Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: Clinical and Electrophysiological Features and Predictors of Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence Following Elimination of Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia

Introduction: Clinical and electrophysiological characteristics of patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) have not been studied in a large patient cohort. We aimed to define the clinical features and cardiac electrophysiological characteristics of these patients, and to examine the incidence and identify predictors of AF recurrences after elimination of AVNRT. Methods and Results: Thirty-six patients with AVNRT and documented paroxysmal AF (Group 1) and 497 patients with AVNRT alone undergoing ablation in the same period (Group 2) were studied. There were no significant differences between groups regarding clinical features, except age, which was higher in Group 1 (p < 0.001). Presence of atrial vulnerability (induction of AF lasting > 30 seconds) and multiple AH jumps (≥50 ms) before ablation were significantly more prevalent in Group 1 (p < 0.001, p = 0.010 respectively). During follow-up of 34 ± 11 months, AF recurred in 10 patients (28%) in Group 1, while 2 patients in Group 2 (0.4%) developed paroxysmal AF (p < 0.001). Univariate predictors of AF were: left atrial diameter > 40 mm (p = 0.001), presence of mitral or aortic calcification (p = 0.003), atrial vulnerability after ablation (p = 0.015) and valvular disease (p = 0.042). However, independent predictors of AF recurrences were left atrial diameter > 40 mm (p = 0.002) and the presence of atrial vulnerability after ablation (p = 0.034). Conclusion: In patients with both AVNRT and paroxysmal AF, the recurrence rate of AF after elimination of AVNRT is 28%. Left atrial diameter greater than 40 mm and atrial vulnerability after elimination of AVNRT are independent predictors of AF recurrences in the long term.     

P波离散度对房颤消融术后预后的影响

目的探讨P波离散度(Pd)对阵发房颤环肺静脉消融(CPVA)术远期预后的预测价值。方法顺序入选116例阵发性房颤患者行CPVA术至肺静脉电隔离。测量和计算算末次消融术前和术后P波最大值(Pmax),P波最小值(Pmin),P波离散度(Pd)。结果随访45.7±19.2个月,112例患者完成了研究,成功率达78.6%。根据随访结果,分为成功组和复发组。两组消融术前Pmax、Pmin和Pmax相似。成功组术后Pmax和Pd显著降低[Pmax(101.2±10.9)vs(.117.3±13.8)ms,p<0.01;Pd(34.8±6.7)vs.(49.3±10.3)ms,p<0.01],而复发组术后P波各参数均无明显变化。两组相比,成功组术后Pd和Pmax较复发组显著降低[Pmax(116.4±9.9)ms,Pd(49.2±8.8)ms]。COX回归分析显示两组左房内径和LVEF均无明显差异;术后Pd和Pmax是阵发房颤CPVA术后远期复发的独立预测因子。结论 Pmax和Pd反映了心房非均质性活动,术后Pmax和Pd可作为阵发房颤CPVA术后远期复发的预测因素。     

P Wave Dispersion: A Valuable Electrocardiographic Marker for the Prediction of Paroxysmal Lone Atrial Fibrillation

Background: The prolongation of atrial conduction time and the inhomogeneous propagation of sinus impulses are well known electrophysiological characteristics in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Methods: The aim of this study was to test the ability of a new ECG marker to discriminate between patients with a prior history of paroxysmal lone atrial fibrillation and healthy controls. Maximum P wave duration (Pmax) and the difference between the maximum and the minimum P wave duration, which was defined as P-wave dispersion (Pdisp) were calculated from the 12-lead surface ECGs of 75 patients with a history of paroxysmal lone atrial fibrillation and 50 age-matched healthy controls. Results: Pmax was in patients 122 ± 17 ms and in controls 101 ± 10 ms (t = 7.935, P > 0.001). Pdisp was in patients 48 ± 16 ms and in controls 29 ± 8 ms (t = 7.616, P > 0.001). A Pmax value of 110 ms separated patients from controls with a sensitivity 85%, a specificity 72%, and a positive predictive accuracy of 82%. A Pdisp value of 40 ms separated patients from controls with a sensitivity of 81%, a specificity of 80%, and a positive predictive accuracy of 85%. Conclusions: (1) Pmax and Pdisp values were found to be significantly higher in patients with a prior history of paroxysmal lone atrial fibrillation than in age-matched healthy controls, and (2) Pdisp is a new simple ECG marker that could be possibly used for the identification of patients with a previous history of paroxysmal lone atrial fibrillation. A.N.E. 1999;4(1):39–45     

