Prolonged use of tenofovir in HIV/hepatitis B virus (HBV)-coinfected individuals does not lead to HBV polymerase mutations and is associated with persistence of lamivudine HBV polymerase mutations

Objectives

The aim of the study was to identify and characterize hepatitis B virus (HBV) polymerase gene mutations associated with ongoing HBV replication in HIV/HBV‐coinfected individuals receiving tenofovir (TDF).

Methods

This retrospective cross‐sectional study identified 28 HIV/HBV‐coinfected individuals who had received TDF for at least 3 months. All patients had samples available while receiving TDF (on‐TDF), and 24 also had samples available prior to treatment (pre‐TDF). Case records were reviewed to obtain clinical and virological data at the times of sampling (±3 months). The HBV DNA of all samples was amplified using polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and the polymerase region of PCR‐positive samples was sequenced and compared with reference HBV data.

Results

Of the pre‐TDF samples, 15 of 24 (63%) were HBV PCR positive. Of the on‐TDF samples, four of 28 (14%) were HBV PCR positive (mean time on TDF 13.5 months; range 3–23 months). Lamivudine (3TC)‐resistance mutations were detected in three of four (75%) of these viraemic samples. The previously identified putative TDF‐resistance mutations, rtA194T+rtL180M+rtM204V, were not detected in any individual.

Conclusions

Unique mutations in the HBV polymerase gene associated with TDF resistance are rare in HIV/HBV coinfection. 3TC‐resistance mutations persist and a significant proportion of patients are HBV PCR positive despite the addition of TDF.     

Efficacy of combined antiviral therapy with lamivudine and tenofovir in a liver transplanted girl with de novo hepatitis B virus infection

The management of de novo hepatitis B (HBV) infection in children after liver transplantation is not well defined. Because this infection may induce severe liver disease in the graft liver, an efficient antiviral therapy is desirable. Here, we describe the favorable viral outcome observed in a liver transplanted girl with de novo HBV infection following combination therapy with lamivudine and tenofovir.     

Liver enzyme elevation after lamivudine withdrawal in HIV–hepatitis B virus co-infected patients: the Swiss HIV Cohort Study

Background The principal causes of liver enzyme elevation among HIV-hepatitis B virus (HBV) co-infected patients are the hepatotoxic effects of antiretroviral therapy (ART), alcohol abuse, ART-induced immune reconstitution and the exacerbation of chronic HBV infection. Objectives To investigate the incidence and severity of liver enzyme elevation, liver failure and death following lamivudine (3TC) withdrawal in HIV-HBV co-infected patients. Methods Retrospective analysis of the Swiss HIV Cohort Study database to assess the clinical and biological consequences of the discontinuation of 3TC. Variables considered for analysis included liver enzyme, HIV virological and immunological parameters, and medication prescribed during a 6-month period following 3TC withdrawal. Results 3TC was discontinued in 255 patients on 363 occasions. On 147 occasions (109 patients), a follow-up visit within 6 months following 3TC withdrawal was recorded. Among these patients, liver enzyme elevation occurred on 42 occasions (29%), three of them (2%) with severity grade III and five of them (3.4%) with severity grade IV elevations (as defined by the AIDS Clinical Trials Group). Three patients presented with fulminant hepatitis. One death (0.7%) was recorded. Conclusions HBV reactivation leading to liver dysfunction may be an under-reported consequence of 3TC withdrawal in HIV-HBV co-infected patients. Regular monitoring of HBV markers is warranted if active therapy against HBV is discontinued.     

Switching patients with lamivudine resistant chronic hepatitis B virus from tenofovir to adefovir results in less potent HBV-DNA suppression

The nucleotide analogues, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and adefovir dipivoxil, inhibit viral replication and are both effective against the hepatitis B virus (HBV). In our department, tenofovir was prescribed in addition to lamivudine for the treatment of lamivudine resistant chronic hepatitis B. After registration of adefovir, 10 patients were switched to adefovir monotherapy. We studied changes in HBV-DNA and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) in these patients. The median treatment duration with tenofovir was 78 weeks resulting in a median viral load reduction of 5.4 (range 6.8-2.3) log(10) copies/mL compared to baseline (P = 0.005). Two patients had an increase >1 log(10) copies/mL during tenofovir treatment. After the switch to adefovir, six out of 10 patients had an HBV-DNA >4 log(10) copies/mL and the median HBV-DNA increased from 2.8 to 4.5 log(10) copies/mL (P = 0.017). The factors associated with relapse were HBV-DNA PCR positivity at the time of switch and genotype B or D. ALT levels at the beginning of tenofovir treatment also might be a factor. Retreatment with tenofovir (n = 3) resulted in a rapid decline in HBV-DNA. Tenofovir is a potent antiviral drug. Switching to adefovir resulted in viral relapse in 60% of patients and retreatment with tenofovir resulted again in viral decline, which suggests that tenofovir is a more potent antiviral agent.     

