Arachidonic acid and prostaglandin levels in dithranol erythema: time course study.

Atenolol 100 mg once daily and metoprolol SA 200 mg once daily were compared in 20 patients with mild to moderate hypertension, in a randomised, double-blind cross-over trial. Blood pressure and heart rate were compared at rest and during maximal exercise on a bicycle ergometer at 2 and 24 h post-dose. Blood pressure control was similar with both drugs, except at 2 h when systolic blood pressure was significantly lower with atenolol. Blood pressure and heart rate were less well controlled at 24 h than at 2 h with both drugs, but the majority of patients were still considered adequately controlled at 24 h. Atenolol and metoprolol SA can be considered equally effective in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension and can be recommended as a once daily regime.     

Comparison of two long-acting preparations of metoprolol with conventional metoprolol and atenolol in healthy men during chronic dosing.

1 Eight healthy men received two long-acting formulations of metoprolol 200 mg (SA Astra, SR Geigy), conventional metoprolol 200 mg and atenolol 100 mg once daily for 1 week each in balanced, crossover fashion. There was a washout period of at least a week between each phase. 2 On the last day of each phase, post-exercise heart rate was recorded at intervals and compared to pretreatment values. Plasma metoprolol concentrations were measured. 3 The mean AUC was similar after each of the three formulations of metoprolol (relative bioavailability of SA and SR v conventional was 97%) but with SA and SR metoprolol the time to peak was significantly delayed by about 2 h. 4 In comparison to conventional metoprolol only metoprolol SA was associated with significantly higher plasma metoprolol concentrations at the end of a dosing interval (mean values: conventional, 25 ng/ml, SR 37 ng/ml, SA 51 ng/ml). 5 Mean (+/- s.d.) reduction in exercise tachycardia at the end of a dosing interval was significantly greater with atenolol (14.8 +/- 4.5%) and metoprolol SA (13.7 +/- 10.3%) than with metoprolol SR (10 +/- 8.4%) and conventional metoprolol (8.2 +/- 7.1%). 6 The variability in beta-adrenoceptor blockade at 24 h was much greater with each of the three metoprolol formulations than that with atenolol. This was explained by the variability in metoprolol metabolism. 7 Oxidation phenotype testing with debrisoquine showed there were six extensive metabolisers and two poor metabolisers. The AUC, half-life and response to metoprolol at 24 h were much greater in poor metabolisers. Response to atenolol was not influenced by phenotype.     

Antianginal effects of atenolol and pindolol in patients with stable effort angina pectoris

A double blind, randomised crossover study with 20 patients was performed to compare the antianginal effects of atenolol 100 mg once daily and pindolol 5 mg thrice daily. After a placebo run-in period, 2 treatments were given for 2 wk each. The number of anginal attacks and the nitroglycerin (NTG) consumption were determined. During bicycle exercise testing, the systolic blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), double product and exercise tolerance were measured. Both drugs reduced the number of anginal attacks and NTG consumption relative to the placebo, with atenolol being more effective than pindolol. During exercise, both beta-blockers produced a slight increase in BP and HR compared to the placebo. HR attained with atenolol was lower than pindolol at the same workload. The total duration of exercise and the maximal tolerated workload were greater in atenolol than pindolol experiment. The special properties of beta-blockers, such as cardioselectivity or intrinsic sympathomimetic activity (ISA), may have clinical importance in the treatment of angina pectoris.     

Synergistic effects of atenolol and amlodipine for lowering and stabilizing blood pressure in 2K1C renovascular hypertensive rats

AIM: To test the synergistic effects of atenolol and amlodipine on lowering blood pressure (BP) and reducing blood pressure variability (BPV) in 2-kidney, one-clip (2K1C) renovascular hypertensive rats. METHODS: Forty-eight 2K1C renovascular hypertensive rats were randomly divided into 6 groups. They were respectively given 0.8% carboxymethylcellulose sodium (control), atenolol (10.0 mg/kg), amlodipine (1.0 mg/kg), and combined atenolol and amlodipine (low dose: 5.0+0.5 mg/kg; intermediate dose: 10.0+1.0 mg/kg; high dose: 20.0+2.0 mg/kg). The drugs were given via a catheter in a gastric fistula. BP was recorded for 25 h from 1 h before drug administration to 24 h after administration. RESULTS: Compared with BP before medication, all 3 doses of combined atenolol and amlodipine significantly decreased the BP at 24 h after administration, except for the low dose on diastolic BP. Compared with the control group, all 3 doses of combined atenolol and amlodipine significantly reduced the average BP levels for the 24 h period after administration; furthermore, the high and intermediate doses also significantly decreased the BPV levels for the same period. The q values calculated by probability sum analysis for systolic and diastolic BP for the 24 h period after administration were 2.29 and 1.45, respectively, and for systolic and diastolic BPV for the same period they were 1.41 and 1.60, respectively. CONCLUSION: There is significant synergism between atenolol and amlodipine in lowering and stabilizing BP in 2K1C renovascular hypertensive rats.     

Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic study of oral and intravenous penbutolol

The present study was done to establish the dose-response relationships for effects on heart rate and systolic and diastolic blood pressure, tolerance and plasma disappearance kinetics after large intravenous and oral doses of penbutolol. Twelve healthy volunteers were randomly allocated to receive penbutolol (n = 8) or placebo (n = 4) in this single blind, placebo-controlled investigation. The degree of beta-blockade was measured by standarized exercise tests at work loads selected to produce a heart rate of 150/min without treatment. Penbutolol was given as single i.v. doses of 3, 6 and 12 mg and as 40, 80 and 120 mg once daily for one week, measurements being made 2 and 24 h after the last dose. Penbutolol i.v. did not influence the resting heart rate but it did reduce resting systolic blood pressure in a non-dose dependent manner. Exercise heart rate and systolic pressure were lowered by all the intravenous doses. All oral doses of penbutolol lowered exercise heart rate and systolic blood pressure to the same extent. The reductions in exercise tachycardia was still present after 24 h. After i.v. administration t1/2 was approximately 1.2 h and the volume of distribution was 32-421. All doses were well tolerated.     

长效硝苯地平与长效美托洛尔的动态降压作用比较

12例原发性高血压患者(男性5例,女性7例;年龄40±4a)自身交叉服用长效硝苯地平(下称Nif)20mg, qm×2wk;长效美托洛尔(下称Met)0.1g, qm×2wk。结果:踏车运动试验时服Njf者血压及心率明显升高;但服Met者能平稳地控制血压及心率。24h动态血压中平均动脉压在服上述2药后均显著下降(P<0.05),服Met者舒张压、心率下降较明显(P<0.05),且不良反应小,故Met优于Nif。     

Subjective symptoms and pharmacokinetics/dynamics of metoprolol CR in elderly subjects — a comparison with atenolol

Summary In a double-blind, randomised, cross-over study, the pharmacokinetic/dynamic effects and subjective symptoms of a new controlled-release (CR) formulation of metoprolol (50 and 100 mg) have been compared with atenolol (50 mg) and placebo in 20 elderly healthy subjects.The metoprolol CR formulation displayed an even plasma concentration-time profile over the dosage interval while atenolol produced a peak at 2–4 h. All three active treatments produced significant ₁-blockade at 24 h compared to placebo. Four hours after dose intake, the degree of ₁-blockade was significantly greater with conventional atenolol 50 mg than with either dose of metoprolol CR. Subjective well-being was examined with a self-administered questionnaire (MSE-profile), including three dimensions: Contentment, Vitality and Sleep. No significant differences were detected between placebo and either dose of metoprolol CR. At 2 h, following atenolol, a deterioration in Vitality was observed compared to placebo and metoprolol CR 100 mg. At the end of the dosage interval there was no longer any significant difference between the treatments. Perceived leg fatigue during exercise, evaluated 4 h after dosing, was more pronounced during treatment with atenolol than metoprolol CR 50 mg.The results suggest that the metoprolol CR formulation was not associated with significant effects on subjective well-being, whereas atenolol caused a deterioration at the time of the peak plasma concentration of the drug.     

Comparative beta-adrenoceptor blocking effects and pharmacokinetics of penbutolol and propranolol in man.

1 The beta-adrenoceptor blocking effects of penbutolol were compared with those of propranolol and a placebo in a double-blind trial involving six healthy volunteers. 2 Heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP) and peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) were measured at rest and during vigorous exercise before and at intervals up to 7 h after oral administration of the drugs. In addition, plasma renin activity (PRA) at rest and plasma levels of penbutolol and propranolol were determined. 3 Penbutolol proved to be a non-cardioselective beta-adrenoceptor blocking drug, antagonizing exercise-induced tachycardia, reducing exercise-induced increase in PEFR and decreasing PRA. The beta-adrenolytic potency of penbutolol was shown to be four-fold that of propranolol but the duration of its effect was similar. 4 The peak plasma level of penbutolol was reached 1 h after administration and its half-life was 4.5 h. 5 Comparison of plasma levels and biological activity of penbutolol revealed that after oral administration this drug is transformed into an active metabolite in man.     

