Adverse effects of cell saver in patients undergoing ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

A retrospective analysis of 56 patients undergoing ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair was performed to find out if cell saver had any impact on postoperative morbidity and mortality. All patients but one were male. The mean age was 68 ± 8 years (35-85 years). Cell saver was used in 40 patients (CS group) and was not used in 16 patients (NCS group). We compared the incidences of respiratory, renal, and gastrointestinal complications; reoperation; transfusion requirement; length of hospital stay; and mortality between the groups. This study demonstrated that intraoperative cell saver usage significantly increased the incidence of respiratory complications and the need for blood and fresh frozen plasma transfusion, and prolonged the hospital stay in patients with ruptured AAA, but did not have any impact on mortality. Postoperative complications were more prominent in patients who received >3000 mL cell saver blood.     

Relative cost of autologous red cell salvage versus allogeneic red cell transfusion during abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

The costs of washed autologous red cell concentrate obtained by intraoperative red cell salvage were compared to the costs of allogeneic packed red cell transfusion during 110 consecutive abdominal aortic aneurysm repairs. The mean volume of scavenged blood during elective procedures was 1350 ml (range 350 to 6675 ml, n = 90) and emergency procedures 2750 ml (range 750 to 9400 ml, n = 20). The mean volume of processed (washed) blood returned during elective repairs was 759 ml (range 150 to 2900 ml, n = 51) and emergency repairs 1117 ml (range 0 to 4100 ml, n = 20). During elective repairs, the cost of routine autologous red cell salvage ($151 per 285 ml unit) was only slightly greater than the estimated cost of cross-matched, leucocyte-reduced, allogeneic blood ($143 per 285 ml unit). During emergency repairs, washed autologous red cells ($83 per 285 ml unit) were less expensive than allogeneic packed red cells. These findings indicate that, compared with the use of allogeneic packed red cells, red cell salvage during emergency abdominal aortic aneurysm repair can be justified on an economic basis alone, and that routine red cell salvage during elective repair can achieve the benefits of autologous blood at little extra cost to the community.     

Eliminating homologous blood transfusions during abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

In order to eliminate homologous blood transfusions during abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair, increased usage of autologous predonation and intraoperative salvage is required. To determine what quantity of predonated blood is necessary to completely avoid the use of homologous blood, we reviewed the transfusion histories of 100 consecutive patients undergoing elective AAA repairs. A total of 445 units of blood were transfused, and the number of units required was directly proportional to the size of the aneurysm. One hundred sixty-six units of blood (37%) were homologous, and 279 units (63%) were autologous. Of the autologous units, 255 (91%) were from intraoperative salvage and 24 (9%) were predonated. Stratification of transfusions by size revealed that for aneurysms less than or equal to 7 cm, 132 units of homologous and 21 units of predonated blood were transfused (1.55 units per patient and 0.25 units per patient, respectively). For aneurysms greater than 7 cm, 34 units of homologous and 3 units of predonated blood were used (2.3 units per patient and 0.2 units per patient, respectively). From these data, it is concluded that predonation before surgery of a minimum of 2 units for patients with smaller aneurysms and 3 units for patients with larger aneurysms, combined with intraoperative salvage, should eliminate the need for any homologous blood transfusions associated with elective AAA repair.     

A randomized trial of intraoperative autotransfusion during aortic surgery

Purpose: The net benefit of routine intraoperative autotransfusion (IAT) in patients undergoing elective infrarenal aortic surgery was studied. Methods: One hundred patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair (n = 50) or aortofemoral bypass (AFB) for occlusive disease (n = 50) were randomized to IAT and control groups. This experience accounted for 58% of patients undergoing aortic surgery during the 16-month study period. Results: IAT and control groups were balanced for preoperative demographics, disease (50:50 split of AFB:AAA in each group), and risk factors. There were no significant differences between patients randomized to IAT and control patients in estimated blood loss (EBL), allogeneic blood transfusion (units administered intraoperatively, postoperatively, and total), proportion of patients not receiving allogeneic blood (34% of patients randomized to IAT and 28% of control patients), postoperative hemoglobin/hematocrit levels, and complications. IAT did not reduce allogeneic blood transfusion among all patients undergoing aortic surgery nor in any subgroups that might be more likely to benefit, such as those undergoing AAA repair, those with 1000 mL or more EBL, and those receiving larger volumes of IAT-processed blood. Conclusion: We could find no net benefit of IAT in patients undergoing elective, infrarenal aortic surgery. (J Vasc Surg 1999;29:22-31.)     

