Efficacy of salmeterol xinafoate in the treatment of COPD

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To examine and compare the efficacy and safety of salmeterol xinafoate, a long-acting inhaled beta2-adrenergic agonist, with inhaled ipratropium bromide and inhaled placebo in patients with COPD. DESIGN: A stratified, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, parallel group clinical trial. SETTING: Multiple sites at clinics and university medical centers throughout the United States. PATIENTS: Four hundred eleven symptomatic patients with COPD with FEV1 < or = 65% predicted and no clinically significant concurrent disease. Interventions: Comparison of inhaled salmeterol (42 microg twice daily), inhaled ipratropium bromide (36 microg four times a day), and inhaled placebo (2 puffs four times a day) over 12 weeks. RESULTS: Salmeterol xinafoate was significantly (p < 0.0001) better than placebo and ipratropium in improving lung function at the recommended doses over the 12-week trial. Both salmeterol and ipratropium reduced dyspnea related to activities of daily living compared with placebo; this improvement was associated with reduced use of supplemental albuterol. Analyses of time to first COPD exacerbation revealed salmeterol to be superior to placebo and ipratropium (p < 0.05). Adverse effects were similar among the three treatments. CONCLUSIONS: These collective data support the use of salmeterol as first-line bronchodilator therapy for the long-term treatment of airflow obstruction in patients with COPD.     

Use of a long-acting inhaled beta2-adrenergic agonist, salmeterol xinafoate, in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a condition in which continuous bronchodilation may have clinical advantages. This study evaluated salmeterol, a beta-agonist bronchodilator with a duration of action substantially longer than that of short-acting beta-agonists, compared with ipratropium, an anticholinergic bronchodilator, and placebo in patients with COPD. Four hundred and five patients with COPD received either salmeterol 42 microg twice daily, ipratropium bromide 36 microg four times daily, or placebo for 12 wk in this randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study. Patients were stratified on the basis of bronchodilator response to albuterol (> 12% and > 200-ml improvement) and were randomized within each stratum. Bronchodilator response was measured over 12 h four times during the treatment period. Salmeterol provided similar maximal bronchodilatation to ipratropium but had a longer duration of action and a more constant bronchodilatory effect with no evidence of bronchodilator tolerance. Both active treatments were well tolerated. Salmeterol was an effective bronchodilator with a consistent effect over this 12-wk study in patients with COPD, including those "unresponsive" to albuterol. The long duration of action of salmeterol offers the advantage of twice daily dosing compared with the required four times a day dosing with ipratropium.     

Long-term treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with salmeterol and the additive effect of ipratropium.

The efficacy and safety of salmeterol alone was compared with the combination of salmeterol plus ipratropium and with placebo during long-term treatment in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. In addition, the single-dose effect in response to the first dose of treatment was studied over 12 h. The patients (n=144; age 64+/-7 yrs, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) 44+/-11% pred) participated in a three-centre double-blind double-placebo parallel group study and were randomized after a run-in period of 2 weeks to receive either salmeterol 50 microg b.i.d., salmeterol 5 microg b.i.d. plus ipratropium 40 microg q.i.d. or placebo for a period of 12 weeks. The single-dose study demonstrated that salmeterol produced a significant increase in FEV1 (peak of 7% pred) and specific airway conductance (sGaw) (maximum of 60% baseline) for > or =12 h. The combination of salmeterol plus ipratropium elicited a greater bronchodilator response (11% and 94% increases respectively) than salmeterol alone during the first 6 h after inhalation. During treatment there were significant improvements in daytime symptom scores and morning peak expiratory flow in both the salmeterol and the salmeterol plus ipratropium groups (p<0.001), with an associated decrease in the use of rescue salbutamol. Improvements in FEV1 and sGaw were greater in the salmeterol plus ipratropium group than in the patients receiving only salmeterol. Thirty-five patients had an exacerbation; 11 (23%) in the salmeterol group (versus placebo NS), six (13%) in the salmeterol plus ipratropium group (versus placebo p<0.01) and 18 (36%) in the placebo group. In conclusion, in patients with severe stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, long-term treatment with either salmeterol alone or salmeterol plus ipratropium is safe and effective. There was added benefit from the combination therapy in terms of improvement in airways obstruction, but not for improvement in symptom control or need for rescue salbutamol.     

