奥沙利铂和伊立替康治疗失败后转移性结直肠癌的化疗选择

  目的  通过回顾性分析奥沙利铂及伊立替康化疗失败的转移性结直肠癌化疗疗效,探索结直肠癌的解救化疗方案。  方法  回顾2005年1月~2013年3月本院经奥沙利铂及伊立替康化疗失败的转移性结直肠癌患者37例,分析化疗的有效率（RR）及无进展生存（PFS）。  结果  化疗总有效率13.51%（5/37）,5例PR,12例SD,20例PD;以培美曲塞为基础化疗方案总有效率略高于其他方案（17.64% vs. 10.00%,P=0.64）,未延长PFS（2.00个月vs. 1.63个月,HR=0.79,95%CI:0.35~1.78,P=0.58）;以雷替曲塞为基础的化疗方案有效率略高于其他方案（16.67% vs. 12.00%,P=0.34）,未延长PFS（1.58个月vs. 1.90个月,HR=2.24,95%CI:0.98~5.12,P=0.06）。  结论  以培美曲塞或雷替曲塞为基础的联合化疗方案对奥沙利铂及伊立替康化疗失败的转移性结直肠癌患者有一定疗效,值得进一步开展临床研究。      

Triplet combination of fluoropyrimidines, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer

In recent years, the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer has improved because of the availability of 3 active cytotoxic drugs, 2 monoclonal antibodies, and the expanded use of surgery on metastases in selected patients, leading to a median overall survival of almost 2 years. Chemotherapy remains the primary option for these patients, and the development of first-line chemotherapy regimens associated with higher activity and improved efficacy is still a major topic of interest. This article provides an overview of the development of a first-line treatment combination of irinotecan and oxaliplatin plus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU; FOLFOXIRI) or oral fluoropyrimidines in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, evaluating the feasibility and the activity of these regimens in phase I/II studies and the results of a recent phase III study that demonstrates that FOLFOXIRI significantly increases response rate, radical surgical resection of metastases, progression-free survival, and overall survival compared with an infusional 5-FU-containing doublet such as FOLFIRI (5-FU/leucovorin/irinotecan).     

A dose finding and pharmacokinetic study of capecitabine in combination with oxaliplatin and irinotecan in metastatic colorectal cancer

Purpose  The GONO-FOLFOXIRI regimen demonstrated higher activity and efficacy than FOLFIRI in metastatic colorectal cancer patients. The aim of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose of capecitabine, in substitution of 5-fluorouracil, combined with oxaliplatin and irinotecan and to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of the drugs. Patients and methods  We treated 15 patients with escalating doses of capecitabine (from day 1 to 7) and fixed doses of oxaliplatin (85 mg/m²) plus irinotecan (165 mg/m²) (both administered on day 1), repeated every 2 weeks. Pharmacokinetic analysis was performed on plasma samples collected at the first cycle of treatment. Results  The maximum tolerated dose of capecitabine resulted 2,000 mg/m²/day, with diarrhea being the only dose-limiting toxicity. Large interpatient variability in the pharmacokinetic parameters of investigated drugs was observed. Results in terms of activity are promising. Conclusions  At the maximum tolerated dose of capecitabine of 2,000 mg/m²/day the combination is feasible with promising activity and deserves further investigations.     

Clinical predictors of severe toxicity in patients treated with combination chemotherapy with irinotecan and/or oxaliplatin for metastatic colorectal cancer

Introduction

Little has been published regarding clinical predictors of severe toxicity in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) treated with combination chemotherapy (CT) with oxaliplatin and/or irinotecan.

Material and Methods

We analyzed retrospectively 142 patients treated between 1996 and 2004 in our center with these regimes with regards to grade 3–4 toxicity and overall survival (OS) rates. Köhne's prognostic classification could be applied in all patients.

