Phase I and pharmacokinetics studies of prochlorperazine 2-h i.v. infusion as a doxorubicin-efflux blocker

In an earlier phase I study, we reported that the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) of prochlorperazine (PCZ) given as a 15-min i.v. infusion was 75 mg/m². The highest peak plasma PCZ concentration achieved was 1100 ng/ml. The present study was conducted to determine if PCZ levels high enough to block doxorubicin (DOX) efflux in vitro could be achieved and sustained in vivo by increasing the duration of i.v. infusion from 15 min to 2 h. The treatment schedule consisted of i.v. prehydration with at least 500 ml normal saline (NS) and administration of a fixed standard dose of 60 mg/m² DOX as an i.v. bolus over 15 min followed by i.v. doses of 75, 105, 135, or 180 mg/m² PCZ in 250 ml NS over 2 h. The hematologic toxicities attributable to DOX were as expected and independent of the PCZ dose. Toxicities attributable to PCZ were sedation, dryness of mouth, anxiety, akathisia, hypotension, cramps, and confusion. The MTD of PCZ was 180 mg/m². Large interpatient variation in peak PCZ plasma levels (91–3215 ng/ml) was seen, with the plasma half-life (t1/2) being approximately 57 min in patients given 135–180 mg/m² PCZ. The volume of distribution (V_d), total clearance (Cl_T), and area under the curve (AUC) were 350.1±183.8 l/m², 260.7±142.7 l m² h^–1 and 1539±922 ng ml h^–1, respectively, in patients given 180 mg/m² PCZ and the respective values for patients receiving 135 mg/m² were 48.9±23.76 l/m², 33.2±2.62 l m² h^–1, and 4117±302 ng ml h^–1. High PCZ plasma levels (>600 ng/ml) were sustained in all patients treated with 135 mg/m² PCZ for up to 24 h. DOX plasma elimination was biphasic at 135 and 180 mg/m² PCZ, and a>10-ng/ml DOX plasma level was maintained for 24 h. Partial responses were seen in three of six patients with malignant mesothelioma, in two of ten patients with non-small-cell lung carcinoma, and in the single patient with hepatoma. Our data show that PCZ can be safely given as a 2-h infusion at 135 mg/m² with clinically manageable toxicities. The antitumor activity of the combination of DOX and PCZ needs to be confirmed in phase II trials.This work was supported by NIH grant R01 CA-29360 and S1488, CRC grant M01 RR-05280, and the Joan Levy Cancer Foundation. This paper was presented at the meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research, Orlando, Florida, May 19–22, 1993     

Principles and practice of clinical phase I studies

There is clear evidence that the epidemiologic importance of malignant diseases will continue to rise in the future. This creates the ethical obligation to further intensify the search for improved systemic treatment options. This review is focussed on principles and practices of phase I trials. The trial methodology outlined here is not only used for first-in-human doses of new chemical entities but also for the investigation of new treatment schedules and combinations. The primary endpoints as well as preclinical requirements are addressed. Although for formal reasons antitumor activity cannot be an endpoint in phase I studies the careful observation and documentation of potential anticancer efficacy is of utmost importance in these early clinical trials. Signals of antitumor activity may serve as important guidance for subsequent clinical development plans. Inclusion criteria, dose escalation schemes, and the importance of the concept of the maximum tolerable dose (MTD) are addressed together with ethical principles of exposure to novel chemical agents.     

Vorinostat as a radiosensitizer for brain metastasis: a phase I clinical trial

Perform a phase I study to evaluate the safety, and tolerability of vorinostat, an HDAC inhibitor, when combined with whole brain radiation treatment (WBRT) in patients with brain metastasis. A multi-institutional phase I clinical trial enrolled patients with a histological diagnosis of malignancy and radiographic evidence of brain metastasis. WBRT was 37.5 Gy in 2.5 Gy fractions delivered over 3 weeks. Vorinostat was administrated by mouth, once daily, Monday through Friday, concurrently with radiation treatment. The vorinostat dose was escalated from 200 to 400 mg daily using a 3+3 trial design. Seventeen patients were enrolled, 4 patients were excluded from the analysis due to either incorrect radiation dose (n = 1), or early treatment termination due to disease progression (n = 3). There were no treatment related grade 3 or higher toxicities in the 200 and 300 mg dose levels. In the 400 mg cohort there was a grade 3 pulmonary embolus and one death within 30 days of treatment. Both events were most likely related to disease progression rather than treatment; nonetheless, we conservatively classified the death as a dose limiting toxicity. We found Vorinostat administered with concurrent WBRT to be well tolerated to a dose of 300 mg once daily. This is the recommended dose for phase II study.     

