Evaluation of a commercial latex agglutination test for identification of Staphylococcus aureus.

A new, commercially available latex agglutination test (SeroSTAT Staph; Scott Laboratories, Inc., Fiskeville, R.I.) was compared with the tube coagulase and slide coagulase tests as means for identifying Staphylococcus aureus. Of 160 clinical isolates of S. aureus, 159 (99.4%) yielded positive results with the latex agglutination test. Negative latex agglutination test results were obtained with 266 of 267 clinical isolates of Micrococcus spp. and staphylococcal species other than S. aureus (99.6%). The latex agglutination test was found to be a rapid, technically nondemanding method for identifying S. aureus. It was as accurate as the tube coagulase test and more accurate than the slide coagulase test.     

Comparative evaluation of five agglutination techniques and a new miniaturized system for rapid identification of methicillin-resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus.

The speciation of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) poses a significant diagnostic problem when rapid identification methods such as slide agglutination tests, are used, because of the high proportion of false-negative reactions. 150 perfectly identified MRSA strains were tested on 5 commonly used agglutination reagents ("Bacto staph latex test", "Monostaph", "Pastorex staph", "Staphaurex", and "Staphyslide test") in comparison with a new micromethod ("RAPIDEC staph") which detects a type of staphylocoagulase within 2 hours by a fluorescence test. The "RAPIDEC staph" reagent enabled identification of all the MRSA while the agglutination tests gave poorer results: "Monostaph" correctly identified 64.6% of strains, "Staphyslide", 59.3%, "Bacto staph latex test", 44.6%, "Pastorex staph", 38.6% and "Staphaurex", 28.6%. These results show that agglutination slide tests are not reliable enough for the identification of MRSA which are more and more encountered in hospital wards. The authors recommend not to use slide agglutination methods. They suggest the tube test for coagulase which is the reference technique, although it is time-consuming and not well standardized. The results of this evaluation encourage the use of the "RAPIDEC staph" reagent since it is an easy-to-use, reliable technique for the rapid identification of Staphylococcus aureus.     

Direct identification of Staphylococcus aureus in blood culture fluid with a commercial latex agglutination test.

A commercial latex agglutination slide test (SeroSTAT Staph, Scott Laboratories, Inc., Fiskeville, R.I.) accurately identified Staphylococcus aureus when applied directly to blood culture fluid containing staphylococci. This latex agglutination test exhibited 100% accuracy when 30 seeded aerobic and anaerobic radiometric blood cultures (15 strains of S. aureus, 15 strains of other staphylococcal species) were tested blindly. In 36 actual clinical specimens yielding 16 isolates of S. aureus and 20 isolates of Staphylococcus epidermidis, 94.4% accuracy was achieved. The latex agglutination test provided positive test results before objective criteria of blood culture positivity such as radiometric growth indices and Gram stains became positive.     

Evaluation of three commercial agglutination tests for the identification of Staphylococcus aureus.

Three commercially available rapid slide agglutination tests for the identification of Staphylococcus aureus were evaluated with 354 recent clinical isolates (165 strains of S. aureus). The test results of two latex agglutination products, SeroSTAT Staph (Scott Laboratories, Inc.) and Staphylatex (American Micro Scan), and one hemagglutination product, Staphyloslide (BBL Microbiology Systems), were compared with the results of the tube coagulase test, which was read at 4 h (4-h tube coagulase test) and, if negative, again after overnight incubation at room temperature (24-h tube coagulase test). Discrepancies between agglutination and tube coagulase identifications were resolved by use of the thermonuclease, mannitol fermentation, and slide coagulase tests. All sensitivities, specificities, predictive values of a positive result, and predictive values of a negative result for the three agglutination tests were at least 98.8% and comparable with the 4-h tube coagulase test. Best results were obtained with the 24-h tube coagulase test, which yielded one false-negative and no false-positive tests. Agglutination identifications may be performed on organisms taken directly from a primary plate when sufficient growth is present. Kit agglutination procedures yield rapid and reliable identifications and are easy to perform. This study also demonstrates the usefulness of the 24-h tube coagulase test.     

