Decompression and transposition of the pudendal nerve in pudendal neuralgia: a randomized controlled trial and long-term evaluation

BACKGROUND: We assess that pudendal neuralgia is a tunnel syndrome due to a ligamentous entrapment of the pudendal nerve and have treated 400 patients surgically since 1987. We have had no major complication. We conducted a randomized controlled trial to evaluate our procedure. METHODS: A sequential, randomized controlled trial to compare decompression of the pudendal nerve with non-surgical treatment. Patients aged 18-70, had chronic, uni/bilateral perineal pain, positive temporary response to blocks at the ischial spine and in Alcock's canal. They were randomly assigned to surgery (n=16) and control (n=16) groups. Primary end point was improvement at 3 months following surgery or assignment to the non-surgery group. Secondary end points were improvement at 12 months and at 4 years following surgical intervention. RESULTS: A significantly higher proportion of the surgery group was improved at 3 months. On intention-to-treat analysis 50% of the surgery group reported improvement in pain at 3 months versus 6.2% of the non-surgery group (p=.0155); in the analysis by treatment protocol the figures were 57.1% versus 6.7% (p=.0052). At 12 months, 71.4% of the surgery group compared with 13.3% of the non-surgery group were improved, analyzing by treatment protocol (p=.0025). Only those randomized to surgery were evaluated at 4 years: 8 remained improved at 4 years. No complications were encountered. CONCLUSIONS: In this study we demonstrate that decompression of the pudendal nerve is an effective and safe treatment for cases of chronic pudendal neuralgia that have been unresponsive to analgesia and nerve blocks. Following surgery, other medical interventions may be necessary.     

Perineal pain

The investigation of patients suffering from perineal pain when sitting led us to perform an anatomical study of the pudendal nerve. We dissected 50 cadavers and found areas of conflict for the nerve fibers. The nerve trunk can become entrapped at the level of the ischiatic spine, in the Alcock's canal and when it crosses the falciform process. Considering the clinical and neurophysiological data, this type of chronic pain may arise from compression of the nerve between the sacro-tuberal and the sacro-spinal ligaments, and/or in the fascia of the internal obturator muscle. Much like treatment of entrapment of the median nerve in the wrist, we decided to treat chronic perineal pain by nerve blocks, and later by surgery. We describe here the clinical symptoms, the neurophysiological data, and the technique of the nerve blocks. For patients with persistent pain, we propose a posterior surgical approach which has provided successful pain relief in two third of patients.     

Diagnostic criteria for pudendal neuralgia by pudendal nerve entrapment (Nantes criteria)

AIMS: The diagnosis of pudendal neuralgia by pudendal nerve entrapment syndrome is essentially clinical. There are no pathognomonic criteria, but various clinical features can be suggestive of the diagnosis. We defined criteria that can help to the diagnosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A working party has validated a set of simple diagnostic criteria (Nantes criteria). RESULTS: The five essentials diagnostic criteria are: (1) Pain in the anatomical territory of the pudendal nerve. (2) Worsened by sitting. (3) The patient is not woken at night by the pain. (4) No objective sensory loss on clinical examination. (5) Positive anesthetic pudendal nerve block. Other clinical criteria can provide additional arguments in favor of the diagnosis of pudendal neuralgia. Exclusion criteria are also proposed: purely coccygeal, gluteal, or hypogastric pain, exclusively paroxysmal pain, exclusive pruritus, presence of imaging abnormalities able to explain the symptoms. CONCLUSION: The diagnosis of pudendal neuralgia by pudendal nerve entrapment syndrome is essentially clinical. There are no specific clinical signs or complementary test results of this disease. However, a combination of criteria can be suggestive of the diagnosis.     

