Variability in extent of platelet function inhibition after administration of optimal dose of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blockers in patients undergoing a high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention

The Ultegra Rapid Platelet Function Assay was used to measure the inhibition of platelet aggregation at baseline and 10 minutes and 8 hours after starting therapy in 114 patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention with the planned use of a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor. The abciximab-treated patients received a 0.25 mg/kg bolus, followed by a 0.125 microg/kg/min infusion for 12 hours; the eptifibatide-treated patients received 2 boluses of 180 microg/kg administered 10 minutes apart, followed by a 2 microg/kg/min infusion for 24 hours; the tirofiban-treated patients received a 25 microg/kg bolus, followed by a 0.15 microg/kg/min infusion for 18 hours. Ten minutes after starting therapy, the mean level of platelet inhibition was 86 +/- 9% for abciximab, 92 +/- 6% for eptifibatide, and 95 +/- 5% for tirofiban (p <0.001); > or =95% platelet inhibition was achieved in 29% of the patients treated with abciximab, 44% of those receiving eptifibatide, and 68% of the those receiving tirofiban (p = 0.02). In conclusion, at the evaluated doses, tirofiban seemed to be the most effective drug in achieving "optimal" platelet inhibition very early after percutaneous coronary intervention.     

A comparative study of light transmission aggregometry and automated bedside platelet function assays in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and receiving abciximab, eptifibatide, or tirofiban.

Platelet inhibition is central to the efficacy of glycoprotein (GP) IIb-IIIa antagonist therapy, but is not routinely measured during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Data directly comparing the antiplatelet effects of these agents are also limited. Therefore, we compared ex vivo platelet function by standard light transmission aggregometry (LTA) and two automated bedside platelet function assays in 36 patients undergoing PCI with GP IIb-IIIa inhibitors. At baseline and 10 min following clinically recommended bolus and infusion of abciximab (0.25 mg/kg, 0.125 microg/kg/min), eptifibatide (180 microg/kg, 2 microg/kg/min), or tirofiban (10 microg/kg, 0.1 microg/kg/min), we measured 20 microM ADP- and 1.9 mg/mL collagen-induced platelet aggregation using LTA. Platelet function was also assessed using the bedside Accumetrics Ultegra-Rapid Platelet Function Assay (RPFA) and the Xylum Clot Signature Analyzer (CSA). The degree of platelet inhibition, as assessed by LTA, varied significantly between the clinically recommended doses of these GP IIb-IIIa antagonists. RPFA measurements agreed closely with LTA for abciximab, but tended to overestimate the degree of platelet inhibition for small molecules. CSA demonstrated profoundly inhibited shear-induced platelet function, but lacked sensitivity to discriminate between agents. These findings may have implications for the results of trials comparing the efficacy of these agents in patients undergoing PCI.     

Pharmacodynamics of two different dosing regimens of tirofiban in citrate or PPACK anticoagulated blood

The primary objective of this study was to compare the inhibitory activity of tirofiban measured with the rapid platelet function assay (RPFA) and with light transmission aggregometry using two different anticoagulants (citrate versus PPACK). Twenty patients treated with tirofiban for percutaneous coronary intervention were studied at six time points during tirofiban treatment. Tirofiban was given with a bolus dose of 10 microg/kg and an infusion of 0.10 microg/kg per min (10 patients) or with a bolus dose of 15 microg/kg and an infusion of 0.15 microg/kg per min (10 patients). Inhibition of platelet function appeared highest using citrated blood and the RPFA-device and lowest when assessed by aggregometry in PPACK-anticoagulated blood. Only the higher dose of tirofiban achieved an inhibition of platelet aggregation of at least 80% in all test systems.     

Clinical pharmacology of higher dose eptifibatide in percutaneous coronary intervention (the PRIDE study).

