Late rectal function after prostate brachytherapy

PURPOSE: Using a patient-administered quality of life instrument, to evaluate the effect of permanent prostate brachytherapy on late rectal function. METHODS AND MATERIALS: One hundred eighty-nine prostate brachytherapy patients were mailed the Rectal Function Assessment Score (R-FAS), with a prestamped return envelope. The R-FAS consists of nine questions and a scoring range of 0-27, with higher scores indicative of poorer bowel function. One hundred eighty-seven (98.4%) surveys were returned. The median follow-up was 66.3 months (range 54-92 months). Clinical, treatment, and dosimetric parameters evaluated for bowel dysfunction included patient age, diabetes, hypertension, tobacco consumption, clinical T-stage, elapsed time since implant, prostate ultrasound volume, planning target volume, hormonal status, supplemental external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), isotope, average, median and maximum rectal doses, total implanted seed strength, values of the minimum dose received by 90% of the prostate gland (D(90)), and the percent prostate volume receiving 100%, 150%, and 200% of the minimum prescribed dose (V(100/150/200)). RESULTS: The R-FAS score for the evaluated cohort was 3.92, which represented a slight improvement from the 1999 survey score of 4.15 (p = 0.29). Of the evaluated clinical, treatment, and dosimetric parameters, the number of preimplant bowel movements, a history of tobacco consumption, and the median rectal dose correlated with the R-FAS. Although lower rectal doses were noted with Pd-103, isotope did not predict for bowel function. Only 12% (23/187) of patients reported their bowel function to be worse after implantation. Patient perception of overall rectal quality of life was inversely related to the use of supplemental EBRT (p = 0.007). CONCLUSION: Minor bowel changes are noted following prostate brachytherapy. The vast majority of patients did not report any deterioration in bowel function. In addition, the R-FAS continue to improve with time.     

Influence of hormonal therapy on late rectal function after permanent prostate brachytherapy with or without supplemental external beam radiotherapy

PURPOSE: Recent clinical studies have reported a relationship between the use of hormonal therapy and degradation in rectal function after external beam radiotherapy. Using a patient-administered quality-of-life instrument, we evaluated the effect of hormonal therapy on late rectal function after permanent prostate brachytherapy with or without supplemental external beam radiotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 189 patients were mailed the Rectal Function Assessment Score (R-FAS), which consists of nine questions (score range 0-27, with higher scores indicative of poorer bowel function). Of the 189 surveys sent out, 187 (98.4%) were returned. Of the 187 patients, 149 (79.7%) were hormone naive, and 38 (20.3%) had received hormonal manipulation (median duration 4 months, range 3-36). The median follow-up for the entire group was 66.3 months. The effect of hormonal therapy on bowel function was evaluated by comparing the R-FAS scores across time, by each of the individual nine questions, and by means of a summary question evaluating the patient's perception of overall bowel function. The two groups were also evaluated in terms of clinical, treatment, and dosimetric parameters, including follow-up, age, Gleason score, clinical stage, pretreatment prostate-specific antigen level, number of pretreatment bowel movements/d, prostate volume, and rectal dosimetry. RESULTS: The two groups were well matched in all clinical, treatment, and dosimetric parameters, except the patients receiving hormonal therapy had a statistically shorter follow-up (63.9 vs. 69.4 months, p <0.001) and higher pretreatment prostate-specific antigen level (12.0 vs. 9.8 ng/mL, p = 0.024). The R-FAS scores for the hormone-naive and hormonally manipulated patients were comparable (3.76 vs. 4.55, p = 0.083). In terms of the nine individual R-FAS questions, no statistically significant difference was reported for any question when stratified by hormonal status, including rectal bleeding (p = 0.735). Only 12% and 13% of hormone-naive and hormonally manipulated patients, respectively, reported bowel function to be worse after implantation. With time, a trend for improvement in the R-FAS was noted in both cohorts. CONCLUSION: After permanent prostate brachytherapy, no statistically significant difference in bowel habits was discerned when stratified by hormonal status. In addition, only 12% of brachytherapy patients reported deterioration in bowel function after implantation.     