Pudendal neuralgia after pelvic surgery using mesh: Case reports and laparoscopic pudendal nerve decompression

Persistent pain after vaginal mesh surgery is a rare and agonizing entity that has devastating consequences for the patient's quality of life. Many etiologies have been blamed including nerve injuries and entrapments. Pudendal neuralgia is a rare chronic neuropathic pain syndrome in the anatomical territory of the pudendal nerve. Various treatment options, such as medication management, physiotherapy, nerve blocks, decompression surgery and neuromodulation, have been used, but the most appropriate treatment for pudendal neuralgia has not yet been determined. In this article, we present two cases of postoperative pelvic pain thought to be secondary to injury or mechanical distortion of the pudendal nerve after rectocele repair using mesh and tension‐free vaginal tape sling. In cases of failed conservative treatment and of mesh removal surgery, laparoscopic pudendal nerve decompression and omental flap wrapping operation can be a treatment option for pudendal neuralgia.     

Pudendal nerve entrapment in an Ironman athlete: a case report

Objective

To present the diagnostic and clinical features of pudendal nerve entrapment and create awareness amongst clinicians of this rare and painful condition.

Clinical Features

A 41-year old male ironman athlete complaining of insidious constant penis pain 12–24h after long distance cycling and pain after sexual intercourse. A diagnosis of “cyclist syndrome” also known as pudendal nerve entrapment was made.

Intervention and outcome

Patient was treated twice a week for four weeks using the soft tissue protocol described by Active Release Technique^® to the obturator internus muscle. After two weeks of treatment his pain decreased to a 5/10 on the pain intensity scale and he began to cycle again. After four weeks of treatment his pain had decreased to 1/10 in intensity and he continued to cycle. At follow-up, approximately 8 weeks and 12 weeks later the patient communicated that his pain is resolved and he has began to train for Ironman Lake Placid 2010.

Conclusion

Pudendal nerve entrapment is a rare, painful condition and is often misdiagnosed due to the fact that the clinical manifestations can mimic other pathologies. It is important to be aware of the clinical features to obtain appropriate diagnosis and treatment of this condition promptly.     

The clinical features of,and microendoscopic decompression for,extraforaminal entrapment of the L5 spinal nerve

Objective: To evaluate the clinical results of, and surgical techniques for, microendoscopic (METRx) decompression of extraforaminal entrapment of the L5 spinal nerve at the lumbosacral tunnel. Methods: Five patients with extraforaminal entrapment of the L5 spinal nerve in the lumbosacral tunnel were treated in our department, including three men and two women. The average age was 65.6 years. All patients suffered severe leg pain and neurological deficits compatible with L5 radiculopathy. Minimally invasive decompression of the L5 spinal nerve was performed under METRx intertransverse decompression. Results: With an average follow‐up of 17.8 months, clinical results were assessed based on Nakai criteria and Visual Analogue scale (VAS). All patients experienced immediate pain relief postoperatively. Clinical outcomes were excellent in three patients and good in two. The average intraoperative blood loss was 59 ml, with an average operative time of 103 min. Average post‐operative stay in bed was 7 days, and average cost was $1860. Conclusion: Extraforaminal entrapment of the L5 spinal nerve in the lumbosacral tunnel can cause L5 radiculopathy. METRx partial resection of the L5 transverse processes, sacral ala and osteophytes of L5‐S1 vertebral bodies to relieve extraforaminal entrapment of the L5 spinal nerve is a very effective and minimally invasive surgical option.     

Actualización del síndrome de atrapamiento del nervio pudendo: enfoque anatómico-quirúrgico,diagnóstico y terapéutico

IntroductionThe syndrome of pudendal nerve entrapment (SANP) is widely unknown and often misdiagnosed or confused with other diseases. It was first described by Amarenco in 1987. The classic clinical manifestation is pudendal neuralgia, a neuropathic pain in the genital area.ObjectivesTo make known its existence to the urology professionals through a systematic review of existing literature and its potential for diagnosis and treatment.Materials and methodsWe performed a literature search through the database “Pubmed” using the terms “Pudendal nerve”, “Pudendal nerve entrapment syndrome,” “Pelvic floor neuropathic pain”, “Pelvic floor myofascial syndrome,” “Pudendal nerve decompression”. Also, selected works in English, Spanish and French, also reviewing the articles relate this work.ResultsWe develop the highlights of the syndrome: anatomy, etiology, pathophysiology, clinical diagnosis, ecodoppler of internal pudendal artery, electrophysiological studies, diagnostic criteria, medical therapy, physical therapy treatments and surgery.ConclusionIt is an uncommon cause of pain in the pelvic floor and greatly affects quality of life of patients. Today, we have diagnostic and therapeutic tools that allow us to treat this disabling syndrome with good results.     