射频消融术中房室结快慢径前传不应期变化及其意义

探讨 2 7例房室结折返性心动过速 (AVNRT)病人射频消融术 (RFCA)中房室结前传有效不应期 (ERP)变化的意义 ,应用心房程序刺激法测定放电前后房室结快慢径前传ERP并据此指导治疗。结果 :2 7例AVNRT病人房室结ERP对射频电流呈 4种反应 :①快径前传ERP缩短 10例。其中 6例表现为引起跳跃的S2 间期缩短 ,无心房回波 ,异丙肾上腺素可诱发AVNRT ,继续寻找并消融慢径 ,跳跃现象消失。 4例前传ERP由 36 0± 15ms缩至 170± 8ms,跳跃消失 ,异丙肾上腺素不能诱发AVNRT ,不再消融。②快径前传ERP延长 6例 ,由 36 0± 10ms增至 430± 12ms。延长S2 与S1耦联间期行心房程序刺激 ,跳跃再现 ,继续寻找并消融慢径至跳跃消失。③慢径前传ERP缩短 5例。术中AVNRT频率由 170± 14次 /分增至 2 30± 11次 /分。继续消融慢径 ,跳跃消失。④慢径前传ERP延长 6例 ,表现为AVNRT的频率减慢 ,继续消融慢径获成功。上述病人经 3.3± 0 .8( 2 .0～ 4.5 )年的随访 ,未见房室阻滞 (AVB)发生 ,亦无AVNRT复发。结论 :对于少数AVNRT病人 ,借助术中房室结前传ERP的变化指导消融 ,可望提高治疗效率、减少复发机率、避免AVB的发生。     

快速心房起搏时SV间期与SS间期的比值在房室结折返性心动过速慢径消融中的应用

评价快速心房起搏时最快 1∶1房室传导的SV间期 (SV间期 )与 1∶1房室传导的最短S1S1间期 (SS间期 )的比值 (SV/SS)在房室结折返性心动过速 (AVNRT)慢径消融中的应用 ,将AVNRT分为房室结功能曲线连续组 (Ⅰ组 ,10例 )及房室结功能曲线不连续组 (Ⅱ组 ,17例 )测量心房分级递增刺激时的SS间期与SV间期及SV/SS ,并进行消融前、后和组间比较。结果显示 ,两组消融后SV间期较消融前明显缩短 (Ⅰ组 :2 2 1.0± 2 2 .3vs 35 7.0± 43.7ms;Ⅱ组 :2 0 2 .1± 30 .6vs 379.4± 44 .2ms,P均 <0 .0 5 ) ;消融前后SS间期无明显变化 (Ⅰ组 :310 .0± 40 .6vs 30 8.0± 36 .8ms;Ⅱ组 :332 .9± 48.1vs 336 .5± 6 2 .3ms) ;两组中所有患者消融前SV/SS比值均 >1,而消融后SV/SS比值均 <1。结论 :SV/SS可作为慢径消融成功终点的辅助观察指标之一 ,尤其对于房室结传导曲线呈连续性者 ,使用此方法可简便地观察消融终点 ,增加消融的目的性。     

Prediction of the Recurrence of Atrial Fibrillation After Successful Cardioversion with P Wave Signal‐Averaged ECG