A 6-month,placebo-controlled study comparing lung function and health status changes in COPD patients treated with tiotropium or salmeterol

BACKGROUND: Tiotropium, a once-daily anticholinergic, and salmeterol represent two inhaled, long-acting bronchodilators from different pharmacologic classes. A trial was designed to examine the efficacy and safety of both compounds with multiple outcome measures, including lung function, dyspnea, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with COPD. METHODS: A 6-month, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group study of tiotropium, 18 microg once daily via dry-powder inhaler, compared with salmeterol, 50 microg bid via metered-dose inhaler, was conducted in patients with COPD. Efficacy was assessed by 12-h monitoring of spirometry, transition dyspnea index (TDI), and the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ). RESULTS: A total of 623 patients participated (tiotropium, n= 209; salmeterol, n = 213; and placebo, n = 201). The groups were similar in age (mean, 65 years), gender (75% men), and baseline FEV(1) (mean, 1.08 +/- 0.37 L; percent predicted, 40 +/- 12% [+/- SD]). Compared with placebo treatment, the mean predose morning FEV(1) following 6 months of therapy increased significantly more for the tiotropium group (0.14 L) than the salmeterol group (0.09 L; p < 0.01). The average FEV(1) (0 to 12 h) for tiotropium was statistically superior to salmeterol (difference, 0.08 L; p < 0.001). Tiotropium improved TDI focal score by 1.02 U compared with placebo (p = 0.01), whereas there was no significant change in TDI focal score with salmeterol (0.24 U). Tiotropium was superior to salmeterol in improving TDI focal score (p < 0.05). At 6 months, the mean improvement in SGRQ total score vs baseline was tiotropium, - 5.14 U (p < 0.05 vs placebo); salmeterol, - 3.54 U (p = 0.4 vs placebo); and placebo, - 2.43 U. A statistically higher proportion of patients receiving tiotropium achieved at least a 4-U change in SGRQ score compared to patients receiving placebo. Both active drugs reduced the need for rescue albuterol (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Tiotropium once daily produces superior bronchodilation, improvements in dyspnea, and proportion of patients achieving meaningful changes in HRQoL compared to twice-daily salmeterol in patients with COPD.     

Effectiveness and safety of salmeterol in nonspecialist practice settings

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of inhaled salmeterol in patients managed in nonspecialist practice settings. DESIGN: A randomized, double-blind, 6-month, parallel-group study involving 253 centers. SETTING: Primarily nonspecialist practices (n = 232). PATIENTS: A total of 911 subjects (417 men; 494 women) who met American Thoracic Society asthma criteria were enrolled and randomized to treatment with either twice-daily salmeterol aerosol (50 microg; n = 455) or matching placebo twice daily (n = 456). Both groups were allowed to take salbutamol as needed. All subjects were previously treated with anti-inflammatory maintenance therapy that was continued throughout the study. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: The primary outcome variable was the proportion of subjects with serious asthma exacerbations defined as an exacerbation requiring hospitalization, emergency department visit, or use of prednisone during the treatment period. A total of 712 subjects competed the study. There was no significant difference in the proportion of subjects experiencing serious exacerbations between the salmeterol and placebo groups (20.8% vs 20.9%, respectively; p = 0.935; power > 88%). Peak expiratory flow was significantly higher in the salmeterol group (398 L/min vs 386 L/min for placebo; p < 0.01). Median daily use of salbutamol was two inhalations for the salmeterol group and three inhalations for placebo (p < 0.001). The proportion of subjects sleeping through the night was significantly higher in the salmeterol group (74%) as compared to placebo (68%; p = 0.028). CONCLUSIONS: Salmeterol treatment is effective in subjects typically cared for in the primary-care setting and does not increase the frequency of severe exacerbations.     