Comparison of the duration of antihypertensive action of atenolol and metoprolol over a 24-hour period

The antihypertensive and beta-blocking effect of 100 mg atenolol and 100 mg metoprolol each given once daily were compared using an observer-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled crossover study. Blood pressure and heart rate were measured 22 hours after the last tablet of a 2-week dosing period. Twenty-five patients completed the study. Both drugs caused a significant decrease in supine and standing blood pressure, with atenolol effecting, numerically, the greater reductions. The decrease in standing diastolic blood pressure was significantly greater with atenolol than with metoprolol (p less than 0.05). Metoprolol at 22 hours post-dosing did not differ from placebo in the control of exercise systolic blood pressure (191.1 v 194.6 mmHg): the exercise systolic blood pressure achieved on atenolol (177.3 mmHg) was significantly lower than that achieved on both placebo (p less than 0.001) or metoprolol (p less than 0.05). The heart rates achieved on atenolol were significantly lower than those achieved on metoprolol in similar circumstances (p less than 0.001). It is concluded that, at the doses examined in this study, atenolol is the more suitable agent for the control of supine, standing and exercise blood pressure over 22 hours.     

Effects of long-acting propranolol on blood pressure and heart rate in hypertensive Chinese.

In a double-blind, balanced and randomised study we used treadmill exercise to assess the effects of long-acting propranolol (LA propranolol) 160 or 320 mg or placebo, given once daily for 4 weeks, on heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP) in 15 Chinese subjects with mild primary hypertension (PHT). We used 24 h ECG monitoring to assess drug effects on HR. Another 18 patients were similarly assessed without exercise. Steady-state plasma propranolol concentrations after LA propranolol 160 and 320 mg were comparable to those after ordinary propranolol 80 and 160 mg daily measured in 11 and 12 separate patients. LA propranolol 160 and 320 mg reduced HR and BP before and during vigorous exercise. LA propranolol 160 and 320 mg reduced HR for 17.6 and 21.4 h of the day, and 320 mg significantly reduced the mean 24 h HR, and the mean maximum HR. The drug effects on BP and HR, and the average plasma propranolol levels after LA propranolol were similar to those reported in European subjects.     

The effects of rilmenidine and atenolol on mental stress, dynamic exercise and autonomic function in mild to moderate hypertension.

1. The effects of 4 week treatment with rilmenidine or atenolol on tests of mental stress, dynamic exercise, autonomic function and psychometric tests were evaluated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study. 2. After a 4 week placebo run-in, 12 patients with essential hypertension (blood pressure [BP] 160/95 +/- 15/7 mmHg) received rilmenidine 1-2 mg day-1, and atenolol 50-100 mg day-1, each for 4 weeks, with a 4 week placebo wash-out between drug treatments. 3. Both agents produced a comparable reduction in supine and erect BP. During the mental arithmetic test, BP and heart rate (HR) responses were similar for rilmenidine and atenolol. 4. During bicycle exercise, the increase in HR was significantly greater after rilmenidine (+50 vs 41 beats min-1, P = 0.04). During recovery, the areas under the curve for diastolic BP (46,450 vs 51,400 mmHg s, P = 0.02) and HR (49,445 vs 63,597 beats min-1 s, P = 0.001) were significantly less with atenolol than rilmenidine. 5. Neither rilmenidine nor atenolol affected mental performance as judged by arithmetic and psychomotor tests. Physiological responses to autonomic function tests (deep breathing, facial immersion, isometric handgrip and cold pressor) were preserved with both drugs. The standing to lying ratio was higher on atenolol (P = 0.01) and Valsalva ratio was higher on rilmenidine (P = 0.03). 6. In conclusion, rilmenidine and atenolol exerted comparable antihypertensive effects both at rest and during mental and dynamic stress. Atenolol attenuated HR responses to dynamic exercise and the Valsalva manoeuvre; rilmenidine did not interfere with the physiological responses of BP and HR during autonomic function tests.     