Autologous Versus Allogeneic Transfusion in Aortic Surgery: A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of acute normovolemic hemodilution (ANH) and intraoperative cell salvage (ICS) in blood-conservation strategies for infrarenal aortic surgery. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Recent concerns over the risks of transfusion-related infection have resulted in sharp rises in the cost of blood preparations. Autologous transfusion may be a safe alternative to allogeneic transfusion, which has been associated with immune modulation and postoperative infection. METHODS: This multicenter prospective randomized trial compared standard transfusion practice with autologous transfusion combining ANH with ICS in 145 patients undergoing elective aortic surgery. The primary outcome measures were the proportion of patients requiring allogeneic blood and the volume of allogeneic transfusion. The secondary outcome measures were the frequency of complications, including postoperative infection, and postoperative hospital stay. RESULTS: The combination of ANH and ICS reduced the volume of allogeneic blood transfused from a median of two units to zero units. The proportion of patients transfused was 56% in allogeneic and 43% in autologous. There were no significant differences in complications or length of hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: Both ANH and ICS were safe and reduced the allogeneic blood requirement in patients undergoing elective infrarenal aortic surgery.     

Impact of Red Cell Salvage on Transfusion Requirements during Elective Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

Elective abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) surgery may result in substantial blood loss. Concerns regarding the safety, availability, and acceptability of homologous blood have led to initiatives toward reducing transfusion requirements at the time of aneurysm repair. This study was designed to determine if the routine use of intraoperative red cell salvage and autotransfusion resulted in a reduction in homologous transfusion at our institution. A retrospective review of elective AAA repairs in the years 1987, 1992, and 1997 was carried out. Demographic data, operative details, blood loss, hemoglobin levels, red cell salvage and return volumes, and transfusion requirements were recorded and compared across the study years. From this study we conclude that routine use of red cell salvage and autotransfusion is an effective means for reducing transfusion requirements in elective AAA repair.     

The effect of acute normovolaemic haemodilution on blood transfusion requirements in abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

OBJECTIVE: to evaluate the impact of acute normovolaemic haemodilution (ANH) on the blood transfusion requirements in elective abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair in a single vascular unit. METHODS: thirty-two patients underwent ANH during elective AAA repair between 1992 and 1997. The operation was performed by the same surgeon/anaesthetist team in 75% of cases. Their demographic details, type of aneurysm (infra-renal or supra-renal), preoperative blood cross match, use of intra-operative red cell salvage, blood loss, peri-operative bank blood requirements, pre-op and on-discharge haemoglobin levels and post-operative outcome were recorded. The results were compared to a group of 40 randomly selected patients (to represent the unit average) who underwent elective AAA repair by variable surgeon/anaesthetist teams without ANH in the same time period. RESULTS: there were more supra-renal AAA repairs in the ANH group (8/32) than in the non-ANH group (0/40, p<0.01). ANH patients required significantly less blood transfusion peri-operatively (median 2 units) than the non-ANH patients (median 3 units, p=0.02). There were no other significant differences between the variables measured. CONCLUSION: these results suggest that a dedicated team can achieve significant reductions in the use of heterologous blood transfusion compared to the vascular unit average experience by the effective use of ANH.     