Phase I studies with trimetrexate: clinical pharmacology, analytical methodology, and pharmacokinetics

Twenty-two patients with advanced solid tumors were treated with a quinazoline folate antagonist, trimetrexate, to determine the toxicity spectrum, the maximal tolerated dose, and the pharmacokinetics of the drug. Negligible toxicity was seen with single doses of 10-70 mg/m2 given as a 1-h infusion. Single doses of 120 mg/m2 infused over 1 h caused moderate to grade 4 toxicity in five of nine patients treated. Two patients who had no toxicity at this level were escalated to a dose of 213 mg/m2 with mild to moderate toxicity. The primary dose-limiting toxicity was myelosuppression. Moderate transaminase elevations, rash, anorexia, nausea and vomiting, and mucositis were occasionally seen. Although there was variation in dose tolerance to this drug, with selected patients able to tolerate higher doses, we consider 120 mg/m2 every 2 weeks to be the maximal tolerated dose, and the recommended Phase II starting dose. Trimetrexate plasma concentration-time curves were best described as biphasic (N = 9) or triphasic (N = 5) in form. The half-life of the terminal elimination-phase was 16.4 h. The mean residence time was 17.8 h. The volume of distribution of the plasma compartment and the volume of distribution at steady-state were 0.17 and 0.62 liter/kg, respectively. Plasma clearance was 53 ml/min. Plasma concentrations as determined by dihydrofolate reductase enzyme inhibition assay and high-performance liquid chromatography were initially identical, but diverged at later times. Divergences were seen also in urinary recovery as determined by the two methods. Both results suggest the appearance of metabolite(s) of trimetrexate which can inhibit dihydrofolate reductase. Measurable objective solid tumor responses were not seen in this Phase I study, although three patients with colon cancer had stable disease lasting 18, 26, and 26 weeks, respectively.     

Antibody-directed enzyme prodrug therapy: pharmacokinetics and plasma levels of prodrug and drug in a phase I clinical trial

Antibody-directed enzyme prodrug therapy (ADEPT) was administered to ten patients in a phase I clinical trial. The aim was to measure plasma levels of the prodrug 4-[(2-chloroethyl)(2-mesyloxyethyl) amino] benzoyl-l-glutamic acid (CMDA) and the bifunctional alkylating drug (CJS11) released from it by the action of tumour-localised carboxypeptidase G2 (CPG2) enzyme. New techniques were developed to extract the prodrug and drug from plasma by solid-phase adsorbtion and elution and to measure CPG2 activity in plasma and tissue. All extracts were analysed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS). CPG2 activity was found in metastatic tumour biopsies but not in normal tissue, indicating that localisation had been successful. The clearing agent SB43-gal, given at 46.5 mg/m², achieved the aim of clearing non-tumour-localised enzyme in the circulation, indicating that conversion of prodrug to drug could take place only at the site of localised conjugate. Plasma prodrug did not always remain above its required threshold of 3 μM for the “therapeutic window” of 120 min after dosing, but the presence of residual prodrug after the first administration of each day indicated that this could be achieved during the remaining four doses over the following 8 h. Despite considerable inter-patient prodrug plasma concentration variability, the elimination half-life of the prodrug was remarkably reproducible at 18 ± 8 min. Rapid appearance of the drug in plasma indicated that successful conversion from the prodrug had taken place, but also undesirable leakback from the site of localisation into the bloodstream. However, drug plasma levels fell rapidly by at least 50% at between 10 and 60 min with a half-life of 36 ± 14 min. Analysis of the plasma extracts by LC/MS indicated that this technique might be used to confirm qualitatively the presence of prodrug, drug and their metabolites. Received: 21 July 1996 / Accepted: 20 January 1997     

Plasma pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a new prodrug N-l-leucyldoxorubicin and its metabolites in a phase I clinical trial.