HBV/HIV coinfection is associated with poorer outcomes in hospitalized patients with HBV or HIV

We examined the impact of HBV/HIV coinfection on outcomes in hospitalized patients compared to those with HBV or HIV monoinfection. Using the 2011 US Nationwide Inpatient Sample, we identified patients who had been hospitalized with HBV or HIV monoinfection or HBV/HIV coinfection using ICD‐9‐CM codes. We compared liver‐related admissions between the three groups. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify independent predictors of in‐hospital mortality, length of stay and total charges. A total of 72 584 discharges with HBV monoinfection, 133 880 discharges with HIV monoinfection and 8156 discharges with HBV/HIV coinfection were included. HBV/HIV coinfection was associated with higher mortality compared to HBV monoinfection (OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.30–2.15) but not when compared to HIV monoinfection (OR 1.22, 95% CI 0.96–1.54). However, the presence of HBV along with cirrhosis or complications of portal hypertension was associated with three times greater in‐hospital mortality in patients with HIV compared to those without these complications (OR 3.00, 95% CI 1.80–5.02). Length of stay and total hospitalization charges were greater in the HBV‐/HIV‐coinfected group compared to the HBV monoinfection group (+1.53 days, P < 0.001; $17595, P < 0.001) and the HIV monoinfection group (+0.62 days, P = 0.034; $8840, P = 0.005). In conclusion, HBV/HIV coinfection is a risk factor for in‐hospital mortality, particularly in liver‐related admissions, compared to HBV monoinfection. Overall healthcare utilization from HBV/HIV coinfection is also higher than for either infection alone and higher than the national average for all hospitalizations, thus emphasizing the healthcare burden from these illnesses.     

Hepatitis B virus-specific T cell response in chronic hepatitis B patients treated with lamivudine and interferon-alpha.

AIMS: The goal of the present study was to assess the impact combination antiviral therapy has on immune responses in chronic hepatitis B. MATERIALS AND METHODS: T cell responses were studied in 16 chronically hepatitis B virus (HBV)-infected patients treated with sequential, partially overlapping, lamivudine-interferon (IFN)-alpha combination therapy. RESULTS: HBcAg-specific lymphoproliferative response (LPR) was transiently detected in four of five patients who achieved virus suppression (HBV DNA < 10(4) genome equivalents/ml) at end of dual therapy, and then reverted to pre-treatment viral load after therapy discontinuation. In contrast, no significant HBcAg-specific LPR was detected in 8 patients who did not attain profound HBV suppression, as well as in three patients who experienced no HBV DNA rebound after therapy discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study suggests that restored viral replication after pharmacological suppression drives the immune response to HBV in chronically infected patients. Further characterization of the adaptive immunity and its regulatory mechanisms at time of therapy discontinuation appears therefore necessary in controlled trials.     

HBV lamivudine resistance among hepatitis B and HIV coinfected patients starting lamivudine, stavudine and nevirapine in Kenya

Widespread use of lamivudine in antiretroviral therapy may lead to hepatitis B virus resistance in HIV-HBV coinfected patients from endemic settings where tenofovir is not readily available. We evaluated 389 Kenyan HIV-infected adults before and for 18 months after starting highly active antiretroviral therapy with stavudine, lamivudine and nevirapine. Twenty-seven (6.9%) were HBsAg positive and anti-HBs negative, 24 were HBeAg negative, and 18 had HBV DNA levels ≤ 10,000 IU/mL. Sustained HBV suppression to <100 IU/mL occurred in 89% of 19 evaluable patients. Resistance occurred in only two subjects, both with high baseline HBV DNA levels. Lamivudine resistance can emerge in the setting of incomplete HBV suppression but was infrequently observed among HIV-HBV coinfected patients with low baseline HBV DNA levels.     

