Analysis of clinical variables of donors and recipients with respect to short-term graft outcome in human liver transplantation

Donor and recipient factors are closely associated with graft survival after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). This study was performed to analyze clinical characteristics of recipients and donors, which affect 30-day graft loss after OLT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred eighty-six livers from heart-beating donors were accepted between May 1997 and June 1998 at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center. Donor variables that were analyzed included age, sex, cold ischemia time (CIT), warm ischemia time (WIT), imported versus local procurement, cardiopulmonary arrest, serum sodium level, and dopamine dose. The recipient characteristics included native liver disease and UNOS status. Two-sided Fisher exact test and stepwise logistic regression were used for univariate and multivariate analyses. P-values < .05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Twenty-eight grafts (15.1%) were lost within 30 days of OLT. The following factors were found to adversely affect graft survival: donor sodium > 155 mEq/L (P = .002); CIT > 12 hours (P = .002); WIT > 45 minutes (P = .002); and imported liver graft (P = .048). Logistic regression revealed that donor sodium (odds ratio, 3.03; 95% CI, 1.05 to 8.74), CIT (OR 1.20; 95% CI 1.05 to 1.38), WIT (OR 1.06; 95% CI 1.01 to 1.09) were independent predictors of early graft loss. CONCLUSION: Donor hypernatremia as well as warm and cold ischemia times independently affect graft outcomes in the early postoperative period after OLT. Avoidance of long preservation and correction of donor sodium level are recommended to optimize results and survival in OLT.     

Association between donor-recipient serum sodium differences and orthotopic liver transplant graft function.

Previous studies have shown that donor hypernatremia and possibly recipient hyponatremia negatively impact graft function after orthotopic liver transplant (OLT). The purpose of this retrospective investigation was to determine whether measured differences in serum sodium values between cadaveric donors and OLT recipients (DeltaNa(+)) influence immediate postoperative allograft function and short-term patient outcomes. Two hundred and fifty patients that underwent OLT from January 2001 to December 2005 were included in this study. The DeltaNa(+) for each donor recipient pair was correlated with standard postoperative liver function tests as well as recipient length of intensive care unit stay (LOICUS), length of hospital stay (LOHS) and recipient survival. The relationship between donor hypernatremia (serum sodium >or= 155 mEq/mL), recipient hyponatremia (serum sodium level 相似文献   

Pancreas Donor Hypernatremia: Is it Really a Risk Factor for Simultaneous Pancreas-kidney Transplantation?

Introduction

Solid organ donor hypernatremia has been classically reported to be a risk factor for cell lysis and graft damage. National criteria for pancreatic donation consider severe hypernatremia (sodium level more than 160 mEq/L) to be relative exclusion criteria. The aim of our study is to review the postoperative outcomes of our simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPKT) sample in terms of pancreatic fistula, intra-abdominal abscesses, pancreatitis, pancreas graft thrombosis, early pancreatectomy, and reoperation rates regarding different ranges of donor sodium levels.

Outcome of imported liver allografts and impact on patient access to liver transplantation

Liver allografts declined by local transplant centers are then offered regionally or nationally as imported grafts. Most of these grafts are declined because of poor donor quality. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent liver transplantation between January 2004 and December 2005. There were 102 liver transplants in 98 recipients. They were divided into two groups: imported graft recipients (n = 37) and locally procured grafts recipients (n = 61). Eighty-six percent (32 of 37) of imported grafts were obtained from extended criteria donors defined as subjects treated with high doses of ionotropes with elevated liver enzymes, donor age over 70 years, macrosteatosis above 25%, positive hepatitis C or hepatitis B core antibody serology, systemic disease, history of cancer, hypernatremia, or with infection. The remaining grafts were declined due to unavailability of suitable recipients or social history. Recipient age and etiology of liver disease were similar for both groups. The mean MELD score was 22.1 +/- .9 among the imported graft recipients and 26.1 +/- 1 for the locally procured graft recipients (P < .01). There was no difference in blood loss or postoperative complications. Postoperative mean peak total bilirubin was similar in both groups. However, imported graft recipients had significantly higher mean peak AST (2436 +/- 282 vs 1380 +/- 165 U/L, P < .001) and ALT (1098 +/- 114 vs 803 +/- 87 U/L, P < .05). Primary graft nonfunction as well as 30 day and 1-year patient and graft survivals were similar for both groups. In conclusion, imported grafts can be transplanted in selected patients with outcomes comparable to locally procured grafts.     