PURPOSE: N-l-leucyldoxorubicin (Leu-Dox) was developed as a prodrug of doxorubicin (Dox) to circumvent the cardiotoxicity associated with repeated administration of Dox. Our purpose was to assess the pharmacokinetics of Leu-Dox, Dox, doxorubicinol (Dol) and four other metabolites for pharmacokinetically guided dose-escalation and to verify the prodrug character of Leu-Dox. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Blood and urine of 14 patients were sampled during the phase I clinical trial and analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography. Dose levels of Leu-Dox ranged from 18 mg/m2 to 225 mg/m2, the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD). Hematologic parameters were monitored regularly in each patient. RESULTS: Leu-Dox was rapidly distributed (half-life at alpha phase [t1/2 alpha] = 2.5 +/- 0.6 minutes) followed by a biphasic elimination (half-life at beta phase [t1/2 beta] = 17.4 +/- 7.3 minutes; half-life at gamma phase [t1/2 gamma] = 1.5 +/- 0.5 hours), as measured over the first 12 hours after administration. In three patients, in whom Leu-Dox was found in the plasma for up to 48 hours after injection, a final elimination half-life (t1/2,elim) of 16 hours was observed. The t1/2,elim of Leu-Dox was short (0.6 to 16.5 hours) compared with the t1/2,elim of Dox (38 +/- 11 hours). The mean residence time and apparent volume of distribution were 23 +/- 5 minutes and 19 +/- 6 L/m2, respectively. Only 1.5% to 5% of the dose was excreted in the urine over 48 hours, with Dox as major constituent. Dox was rapidly formed, reaching its maximum concentration within 10 minutes after the end of Leu-Dox infusion. Areas under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC infinity, mean +/- SD, n = 16) of Leu-Dox, Dox, and Dol were 115 +/- 27 mumol.min/L, 41 +/- 12 mumol.min/L, and 33 +/- 14 mumol.min/L after a dose of 60 mg/m2 Leu-Dox (= 86 mumol/m2). After the same molar dose of Dox (50 mg/m2 = 86 mumol/m2), the AUC infinity of Dox was 179 mumol.min/L, indicating that Leu-Dox was converted into Dox for 23% in the plasma compartment. The AUCs infinity of Leu-Dox, Dox, and Dol increased linearly with the dose. Negligible AUCs were observed for the other four metabolites. The AUCs infinity of Leu-Dox and Dox at the MTD (517 and 145 mumol.min/L, respectively) were lower than those in mice at the LD10 (1,930 and 798 mumol.min/L, respectively), which means that the MTD could not be predicted from the preclinical pharmacokinetics in mice. Hematologic toxicity, especially the WBC count, appeared to correlate much better with the AUC of Dox (r = .91) than with the AUC of Leu-Dox (r = .74), thus confirming the prodrug character of Leu-Dox. CONCLUSIONS: Dox is rapidly formed from Leu-Dox, and seems causative in the observed myelotoxicity. The MTD could not be predicted from the AUC at the LD10 in mice.     

A phase I clinical study of Nimorazole as a hypoxic radiosensitizer

Nimorazole, a 5-Nitromidazole compound has been shown in animal studies to have similar radiosensitizing properties to misonidazole at clinically acceptable dose levels. The drug is well absorbed in humans after oral administration with peak plasma levels occurring around 90 min after ingestion (range 35-135 min) and a plasma half life between 2 and 4.8 hours. Total doses of Nimorazole up to 60 grams given in daily doses with conventional radiation therapy have demonstrated a significant lack of side effects, in particular no demonstrable neurotoxicity.     