Results

Köhne classification: good (54.2%), intermediate (26.8%), and poor prognosis (19%). 50.4% received irinotecan-based CT. Median number of cycles 6 with a total response rate of 38.9%. 23.2% stopped first-line CT due to toxicity. 50.7% suffered grade 3–4 toxicity: digestive (28.2%), hematologic (19.7%), and fatigue (25.4%). 7.7% episodes of neutropenic fever with 4.9% toxic deaths. 70.9% of grade 3–4 episodes occurred in the first four cycles. Median follow-up of 33.9 mo; median OS of 15.9 mo. For Köhne classification: good (20 mo), intermediate (15.8 mo), and poor (6.8 mo). Toxicity analysis: female sex and age>70 yr predicted higher overall grade 3–4 toxicity, with no differences in CT efficacy; age>70 yr and PS>1 predicted higher grade 3–4 fatigue. No relationship could be found between baseline laboratory characteristics and higher toxicity, except baseline hemoglobin and grade 3–4 hematologic toxicity.

Conclusions

Female and elderly patients have a higher grade 3–4 toxicity rate when treated with combination CT with oxaliplatin or irinotecan. Prognostic classifications such as Köhne's can help differentiate subgroups of patients who benefit little with the use of combination CT.     

Randomized multicenter phase II study comparing a combination of fluorouracil and folinic acid and alternating irinotecan and oxaliplatin with oxaliplatin and irinotecan in fluorouracil-pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer patients.

PURPOSE: To assess antitumor activity and safety of two regimens in advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with proven fluorouracil (5-FU) resistance in a randomized phase II study: 5-FU/folinic acid (FA) combined with alternating irinotecan (also called CPT-11) and oxaliplatin (FC/FO tritherapy), and an oxaliplatin/irinotecan (OC) combination. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-two patients were treated: arm FC/FO (32 patients) received, every 4 weeks, FA 200 mg/m(2) followed by a 400-mg/m(2) 5-FU bolus injection, then a 600-mg/m(2) continuous infusion of 5-FU on days 1 and 2 every 2 weeks administered alternately with irinotecan (180 mg/m(2) on day 1) and oxaliplatin (85 mg/m(2) on day 15). Arm OC (30 patients) received oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) and irinotecan 200 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks. RESULTS: In an intent-to-treat analysis, two partial responses lasting 10.7 and 16 months were observed with the tritherapy regimen, and seven (median duration, 11 months; range, 10.6 to 11.4 months) were observed with the bitherapy regimen. Median progression-free and overall survival times were 8.2 and 9.8 months, respectively, in the FC/FO arm and 8.5 and 12.3 months, respectively, in the OC arm. Main grade 3/4 toxicities were, respectively, neutropenia, 53% and 47%; febrile neutropenia, 13% and 3%; diarrhea, 19% and 10%; vomiting, 6% and 13%; and neurosensory toxicity, 3% and 3%. No treatment-related deaths occurred. CONCLUSION: The every-3-weeks OC combination is safe and active in advanced 5-FU-resistant CRC patients. The lower activity data seen with the tritherapy regimen may be related to the lower dose intensities of irinotecan and oxaliplatin in this schedule.     

Capecitabine monotherapy as salvage treatment after failure of chemotherapy containing oxaliplatin and irinotecan in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

Aim: There has been limited data on capecitabine monotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) patients who were previously treated with both oxaliplatin/5‐fluorouracil(FU)/leucovorin (FOLFOX) and irinotecan/5‐FU/leucovorin (FOLFIRI). Methods: We analyzed 20 patients between August 2002 and March 2008 with metastatic CRC who had been treated with capecitabine monotherapy after the failure of FOLFOX and FOLFIRI. Results: Overall, one partial response was observed (overall response rate, 5%) and stable disease was observed in 11 patients (55.0%). The disease control rate was 60.0%. The median progression‐free survival (PFS) was 2.3 months (95% CI 1.9–2.7) and the median overall survival (OS) was 5.3 months (95% CI 4.6–6.0). Patients without ascites had longer PFS than those with ascites (P = 0.02). Patients with more than three metastatic sites had poorer OS than those with less than two (P = 0.01). Grade 3 or 4 non‐hematological toxicities included hand–foot syndrome in one patient. There were no grade 3 or 4 hematological toxicities or treatment‐related deaths. Conclusion: The capecitabine monotherapy had a moderate disease control rate and a tolerable toxicity profile as third‐line or fourth‐line treatment for metastatic CRC patients who were refractory to standard chemotherapy with no further treatment options.     

Bevacizumab in combination with biweekly capecitabine and irinotecan, as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

Background:

Combination of capecitabine and irinotecan (XELIRI regimen) is an active and well tolerated treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this regimen in combination with bevacizumab (BV), as first-line treatment for mCRC.