Synergistic effect of cold and warm ischemia time on postoperative graft function and outcome in human liver transplantation

Prolonged cold ischemia time (CIT) during graft preservation and warm ischemia time (WIT) during rewarming time have been reported to cause postoperative graft dysfunction after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). However, the effects of both CIT and WIT in combination on patient and graft survivals are not yet defined. The aim of this study was to determine whether simultaneously prolonged CIT and WIT were associated with early graft outcomes after clinical OLT. For analysis of liver graft survival within 90 days of OLT and postoperative graft function, 186 consecutive OLT cases were divided into four groups as follows: group A, CIT < 12 hours and WIT < 45 minutes; group B, CIT > 12 hours and WIT < 45 minutes; group C, CIT < 12 hours and WIT > 45 minutes; and group D, CIT > 12 hours and WIT > 45 minutes. The graft loss rates were 5.4% in group A, 9.8% in group B, 11.1% in group C, and 42.9% in group D. The mean highest aspartate aminotransferase (AST) value after OLT in group D (3352.3 +/- 569.4 U/L) was significantly greater than those in groups A (1411.7 +/- 169.2 U/L) and B (1931.3 +/- 362.6 U/L). The simultaneously prolonged cold and warm ischemia times significantly caused hepatic allograft injury and failure, suggesting some cumulative effects of CIT and WIT on postoperative graft function.     

The impact of donor age on living donor liver transplantation

BACKGROUND: The impact of the age of the donor on the outcome of living related liver transplantation is yet to be clarified. METHODS: During October 14, 1996 and December 20, 1999, 34 living related liver transplantations were performed. Of these, 26 cases were performed using the extended left lobe graft, which were classified into three groups; younger donor group (group Y, donor age < 30, n = 7), middle-aged donor group (group M, 30 < or = donor age <50, n=13), and older donor group (group O, donor age < 50, n = 6). Early allograft function and regeneration were compared between these groups. RESULTS: There was no difference in standard liver volume, and predicted or harvested graft size between the three groups. Although serum transaminase and total bilirubin levels within postoperative day 7 were not different between the groups, the prothrombin time on postoperative day 3 was significantly longer in group O than in group Y. One week after transplantation, group Y had significantly greater graft/standard liver volume ratio than group O, and greater graft volume than group M and O. One month after transplantation, however, there was no significant difference in such graft size parameters between the groups. Graft and patient survival were comparable between the three groups. CONCLUSION: Although function and regeneration of the allografts from older donors in living donor liver transplantation is worse than those of their younger counterparts, the outcome is not affected by the age of the liver.     

Impact of donor serum sodium levels on outcome after heart transplantation.

We investigated the impact of elevated donor serum sodium levels on outcome after heart transplantation in 336 consecutive heart transplantations. Mean donor serum sodium was 148.2+/-10.2 mmol/liter (range 116 to 180 mmol/liter). Recipients were divided into 4 groups with serum sodium levels of 141, 147 and 155 mmol/liter, resulting in sodium levels of: 133+/-6.1 mmol/liter for Quartile A; 144+/-4.2 mmol/liter for Quartile B; 151+/-4.3 mmol/liter for Quartile C; and 162+/-6.6 mmol/liter for Quartile D, respectively (mean+/- standard deviation). Mean occurrence of primary graft failure (PGF) was 3.6% with the following quartile breakdown: A, 3.6%; B, 4.8%; C, 3.6%; and D, 2.4% (p=non-significant [NS]). Mean 5-year survival was 81.32% with: A, 83.51%; B, 76.03%; C, 80.47%; and D, 85.25% (p=NS). Coronary allograft vasculopathy (CAV) occurred in 19% of patients with a quartile breakdown of: A, 16.5%; B, 21%; C, 20%; and D, 14.5% (p=NS). No impact of donor serum sodium levels was seen on early post-operative results or on long-term outcome, indicating that cardiac allografts from donors with elevated sodium levels may be transplanted successfully with favorable results.     