Comparison of a yellow latex reagent with other agglutination methods for the identification of Staphylococcus aureus.

A new commercial yellow latex agglutination reagent (Bacto-Staph) was compared with the slide and tube coagulase tests and three other commercial reagents for the identification of 283 Staphylococcus aureus and 54 non-S. aureus staphylococcal strains. Test sensitivities for the identification of S. aureus were as follows: tube coagulase, 99.6%; slide coagulase, 98.6%; Bacto-Staph, 99.6%; Staphylatex, 98.6%; Sero STAT Staph, 98.2%; and Staphyloslide, 97.5%. No false-positive reactions were observed with any of the commercial reagents.     

Coagulase production by strains of Staphylococcus aureus of differing resistance characters: a comparison of two traditional methods with a latex agglutination system detecting both clumping factor and protein A.

Five groups of strains of Staphylococcus aureus (54 in total) were tested by slide and tube coagulase methods with rabbit and human plasma, and the results were compared with a latex test for both clumping factor and Protein A (Staphaurex, Wellcome Foundation). The five groups comprised: epidemic methicillin resistant S aureus (group 1); other methicillin resistant S aureus (group 2); other resistant S aureus (group 3); other S aureus (group 4); and a group of reference strains, not all true S aureus (group 5). Groups 1, 3, and 4 gave consistently strong positive results with the tube test and the latex test and less strong positive results with the slide test. Group 2 strains sometimes gave weak or negative results in slide and latex tests, but tube tests with both types of plasma were strongly positive. Only within group 5 strains were negative results in the tube test found. Group 1 strains showed no diminution in expression of free coagulase or of clumping factor. The latex test was more sensitive than the slide test but less sensitive than the tube test. Doubtful or negative slide test or latex test results, particularly with strains resistant to methicillin, should be checked by a tube coagulase test.     

Methods for serotyping nasopharyngeal isolates of Haemophilus influenzae: slide agglutination, Quellung reaction, countercurrent immunoelectrophoresis, latex agglutination, and antiserum agar.

Nasopharyngeal isolates of H. influenzae were typed by the slide agglutination test, the Quelling reaction, the latex agglutination test, countercurrent immunoelectrophoresis, and the antiserum agar test. These tests gave essentially comparable results, with countercurrent immunoelectrophoresis and latex agglutination being slightly more sensitive. Cross-reactive problems encountered with latex agglutination and the expense of performing countercurrent immunoelectrophoresis or the antiserum agar test made these tests less practical than the slide agglutination test to identify single strains that were already isolated. The Quellung reaction and slide agglutination were the most rapid tests used to type an organism. For mass screening of multiple samples, countercurrent immunoelectrophoresis was the simplest technique. The antiserum agar test was slow but was the best technique to screen nasopharyngeal swab cultures to identify the presence of any encapsulated strains in the mixed flora. Whether any of the above techniques were as sensitive as the immunofluorescence test was not evaluated in this study.     

Rapid and reliable identification of Staphylococcus aureus by a latex agglutination test

A latex slide agglutination test detecting clumping factor and protein A simultaneously is recommended for rapid and reliable routine identification of Staphylococcus aureus. Strains (836) of staphylococci isolated from clinical specimens were examined, all S. aureus strains identified by conventional methods were correctly differentiated by the latex test, and no false-positive results occurred with other staphylococci. The reagent is easy to prepare since plasma is the coating material.     

Reliability of latex agglutination tests for identification of Staphylococcus aureus resistant to oxacillin.