This study describes the dose-exploration phase of the PRIDE trial, an investigation of the clinical pharmacology of higher dose eptifibatide in patients who underwent elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Outcomes of treatment with the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors were dependent upon proper dosing selection. In this multicenter, placebo-controlled clinical study, 127 patients were randomized 1:1:2:2 into 1 of the following treatment groups: placebo; eptifibatide as a 135 microg/kg bolus followed by a 0.75 microg/kg/min infusion; eptifibatide as a 180 microg/kg bolus with a 2.0 microg/kg/min infusion; or eptifibatide as a 250 microg/kg bolus with a 3.0 microg/kg/min infusion. Light transmission aggregometry was used to determine platelet aggregation in response to 20 microM adenosine diphosphate, and platelet receptor occupancy was also determined. Eptifibatide exhibited linear pharmacokinetics over the dose range studied. Inhibition of platelet aggregation was greater in samples collected in sodium citrate compared with those collected in D-phenylalanyl-L-prolyl-L-arginine chloromethyl ketone. The 180/2.0 dosing regimen achieved 90% inhibition of platelet aggregation immediately (5 minutes) and at steady state (8 to 24 hours). At 1 hour, mean inhibition of platelet aggregation was 80%. Eptifibatide exhibited dose-dependent pharmacodynamics that were dependent upon choice of anticoagulant. A 180 microg/kg bolus followed by a 2.0 microg/kg/min infusion at steady state achieved >80% inhibition of platelet aggregation. With the single-bolus regimen, however, there was an early loss of the inhibition of platelet aggregation before steady state was reached. Additional dose-exploration studies may further optimize eptifibatide dosing.     

Pharmacodynamics of two different dosing regimens of tirofiban in citrate or PPACK anticoagulated blood

The primary objective of this study was to compare the inhibitory activity of tirofiban measured with the rapid platelet function assay (RPFA) and with light transmission aggregometry using two different anticoagulants (citrate versus PPACK). Twenty patients treated with tirofiban for percutaneous coronary intervention were studied at six time points during tirofiban treatment. Tirofiban was given with a bolus dose of 10?µg/kg and an infusion of 0.10?µg/kg per min (10 patients) or with a bolus dose of 15?µg/kg and an infusion of 0.15?µg/kg per min (10 patients). Inhibition of platelet function appeared highest using citrated blood and the RPFA-device and lowest when assessed by aggregometry in PPACK-anticoagulated blood. Only the higher dose of tirofiban achieved an inhibition of platelet aggregation of at least 80% in all test systems.     

Comparison of GP IIB/IIIA Inhibitors and Their Activity as Measured by Aggregometry, Flow Cytometry, Single Platelet Counting, and the Rapid Platelet Function Analyzer

Background: GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors have primarily been used short-term e.g., during PTCA. They failed to show clinical benefit during long-term therapy. One reason might be the absence of a method to monitor inhibitor activity. This study compared platelet aggregometry, the rapid platelet function analyzer (RPFA) test, single platelet counting, and flow cytometric determination of receptor occupancy to measure GP IIb/IIIa-receptor inhibitor activity. Methods: Increasing doses of abciximab, tirofiban, and eptifibatide were added to whole blood in vitro. Whole blood was used for the RPFA, for single platelet counting and flow cytometry. Platelet rich plasma was prepared for aggregometry. Results: The correlation between aggregometry and RPFA results was linear for abciximab and eptifibatide. Tirofiban was a stronger inhibitor with the RPFA (IC₅₀ 7.7[emsp4 ]nM) than with aggregometry (IC₅₀ 19.6[emsp4 ]nM). The single platelet counting technique showed that even supratherapeutic concentrations of all three inhibitors could not completely suppress microaggregation. Abciximab concentrations that were equipotent to tirofiban with aggregometry were less potent with regards to the inhibition of microaggregation. This difference was more pronounced with TRAP induced microaggregation than with ADP. The flow cytometric receptor occupancy test showed that occupancy was 95[emsp4 ]% with 5[emsp4 ]g/ml abciximab and almost 97[emsp4 ]% with 10[emsp4 ]g/ml. Tirofiban reached a maximum receptor occupancy of 56[emsp4 ]%, eptifibatide 64[emsp4 ]%. Conclusions: While aggregometry is time consuming the RPFA provides results fast and with little variability. There is still a discrepancy between aggregometry and RPFA results for tirofiban. The single platelet counting technique detects the inhibition of microaggregation the relevance of which for the clinical outcome is not known. The flow cytometric receptor occupancy assay is best suited for abciximab.     

Platelet inhibition with tirofiban early during percutaneous coronary intervention: dosing revisited.

