The evolving role of inflammatory biomarkers in risk assessment after stent implantation

The main adverse reactions to coronary stents are in-stent restenosis (ISR) and stent thrombosis. Along with procedural factors, individual susceptibility to these events plays an important role. In particular, inflammatory status, as assessed by C-reactive protein levels, predicts the risk of ISR after bare-metal stent implantation, although it does not predict the risk of stent thrombosis. Conversely, C-reactive protein levels fail to predict the risk of ISR after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation, although they appear to predict the risk of stent thrombosis. Of note, DES have abated ISR rates occurring in the classical 1-year window, but new concern is emerging regarding late restenosis and thrombosis. The pathogenesis of these late events seems to be related to delayed healing and allergic reactions to polymers, a process in which eosinophils seem to play an important role by enhancing restenosis and thrombosis. The identification of high-risk individuals based on biomarker assessment may be important for the management of patients receiving stent implantation. In this report, we review the evolving role of inflammatory biomarkers in predicting the risk of ISR and stent thrombosis.     

The future of drug eluting stents

In-stent restenosis (ISR) is the major drawback of percutaneous coronary interventions, occurring in 10-40% of patients. Drug eluting stents (DES) are successful in a large majority of patients in preventing restenosis for the first year after implantation. Recently, new stents have emerged that are loaded with anti-inflammatory, antimigratory, antiproliferative, or pro-healing drugs. These drugs are supposed to inhibit inflammation and neointimal growth and subsequently ISR. The future of DES lies in the development of better stents with new stent designs, better polymers including biological polymers and biological biodissolvable stent coatings, and new, better drugs.     

Coexistent in-stent restenosis, late incomplete stent apposition and mural thrombus in a zotarolimus-eluting stent

Drug-eluting stents (DES) have been demonstrated to dramatically reduce the rate of in-stent restenosis (ISR). However, some studies found an increased rate of late incomplete stent apposition (ISA) and late stent thrombosis (ST) in DES compared to traditional bare-metal stents (BMS). Endeavor stent, a new cobalt-alloy DES coated with phosphorylcholine and zotarolimus, has been reported to have a very favorable safety profile with few documented late-acquired ISA and late ST. In the present report, we described an interesting case with coexistent ISR, late ISA and mural thrombus in an Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stent 8 months after primary percutaneous coronary intervention.     

Diagnosis and management challenges of in-stent restenosis in coronary arteries

Over the course of the 3 decades, percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI) with stent implantation transformed the practice of cardiology. PCI with stenting is currently the most widely performed procedure for the treatment of symptomatic coronary disease. In large trials, drugeluting stents(DES) have led to a significant reduction in in-stent restenosis(ISR) rates, one of the major limitations of bare-metal stents. Due to these favorable findings, DES was rapidly and widely adopted enabling more complex coronary interventions. Nevertheless, ISR remains a serious concern as late stent complications. ISR mainly results from aggressive neointimal proliferation and neoatherosclerosis. DES-ISR treatment continues to be challenging complications for interventional cardiologists.     

Late acute thrombosis after implantation of sirolimus‐eluting stent to treat in‐stent restenosis

Drug‐eluting stents (DES) have significantly reduced the incidence of in‐stent restenosis (ISR) compared to bare metal stents (BMS). However, recent randomized trials comparing DES with BMS reported few cases of late DES thrombosis. We report the case of late sirolimus‐eluting stent thrombosis occurring 22 months after its elective implantation in a restenotic BMS and soon after the interruption of combined anti‐platelet therapy with aspirin and Clopidogrel.     

Second- and third-generation drug-eluting coronary stents: progress and safety

Drug-eluting stents (DES) have revolutionized the treatment of coronary artery disease by reducing the rate of in-stent restenosis from 20-40% with bare-metal stent (BMS) to 6-8% with DES. However, with widespread use of DES, safety concerns have risen due to the observation of late stent thrombosis. With this in mind and better understanding of mechanism and pathophysiology of stent thrombosis, the technological platform, especially innovative anti-restenotic agents, polymeric coatings, and stent platforms, improved with newer DES. Two second-generation DES, the Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) and the Xience-V everolimus-eluting stent (EES), have provided promising results in both randomized controlled trials (SPIRIT and ENDEAVOR) and registries (E-Five, COMPARE) compared with bare-metal stents (BMS) and first-generation DES. Newer third-generation stent technology, especially biodegradable polymers, polymer-free stents, and biodegradable stents on the basis of poly-L-lactide (PLLA) or magnesium, has been evaluated in preclinical and initial clinical trials. However, despite encouraging initial results, long-term data of large-scale randomized trials as well as registries comparing them to currently approved first- and second-generation DES are still lacking.     