Background: The recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) was often observed after cardioversion. Methods: In our study, a P wave triggered P wave signal‐averaged ECG (P‐SAECG) was performed on 118 consecutive patients 1 day after successful electrical cardioversion in order to evaluate the utility of this method to predict AF after cardioversion. We measured the filtered P wave duration (FPD) and the root mean square voltage of the last 20 ms of the P wave (RMS 20). Results: During a 1‐year follow‐up, a recurrence was observed in 57 patients (48%). Patients with recurrence of AF had a larger left atrial size (41.9 ± 4.0 vs 39.3 ± 3.1 mm, P < 0.0003), a longer FPD (139.6 ± 16.0 vs 118.2 ± 14.1 ms, P < 0.0001), and a lower RMS 20 (2.57 ± 0.77 vs 3.90 ± 0.99 μV, P < 0.0001). A cutoff point (COP) of FPD ≥126 ms and RMS 20 ≤3.1 μV could predict AF with a specificity of 77%, a sensitivity of 72%, a positive value of 75%, a negative predictive value of 75%, and an accuracy of 75%. A stepwise logistic regression analysis of variables identified COP (odds ratio 9.97; 95% CI, 4.10–24.24, P < 0.0001) as an independent predictor for recurrence. Conclusions: We conclude that the probability of recurrence of AF after cardioversion could be predicted by P‐SAECG. This method seems to be appropriate to demonstrate a delayed atrial conduction that might be a possible risk factor of reinitiation of AF.     

房室结折返性心动过速患者房室结功能曲线连续性的电生理分析

分析房室结折返性心动过速 (AVNRT)中房室结功能曲线呈连续性者的电生理特点。将AVNRT分为房室结功能曲线连续组 (Ⅰ组 )及房室结功能曲线不连续组 (Ⅱ组 ) ,行慢径消融 ,进行消融前后和组间的电生理比较 ,分析房室结功能曲线呈连续性者的特点。结果 :I组心房程序刺激对AVNRT的诱发率仅 42 % (5 / 12 ) ,低于Ⅱ组的 6 6 %(2 3/ 35 )。Ⅰ组房室结前传有效不应期 (ERP AVN)消融前后无显著变化 (2 18.2± 2 9.3msvs 2 5 3.3± 80 .3ms,P >0 .0 5 ) ;心房程序刺激最长A2 H2 间期 (AHmax)消融前后无显著变化 (2 2 5 .8± 71.8msvs 175 .4± 41.9ms,P >0 .0 5 )。Ⅱ组ERP AVN消融后显著延长 (2 78.9± 5 8.9msvs 2 35 .8± 39.6ms,P <0 .0 5 ) ;AHmax消融后显著缩短 (172 .0± 6 7.1msvs 331.6± 86 .6ms ,P <0 .0 5 ) ;消融后房室结快径前传有效不应期 (ERP FP)显著缩短 (2 78.9± 5 8.9msvs 330 .0±5 5 .3ms,P <0 .0 5 )。消融前Ⅰ组AHmax短于Ⅱ组 (P <0 .0 5 ) ,Ⅰ组心动过速时A2 H2 间期 (AHSVT)与消融前AHmax比较差异无显著性 (P >0 .0 5 ) ;Ⅱ组AHSVT短于消融前AHmax(P <0 .0 5 )。结论 :房室结功能曲线连续性者较难经常规心房程序刺激诱发心动过速 ;慢径消融后曲线“尾巴”消失可作为消融终点的一项指     

Inducible supraventricular tachycardias in patients referred for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation.

AIMS: To investigate the prevalence of underlying, inducible supraventricular arrhythmias in patients referred for ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS AND RESULTS: Electrophysiology study reports of 409 consecutive patients (18% female), aged 55 +/- 9 years, who were referred for catheter ablation of AF, were studied. At electrophysiology study, arrhythmias other than AF were induced in 31 patients (7.6%). Cavotricuspid-dependent atrial flutter was induced in 15 patients (3.7%), slow-fast atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT) in seven patients (1.7%), atrioventricular re-entrant tachycardia (AVRT) due to an accessory pathway in five patients (1.2%), and atrial tachycardia (AT) in four patients (0.98%). Specific ablation aimed at elimination of the underlying arrhythmia only was performed in 13 patients, isolation of the pulmonary veins without additional ablation in three patients, and a combined procedure was performed in the remaining 15 patients. No significant association was observed between type of induced arrhythmia and type of ablation performed (P = 0.338). Slow pathway ablation without pulmonary vein isolation was more common among patients with AVNRT (five patients, 71%). AF recurrence was higher among patients in whom atrial flutter was induced at electrophysiology study (eight patients, 53%) compared to those with AVRT (no patient), AT (no patient), or AVNRT (one patient) (P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Patients referred for ablation of paroxysmal AF should be investigated for evidence of underlying supraventricular arrhytmias. In patients with AVNRT, slow pathway ablation may be the only procedure that is necessary for cure of AF. Inducibility of atrial flutter appears to carry an increased risk of AF recurrence regardless of whether the cavotricuspid isthmus is also ablated.     