Patients and methods:

A total of 46 consecutive patients received a combination of BV (5 mg kg⁻¹, day 1), irinotecan (175 mg m⁻², day 1) and capecitabine (1000 mg m⁻² twice daily on day 2–8), every 2 weeks. Patients were treated until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary objective was to determine the progression-free survival (PFS) and safety profile.

Results:

The overall response rate (ORR) was 67.4%, with a disease control rate (ORR+stable disease) of 93.5%. Median PFS and overall survival (OS) were 12.3 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 6.5–18.1 months) and 23.7 months (95% CI: 16.7–30.6 months), respectively. The most frequent grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events were asthenia (7%), diarrhoea (7%), nausea (9%) and vomiting (7%).

Conclusion:

Bevacizumab combined with biweekly XELIRI is a highly active first-line regimen for mCRC treatment, showing encouraging PFS, ORR and OS with a good tolerability.     

Phase I study of weekly oxaliplatin plus irinotecan in previously treated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: In vitro synergy between Oxal (oxaliplatin) and CPT-11 (irinotecan) has been reported. Oxaliplatin exerts its antineoplastic activity through the formation of platinum-DNA adducts. Resistance to oxaliplatin is through repair of these adducts, which is inhibited by irinotecan. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Oxaliplatin and irinotecan were administered weekly for 4 weeks followed by a 2-week rest period. The dose of oxaliplatin was escalated first, starting at 30 mg/m(2). Once a dose of 60 mg/m(2) was attained, the weekly dose of irinotecan was escalated, from 40 mg/m(2) to 85 mg/m(2). A total of 49 previously treated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer were entered in order to establish the maximum tolerated dose. Pharmacokinetics of oxaliplatin and irinotecan were analyzed. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients were evaluable for toxicity. The recommended phase II doses for this combination are oxaliplatin 60 mg/m(2) and irinotecan 50 mg/m(2), weekly x 4 q 6 weeks. Diarrhea was the most common dose-limiting toxicity. No pharmacological interactions were noted between oxaliplatin and irinotecan. Twelve of the 47 evaluable patients (26%) achieved a partial response. CONCLUSION: Weekly combination of oxaliplatin and irinotecan appears to be a well tolerated and active regimen in patients previously treated for metastatic colorectal cancer. Further investigations of this regimen are warranted.     

A multicenter phase II study of the combination of oxaliplatin, irinotecan and capecitabine in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer

The triple drug combination consisting of irinotecan, oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil (FOLFOXIRI) has demonstrated higher activity and efficacy compared to the doublet FOLFIRI. 5-Fluorouracil could be substituted in FOLFOXIRI regimen by capecitabine, an oral fluoropyrimidine with similar efficacy. Recently, a dose-finding trial has demonstrated the feasibility of the combination of irinotecan, oxaliplatin and capecitabine (XELOXIRI) and established their recommended doses. The aim of this study was to evaluate the activity of XELOXIRI. A total of 36 patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer received irinotecan 165 mg m⁻² and oxaliplatin 85 mg m⁻² on day 1 plus capecitabine 2000 mg m⁻² per day orally in two doses from day 1 to day 7, every 2 weeks. Grade 3–4 toxicities were infrequent, expect for neutropenia and diarrhoea, which were each observed in 30% of patients. Two complete and twenty-two partial responses were obtained, corresponding to an overall response rate of 67% (95% CI 51.4–82%). After a median follow-up of 17.7 months, the median progression-free and overall survival were 10.1 and 17.9 months, respectively.The substitution of 5-fluorouracil with capecitabine, in combination with irinotecan and oxaliplatin, is feasible and does not impair the activity of the regimen. However, the XELOXIRI combination is associated with a high incidence of diarrhoea and, therefore, should be considered as a not preferable alternative to FOLFOXIRI.     