Commercial latex agglutination tests (LATs) for the simultaneous detection of clumping factor and protein A are gaining increased acceptance as a means of identifying Staphylococcus aureus. We evaluated two LATs (Accu-Staph; Carr-Scarborough, Decatur, Ga.; Staphaurex; Wellcome, Dartford, England) with particular emphasis on their ability to correctly identify oxacillin-resistant S. aureus. We tested 59 oxacillin-resistant S. aureus, 136 oxacillin-susceptible S. aureus, and 92 coagulase-negative staphylococcal strains with the two LATs and with thermonuclease, slide clumping factor, tube coagulase, and protein A hemagglutination tests. Clumping factor and protein A were present in 96.9 and 82.1% of our S. aureus strains, respectively. Accu-Staph correctly identified 92.8% and Staphaurex correctly identified 91.3% of S. aureus strains. No significant difference in LAT positivity rates, presence of clumping factor, or presence of protein A was found between oxacillin-resistant and -susceptible S. aureus. Overall, there were 31 false-negative LATs for 20 S. aureus strains, 14 with Accu-Staph and 17 with Staphaurex. Ninety-five percent of these strains possessed either clumping factor or protein A or both when these factors were determined independently. There were five false-positive LATs for four strains of coagulase-negative staphylococci (three Staphylococcus epidermidis and one Staphylococcus warneri), four with Accu-Staph and one with Staphaurex. Clumping factor was present in one S. warneri strain. Thus, the specificities of Accu-Staph, Staphaurex, and the clumping factor test were 95.6, 98.9, and 98.9%, respectively. Our results indicated that LATs identify oxacillin-resistant and -susceptible S. aureus equally well; however, they offer no greater sensitivity or specificity than the clumping factor test for identification of S. aureus.     

Performance of four slide agglutination methods for identification of Staphylococcus aureus when testing methicillin-resistant staphylococci.

Four commercially available slide agglutination systems for identifying Staphylococcus aureus were compared with the conventional slide (clumping factor) and tube coagulase tests. The systems evaluated included Bacto Staph Latex (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, Mich.), Staphyloslide (BBL Microbiology Systems, Cockeysville, Md.), Mini ID Accu-Staph (Carr-Scarborough Microbiologicals, Inc., Decatur, Ga.), and Staphaurex (Wellcome Diagnostics, Research Triangle Park, N.C.). A total of 338 clinical isolates, including methicillin-resistant S. aureus (n = 149), methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (n = 78), methicillin-resistant, coagulase-negative staphylococci (n = 45), and methicillin-susceptible, coagulase-negative staphylococci (n = 66), were tested by each method. The slide test for clumping factor, the 4-h tube coagulase test, Bacto Staph Latex, Staphyloslide, Mini ID Accu-Staph, and Staphaurex detected 212 (93.4%), 218 (96%), 223 (98.2%), 223 (98.2%), 221 (97.4%), and 224 (98.7%) of the S. aureus (44% methicillin-resistant) isolates, respectively. There were no false-positive results with any of the methods when the 111 strains of coagulase-negative staphylococci were tested. The results of this evaluation suggest that the four slide identification methods tested can provide rapid and accurate identification of methicillin-resistant S. aureus strains.     

A comparison of tests for thyroglobulin antibody

A comparison is made of tests for thyroglobulin antibody, using gel diffusion, electroprecipitin, bentonite flocculation, tanned red cell agglutination, and latex slide agglutination techniques on sera from cases of Hashimoto's disease and other thyroid disorders. Any increase in γ globulin was also noted from the serum electrophoretic pattern. The gel diffusion and electroprecipitin tests are shown to be comparable in their sensitivity, as are the bentonite flocculation and tanned red cell agglutination tests. The flocculation and agglutination tests were oversensitive. The latex slide test in conjunction with the electro-precipitin test is recommended for routine use in the detection of Hashimoto's disease.     

Evaluation of rapid coagulase methods for the identification of Staphylococcus aureus.