Liver replacement with reduced size donor organs

End stage liver disease in children can be treated with orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Nevertheless, the expansion of this therapy in Europe has been limited because of the shortage of appropriate size-matched donors. One possible technical solution is the OLT of a liver graft previously reduced in size by in situ resection preceding the harvesting procedure. To study the impact of this technique we examined two different operative procedures performed on Landrace pigs. Group 1 consisted of 20 standard donor/recipient weight matched OLT. In group 2, 15 OLT were performed using right lateral and medial lobes (55% of the original donor liver). The donor/recipient weight ratio in the group was 2:1. Cold ischemia times were 90 +/- 16 min for group 1 and 98 +/- 9 min for group 2. It is emphasized that in contrast to all the other reports using resected liver grafts for OLT, the donor resection in our study was always performed in situ under normothermic conditions, preceding the harvesting procedure. This was designed to reduce the cold ischemia time. No significant technical problems were encountered. The biochemical results of group 2 pigs compared to group 1 demonstrate an analogous, postoperative course. This might be explained by regenerative stimuli acting on the resected liver tissues and enhancing their metabolic function. These data support the conclusion that resected adult donor liver grafts may be used for pediatric transplant recipients.     

Impact of cumulative risk factors for expanded criteria donors on early survival after liver transplantation

There are various options to help overcome the organ shortage, including performing transplants using grafts from marginal donors with characteristics previously described as unacceptable because of the high risk of graft failure. Nowadays, expanded criteria donors for liver transplantation (OLT) is a strategy used routinely by many teams. Some donor features have been suggested to jeopardize initial function or survival; when these features are aggregated, they may impact prognosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of donor risk factors on early patient survival and retransplantation. Donor risk factors were considered to be older than 60 years, body mass index > 30, serum sodium level > 155 mEq/L, cold ischemia time > 12 hours, and intensive care unit stay > 4 days. We prospectively recorded data from 139 patients who underwent 152 OLT from March 2003 to May 2007. Patients were classified into four groups: I, no risk factors; II, one risk factor; III, two risk factors; IV, three or more risk factors. Retransplantation or OLT due to acute liver failure was considered to be an exclusion criterion. Early overall survival rate was 83.76%; 12 retransplantations were required (10.25%). Comparing the four groups, patient survivals (P = .41) and retransplantation rates (P = .518) were similar. In conclusion, cumulative risk factors showed no impact on early (30-day) recipient survival and or on the necessity of retransplantation after OLT.     