A phase I study of intravenous iododeoxyuridine as a clinical radiosensitizer

Twenty-four patients with locally advanced (19 patients) or metastatic (5 patients) tumors were treated in a Phase I study combining constant intravenous infusions of iododeoxyuridine (IUdR) and hyperfractionated radiation therapy. IUdR was given as a constant infusion for 12 hours/day for two separate 14-day infusion periods in most patients. The dose of IUdR was escalated from 250 to 1200 mg/m2/12-hour infusion in this study. The initial tumor volume was treated to 45 Gy/1.5 Gy BID/3 weeks followed by a cone-down boost to 20-25 Gy/1.25 Gy BID/2 weeks after a planned 2-week break. THe IUdR infusion preceded the initial and cone-down irradiation by 1 week. Local acute toxicity (within the radiation volume) was uncommon and few patients required an alteration of the planned treatment schedule. Two patients developed late local toxicity with one patient showing clinical signs of radiation hepatitis and another patient developing a large bowel obstruction that required surgical bypass. Dose-limiting systemic toxicity was confined to the bone marrow with moderate to severe thrombocytopenia developing on Day 10-14 of infusions at 1200 mg/m2/12 hours. Mild stomatitis and partial alopecia occurred in some patients at this dose level. No systemic skin toxicity was seen. Pharmacology studies revealed steady-state arterial plasma levels of IUdR of 1 to 8 X 10(-6) M over the dose range used. In vivo IUdR incorporation into tumors was studied in three patients with high-grade sarcomas using an anti-IUdR monoclonal antibody and immunohistochemistry and demonstrated incorporation in up to 50-70% of tumor cells. The preliminary treatment results, particularly in patients with unresectable sarcomas, are encouraging. In comparison to our previous experience with intravenous bromodeoxyuridine, this Phase I study of IUdR shows less systemic toxicity (especially to skin), higher (2-3X) steady-state arterial levels, and comparable in vivo tumor cell incorporation.     

Pharmacokinetic and biotransformation studies of ormaplatin in conjunction with a phase I clinical trial

Ormaplatin is a second-generation platinum (Pt) analogue with in vitro activity against some cisplatin-resistant malignant cell lines. We have evaluated the pharmacokinetics and biotransformations of ormaplatin during a phase I trial in which ormaplatin was administered by daily 30-min infusions on 5 consecutive days every 28 days. Sixteen patients received 25 courses at doses ranging from 5.0 to 11.6 mg/m² per day. Pharmacokinetic parameters determined for ultrafilterable Pt measured by atomic absorption spectrophotometry revealed a short half-life (t_1/2 16 min), moderate volume of distribution (Vd 12 l/m²), and relatively fast systemic clearance (Cls 544 ml/min per m²). Cls and percentage of drug unbound decreased during the 5-day administration period. Average systemic exposure increased with dose; however, inter-individual variability in Cls produced overlap in systemic exposure between the dose levels. The major active biotransformation product [PtCl₂(dach)] was evaluated at the highest dose level by HPLC. This product decayed monoexponentially with a mean t_1/2 of 13 min and a higher degree of pharmacokinetic variability than that of ultrafilterable Pt at this dose. No uncreacted ormaplatin was detected; however, several inactive biotransformation products persisted for at least 120 min. Approximately 32% of the dose was excreted in the urine during the first day, one-third of this during the initial 1.5 h. The human pharmacokinetic characteristics of ormaplatin resemble those of cisplatin; however, additional study will be required to discern which analyte of ormaplatin correlates best with clinical effects.The biotransformation studies were supported by the Upjohn Company.     

A clinical pharmacokinetics study of carzelesin given by short-term intravenous infusion in a phase I study

We investigated the pharmacokinetic behavior of carzelesin in 31 patients receiving this drug by 10-min intravenous infusion in a Phase I clinical trial, which was conducted at institutions in Nijmegen (institution 1) and Brussels (institution 2). The dose steps were 24, 48, 96, 130, 150, 170, 210, 250, and 300 μg/m². Carzelesin is a cyclopropylpyrroloindole prodrug that requires metabolic activation via U-76,073 to U-76,074. The lower limit of quantitation (LLQ) of the high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method used in this study was 1 ng/ml for the parent drug and its metabolic products. Carzelesin was rapidly eliminated from plasma (elimination half-life 23 ± 9 min; mean value ± SD). At all dose levels, U-76,073 was found as early as in the first samples taken after the start of the infusion. However, the concentration of U-76,074 exceeded the LLQ for only short periods and only at the higher dose levels. Although the plasma levels of all three compounds were well above the respective IC₅₀ values obtained by in vitro clonogenic assays, they were much lower than those observed in a preclinical study in mice. There was a substantial discrepancy in the mean plasma clearance␣observed between patients from institution 1 (7.9 ± 2.1 l h⁻¹ m⁻²) and those from institution 2 (18.4 ± 13.6 l h⁻¹ m⁻²; P = 0.038), probably reflecting problems with drug administration in the latter institution. The results recorded for patients in institution 1 indicated that the AUC increased proportionately with increasing doses. There was a good correlation between the maximal plasma concentration and the AUC, enabling future monitoring of drug exposure from one timed blood sample. Urinary excretion of carzelesin was below 1% of the delivered dose. Received: 6 May 1997 / Accepted: 5 September 1997     

