrangements. Compliance was significantly improved when a follow-up physician was contacted during the patient's ED visit. Approximately 96% of the patients were either satisfied or very satisfied with their ED care. However, 13% (109/831) had moderate deterioration in their ability to care for themselves. Of the patients contacted, 333 (40%) required further clarification of their home care instructions, 31 were advised to return to the ED for reevaluation, and 26 were referred to a medical social worker for psychosocial concerns.
Conclusion : A telephone callback system is a feasible and effective method to improve follow-up care of elder patients released from the ED.     

Cranial Computed Tomography in the Emergency Evaluation of Adult Patients without a Recent History of Head Trauma: A Prospective Analysis

Objectives: To examine the pattern of nontrauma cranial CT use in an urban ED, to identify the rate of significant CT abnormalities in this setting, and to develop criteria for restricting the ordering of CT scans. Methods: A prospective, observational study of a case series of adults who underwent cranial CT scanning for nontraumatic cases was performed at the EDs of an urban teaching hospital and an affiliated community hospital with a combined annual census of 110,000. Clinically significant CT scans were defined as: 1) acute stroke, 2) CNS malignancy, 3) acute hydrocephalus, 4) intracranial bleeding, or 5) intracranial infection, χ² recursive partitioning was used to derive a decision rule to restrict ordering of CT scans. Results: Only 61 (8%) of 806 CT scans revealed clinically significant abnormalities. The presence of any of the following: age ≥60 years, focal neurologic deficit, headache with vomiting, or altered mental status, was 100% sensitive (95% CI: 94–100%) and 31% specific (95% CI: 28–33%) in detecting clinically significant CT scans. This set of features had positive and negative predictive values of 11% (95% CI: 8–13%) and 100% (95% CI: 98–100%), respectively. If these criteria had been used to restrict cranial CT use, 229 fewer patients (28%) would have had CT scans obtained and no clinically significant abnormalities would have been missed.
Conclusion: Clinically significant CT abnormalities were uncommon in this study population, suggesting that current criteria for ordering nontrauma cranial CT scans may be too liberal. In this study, a set of clinical criteria was derived that may be useful at separating patients into high- and low-risk categories for clinically significant cranial CT abnormalities. Before these results are applied clinically, these criteria should be validated in larger, prospective studies.     

The impact of body mass index on concordance in the interpretation of matched noncontrast and contrast abdominal pelvic computed tomographic scans in ED patients with nontraumatic abdominal pain

OBJECTIVE: To determine if body mass index (BMI) is associated with interpretation agreement between matched abdominal pelvic computed tomographic (CT) scan performed with and without oral contrast in emergency department (ED) patients. METHODS: A prospective observational trial of a convenience sample of 100 adult patients undergoing an abdominal pelvic CT was done at a tertiary care academic ED from September 4, 2001, to August 30, 2002. Patients with trauma, renal colic, pregnancy, need of intravenous contrast, or who were clinically unstable were excluded. Height, weight, and waist circumference were recorded and BMI was calculated. Patients had a helical abdominal pelvic CT without oral contrast followed by two drinks of oral contrast 90 minutes apart and then a repeat CT. Attending staff radiologists interpreted the CT scans using explicit data sheets and were blinded to the results of the matching CT. Clinically important discordance between the matching scans was determined by a panel of attending staff from radiology and emergency medicine departments. RESULTS: Of the 100 patients who completed the protocol, 21% (95% confidence interval, 13%-30%) had clinically significant disagreement between noncontrast and oral contrast CT interpretations. Logistic regression analyses yielded an odds ratio of 1.0 (95% confidence interval, 0.9-1.1) for BMI. CONCLUSIONS: This study did not find an association between BMI, sex, or waist circumference and concordance of radiologists' interpretation of noncontrast and oral contrast abdominal pelvic CT scans in ED patients.     

Is repeat head CT necessary in patients with mild traumatic intracranial hemorrhage

BackgroundPatients with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (TIH) frequently receive repeat head CT scans (RHCT) to assess for progression of TIH. The utility of this practice has been brought into question, with some studies suggesting that in the absence of progressive neurologic symptoms, the RHCT does not lead to clinical interventions.MethodsThis was a retrospective review of consecutive patients with CT-documented TIH and GCS ≥ 13 presenting to an academic emergency department from 2009 to 2013. Demographic, historical, and physical exam variables, number of CT scans during admission were collected with primary outcomes of: neurological decline, worsening findings on repeat CT scan, and the need for neurosurgical intervention.ResultsOf these 1126 patients with mild traumatic intracranial hemorrhage, 975 had RHCT. Of these, 54 (5.5% (4.2–7.2 95 CI) had neurological decline, 73 (7.5% 5.9–9.3 95 CI) had hemorrhage progression on repeat CT scan, and 58 (5.9% 4.5–7.6 95 CI) required neurosurgical intervention. Only 3 patients (0.3% 0.1–0.9% 95 CI) underwent neurosurgical intervention due to hemorrhage progression on repeat CT scan without neurological decline. In this scenario, the number of RHCT scans needed to be performed to identify this one patient is 305.ConclusionsRHCT after initial findings of TIH and GCS ≥ 13 leading to a change to operative management in the absence of neurologic progression is a rare event. A protocol that includes selective RHCT including larger subdural hematomas or patients with coagulopathy (vitamin K inhibitors and anti-platelet agents) may be a topic for further study.     