腹腔镜技术获取活体供肾的基础研究

目的探讨建立小猪腹腔镜活体供肾切取和原位肾移植模型的可行性以及CO2气腹对小猪移植肾功能恢复及组织形态的影响。方法 40头滇南小耳猪经配型分为CO2气腹腹腔镜活体供肾切取组（LDN组,n=20）和开放活体供肾切取组（ODN组,n=20）,每组供、受体均为10头;两组分别采用腹腔镜和开放手术经腹膜后入路切取供肾后行原位肾移植。术后监测尿量、血清肌酐（SCr）及血尿素氮（BUN）;术后30d切取移植肾组织制作石蜡切片用于组织病理检查。结果 LDN组和ODN组均成功建立6例小猪原位肾移植模型,移植成功率均为60%（6/10）。LDN组和ODN组热缺血时间分别为（89±6）s和（30±11）s,差异有统计学意义（t=11.53,P〈0.05）。术后第3天LDN组和ODN组SCr分别为（152±16）μmol/L和（126±8）μmol/L,BUN分别为（7.26±0.99）mmol/L和（2.87±0.39）mmol/L,差异均有统计学意义（F=11.003,P〈0.05;F=6.303,P〈0.05）;术后第7天LDN组和ODN组SCr分别为（121±5）μmol/L和（89±10）μmol/L,BUN分别为（2.87±0.39）mmol/L和（1.63±0.38）mmol/L,差异均有统计学意义（F=48.301,P〈0.05;F=31.719,P〈0.05）。移植肾组织病理检查结果：HE染色显示LDN组移植肾肾小管上皮细胞损伤、肾间质水肿及炎性细胞浸润较ODN组稍重,但差异无统计学意义（P〉0.05）;过碘酸-Schiff染色及Masson染色显示两组移植肾病理改变无特异性。结论腹腔镜活体供肾切取术可影响移植肾的早期恢复,但对术后晚期移植肾功能及病理改变的影响与开放活体供肾切取术比较无差异。建立小猪经腹膜后入路腹腔镜活体供肾切取和原位肾移植模型具有可行性。     

Split Liver Transplant From Deceased Marginal Donor: A Case Report

The relative paucity of deceased donor organs and the progressive increase in patients with cirrhosis have led transplant centers to consider organs from marginal donors (elderly donors, prolonged stay in the intensive care unit (ICU), liver steatosis—steatotic grafts, severe hypernatremia, and use of inotropes). Recently, the use of those marginal grafts has increased, but splitting liver is still debatable.Herein, we present a 28-year-old deceased donor who had a history of traumatic brain injury. The patient stayed in ICU for 3 days with high sodium level (188 mEq/L) and was hemodynamically supported with single inotrope. At the time of procurement, core biopsies were taken from the right lobe and left lateral segment of the liver, with results demonstrating 5% necrosis. A decision was made for split liver transplant as left lateral sector and extended right lobe.Liver graft was divided into a left lateral segment to be transplanted to a 4-year-old child with secondary biliary cirrhosis due to previous liver transplant and a right extended liver lobe for an adult patient with hepatocellular carcinoma waiting 10 months on the waiting list. Both liver transplants were performed uneventfully. Patients were discharged on the 11^th and 56^th days after transplant. The liver function tests remained normal during the follow up period of 2 years.A marginal graft with more than one risk factor should not be discarded liberally. Splitting such grafts could be considered in a highly selective recipients.     

Influence of cadaver donor age on renal graft survival

It has been suggested that kidneys from young and old donors do less well after transplantation. We have studied this problem in a retrospective analysis of all cadaveric transplants performed in our center during the last 10 years. All patients were followed for at least six months. Recipients younger than 16 years were excluded from this analysis. Thirty-six patients received a kidney from a donor younger than 11 years (group A), 374 received a kidney from a donor aged between 11 and 51 years (group B) and 21 a kidney from a donor aged older than 51 years (group C). In the young donor age group graft survival was significantly worse than in the two other groups with a one year graft survival of 45.6%, 75.0% and 75.9% for group A, B and C respectively. There were significantly more technical failures in group A, but if these were excluded a significant difference in graft survival remained present. At three months there were no significant differences in hypertension, proteinuria, or serum creatinine between the three groups. These results suggest that young but not old donor kidneys have a worse graft survival. This decreased graft survival is only partly caused by technical problems. Therefore young grafts also seem to be more susceptible to the host's immune response.     