Formoterol: a review of its use in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Inhaled formoterol is a long-acting selective beta2-adrenoceptor agonist, with an onset of action of 5 minutes postdose and a bronchodilator effect that lasts for at least 12 hours. Statistically significant and clinically relevant (>120 ml) improvements in lung function [assessed using standardized/normalized area under the forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) versus time curve (AUC FEV1)] were observed with inhaled formoterol 12 microg twice daily (the approved dosage in the US) compared with placebo in 12-week and 12-month, randomized, double-blind trials in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The bronchodilator efficacy of formoterol 12 microg twice daily was greater than that of oral slow-release theophylline (individualized dosages) in a 12-month trial or inhaled ipratropium bromide 40 microg four times daily in a 12-week trial. Improvement in AUC FEV1 with formoterol, but not theophylline, compared with placebo was observed in patients with irreversible or poorly-reversible airflow obstruction. Formoterol also significantly improved health-related quality of life compared with ipratropium bromide or placebo and significantly reduced symptoms compared with placebo. Combination therapy with formoterol 12 microg twice daily plus ipratropium bromide 40 microg four times daily was significantly more effective than albuterol (salbutamol) 200 microg four times daily plus the same dosage of ipratropium bromide in a 3-week, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, crossover trial. Inhaled formoterol was well tolerated in clinical trials. The incidence of investigator-determined drug-related adverse events with inhaled formoterol 12 microg twice daily was similar to that with placebo and inhaled ipratropium bromide 40 microg four times daily but lower than that with oral slow-release theophylline (individualized dosages). Importantly, there were no significant differences between formoterol and placebo or comparator drugs in cardiovascular adverse events in patients with COPD and corrected QT interval values within the normal range. In conclusion, inhaled formoterol improved lung function and health-related quality of life and reduced symptoms relative to placebo in clinical trials in patients with COPD. The drug had greater bronchodilator efficacy than oral slow-release theophylline or inhaled ipratropium bromide and showed efficacy in combination with ipratropium bromide. The adverse events profile (including cardiovascular adverse events) with formoterol was similar to that with placebo. Thus, inhaled formoterol may be considered as a first-line option for the management of bronchoconstriction in patients with COPD who require regular bronchodilator therapy for the management of symptoms.     

The contribution of the swallowed fraction of an inhaled dose of salmeterol to it systemic effects.

Salmeterol is approximately eight times as potent as salbutamol for systemic effects. This may be because the drug is eight times more potent on receptors or there may be differences in systemic bioavailability. The systemic effects of salbutamol are limited by its fairly high first-pass metabolism, but the oral bioavailability of salmeterol is unknown. The contribution of the swallowed fraction of an inhaled dose of salmeterol to its systemic effects were analysed in a randomized, double-blind, crossover study. Twelve healthy subjects were given inhaled salmeterol 400 microg, inhaled salmeterol 400 microg plus oral activated charcoal or inhaled placebo plus oral activated charcoal on three separate days. Cardiac frequency (fC), Q-T interval corrected for heart rate (QTc), plasma potassium and glucose concentrations were measured for 4 h following the inhaled drug. Salmeterol with and without oral charcoal produced significant changes for all measures compared to placebo. The magnitude of effect following salmeterol alone was significantly greater than that following salmeterol plus charcoal for fC and glucose (mean (95% confidence interval) differences 8 (2-13) beats x min(-1), 0.59 (0.04, 1.13) mmol x L(-1), respectively) and nonsignificantly greater for QTc interval and potassium concentration. The differences between salmeterol given with and without charcoal suggest that 28-36% of the systemic response to salmeterol administered from a metered-dose inhaler are due to drug absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract. Thus, most of the systemic effects are due to the inhaled fraction of the drug.     

A comparison between inhaled salmeterol and theophylline in the short-term treatment of stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