Oxaliplatin rechallenge in metastatic colorectal cancer patients after prior oxaliplatin treatment

Because the number of cytotoxic agents available for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is limited, rechallenge with the same chemotherapy agents can provide a continuum of treatment. This study investigated the efficacy and feasibility of oxaliplatin rechallenge in mCRC patients who had been previously exposed to oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. Patients were included if they had mCRC and evaluable disease, had remained disease-free or progression-free for at least 6 months after the last dose of prior oxaliplatin-based therapy, and were retreated with oxaliplatin therapy. Between January 2009 and May 2014, 110 patients were retreated with oxaliplatin-based regimens; of these, 42 (38.2%) had received prior oxaliplatin as adjuvant chemotherapy and 68 (61.8%) as palliative chemotherapy. The overall response rate to oxaliplatin rechallenge was 30.9% (34/110), and the disease control rate was 68.2% (75/110), with one patient achieving complete response, 33 achieving partial response, and 41 having stable disease. Median progression-free survival and overall survival following oxaliplatin rechallenge were 5.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.4–7.4 months) and 18.5 months (95% CI, 14.0–23.0 months), respectively. Sixteen patients experienced grade 2 or 3 neuropathy. Ten patients experienced any grade hypersensitivity reaction within four cycles of treatment, including six who stopped treatment due to grade 3 or 4 hypersensitivity reactions. Rechallenge with oxaliplatin-based therapy may be an option for patients who achieve at least 6 months of disease-free or progression-free survival with prior oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. However, neurotoxicity and hypersensitivity reactions should be carefully monitored in this setting.     

Phase II trial of combined irinotecan and oxaliplatin given every 3 weeks to patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND: Both irinotecan and oxaliplatin are active agents in the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, and there is a strong preclinical rationale for combining these 2 agents. Therefore, a Phase II trial was designed and conducted to determine the efficacy and tolerability of combined irinotecan and oxaliplatin given every 3 weeks to patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. METHODS: Patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer received irinotecan at a dose of 175 mg/m2 and oxaliplatin at a dose of 130 mg/m2, both given intravenously every 3 weeks. Objective responses were evaluated every 2 courses and were confirmed at least 4 weeks after the initial determination. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients were enrolled and treated in the current trial. Of the 53 patients whose responses were evaluable, 18 (34%) achieved a partial response, 27 (51%) had stable disease, and 8 (15%) developed disease progression as their best response to the treatment. The intent-to-treat median survival for all patients was 16.4 months and the time to progression was 4.8 months. All 55 patients were available for toxicity analysis (according to version 2.0 of the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria). The most common Grade 3-4 toxic effect was neutropenia, which was reported to occur in 22 patients (40%). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of irinotecan and oxaliplatin appears to be safe and active when used to treat patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Treatment results with this regimen were similar to those reported for other combined frontline chemotherapy regimens for colorectal cancer. When this particular regimen wa used, neutropenia was found to be the predominant toxicity.     

UFT/leucovorin and oxaliplatin alternated with UFT/leucovorin and irinotecan in metastatic colorectal cancer

A total of 41 metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) patients received tegafur/uracil (UFT)+leucovorin (LV)+oxaliplatin alternated with UFT/LV+irinotecan. The overall response rate was 58.5% (95% confidence interval, 42.2-73.3%), and the median progression-free survival was 8.8 months. There were no grade 4 toxicities; 12 patients (29%) experienced grade 3 diarrhoea. There were no cases of hand-foot syndrome. This alternating regimen seems to be effective and well tolerated in the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic CRC.     

Alternating irinotecan with oxaliplatin combined with UFT plus leucovorin (SCOUT) in metastatic colorectal cancer

Tegafur-uracil (UFT) plus leucovorin (LV, folinic acid) with alternating irinotecan and oxaliplatin were effective and well tolerated in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in a phase I study. This study expanded the maximum tolerated dose group. Patients aged >or=18 years had histologically confirmed, inoperable, previously untreated, measurable mCRC. Patients received irinotecan 180 mg m(-2) on day 1, oxaliplatin 100 mg m(-2) on day 15 and UFT 250 mg m(-2) plus LV 90 mg on days 1-21 every 28 days. The phase I/II study comprised 45 patients, 29 at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). The response rate in 38 evaluable patients was 63% (95% confidence interval (CI): 49-80). Median time to progression and overall survival were 8.7 months (95% CI: 7.9-10.4) and 16.8 months (95% CI: 9.6-25.3), respectively. In the MTD group, one patient had grade 3 leucopenia; one had grade 3 neutropaenia; three had grade 3 diarrhoea; and one had grade 3 neurotoxicity. No hand-foot syndrome grade >1 was seen. In total, 67% of eligible patients received second-line therapy. UFT plus LV with alternating irinotecan and oxaliplatin is an efficacious first-line treatment for mCRC, with minimal neurotoxicity and hand-foot syndrome.     