Voiding reflex in chronic spinal cord injured cats induced by stimulating and blocking pudendal nerves

AIMS: To induce efficient voiding in chronic spinal cord injured (SCI) cats. METHODS: Voiding reflexes induced by bladder distension or by electrical stimulation and block of pudendal nerves were investigated in chronic SCI cats under alpha-chloralose anesthesia. RESULTS: The voiding efficiency in chronic SCI cats induced by bladder distension was very poor compared to that in spinal intact cats (7.3 +/- 0.9% vs. 93.6 +/- 2.0%, P < 0.05). In chronic SCI cats continuous stimulation of the pudendal nerve on one side at 20 Hz induced large amplitude bladder contractions, but failed to induce voiding. However, continuous pudendal nerve stimulation (20 Hz) combined with high-frequency (10 kHz) distal blockade of the ipsilateral pudendal nerve elicited efficient (73.2 +/- 10.7%) voiding. Blocking the pudendal nerves bilaterally produced voiding efficiency (82.5 +/- 4.8%) comparable to the efficiency during voidings induced by bladder distension in spinal intact cats, indicating that the external urethral sphincter (EUS) contraction was caused not only by direct activation of the pudendal efferent fibers, but also by spinal reflex activation of the EUS through the contralateral pudendal nerve. The maximal bladder pressure and average flow rate induced by stimulation and bilateral pudendal nerve block in chronic SCI cats were also comparable to those in spinal intact cats. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that after the spinal cord is chronically isolated from the pontine micturition center, bladder distension evokes a transient, inefficient voiding reflex, whereas stimulation of somatic afferent fibers evokes a strong, long duration, spinal bladder reflex that elicits efficient voiding when combined with blockade of somatic efferent fibers in the pudendal nerves.     

Pudendal nerve decompression in perineology : a case series

Background  

Perineodynia (vulvodynia, perineal pain, proctalgia), anal and urinary incontinence are the main symptoms of the pudendal canal syndrome (PCS) or entrapment of the pudendal nerve. The first aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of bilateral pudendal nerve decompression (PND) on the symptoms of the PCS, on three clinical signs (abnormal sensibility, painful Alcock's canal, painful "skin rolling test") and on two neurophysiological tests: electromyography (EMG) and pudendal nerve terminal motor latencies (PNTML). The second aim was to study the clinical value of the aforementioned clinical signs in the diagnosis of PCS.     

Cubital tunnel syndrome. Treatment by decompression without transposition of ulnar nerve.

Cubital tunnel syndrome is the second most common entrapment neuropathy in the upper limb; however, surgical treatment of the ulnar nerve entrapment at the elbow remains controversial. None of the presently advocated procedures (simple decompression of the ulnar nerve, medial epicondylectomy, subcutaneous, submuscular or intramuscular anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve) has proven optimal regarding long-term results. This paper presents the experience of treating cubital tunnel syndrome with simple decompression in 40 patients. Three months after surgery 23/36 patients did not feel any pain in their operated hands. In 11/36 cases we observed an improvement of preoperative pain. Sensory disturbances disappeared completely in 24/40 cases. 11/40 patients reported an improvement of preoperative dysesthesia or hypesthesia. In 12/22 patients we observed complete recovery of preoperative pareses of adductor muscle of thumb or hypothenar muscles weakness. 7/22 cases demonstrated an improvement of these pareses. In total 28 patients (70 %) had an excellent outcome without residual symptoms. For 5 patients treatment results were classified as good with slight residual pain and sensory disturbance (12.5 %). In 4 cases (10 %) we only observed a fair outcome with persistent severe sensory and motor deficits but slow improvement over the last three months. Three patients did not demonstrate any improvement (7.5 %). The mean duration of postoperative disablement in our working patients (18/40) was 28 days. In summary, simple decompression of the ulnar nerve seems to be an adequate and successful minimally invasive technique for the treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome.     