A comparison of radiation dose to the neurovascular bundles in men with and without prostate brachytherapy-induced erectile dysfunction

PURPOSE: The etiology of erectile dysfunction after definitive local therapy for carcinoma of the prostate gland represents a multifactorial phenomenon including neurogenic compromise, venous insufficiency, local trauma, and psychogenic causes. It has been suggested that impotence after prostate brachytherapy is a consequence of excessive radiation dose to the neurovascular bundles (NVB). Herein we evaluate the potential relationship between radiation dose to the NVB and the development of erectile dysfunction following prostate brachytherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The radiation dose to the NVB was evaluated for 33 patients who developed erectile dysfunction (ED) following brachytherapy plus 21 additional patients who were potent before and subsequent to brachytherapy. Of the 54 patient study group, the median follow up was 37 months, and 25 patients were managed with (125)I as a monotherapeutic approach and 29 received (103)Pd as a boost following 45 Gy of external beam radiation therapy. Radiographic localization of the NVB was performed via a two-dimensional geometric model that placed 3-NVB calculation points on the left and right posterolateral side of each 5-mm CT slice. Parameters evaluated included dose-surface histograms, dose parameters via point doses on each slice, the magnitude of the dose in relationship to the distance from the base, and the relationship between NVB radiation dose in patients with and without ED, patient response to sildenafil and case sequence number. RESULTS: In terms of percent prescribed minimum peripheral dose (% mPD), there was no significant difference in mean neurovascular bundle dose between potent and impotent patients, between the isotopes ((125)I or (103)Pd), mono- or boost therapy, or side of the prostate for which the overall average was 217% +/- 55% of mPD. There was also no significant dosimetric difference in terms of response to sildenafil based on a multivariate analysis which included % mPD and various dose thresholds and side of the gland. The dose distribution over the length of the prostate rose smoothly from the base and apex to peak at midgland in (125)I implants while (103)Pd implants had a relatively constant dose over the length of the prostate. Considering the calculation grid as forming a 6-mm wide ribbon along each side of the prostate, the average patient had 70 mm(2) area receiving at least 300% of mPD. CONCLUSION: In this study, no relationship between radiation dose to the NVB and the development of post brachytherapy erectile dysfunction was discernible. Such a difference may become evident with additional follow-up. If long-term brachytherapy-induced erectile dysfunction is related to the radiation dose to the NVB, the ultimate preservation of potency following prostate brachytherapy may be markedly inferior to what has been reported. Nevertheless, the majority of this patient population responded favorably to sildenafil.     

^125I对比^103Pd治疗低危前列腺癌的系统评价

背景与目的：粒子植入近距离放射治疗是早期前列腺癌的主要治疗手段．常用核素粒子为^125I或^103Pd,二者在前列腺癌治疗的并发症和结果方面存有差异。本文用系统评价的方法分析^125I或^103Pd近距离放射治疗低危前列腺癌的疗效和副作用,为临床决策提供指导性依据。方法：采用文献检索和手工检索的方式搜集2008年5月以前有关^125I或^103Pd治疗低危前列腺癌的随机对照试验的文献资料,根据Cochrane Handbook4．2．6质量评价标准进行评价,由两位研究者交叉核对纳入试验的结果,用RevMan5．0进行统计学分析。结果：共纳入6个随机对照研究．1406例患者。^125I或^103Pd治疗低危前列腺癌生物学无进展生存率差异没有统计学意义（RR=0．97,95％CI=0．93～1．01）;治疗后1个月^103Pd组副作用较^125I组明显,治疗后6个月^125I组副作用较^103Pd明显,治疗后12个月两种核素副作用无差别。结论：使用^125I或^103Pd治疗低危前列腺癌疗效相似,副作用在治疗后不同时间点有差异。     

Is there a role for postimplant dosimetry after real-time dynamic permanent prostate brachytherapy?