Platelet inhibition is central to the efficacy of the intravenous glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors. Differences in the degree of platelet inhibition achieved with these agents may account for the disparity in clinical efficacy noted in recently completed clinical trials. The purpose of this study was to evaluate ex vivo platelet inhibition with tirofiban in patients admitted with acute coronary syndrome and who were referred for percutaneous coronary interventions. Twenty-five patients were studied. Ten patients received tirofiban 10 microg/kg bolus and 0.15 microg/kg infusion for 16 hr. Platelet inhibition was determined at 5, 15, 30, 45, 60, and 120 min after tirofiban, by light transmission aggregometry (LTA), rapid platelet function assay (RPFA), and platelet works (PW). The average platelet inhibition using RPFA with PPACK, was 87% at 5 min, then decreased to a nadir of 72% at 30 min and recovered back to > 80% at 60 min and onward. Similar trends were noted with RPFA-citrate, PW, and LTA. Ca-chelating anticoagulants (EDTA and citrate) overestimated platelet inhibition at all time points. Dose adjustment was done by increasing the bolus (15 microg/kg) in five patients, increasing the maintenance dose (0.2 microg/kg/min) in five patients, and increasing both the bolus and the maintenance dose in another five patients. Platelet inhibition tested by all the above methods was consistently over 90% when both the bolus and maintenance doses were increased. No increased incidence of major bleeding was noted at this adjusted dose. The current dosing of tirofiban may be inadequate to achieve appropriate platelet inhibition during PCI in patients admitted with acute coronary syndrome and receiving tirofiban immediately before the procedure in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. Dose adjustment may be needed to maximize platelet inhibition early during PCI.     

Time course, magnitude, and consistency of platelet inhibition by abciximab, tirofiban, or eptifibatide in patients with unstable angina pectoris undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Adjunctive platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) reduces platelet-mediated adverse ischemic outcomes. Although abciximab, eptifibatide, and tirofiban have received U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval for use, these agents differ in their pharmacodynamic profiles. Each of these agents has been compared in randomized trials with placebo for patients undergoing PCI, but no randomized comparative studies of these agents have been performed. We compared ex vivo platelet function by both standard light transmission aggregometry and rapid platelet function assay during and after administration of abciximab, eptifibatide, or tirofiban in approved dose regimens on a randomized basis at the time of PCI in patients with unstable angina pectoris. A reduced intensity of platelet inhibition by light transmission aggregometry was observed for tirofiban compared with either eptifibatide or abciximab. In addition, the 30-minute bolus strategy used for tirofiban was associated with delayed onset of maximal platelet inhibition relative to the initiation of bolus infusion. Whether the trends in platelet function observed in this study will be translated into differences in clinical outcomes awaits definition by larger scale randomized clinical trials comparing these platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors.     

Pharmacodynamic and clinical trials of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors and potential relationship of results to dosing

Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors have become the standard of care for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and for those presenting with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTE-ACS). Clinical effects of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors in PCI and NSTE-ACS strongly correlate with potency, consistency, and durability of platelet aggregation inhibition. Under standardized conditions [light transmission aggregometry (LTA), 20 micromol adenosine diphosphate (ADP) as an agonist, and D-phenylalanyl-L-propyl-L-arginine chloromethyl ketone (PPACK) as an anticoagulant], we demand consistent platelet aggregation inhibition >80% during the time of PCI (initial balloon inflation), and during the entire duration of therapy in NSTE-ACS. The benefit of abciximab (bolus 0.25 mg/kg plus infusion 10 microg/kg/min) correlates with >80% inhibition of platelet aggregation during the intervention (PCI) and immediately thereafter (<6 hours). The absence of a benefit with abciximab in NSTE-ACS is most likely due to <80% inhibition during the major part of the infusion period (>6 hours). Tirofiban does not achieve >80% inhibition at the time of PCI at a dose of 10 microg/kg bolus plus 0.15 microg/kg/min infusion, and at a dose of 0.4 lg/kg/min loading infusion for 30 minutes plus 0.1 microg/kg/min maintenance infusion, the target value is only reached after 18 h. Eptifibatide (double-bolus 180 microg/kg 10 min apart, followed immediately by a 2.0 microg/kg/min infusion) provided an instant, consistent, and durable antiplatelet effect for the entire duration of infusion, and a significant clinical benefit in both PCI (non-ACS patients) and medically managed NSTE-ACS patients.     