Efficacy of lamivudine treatment in Japanese patients with hepatitis B virus-related cirrhosis

Background Several clinical trials have suggested that lamivudine therapy is effective in patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related cirrhosis. However, there are few studies of lamivudine therapy in Japanese patients with HBV cirrhosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of lamivudine therapy in Japanese patients with cirrhosis, and to evaluate the clinical course after the emergence of YMDD mutants.Methods Fifty-four consecutive adult Japanese patients with HBV-related cirrhosis were enrolled and continuously treated with lamivudine, daily for 6–35 months (median, 25 months). Twelve of the 54 patients were hepatitis B envelope antigen (HBeAg)-positive. The clinical courses of 21 of the patients were evaluated using the Child-Pugh-Turcott (CPT) score.Results Lamivudine suppressed serum HBV-DNA to undetectable levels (<3.7 LGE/ml) in 77.8% of patients at 12 months and in 61.3% at 24 months. Before the emergence of YMDD mutants, clinical improvement, defined as a decrease in the CPT score of 2 points or more, was apparent in 6 of 21 (29%) patients. No change in CPT score was evident in 14 of 21 patients (67%). YMDD mutants emerged in 19 of 54 (35%) patients. The cumulative emergence rates increased each year. The emergence rate of YMDD mutants in patients with HBV cirrhosis was higher than that in patients with chronic hepatitis. After the emergence of YMDD mutants, 3 of 12 (25%) patients with YMDD mutants showed CPT score increases of 2 points or more.Conclusions Lamivudine therapy improved the clinical course in some cirrhotic patients. However, in patients with Childs B and C cirrhosis, the emergence of YMDD mutants sometimes led to deterioration of liver function.     

Efficacy of lamivudine therapy in elderly patients with chronic hepatitis B infection

Background The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of lamivudine therapy in elderly patients with chronic HBV infection. Methods Patients aged ≥60 years (n = 40) received lamivudine monotherapy between February 1995 and September 2005 at Toranomon Hospital. We compared the efficacy of lamivudine therapy in these patients and in 639 patients aged <60 years, including 80 patients aged <60 years matched for sex, hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) status, and hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA level. Results The rates of normalization of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level in 40 patients aged ≥60 years and 639 patients aged <60 years were 85% versus 76%, and 86% versus 73% at 1 and 3 years, respectively. The respective rates of loss of HBV-DNA were 74% versus 74%, and 76% versus 68% at 1 and 3 years. The respective cumulative emergence rates of the YMDD mutant were 16% and 17% at 1 year, and 46% and 49% at 3 years. In 80 patients <60 years old matched for sex, HBeAg status, and HBV-DNA level, the rates of normalization of the ALT level and loss of HBV-DNA were similar to those in the 639 patients aged <60 years. The emergence rate of YMDD mutants in patients aged ≥60 years were similar to those in matched patients aged <60 years. Multivariate analyses identified low serum bilirubin (<1 mg/dl) as an independent factor associated with the emergence of the YMDD motif mutation in patients aged ≥60 years. Conclusions Our results suggest that treatment with lamivudine is both well tolerated and efficacious in elderly patients with chronic HBV infection.     

替比夫定与拉米夫定对慢性乙型肝炎患者血清抗原蛋白影响的对照研究

目的:观察和比较替比夫定、拉米夫定对慢性乙型肝炎患者的疗效以及对血清乙肝抗原蛋白水平的影响。方法:采用1∶1随机、对照设计。共入组慢性乙型肝炎患者100例,随机分为替比夫定组50例,拉米夫定组50例;对照观察两组临床疗效及不良反应;并动态监测患者血清HBsAg、HBeAg水平的变化。结果:治疗1年时,替比夫定组患者血清HBV DNA PCR法检测不到的比率、ALT复常率均较拉米夫定组稍高,但无统计学意义;HBeAg阴转率及血清学转化率以及病毒突破率分别为34%、28%和8%,均优于拉米夫定组的16%、12%和22%,差异均有显著性意义(P分别为0.0377、0.0455和0.0498)。两组患者治疗后血清抗原蛋白HBsAg及HBeAg水平均有不同程度的下降,但替比夫定组患者治疗1个月时,血清HBsAg和HBeAg水平较基线下降分别为(30.2±16.1)S/N和(80.8±12.9)S/CO,均高于拉米夫定组的(7.8±12.4)S/N和(10.9±27.9)S/CO,差异有统计学意义;至治疗12个月时,其降幅差异更为明显,分别达到(146.7±32.5)S/N和(202.3±62.8)S/CO及(68.4±39.5)S/N和(90.4±52.8)S/CO,差异有非常显著的统计学意义;替比夫定不良反应轻微,与拉米夫定类似。结论:替比夫定较拉米夫定具有更强地抑制HBV DNA复制能力以及较少的耐药率和病毒反跳率;同时替比夫定能更强地抑制病毒抗原蛋白的表达,可能与较高的HBeAg血清学转换率有关。     