Concurrent irinotecan, oxaliplatin and UFT in first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: a phase I study

The feasibility of combining UFT plus leucovorin (LV) with alternating irinotecan and oxaliplatin was investigated in the first-line treatment of patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Twenty-five patients, median age 63 (range 24-79) years, World Health Organisation performance status 0-2 and median four marker lesions, received irinotecan 180 mg m(-2) on day 1, oxaliplatin 85-100 mg m(-2) on day 15 and UFT 200-300 mg m(-2) day(-1) with LV 90 mg day(-1), days 1-21 of a 28-day cycle. Patients were treated in cohorts of three. At the highest dose (irinotecan 180 mg m(-2), oxaliplatin 100 mg m(-2) and UFT 300 mg m(-2) day(-1)), three of four patients experienced grade 3 toxicity. Diarrhoea, lethargy and vomiting were dose-limiting. Three of nine patients had grade 2 toxicities at the maximum tolerated dose (irinotecan 180 mg m(-2), oxaliplatin 100 mg m(-2) and UFT 250 mg m(-2) day(-1)). There were no grade 3 toxicities in the first month of therapy. The overall response rate was 71% in 21 evaluable patients; progression-free survival was 8.8 months. Alternating irinotecan and oxaliplatin plus UFT is an effective and well-tolerated first-line treatment for patients with advanced colorectal cancer. We recommend a dose of irinotecan 180 mg m(-2) on day 1, oxaliplatin 100 mg m(-2) on day 15 and UFT 250 mg m(-2) day(-1) with LV 90 mg day(-1) on days 1-21 of a 28-day cycle for future studies.     

依立替康(Irinotecan,CPT-11)治疗晚期大肠癌临床研究

目的：评价ＣＰＴ－１１（商标名：开普拓）单药治疗晚期大肠癌的临床疗效及其不良反应。材料与方法：从１９９７年１１月至１９９９年３月入选晚期大肠癌６９例,符合收治标准者６１例,可评价闻效者５０例,其中,以前未接受过任何化疗的病人２５例,经过一个５ＦＵ为主方案化疗后耐药的病人２５例。ＣＰＴ－１１３０－３００mg/m^2,静肪点滴,每３周为一疗程。除ＰＤ病人外,至少用药３周期。结果：在可评价病例中,８例（１６．     

Triplet combination with irinotecan plus oxaliplatin plus continuous-infusion fluorouracil and leucovorin as first-line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicenter phase II trial.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of irinotecan (CPT-11) in combination with oxaliplatin (L-OHP) plus fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin (LV) (de Gramont regimen) as first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (MCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-one patients with MCC who had not received prior therapy for metastatic disease were enrolled. Their median age was 60 years; performance status (World Health Organization) was 0 in 12, 1 in 14, and 2 in five patients; 19 patients (61%) had prior surgery, and 14 (45%) had adjuvant chemotherapy. CPT-11 was administered on day 1 at 150 mg/m(2) as a 90-minute intravenous (IV) infusion; L-OHP was administered on day 2 at 65 mg/m(2) as a 2-hour IV infusion; and on days 2 and 3, LV 200 mg/m(2) preceded 5-FU administration of 400 mg/m(2)/d initial IV bolus dose followed by 600 mg/m(2)/d 22-hour IV continuous infusion. The regimen was repeated every 2 weeks. RESULTS: All patients were assessable for toxicity and 30 for response to treatment. Complete response was achieved in two patients (6.5%) and partial response in 16 (51.6%) (overall response rate, 58.1%; 95% confidence interval, 40.7% to 75.4%); eight patients (25.8%) had stable disease, and five (16.1%) had disease progression. The median duration of response was 9 months, and the median time to disease progression was 13 months. Neutropenia grade 3 to 4 occurred in 14 patients (45%) and febrile neutropenia in two (6%). Diarrhea grade 3 to 4 was observed in 10 patients (32%), neurotoxicity grade 3 to 4 in three (9%), and asthenia grade 3 in two (10%). No treatment-related death has occurred. CONCLUSION: The triplet combination of 5-FU/LV + CPT-11 + L-OHP is a highly active regimen with manageable toxicity as front-line treatment in MCC.