Pharmacokinetic and biochemical studies on acivicin in phase I clinical trials

Acivicin pharmacokinetics were studied in Phase I patients receiving i.v. treatment on single-dose or daily x5 (daily times five doses) regimens repeated every 3 weeks. In 14 patients, the time course of plasma concentrations was characterized by a biexponential equation with a terminal (elimination-phase) half-life of 9.92 +/- 3.91 h (mean +/- SD), distribution phase half-life of 0.32 +/- 0.28 h, total body clearance of 1.69 +/- 0.48 liters/h/m2, and volume of distribution of 21.79 +/- 2.94 liters/m2. Acivicin kinetics appeared to be dose-independent over the range of 8.5-150 mg/m2/day. Urinary excretion of intact acivicin in nine patients ranged from 2-42% in the first 24 h following administration; interpatient variability in urinary excretion was large, but daily urinary recovery within patients on the daily x5 schedule was quite consistent. Measurements of acivicin effects on the activity of carbamyl phosphate synthetase II (CPS II) were conducted using leukocytes and/or malignant ascites of three colon cancer patients. Acivicin given to one patient at 8.5 mg/m2/day on the daily x5 schedule caused a 70% reduction in leukocyte CPS II activity within 5 h after therapy was initiated. Leukocyte CPS II activity remained suppressed at this level over the 5-day dosing regimen. In this patient, CPS II activity in malignant ascitic cells had decreased by 75% on day 4 of the daily x5 regimen. On the single dose schedule, treatment of two patients with 100 mg/m2 caused leukocyte CPS II activity to decrease by greater than 90% within 4 h of treatment with gradual recovery over the next 2 days.     

Sorafenib and dacarbazine as first-line therapy for advanced melanoma: phase I and open-label phase II studies

Method:

The safety of oral sorafenib up to a maximum protocol-specified dose combined with dacarbazine in patients with metastatic, histologically confirmed melanoma was investigated in a phase I dose-escalation study and the activity of the combination was explored in an open-label phase II study.

Results:

In the phase I study, three patients were treated with sorafenib 200 mg twice daily (b.i.d.) plus 1000 mg m⁻² dacarbazine on day 1 of a 21-day cycle and 15 patients had the sorafenib dose escalated to 400 mg b.i.d. without reaching the maximum tolerated dose of the combination. In the phase II study (n=83), the overall response rate was 12% (95% CI: 6, 21): one complete and nine partial, with median response duration of 46.7 weeks. Stable disease was the best response in 37% median duration was 13.3 weeks. Median overall survival (OS) was 37.0 weeks (95% CI: 33.9, 46.0).

Conclusion:

Oral sorafenib combined with dacarbazine had acceptable toxicity and some antineoplastic activity against metastatic melanoma.     

Population pharmacokinetics in phase I drug development: a phase I study of PK1 in patients with solid tumours

Doxorubicin pharmacokinetics were determined in 33 patients with solid tumours who received intravenous doses of 20–320 mg m⁻² HPMA copolymer bound doxorubicin (PK1) in a phase I study. Since assay constraints limited the data at lower doses, conventional analysis was not feasible and a ‘population approach’ was used. Bound concentrations were best described by a biexponential model and further analyses revealed a small influence of dose or weight on V1 but no identifiable effects of age, body surface area, renal or hepatic function. The final model was: clearance (Q) 0.194 l h⁻¹; central compartment volume (V1) 4.48 × (1+0.00074 × dose (mg)) l; peripheral compartment volume (V2) 7.94 l; intercompartmental clearance 0.685 l h⁻¹. Distribution and elimination half-lives had median estimates of 2.7 h and 49 h respectively. Free doxorubicin was present at most sampling times with concentrations around 1000 times lower than bound doxorubicin values. Data were best described using a biexponential model and the following parameters were estimated: apparent clearance 180 l h⁻¹; apparent V1 (l) 1450 × (1+0.0013 × dose (mg)), apparent V2 (l) 21 300 × (1–0.0013 × dose (mg)) × (1+2.95 × height (m)) and apparent Q 6950 l h⁻¹. Distribution and elimination half-lives were 0.13 h and 85 h respectively. © 1999 Cancer Research Campaign     

