Vindesine in patients with metastatic malignant melanoma: a Southwest Oncology Group study

A phase II study using vindesine (3 mg/m2 by slow intravenous push at seven to 14 day intervals) was carried out in 42 patients with metastatic melanoma. There was one complete remission (2.5%) of greater than 12 months duration; seven partial remissions (17.5%) of two, three, three, four, five, six and eight months duration; 11 with no change (27.5%) of one to 10 months duration; and 21 (52.5%) patients with increasing disease. Toxicity included neutropenia, neurotoxicity, phlebitis and cellulitis at the site of injection, alopecia, fever and chills, myalgias, and gastrointestinal toxicity. It was concluded that vindesine does have activity in some patients with metastatic malignant melanoma. Further studies in previously untreated patients are warranted.     

Adjuvant therapy of osteosarcoma--A Phase II trial: Southwest Oncology Group study 9139

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to estimate the time to treatment failure and survival rate of the three-drug combination of doxorubicin, cisplatin, and ifosfamide as primary and postoperative, adjunctive treatment for teenagers and adults with osteosarcoma (OS). METHODS: Sixty-three eligible patients with nonmetastatic OS of the extremities were registered from 24 institutions from February, 1992 through December, 1996. Chemotherapy was comprised of doxorubicin at a dose of 75 mg/m2 and cisplatin at a dose of 120 mg/m2, alternating with doxorubicin at a dose of 50 mg/m2 and ifosfamide at a dose of 8 g/m2. Four cycles were given prior to surgical resection, and four cycles were given after surgery. Outcome measures included the time to treatment failure, overall survival, toxicity, and centralized assessment of tumor necrosis. RESULTS: Thirty-one of 63 eligible patients died, for a 5-year overall survival rate of 58% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 46-71%). The median time to treatment failure was 19 months (95% CI, 12-41 months). A good pathologic response (> or = 90% necrosis) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy was observed in 48% of patients who underwent surgery. There was no correlation noted between response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and patient outcome. Grade 4 hematologic toxicities were frequent (89%), although serious nonhematologic toxicities other than nausea and emesis were uncommon. CONCLUSIONS: The regimen and schedule used in the current study did not improve outcomes compared with prior trials of doxorubicin and cisplatin alone. New, more effective drugs are needed for the treatment of patients with OS. The identification and utilization of molecular markers to predict outcome and response to therapy would facilitate clinical management, limiting exposure to toxic therapies for patients with favorable molecular profiles and identifying those patients who may fail with current approaches as candidates for clinical trials.     

Phase 2 trial of combination thalidomide plus temozolomide in patients with metastatic malignant melanoma: Southwest Oncology Group S0508

BACKGROUND:

In limited institution phase 2 studies, thalidomide and temozolomide has yielded response rates (RRs) up to 32% for advanced melanoma, leading to the use of this combination as “standard” by some. We conducted a multicenter phase 2 trial to better define the clinical efficacy of thalidomide and temozolomide and the immune modulatory effects of thalidomide, when combined with temozolomide, in patients with metastatic melanoma.

METHODS:

Patients must have had stage IV cutaneous melanoma, no active brain metastases, Zubrod PS 0‐1, up to 1 prior systemic therapy excluding thalidomide, temozolomide, or dacarbazine, adequate organ function, and given informed consent. The primary endpoint was 6‐month progression‐free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), RR, toxicities, and assessment of relationships between biomarkers and clinical outcomes. Patients received thalidomide (200 mg/d escalated to 400 mg/d for patients <70, or 100 mg/d escalated to 250 mg/d for patients ≥70) plus temozolomide (75 mg/m²/d × 6 weeks, and then 2 weeks rest).

RESULTS:

Sixty‐four patients were enrolled; 2 refused treatment. The 6‐month PFS was 15% (95% confidence interval [CI], 6%‐23%), the 1‐year OS was 35% (95% CI, 24%‐47%), and the RR was 13% (95% CI, 5%‐25%), all partial. One treatment‐related death occurred from myocardial infarction; 3 other grade 4 events occurred, including pulmonary embolism, neutropenia, and central nervous system (CNS) ischemia. There was no significant correlation between biomarkers and PFS or OS.