Reduced glomerular filtration rate but sustained virologic response in HIV/hepatitis B co-infected individuals on long-term tenofovir

Summary.  Reports have described a decrease in glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) associated with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) use in HIV positive individuals. However, no study has examined renal function over a prolonged period in HIV/hepatitis B virus (HBV) co-infected patients. We assessed the long-term durability and toxicity of TDF in a cohort of 39 e antigen (eAg) positive co-infected patients commenced on TDF 245 mg daily either in addition to or as part of standard antiretroviral therapy. Immunological and virological parameters were followed to 260 weeks, with the median follow-up period being 251 weeks (range 69–290 weeks). eGFR was calculated using the Modification in Diet in Renal Disease equation. On treatment at 260 weeks, 88% (14/16) had HIV viral load <50 copies/mL, median CD4 count rose from 318 to 532 cells/mm³, median alanine aminotransferase (ALT) fell from 61 IU/L to 42 IU/L, with 35% (7/20) having a normal ALT, median HBV DNA fell from 69 × 10⁶ copies/mL to 500 copies/mL, with 75% (12/16) having an undetectable HBV DNA level and 55% (6/11) becoming eAg negative. Of those with detectable HBV DNA, none had TDF resistance mutations. The eGFR declined by 22.19 mL/min/1.73 mm² from baseline ( P  =   0.023) over this period, which was unaffected by protease inhibitor use, baseline CD4 count, ALT or HBV DNA level. Three patients discontinued TDF therapy due to renal dysfunction. In conclusion, TDF has sustained efficacy but is associated with a significant decline in eGFR. Further larger studies are required to clarify this observation.     

Interferon and lamivudine monotherapy on chronic hepatitis B in Japan

Aim:  We show data of interferon (IFN) and lamivudine monotherapy on chronic hepatitis B in Japan.
Methods:  Data collected from sixty-six chronic hepatitis B (CHB) Japanese patients who were treated with IFN for 6 months were analyzed. The efficacy of long-term IFN therapy in 52 patients with e-antigen positive CHB, and data from 290 chronically HBV-infected patients who were treated with lamivudine for more than 3 years, were analyzed.
Results:  Six-month IFN therapy: among 45 patients with HBeAg at commencement of IFN therapy, nine (20%) were responders. Young patients especially those with high serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels were much more likely to respond to IFN therapy. Twelve-month IFN therapy: theresponse rate was 31% among 52 patients with HBeAg. Long-term lamivudine therapy: YMDD motif mutation was detected in 167 of 290 patients (58%) during lamivudine treatment. Breakthrough hepatitis from lamivudine resistant virus was detected in 93 of 290 patients (32%). Finally, 813 patients were treated by lamivudine between September 1995 and February 2006. Fifteen patients lost HBsAg during and after lamivudine therapy.
Conclusion:  Long-term interferon therapy has a better response than short-term interferon therapy. Some patients lost HBsAg during and after lamivudine therapy.     

Current treatment of HIV/hepatitis B virus coinfection

Coinfection with HIV and hepatitis B virus (HBV) has become a significant global health problem. Liver disease is now one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in individuals with HIV, particularly those with viral hepatitis. There are a number of agents available with dual activity against HIV and HBV, and effective treatment depends on understanding the potential advantages and pitfalls in using these agents. There are a number of unresolved issues in the management of HIV/HBV coinfection. These include the role of liver biopsy, the significance of normal aminotransferase levels, serum HBV DNA threshold for treatment, treatment end-points, and the treatment of HBV when HIV does not yet require treatment. Treatment of HBV should be considered in individuals with HIV/HBV coinfection with evidence of significant fibrosis (>/=F2), or with elevated serum HBV DNA levels (>2000 IU/mL). Sustained suppression of serum HBV DNA to below the level of detection by the most sensitive available assay should be the goal of therapy, and, at present, treatment of HBV in HIV/HBV coinfection is lifelong. If antiretroviral therapy is required, then two agents with anti-HBV activity should be incorporated into the regimen. If antiretroviral therapy is not required, then the options are pegylated interferon, adefovir or the early introduction of antiretroviral therapy. Close monitoring is necessary to detect treatment failure or hepatic flares, such as immune reconstitution disease. Further studies of newer anti-HBV agents in individuals HIV/HBV coinfection may advance treatment of this important condition.     