Platelet function after a high dose bolus of tirofiban immediately after coronary angioplasty

In the TARGET trial, the lower incidence of cardiac events at one month with abciximab compared with tirofiban was attributed to a lack of efficacy in the first hour because of suboptimal dosage. The object of this study was to confirm that high dose tirofibal is associated with over 90% platelet inhibition during the first hour and to analyse the effect of this new dosage on platelet activation. Thirty-three patients treated with clopidogrel and aspirin for an acute coronary syndrome without ST elevation were given before angioplasty a bolus of 25 microg/Kg of tirofiban injected in 3 minutes, followed by an infusion of 0.15 microg/kg/min. Blood samples were taken before the treatment (TO) and at the 45th minute (T1) to measure platelet aggregation induced by ADP, the expression of P-selection, the quantification of circulating monocyte-platelet aggregates and the phospholyration of VASP protein. The results showed that all patients had over 90% (100%) inhibition of platelet aggregation at T1. The expression of P-selection was significantly reduced (T0: 0.195 +/- 0.057 MFI; T1: 0.186 +/- 0.055 MFI, p = 0.03). There was no significant difference in the number of monocyte-platelet aggregates or in the phosphorylation of VASP. In conclusion, a bolus of 25 microg/Kg/3 min of tirofiban provides over 90% inhibition of platelet aggregation in the first hour. The initial platelet proactivator effect at this dosage was shown to have disappeared with an inhibition of platelet activation.     

Safety of a high bolus dose of tirofiban in patients undergoing coronary stent placement.

To overcome the suboptimal platelet inhibition induced by tirofiban in the first hour after a percutaneous coronary intervention, a new regimen of 25 microg/kg bolus followed by an 18-hr infusion of 0.15 microg/kg/min has been proposed. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of this high bolus dose of tirofiban with those of abciximab on bleeding risk and 30-day clinical outcome in patients undergoing coronary stenting. We compared two cohorts of patients who underwent coronary stent placement between January 2000 and December 2002. In the first cohort, the only available IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitor was abciximab, which was given to 280 (34.9%) out of 802 stented patients; in the second cohort, tirofiban was administered to 274 (38.3%) out of 716 treated patients. The primary endpoints were the proportion of patients with major bleeding and the rate of site access complications; the 30-day incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) was also assessed. After the procedure, the patients were given ticlopidine for 4 weeks and aspirin indefinitely. Major bleeding episodes were observed in four patients receiving abciximab and in none receiving tirofiban (1.4% vs. 0%; P = 0.12); the rates of site access complications were similar (3.6% vs. 3.3%; P = 0.96). The 30-day incidence of MACE was 7.1% in the abciximab group and 5.8% in the tirofiban group (P = 0.65). In patients undergoing coronary stenting, the high bolus dose of tirofiban is safe and not associated with an increased risk of major bleeding or site access complications in comparison with abciximab.     

Abciximab Pharmacodynamics Are Unaffected by Antecedent Therapy with Other GPIIb/IIIa Antagonists in Non-Human Primates

Background: Tirofiban and eptifibatide are currently approved for the medical stabilization of non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. In patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) during infusion of these drugs, conversion to abciximab, which has long term proven clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness, following PCI may be desirable. The purpose of this study was to determine if the binding or pharmacodynamics of abciximab is affected by a prior infusion of either tirofiban or eptifibatide. Methods: In vitro binding experiments were performed to determine if prior exposure to tirofiban or eptifibatide altered the affinity and extent of binding of abciximab to GPIIb/IIIa. For in vivo experiments, cynomolgus monkeys were pretreated with a bolus and 18 hour infusion of saline, tirofiban, or eptifibatide. At the end of the initial treatment, a bolus and 12 hr infusion of abciximab was started without delay. Inhibition of platelet aggregation, GPIIb/IIIa receptor blockade and abciximab pharmacokinetics were measured during and after both infusions. Results: Equilibrium binding of abciximab in vitro was unaffected by tirofiban or eptifibatide. The extent and duration of abciximab inhibition of ex vivo platelet aggregation, receptor blockade, and abciximab pharmacokinetics in monkeys during and after the abciximab infusion were not affected by prior infusion of the animals with tirofiban or eptifibatide. Conclusions: In vitro and in vivo studies revealed that the molecular interaction of abciximab with the platelet GPIIb/IIIa receptor is not altered by immediate prior exposure of platelets to small molecule GPIIb/IIIa antagonists. These preclinical studies suggest that the efficacy of abciximab should not be impaired if it is initiated following termination of therapy with small molecule GPIIb/IIIa antagonists.     