CONCLUSIONS:

This combination of thalidomide and temozolomide does not appear to have a clinical benefit that exceeds dacarbazine alone. We would not recommend it further for phase 3 trials or for standard community use. Cancer 2010. © 2010 American Cancer Society.     

Combination chemotherapy plus levamisole in the treatment of disseminated malignant melanoma. A Southwest Oncology Group study

Two hundred-eighty patients were randomized to receive either BCNU, hydroxyurea and imidazole carboxamide (BHD), BHD plus levamisole, or high-dose DTIC plus actinomycin D. There was no difference in response rate in the three groups (24%, 25% and 22%). Females responded better than males and, as expected, those with a better performance status responded more favorably than those with poor performance status. Patients whose primary site of melanoma was on the extremities did significantly better than those melanomas originating on the trunk or head and neck. Patients with lymphocyte counts greater than 2000/mm3 fared better than those with lymphopenia. Those responders who received high-dose DTIC plus actinomycin D had a significantly longer length of response than those receiving the immunotherapy limb. This was also true in those patients who had a prior disease-free interval of greater than 6 months before being placed in this study. Although there was no difference in survival from the start of treatment in all patients, those patients receiving high-dose DTIC plus actinomycin D and who had a prior disease-free interval of greater than 6 months, had significantly superior survival when compared to the immunotherapy limb. It is concluded that the addition of Levamisole to BHD does not improve response rate and may in certain subsets be detrimental to disease-free response and survival. High-dose DTIC plus actinomycin D is equally effective to BHD.     

Phase II trial of 5-fluorouracil plus eniluracil in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: a Southwest Oncology Group study.

BACKGROUND: Eniluracil is a potent, irreversible inactivator of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, the major catabolic enzyme for 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). Pretreatment with eniluracil significantly increases plasma half-life, plasma concentration and oral bioavailability of 5-FU. This multicenter phase II trial was designed to estimate the 6-month survival rate in patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas treated with 5-FU and eniluracil. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and sixteen patients (61 with no prior chemotherapy and 55 with prior chemotherapy) were registered for treatment with eniluracil 50 mg (total dose) p.o. on days 1-7 and 5-FU 20 mg/m(2)/day p.o. on days 2-6 of a 28-day treatment cycle. RESULTS: In 106 patients evaluable for survival, the 6-month survival rate was 34% [95% confidence interval (CI) 22% to 47%, median survival 3.6 months] for patients who had not been treated previously with chemotherapy and 29% (95% CI 16% to 42%, median survival 3.4 months) for those who had received prior chemotherapy. For those patients with measurable disease, the confirmed response rates were 8% and 2%, respectively. The most common grade 3-4 toxicities were neutropenia (29% of patients) and diarrhea (12% of patients). Overall, 69% of patients experienced a grade 3 or worse adverse event during treatment. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the combination of a 7-day course of eniluracil and a 5-day course of oral 5-FU has limited activity in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer, and is associated with a high frequency of clinically significant adverse events.     

Phase II study of tauromustine in disseminated malignant melanoma

Forty-seven patients with metastatic malignant melanoma took part in a phase II trial of tauromustine (TCNU), a new chlorethylnitrosourea based on the endogenous amino acid taurine. TCNU was given orally at a dosage of 130 mg/m² every fifth week. No patient had previously received cytotoxic therapy. Among 37 evaluable patients, 26 patients experienced progressive disease including seven patients with early death, five showed no change, and six partial responses, yielding an objective response rate of 16%. Responses were limited to subcutaneous, lymph node, bone and lung metastases. Median time to progression was 26 weeks for responders. The treatment schedule was well tolerated with a median dose of 88% of the predicted dose given during all cycles. Dose-limiting toxicity was thrombocytopenia. It appears that TCNU is active in disseminated malignant melanoma with a response rate similar to other nitrosoureas.     

Phase II trial of cimetidine in metastatic melanoma. A Hoosier Oncology Group trial

Fifteen evaluable patients with metastatic malignant melanoma who had received no prior chemotherapy were treated with high-dose cimetidine orally, 600 mg q.i.d. Although three patients had stable disease lasting 2-4 months, there were no objective responses. Median survival was 5.3 months (range 1-18 months). Toxicity was essentially negligible except for severe diarrhea in one patient and worsening liver function abnormalities in another. High-dose cimetidine does not have any significant activity in metastatic melanoma.     