Predicting outcome in the surgical treatment of lumbar radiculopathy using the Pain Drawing Score, McGill Short Form Pain Questionnaire, and risk factors including psychosocial issues and axial joint pain.

BACKGROUND: The surgical decompression of a symptomatic lumbar nerve root is generally regarded as effective treatment for radiculopathy. Nevertheless this straightforward surgical procedure is not universally successful, and the results are often independent of technical factors. PURPOSE: To identify tools and risk factors that would permit the preoperative determination of the probability for an acceptable surgical result. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective consecutive nonrandomized study evaluating the short-term result (average 12 months follow-up) of the surgical decompression of a single spinal nerve. PATIENT SAMPLE: 110 adult patients who had failed conservative treatment were carefully selected after identification of predominate symptoms secondary to disc herniation, synovial cyst, or foramenal stenosis due to spondylosis. OUTCOME MEASURES: A combination of 6 measurement tools were used: the visual analogue scale (VAS); the McGill Sensory Score; the McGill Affective Score; the Prolo Economic Score; the Prolo Functional Score; and the Modified Ransford Pain Drawing Score. METHODS: Preoperatively and at each post-op visit the patients completed the entire battery of outcome tools. Comorbidities were identified preoperatively as risk factors. Patient assessment of outcome was determined in two ways: a 50% or greater reduction in VAS; or using a 4 step scale combining the Prolo scores. Surgeon assessment of outcome was determined subjectively using clinical criteria. RESULTS: All 6 measurement tools showed statistically significant improvement postoperatively. The change in pain drawing score has not been previously demonstrated in the literature. Correlation testing showed association between compensation claim, psychiatric factor, and high preoperative pain drawing score on several post-op measurements. Stepwise regression analysis revealed preoperative axial joint pain to be a determinant of outcome in addition to the psychosocial issues. Although the distribution of outcome grades was different between surgeon and patient assessment, relative risk analysis showed that the factors predicting outcome were identical, and the rank order of importance in these risk factors was almost identical. Using patient assessment of outcome there was no probability of a good or excellent outcome in the presence of either psychiatric factor or personal injury claim, and only a 23% chance with a compensation case. Axial joint pain is obviously not treatable by nerve root decompression, and if present will also be an important negative risk factor, reducing the probability to 27%. The evaluation of the preoperative pain drawing using a Modified Ransford Score is not useful as a predictor of psychiatric factor nor should it be used as a substitute for psychological evaluation. Nevertheless a preoperative score >or=3 or higher reduced the probability of an excellent or good outcome (as determined by patient assessment using combined Prolo scores) to 55%. Additionally a high preoperative McGill Sensory score >or=17 or a high preoperative McGill Affective Score >or=7 also had profound negative effects, reducing the probability of acceptable outcome to 50% and 42%, respectively. These threshold values for the McGill scores correspond to one standard deviation above the normal range previously validated in the literature. CONCLUSION: Although psychosocial issues (psychiatric factor, personal injury litigation, compensation claim) are well known to affect outcome, the strength and magnitude of their negative effects was surprising. The short form McGill Pain Questionnaire can be used not only as an outcome tool, but also as a predictor of result. The pain drawing has similar utility, but it should not be used as a substitute for psychiatric evaluation. The numerous issues exerting profound effects on the outcome of a relatively simple operation suggest that specific attention be directed at them when evaluating more complex surgical procedures. Although large randomized samples might obviate this concern, it is possible that some of these factors are too powerful to be ignored.     