Tenofovir versus tenofovir plus entecavir for chronic hepatitis B with lamivudine resistance and entecavir resistance

We compared the viral suppressive efficacy of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) mono‐rescue therapy (TDF group) and TDF plus entecavir (ETV) combination‐rescue therapy (TDF + ETV group) in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients with lamivudine resistance and entecavir resistance. One hundred and thirty‐three CHB patients with lamivudine and entecavir resistance were investigated. Ninety‐six patients were treated with TDF and 37 with TDF + ETV for at least 6 months. We compared the virologic response rate (HBV DNA level <20 IU/mL) between the two groups and identified the predictive factors of treatment outcome. There were no significant differences between the two groups in demographic characteristics. Up to 24 months [median: 18 (range 6‐24) months], 85.4% and 89.2% of the TDF group and TDF + ETV group, respectively, achieved a virologic response (P=.068). Only the HBV DNA level at baseline was significantly associated with a virologic response in the multivariate analysis. In a subanalysis of patients with HBV DNA levels ≥4 log (IU/mL) at baseline, a higher proportion of patients in the TDF + ETV group than the TDF group achieved a virologic response (92.9% vs 68.3%; P<.001), while 90% of patients with HBV DNA (IU/mL) levels <4 log in all both TDF and TDF + ETV groups achieved a virologic response. TDF mono‐rescue therapy is a reasonable option in patients with lamivudine resistance and entecavir resistance. However, the combination strategy should be considered in patients with high baseline HBV DNA levels.     

对拉米夫定治疗无应答或变异的乙型肝炎病毒相关性肾炎的治疗

目的探讨对拉米夫定治疗无应答或变异的乙型肝炎病毒相关性肾炎(HBV-GN)的治疗方法。方法 2005年1月至2009年1月南京军区福州总医院诊治的HBV-GN且对拉米夫定治疗无应答或变异的患者共9例。采用恩替卡韦(0.5 mg/d)为主方案治疗9例对拉米夫定治疗无应答或变异的HBV-GN且蛋白尿>1.5 g/d、血HBV-DNA≥1.0×108拷贝/L的患者,观察其疗效及血HBV-DNA的变化。结果 9例患者肾病综合征(NS)7例、蛋白尿伴血尿2例,其中系膜增生性肾炎3例,膜性肾病3例,膜增生性肾炎、IgA肾病及局灶节段系膜增生性肾炎各1例。拉米夫定治疗(14.1±10.3)个月(其中6例联合激素治疗),5例部分缓解(PR)、4例无效(均为NS),改用恩替卡韦治疗后,治疗12个月时7例完全缓解(CR)、1例PR、1例NR,7例检测血清HBV-DNA水平患者中5例降至正常,随访观察了19～27个月,平均(23.7±3.0)个月,至随访结束,完全缓解(CR)7例,NR 2例,均停用激素。未见副反应。结论恩替卡韦为主的治疗对对拉米夫定治疗无应答或变异的HBV-GN是安全有效的,疗程以1年半为宜。     

Efficacy of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor or lamivudine combination with recombinant interferon in non-responders to interferon in hepatitis B virus-related chronic liver disease patients

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Non-response to interferon (IFN) monotherapy is a major therapeutic problem in the management of chronic hepatitis B infection. The efficacy of combination therapy to enhance the immunomodulatory effect of IFN by combining granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GMCSF) or decreasing viral load by adding an antiviral agent such as lamivudine was evaluated prospectively. METHODS: Twenty-four patients with chronic hepatitis B who were non-responders to previous IFN therapy were randomized to receive an IFN and GMCSF (group A, n = 10) or IFN and lamivudine (group B, n = 14) combination for 6 months. The end-of-treatment response was assessed by hepatitis B virus (HBV)-DNA and hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) determination. RESULTS: All patients successfully completed both the treatment schedules. The mean age, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels, liver histology, HBV-DNA levels and distribution of HBV genotypes were comparable between the two groups. At the end of treatment there was a significant decrease in mean ALT levels. The HBV-DNA and HBeAg loss was seen in six of 10 (60%) patients in group A and in seven of 14 (50%) patients in group B. During a mean follow-up of 15 +/- 3 months, two of six (33%) patients in group A and three of seven (43%) patients in group B relapsed with HBV-DNA and HBeAg positivity, which meant an overall sustained response of 40% and 28%, respectively. None of the factors such as HBV viral load, ALT levels or liver histology could predict the non-response to combination therapy or occurrence of relapse. There was a trend in patients with genotype A compared with genotype D towards non-response to therapy, although the difference was not significant. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of IFN plus GMCSF or lamivudine was effective in non-responders to IFN monotherapy. Larger studies using such combination therapies would be helpful in improving treatment strategies for chronic hepatitis B.