Single high-dose bolus tirofiban with high-loading-dose clopidogrel in primary coronary angioplasty

Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor therapy during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) decreases the incidence of major adverse cardiac events. These effects directly result from the level of platelet inhibition. It was shown that standard dosing of tirofiban is insufficient for optimal platelet inhibition. We sought to determine the efficacy and safety of single high-dose bolus (HDB) tirofiban with high-dose clopidogrel loading in primary PCI in acute ST elevation myocardial infarction. A total of 100 patients (mean age 55.2 ± 9.9 years, male/female = 86/14) undergoing primary PCI, pretreated with clopidogrel (450 mg) and aspirin (325 mg), were consecutively randomized into two groups. Group I (n = 50) received a standard dose bolus of tirofiban (10 μg/kg/3 min) with 24-h infusion at a rate of 0.15 μg/kg/min. Group II received single HDB tirofiban (25 μg/kg/3 min). The assessed angiographic, clinical, and echocardiographic endpoints were: initial and final Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) grade flow (TGF), corrected TIMI frame count (CTFC), ST-segment resolution (STR) at 90 min, in-hospital bleeding complications, echocardiographic left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), death, reinfarction, and repeat target vessel revascularization at 1 month. Platelet function inhibition was measured using PFA-100 (Behring-Dade, Liederbach, Germany) with a test cartridge unit containing a membrane coated with 2 μg of equine Type I collagen and 50 μg adenosine diphosphate before, and 10 min, 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 h after the bolus of the tirofiban in the first 10 cases of each group. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between groups. Initial TGF III was more frequent (24% vs 8%, P = 0.029) and the value of CTFC was lower (75 ± 34 vs 89 ± 25, P = 0.03) in group II. Postprocedural TGF, CTFC, STR, bleeding complications, and LVEF at 1 month were not different between the two groups. There was a higher rate of reinfarction in group II (8%) compared with group I (2%), but this difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). The results of platelet function analyses showed that group II patients had significantly prolonged platelet function assay closure times (299 ± 6 s) compared with group patients (236 ± 97 s) at 10 min after the bolus dose (P = 0.04). However, after the first dose between 2 and 24 h, PFA closure times were significantly prolonged in patients with tirofiban infusion. High-dose bolus of tirofiban seems to be safe and more effective than conventional dose at the periprocedural time, whereas continuous infusion of tirofiban may be necessary in the first 24 h before stable and safe antiplatelet status is reached with clopidogrel. However, safety and efficacy of HDB tirofiban and high-loading-dose clopidogrel together with tirofiban infusion requires further studies with a larger population.     

Long‐term mortality after bolus‐only administration of abciximab,eptifibatide, or tirofiban during percutaneous coronary intervention

Objective:

To evaluate the long‐term mortality after bolus‐only administration of abciximab, eptifibatide, and tirofiban during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Background:

Studies on platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors (GPI) administered as bolus‐only during PCI suggest that this strategy may be similar in efficacy, safer, and more cost‐effective compared to a bolus plus infusion of GPI.

Methods:

We evaluated 864 patients (abciximab = 274, eptifibatide = 361, and tirofiban = 229) who underwent PCI with a bolus‐only regimen during January 2003 to August 2005.

Results:

After a median follow up of four (interquartile range, 3–4.5) years, there were a total of 95 (11%) deaths. The survival rate was 83% in the abciximab group, 91% in the eptifibatide group, and 93% in the tirofiban group (P = 0.003 by log‐rank test). After adjustment for baseline clinical and procedural characteristics using a Cox proportional hazards model, the abciximab group had a significantly higher mortality compared to the eptifibatide group (P = 0.003; Hazard ratio (HR) for eptifibatide compared to abciximab was 0.49 (95% confidence intervals [CI]: 0.30–0.78). The long‐term mortality was not significantly different in the tirofiban group compared to the abciximab group (P = 0.33) or the eptifibatide group (P = 0.20), perhaps because of shorter follow‐up period and fewer patients in the tirofiban group.