Painful entrapment of the lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve at the elbow

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to report the diagnosis and management of entrapment neuropathy of the lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve (LABCN) presenting as lateral elbow pain. METHODS: Twenty-three patients with lateral elbow pain were diagnosed with entrapment of the LABCN. Six patients also had paresthesia of the distal forearm. Diagnosis was made by clinical evaluation and confirmed with diagnostic injection of 1% lidocaine. Electrodiagnostic evaluation was positive in all patients. All patients were treated conservatively. Seven patients improved and 16 patients had surgical decompression of the LABCN at the elbow and distal arm with partial resection of the lateral margin of the biceps tendon. Postoperative follow-up evaluation averaged 45 months. RESULTS: Fourteen patients had complete relief of pain and 2 patients continued to have minimal to mild pain. Of the 6 patients who had preoperative paresthesia only 1 patient had persistent mild paresthesia of the radial side of the distal forearm. Range of motion and grip and pinch strength returned to normal values. All patients returned to their preoperative daily and work activities. CONCLUSIONS: Entrapment neuropathy of the LABCN should be considered in the differential diagnosis of elbow pain. Electrodiagnostic evaluation can be very useful in establishing and confirming the diagnosis. Surgical treatment of patients who do not respond to conservative treatment is simple yet effective in improving the patients' symptoms. Patients who present with paresthesia usually require surgical intervention because paresthesia represents a more progressive stage of the nerve entrapment.     

Inter-carpal soft tissue entrapment. A possible explanation for chronic dorsal wrist pain

This retrospective study evaluates the surgical treatment of a group of patients with unknown chronic dorsal wrist pain. The cause of their symptoms was interpreted as a painful entrapment of fibrous tissue in the radio-carpal and inter-carpal joints during specific movements. Between 1997 and 2001, 30 patients were treated by surgical excision of this tissue and 26 patients were traced for follow-up. Twenty-three patients were symptom free, or experienced major benefit from surgery. Wrist function measurements using the VAS scale showed improvement in 24 patients. Microscopic examination of the removed specimen shows fibrous tissue with non-specific changes. Inter-carpal soft tissue entrapment can explain the typical clinical findings in some patients with unknown chronic dorsal wrist pain. After careful selection, surgical excision of all entrapped tissue in the radio-carpal and mid-carpal joint may give relief of pain and improvement of wrist function.     

退变性腰椎管狭窄减压术后下肢疼痛的恢复规律及影响因素

目的观察退变性腰椎管狭窄（degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis, DLSS）减压术后下肢疼痛的恢复规律,并探索影响疼痛恢复的相关因素。方法回顾性分析2013年1月至2014年12月于我科行腰椎管减压术治疗DLSS的153例患者。记录不同时间（术前、术后第1~7天、术后第1~12个月）患者的下肢疼痛视觉模拟量表（visual analogue scale, VAS）评分,观察其变化规律。选择年龄、性别、术前腰椎稳定性、术前VAS评分、手术节段、减压术式作为可能的影响因素,以有序Logistic回归分析影响术后下肢疼痛缓解的相关因素。结果下肢疼痛在减压术后即开始缓解,虽然在术后第2天出现疼痛反跳,但通过脱水及营养神经治疗,VAS评分在术后第5天恢复到术后第1天水平。术后3个月后疼痛缓解达到最佳,之后不再有明显变化。年龄、性别、术前VAS评分是影响椎管减压术后下肢疼痛改善的相关因素,而病程、手术节段、减压术式及术前腰椎稳定性与下肢疼痛改善无关。结论手术减压治疗DLSS术后下肢疼痛的恢复遵循一定规律,年轻、男性及术前疼痛程度较轻的患者实施腰椎管减压术后,其下肢疼痛恢复更好。     

Integration of myofascial trigger point release and paradoxical relaxation training treatment of chronic pelvic pain in men