PURPOSE: To evaluate the correlation of real-time dynamic prostate brachytherapy (RTDPB) dosimetry and traditional postimplant dosimetry for permanent prostate brachytherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 164 patients underwent RTDPB for clinically confined prostate cancer. Of these 164 patients, 45 were implanted with 103Pd and 119 with 125I. Additionally, 44 patients underwent combined external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy and 120 patients underwent brachytherapy alone. The postimplant dosimetry with computed tomography was performed at 4 weeks and compared with the RTDPB dose plan using the intraclass correlation coefficient. The millicurie/gram of the prostate volume and the percentage of the minimal dose to 90% of the prostate relative to the prescribed implant dose (D90%) of the RTDPB patients was compared with 400 patients treated with a free-seed technique. RESULTS: The mean D90% achieved in the operating room and on the 3-week dose plan was 109% (range, 93-139%) and 105% (range, 88-140), respectively. The mean percentage of prostate volume receiving 100% of the prescribed minimal peripheral dose (V100) achieved in the operating room and on the 3-week dose plan was 93% (range, 78-98%) and 91% (range, 64-98%), respectively. The intraclass correlation coefficient for each calculated relationship was 0.586 for D90 (p<0.001), 1.19 for V100 (p=0.135), 0.692 for the urethral D90 (p<0.001), 0.602 for the maximal rectal dose (p<0.001), 0.546 for D90 with 125I (p<0.001), and 0.565 for D90 with 103Pd (p<0.001). A 12% decrease was noted in the millicurie/gram of the isotope, with a 2.5% increase in the D90 comparing RTDPB and the free-seed technique. CONCLUSION: The results of this study demonstrated a correlation between the dose assessment obtained intraoperatively and postoperatively at 3 weeks. With reliable dose data available in the operating room, our results question the need for routine postimplant dose studies. Furthermore, patients treated with RTDPB received less radioactivity per gram of the prostate with a corresponding small increase in the D90. Future analyses will assess variations in the inverse dose planning rules and the clinical correlation of patients undergoing RTDPB vs. older techniques for toxicity and biochemical outcomes.     

Potential role of various dosimetric quality indicators in prostate brachytherapy.

PURPOSE: Postoperative CT-based dosimetric analysis provides detailed information regarding the coverage and uniformity of an implant, but the assessment of implant quality remains an unanswered and controversial issue. There is no disagreement that a good implant should cover the target volume with an adequate dose, but there is no consensus as to what represents an adequate dose. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The American Brachytherapy Society has recently proposed that prostate brachytherapy quality be measured in terms of the following parameters: D90, V100, and V150 where D90 is defined as the minimal dose covering 90% of the prostate volume and V100 and V150 are defined as the percent volume of the prostate receiving at least 100% or 150% of the prescribed minimal peripheral dose (mPD), respectively. We report detailed day 0 dosimetric evaluation for 60 consecutive prostate brachytherapy patients implanted via a standard transperineal ultrasound guided approach in terms of D90, D100, V90, V100, and V150 and also the maximal and average rectal and urethral dose. RESULTS: Dosimetric evaluation resulted in a V100 greater than 80% of the prostate volume and a D90 greater than 90% of the mPD in the entire patient population. There was a statistically significant difference between the quality scores of 125I implants and 103Pd implants with the 125I mean V100 and D90 at 95.3% volume and 109.9% mPD, respectively, vs. 103Pd at 91.8% volume and 103.7% mPD. Likewise, the rectal and urethral doses as a fraction of mPD were significantly lower in 103Pd than in 125I implants. This occurred despite the fact that palladium implants were typically preplanned with significantly better coverage and hotter V150 than iodine implants. We consider V150 to be an important parameter for determining dose homogeneity although the clinical utility of dose homogeneity remains unknown. The mean V150 was 45.6 +/- 9.6% volume. There was no additional dosimetric utility from a determination of V90 while D100 was found to be overly sensitive to steep dose gradients at the periphery of the prostate. CONCLUSIONS: This report represents the first detailed postimplant day 0 dosimetric evaluation comparing ABS recommended quality parameters used to evaluate prostate brachytherapy. At the present time, no long-term clinical outcomes are available because of short follow-up. As PSA based follow-up data becomes available, however, this report may help define what represents an adequate implant.     