Hormonal stress response and hemodynamic stability in patients undergoing endovascular vs. conventional abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: To investigate the effect of two different surgical techniques with different anesthetic modes on intraoperative and postoperative hormonal stress response, hemodynamic stability, fluid loading and renal function in patients scheduled for elective infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty consecutive patients scheduled for elective infrarenal AAA repair were allocated without randomizing into two groups: an endovascular (EVAR, n = 20) and a conventional (CAR, n = 20) aneurysm repair group according to aneurysm morphology as determined by preoperative computed tomography and angiography. The EVAR group were operated under spinal anesthesia and the CAR group using general anesthesia with epidural blockade. RESULTS: Patients undergoing CAR showed lower intraoperative mean arterial pressure and significantly higher plasma norepinephrine before aortic cross-clamping and significantly higher lactate after aortic declamping and postoperatively than patients in the EVAR group. Postoperatively, vasopressin and serum cortisol were also significantly higher in the CAR group. Fluid loading and estimated blood loss were more excessive in the CAR group. CONCLUSIONS: Stress response was lower and hemodynamic stability and lower body perfusion superior and renal function also better maintained in patients undergoing EVAR under spinal anesthesia as compared to those undergoing CAR using general anesthesia with epidural blockade.     

Blood loss and transfusion in elective abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative blood loss and transfusion are known determinants of mortality and morbidity of elective abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. The present study analysed the pattern of blood loss and transfusion and evaluated the risk factors of blood loss during open repair of infrarenal AAA. METHODS: Blood loss, transfusion and fluid replacement during elective open repair operation for patients with infrarenal AAA were correlated to demographic data, operative findings and procedural information. RESULTS: A total of 129 patients with a mean age of 71 years was analysed. The mean blood loss was 1000 +/- 887 mL (200-6000 mL). Blood transfusion, with a mean transfusion volume of 400 +/- 591 mL (0-3000 mL), was required in 46% of patients. Univariate analysis showed that bodyweight, renal impairment, low haemoglobin and platelet counts, iliac artery involvement, large aneurysm, bifurcated graft, large graft diameter, prolonged aortic clamp time and long operation time were associated with a higher blood loss. A haemoglobin level of <10.5 g/dL (relative risk (RR): 4.6), platelet count <130 x 10(9)/L (RR: 3.9), aortic clamp time >50 min (RR: 15), total operation time >200 min (RR: 11) and type of graft (RR: 3.5) were identified as independent determinants of blood loss on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative blood loss in elective infrarenal aneurysm surgery is influenced by patients' haematological parameters, distal involvement of aneurysm and degree of difficulty of operation.     

Epidemiological study of the relationship between volume and outcome after abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery in the UK from 2000 to 2005

BACKGROUND: The aim was to assess the relationship between hospital volume and outcome after abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) surgery in the UK. METHODS: Hospital Episode Statistics (2000-2005) were classified as elective, urgent or ruptured AAA repair. Analysis was by modelling of mortality rate, complication rate and length of hospital stay with regard to the annual operative volume, after risk adjustment. RESULTS: There were 112,545 diagnoses, or repairs, of AAAs, of which 26,822 were infrarenal aneurysms. The mean mortality rate was 7.4, 23.6 and 41.8 per cent for elective, urgent and ruptured AAA repair respectively. Elective AAA repair undertaken at high-volume hospitals showed volume-related improvements in mortality (P < 0.001). Patients were discharged from hospital earlier (P < 0.001). The critical volume threshold was 32 elective AAA repairs per year. For urgent repair, patients at high-volume hospitals had a reduced mortality rate (P = 0.017) with an increased length of stay (P = 0.041). There was no relationship between volume and outcome for ruptured AAA repairs. CONCLUSION: Increased annual volumes were associated with significant reductions in mortality for elective and urgent AAA repair, but not for repair of ruptured AAAs.     

Endovascular versus "fast-track'' abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