Isolated Intraperitoneal Fluid on Abdominal Computed Tomography in Children with Blunt Trauma

OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency of isolated intraperitoneal fluid (IIF) on abdominal computed tomography (CT) in pediatric blunt trauma patients and the association between IIF and clinically identifiable intra-abdominal injuries (IAIs) in these patients. METHODS: The authors conducted a prospective observational study of consecutive children <16 years old with blunt torso trauma who underwent abdominal CT scanning while in the emergency department (ED). All patients were evaluated by a faculty emergency physician who documented the patient's physical examination. All CTs were interpreted by a single faculty radiologist masked to clinical data. The volume of intraperitoneal fluid was quantified (small, moderate, large) and the presence of organ injury visible on CT was noted. Patients were considered to have IIF if the CT demonstrated intraperitoneal fluid and no solid organ injury. Patients with IIF were followed through their hospitalizations or telephoned in one week if discharged home from the ED. RESULTS: Five hundred twenty-seven children with blunt trauma were enrolled into the study. The mean age (+/-SD) was 7.4 +/- 4.7 years, and the median pediatric trauma score was 10 (range -2 to 12). Eighty-eight patients (17%; 95% CI = 14% to 20%) had intraperitoneal fluid on CT scan and 42 (48%; 95% CI = 37% to 59%) of these patients had IIF. Of the 42 patients with IIF, five patients (all without abdominal tenderness and with a small amount of IIF on CT scan) were discharged to home from the ED and were well at telephone follow-up; the remaining 37 patients were hospitalized. Of the 42 patients with IIF, 7 patients (17%, 95% CI = 7 to 31%) had IAIs subsequently identified (all gastrointestinal injuries) during their evaluations. Six of the seven patients with IIF and subsequently identified IAIs had abdominal tenderness on examination in the ED. The remaining patient had a decreased level of consciousness. CONCLUSIONS: Isolated intraperitoneal fluid occurs in 8% of pediatric blunt trauma patients undergoing abdominal CT, and IAIs are subsequently identified in 17% of these patients. Patients with a small amount of IIF on CT who lack abdominal tenderness and have a normal level of consciousness are at low risk for subsequently identified IAIs.     

Intracranial Pathology in Elders with Blunt Head Trauma

Objectives: To examine presentations and prevalence of head injury among elder victims of blunt trauma and to estimate the prevalence of occult injuries associated with a normal level of consciousness, absence of neurologic deficit, and no evidence of significant skull fracture.
Methods: The study population consisted of all patients aged 65 years or older enrolled in the National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study (NEXUS) II head injury cohort. The authors assessed the prevalence and patterns of intracranial injuries among this cohort and compared the prevalence of specific presenting signs and symptoms among injured and uninjured patients. An occult injury subcohort was also constructed, and injury prevalence was examined among this group.
Results: A total of 1,934 elder patients were identified among the 13,326 subjects in NEXUS II (14.5%). Significant intracranial injury, defined as an injury that typically requires procedural intervention or is associated with persistent neurologic impairment or long-term disability, was found in 178 elder patients (9.2%; 95% confidence interval = 8.0% to 10.6%) as compared with 697 individuals among 11,392 younger patients (6.1%; 95% confidence interval = 5.7% to 6.6%). Focal neurologic deficits were present in 55.8% of elder patients with injury. Prevalence of specific injuries among elder and younger patients, respectively, included the following: subdural hematoma, 4.4% and 2.4%; contusion, 4.0% and 3.2%; epidural hematoma, 0.5% and 1.0%; and depressed skull fracture, 0.2% and 0.5%. Forty-two elder patients (2.2%) had an occult injury, compared with only 92 younger patients (0.8%).
Conclusions: Elder patients with head trauma are at higher risk of developing a significant intracranial injury, including subdural and epidural hematoma. An occult presentation is also more common in elders.     