Five-year biochemical outcome following permanent interstitial brachytherapy for clinical T1-T3 prostate cancer

PURPOSE: To evaluate 5-year biochemical disease-free outcome for men with clinical T1b-T3a NxM0 1977 American Joint Committee on Cancer (1997 AJCC) adenocarcinoma of the prostate gland who underwent transperineal ultrasound-guided permanent prostate brachytherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Four hundred twenty-five patients underwent transperineal ultrasound-guided prostate brachytherapy using either 103Pd or 125I, for clinical T1b-T3a NxM0 (1997 AJCC) adenocarcinoma of the prostate gland, from April 1995 to October 1999. No patient underwent pathologic lymph-node staging. One hundred ninety patients were implanted with either 103Pd or 125I monotherapy; 235 patients received moderate-dose external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), followed by a prostate brachytherapy boost; 163 patients received neoadjuvant hormonal manipulation, in conjunction with either 103Pd or 125I monotherapy (77 patients) or in conjunction with moderate-dose EBRT and a prostate brachytherapy boost (86 patients). The median patient age was 68.0 years (range, 48.2-81.3 years). The median follow-up was 31 months (range, 11-69 months). Follow-up was calculated from the day of implantation. No patient was lost to follow-up. Biochemical disease-free survival was defined by the American Society of Therapeutic Radiation and Oncology (ASTRO) consensus definition. RESULTS: For the entire cohort, the 5-year actuarial biochemical no evidence of disease (bNED) survival rate was 94%. For patients with low-, intermediate-, and high-risk disease, the 5-year biochemical disease-free rates were 97.1%, 97.5%, and 84.4%, respectively. For hormone-naive patients, 95.7%, 96.4%, and 79.9% of patients with low-, intermediate-, and high-risk disease were free of biochemical failure. Clinical and treatment parameters predictive of biochemical outcome included: clinical stage, pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA), Gleason score, risk group, age > 65 years, and neoadjuvant hormonal therapy. Isotope choice was not a statistically significant predictor of disease-free survival for any risk group. The median postimplant PSA was < or = 0.2 for all risk groups, regardless of hormonal status. The mean posttreatment PSA, however, was significantly lower for men implanted with 103Pd (0.14 ng/mL) than for those implanted with 125I (0.25 ng/mL), p < or = 0.001. CONCLUSION: With a median follow-up of 31 months, permanent prostate brachytherapy results in a high probability of actuarial 5-year biochemical disease-free survival (DFS) for patients with clinical T1b-T3a (1997 AJCC) adenocarcinoma of the prostate gland, with an apparent plateau on the PSA survival curve.     

Effect of post-implant edema on the rectal dose in prostate brachytherapy.

PURPOSE: To characterize the effect of prostate edema on the determination of the dose delivered to the rectum following the implantation of 125I or 103Pd seeds into the prostate. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From 3 to 5 post-implant computed tomography (CT) scans were obtained on 9 patients who received either 125I or 103Pd seed implants. None of the patients received hormone therapy. The outer surface of the rectum was outlined on each axial CT image from the base to the apex of the prostate. The D10 rectal surface dose, defined as the dose which encompasses only 10% of the surface area of the rectum, was determined from each CT scan by compiling a dose-surface histogram (DSH) of the rectal surface. The magnitude and half-life of the post-implant edema in each of these implants is known from the results of a previously published study based on the analysis of the serial CT scans. RESULTS: As the prostate edema resolved, the distance between the most posterior implanted seeds and the anterior surface of the rectum decreased. As a result, the D10 rectal surface dose increased with each successive post-implant CT scan until the edema resolved. The dose increased exponentially at approximately the same rate the prostate volume decreased. The D10 rectal surface dose at 30 days post-implant ranged from 16% to 190% (mean 68 +/- 50%) greater than on day 0. The dose on day 30 was at least 50% greater in 6 of 9 cases. CONCLUSION: The rectal surface dose determined by analysis of a post-implant CT scan of an 125I or 103Pd prostate seed implant depends upon the timing of the CT scan. The dose indicated by the CT scan on day 30 is typically at least 50% greater than that indicated by the CT scan on day 0. Because of this difference, it is important to keep the timing of the post-implant CT in mind when specifying dose thresholds for rectal morbidity.     