Recent studies have shown that endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) has decreased costs, as well as decreased intensive care unit and total hospital length of stays when compared to abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair using a retroperitoneal exposure. The authors hypothesized that the fast-track AAA repair, which combines a retroperitoneal exposure with a patient care pathway that includes a gastric promotility agent and patient-controlled analgesia, would have no differences when compared to EVAR. Records of 58 patients who underwent AAA repair between April 14, 2000, and July 12, 2002, were reviewed retrospectively. Demographic information, length of stay, intraoperative and postoperative complications, mortality, and costs were evaluated. Fifty-eight AAA repairs were performed with the EVAR (n=28) and fast-track (n=30) techniques. The EVAR group was slightly older (72 vs 68 years, p=0.04), had slightly smaller average aneurysm size (5.5 +/-0.13 vs 6.1 +/-0.17 cm, p=0.008), and had more patients designated American Society of Anesthesia class 4 (p<0.0001). Both groups were predominantly male. Otherwise there were no statistically significant differences in risk factors. Patients who underwent fast-track repair tended to have a longer operation (216 +/-7.4 vs 158 +/-6.8 minutes, p<0.0001), with a greater volume of blood (1.8 +/-0.29 vs 0.32 +/-0.24 units, p=0.0005), colloid (565 +/-89 vs 32 +/-22 cc, p<0.0001), and crystalloid transfusions (4,625 +/-252 vs 2,627 +/-170 cc, p<0.0001). There were no statistically significant differences in the number of intraoperative or postoperative complications between the 2 groups. EVAR patients resumed a regular diet earlier (0.21 +/-0.08 vs 1.8 +/-0.11 days, p<0.0001). Intensive care unit stay was shorter for EVAR (0.50 +/-0.10 vs 0.87 +/-0.10 days, p=0.01), but floor (2.1 +/-0.23 vs 2.6 +/-0.21 days, p=0.17), and total hospital lengths of stay (2.8 +/-0.32 vs 3.4 +/-0.18 days, p=0.07) were similar between the 2 groups. Total hospital cost was lower in the fast-track (10,205 dollars +/-736 dollars vs 20,640 dollars +/- 1,206 dollars, p<0.0001) leading to greater overall hospital earnings (6,141 dollars +/- 1,280 dollars vs 107 dollars +/- 1,940 dollars, p=0.01). Fast-track AAA repair is a viable alternative for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Compared to endovascular repair, the fast-track method had increased transfusions of blood and intravenous fluids and increased operating room times, but equivalent lengths of floor and total hospital stay and increased total hospital earnings.     

Minimizing blood transfusions during abdominal aortic surgery: recent advances in rapid autotransfusion

The purpose of this study was to determine what percentage of patients could avoid the transfusion of any homologous bank blood products during elective abdominal aortic surgery with a recently developed semicontinuous, rapid autotransfusion device. Fifty patients (26 with abdominal aortic aneurysms and 24 with aortic occlusive disease) prospectively received intraoperative autologous transfusion (group 1) and were matched for comparison with 50 patients receiving homologous blood without use of any autotransfusion equipment (group 2). For the entire perioperative period, 34 group 1 patients (68%) received only their own autotransfused blood and no other homologous blood components compared with group 2 in which 48 patients (96%) required some bank blood (p less than 0.0001). Rapid autotransfusion reduced usage of homologous red cell transfusion by 75%. The mean postoperative hemoglobin was similar in both groups (group 1, 11.91 gm/dl vs. group 2, 11.90 gm/dl, p = 0.73). Rapid autotransfusion was not associated with significant hemolysis, air embolism, or coagulopathy and did not increase morbidity or death. By eliminating the need for any bank blood components in most patients, rapid autotransfusion minimizes the risk of blood-borne diseases and transfusion reactions. New rapid autotransfusion devices offer a distinct advantage over past equipment and allow significant changes in current transfusion practices during elective abdominal aortic reconstructions.     

Minimizing the use of homologous blood products during repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms

The recent threat of post-transfusion AIDS and increased awareness of blood-related hepatitis have compelled surgeons to minimize the use of homologous blood products during aortic aneurysm repair. Reducing or eliminating homologous blood transfusion can be achieved by aggressive attention to three aspects of patient care: (1) routine use of autologous transfusion; (2) careful surgical technique, emphasizing the minimum dissection needed to expose the aneurysm adequately; and (3) a higher threshold for use of any blood products. In a prospective study of 100 consecutive aortic reconstructions, 80 per cent of patients undergoing aneurysm repair received only their own blood during hospitalization. Routine intraoperative autologous red-cell salvage has also conserved the bank blood supply by reducing usage of homologous blood by 75 per cent. The key to minimizing homologous blood requirements for aneurysm repair has been the development of rapid cell-washing autotransfusion devices.     