Four rapid latex agglutination assays, StaphAurex (Wellcome Diagnostics, Research Triangle Park, N.C.), Bacto Staph (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, Mich.), SeroSTAT (Scott Laboratories, Inc., Fiskeville, R.I.), Veri-Staph (Zeus Technologies, Raritan, N.J.), and two hemagglutination tests, Staphyloslide (BBL Microbiology Systems, Cockeysville, Md.) and Hemastaph (Remel, Lenexa, Kans.), were compared with the conventional slide coagulase, tube coagulase (TC), and thermonuclease (TNase) tests for the identification of Staphylococcus aureus. A total of 118 clinical isolates of S. aureus (52 methicillin resistant), 50 S. epidermidis, 5 S. capitis, 2 S. hominis, 3 S. simulans, 6 S. saprophyticus, and 2 S. warneri were tested. The slide coagulase, TC and TNase tests detected 115 (97.5%), 117 (99.2%), and 118 (100%) of the S. aureus isolates, respectively. All showed 100% specificity. The StaphAurex, Veri-Staph, Staphyloslide, Hemastaph, SeroSTAT, and Bacto Staph assays correctly identified 117 (99.2%), 117 (99.2%), 116 (98.3%), 110 (93.2%), 108 (91.5%), and 107 (90.7%) of the S. aureus isolates, respectively. For methicillin-resistant S. aureus isolates, StaphAurex, Veri-Staph, Staphyloslide, Hemastaph, SeroSTAT, and Bacto Staph showed 1 (2%), 1 (2%), 2 (4%), 7 (13.5%), 7 (13.5%), and 8 (15.4%) false-negative results, respectively. All the commercial agglutination assays demonstrated false-positive results with strains of S. capitis, S. saprophyticus and S. warneri. The overall accuracy of the commercial agglutination assays compared with TC and TNase ranged from 90.7 to 99.2%. We recommend that negative reactions with the rapid commercial test kits for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus isolates be confirmed with the TC or TNase test.     

A new slide latex agglutination test for the diagnosis of acute Candida vaginitis

Two hundred two slide latex agglutination (SLA) tests were performed on 137 women attending a vaginitis clinic to evaluate the efficacy of this new test in diagnosing acute symptomatic Candida vaginitis. In 77 patients with acute Candida vaginitis, the SLA test revealed a positive reaction in 56 patients, reflecting a sensitivity of 72.7%, lower than that observed with the 10% potassium hydroxide microscopic examination (sensitivity 90%). False negative SLA reactions could not be accounted for by lower numbers of yeast cultured from the vagina or by the presence of nonalbicans strains of Candida. Following successful antimycotic therapy, the SLA test promptly became negative in all mycologically negative patients. Application of the SLA test in asymptomatic healthy control women revealed extremely few false positive reactions for Candida (5.6%). This easily performed and rapid slide latex agglutination test should provide a useful adjunct to the diagnosis of Candida vaginitis, but only for physicians who do not routinely perform microscopy on vaginal secretions.     

Identification of Salmonella O antigens by coagglutination

This study concerns the preparation of reagents for identifying the somatic O antigens of Salmonella enteritidis. Coagglutination reagents (COAGs) with antibody fixed to killed and stabilized protein A-bearing staphylococci were prepared with antisera which were used for identifying the somatic O antigens of S. enteritidis by the slide agglutination test. The reactions of the COAGs were compared with those obtained with the grouping antisera in routine slide agglutination tests in which 41 or more serologically different Salmonella strains, representing most of the known groups, were used. One-third of the COAGs gave identical reactions to those of the slide agglutination antisera. The reactions of the other COAGs varied from the slide agglutination antisera results, some by many reactions and others by only a few. The coagglutination procedure was more reactive than the routine slide agglutination test and resulted in cross-reactions which were not observed in the original grouping antisera. More COAGs were specific when they were tested with alcohol-treated cultures than with live cultures. Coagglutination conserves antiserum, allowing about 12 times as many tests for a given volume of group-specific glycerolized antiserum as does the slide agglutination method.     