Utilization of extended donor criteria liver allografts maximizes donor use and patient access to liver transplantation

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of systematic utilization of extended donor criteria liver allografts (EDC), including living donor allografts (LDLT), on patient access to liver transplantation (LTX). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Utilization of liver allografts that do not meet traditional donor criteria (EDC) offer immediate expansion of the donor pool. EDC are typically allocated by transplant center rather than regional wait-list priority (RA). This single-institution series compares outcomes of EDC and RA allocation to determine the impact of EDC utilization on donor use and patient access to LTX. METHODS: The authors conducted a retrospective analysis of 99 EDC recipients (49 deceased donor, 50 LDLT) and 116 RA recipients from April 2001 through April 2004. Deceased-donor EDC included: age >65 years, donation after cardiac death, positive viral serology (hepatitis C, hepatitis B core antibody, human T-cell lymphotrophic), split-liver, hypernatremia, prior carcinoma, steatosis, and behavioral high-risk donors. Outcome variables included patient and graft survival, hospitalization, initial graft function, and complication categorized as: biliary, vascular, wound, and other. RESULTS: EDC recipients were more frequently diagnosed with hepatitis C virus or hepatocellular carcinoma and had a lower model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score at LTX (P < 0.01). Wait-time, technical complications, and hospitalization were comparable. Log-rank analysis of Kaplan-Meier survival estimates demonstrated no difference in patient or graft survival; however, deaths among deceased-donor EDC recipients were frequently the result of patient comorbidities, whereas LDLT and RA deaths resulted from graft failure (P < 0.01). EDC increased patient access to LTX by 77% and reduced pre-LTX mortality by over 50% compared with regional data (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Systematic EDC utilization maximizes donor use, increases access to LTX, and significantly reduces wait-list mortality by providing satisfactory outcomes to select recipients.     

Strategies to expand the donor pool for pancreas transplantation

BACKGROUND: Our organ procurement organization has been forced to liberalize the donor criteria in order to expand the donor pool for pancreas transplantation. In this report, we describe our experience using whole organ pancreatic grafts from "marginal" donors, which include grafts obtained from donors over 45 years of age and from donors who were identified to be hemodynamically unstable at the time of organ retrieval. METHODS: A prospective study was performed between July 1994 and March 1998, during which time 137 pancreas transplants were performed at our center using organs procured by our own surgeons (organs sent by other teams were excluded). The rapid en bloc technique was used exclusively. The use of pancreatic grafts from marginal donors was analyzed for short-term and overall graft survival, and for delayed graft function and complications. RESULTS: Overall pancreas graft survival for our series was 83%, with a mean follow-up of 23 months. There were 22 pancreas grafts from donors over 45 years of age, 13 of whom were greater than 50 years of age. The actual graft survival rate of the over-45 donor group was 86%. Fifty-one grafts were removed from hemodynamically unstable donors on high-dose vasopressors. The actual graft survival in this group was 86%. There was no significant difference found in graft survival between recipients of pancreatic grafts from marginal and nonmarginal donors. Delayed graft function was exhibited by more recipients of grafts from donors on high-dose vasopressors (P<0.05), but this had no effect on long-term graft survival and endocrine function. Recipients of marginal donor grafts did not have higher rates of complication compared to recipients of nonmarginal grafts. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our results, we currently employ a graft selection strategy not limited by donor age or hemodynamic stability. Our selection of pancreas organs for transplantation is based on careful inspection of the pancreas and determination of the adequacy of the ex vivo flush. Our results suggest that the current pancreas donor pool may be expanded substantially.     

Prolongation of adult skin allograft survival by cotransplantation of neonatal skin in antilymphocyte serum and donor bone marrow cell-treated mice

Adult male B6AF1 (H-2KIb/kDb/d) mice were given skin allografts from adult male C3H (H-2k) mice, with and without contralateral cotransplants. The cotransplants were of either adult or neonatal (less than 24 hr) C3H skin. In recipient mice treated peritransplantation with antilymphocyte serum and posttransplantation with an i.v. injection of donor-strain bone marrow cells, the presence of a neonatal cotransplant resulted in significantly longer survival of the adult grafts. Median survival time (MST) for adult grafts, for the group that received a neonatal cotransplant was greater than 100 days, in comparison to MSTs of 59 days and 55 days for the groups that received only single adult grafts or the adult graft with an adult cotransplant. These results suggest an active immunomodulatory contribution of neonatal tissue, and we term this phenomenon the "cotransplant effect." This prolongation of survival of the adult grafts by the neonatal cotransplants was statistically significant in animals treated with ALS and BMC, but not in recipients that were treated with ALS only (MST = 34 days, in comparison with 29 days for groups that received either a single adult graft or an adult graft with an adult cotransplant). The graft-prolonging effects of an infusion of donor BMC thus appear to potentiate the expression of the cotransplant effect. An understanding of this effect may lead to improved methods of controlling the allograft response to adult tissues in the clinical setting.     