Phase II trial of chlorozotocin and fluorouracil in islet cell carcinoma: a Southwest Oncology Group study.

PURPOSE: A phase II trial that used fluorouracil (5-FU) and chlorozotocin (CTZ) was performed in patients with metastatic islet cell carcinoma to determine the response rate and toxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received four cycles of induction chemotherapy. Good-risk patients received 5-FU 800 mg/m2/d days 1 to 4 as a continuous intravenous (IV) infusion (CIV) and CTZ 175 mg/m2 IV on day 1. Poor-risk patients (previous radiation to > or = 25% bone marrow-bearing areas; serum bilirubin > or = 5 mg/dL; creatinine > 1.0 mg/dL) received 5-FU 600 mg/m2/d and CTZ 75 mg/m2 in a similar manner. In responding or stable patients, reduced doses of 5-FU and CTZ were continued as maintenance therapy (maximum, 18 months). RESULTS: Forty-seven of 51 patients were eligible, and 44 received chemotherapy. Fourteen of 44 patients had partial responses, with 13 of 36 (36%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 21.0% to 54.0%) good-risk patients and one of eight (12%; 95% CI, 0.3 to 52.6%) poor-risk patients responding. Median survival of all patients was 25 months, and the median response duration was 11 months. Side effects were moderate to severe and included myelosuppression and gastrointestinal toxicity. Thirteen patients developed renal toxicity, which was severe or life-threatening in five. This seemed to be related to the administration of cumulative doses of CTZ > or = 1,500 mg. CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate that the combination of 5-FU and CTZ has activity in islet cell carcinoma, but the occurrence of renal toxicity secondary to CTZ may limit the use of this agent.     

A clinical trial of intravenous vinorelbine tartrate plus tamoxifen in the treatment of patients with advanced malignant melanoma

BACKGROUND: The aim of the current trial was to assess the efficacy and toxicity of weekly intravenous vinorelbine tartrate with daily oral tamoxifen in the treatment of patients with advanced or metastatic malignant melanoma. METHODS: Thirty-one patients were treated with vinorelbine tartrate, 30 mg/m(2) intravenously, weekly every 13 weeks and then every 2 weeks thereafter until progression of disease or severity of toxicity warranted discontinuation. Tamoxifen, 10 mg orally, twice a day was administered daily starting on Day 1 of chemotherapy with vinorelbine tartrate. Thirty patients had cutaneous melanoma with metastases and 1 patient had ocular melanoma with metastases. Eight patients had received prior chemotherapy. RESULTS: Of the 30 evaluable patients with cutaneous melanoma, 6 achieved a partial response, for an overall response rate of 20% (95% confidence interval, 7-38%). There was no response in the patient with ocular melanoma. Major sites of response include the adrenal gland, lung, tonsil, and cutaneous/subcutaneous tissues. Three patients had a prolonged duration of response lasting > or = 12 months. Side effects generally were mild and tolerable. Grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicity occurred in 26% and 13% of patients, respectively. Nonhematologic toxicity included mild fatigue, paresthesia, and local arm discomfort from infusion. CONCLUSIONS: Weekly intravenous vinorelbine tartrate plus daily oral tamoxifen appears to be active in the treatment of patients with malignant melanoma. Further clinical trials in malignant melanoma patients treated with vinorelbine tartrate and tamoxifen appear warranted.     