Rapid Detection of Methicillin Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus Isolates by the MRSA-Screen Latex Agglutination Test

The slide agglutination test MRSA-Screen (Denka Seiken Co., Niigata, Japan) was compared with the mecA PCR ("gold standard") for the detection of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. The MRSA-Screen test detected the penicillin-binding protein 2a (PBP2a) antigen in 87 of 90 genetically diverse methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) stock culture strains, leading to a sensitivity of 97%. The three discrepant MRSA strains displayed positive results only after induction of the mecA gene by exposure to methicillin. Both mecA PCR and MRSA-Screen displayed negative results among the methicillin-susceptible S. aureus strains (n = 106), as well as for Micrococcus spp. (n = 10), members of the family Enterobacteriaceae (n = 10), Streptococcus pneumoniae (n = 10), and Enterococcus spp. (n = 10) (specificity = 100%). Producing the same PBP2a antigen, all 10 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis strains score positived in both the latex test and the mecA PCR. Consequently, the MRSA-Screen test should be applied only after identification of the MRSA strain to the species level to rule out coagulase-negative staphylococci. In conclusion, due to excellent specificity and sensitivity the MRSA-Screen latex test has the potential to be successfully used for routine applications in the microbiology laboratory.     

Coagulase-negative staphylococci: comparison of phenotypic and genotypic oxacillin susceptibility tests and evaluation of the agar screening test by using different concentrations of oxacillin

This study evaluated the oxacillin susceptibilities of 152 coagulase-negative staphylococcal (CoNS) strains of 12 species by disk diffusion; agar dilution; E-test; the slide latex agglutination test (Slidex MRSA Detection test; bioMérieux S/A, Paris, France); the agar screening test with 1, 2, 4, or 6 microg of oxacillin per ml and incubation for 24 or 48 h; and detection of the mecA gene by PCR. The results revealed that the agar screening test with 4 micro g of oxacillin per ml and incubation for 48 h was superior to any single phenotype-based susceptibility assay, presenting a sensitivity and a specificity of 100% each. For the different methods evaluated, the sensitivities and specificities were as follows: for disk diffusion, 94.2 and 91.8%, respectively; for the agar dilution test 100 and 73.5%, respectively; for E-test, 100 and 71.4%, respectively; and for the slide latex agglutination test, 97.1 and 98%, respectively. A good correlation was observed between oxacillin susceptibility testing results and PCR results for Staphylococcus epidermidis, S. haemolyticus, S. hominis subsp. hominis, and all mecA-positive strains. However, at least 60% of the mecA-negative isolates of the species S. saprophyticus, S. cohnii subsp. urealyticum, S. lugdunensis, and S. sciuri were erroneously classified as oxacillin resistant by the agar dilution test. Conversely, the slide latex agglutination test presented a high sensitivity (97.1%) and a high specificity (98%) for all CoNS species. Our results demonstrated the accuracy of the agar screening test with 4 micro g of oxacillin per ml and incubation for 48 h and the slide latex agglutination test for the appropriate detection of the oxacillin susceptibilities of CoNS isolates. Both assays are technically simple and can be easier to perform in routine laboratories than PCR.     

Evaluation of various rapid agglutination methods for the identification of Staphylococcus aureus

A latex agglutination test (SeroSTAT Staph; Scott Laboratories, Fiskeville, R.I.) and two hemagglutination tests (Staphyloslide; BBL Microbiology Systems, Cockeysville, Md.; and Hemastaph; Remel, Lenexa, Kans.) were compared with the slide coagulase (SC) and tube coagulase (TC) tests at room temperature (22 to 25 degrees C) and at 37 degrees C for the rapid identification of Staphylococcus aureus. A total of 380 clinical strains of staphylococci were tested. The TC test performed at room temperature yielded the largest number of TC-positive results (n = 239), and based on this observation 239 organisms were classified as S. aureus and 141 were classified as non-S. aureus. The SC, TC (37 degrees C), SeroSTAT Staph, Staphyloslide, and Hemastaph tests correctly identified 210 (87.9%), 221 (92.5%), 238 (99.6%), 239 (100%), and 236 (98.7%) of the S. aureus isolates, respectively. Of the S. aureus isolates that were TC positive at room temperature 68% required 24 h of incubation before coagulase production was detected. There was one false-negative SeroSTAT Staph result and one false-negative Hemastaph result. The Staphyloslide test yielded two noninterpretable results (both organisms were later confirmed as non-S. aureus), whereas there were six noninterpretable results recorded with the Hemastaph test (four organisms were classified as non-S. aureus, and two were classified as S. aureus). The SeroSTAT Staph, Staphyloslide, and Hemastaph tests were all more sensitive than the conventional SC and TC (37 degrees C) tests and were considerably more rapid than the TC test at either temperature.     