Primary nonfunction. Is there a contribution from the back table bath?

A persistent problem in orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is primary nonfunction (PNF) of the hepatic allograft. In most instances the cause of the failure is unknown. In an attempt to minimize these graft failure, modifications in the procurement and operative procedure have been investigated. One change in the procedure at the University of Nebraska Medical Center has been the monitoring of the temperature of the fluid in the back table bath during preparation of the donor liver. Our initial procedure involved creating an ice slurry of lactated Ringer's solution and ice slush in which the donor liver was then prepared. The temperature of this ice slurry was retrospectively found to be from -3 degrees C to -1 degrees C (group I). In this group there was a higher-than-expected incidence of PNF. To investigate whether the temperature of the back table bath influenced the incidence of PNF, beginning with transplant No. 42 the preparation of the back table bath was modified. The bath was created by adding a small amount of PlasmaLyte slush to 2 L of PlasmaLyte (group II). The temperature of the bath was maintained at 2-4 degrees C. Data were collected on 100 consecutive liver transplants. All transplants were performed using standard techniques, the operation for the two groups differing only as described above. Transaminase levels were followed as an index of the allograft function and were expected to begin to normalize within 2-3 days after transplantation. While both groups display this trend, transaminase levels in group II were significantly lower postoperatively than group I levels (P less than 0.05). Preoperative values were similar. There were 7 PNFs in group I; 0 in group II (P less than 0.005). We feel that the change in the back table procedure has positively influenced the function of the hepatic allografts, and we conclude that transplant centers need to monitor the temperature at which all allografts are stored and prepared, and the cognizant that this may influence the postoperative function of the transplanted liver.     

Segmental regeneration in right-lobe liver grafts in adult living donor liver transplant

Chen H‐L, Tsang LL‐C, Concejero AM, Huang T‐L, Chen T‐Y, Ou H‐Y, Yu C‐Y, Chen C‐L, Cheng Y‐F. Segmental regeneration in right‐lobe liver grafts in adult living donor liver transplant. Abstract:  Our aim is to evaluate the relationship and impact of right‐lobe (RL) liver grafts procured with or without the middle hepatic vein (MHV) trunk and MHV tributary reconstruction on segmental regeneration of these grafts in adult living donor liver transplantation (ALDLT). Patients underwent primary ALDLT using a RL liver graft were divided into three groups according to graft type: with MHV tributary reconstruction (group I), without MHV tributary reconstruction (group II), and with inclusion of the MHV trunk (group III). The overall graft volume and the volumes of the anterior and posterior segments of the grafts six months post‐transplant, evaluated using computed tomography, were calculated as the regeneration indices. Optimal regeneration of the RL liver graft was achieved in the three groups of patients. There was no significant difference in the regeneration indices between groups I (149.4%) and III (143.6%). However, in group II (112.4%) without MHV or tributary reconstruction, the anterior regenerative index was lower than the other two groups and exhibited transient prolonged hyperbilirubinemia. Segmental graft regeneration is maximized by adequate venous drainage. Inclusion of the MHV trunk or MHV tributary reconstruction influences segmental liver regeneration and preclude transient hyperbilirubinemia in the early post‐liver transplant phase.     