Twenty-four-hour beta-blockade in stable angina pectoris: a study of atenolol and betaxolol.

We examined the importance of a long plasma half-life (t1/2) on the antianginal effects of beta-blockade by comparing equivalent doses of once-daily atenolol 100 mg (t1/2 6-8 h) and betaxolol 20 mg (t1/2 20-22 h) in a double-blind placebo-controlled cross-over study of 20 patients with stable angina pectoris. At 20 h postdose, heart rate (HR) was lower with betaxolol than with atenolol whereas blood pressure (BP) was equally reduced by both drugs. Twenty-four-hour ambulatory HR recording demonstrated that this difference existed for the last 6 h of the dosage cycle. During treadmill exercise, HR remained lower with betaxolol than with atenolol and exercise time was significantly prolonged only by betaxolol. With placebo, radionuclide ventriculography demonstrated that left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) decreased during exercise. Betaxolol, but not atenolol, significantly attenuated the exercise-induced decrease in EF. Thus, the long plasma t1/2 of betaxolol is associated with a reduction in exercise-induced ischemia when tested toward the end of the 24-h dosage cycle. Plasma t1/2 therefore is of clinical relevance to the antianginal, but not antihypertensive, actions of beta-blockers.     

Effect of penbutolol (Hoe 893 d) and practolol on exercise-induced angina pectoris 2 and 24 hours after a single oral dose

Summary The effect of penbutolol (Hoe 893 d), a new non-cardioselective beta-blocking agent presumed to have a prolonged action, was compared with practolol and placebo by exercise tests in 12 male patients with stable angina pectoris. The patients received oral penbutolol 20 mg, practolol 200 mg or placebo in a randomized, double blind, cross-over trial. The preparations used were in identical-appearing capsules — of penbutolol 10 mg, practolol 100 mg and placebo. Exercise tests were performed after 2 and 24 h. In the tests performed after 2 h, both beta-blockers increased the total work performed and the duration of work significantly more than placebo (p<0.05). Penbutolol increased the exercise period before appearance of angina pectoris from 4.6 to 7.1 min (p<0.05). The difference between practolol and placebo was not significant. The rate pressure product was significantly reduced after penbutolol compared to placebo (p<0.05). At the amount of work that forced patients on placebo to stop, the ST-depression in the ECG was significantly reduced after beta-blocker (p<0.05). However, at maximum work load no significant difference between the beta-blockers and placebo was found. After 24 h virtually no clinical effects were observed after either penbutolol or practolol. One patient on practolol complained of Raynaud's syndrome. No side effects were noted after penbutolol.     

Exercise metabolism in healthy volunteers taking atenolol, high and low doses of metoprolol CR/Z0K, and placebo.

1. Exercise and beta-adrenoceptor blockade have important roles in the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease, but fatigue and a reduced capacity to exercise are commonly reported side effects of beta-adrenoceptor blockers. The reduced capacity to exercise may be partly caused by a reduction in fat metabolism. 2. We investigated the effects of atenolol 50 mg, metoprolol CR/Z0K 50 mg, metoprolol CR/Z0K 100 mg and placebo, on heart rate, energy expenditure, fat oxidation, plasma free fatty acids, glycerol, glucose, lactate, ammonia and perceived exertion during 2 h of treadmill walking at 40% of maximal oxygen uptake in 20 healthy volunteers. 3. Compared with placebo (38.0%), total fat oxidation was significantly lower on atenolol 50 mg (30.1%) and metoprolol CR/Z0K 100 mg (31.0%), but not on metoprolol CR/Z0K 50 mg (33.7%). Reductions in fat oxidation correlated well (r2 = 0.970) with reductions in exercising heart rate, and probably reflected the degree of beta 1-adrenoceptor blockade. Maximum plasma ammonia concentration was reached after 45 min of exercise on atenolol, 60 min on metoprolol CR/Z0K 100, and 75 min on metoprolol CR/Z0K 50, and was higher than placebo on all active drug treatments. 4. The greater reduction in fat oxidation with atenolol may be a reflection of a peak in plasma concentration, which is avoided with a controlled release preparation.     

Clinical studies with the potassium channel activator cromakalim in normotensive and hypertensive subjects.