Population pharmacokinetics of docetaxel during phase I studies using nonlinear mixed-effect modeling and nonparametric maximum-likelihood estimation

Docetaxel, a novel anticancer agent, was given to 26 patients by short i.v. infusion (1–2 h) at various dose levels (70–115 mg/m², the maximum tolerated dose) during 2 phase I studies. Two population analyses, one using NONMEM (nonlinear mixed-effect modeling) and the other using NPML (nonparametric maximum-likelihood), were performed sequentially to determine the structural model; estimate the mean population parameters, including clearance (Cl) and interindividual variability; and find influences of demographic covariates on them. Nine covariates were included in the analyses: age, height, weight, body surface area, sex, performance status, presence of liver metastasis, dose level, and type of formulation. A three-compartment model gave the best fit to the data, and the final NONMEM regression model for Cl wasCl=BSA(1+2×AGE), expressing Cl (in liters per hour) directly as a function of body surface area. Only these two covariates were considered in the NPML analysis to confirm the results found by NONMEM. Using NONMEM [for a patient with mean AGE (52.3 years) and mean BSA (1.68 m²)] and NPML, docetaxel Cl was estimated to be 35.6 l/h (21.2 lh^–1 m^–2) and 37.2 l/h with interpatient coefficients of variation (CVs) of 17.4% and 24.8%, respectively. The intraindividual CV was estimated at 23.8% by NONMEM; the corresponding variability was fixed in NPML in an additive Gaussian variance error model with a 20% CV. Discrepancies were found in the mean volume at steady state (Vss; 83.2 l for NPML versus 124 l for NONMEM) and in terminal half-lives, notably the meant _1/2, which was shorter as determined by NPML (7.89 versus 12.2 h), although the interindividual CV was 89.1% and 62.7% for Vss andt _1/2, respectively. However, the NPML-estimated probability density function (pdf) oft _1/2, was bimodal (5 and 11.4 h), probably due to the imbalance of the data. Both analyses suggest a similar magnitude of mean Cl decrease with small BSA and advanced age.     

Benznidazole with CCNU: a clinical phase I toxicity study

It has been shown in a variety of model systems that benznidazole (BENZO) is capable of enhancing the cytotoxicity of a number of drugs, including nitrosoureas. We report an escalating dose toxicity study of the combination of BENZO and CCNU on 34 patients in whom the usual clinical dose of CCNU (130 mg/m2) was given together with escalating doses of BENZO (up to a maximum dose of 40 mg/kg). We have observed no BENZO-related toxicity and no evidence that, in the dose range studied, BENZO enhances the gastrointestinal or hematological toxicity of CCNU. It is possible to administer the usual dose of CCNU together with doses of BENZO that can be shown to have a clear effect on the pharmacokinetics of CCNU and which might be expected, from the results of animal experiments, to produce enhancement of its cytotoxicity. A Phase III study of the combination is in progress.     

Population pharmacokinetics of the novel anticancer agent E7070 during four phase I studies: model building and validation.

PURPOSE: N-(3-Chloro-7-indolyl)-1,4-benzenedisulfonamide (E7070) is a novel sulfonamide anticancer agent currently in phase II clinical development for the treatment of solid tumors. Four phase I studies have been finalized, with E7070 administered at four different treatment schedules to identify the maximum-tolerated dose and the dose-limiting toxicities. Pharmacokinetic analyses of all studies revealed E7070 to have nonlinear pharmacokinetics. A population pharmacokinetic model was designed and validated to describe the pharmacokinetics of E7070 at all four treatment schedules and to identify the possible influences of patient characteristics on the pharmacokinetic parameters. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Plasma concentration-time data of all patients (n = 143) were fitted to several pharmacokinetic models using NONMEM. Seventeen covariables were investigated for their relation with individual pharmacokinetic parameters. A bootstrap procedure was performed to check the validity of the model. RESULTS: The data were best described using a three-compartment model with nonlinear distribution to a peripheral compartment and two parallel pathways of elimination from the central compartment: a linear and a saturable pathway. Body-surface area (BSA) was significantly correlated to both the volume of distribution of the central compartment and to the maximal elimination capacity. The fits of 500 bootstrap replicates of the data set demonstrated the robustness of the developed population pharmacokinetic model. CONCLUSION: A population pharmacokinetic model has been designed and validated that accurately describes the data of four phase I studies with E7070. Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that BSA-guided dosing for E7070 is important.     