Late acute thrombosis after implantation of sirolimus-eluting stent to treat in-stent restenosis

Drug-eluting stents (DES) have significantly reduced the incidence of in-stent restenosis (ISR) compared to bare metal stents (BMS). However, recent randomized trials comparing DES with BMS reported few cases of late DES thrombosis. We report the case of late sirolimus-eluting stent thrombosis occurring 22 months after its elective implantation in a restenotic BMS and soon after the interruption of combined anti-platelet therapy with aspirin and Clopidogrel.     

Second- and third-generation drug-eluting coronary stents

Drug-eluting stents (DES) have revolutionized the treatment of coronary artery disease by reducing the rate of in-stent restenosis from 20?C40% with bare-metal stent (BMS) to 6?C8% with DES. However, with widespread use of DES, safety concerns have risen due to the observation of late stent thrombosis. With this in mind and better understanding of mechanism and pathophysiology of stent thrombosis, the technological platform, especially innovative anti-restenotic agents, polymeric coatings, and stent platforms, improved with newer DES. Two second-generation DES, the Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) and the Xience-V everolimus-eluting stent (EES), have provided promising results in both randomized controlled trials (SPIRIT and ENDEAVOR) and registries (E-Five, COMPARE) compared with bare-metal stents (BMS) and first-generation DES. Newer third-generation stent technology, especially biodegradable polymers, polymer-free stents, and biodegradable stents on the basis of poly-L-lactide (PLLA) or magnesium, has been evaluated in preclinical and initial clinical trials. However, despite encouraging initial results, long-term data of large-scale randomized trials as well as registries comparing them to currently approved first- and second-generation DES are still lacking.     

Classification and Current Treatment Options of In-Stent Restenosis

Coronary stent implantation is currently performed in > 80% of percutaneous coronary interventions. Its main late complication is the development of in-stent restenosis (ISR), occurring in 10-80% of lesions treated in daily practice. The classification by Mehran et al. is most commonly used. Current therapeutic options to treat ISR include repeat balloon angioplasty, repeat stenting, cutting balloon angioplasty, directional coronary atherectomy, rotational coronary atherectomy, brachytherapy, and drug-eluting stents (DES). DES have been effective in reducing binary restenosis in de novo lesions in randomized controlled trials. The novel use of DES to treat ISR has been shown to be safe and effective in multiple studies involving sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents. As DES implantation becomes more widespread, ISR in DES is emerging as a new problem. The use of debulking techniques to treat ISR in DES is to be cautioned against. In this new era, the optimal treatment of this new problem is currently unknown. We await further data to see whether repeat DES implantation may help solve this vexing clinical problem.     

血管内超声在冠状动脉药物洗脱支架晚期血栓研究中的应用

药物洗脱支架与金属裸支架相比,减少了再狭窄的发生率,但其长期安全性却引起了人们的注意。支架置入30 d以后出现的晚期支架内血栓问题成为目前介入心脏病学的研究热点。晚期支架内血栓发生率低,但一旦发生后果严重。有研究显示其发生的原因可能包括动脉的延迟愈合、动脉瘤形成及支架贴壁不良等。现就血管内超声在冠状动脉药物洗脱支架晚期血栓研究中的应用进展做一评述。     

Evolving management of patients treated by drug-eluting stent: Prevention of late events

SummaryDrug eluting stents (DES) were introduced in clinical practice to overcome the problem of in-stent restenosis (ISR) that limited the overall efficacy of percutaneous coronary revascularization with bare metal stent (BMS). Long-term outcome data confirm a sustained benefit of DES as compared with BMS. However, this benefit is mainly evident in the first year of follow-up. Indeed, DES-related events may extend over this time, due to late events (late ISR and/or very late stent thrombosis). Prevention of late failure of DES may become a specific therapeutic target.     

Correlates of clinical restenosis following intracoronary implantation of drug-eluting stents