BACKGROUND: International guidelines indicate that the long-acting bronchodilators play a key role in the treatment of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The aim of this study was to assess the short term efficacy and safety of 50 and 100 microg bid inhaled salmeterol, compared with placebo and orally dose titrated slow-release theophylline in patients with stable COPD. METHODS: Thirteen patients (67+/-7 years, three females) with moderate-to-severe COPD (FEV1<70% predicted and >30% predicted) and with poor reversibility (post-bronchodilator FEV1<12% and <200 ml from pre-bronchodilator values) completed this single centre randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, four-phase cross-over clinical trial. Patients were randomised to treatment after a 2-week oral corticosteroid trial and a theophylline titration phase. Each treatment lasted 2 week with a 2-week washout period. Values at the end of treatments were compared. RESULTS: Inhaled salmeterol at both tested doses was better than placebo in improving lung function (FEV1, FVC, and morning PEF) of stable patients with moderate COPD over a period of 2 weeks. Although slight (about 170 ml, 150 ml, and 120 ml/min on average, for FEV1, FVC, and PEF, respectively) the improvement was significant. The effects seem to improve only slightly with the higher dose. Salmeterol appeared to be more effective than theophylline treatment when compared to placebo, as theophylline improved significantly, but less, the FEV1 (about 80 ml, on average) without affecting any of the other lung function variables. Salmeterol 100 microg was significantly better than theophylline in improving morning PEF. Four patients reported five adverse events while receiving placebo and 2 and 3 patients reported 2 and 3 adverse events, respectively, during salmeterol 50 microg and salmeterol 100 microg phases. None was considered drug related. Five patients experienced 13 adverse events with theophylline treatment, four of which were considered drug related. CONCLUSION: Inhaled salmeterol improves lung function in stable patients with moderate-to-severe and poorly reversible COPD. The magnitude of improvement in FEV1 observed in this study is similar to that found in longer and larger studies on similar populations of patients. In those studies, that improvement was associated with a better quality of life and less symptoms. Theophylline determined a smaller improvement in FEV1 with more unpleasant side effects that both doses of inhaled salmeterol, though there was no significant difference. It is concluded that salmeterol is an effective and well tolerated therapy, potentially preferable to theophylline, at least in the short-term management of stable COPD.     

Inhaled salmeterol/fluticasone propionate combination in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Salmeterol/fluticasone propionate is a fixed-dose combination of the long-acting beta2-adrenoceptor agonist salmeterol and the corticosteroid fluticasone propionate and is inhaled via the Diskus powder inhaler. In three randomized, double-blind, 24-week or 52-week studies in >2850 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), administration of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate 50/250 microg twice daily (in one study) and salmeterol/fluticasone propionate 50/500 microg twice daily (in the other studies) provided greater improvement in lung function than placebo or either component alone at the same nominal dosage. Both strengths of the combination product administered twice daily resulted in clinically meaningful increases in scores in health-related quality-of-life questionnaires that were specific for respiratory disease. Improvements in this and almost all other secondary measures of efficacy, including symptomatic outcomes, were significantly greater with the combination product than with placebo. Administration of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate as a combination product did not result in any untoward interactions that affected the pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic or tolerability profiles of the individual components. Candidiasis, hoarseness/dysphonia, throat irritation and headache occurred more frequently with salmeterol/fluticasone propionate than with placebo in patients with COPD.     

Effect of single inhalation of a salbutamol,ipratropium bromide and beclomethasone on mucociliary clearance in patients with chronic obstructive airway disease

BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive airway disease (COAD) is associated with hyperplasia and hypertrophy of the mucus producing glands. The beneficial effect of inhaled drug may be due to improved mucociliary function. The present study was done to evaluate the effect of salbutamol, ipratropium bromide and beclomethasone dipropionate inhalation on mucociliary clearance in patients with COAD. METHODS: Ten patients of COAD were taken up, two patients however did not complete the study. Salbutamol, ipratropium bromide, beclomethasone dipropionate and placebo inhalation were given randomly to each patient on four separate days. Radioaerosol inhalation lung cine-scintigraphy after inhalation of the different drugs was followed up to two hours and than after 24 hours. RESULTS: There was no significant visually noticeable increased mucociliary clearance on any of the days. Two patients showed definite steep slope in the time activity curves with salbutamol as compared to other drugs or placebo. All the quantitative indices analysed at the end of one hour and two hours for the three drugs were comparable to placebo. CONCLUSIONS: A single dose of inhaled salbutamol, ipratropium bromide and beclomethasone dipropionate has no appreciable effect on mucociliary clearance in patients with COAD.     