Low-dose rate prostate brachytherapy is well tolerated in patients with a history of inflammatory bowel disease

PURPOSE: We report on the follow-up of 24 patients with a prior history of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treated with brachytherapy for early-stage prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty-four patients with a history of inflammatory bowel disease (17 with ulcerative colitis (UC), 7 with Crohn's disease [CD]) underwent prostate brachytherapy between 1992 and 2004. Fifteen patients were treated with I-125 implantation and 6 patients were treated with Pd-103 alone or in combination with 45 Gy external beam radiation. Charts were reviewed for all patients, and all living patients were contacted by phone. National Cancer Institute common toxicity scores for proctitis were assigned to all patients. Actuarial risk of late toxicity was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software. Follow-up ranged from 3 to 126 months (median, 48.5 months; mean, 56.8 months). RESULTS: None of the patients experienced Grade 3 or 4 rectal toxicity. Four patients experienced Grade 2 late rectal toxicity. The 5-year actuarial freedom from developing late Grade 2 rectal toxicity was 81%. At a median follow-up of 48.5 months, 23 patients were alive and had no evidence of disease with a median prostate-specific antigen for the sample of 0.1 ng/mL (range, <0.05-0.88 ng/mL). One patient died of other causes unrelated to his prostate cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Prostate brachytherapy is well tolerated in patients with a history of controlled IBD. Therefore, brachytherapy should be considered a viable therapeutic option in this patient population.     

Radiation exposure after permanent prostate brachytherapy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Limited information is available on the true radiation exposure and associated risks for the relatives of the patients submitted to prostate brachytherapy with permanent implant of radioactive sources and for any other people coming into contact with them. In order to provide appropriate information, we analyzed the radiation exposure data from 216 prostate cancer patients who underwent (125)I or (103)Pd implants at the European Institute of Oncology of Milan, Italy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between October 1999 and October 2004, 216 patients with low risk prostate carcinoma were treated with (125)I (200 patients) or (103)Pd (16 patients) permanent seed implantation. One day after the procedure, radiation exposure measurements around the patients were performed using an ionization chamber survey meter (Victoreen RPO-50) calibrated in dose rate at an accredited calibration center (calibration Centre SIT 104). RESULTS: The mean dose rate at the posterior skin surface (gluteal region) following (125)I implants was 41.3 microSv/h (range: 6.2-99.4 microSv/h) and following (103)Pd implants was 18.9 microSv/h (range 5.0-37.3 microSv/h). The dose rate at 50 cm from the skin decreased to the mean value of 6.4 microSv/h for the (125)I implants and to the mean value of 1.7 microSv/h for the (103)Pd implants. Total times required to reach the annual dose limit (1 mSv/year) recommended for the general population by the European Directive 96/29/Euratom and by the Italian law (Decreto Legislativo 241/2000) at a distance of 50 cm from the posterior skin surface of the implanted patient would be 7.7 and 21.6 days for (125)I and for (103)Pd. Good correlation between the measured dose rates and both the total implanted activity and the distance between the most posteriorly implanted seed and the skin surface of the patients was found. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that the dose rates at 50 cm away from the prostate brachytherapy patients are very low and that the doses possibly absorbed by the relatives and other members of the general population coming into contact with the treated patients are well below the dose limit set by the European Directive and by the Italian regulation. However, in order to meet the recommendation of the ALARA principle (As Low As Reasonably/Readily Achievable), some advice to the patients should be given, such as to maintain a minimum distance from the patient of 1m, at least for a period equal to one half life of used radionuclide (60 days for (125)I and 15 days for (103)Pd).     