异丙肾上腺素对射频消融房室结折返性心动过速疗效评价的意义

对消融房室结慢径的７２例房室结折返性心动过速（ＡＶＮＲＴ）病人进行观察分析，以了解异丙肾上腺素在ＡＶＮＲＴ射频消融中的临床价值。消融前电生理检查时有２７．８％（２０／７２）的病人未能诱发ＡＶＮＲＴ，静脉滴注异丙肾上腺素后，８５．０％（１７／２０）则能诱发；消融后４７．９％（３４／７２）用异丙肾上腺素评价，其中８例既有房室结跳跃现象又有心房回波的病人５０．０％（４／８）诱发出ＡＶＮＲＴ而重新消融。随访８．５±４．３个月，成功消融的７１例中，３４例经异丙肾上腺素评价者无一例复发，３７例未用异丙肾上腺素评价者２例复发。提示静脉滴注异丙肾上腺素可提高ＡＶＮＲＴ的诱发率；消融后房室结慢径前传功能存在时，无论有无心房回波均应用异丙肾上腺素评价，以确定消融终点和降低复发率。     

老年心血管病患者房颤反复发作的预测

目的　为明确老年心血管疾病患者窦性心律时发生阵发性房颤的危险因素并寻找反复心房颤动发作的预测因子。方法　测量 71例有阵发性房颤发作史的老年心血管疾病患者 (PAF组 )及 73例无阵发性房颤发作史的老年心血管疾病患者 (对照组 )窦性心律时的 12导联ECG ,分别测定最大P波时限 (Pmax)及最小P波时限 (Pmin)并计算其P波离散度 (Pd) ,心脏超声测量左房内径 (LAD)和左室射血分数 (LVEF) ,随访PAF组房颤反复发作情况。结果　PAF组的Pd及Pmax分别为 ( 4 7.0 7± 12 .3 5 )ms和 ( 12 1.2 5± 13 .2 4)ms,较对照组明显延长 (P <0 .0 1) ;PAF组反复房颤发作者 ,Pd≥40ms时相对危险度 3 .3 3 ,Pmax≥ 110ms时相对危险度 2 .48。结论　窦性心律时Pd、Pmax增加是预测老年心血管病患者是否发生房颤及房颤反复发作的有效且无创的临床方法     

Long‐Term Outcome of Catheter Ablation in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Originating from Nonpulmonary Vein Ectopy