Despite significant decreases in restenosis and repeated intervention achieved using drug-eluting stents (DESs), the benefit has not been homogenous across all patient and lesion subsets. Identification of correlates of DES restenosis may allow a differing management approach and lead to improved patient outcomes. The study population consisted of 3,535 consecutive patients (5,046 lesions) who underwent successful sirolimus- or paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation for >or=1 native coronary artery or bypass graft lesion from April 2003 to September 2006. From this cohort, 197 patients (237 lesions) were identified to have in-stent restenosis (ISR) requiring revascularization within 12 months of stent implantation. This group was compared with the remainder of the patient population. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of DES ISR. Independent correlates of DES ISR using multivariate analysis included both clinical and procedural factors. Clinical predictors were age, hypertension, and unstable angina. Procedural predictors were left anterior descending artery intervention, number of stents implanted, stented length/lesion, and lack of intravascular ultrasound guidance. Implantation of >or=3 stents was associated with a significantly higher restenosis risk (9.7% vs 5.1%; p=0.0003). A 10-mm increase in stented length was associated with an adjusted odds ratio of 1.18 (95% confidence interval 1.03 to 1.35). Diabetes, stent diameter, and stent type were found not to be predictive of DES ISR. In conclusion, correlates of DES ISR included both clinical and procedural factors. Limiting the number of stents and stented length, in addition to intravascular ultrasound guidance, may minimize DES ISR.     

Advantages and disadvantages of biodegradable platforms in drug eluting stents

Coronary angioplasty with drug-eluting stent(DES)implantation is currently the most common stent procedure worldwide.Since the introduction of DES,coronary restenosis as well as the incidence of target vessel and target lesion revascularization have been significantly reduced.However,the incidence of very late stent thrombosis beyond the first year after stent deployment has more commonly been linked to DES than to baremetal stent(BMS)implantation.Several factors have been associated with very late stent thrombosis after DES implantation,such as delayed healing,inflammation,stent mal-apposition and endothelial dysfunction. Some of these adverse events were associated with the presence of durable polymers,which were essential to allow the elution of the immunosuppressive drug in the first DES designs.The introduction of erodable polymers in DES technology has provided the potential to complete the degradation of the polymer simultaneously or immediately after the release of the immunosuppressive drug,after which a BMS remains in place.Several DES designs with biodegradable(BIO)polymers have been introduced in preclinical and clinical studies, including randomized trials.In this review,we analyze the clinical results from 6 observational and randomized studies with BIO polymers and discuss advantages and disadvantages of this new technology.     

Stent thrombosis and drug-eluting stents

Coronary stents have been used for the treatment of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), and significantly improved procedural safety and are associated with a lower rate of restenosis compared with balloon angioplasty alone. Drug-eluting stents (DES) have been dominant for the treatment of CAD with efficacy in significantly reducing both restenosis and target lesion revascularization. However, late and very late stent thrombosis have become a major concern in DES-implanted arteries compared with those treated with bare-metal stents (BMS). This review focuses on the feature of DES thrombosis and pathological examination and dual antiplatelet therapy for prevention of stent thrombosis.Currently, the incidence of stent thrombosis associated with first-generation and second-generation DES remains unclear in data from real-world cohort registry studies. Further studies of larger multicenter trials would give us insight into the specific mechanisms of stent thrombosis among different generations of DES.     

Angiographic patterns of drug-eluting stent restenosis and one-year outcomes after treatment with repeated percutaneous coronary intervention

Patterns of in-stent restenosis (ISR) after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation and outcomes after treatment have not been studied systematically in all comers. We compared patterns of ISR and outcomes of repeated percutaneous coronary intervention in consecutive patients with DES-ISR. A total of 137 patients with 182 lesions underwent repeated percutaneous coronary intervention for DES-ISR at Columbia University Medical Center from August 2004 to April 2006. DES-ISR was treated with repeated DES placement in 84% of patients and balloon angioplasty in 16%. There was 1 stent thrombosis at 30 days, and at 1 year, major adverse cardiac events occurred in 10% of patients, driven primarily by an 8% rate of target-lesion revascularization. After exclusion of 12 patients with multiple ISR lesions, data were further analyzed from 125 patients with 152 DES-ISR lesions, of which 118 were originally treated with sirolimus-eluting stents and 34 were treated with paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES-ISR). Baseline features were well matched between the 2 groups, except that patients with PES-ISR were older. A focal pattern of ISR was observed in 69.5% of patients overall. However, patients originally treated with a PES had a significantly higher frequency of diffuse-intrastent ISR in comparison with sirolimus-eluting stent ISR (30.3% vs 13.6%, p = 0.03). In conclusion, the pattern of ISR in most DES-ISR in this unselected patient population was focal, with higher rates of diffuse intrastent restenosis seen with PES-ISR. Treatment with either repeated DES implantation or balloon angioplasty for DES-ISR was safe and associated with low overall rates of target-lesion revascularization and major adverse cardiac events at 1 year.     

