Simultaneous surface registration of ictal and interictal SPECT and magnetic resonance images for epilepsy studies

BACKGROUND: Subtraction of ictal and interictal single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) images is known to be successful in localizing the seizure focus in the pre-surgical evaluation of patients with partial epilepsy. A computer-aided methods for producing subtraction ictal SPECT co-registered to the magnetic resonance image (MRI) (the SISCOM method) is commonly used. The two registrations involved in SISCOM are (1) between the ictal-interictal SPECT images, which was shown to be the more critical, and (2) between the ictal image and MRI. OBJECTIVE: To improve the accuracy of ictal-interictal registration in SISCOM by registering all three images (ictal, interictal SPECT, MRI) simultaneously. METHODS: The registration problem is formulated as the minimization of a cost function between three surfaces. Then, to achieve a global minimum of this cost function, the Powell algorithm with randomly distributed initial configurations is used. This technique is tested by a realistic simulation study, a phantom study and a patient study. RESULTS: The results of the simulation study demonstrate that, in surface-based registration, the triple-registration method results in a smaller ictal-interictal SPECT registration error than the pair-wise registration method (P<0.05) for a range of values of the cost-function parameter. However, the improved registration error is still larger than that obtained by the normalized mutual information method (P<0.001), which is a voxel-based registration algorithm. The phantom and patient studies reveal no observable difference between registration results. CONCLUSIONS: Although the improved accuracy of triple registration is slightly worse than voxel-based registration, it will soon be possible to apply the results of this study in research utilizing the triple-registration principle to improving voxel-based results of ictal-interictal registration.     

Quantitative and clinical analysis of SPECT image registration for epilepsy studies.

This study reports quantitative measurements of the accuracy of two popular voxel-based registration algorithms--Woods' automated image registration algorithm and mutual information correlation--and compares these with conventional surface matching (SM) registration. METHODS: The registration algorithms were compared (15 different matches each) for (a) three-dimensional brain phantom images, (b) an ictal SPECT image from a patient with partial epilepsy matched to itself after modification to simulate changes in the cerebral blood flow pattern and (c) ictal/interictal SPECT images from 15 patients with partial epilepsy. Blinded visual ranking and localization of the subtraction images derived from the patient images were also performed. RESULTS: Both voxel-based registration methods were more accurate than SM registration (P < 0.0005). Automated image registration algorithm was more accurate than mutual information correlation for the computer-simulated ictal/interictal images and the patient ictal/interictal studies (P < 0.05). The subtraction SPECTs from SM were poorer in visual ranking more often than the voxel-based methods (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Voxel intensity-based registration algorithms provide significant improvement in ictal/interictal SPECT registration accuracy and result in a clinically detectable improvement in the subtraction SPECT images.     

Use of subtraction ictal SPECT co-registered to MRI for optimizing the localization of seizure foci in children.

Ictal SPECT studies are increasingly used to localize seizure foci in children with refractory epilepsy, but few studies have reported on ictal-interictal subtraction images co-registered to MRI at this age. METHODS: Twenty-seven children with partial epilepsy (aged 3 mo-18 y) underwent ictal ethyl cysteinate dimer (ECD) SPECT (20 mCi/1.73 m2) combined with video-electroencephalography (EEG) and interictal ECD SPECT followed 2 d later by three-dimensional MRI. Ictal-interictal and interictal-ictal subtraction images were computed by registering and normalizing the ictal to the interictal SPECT scans for each child. The ictal, interictal SPECT and subtraction images were registered to each child's MRI. Difference images (ictal-interictal) were then superimposed on MRI for anatomic localization of the perfusion changes. Intra- and interobserver reproducibility and "facility of interpretation" of overlay images were compared with standard analysis of the non-coregistered ictal and interictal scans. RESULTS: Overlay images allowed the detection of at least one hyperperfused focus in 93% of the children, compared with 74% using ictal and interictal scans separately. Seizure onset was suspected clinically, on EEG or on MRI in 20 children. Overlay images were concordant (n = 11) or larger (n = 7) than the suspected focus in 18 of 20 (90%), whereas these images failed to show any abnormality in 1 child and were discordant with MRI in another patient. In the remaining 7, images showed cortical localization in 6 patients. Among the 5 patients who underwent electrocorticography, overlay images were concordant in 3, larger in 1 and absent in 1. The intra- and interobserver reproducibility and facility of interpretation were significantly higher using overlay images than standard analysis, even when ictal and interictal SPECT were co-registered. CONCLUSION: The co-registration of ictal-interictal subtraction SPECT images to MRI seems to be a helpful technique in localizing the onset of seizure and guiding the intracranial recording in childhood epilepsy. Moreover, this method improves sensitivity, enhances intra- and interobserver reproducibility and makes interpretation easier.     