Long‐Term Outcome of NPV AF Ablation . Introduction: Data regarding the long‐term outcome of catheter ablation in patients with nonpulmonary vein (NPV) ectopy initiating atrial fibrillation (AF) are limited. We aimed to evaluate the long‐term result of patients with AF who had NPV triggers and underwent catheter ablation. Methods and Results: The study included 660 consecutive patients (age 54 ± 11 years old, 477 males) who had undergone catheter ablation for AF. Group 1 consisted of 132 patients with AF initiating from the NPV, and group 2 consisted of 528 patients with AF initiating from pulmonary vein (PV) triggers only. Patients from Group 1 were younger than those from Group 2 (51 ± 12 years old vs 54 ± 11 years old, P = 0.001) and were more likely to be females (34.4% vs 25.8%, P = 0.049). The incidences of nonparoxysmal AF (36.4% vs 16.3%, P < 0.001) and right atrial (RA) enlargement (31.3% vs 19%, P = 0.004) were higher, and the biatrial substrates were worse in Group 1 than those in Group 2 (left atrial voltage 1.5 ± 0.7 mV vs 1.9 ± 0.7 mV, P < 0.001, RA voltage 1.6 ± 0.5 mV vs 1.8 ± 0.6 mV, P = 0.014). During a follow‐up period of 46 ± 23 months, there was a higher AF recurrence rate in Group 1 than in Group 2 (57.6% vs 38.8%, P < 0.001). The independent predictors of AF recurrence were NPV trigger (P < 0.001, HR 2, 95% CI 1.4–2.85), nonparoxysmal AF (P = 0.021, HR 1.55, 95% CI 1.07–2.24), larger left atrial diameter (P = 0.002, HR 1.04, 95% CI 1.02–1.07) and worse left atrial substrate (P = 0.028, HR 1.3, 95% CI 1.03–1.64). Conclusion: Compared to AF originating from the PV alone, AF originating from the NPV ectopy showed a worse outcome. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 24, pp. 250‐258, March 2013)     

Why is Warfarin Underutilized in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation?

BACKGROUND: Identification of patients at risk for PAF recurrence after AP ablation is important because of the necessity for additional therapies. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether Maximum P-wave duration (Pmax) and P-wave dispersion (Pd ) detected on surface ECG after successful accessory pathway (AP) ablation can predict the recurrence of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). METHODS: Seventy-eight patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) syndrome who had at least one documented PAF episode and underwent catheter ablation were enrolled. Pmax, minimum P-wave duration (Pmin) and Pd were determined on a surface ECG recorded on a high resolution computer screen on day 2 after ablation of the AP. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in terms of basic clinical data and electrophysiological findings between patients with (Group-1, n = 19) and without (Group-2, n = 59) recurrence of PAF during follow-up of 21 +/- 10 months. Pmax and Pd were significantly higher in Group-1 than Group-2 (120 +/- 15 vs. 96 +/- 10 ms and 47 +/- 12 vs. 25 +/- 7 ms, respectively; p < 0.001 for both). Pmin didn't differ significantly. A Pmax value of > or = 103 ms separated Group-1 from Group-2 with a sensitivity of 84.2%, specificity of 72.9%, positive predictive value of 50%, and negative predictive value of 93.5%. A Pd value of > or = 32.5 ms separated Group-1 from Group-2 with a sensitivity of 89.5%, specificity of 84.7%, positive predictive value of 65.4%, and negative predictive value of 96.2%. Pmax (p < 0.010) and Pd (p < 0.001) were found to be significant univariate predictors of PAF, whereas only Pd remained significant in multivariate analysis (p = 0.037). CONCLUSION: Pd > or = 32.5 ms and Pmax > or = 103.0 ms predict the recurrence of PAF after ablation with acceptable positive and negative predictive values. Pd > or = 32.5 ms is an independent predictor of recurrence of PAF after catheter ablation in patients with WPW syndrome.     

快慢型房室结折返性心动过速的电生理特点

目的分析快慢型房室结折返性心动过速（AVNRT）患者的临床特征、心电网和电生理检查特点、射频消融治疗特点,旨在为临床长RP。心动过速鉴别提供帮助。方法11例经心内电生理检查证实为慢快型房室结折返性心动过速的患者,回顾性分析其临床特征、心电图特点及电生理检查特点及射频消融治疗。结果心动过速表现为窄QRs波心动过速,RP’〉P’R,P。在Ⅱ、Ⅲ、aVF导联倒置,RP’间期为350±25ms,心率为1664-30bpm。11例患者中有3例出现室房逆传跳跃现象。心房程序刺激无明显跳跃现象,11例均可由心房StS：刺激诱发心动过速发作,且容易诱发,容易终止。心动过速发作时,5例CS9．10A波最早,6例HiS的A波最早,其中1例静推ATP心动过速终止。11例患者中9例经房室结改良消融传统慢径获得成功,2例在冠状静脉窦内消融成功,术后随访3个月以上均未再发作心动过速。结论长RP’心动过速的诊断和鉴别诊断有一定困难,如能排除慢旁道和房速,应考虑快慢型房室结折返性心动过速。     