The role of domiciliary nebulizers in managing patients with severe COPD

The difficulty of assessing nebulizer responses in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has been demonstrated before. This study aims to re-examine both the role of domiciliary nebulizers in COPD and also bronchodilator (BD) assessment in individuals. In a double-blind, randomized, cross-over trial, 19 stable patients with severe COPD were given the following medication 6-hourly for 2-week periods: (1) nebulized salbutamol 2.5 mg with ipratropium 0.5 mg and placebo inhalers (MDI) with spacer; (2) placebo nebules and inhaled salbutamol 400 microg with ipratropium 80 microg via MDI with spacer; (3) inhaled salbutamol 400 microg with ipratropium 80 microg via MDI with spacer (but no placebo nebulized drugs). Both nebulized and MDI drugs produced highly significant improvements in forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), specific airways conductance, 6-min walking distance (6MWD) and residual volume. There were no significant differences between BD responses obtained after active nebulized and active MDI BDs. From the diary cards, 2 weeks of active nebulized BDs produced a slightly higher median peak expiratory flow (PEF) than active MDI BDs (236 and 219 l m(-1), respectively, P=0.01) and slightly less extra inhaler use (0.8 and 1.1 puffs, respectively, P<0.05) but no significant difference in dyspnoea or quality of life (QOL) scores. There were significant correlations between domiciliary PEF and acute BD-induced changes in FVC and 6MWD, and also between domiciliary dyspnoea scores and acute changes in both total lung capacity and 6MWD. In conclusion, nebulized medication conferred little clinical advantage over the regular use of inhalers with spacers in this group of patients with severe COPD. However, acute changes in total lung capacity, FVC and 6MWD may be useful predictors of the longer-term effects of nebulized BDs in individual patients.     

A Short-Term Comparison of Fluticasone Propionate/Salmeterol with Ipratropium Bromide/Albuterol for the Treatment of COPD

Background: This is the first comparison of two combination therapies, fluticasone propionate/salmeterol and ipratropium bromide/albuterol (salbutamol), for the treatment of patients with COPD. Methods: A randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel group, multicenter evaluation of fluticasone propionate/salmeterol 250/50µg twice daily via DISKUS® and ipratropium bromide/albuterol 36/206µg four times daily via metered-dose inhaler over 8 weeks was conducted at 41 research sites in the US. Morning pre-dose FEV₁, 6-hour serial spirometry, PEF, dyspnea, night-time awakenings, supplemental albuterol use, and patient diary evaluations of symptoms were evaluated. Results: A total of 365 patients with symptomatic COPD were enrolled. The treatment groups were similar in mean age (63.3 and 63.9 years), screening pulmonary function (44.1% and 43.2% of predicted FEV₁), race (96% and 95% White), and sex distribution (59% and 60% male). Both fluticasone propionate/salmeterol and ipratropium bromide/albuterol improved lung function, symptoms, and supplemental albuterol use compared with baseline. Fluticasone propionate/salmeterol was more effective than ipratropium bromide/albuterol for improvement in morning pre-dose FEV₁, morning PEF, 6-hour FEV₁ area under the curve (AUC₆), Transition Dyspnea Index® (TDI) focal score, daytime symptom score, night-time awakenings, sleep symptoms, and albuterol-free nights (p ≤ 0.013). Compared with day 1, at week 8 the FEV₁ AUC₆ significantly increased with fluticasone propionate/salmeterol and significantly decreased with ipratropium bromide/albuterol (p ≤ 0.003). The incidence of adverse events was similar between treatment groups, except for a higher incidence of oral candidiasis with fluticasone propionate/salmeterol. Conclusions: Short-term treatment with the combined inhaled corticosteroid and long-acting β₂-adrenoceptor agonist fluticasone propionate/salmeterol resulted in greater control of lung function and symptoms than combined ipratropium bromide/albuterol bronchodilator therapy, in patients with COPD.     