PURPOSE: A perspective on the neurobehavioral component of the etiology of chronic prostatitis (CP) and chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CPPS) is emerging. We evaluated a new approach to the treatment of CP/CPPS with the Stanford developed protocol using myofascial trigger point assessment and release therapy (MFRT) in conjunction with paradoxical relaxation therapy (PRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 138 men with CP/CPPS refractory to traditional therapy were treated for at least 1 month with the MFRT/PRT protocol by a team comprising a urologist, physiotherapist and psychologist. Symptoms were assessed with a pelvic pain symptom survey (PPSS) and National Institutes of Health-CP Symptom Index. Patient reported perceptions of overall effects of therapy were documented on a global response assessment questionnaire. RESULTS: Global response assessments of moderately improved or markedly improved, considered clinical successes, were reported by 72% of patients. More than half of patients treated with the MFRT/PRT protocol had a 25% or greater decrease in pain and urinary symptom scores, as assessed by the PPSS. In those at the 50% or greater improvement level median scores decreased 69% and 80% for pain and urinary symptoms, respectively. The 2 scores decreased significantly by a median of 8 points when the 25% or greater improvement was first observed, that is after a median of 5 therapy sessions. PPSS and National Institutes of Health-CP Symptom Index showed similar levels of improvement after MFRT/PRT protocol therapy. CONCLUSIONS: This case study analysis indicates that MFRT combined with PRT represents an effective therapeutic approach for the management of CP/CPPS, providing pain and urinary symptom relief superior to that of traditional therapy.     

Lumbar zygapophysial (facet) joint radiofrequency denervation success as a function of pain relief during diagnostic medial branch blocks: a multicenter analysis.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: The publication of several recent studies showing minimal benefit for radiofrequency (RF) lumbar zygapophysial (l-z) joint denervation have led many investigators to reevaluate selection criteria. One controversial explanation for these findings is that the most commonly used cutoff value for selecting patients for l-z (facet) joint RF denervation, greater than 50% pain relief after diagnostic blocks, is too low and hence responsible for the high failure rate. PURPOSE: To compare l-z joint RF denervation success rates between the conventional greater than or equal to 50% pain relief threshold and the more stringently proposed greater than or equal to 80% cutoff for diagnostic medial branch blocks (MBB). STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Multicenter, retrospective clinical data analysis. PATIENT SAMPLE: Two hundred and sixty-two patients with chronic low back pain who underwent l-z RF denervation at three pain clinics. OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcome measures were greater than 50% pain relief based on visual analog scale or numerical pain rating score after RF denervation persisting at least 6 months postprocedure, and global perceived effect (GPE), which considered pain relief, satisfaction and functional improvement. METHODS: Data were garnered at three centers on 262 patients who underwent l-z RF denervation after obtaining greater than or equal to 50% pain relief after diagnostic MBB. Subjects were separated into those who received partial (greater than or equal to 50% but less than 80%) and near-complete (greater than or equal to 80%) pain relief from the MBB. Outcomes between groups were compared with multivariate analysis after controlling for 14 demographic and clinical variables. RESULTS: One hundred and forty-five patients obtained greater than or equal to 50% but less than 80% pain relief after diagnostic MBB, and 117 patients obtained greater than or equal to 80% relief. In the greater than or equal to 50% group, success rates were 52% and 67% based on pain relief and GPE, respectively. Among patients who experienced greater than 80% relief from diagnostic blocks, 56% obtained greater than or equal to 50% relief from RF denervation and 66% had a positive GPE. CONCLUSIONS: Using more stringent pain relief criteria when selecting patients for l-z joint RF denervation is unlikely to improve success rates, and may lead to misdiagnosis and withholding a potentially valuable treatment from good candidates.     

Percutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation in patients with chronic pelvic pain: a preliminary study

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the clinical effect of intermittent percutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) in patients with chronic pelvic pain (CPP). METHODS: A total of 15 patients (10 women and 5 men, mean age 60.0 years, range 41-78) with CPP were enrolled in an open prospective clinical trial. The patients had 12 weekly outpatient treatment sessions, each lasting 30 min. All patients were evaluated by history, physical as well as urological examination, the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain and urgency, the International Prostate Symptom Score, and a 3-day frequency-volume chart. RESULTS: After 12 weeks of PTNS, 9 (60%) and 3 patients (30%) had an improvement of >50% and 25-50% in the VAS score for pain, respectively. Six patients (40%) ended up with a mean VAS <3. Mean VAS for pain changed from 8.1 +/- 0.2 at baseline to 4.1 +/- 0.6 after 12 weeks of treatment (p < 0.01). Mean VAS for urgency changed from 4.5 +/- 1.0 at baseline to 2.7 +/- 0.7 after 12 weeks of treatment (p < 0.05). However, there was no statistically significant improvement in the International Prostate Symptom Score. There was no statistically significant difference in the number of voids and bladder volumes either. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that PTNS may improve pain symptoms for over half of the patients with CPP. Long-term follow-up studies are needed to verify these preliminary results.     