Failure of the Miller Criteria to Predict Significant Intracranial Injury in Patients with a Glasgow Coma Scale Score of 14 after Minor Head Trauma

Objective: To determine the utility of the Miller criteria (presence of headache, nausea, vomiting, and signs of depressed skull fracture) for predicting the need for CT in patients with minor head trauma and a Glasgow Coma Scale score (GCS) of 14.
Methods: The study was a prospective, consecutive series of all patients undergoing head CT scans with a GCS of 14 following head trauma. A data sheet was completed for all patients prior to obtaining a head CT scan.
Results: 264 patients were entered into the study and 35 patients were found to have traumatic abnormalities on head CT scan. The use of the Miller criteria to select those patients who would require head CT scan would have resulted in missing 17 of the 35 abnormal scans, including 2 patients who required neurosurgical intervention. These 2 patients were markedly intoxicated upon presentation.
Conclusion: The use of the Miller criteria as the only criteria for screening patients with a GCS of 14 after minor head trauma who require a head CT scan is not recommended. While the authors have identified ethanol intoxication as one confounding factor, further refinement of this risk-stratification tool is required.     

ED utilization of computed tomography in a poisoned population

The objective of this prospective, analytic study was to identify predictors and describe the demographic and clinical correlates of head computed tomography (CT) evaluation in patients with poisoning or drug overdose and altered mental status. Forty-three patients that were evaluated by head CT and 109 that were not evaluated by head CT were entered into the study at a poison control center. None of the 43 scanned patients had any acute findings on head CT. A logistic regression model yielded 4 predictors that were statistically associated with the ordering of a head CT scan: Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) < or = 8 (odds ratio [OR]: 2.3; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-5.7); age > or = 41 years (OR 5.3; 95% CI 2.2-13); use of drugs or abuse by history (OR 2.8; 95% CI 1.04-7.6); and witnessed seizure activity (OR 4.8; 95% CI 1.3-17.9). We also tested 2 additional models to identify predictors of hospital admission, 1 with and 1 without CT scan included as a covariate. In the first model, only GCS 相似文献   

The Frequency of Unsuspected Minor Illness or Injury in Intoxicated Patients

Objective: To determine the frequency of unsuspected minor illness or injury in a group of patients frequently seen in the ED for acute intoxication.
Methods: The medical records of the 20 patients seen most frequently in the ED for acute intoxication in 1993 were reviewed for the number of ED visits for intoxication, the number of associated documented episodes of minor trauma or illness, the extent of ED workup of discovered illness or injury, and patient disposition from the ED.
Results: The 20 study patients were evaluated in the ED 1,858 times in 1993 for acute intoxication, a mean of 92.5 visits/patient (±26.6). The most frequent injury was minor trauma above the neck, occurring a mean of 9 times (±3.6) in each of the study patients during 1993. Evaluation included repeated neurologic examinations and frequent radiography of the cervical spine ( n = 80), skull ( n = 5), facial bones ( n = 6), and mandible ( n = 5). A limited number of head CT scans also were done ( n = 8). The most frequent minor illnesses were gastritis ( n = 7), managed with hydration, and mild hypothermia ( n = 6), managed with passive rewarming.
Conclusions: The incidence of unsuspected minor illness or injury in this patient group was substantial. While most unsuspected medical problems had little clinical significance, some were potentially dangerous, and some necessitated hospitalization (e.g., hypothermia, hematemesis, and respiratory depression).     

Elderly patients with closed head trauma after a fall: mechanisms and outcomes

Falls in the elderly leading to closed head trauma represent a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in that population, but are not well-characterized. The purpose of this study was to determine the mechanism of fall, outcome, and additional risk factors in elderly patients who require cranial computed tomography (CT) scan after a fall. We conducted a retrospective case series of patients age 60 years and older with closed head trauma secondary to falling who underwent CT scan in the emergency department (ED). Data were gathered from ED and hospital records. The setting was an urban Level I trauma center. Our series consisted of 189 patients, of whom 31 (16%) had an abnormal head CT scan and four (2%) required neurosurgery. Cerebral contusions (38%) and subdural hematomas (33%) were the most common lesions seen on CT scan. Falls from standing (76%) were more common than falls on stairs (19%) or from height (5%), but the latter two were more likely to result in an abnormal CT scan (stairs 42%, height 40%). An abnormal neurologic examination was associated with a higher risk of the need for neurosurgery (risk ratio 11.5). We conclude that among elderly patients who fall and present to an ED with evidence of closed head trauma, a significant percentage will have abnormal CT scans but only a small minority will require neurosurgery. While falls from standing are more common, falls on stairs or from height are associated with a higher risk of having an abnormal CT scan. A focal neurologic examination is a strong predictor of the need for neurosurgical intervention.