Intraoperative fluoroscopic dose assessment in prostate brachytherapy patients

PURPOSE: To evaluate a fluoroscopy-based intraoperative dosimetry system to guide placement of additional sources to underdosed areas, and perform computed tomography (CT) verification. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty-six patients with prostate carcinoma treated with either I-125 or Pd-103 brachytherapy at the Puget Sound VA using intraoperative postimplant dosimetry were analyzed. Implants were performed by standard techniques. After completion of the initial planned brachytherapy procedure, the initial fluoroscopic intraoperative dose reconstruction analysis (I-FL) was performed with three fluoroscopic images acquired at 0 (AP), +15, and -15 degrees. Automatic seed identification was performed and the three-dimensional (3D) seed coordinates were computed and imported into VariSeed for dose visualization. Based on a 3D assessment of the isodose patterns additional seeds were implanted, and the final fluoroscopic intraoperative dose reconstruction was performed (FL). A postimplant computed tomography (CT) scan was obtained after the procedure and dosimetric parameters and isodose patterns were analyzed and compared. RESULTS: An average of 4.7 additional seeds were implanted after intraoperative analysis of the dose coverage (I-FL), and a median of 5 seeds. After implantation of additional seeds the mean V100 increased from 89% (I-FL) to 92% (FL) (p < 0.001). In I-125 patients an improvement from 91% to 94% (p = 0.01), and 87% to 93% (p = 0.001) was seen for Pd-103. The D90 increased from 105% (I-FL) to 122% (FL) (p < 0.001) for I-125, and 92% (I-FL) to 102% (FL) (p = 0.008) for Pd-103. A minimal change occurred in the R100 from a mean of 0.32 mL (I-FL) to 0.6 mL (FL) (p = 0.19). No statistical difference was noted in the R100 (rectal volume receiving 100% of the prescribed dose) between the two techniques. The rate of adverse isodose patterns decreased between I-FL and FL from 42% to 8%, respectively. The I-125 patients demonstrated a complete resolution of adverse isodose patterns after the initial isodose reconstruction (I-FL). The Pd-103 patients demonstrated a final rate of 8% gaps, 0% islands, and 0% holes on corrected isodose reconstruction. CONCLUSION: The use of intraoperative fluoroscopy-based dose assessment can accurately guide in the implantation of additional sources to supplement inadequately dosed areas within the prostate gland. Additionally, guided implantation of additional source, can significantly improve V100s and D90s, without significantly increasing rectal doses.     

Effect of transurethral resection on urinary quality of life after permanent prostate brachytherapy

PURPOSE: To determine the effect of transurethral resection on urinary function after permanent prostate brachytherapy using a validated, patient-administered, quality-of-life (QOL) instrument. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty-seven consecutive brachytherapy patients with clinical T1b-T2b (1997 American Joint Commission on Cancer) prostate cancer and a history of either preimplant or postimplant transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) were evaluated. Of the 27 patients, 1 continued to be catheter dependent and was excluded from analysis. Of the remaining 26 patients, each was mailed the urinary function component of the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index (EPIC) and the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS). Twenty-six surveys (100%) were returned. The mean and median follow-up was 44.8 and 39.8 months, respectively. The clinical, treatment, and dosimetric parameters evaluated included age, pretreatment prostate-specific antigen level, Gleason score, stage, risk group, prostate volume, presence of diabetes and hypertension, tobacco consumption, number of TURPs, number of grams resected, ultrasound planning volume, hormonal status, supplemental external beam radiotherapy, isotope, follow-up (in months), minimal dose received by 90% of the prostate gland, percentage of prostate volume receiving 100%, 150%, and 200% of the prescribed minimal peripheral dose, and the average and maximal urethral dose. Because baseline IPSSs, but not EPIC scores, were available, a cross-sectional survey was performed in which 51 newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients yet to receive any therapeutic intervention and 195 non-TURP brachytherapy patients served as controls. RESULTS: For all evaluated parameters, superior urinary scores were noted in the preimplant TURP group, with intermediate scores in the postimplant TURP patients and poor urinary QOL scores in the pre- and postimplant TURP patients. With time, the EPIC scores improved in the pre- and postimplant TURP cohorts. In multivariate linear regression analysis of the EPIC urinary summary score, the number of TURPs and supplemental external beam radiotherapy were the strongest predictors for diminished QOL. CONCLUSION: TURP results in diminished urinary QOL after brachytherapy. However, patients who underwent preimplant TURP had urinary QOL approaching that of non-TURP brachytherapy patients. Significant urinary dysfunction was noted in approximately one-half of patients who underwent postimplant TURP (especially pre- and postimplant TURP). Because most patients with brachytherapy-related urinary obstruction will eventually spontaneously void, TURP should be approached with extreme caution and only after substantial time has transpired.     