Right posterior segment graft for living donor liver transplantation: A systematic review

The clinical significance of the right posterior segment (RPS) graft in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is unknown because of its limited use and technical concerns. This study aimed to review published studies investigating outcomes of RPS grafts. The systematic literature search was conducted to retrieve data from Embase, Medline Ovid, Web of Science, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Google Scholar. Among the 388 articles, six retrospective studies from Asian countries were included. The overall incidences of major and minor complications after RPS graft procurement were 5.6% and 34.6%, respectively and no donor deaths were reported. RPS graft recipients had the following postoperative complications: overall mortality rate, 14.5%; bile leakage, 8.7%, biliary stenosis, 18.8%, hepatic artery thrombosis, 8.7%, and liver re-transplantation, 2.9%. The RPS graft can be considered as an option for a living liver graft respecting donor safety under strict selection criteria and surgical strategy. The precise evaluation and understanding of anatomical variations and volumetric analyses is critical for selecting donors and planning the surgical strategy in the RPS grafts procurement. The RPS grafts procurement requires carefully dissection of the hepatic artery and portal vein, safely confirmation of the bile duct, and precisely parenchymal transection. However, further experience is needed to clarify the significance of the RPS graft in LDLT. The special technical requirements should limit this donor procedure to centers with a high level of experience in LDLT.     

The marginal donor: a single-center experience in orthotopic liver transplantation

The use of marginal donors has become more common worldwide due to the sharp increase in recipients with a consequent shortage of suitable organs. The definition of "marginal donor" has not been reached by all centers. We herein analyzed our single-center experience over the last 3 years in liver transplantation (OLT) to evaluate the outcomes of using a high percentage of so-called "marginal donors", according to the current classification from the National (Italian) Center of Transplantation (CNT). Among the 78 OLT performed in 77 patients from January 1, 2003 to October 31, 2005, donor livers were divided into three groups according to the CNT classification. We evaluated donor variables, cold ischemia time (CIT), warm ischemia time (WIT), MELD score, and length of hospital stay. Histologic graft steatosis was correlated with estimated steatosis by ultrasound. There were no differences among the three graft recipient groups concerning CIT, WIT, MELD score, and the length of hospital stay. Steatosis is indicated in all series as a definite variable for a higher risk of postoperative mortality. CIT is necessarily related to donor retrieval policy and organization. Donor age seemed also to be related to a possible increase in postoperative mortality, but there are significant variations in the definition of the age limit. We failed to observe a correlation between a higher mortality rate and any of the variables currently listed to define a "marginal donor." A shorter CIT seemed to positively influence the role played by the other variables identifying a "marginal liver." Finally, the use of HCV(+) or HBV(+) grafts did not lead to an increased mortality.     

Occult hepatitis B virus infection in liver transplant recipients with recurrent hepatitis C: relationship with donor age and fibrosis progression

Abstract:  Liver transplantation (OLT) recipients who receive a graft from donors positive for hepatitis B virus (HBV) anti-core antibodies may develop overt " de novo " HBV infection. The study was undertaken to explore how often HBV infection may remain occult after OLT for hepatitis C, and whether it may represent a factor of graft fibrosis progression. We studied 30 consecutive patients transplanted for hepatitis C liver disease. Specimens from the native liver and from the graft were searched for occult HBV infection (O-HBV). In the native liver, 8/30 patients had detectable O-HBV; during the follow-up, O-HBV infection was demonstrated in 14 graft specimens. Graft O-HBV was associated with older donor age (≥50 yr; 8/9 vs. 6/21, p < 0.005). Recipients with graft O-HBV and no O-HBV in the native liver who received their grafts from donors aged >40 yr had faster fibrosis progression than recipients with no post-transplant O-HBV, whose grafts came from donors aged >40 yr and recipients whose grafts came from donors aged ≤40 yr (4/7 vs. 1/7 vs. 2/16, p < 0.05). In OLT recipients, O-HBV is more likely to occur when grafts are obtained from aged donors and may affect the rate of fibrosis progression because of recurrent hepatitis C.