Phase II trial of edatrexate plus carboplatin in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: a Southwest Oncology Group study

Background: Edatrexate and carboplatin are each active single agents in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Preclinical studies in NSCLC lines have demonstrated schedule-dependent synergy of edatrexate followed by carboplatin. In a phase I trial, we demonstrated the tolerability of this combination, the ability of ice-chip cryotherapy to ameliorate dose-limiting mucositis, and promising activity in NSCLC. This phase II trial (SWOG 9207) was undertaken to investigate the efficacy of this regimen in stage IV NSCLC. Methods: A total of 24 patients with stage IV disease were accrued to this Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) multicenter study. Treatment consisted of edatrexate 80 mg/m² (50% dose on day 8) intravenously weekly for 5 weeks, then every other week, and carboplatin 350 mg/m² every 28 days. Results: Of the 24 patients, 23 were assessable for toxicity and response; one was ineligible for study entry. Myelosuppression was the most significant toxicity; grade 3–4 neutropenia was seen in 8/23 patients. Two patients died of neutropenic sepsis during the first cycle of therapy, in both instances associated with the presence of pleural effusions. Although mild mucositis was common, it was dose-limiting (grade 3) in only three patients. Objective response was observed in 3/23 patients (13%). The median survival time was 7 months, and 30% of patients remained alive at one year. Conclusions: This study suggests that ice-chip cryotherapy is effective in reducing the severity of mucositis typically associated with this edatrexate schedule of administration. However, unexpectedly severe myelosuppression resulted in death from neutropenic sepsis in two patients with third space fluid collections, leading to a protocol amendment to exclude such patients from study entry. Furthermore, response and median survival with this dose schedule of edatrexate and carboplatin do not appear to be improved compared to other chemotherapeutic regimens tested by SWOG in this patient population. Received: 12 August 1996 / Accepted: 8 May 1997     

Phase II trial of carboplatin and paclitaxel in cisplatin-pretreated advanced transitional cell carcinoma: a Southwest Oncology Group study

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study was to assess the efficacy and toxicity of carboplatin and paclitaxel administered every 3 weeks in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma, previously treated with cisplatin-based therapy. METHODS: Eligibility included metastatic or locally advanced unresectable transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelial tract. Prior chemotherapy, except taxanes, was permitted within 12 months. Adequate hematologic, hepatic, and renal function and a performance status of 0-2 were required. Treatment consisted of paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 intravenously for 3 hours followed by carboplatin, target area under the curve = 5 repeated every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Forty-four patients were enrolled. Thirty-four (77%) patients had a performance status of 0 or 1. Twenty-five (57%) of the patients had received prior neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy, and 19 (43%) had received it for metastatic disease. In all, 181 cycles were administered (median, 3.5 cycles; range, 1-11 cycles). The predominant NCI CTC (version 2.0) Grades 3 and 4 toxicities consisted of myelosuppression in 28 patients and neuropathy in 11 patients. There were no treatment-related deaths. Of the 44 patients, 1 (2%) had a complete response, 2 (5%) had a partial response, and 4 (9%) had an unconfirmed partial response, for an overall response rate of 16% (95% confidence interval [CI] 7-30%). The median progression-free survival was 4 months (95% CI 3-5 months) and the median survival was 6 months (95% CI 5-8 months). CONCLUSIONS: Carboplatin and paclitaxel combination is well tolerated and has modest activity in platinum refractory advanced urothelial carcinoma. Effective regimens need to be developed in cisplatin-pretreated urothelial carcinoma.     

Phase II trial of high-dose intermittent interleukin-2 in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a Southwest Oncology Group study

A phase II trial of intermittent high-dose recombinant interleukin-2 (rIL-2) was initiated to evaluate the response rate, remission duration, and toxic effects in patients with measurable metastatic renal cell carcinoma. The rIL-2 was administered as a bolus intravenous infusion at a dose level of 10.0 x 10(6) U/m2 three times weekly, preceded by indomethacin (50 mg orally). Dose reductions of rIL-2 for hypotension and other grade 3 or 4 toxic effects were permitted. Forty-four patients were entered and 41 were eligible. Previous treatment included nephrectomy (23 patients), radiation therapy (seven), and hormone therapy (three). Most toxic effects observed were moderate and included nausea, vomiting, anorexia (85%); hypotension (85%); fever, chills (78%); central nervous system changes (24%); myelosuppression (27%); and creatinine elevation (15%). Four instances of grade 4 toxicity were observed and included nausea, vomiting with dehydration; hypotension; and myocardial infarction. Thirty patients (73%) required dose adjustments because of toxicity. Five responses (12%) were seen, which included one complete and four partial. Sites of response included lung, liver, and soft tissue; the duration of response ranged from 2 to 20+ months. These results demonstrate that this schedule of rIL-2 can be administered in an outpatient setting, and can produce tumor regression in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma, including durable complete responses.     