Short-term sexual function after prostate brachytherapy

Sexual function was evaluated in 34 patients with low-risk prostate cancer (PSA < or = 10, Gleason score < or = 6, clinical stage T1/T2) undergoing brachytherapy in a phase III prospective randomized trial comparing iodine-125 ((125)I) to palladium-103 ((103)Pd). The mean and median International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) scores for the entire group were 14.2 and 16.5, respectively, and there was no difference between these scores when stratified by isotope. IIEF scores < 6, 6 to 11, and > or = 12 were recorded in 35% (12/34), 6% (2/34), and 59% (20/34) of patients, respectively. Hematospermia, orgasmalgia (pain at the time of orgasm), and alteration in intensity of orgasm were documented in 26% (9/34), 15% (5/34), and 38% (13/34) of patients, respectively, but these side effects were of limited duration for most patients. There was no relationship between radiation dose to the neurovascular bundles (NVB), which averaged 209% of the prescribed prostate dose, and the development of postbrachytherapy impotence. All four impotent patients who used sildenafil responded favorably. With a median follow-up of 13 months, 65% of patients undergoing prostate brachytherapy maintained sexual function without pharmacologic support. Including sildenafil responses, 76.5% of patients sustained erections sufficient for sexual intercourse.     

Seed fixity in the prostate/periprostatic region following brachytherapy

PURPOSE: Although postoperative dosimetric analyses of prostate brachytherapy are commonly reported, the long-term persistence, or fixity, of seeds implanted in the prostate gland and periprostatic region remains unclear, with only a few reports regarding the loss or migration of the seeds in the implanted region and none which correlate lung embolization to pelvic seed loss. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The study population consisted of 175 consecutive patients implanted with either 125I (95 patients) or 103Pd (80 patients) using a mean of 136 seeds in a modified uniform loading approach to cover a planning volume that was 1.64 times the ultrasound prostate volume. An average of 64% of 125I seeds were embedded in braided vicryl suture, and these seeds were used on the periphery and extra prostatic regions. Following CT-based dosimetric analysis on day 0, all patients had orthogonal plain films of the pelvis obtained from day 0 to day 502, with an average of 2.3 film pairs per patient. Routine diagnostic PA and lateral chest X rays were obtained for 156 patients over the same time period. RESULTS: The mean pelvic seed fixity was greater than 98% throughout the time covered by this study. The seed fixity rates for 125I and 103Pd, although nearly equal, were significantly different up to 60 days post implant. The median 125I seed loss per patient was only 1 seed through 180 days while for 103Pd, the median seed loss was 2 seeds at 28 and 60 days and 3 seeds at 180 days. The fraction of patients experiencing no seed loss decreased from 40% at 28 days to 20% at 180 days for 125I and from 24% to 7% for 103Pd over the same time interval. Patient and treatment parameters closely correlated to local seed loss include the number of seeds implanted, the planning volume, and the number of loose seeds, and for 125I, the fraction of seeds in suture. The fraction of seeds placed outside the gland was not correlated with seed loss. Of the seeds lost from the pelvis, about 10% were found to embolize to the lungs. Among the 156 patients with post-implant chest X rays, the fraction of patients with pulmonary seed embolization was 34/156 (21.8%). Of the 20 patients who had post-implant chest X rays obtained within 14 days of brachytherapy, none had seeds detected in the lungs, while of the 136 patients who had chest X rays obtained greater than 30 days following implantation, 25.0% (34 patients) were noted to have seeds visualized in the lungs. CONCLUSIONS: With a median follow-up of 9 months, 125I seeds embedded in a vicryl suture or 103Pd seeds can be safely implanted in the prostate and periprostatic tissue with a high probability of prostate bed seed fixity and a low incidence of radioactive seed embolization to the lungs.