Late Stent Thrombosis: The Last Remaining Obstacle in Coronary Interventional Therapy

Drug-eluting stents (DES) represent an outstanding improvement in the interventional cardiology field. DES have markedly decreased stent restenosis and the clinical need for repeat revascularization, without increasing mortality, compared to bare-metal stents (BMS). However, the widespread use of DES has raised concerns regarding the occurrence of late stent thrombosis (ST), beyond the traditional 1-month timeframe in which thrombotic events were found to occur after BMS implantation. While early ST (events occurring within 1?month after stent placement) has been shown to be similar between DES and BMS, late (events occurring after 1?month following stent implantation) and very late (events occurring more than 1?year following stent implantation) ST have emerged as distinct major pitfalls of DES implantation. In this review we describe the current knowledge regarding late and very late ST after DES implantation.     

In-stent neoatherosclerosis: a final common pathway of late stent failure

Percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting is the most widely performed procedure for the treatment of symptomatic coronary disease, and drug-eluting stents (DES) have minimized the limitations of bare-metal stents (BMS). Nevertheless, there remain serious concerns about late complications such as in-stent restenosis and late stent thrombosis. Although in-stent restenosis of BMS was considered as a stable condition with an early peak of intimal hyperplasia, followed by a regression period beyond 1 year, recent studies have reported that one-third of patients with in-stent restenosis of BMS presented with acute coronary syndrome that is not regarded as clinically benign. Furthermore, both clinical and histologic studies of DES have demonstrated evidence of continuous neointimal growth during long-term follow-up, which is designated as "late catch-up" phenomenon. Here, we present emerging evidence of de novo neoatherosclerosis based on histology, angioscopy, and intravascular images that provide a new insight for the mechanism of late stent failure. In-stent neoatherosclerosis is an important substrate for late stent failure for both BMS and DES, especially in the extended phase. In light of the rapid progression in DES, early detection of neoatherosclerosis may be beneficial to improving long-term outcome of patients with DES implants.     

Vascular Pathology of Drug-Eluting Stents

Polymer-based sirolimus- (Cypher) and paclitaxel-eluting stents (Taxus), so-called drug-eluting stents (DES), have become the treatment of choice for patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary revascularization (PCI). While these stents have reduced rates of restenosis and late lumen loss compared to bare-metal stents (BMS), late thrombosis, a life-threatening complication of this technology, has emerged as a major concern. Our understanding of the pathophysiology of late DES thrombosis is derived from animal and human pathologic samples taken after implantation of these devices. These data indicate that the DES cause substantial impairment in arterial healing characterized by lack of complete reendothelialization and persistence of fibrin when compared to BMS. This so-called delayed healing is "identified as" the primary substrate of an underlying cause of late DES thrombosis at autopsy. Several additional risk factors for late stent thrombosis include penetration of necrotic core, malapposition, overlapping stent placement, excessive stent length, and bifurcation lesions. These represent additional barriers to healing and should be avoided if DES are to be used in order to minimize the late thrombotic risks of these devices. Since the time course of complete healing with DES is unknown, the optimal duration of antiplatelet treatment remains to be determined.     

Treatment of in-stent restenosis with sirolimus-eluting-stents -- a six month clinical and angiographic follow-up

Summary Treatment of in-stent restenosis (ISR) remains a therapeutic challenge since many pharmacological and mechanical approaches have shown disappointing results except for brachytherapy. Drug-eluting stents (DES) have been reported to effectively reduce ISR in de novo lesions. We studied 55 consecutive patients with ISR in native coronary arteries and 7 with ISR in saphenous vein grafts (SVG) with elective indication for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), who underwent successful implantation with DES. No in-hospital postprocedural major adverse cardiac events were observed. All but one patient (n=61) underwent an angiographic follow-up at 183±30 days. Grade of stenosis was assessed by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) at index procedure and at control angiography. Restenosis (>50%) occurred in 5 patients (8.2%). Target vessel revascularization was performed in an additional 4 patients. Minimal intimal hyperplasia was observed in all segments covered by DES (late loss 0.08±0.37 mm, loss index 0.11±0.47). One patient suffered from subacute stent thrombosis due to discontinuation of clopidogrel medication. At six month follow-up two patients had died. Death was not related to a restenosis in the treated segment. Conclusion Our experiences with DES treatment of ISR lesions show good angiographic and clinical results at index procedure and at the 6 month follow-up with low sub acute thrombosis rate as compared with existing treatment modalities. Restenosis rate seems to be at least as low as reported for brachytherapy.      

Very late thrombosis of paclitaxel-eluting stent

Drug-eluting stents (DES) have been proven to be effective in reducing restenosis after percutaneous coronary interventions, but they are associated with a risk of late thrombotic occlusion with adverse clinical events. We report a case of an angiographically confirmed paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) thrombosis which occurred 36 months after successful stent implantation. To the best of our knowledge, this is the most delayed case of PES thrombosis described so far.