Rapid diagnosis of vaginal candidosis by latex particle agglutination.

Vaginal swabs from women who on clinical evidence were thought to have vaginal candidosis were examined for yeasts by conventional laboratory methods (microscopy and culture) and also assayed for Candida antigens using a rapid (3 min) slide latex particle agglutination tests. Results showed that a diagnosis of vaginal candidosis based on clinical criteria alone is unreliable: only half of the women were subsequently confirmed as having candidosis by microscopy and culture. The new slide latex particle agglutination test gave better results, with 100% specificity, 80% sensitivity, high predictive values (greater than or equal to 91%), and an overall diagnostic efficiency of 93%. From the results of this preliminary study, slide latex particle agglutination looks a promising, rapid alternative to conventional laboratory methods for confirming a clinical diagnosis of vaginal candidosis and has the considerable advantage that it can be conveniently used in a clinical setting.     

Detection of staphylococcal exfoliative toxin by slide latex agglutination.

A simple and rapid method in which slide latex agglutination was used was developed to detect the exfoliative toxin (ET) elaborated by clinical isolates. ET types A and B (ET-A and ET-B) were purified by plate gel isoelectrofocusing, and anti-ET sera were obtained by immunizing rabbits. A specific immunoglobulin G antitoxin was then prepared from the immunized rabbit sera by fast protein liquid chromatography, and latex particles were coated with the antitoxin. Of 74 staphylococcal strains isolated from patients with staphylococcal scalded skin syndrome, 61 strains were found to produce ET by the newborn mouse bioassay. All 61 strains were shown to be positive for ET-A and ET-B production by the slide latex agglutination method. The lowest concentration of ETs detected by the latex agglutination method was 0.5 microgram/ml, which was much lower than that detected by the double immunodiffusion method, with a sensitivity of 50 micrograms/ml. It is crucial to prove ET production by clinical isolates for the diagnosis and surveillance of staphylococcal scalded skin syndrome. The latex agglutination method is a sensitive, simple, and rapid test which can be used as an alternative to the newborn mouse bioassay.     

Evaluation of commercial antisera for Shigella serogrouping.

Shigella serogrouping antisera from six companies (Becton Dickinson, Denka, Difco, Murex, Roach, and Sanofi-Pasteur) intended for the slide agglutination test and those of the Wellcolex Colour Shigella latex agglutination test were evaluated to identify quality products for Shigella identification. Forty-six reference Shigella strains (one for each serotype and species), 50 clinical strains (21 S. flexneri, 21 S. sonnei, 4 S. dysenteriae, 4 S. boydii) representing the most prevalent species and serotypes encountered in Quebec, and 9 non-Shigella strains were tested according to the manufacturers' instructions. A 3+ reaction (> or = 75% agglutination) was considered positive for the slide agglutination tests. Sensitivity varied from 47% (Roach) to 94% (Difco). For the 105 strains tested, accuracy ranged from 53% (Roach) to 91% (Wellcolex). Specificity varied from 97 to 100% for group A antisera, from 96 to 100% for group B antisera, from 88 to 100% for group C antisera, and from 95 to 99% for group D antisera. The costs of reagents required to test one strain varied from $3.50 to $13.20 (in Canadian dollars). In conclusion, Roach reagents proved to be unsatisfactory for Shigella serogrouping. Among those from the remaining companies, the Denka, Difco, and Wellcolex reagents met a performance standard of 90% accuracy.