PR/RR Interval Ratio During Rapid Atrial Pacing:

Method for Confirming Slow Pathway Conduction. Introduction: Although the AV conduction curve in patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is usually discontinuous, many patients with this arrhythmia do not demonstrate criteria for dual AV nodal pathways. During rapid atrial pacing, the PR interval often exceeds the pacing cycle length when there is anterograde conduction over the slow pathway and AVNRT is induced. The purpose of this prospective study was to determine the diagnostic value of the ratio of the PR interval to the RR interval during rapid atrial pacing as an indicator of anterograde slow pathway conduction in patients undergoing electrophysioiogic testing. Methods and Results: The PR and RR intervals were measured during rapid atrial pacing at the maximum rate with consistent 1:1 AV conduction in four study groups: (1) patients with inducible AV nodal reentry and the classical criterion for dual AV nodal pathways during atrial extrastimulus testing (AVNRT Group 1); (2) patients with inducible AV nodal reentry without dual AV nodal pathways (AVNRT Group 2); (3) control subjects ≤ 60 years of age without inducible AV nodal reentry; and (4) control subjects > 60 years of age without inducible AV nodal reentry. For both groups of patients with inducible AV nodal reentry, AV conduction was assessed before and after radiofrequency ablation of the slow AV nodal pathway. Before slow pathway ablation, the PR/RR ratio exceeded 1.0 in 12 of 13 AVNRT Group 1 patients (mean 1.27 ± 0.21) and 16 of 17 AVNRT Group 2 patients (mean 1.18 ± 0.15, P = NS Group 1 vs Group 2). After slow pathway ablation, the maximum PR/RR ratio was < 1.0 in all AVNRT patients (Group 1 = 0.59 ± 0.08, P < 0. 00001 vs before ablation: Group 2 = 0.67 ± 0.11; P < 0.00001 vs before ablation). Among both groups of control subjects, the PR/RR ratio was > 1.0 in only 3 of 27 patients with no relation to patient age. Conclusion: The ratio of the PR interval to the RR interval during rapid atrial pacing at the maximum rate with consistent 1:1 AV conduction provides a simple and clinically useful method for determining the presence of slow AV nodal pathway conduction. This finding may be particularly useful in patients with inducible AV nodal reentry without dual AV nodal physiology on atrial extrastimulus testing.     

Mechanisms for atrial fibrillation in patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome

INTRODUCTION: Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) frequently occurs in patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) syndrome. To elucidate the mechanisms for PAF, we performed electrophysiologic studies (EPS) before and after ablation of accessory pathways (APs). METHODS AND RESULTS: We investigated 24 patients with WPW syndrome who had AV reciprocating tachycardia and prior PAF and had undergone successful ablation of APs. Patients in whom atrial fibrillation (AF) was induced by EPS at day 7 after ablation were considered the inducible AF group (n = 14), and patients in whom AF was not induced by EPS at day 7 after ablation were considered the noninducible AF group (n = 10). Fifteen patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) but without PAF who underwent ablation of the slow AV nodal pathways served as the control group (AVNRT group). Maximal atrial conduction delay and conduction delay zone, which are indices of atrial vulnerability, were measured before and after ablation. Before ablation, maximal atrial conduction delay and conduction delay zone were significantly greater (P < 0.0001 and P < 0.0001, respectively) in the two WPW syndrome groups than in the AVNRT group, indicating increased atrial vulnerability in WPW syndrome with PAF. After ablation, these parameters did not change in the inducible AF group, whereas they were significantly (P < 0.0001) decreased in the noninducible AF group and were not different from those in the AVNRT group, indicating normalized atrial vulnerability in the noninducible AF group after ablation. The prospective study demonstrated that PAF recurred only in the inducible AF group during long-term follow-up (17+/-7 months). CONCLUSION: The findings of this study suggest that there are two mechanisms of PAF in patients with WPW syndrome: one mechanism is reversible and AP-dependent atrial vulnerability, and the other is intrinsic and AP-independent atrial vulnerability.     