Phase II trial of recombinant tumor necrosis factor in disseminated malignant melanoma.

Twenty-one patients with disseminated malignant melanoma received recombinant tumor necrosis factor (TNF), 150 micrograms/m2 intravenously on days 1-5 every 2 weeks for four cycles and then every 3 weeks. Recombinant TNF produced no meaningful palliation. One patient (5%) attained an objective response of nodal, but not visceral, disease, which lasted 3 weeks. The median time to progression was 4 weeks. The median survival was 7.7 months. Ninety percent of patients developed mild to severe cytokine "flu." Ten percent developed significant hepatic toxicity (AST greater than 3 times normal). As a single agent, recombinant TNF is not likely to palliate disseminated malignant melanoma. However, combinations of recombinant TNF and cytotoxic or immune modulatory agents, particularly gamma interferon, may merit further investigation.     

Phase II trial of karenitecin in patients with malignant melanoma: clinical and translational study.

PURPOSE: A phase II trial of the novel camptothecin karenitecin (BNP1350) was conducted to determine its efficacy and tolerability in patients with metastatic melanoma. Patients were biopsied to determine topoisomerase expression at baseline and response to therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had metastatic melanoma with up to three prior chemotherapy and/or any number of immunotherapy regimens. Treatment consisted of an i.v. infusion of 1 mg/m(2) karenitecin daily for 5 days with cycles repeated every 3 weeks. Fine-needle aspiration biopsies were done before treatment and on day 3 to determine topoisomerase expression from patients' tumors. RESULTS: Forty-three patients were evaluable for response and toxicity. Most patients (72%) had stage M1C disease and were previously exposed to chemotherapy (56%). The investigational agent was well tolerated with limited gastrointestinal side effects or fatigue. The major toxicity seen was reversible noncumulative myelosuppression. One patient had a complete response after 11 months of therapy. No partial responses were seen, but 33% of the patients had disease stabilization lasting > or =3 months. Topoisomerase I, IIalpha, and IIbeta expression and localization were determined in a subset of patients. Topoisomerase I expression was highest, followed by topoisomerase IIbeta and topoisomerase IIalpha. CONCLUSION: Karenitecin was a well-tolerated investigational agent in this phase II study; side effects were generally mild and mostly hematologic. Karenitecin has significant activity in metastatic melanoma. Melanoma metastases express high levels of topoisomerase I. We did not observe any compensatory increase in topoisomerase II upon treatment with karenitecin.     

Phase II study of aziridinylbenzoquinone (AZQ) in patients with central nervous system malignancies: a Southwest Oncology Group study

Summary AZQ, an alkylating agent with lipophilic characteristics allowing CNS penetration was studied in patients with primary CNS malignancies refractory to surgical and radiotherapeutic modalities. Responses were evaluated by three criteria: neurologic examination, performance status and CT scan of the brain. Improvement in all three parameters with stable or decreasing doses of decadron was required for a partial response. Thirty-six poor risk (prior chematherapy) patients with Grades III and IV astrocytomas were treated with 30 mg/m². Three patients had a partial response (14, 17, 60 weeks duration). Two patients had mixed responses (worsening of one disease parameter with improvement in another), four had stable disease and one patient had improvement in neurologic parameters with a stable CT scan. Twenty-six patients had increasing disease. Fifteen good risk patients (no prior chemotherapy) with recurrent grades III and IV astrocytomas were treated at a dose of 40 mg/m² intravenously every three weeks. There were no objective responses in this group of patients. Three patients with nonastrocytomas were treated and no responses observed. The drug was well tolerated. Myelosuppression in the form of leukopenia and thrombocytopenia was the major toxicity. Myelosuppression required dose reductions in eight patients and discontinuation of therapy due to repeated treatment delays in two patients. AZQ at doses of 30 and 40 mg/m² given on an intermittent bolus schedule is inactive in patients with Grades III and IV recurrent astrocytoma.Presented in part at the Second International Symposium on Biology of Brain Tumours, London, October 1984.