Patient outcome after common peroneal nerve decompression

OBJECT: This study examines common peroneal nerve decompression and its effect on nerve function. METHODS: Fifty-one peroneal nerve decompressions were retrospectively reviewed. All patients were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively for motor and sensory function of the peroneal nerve as well as for pain. RESULTS: Postoperatively, 40 (83%) of 48 patients who had preoperative motor weakness had improvement in motor function. Likewise, 23 (49%) of 47 patients who had sensory disturbances and 26 (84%) of 31 patients who had preoperative pain improved after surgical decompression of the peroneal nerve. CONCLUSIONS: Common peroneal nerve decompression is a useful procedure to improve sensation and strength as well as to decrease pain.     

Sacral nerve stimulation: an emerging treatment for faecal incontinence

Faecal incontinence is common, distressing to the patient and socially incapacitating. The treatment options depend on the severity and aetiology of incontinence. For mild cases of faecal incontinence, medical management and pelvic floor physiotherapy may be adequate. For more severe cases, surgery is often required. Patients who have a distinct sphincter defect are amenable to surgical repair. In many cases, there is a combination of diffuse structural damage of the anal sphincters with pudendal neuropathy. Conventional surgical repairs have a modest degree of success and the results tend to deteriorate with time. Neosphincter procedures such as artificial bowel sphincter and dynamic graciloplasty are potentially morbid and technically complex. Sacral nerve stimulation is innovative and has had a medium-term success with improvement of quality of life in over 80% of patients treated for faecal incontinence. These results are superior to other techniques in treating patients with severe refractory faecal incontinence, where current maximal therapy has failed. The technique is unique because there is a screening phase, which has a high predictive value. It is also associated with minimal complications that are usually minor. However, most published reports of sacral nerve stimulation for treatment of faecal incontinence were case studies and methods of assessing outcome were variable. Criteria for patient selection are evolving and are yet to be defined. The present paper critically reviews the publications to date on sacral nerve stimulation for treatment of faecal incontinence. This will form the basis for future evaluation of this emerging treatment of severe, intractable faecal incontinence. Randomized clinical trials like that of the Melbourne trial will further clarify the role and indications of sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence.     

Outpatient penile implantation with the patient under a novel method of crural block

Although local anaesthesia for penile implants has been substantially reported, its methodology, simplicity and reliability left room for improvement. We would like to report on an innovative penile crural block using local anaesthesia in patients who underwent penile implantation as outpatient surgery. From March 1987 to March 1991, a total of 21 organically impotent men, aged from 27 to 77 years, received penile prosthesis implantation. All these were performed under pudendal nerve block as an outpatient procedure. From August 1992 to January 2003 a proximal dorsal nerve block with peripenile infiltration and penile crural block was developed to replace the anaesthesia method of pudendal nerve blocks in 137 consecutive patients (aged from 35 to 83 years) undergoing penile implants. The anaesthetic effects and postoperative results with the crural block were very satisfactory. Common immediate side-effects included puncture of the vessels, subcutaneous ecchymosis, transient palpitations and dilation pain, but there were no significant late complications. In the group of pudendal nerve blockage, 42.9% patients (nine of 21) experienced severe aching pain over the perineum for 1-2 weeks postoperatively, whereas the newly developed method of crural block markedly reduced these adverse effects. This new anaesthetic method proved to be reliable, simple, and safe with fewer complications. It offers the advantages of less morbidity, preservation of patient's privacy, reduced adverse effects of anaesthesia, and a more-rapid return to activity with minimal complications.