Blood substitution in aorto-iliac surgery]

To determine the amount of blood substitution required we evaluated in a retrospective analysis 68 consecutive patients that were operated on the infrarenal abdominal aorta 1990, 60 men with a mean age of 66 years (40-87) and 8 women, aged 73 years (62-85). Indications for treatment were: aneurysm (55) and occlusive disease (13). 21 aneurysms (45%) were ruptured and had to be operated as an emergency. Early lethality (less than 30 days) in this group was 19% (n = 4). In the other 47 patients there was no early mortality. Mean blood products transfusion requirements in patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm was: 18 (9-34) units of concentrated red cells, 16 (3-43) units of fresh frozen plasma (FFP) and 5 (0-19) units of concentrated red cells, 2 (0-7) units of FFP in the elective group. Main determinants of blood loss in the elective group were: the number of anastomoses and the preoperative status of the coagulant system. We conclude that in elective surgery of the infrarenal aorta homologous transfusion can be virtually eliminated if an entire autologous transfusion concepts is applied (predonation, intraoperative salvage, hemodilution and plasmapheresis).     

Intraoperative autologous transfusion during elective infrarenal aortic reconstruction: A decision analysis model

Purpose: The use of intraoperative autologous transfusion devices expanded during the last decade as a result of the increased awareness of transfusion-associated complications. This study was designed to determine whether routine use of an intraoperative autologous transfusion device (Haemonetics Cell Saver [CS]) during elective infrarenal aortic reconstructions is cost-effective ($50,000/QALYs threshold).Methods: A decision analysis tree was constructed to model all of the complications that are associated with red blood cell replacement during aortic reconstructions for both abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) and aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD). It was assumed that a unit of CS return (CSR; 250 ml/unit) equaled a unit of packed red blood cells (PRBCs) and that all CS transfusions were necessary. Transfusion requirements (AAA: PRBC = 2.8 ± 3.2 units, CSR = 3.7 ± 3.2 units; AIOD: PRBC = 3.1 ± 3.0 units, CSR = 2.1 ± 1.7 units) were determined from retrospective review of all elective aortic reconstructions (AAA, N = 63; AIOD, N=75) from Jan. 1991 to June 1995 in which the CS was used (82.1% of all reconstructions). Risk of allogenic transfusion-related complications (transfusion reaction, hepatitis B, hepatitis C, human immunodeficiency virus, human T-cell lymphotropic virus types I and II) and their associated treatment costs (expressed in dollars and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were obtained from the medical literature, institutional audit, and a consensus of physicians.Results: Routine use of the CS during elective infrarenal aortic reconstructions was not cost-effective in our practice. Use during reconstructions for AAA repairs cost $263.75 but added only 0.00218 QALYs, for a rate of $120,794/QALY. Use during reconstructions for AIOD was even more costly at $356.68 and provided even less benefit at 0.00062 QALYs, for a rate of $578,275/QALY. The sensitivity analyses determined that the routine use of the CS would be cost-effective in our practice only for AAA repairs if the incidence of hepatitis C were tenfold greater than the baseline assumption. The model determined that CS was cost-effective if the CSR exceed 5 units during reconstructions for AAA and 6 units during reconstructions for AIOD.Conclusions: The routine use of the CS during elective infrarenal aortic reconstructions is not cost-effective. The use of the device should be reserved for a select group of aortic reconstructions, including those in which cost-effective salvage volumes are anticipated. Alternatively, the CS should be used as a reservoir and activated as a salvage device if significant bleeding is encountered. (J Vasc Surg 1997;25:984-94.)     

Symptomatic,nonruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: Are emergent operations necessary?