Conclusion:

When given as bolus‐only during PCI, eptifibatide may improve long‐term survival compared to abciximab. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

The Use of the Point of Care Helena ICHOR/Plateletworks® and the Accumetrics Ultegra® RPFA for Assessment of Platelet Function with GPIIb-IIIa Antagonists

Objective: To evaluate a newly modified rapid platelet function analysis system (ICHOR/ Plateletworks®) and to compare the results obtained with those of traditional light transmission aggregometry (LTA), and the Ultegra/RPFA® system. Background: Anti-platelet therapy is standard of care for patients as an adjunct to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or for medical management of non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE ACS). Recent clinical trial results suggest that the three currently approved platelet GPIIb-IIIa receptor antagonists, eptifibatide, tirofiban and abciximab, may vary in extent of inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA) at the approved doses. Thus, pharmacodynamic evaluations of these agents to determine the extent of platelet function inhibition, especially during the periprocedural time of a cardiac intervention, are necessary. A rapid measurement method as a surrogate for LTA, the current gold standard, would be ideal in order to have the option for dose monitoring or adjustment prior to or during an intervention. The Helena ICHOR/ Plateletworks® may be useful for point of care testing. Methods: Blood samples collected in D-Phe-Pro-Arg-chloromethyl ketone dihydrochloride (PPACK) anticoagulant were treated with increasing concentrations of eptifibatide, tirofiban or abciximab. LTA was carried out in conjunction with the ICHOR/Plateletworks®, using a modified method, and Accumetrics Ultegra® with RPFA cartridges. Results: This study demonstrated that platelet inhibition measured by the ICHOR/Plateletworks® mirrored the level of IPA obtained with LTA. In contrast, the Ultegra® system had less correlation when compared to LTA at inhibition levels < 90%. Conclusions: Based on these data, the ICHOR/ Plateletworks® utilized under modified guidelines may serve as a surrogate for LTA when rapid measurements are necessary.Abbreviated Abstract A rapid platelet function measurement method as a surrogate for light transmission aggregometry (LTA), the current gold standard, is ideal in order to have the option for GPIIb-IIIa antagonist dose monitoring or adjustment prior to or during a coronary intervention. A newly modified rapid platelet function analysis system (ICHOR/Plateletworks® was evaluated and compared to the results obtained with traditional light transmission aggregometry (LTA), and the Ultegra/RPFA® system. Blood samples collected in D-Phe-Pro-Arg-chloromethyl ketone dihydrochloride (PPACK) anticoagulant were treated with increasing concentrations of eptifibatide, tirofiban or abciximab. LTA was carried out in conjunction with the ICHOR/Plateletworks®, using a modified method, and Accumetrics Ultegra® with RPFA cartridges. Based on these data, the ICHOR/Plateletworks® utilized under modified guidelines may serve as a surrogate for LTA when rapid measurements are necessary.Supported in part by Helena Laboratories, Inc. and the University of Tennessee Health Science Center Vascular Biology Center of ExcellenceThis revised version was published online in May 2005 with a corrected cover date.     

Elevated plasma fibrinogen level predicts suboptimal response to therapy with both single- and double-bolus eptifibatide during percutaneous coronary intervention.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine the factors associated with suboptimal platelet inhibition (PI) with single- and double-bolus eptifibatide during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). BACKGROUND: Although PI > or = 95% measured 10 min after glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor therapy is associated with improved outcomes following PCI, this level of PI often is not achieved. METHODS: We prospectively studied 150 patients undergoing PCI with single-bolus eptifibatide (180 microg/kg) (n = 100) and double-bolus eptifibatide (180 microg/kg administered 10 min apart) (n = 50) followed by standard infusion (2 microg/kg/min). Measuring platelet aggregation at baseline and at 10 min and 30 to 45 min after eptifibatide bolus, patients were classified as optimal responders (OPT) (> or =95% PI) or suboptimal responders (sub-OPT) (<95% PI) based on 10-min PI after final bolus. RESULTS: Suboptimal PI was achieved in 61% of patients with single-bolus eptifibatide and in 36% with double-bolus eptifibatide. In the single-bolus group, sub-OPT had higher fibrinogen levels (324 +/- 85 mg/dl vs. 259 +/- 49 mg/dl, p = 0.0002), platelet counts (221 +/- 70 vs. 186 +/- 47, p = 0.008), and white blood cell counts (7.7 +/- 2.3 vs. 6.6 +/- 1.9, p = 0.02). In the double-bolus group, sub-OPT also had higher fibrinogen levels (324 +/- 68 mg/dl vs. 278 +/- 53 mg/dl, p = 0.01) and were more likely to be smokers (38.9% vs. 9.4%, p = 0.01). Multivariable analysis showed that fibrinogen level was the only independent predictor of suboptimal PI, with fibrinogen cutoffs at 375 and 325 mg/dl predicting suboptimal PI (single-bolus: 100% and 90.0%, respectively; double-bolus: 100% and 60%, respectively) with both doses. CONCLUSIONS: During PCI, both single- and double-bolus eptifibatide provide suboptimal PI in a substantial proportion of patients. A fibrinogen level >375 mg/dl is a strong predictor of suboptimal PI.     