Eight normotensive subjects received single and multiple doses of cromakalim (1 mg) and placebo in a randomised double-blind cross-over study to examine general tolerance to cromakalim and its effects on blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), and pressor responses to norepinephrine (NE) and angiotensin II (AII). In a second study, 10 hypertensive patients whose BP control was unsatisfactory with atenolol 50-100 mg received additional treatment with placebo followed by cromakalim 1 mg daily for 4 weeks. Assessments were made of BP, HR, apparent hepatic blood flow and renal blood flow (RBF), pulmonary function, and the pharmacokinetics of atenolol. Cromakalim was generally well tolerated in both normotensive and hypertensive subjects. In the normotensive group, cromakalim produced a reflex increase in HR without any detectable decrease in BP: average (placebo-subtracted) increases in HR at 4 h were 16 beats/min with subjects in an erect position after the single dose and 14 beats/min after 7 days. Cromakalim had no effect on pressor responses to NE and AII. Addition of cromakalim to atenolol was associated with modest further reductions in BP between 0.5 and 3 h after drug administration, with maximal reductions of 21/14 mm Hg (subjects in supine position) 2 h after the first dose. Cromakalim had no effect on apparent liver blood flow and RBF, pulmonary function, and the steady-state pharmacokinetics of atenolol. Single and multiple 1-mg doses of cromakalim are well tolerated but are associated with only modest vasodilator activity.     

Influence of metoprolol and cilazapril on blood pressure and on sleep apnea activity.

Up to 50% of hypertensive men are subject to sleep apnea (SA). With a prevalence in men of up to 10%, SA is a common illness and hypertension (HT) one of its early symptoms. It is important to have available a drug treatment that will effectively control blood pressure (BP) without exacerbating symptoms of SA. Twelve patients with SA and HT were investigated in a double-blind, comparative trial. Patients were randomly allocated to either metoprolol (M) 100 mg daily or cilazapril (C) 2.5 mg daily. Polysomnographic measurements under standardized conditions including intraarterial BP monitoring were taken on two consecutive nights each before and after the 1-week treatment. Values in the M group were (mean +/- 95% CI) systolic BP 161 +/- 2.1 vs. 148 +/- 2.2 mm Hg (p less than 0.01); diastolic BP 98 +/- 1.8 vs. 93 +/- 1.8 mm Hg (p less than 0.01); and HR 73 +/- 1.2 vs 65 +/- 1.1 beats/min (p less than 0.01). Corresponding figures for the C group were systolic BP 140 +/- 2.1 vs. 127 +/- 2.1 mm Hg (p less than 0.01); diastolic BP 95 +/- 1.7 vs. 78 +/- 1.7 mm Hg (p less than 0.01); and HR 82 +/- 1.1 vs. 79 +/- 1.2 beats/min (p less than 0.01). Whereas C reduced both BP and HR in all sleep phases, M produced no changes during REM sleep. SA activity was 45 (range 15-91) vs. 34 (range 2-57) apneas per hour of sleep in the M group and 54 (range 21-84) vs. 40 (range 8-72) apneas per hour in the C group (p less than 0.01). There were no changes in total sleep time or in the proportions of non-REM to REM sleep. Both M and C reduce nocturnal BP in SA patients, but the effect of C is seen in all sleep phases. C has a more favorable effect on the disturbed nocturnal blood pressure of SA patients.     

A placebo controlled comparison of the effects of metoprolol and celiprolol on echo-Doppler measurements of cardiovascular function in normal volunteers.

1. This study used a continuous-wave echo-Doppler method (Exerdrop) to investigate the effects of beta-adrenoceptor antagonism and partial agonism on cardiovascular responses at rest and during dynamic exercise. 2. A double-blind, randomised, placebo controlled comparison of metoprolol (50 mg) and celiprolol (200 mg) was undertaken in nine normal volunteers; single oral doses of medication were administered at weekly intervals. Rest and exercise (supine bicycle) haemodynamics were assessed at 0, 2, 4, 6 and 8 h following dosing. 3. Before dosing and after placebo, the aortic flow velocity, acceleration and velocity integral increased progressively during exercise, as did heart rate, blood pressure and cardiac output. 4. Following metoprolol 50 mg, heart rate was significantly reduced without change in systolic or diastolic blood pressure. Echo-Doppler peak acceleration and velocity decreased at rest. On exercise, heart rate and systolic blood pressure fell significantly; the increase in acceleration was significantly blunted compared with placebo (a decrease of 15.2% at rest and 22.9% at 75 watts; P < 0.01 vs placebo). Peak velocity fell significantly by 75 watts exercise. 5. Celiprolol 200 mg at rest significantly increased systolic blood pressure, peak acceleration and velocity. On exercise celiprolol, in contrast to metoprolol, did not reduce peak acceleration or peak velocity; however exercise heart rate and systolic blood pressure were significantly reduced. The difference between celiprolol and metoprolol in respect of peak acceleration persisted over the 8 h of the study. 6. These differences between metoprolol and celiprolol are compatible with the partial agonism of celiprolol.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Twenty-four hour effects of oxprenolol oros and atenolol on heart rate,blood pressure,exercise tolerance and perceived exertion