To evaluate current morbidity and mortality and to define the best strategy of management, we retrospectively reviewed the clinical histories of 36 patients (24 males and 12 females) who underwent repair of symptomatic, nonruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) between April 1, 1987, and April 30, 1992, at the Mayo Clinic (3.2% of 1111 patients with AAA repair). Ages ranged from 54 to 94 years (mean 75 years). All patients were hemodynamically stable and presented with abdominal and/or back pain of 1 to 60 days' duration (mean 11.6 days). The diagnosis of AAA was confirmed by CT scan in 26 patients, ultrasonogram in seven, and plain abdominal films in three. Fourteen patients (38.9%) were operated on emergently within 4 hours of admission, 11 (30.5%) between 4 and 24 hours, and 11 between 24 hours and 7 days following presentation (mean 28.9 hours). Eight (22.2%) had inflammatory aneurysm. AAAs were repaired with a straight graft in 17 patients and a bifurcated graft in 19. Complications occurred in 24 patients (66.7%). Mortality was 11.1% (4/36). The association between emergency repair (<4 hours) and 60-day mortality was significant (p<0.05).There were no deaths among those patients whose operation was delayed. Comparison to a matched control group of 72 patients who underwent elective AAA repair revealed an increased incidence of inflammatory aneurysm and female gender among our study group. The symptomatic patients had larger aneurysms (6.5 vs. 5.6 cm,p<0.05)and required more intraoperative transfusions. Intensive care unit and hospital stay was longer in the symptomatic patients (p<0.001);morbidity was markedly increased (p<0.001).We conclude that repair of symptomatic, nonruptured AAA continues to be associated with increased mortality and high morbidity in comparison to elective aneurysm repair. Emergency repair of symptomatic, nonruptured aneurysm may contribute to the higher morbidity rate.Presented at the Third Annual Winter Meeting of the Peripheral Vascular Surgery Society, Breckenridge, Colo., January 22–25, 1993.     

Analysis of medical risk factors and outcomes in patients undergoing open versus endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

OBJECTIVE: The emergence of endovascular repair (ER) for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) has provided surgeons with a new technique that should ideally improve patient outcomes. To more accurately characterize the advantages of ER versus traditional/open AAA repair (TOR), we compared the preoperative medical risk factors (PMRFs) and perioperative outcomes (PO) of those patients undergoing elective treatment of infrarenal AAA with ER and TOR over a recent 18-month period at our center. METHODS: Through our institutional vascular surgery patient registry, all patients undergoing aortic aneurysm repair of any type between December 1999 and June 2001 were identified. Only those patients undergoing elective infrarenal AAA repair were analyzed. Hospital records were examined for all patients, and PMRF and PO were assessed via Society for Vascular Surgery/International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery reporting guidelines. Student t, chi(2), Fisher exact, or Wilcoxon rank sum tests were applied where appropriate to determine differences among PMRF and PO according to method of aneurysm repair. RESULTS: During the 18-month study period, a total of 199 aortic aneurysms were repaired at our institution. Ninety-nine elective infrarenal AAA repairs made up the study cohort (ER, n = 33; TOR, n = 66). When examined by method of aneurysm repair, no differences existed in demographics or AAA size. Patients undergoing ER had a significantly greater degree of preoperative pulmonary comorbidity than patients undergoing TOR (P <.001). However, no differences existed in terms of American Society of Anesthesiologists classification or cardiac (P =.52), cerebrovascular (P =.44), diabetic (P =.51), hypertensive (P =.90), hyperlipidemia (P =.91) or renal (P =.23) comorbidities between the two groups. Perioperative morbidity and mortality rates were also not significantly different by method of repair. ER was associated with shorter operative time, intensive care unit stay, and overall hospital length of stay (P <.0001). However, subsequent operative procedures related to the AAA repair were performed more frequently after ER (TOR = 1.5% versus ER = 15.2%; P = 0.015). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that ER offers improvements in hospital convalescent and operating room times but no beneficial impact on overall morbidity and mortality rates when similar PMRFs exist, especially when used at medical centers where low morbidity and mortality rates are already established for TOR. Other centers performing ER should undertake such an analysis to assess its impact on their patients.     

An audit of emergency abdominal aortic aneurysm repair to establish the necessity for an emergency vascular surgical rota.