Effects of Different Thrombolytic Treatment Regimen with Abciximab and Tirofiban on Platelet Aggregation and Platelet-Leukocyte Interactions: A Subgroup Analysis from the GUSTO V and FASTER Trials

Background: Due to considerably high rates of reocclusion under standard thrombolytic therapy GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors have been combined with thrombolytics to improve therapeutic outcomes. Potential reasons for arterial reocclusion may be increased platelet activation, interaction of platelets with other cell types such as leukocytes and inadequate drug dosing due to lack of ideal platelet monitoring. We compared combination therapy regimens consisting of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors and thrombolytics with respect to platelet inhibition and platelet-leukocyte interactions. Methods and results: From the GUSTO V trial (standard rPA vs. reduced dose rPA and abciximab) and the FASTER trial (standard TNK-tPA vs. reduced dose TNK-tPA and tirofiban) 15 patients were monitored by platelet aggregometry, rapid platelet function assay (RPFA) and flow cytometry (FC). rPA alone (n = 5) caused initial increases in platelet aggregation. However, platelet aggregation was significantly (p < 0.05) and sufficiently (>80%) inhibited by abciximab/rPA (n = 5) and tirofiban/TNK-tPA (n = 5). The platelet inhibitory effect of tirofiban/TNK-tPA was more pronounced compared to abciximab/rPA with a significant difference after 2 h (p < 0.05). Tirofiban/TNK-tPA and abciximab/rPA caused decreases in platelet-leukocyte aggregates as well as in binding of specific antibodies to the platelet vitronectin receptor and P-selectin (p < 0.05, respect.). No differences among the treatment groups were seen with respect to antibody binding to MAC-1 and CD154/CD40 ligand. Conclusions: Taken together, GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors overcome the platelet activating effect of thrombolytics resulting in sufficient platelet inhibition. RPFA is a suitable monitoring tool to accurately assess platelet inhibition. Within the given combination treatment regimen tirofiban appears to be more effective compared to abciximab and to exert effects beyond the inhibition of GP IIb/IIIa.     

Rapid assessment of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade with the platelet function analyzer (PFA-100) during percutaneous coronary intervention

BACKGROUND: The platelet function analyzer PFA-100 (Dade Behring, Miami, Fla) evaluates platelet function by determining the time to occlusion of an aperture in a membrane coated with collagen and adenosine diphosphate or epinephrine as whole blood flows under shear stress conditions. Platelet aggregation causes aperture occlusion, and results are reported as closure time (CT). Interindividual variability is observed in the level of platelet inhibition achieved with use of the current abciximab dosing regimen (0.25-mg/kg bolus + 10-microg/min infusion for 12 hours). The relationships between specific levels of platelet inhibition and clinical efficacy and safety have not been fully established. METHODS AND RESULTS: We prospectively studied platelet function in 27 patients receiving abciximab during percutaneous coronary intervention. This evaluation included determinations of platelet-rich plasma aggregometry, receptor occupancy studies (D3 assay), and CT measurements at baseline and 10 minutes, 4 hours, 12 hours, and 24 hours after the bolus. All patients received abciximab, aspirin, and heparin; patients undergoing coronary stent implantation received aspirin and ticlopidine after the procedure. CT results were reported within 10 minutes after initiation of testing. For 96% of patients, CT was 300 seconds (maximum CT) immediately after abciximab bolus and remained so throughout the infusion. At 24 hours we observed variable recovery from platelet inhibition and in 72% of patients CT returned to normal (< or =130 seconds). CONCLUSIONS: Findings with the PFA-100 were similar to results observed with platelet aggregometry and receptor occupancy measurements. Most patients treated with abciximab exhibit normalized platelet function at 24 hours despite moderate levels of receptor occupancy, suggesting dissociation between occupancy and function.     