Comparison of the bronchodilating effect of salmeterol and zafirlukast in combination with that of their use as single treatments in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that the effect of a beta2-agonist is additive with that of a cysteinyl leukotriene 1 receptor antagonist. OBJECTIVES: The present study was designed to answer the question of whether combined administration of inhaled salmeterol and oral zafirlukast at the standard doses would result in greater bronchodilation in patients with chronic airway obstruction than the use of either drug alone. METHODS: The study was performed using a double-blind, double-dummy, crossover, randomised design, and was conducted on 4 non-consecutive days. Sixteen patients with moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and 10 non-smoker asthmatic patients received 40 mg of oral zafirlukast, 50 microg of inhaled salmeterol, 50 microg of inhaled salmeterol plus 40 mg of oral zafirlukast of placebo. Lung function was assessed before drug administration and 30, 60, 120, 180 and 240 min thereafter. At the end of the 4-hour period, each patient received 400 microg of inhaled salbutamol and spirometric testing was performed 30 min later. RESULTS: In both asthmatic and COPD patients, the overall effect of salmeterol and zafirlukast on the forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) was considered extremely significant (p < 0.0001), with a maximum bronchodilation above baseline after 180 min (20.7 and 11.0%, respectively) in asthmatics and after 2 h (21.7 and 11.2%, respectively) in COPD subjects. Zafirlukast did not produce any further significant acute bronchodilation in addition to that achieved with salmeterol alone in either asthmatic or COPD patients. Nevertheless, 7 out of 16 COPD patients and 7 out of 10 asthmatic patients had a further improvement after the combination of salmeterol and zafirlukast. The mean difference in pre- and post-salbutamol FEV1 values in both asthmatic and COPD patients after zafirlukast was significant (p < 0.05), but that after salmeterol and the combination of the two drugs was not significant (p > 0.05). The difference between placebo and zafirlukast was not significant following inhaled salbutamol given 4 h after each treatment. Conclusions: Both salmeterol and zafirlukast induced a significant increase in FEV1, although salmeterol elicited a greater improvement in both asthmatic and COPD patients. Apparently, zafirlukast at the clinically recommended dose did not produce any further significant acute bronchodilation in addition to that achieved with salmeterol alone, either in asthma or COPD. In any case, evaluation of the effect of the combination over a 12-hour period is mandatory.     

In patients with COPD, treatment with a combination of formoterol and ipratropium is more effective than a combination of salbutamol and ipratropium : a 3-week, randomized, double-blind, within-patient, multicenter study

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy of adding formoterol or salbutamol to regular ipratropium bromide treatment in COPD patients whose conditions were suboptimally controlled with ipratropium bromide alone. DESIGN: A randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, two-period, crossover clinical trial. SETTING: Twenty-four clinics and university medical centers in nine countries. PATIENTS: One hundred seventy-two patients with baseline FEV(1) < or = 65% predicted, with FEV(1) reversibility to salbutamol not exceeding the normal variability of the measurement, and symptomatic despite regular treatment with ipratropium bromide. INTERVENTIONS: Each patient received two treatments in random order: either inhaled formoterol dry powder, 12 microg bid, in addition to ipratropium bromide, 40 microg qid for 3 weeks, followed by salbutamol, 200 microg qid, in addition to ipratropium, 40 microg qid for 3 weeks, or vice versa. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Efficacy end points included morning premedication peak expiratory flow (PEF) during the last week of treatment (primary end point), the area under the curve (AUC) for FEV(1) measured for 6 h after morning dose on the last day of treatment, and symptom scores (from daily diary recordings). Morning PEF and the AUC for FEV(1) were significantly better for formoterol/ipratropium than for salbutamol/ipratropium (p = 0.0003 and p < 0.0001, respectively). The formoterol/ipratropium combination also induced a greater improvement in mean total symptom scores (p = 0.0042). The safety profile of the two treatments was comparable. CONCLUSIONS: In COPD patients requiring combination bronchodilator treatment, the addition of formoterol to regular ipratropium treatment is more effective than the addition of salbutamol.     

Does a single dose of the phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor,cilomilast (15 mg), induce bronchodilation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease?

Maintenance treatment with PDE(4) inhibitor cilomilast improves FEV(1) in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. We investigated the acute bronchodilating effects of a single dose of cilomilast with or without concomitant administration of inhaled salbutamol and/or ipratropium bromide in 21 patients with COPD (mean (SD) age 64 (8.1) y, post-salbutamol FEV(1) 47.7 (13.2) %predicted). FEV(1) was measured before and up to 8 hourly intervals after intake of placebo, cilomilast, or cilomilast in combination with inhaled salbutamol 400 microg and/or ipratropium bromide 80 microg. Maximum increase in FEV(1) from pre-dose baseline was calculated after each treatment and differences between treatment arms were analyzed by ANOVA. The mean (SEM) maximum increase in FEV(1) was 139.6 (18.5) ml following cilomilast and 151.5 (18.5) ml following placebo (95% C.I. for mean difference between cilomilast and placebo: -67.3, 43.6 ml). Furthermore, combined treatment of cilomilast with salbutamol or ipratropium resulted in a maximum increase in FEV(1) of 280.7 (25.6) and 297.0 (25.9) ml, respectively, while this was 379.0 (24.6) ml following cilomilast with both salbutamol and ipratropium (p < 0.01). We conclude that a single dose of cilomilast does not produce acute bronchodilation in patients with COPD who otherwise respond to inhaled bronchodilators. Our results implicate that the change in lung function seen after long-term treatment with cilomilast is not the result of acute bronchodilation in patients with COPD.     