Experimental designs for phase I and phase I/II dose-finding studies

We review the rationale behind the statistical design of dose-finding studies as used in phase I and phase I/II clinical trials. We underline what the objectives of such dose-finding studies should be and why the widely used standard design fails to meet any of these objectives. The standard design is a "memoryless" design and we discuss how this impacts on practical behaviour. Designs introduced over the last two decades can be viewed as designs with memory and we discuss how these designs are superior to memoryless designs. By superior we mean that they require less patients overall, less patients to attain the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and concentrate a higher percentage of patients at and near to the MTD. We reanalyse some recently published studies in order to provide support to our contention that markedly better results could have been achieved had a design with memory been used instead of a memoryless design.     

A phase I and pharmacokinetics study of prolonged ambulatory-infusion carboplatin

A total of 18 patients received 6-week ambulatory infusions of carboplatin in groups at dose levels of 14, 28, 35 and 42 mg/m² per day. The dose-limiting toxicity was myelosuppression. At 42 mg/m², three of four patients had WHO grade 4 and one of four had grade 3 neutropenia, whereas two patients had grade 3 thrombocytopenia. At 35 mg/m², two of five patients had grade 3 neutropenia, whereas one had grade 4 and two had grade 3 thrombocytopenia. Non-hematological toxicities were predominantly gastrointestinal, with 3 of 18 patients experiencing grade 3 emesis. Total and ultrafiltrable platinum (UFPt) were assayed by flameless atomic absorption spectrometry in weekly and post-infusion plasma and urine samples. In plasma, levels of total platinum increased throughout the infusion, and the protein binding slowly increased from 60% platinum bound at week 1 to 90% bound by week 4. Although the UFPt level reached a steady state within 1 week, the concentration did not increase with the dose level, remaining at a mean value of 0.58±0.24 M. Renal excretion of platinum accounted for 70±12% of the dose at steady state. There was a high inter-patient variability in both total body clearance of UFPt (range, 83–603 ml/min) and renal clearance (range, 67–390 ml/min). A terminal elemination half-life of 13–27 h was noted for post-infusion UFPt. Neutropenia was linearly related to the total daily carboplatin dose, but neither neutropenia nor thrombocytopenia could be related to steady-state UFPt or the UFPt area under the concentration-time curve (AUC). The recommended dose for phase II studies is 28 mg/m² per day.     

Safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of amuvatinib from three phase 1 clinical studies in healthy volunteers

Purpose

Amuvatinib is a multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor with activity that also disrupts DNA damage repair through suppression of homologous recombination protein Rad51. Amuvatinib dry-powder capsules (DPC) showed evidence of activity in early Phase 1 cancer studies but low systemic exposure. The purposes of the studies were to investigate the cause of low exposure, develop, and test an alternative formulation with improved exposure, and establish the dose to be tested in future studies in cancer patients.

Methods

Three studies were conducted in a total of 58 healthy subjects: a food-effect study using amuvatinib DPC, a single-dose pharmacokinetic study comparing amuvatinib DPC to a new lipid-suspension capsules (LSC), and a multiple-dose pharmacokinetic study using amuvatinib LSC.

Results

A high-fat meal administered with amuvatinib DPC increased the rate and extent of absorption compared to the Fasted state, a 183 and 118% increase in the mean C _max and AUC_0–∞ of amuvatinib, respectively. The single-dose pharmacokinetics of amuvatinib LSC resulted in an approximately two-third-fold increased exposure (AUC) compared with amuvatinib DPC. The multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of the amuvatinib LSC 300 mg administered every 8 h exhibited improved accumulation compared with the 12-h regimens and achieved presumed therapeutic level safely with no serious or severe adverse events reported. No subject discontinued treatment due to an adverse event.

Conclusion

Amuvatinib LSC, 300 mg every 8 h, is being studied in cancer patients based on the improved exposure and similar safety profile to amuvatinib DPC. A lipid-based formulation approach may be a useful tool for other low aqueous soluble compounds.