Downstream administration of a high-dose tirofiban bolus in high-risk patients with unstable angina undergoing early percutaneous coronary intervention

BACKGROUND: The best treatment option for high-risk patients with unstable coronary syndrome is an early invasive strategy accompanied by intensive anti-platelet therapy. We tested the effect on clinical outcome of early coronary angioplasty using a high-dose bolus of tirofiban in patients with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome. METHODS: One hundred and forty consecutive patients with unstable coronary syndrome who underwent an immediate percutaneous coronary intervention with the administration of a high (25 microg/kg) dose bolus of tirofiban followed by an 18-h infusion of 0.15 microg kg(-1) min(-1) were compared with a matched control group of 162 patients treated with abciximab. The primary endpoint of the study was the 30-day incidence of major adverse cardiac events; the secondary endpoints were the incidence of major and minor bleeding. RESULTS: The time from admission to PCI was slightly shorter in the tirofiban group (3.9+/-4.8 vs. 4.5+/-4.4 h; P=0.26). The 30-day rate of major adverse cardiac events was similar in the two groups (6% with tirofiban and 8.6% with abciximab: OR=1.37, 95% CI=0.58-3.29, P=0.52). No major bleeding episodes were observed; the incidence of minor bleeding was 3.6% in the tirofiban group and 2.5% in the abciximab group (OR=0.68, 95% CI=0.18-2.59, P=0.74). CONCLUSIONS: In this preliminary study, the beneficial effect of the administration of a high-dose tirofiban bolus on 30-day clinical outcomes was similar to that of abciximab in high-risk patients with unstable angina undergoing immediate percutaneous coronary intervention. The results of this therapeutic strategy should be tested in a larger randomised study.     

Pharmacodynamic profile of short-term readministration of abciximab in healthy subjects

Objective The purpose of the study was to establish a rebolus regimen for abciximab that restores pharmacologic glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor blockade within a short time frame (up to 48 hours) after completion of an initial treatment. Methods and Results The study was a single-center, nonrandomized, open-label dose escalation trial in healthy volunteers (n = 30). Each subject received a 0.25 mg/kg bolus and a 0.125 μg/kg per minute infusion of abciximab, followed by incremental bolus doses of the agent at 15-minute intervals up to 48 hours (10 per group) after completion of the infusion, (maximal cumulative rebolus dose of 0.25 mg/kg). Pharmacodynamic measurements (GP IIb/IIIa receptor blockade, turbidimetric and whole blood platelet aggregation with use of a rapid platelet function assay [RPFA]) were obtained at periodic intervals during and after administration of the abciximab bolus and infusion. At the time of the first rebolus, pharmacodynamic measurements were attained immediately before administration of each rebolus and 15 minutes after the last rebolus dose. In subjects who received reboluses 12 hours after infusion, a cumulative dose of 0.05 mg/kg restored >80% blockade of GP IIb/IIIa receptors and >80% inhibition of turbidimetric (5 and 20 μmol/L adenosine diphosphate) and RPFA aggregation in 10 of 10 subjects. At 24 hours after treatment, a cumulative abciximab bolus dose of 0.1 mg/kg restored >80% blockade of all 4 pharmacodynamic measurements in 10 of 10 subjects. At 48 hours after treatment, a cumulative bolus dose of 0.15 mg/kg restored >80% blockade of all 4 pharmacodynamic measurements in 10 of 10 subjects. Conclusions A fraction of the bolus of abciximab restored pharmacologic (>80%) GP IIb/IIIa receptor blockade when readministered at various postinfusion time points. These observations suggest that in the setting where acute readministration of abciximab is required less than a full bolus dose of the agent is warranted. (Am Heart J 2002;143:87-94.)