Effectiveness of salmeterol versus ipratropium bromide on exertional dyspnoea in COPD.

The hypothesis of the study was that salmeterol and ipratropium would have similar dyspnoea ratings during steady-state cycle ergometry at 1 h, but that salmeterol would reduce dyspnoea at 6 h after administration in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The study design was a randomized, double-blind trial in 16 patients (aged 63 +/- 11 yrs) with symptomatic COPD. Two days after familiarization with testing procedures, patients were randomly assigned to receive either two puffs (42 microg) of salmeterol and two puffs of placebo inhaler, or two puffs (36 microg) of ipratropium from each of two inhalers (total, 72 microg). Two days later, patients received the alternative medication. During exercise at 60% of peak oxygen consumption patients rated dyspnoea and performed inspiratory capacity manoeuvres each minute. Forced expiratory volume in one second was 1.13+/-0.48 L (37+/-13% predicted). Dyspnoea ratings were similar for salmeterol and ipratropium at 1 and 6 h. Inspiratory capacity was similar for salmeterol and ipratropium at 1 h, but significantly higher for salmeterol at 6 h (delta = 120 mL; p = 0.03). It is concluded that with the doses used, salmeterol and ipratropium provided similar dyspnoea ratings during exercise at 1 and 6 h after administration.     

Salmeterol reduces the need for inhaled corticosteroid in steroid-dependent asthmatics

Previous results have demonstrated addition of long-acting beta2-adrenergic agonists to be beneficial in asthma patients already receiving inhaled corticosteroid. The purpose of this study was to determine, qualitatively as well as quantitatively, the steroid-sparing properties of salmeterol in stable asthma patients receiving maintenance inhaled corticosteroids (800-1600 microg day(-1)). In these patients, the daily dose of beclomethasone dipropionate was reduced by 200 microg each week until asthma deteriorated, with the minimal acceptable dose (MAD) being defined as the dose one step above deterioration (sensitivity period). Following this, patients received three times the MAD for 2 weeks. Patients were randomized to receive either salmeterol 50 microg twice daily or placebo and the MAD was again determined (treatment period). Forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1) was measured each week. Morning and evening peak expiratory flow (PEF), symptom score and use of bronchodilator were recorded each day. Fifteen patients received salmeterol and 19 placebo. The MAD was significantly lower in the salmeterol group compared with placebo during the treatment period (P<0.01). A 50% reduction of the MAD was achieved by more patients treated with salmeterol than placebo (P = 0.001). Salmeterol caused a significantly greater reduction in daytime symptom score and use of as-needed beta2-agoinist therapy between sensitivity and treatment periods compared with placebo (P<0.05 for both). The results demonstrate, that the addition of salmeterol to corticosteroid treatment offers a clinically relevant potential for reduction of inhaled corticosteroid dose in steroid sensitive asthmatics.     

Additional clinical benefit of enoxaparin in COPD patients receiving salmeterol and fluticasone propionate in combination