Mortality for emergency abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair remains high but results of specialist vascular surgeons are superior to those of general surgeons. A retrospective audit was performed on all patients undergoing emergency AAA repair over 53 months at one hospital to determine the necessity for a vascular specialist on-call rota. Patients were stratified into two groups, those treated by specialist vascular surgeons and those treated by general surgeons. There were 37 patients in the vascular surgeon group and 36 in the general surgeon group. There was no significant difference between the two groups when age, sex distribution, APACHE II score on admission, pre-operative delay and type of rupture were considered. The average operating time was 114.7 min in the vascular surgeon group and 111.9 min in the general surgeon group. Total blood transfusion requirements, and postoperative duration of ventilation, inotrope therapy and intensive treatment unit stay were similar in the two groups. Intra-operative, 30-day and cumulative hospital mortalities were 10.8% versus 8.3%, 32.4% versus 38.9% and 40.5% versus 38.9% in the vascular surgeon and general surgeon groups, respectively. The mortality figures compare favourably with other published series. As the results of the two groups were similar, there is currently no need for vascular surgeons to be routinely available for acute AAA surgery at our hospital.     

Abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in the over eighties

Between January 1980 and September 1988, 34 octogenarians underwent aortic aneurysm repair. There were 26 men and eight women with a median age of 83 years (range 80-88 years). Twenty underwent 'emergency' repair after presenting with pain and/or collapse: 11 with a retroperitoneal rupture, three with an intraperitoneal rupture and six with an expanding aneurysm. The mortality rate for this group was 35 per cent. During the same period 14 patients had an elective repair and there were no deaths within 30 days. The mean hospital stay for the elective group was 14.2 days compared with 17.0 days for survivors in the emergency group. There was no significant difference in terms of risk factors between those who developed postoperative complications and those who did not. These mortality rates compare favourably with our overall mortality results for elective (4.6 per cent) and emergency (31 per cent) surgery. Those patients over 80 years of age with infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms should not be refused surgery on the basis of age alone; each patient should be judged individually.     

To what extent has endovascular aneurysm repair influenced abdominal aortic aneurysm management in the state of Illinois?

PURPOSE: This study was performed using population-based data to determine the changing trends in the techniques for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair in the state of Illinois during the past 9 years and to examine the extent to which endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has influenced overall AAA management. METHODS: All records of patients who underwent AAA repair (1995 to 2003 inclusive) were retrieved from the Illinois Hospital Association COMPdata database. The outcome as determined by in-hospital mortality was analyzed according to intervention type (open vs EVAR) and indication (elective repair vs ruptured AAA). Data were stratified by age, gender, and hospital type (university vs community setting) and then analyzed using both univariate (chi 2 , t tests) and multivariate (stepwise logistic regression) techniques. RESULTS: Between 1995 and 2003, 14,517 patients underwent AAA repair (85% for elective and 15% for ruptured AAA). The average age was 71.4 +/- 7.9 years, and 76% were men. For elective cases, open repair was performed in 86% and EVAR in 14%; and for ruptured cases, open repair in 97% and EVAR in 3%. Elective EVAR was associated with lower in-hospital mortality compared with open repair regardless of age. No differences were observed with age after either type of repair for a ruptured aneurysm. Men had a lower in-hospital mortality compared with women for open repair of both elective and ruptured aneurysms. For EVAR, the mortality of an elective repair was lower in men, but there was no difference after a ruptured AAA. In men, the difference in mortality between elective open repair and EVAR was significant; the type of institution did not influence outcome. Patients >80 years of age had a higher mortality after open repair for both elective and ruptured AAA and after EVAR of a ruptured AAA. The average length of stay was 9.9 days for open elective repair, 13.1 days after open repair of a ruptured AAA, and 3.6 days for EVAR. The independent predictors of higher in-hospital mortality were female gender, age >80 years, diagnosis (ruptured vs open), and procedure (open vs EVAR). The year of the procedure and type of hospital (university vs community) were not predictive of outcome. CONCLUSIONS: EVAR has had a significant impact on AAA management in Illinois over a relatively short time period. In this population-based review, EVAR was associated with a significantly decreased in-hospital mortality and length of stay. Octogenarians had higher mortality after both types of repair, with the exception of elective EVAR.