寻找慢径最早心房出口射频消融治疗快-慢型房室结折返性心动过速

探讨快 慢型房室结折返性心动过速 (AVNRT)射频消融治疗的方法学。 7例快 慢型AVNRT患者 ,在心动过速发作时 ,寻找慢径最早心房出口作为靶点行射频消融治疗。6例消融成功。与冠状静脉窦口 (CSp)相比 ,成功靶点A波提前程度平均为 9.8± 1.3ms。手术时间 87± 2 4min ,X线曝光时间 2 7± 12min ,无并发症 ,随访无 1例复发。结论 :激动标测寻找最早心房出口点作为消融靶点 ,是射频消融治疗快 慢型AVNRT安全有效的方法     

Does Impaired Left Ventricular Relaxation Affect P Wave Dispersion in Patients with Hypertension?

Objective: P wave dispersion (PD) is considered to reflect the heterogeneous conduction in atria. We investigated whether there was a correlation between the left ventricular (LV) relaxation and PD. Method and Results: Fifty‐three hypertensive patients ≤60 years old were divided into two groups: Group A, 27 patients, aged 54 ± 5 years with the impaired LV relaxation and Group B, 26 patients, aged 51 ± 8 years with normal LV relaxation. The P wave durations were measured in all 12 leads of ECG and PD was defined as the difference between maximum and minimum P wave duration (Pmax?Pmin). Mitral inflow velocities (E and A), E deceleration time (DT), isovolumic relaxation time (IVRT), left atrial and ventricular diameters, and wall thickness of LV were obtained by echocardiography. Clinical characteristics of both groups were comparable. The wall thickness of LV, Pmax, and left atrial dimension were not different in both groups. A velocity was higher (P < 0.001) , but E velocity (P = 0.03) and E/A ratio (P < 0.001) were lower in group A than in group B. IVRT and DT were also significantly longer in group A. PD was significantly higher in group A compared to group B (51 ± 9 vs 41 ± 11 ms, P = 0.01) . This difference resulted from the Pmin (61 ± 10 vs 67 ± 9 ms, P = 0.03 , respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed a significant correlation between PD and A velocity (r = 0.46, P = 0.01) , E/A ratio (r =?0.53, P = 0.001) , DT (r = 0.65, P < 0.001) , and IVRT (r = 0.73, P < 0.001) . Conclusion: This study suggests that impaired LV relaxation contributes to the heterogeneous atrial conduction in hypertensive patients.     

Electrophysiological characteristics and catheter ablation in patients with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

Introduction: Paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT) is often associated with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the relationship between PSVT and AF is still unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical and electrophysiological characteristics in patients with PSVT and AF, and to demonstrate the origin of the AF before the radiofrequency (RF) ablation of AF.
Methods and Results: Four hundred and two consecutive patients with paroxysmal AF (338 had a pure PV foci and 64 had a non-PV foci) that underwent RF ablation were included. Twenty-one patients (10 females; mean age 47 ± 18 years) with both PSVT and AF were divided into two groups. Group 1 consisted of 14 patients with inducible atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) and AF. Group 2 consisted of seven patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) syndrome and AF. Patients with non-PV foci of AF had a higher incidence of AVNRT than those with PV foci (11% vs. 2%, P = 0.003). Patients with AF and atypical AVNRT had a higher incidence of AF ectopy from the superior vena cava (SVC) than those with AF and typical AVNRT (86% vs. 14%, P = 0.03). Group 1 patients had smaller left atrial (LA) diameter (36 ± 3 vs. 41 ± 3 mm, P = 0.004) and higher incidence of an SVC origin of AF (50% vs. 0%, P = 0.047) than did those in Group 2.
Conclusion: The SVC AF has a close relationship with AVNRT. The effect of atrial vulnerability and remodeling may differ between AVNRT and WPW syndrome.     