It is now well recognised that heparin possesses numerous anti-inflammatory properties in addition to its anticoagulant properties. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate the effects of the low molecular weight heparin, enoxaparin (ENX), as an add-on therapy for a period of 12 weeks, to inhaled salmeterol/fluticasone propionate (SLM/FP) combination in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Forty-six patients were randomised to receive 12 weeks of treatment in one of two treatment groups: (1) fixed combination of SLM 50 microg and FP 500 microg Diskus, one inhalation twice daily; or (2) as group 1 plus 20 mg ENX administered subcutaneously once daily for 12 weeks. Patients attended the clinic before and after 4, 8 and 12 weeks of treatment for evaluations of lung function, blood gas tensions, dyspnoea and supplemental salbutamol use. Thirty-six patients completed the 12-week treatment period, 20 from group 1 and 16 from group 2. A significant increase in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) over baseline was observed after 12 weeks of treatment in group 1 (0.145 L, 95% CI: 0.994-1.406, p<0.01), whilst significant increases in FEV1 over baseline were observed in group 2 after 4, 8 and 12 weeks of treatment with a maximum increase at 12 weeks of 0.244 L (95% CI: 1.175-1.596, p<0.01). Both treatment groups experienced similar improvements in blood gas tensions, dyspnoea and supplemental salbutamol use. Our results suggest that addition of ENX to conventional therapy of COPD may provide additional clinical benefit and must be further investigated as a treatment for COPD.     

Acute effects of higher than customary doses of salmeterol and salbutamol in patients with acute exacerbation of COPD

Worsening of underlying bronchospasm may be associated with acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). As airway obstruction becomes more severe, the therapeutic option is to add salbutamol, but not salmeterol, as needed to cause rapid relief of bronchospasm. Unfortunately the most effective dosage of beta2-agonists may increase above that recommended during acute exacerbations. In this study, we compared the acute effects of higher than customary doses of salmeterol and salbutamol in 20 patients with acute exacerbation of COPD. A dose-response curve to salmeterol pMDI, 25 microg/puff or salbutamol pMDI, 100 microg/puff, was constructed using 1, 1, and 2 puff' i.e., a total cumulative dose of 100 microg salmeterol or 400 microg salbutamol on 2 consecutive days. After baseline measurements, dose increments were given at 30-min intervals with measurements being made 25 min after each dose. Hear rate (HR) and pulse-oximetry (SpO2) measurements were then taken. Both salmeterol and salbutamol induced a larg and significant (P < 0.05) dose-dependent increase in FEV1 [mean differences from baseline (L) = after 100 microg salmeterol 0.174 (95% CI: 0.112 to 0.237); after 400 microg salbutamol: 0.165 (95% CI: 0.080 to 0.249)], in IC [mean differences from baseline (L) = after 100 microg salmeterol: 0.332 (95% CI: 0.165 to 0.499); after 400 microg salbutamol: 0.281 (95% CI: 0.107 to 0.456)] (Fig. 2), and in FVC mean differences from baseline (L) = after 100 microg salmeterol: 0.224 (95% CI: 0.117 to 0.331); after 400 microg salbutamol: 0.242 (95% CI: 0.090 to 0.395)]. There was no significant difference between the FEV1 values (P=0.418), the ICvalues (P=0.585), and the FVCvalue (P=0.610) after 100 microg salmeterol and 400 microg salbutamol. HR [mean differences from baseline (beats/min) = after 100 microg salmeterol: 3.15 (95% CI: -0.65 to 6.96); after 400 microg salbutamol: 2.30 (95% CI: -0.91 to 5.51)] and SpO2 [mean differences from baseline (%) = after 100 microg salmeterol: -0.20 (95% CI: -1.00 to 0.60); after 400 microg salbutamol: -0.11 (95% CI: -1.00 to 0.79)] did not change significantly from baseline (P > 0.05). These data indicate that salmeterol is effective and safe in the treatment of acute exacerbation of COPD and support its use in this clinical condition.     

重度COPD稳定期吸入沙美特罗/氟替卡松临床研究

目的重度COPD稳定期吸入沙美特罗/氟替卡松临床分析。方法重度COPD稳定期患者60例随机分为治疗组和对照组。对照组给予常规治疗,(应用氨茶碱、异丙托溴铵等)。治疗组在常规治疗的基础上吸入沙美特罗/氟替卡松(50/250)。在治疗前,治疗后4周、12周、24周测定肺功能。治疗24周后评价呼吸困难缓解情况和运动能力改善状况。结果治疗组在治疗后4周、12周、24周肺功能有明显改善,和对照组相比有显著差异(P0.05),治疗24周后,两组在活动能力、呼吸困难两方面均有改善,治疗组改善更明显。结论沙美特罗/氟替卡松是稳定期重度COPD患者的一种有效治疗方法。