Summary The effects of oxprenolol, a non-selective beta-blocker with moderate intrinsic sympathomimetic activity (ISA), given by the Oros delivery system, on resting and exercise heart rate and blood pressure have been compared over a 24-h period with those of atenolol, a beta₁-selective blocker without ISA. The effects on maximal and submaximal exercise tolerance and perceived exertion were studied in relation to the level of beta-blockade. 9 healthy subjects were treated with placebo, atenolol, 100 mg/day and oxprenolol Oros, 16/260 mg/day in random order, each for 5 days. Progressive maximal exercise tests and submaximal endurance tests at 80% of maximum aerobic exercise capacity were performed 2, 5 and 24 h after intake of the drugs.The reduction of blood pressure 2 and 5 h after drug intake was less pronounced after oxprenolol Oros than after atenolol, but by 24 h after the last dose the effects were similar. The peak level of beta-blockade (i.e. reduction in maximal exercise heart rate) was similar after oxprenolol Oros and atenolol. The minimal level of beta-blockade 24 h after the last dose was greater after oxprenolol Oros than after atenolol. Maximal exercise capacity and submaximal exercise tolerance were impaired after both beta-blockers. The subjective feeling of exertion did not differ between placebo, atenolol and oxprenolol Oros when related to the relative work load, except after the first minute of exercise, when the rating of perceived exertion was higher after atenolol.     

Influence of debrisoquine oxidation phenotype on exercise tolerance and subjective fatigue after metoprolol and atenolol in healthy subjects.

1. The effects of single doses of metoprolol 50 mg, metoprolol 100 mg and atenolol 100 mg on exercise tolerance were compared with placebo in a double-blind random cross-over study in 12 healthy subjects. Nine subjects were extensive metabolisers of debrisoquine, and three were poor metabolisers. 2. Three hours after dosing beta-adrenoceptor blocker treatments significantly reduced exercise heart rate, prolonged time to complete exercise, and increased subjective fatigue measured by visual analogue scale. 3. Scores for subjective fatigue did not correlate with reduction in exercise heart rate or prolongation of exercise time. Exercise time prolongation was weakly but not significantly correlated with exercise heart rate reduction. 4. When compared with placebo, prolongation of exercise time and increased fatigue with metoprolol were not significantly related to debrisoquine oxidation phenotype or to the debrisoquine/4-hydroxydebrisoquine (D/4OH-D) ratio. 5. When metoprolol responses were compared with those for atenolol, changes in exercise time and fatigue scores were significantly related to oxidation phenotype. For metoprolol 100 mg, poor metabolisers required 20.8 s longer to complete exercise (P less than 0.05) and had higher fatigue scores by 78% (P less than 0.05) as compared with extensive metabolisers.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Comparison of two slow-release formulations of metoprolol with conventional metoprolol and atenolol in hypertensive patients

We have compared the beta-adrenoceptor blocking and antihypertensive effects of chronic once daily treatment with conventional metoprolol 200 mg, two 'long-acting' formulations of metoprolol 200 mg and atenolol 100 mg in a cross-over study in 12 hypertensive patients concurrently receiving diuretic therapy. The peak effects of all compounds were similar, with significant reductions in exercise heart rate and blood pressure. Twenty-four hours after dosing only atenolol treatment was consistently associated with a reduction in both exercise heart rate (P less than 0.001) and blood pressure (P less than 0.02) when compared with placebo. Once daily treatment of hypertension with metoprolol, even in 'long-acting' formulations, cannot be recommended because of waning antihypertensive effect which would be missed at routine clinic attendance. Metoprolol should be prescribed twice daily in hypertension. So-called long-acting formulations do not always confer benefits over conventional dose forms.