房室结慢径区域消融对迷走神经功能及心房颤动易感性的影响

目的心房颤动（房颤）与房室结折返性心动过速有着某种程度的关联性,慢径区域消融可能影响了心房自主神经功能而导致窦性心动过速。但慢径区消融对心房自主神经功能的具体影响目前尚不清楚。本文旨在探讨慢径区消融对心房迷走神经调节功能及房颤易感性的影响。方法11条成年杂种犬,全身麻醉下行颈交感一迷走神经干剥离术。经右颈内静脉穿刺放置冠状静脉窦导管,经左股静脉穿刺放置右心室导管及右心房标测电极导管（Halo导管）,经右股静脉穿刺放置消融导管和希氏束导管。静脉应用美托洛尔阻断交感神经活性。测量慢径区域消融前后基础状态及迷走神经刺激下的窦性周长（SCL）及高位右心房（HRA）、低位右心房（IRA）、冠状静脉窦近端（CSp）和冠状静脉窦远端（CSd）的有效不应期（ERP）及心房易感窗口（VW）。结果（1）SCL的变化：消融前后迷走神经刺激导致的SCL缩短值无明显改变[（107±19）次／min对（108±8）次／min,P〉0．05],提示慢径区域消融没有明显改变迷走神经对窦房结的调节作用。（2）ERP的变化：消融前后迷走神经刺激导致的ERP缩短值在HRA分别为[（69±37）ms对（55±34）ms,P〉0．05],CSd分别为[（55±30）ms对（42±32）ms,P=0．08],IRA分别为[（66±24）ms对（19±21）ms,P〈0．001],CSp分别为[（46±24）ms对（7±18）ms,P〈0．001]。提示慢径区域消融对HRA及窦房结区域的迷走神经调节功能无明显影响,对CSd区域的迷走神经调节功能有一定的影响,而导致了IRA及CSp区域去迷走神经效应。（3）心房VW的变化：消融前后基础状态下各个部位刺激均较难诱发房颤（VW接近0）。消融后,HRA迷走神经刺激诱发房颤的能力较消融前没有明显变化[（63±31）ms对（63±25）ms,P〉0．05],CSd的VW有一定程度的降低[（35±37）ms对（57±28）ms,P     

射频消融慢径后心动过速复发与房室结电生理特性变化的关系

为揭示房室结折返性心动过速（ＡＶＮＲＴ）复发的机制，对４５例射频消融治疗成功的慢－快型ＡＶＮＲＴ患者在消融术前、术后即刻及术后逾三个月行电生理检查。结果１０例复发（复发组）。复发组术前心房早搏刺激时的最大心房－Ｈｉｓ束间期（Ａ２Ｈ２ｍａｘ）较非复发组明显延长（４１３±６０ｍｓｖｓ３１１±１１０ｍｓ，Ｐ＜０．０１）；两组术后即刻Ａ２Ｈ２ｍａｘ较术前均明显缩短（Ｐ均＜０．０１）；术后三个月复发组的Ａ２Ｈ２ｍａｘ较术后即刻明显延长（３５６±９３ｍｓｖｓ２９８±９６ｍｓ，Ｐ＜０．０５），非复发组则有进一步缩短趋势，两组术后三个月的Ａ２Ｈ２ｍａｘ比较有显著性差异（３５６±９３ｍｓｖｓ２２２±７３ｍｓ，Ｐ＜０．００５）；非复发组术后三个月Ａ２Ｈ２ｍａｘ较术前明显缩短（２２２±７３ｍｓｖｓ３１１±１１０ｍｓ，Ｐ＜０．０１），房室结前传文氏周期及有效不应期较术前明显延长（４０５±９１ｍｓｖｓ３６６±８４ｍｓ，３３２±７５ｍｓｖｓ２６９±６３ｍｓ，Ｐ＜０．０１及＜０．０００１），复发组消融术前后比较差异则无显著性。结果提示部分ＡＶＮＲＴ复发可能与其房室结本身电生理特性有关，基础状态下Ａ２Ｈ２ｍａｘ长的患者心动过速更易复发。