Transmission imaging for registration of ictal and interictal single-photon emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and electroencephalography

A method developed for registration of ictal and interictal single-photon emission tomography (SPET), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and electroencephalography (EEG) is described. For SPET studies, technetium-99m ethyl cysteinate dimer (ECD) was injected intravenously while the patient was monitored on video-EEG to document the ictal or interictal state. Imaging was performed using a triple-head gamma camera equipped with a transmission imaging device using a gadolinium-153 source. The images (128x128 pixels, voxel size 3.7x3.7x3.6 mm3) were reconstructed using an iterative algorithm and postfiltered with a Wiener filter. The gold-plated silver electrodes on the patient's scalp were utilized as markers for registration of the ictal and interictal SPET images, as these metallic markers were clearly seen on the transmission images. Fitting of the marker sets was based on a non-iterative least squares method. The interictal SPET image was subtracted from the ictal image after scaling. The T1-weighted MPRAGE MR images with voxel size of 1.0x1.0x1.0 mm3 were obtained with a 1.5-T scanner. For registration of MR and subtraction SPET images, the external marker set of the ictal SPET study was fitted to the surface of the head segmented from MR images. The SPET registration was tested with a phantom experiment. Registration of ictal and interictal SPET in five patient studies resulted in a 2-mm RMS residual of the marker sets. The estimated RMS error of registration in the final result combining locations of the electrodes, subtraction SPET and MR images was 3-5 mm. In conclusion, transmission imaging can be utilized for an accurate and easily implemented registration procedure for ictal and interictal SPET, MRI and EEG.     

癫痫发作期与发作间期脑血流灌注显像减影法定位致痫灶的价值

目的:研究癫痫发作期与发作间期脑血流灌注显像减影法定位致癫灶的价值.材料和方法:14例癫痫患者在癫痫发作期和发作间期分别进行脑血流灌注显像,两次所得图像进行空间匹配后相减得到减影像,并与EEG、MRI、手术结果及临床表现比较.结果:与发作间期相比,13/14例发作期局部脑血流有不同程度的增高,减影像可显示血流改变的具体部位及形态;1例发作期血流低于发作间期,但病灶区表现明显.手术后病灶病理诊断包括胶质细胞增生、疤痕组织及胶质细胞瘤.术后13例患者发作次数明显减少,1例效果不显著.结论:发作期与发作间期显像减影法定位致痫灶有较高的准确性,有助于术前制定合理的手术方案.     

Transmission imaging for registration of ictal and interictal single-photon emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and electroencephalography

A method developed for registration of ictal and interictal single-photon emission tomography (SPET), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and electroencephalography (EEG) is described. For SPET studies, technetium-99m ethyl cysteinate dimer (ECD) was injected intravenously while the patient was monitored on video-EEG to document the ictal or interictal state. Imaging was performed using a triple-head gamma camera equipped with a transmission imaging device using a gadolinium-153 source. The images (128×128 pixels, voxel size 3.7×3.7×3.6 mm³) were reconstructed using an iterative algorithm and postfiltered with a Wiener filter. The gold-plated silver electrodes on the patient’s scalp were utilized as markers for registration of the ictal and interictal SPET images, as these metallic markers were clearly seen on the transmission images. Fitting of the marker sets was based on a non-iterative least squares method. The interictal SPET image was subtracted from the ictal image after scaling. The T1-weighted MPRAGE MR images with voxel size of 1.0×1.0×1.0 mm³ were obtained with a 1.5-T scanner. For registration of MR and subtraction SPET images, the external marker set of the ictal SPET study was fitted to the surface of the head segmented from MR images. The SPET registration was tested with a phantom experiment. Registration of ictal and interictal SPET in five patient studies resulted in a 2-mm RMS residual of the marker sets. The estimated RMS error of registration in the final result combining locations of the electrodes, subtraction SPET and MR images was 3–5 mm. In conclusion, transmission imaging can be utilized for an accurate and easily implemented registration procedure for ictal and interictal SPET, MRI and EEG. Received 20 September and in revised form 16 October 1999     

Does performing image registration and subtraction in ictal brain SPECT help localize neocortical seizures?

Ictal brain SPECT (IS) findings in neocortical epilepsy (patients without mesiotemporal sclerosis) can be subtle. This study is aimed at assessing how the seizure focus identification was improved by the inclusion of individual IS and interictal brain SPECT (ITS)-MRI image registration as well as performing IS - ITS image subtraction. METHODS: The study involved the posthoc analysis of 64 IS scans using 99mTc-ethyl cysteinate dimer that were obtained in 38 patients without mesiotemporal sclerosis but with or without other abnormalities on MRI. Radiotracer injection occurred during video-electroencephalographic (EEG) monitoring. Patients were injected 2-80 s (median time, 13 s) after clinical or EEG seizure onset. All patients had sufficient follow-up to correlate findings with the SPECT results. All patients had ITS and MRI, including a coronal volume sequence used for registration. Image registration (IS and ITS to MRI) was performed using automated software. After normalization, IS - ITS subtraction was performed. The IS, ITS, and subtraction studies were read by 2 experienced observers who were unaware of the clinical data and who assessed the presence and localization of an identifiable seizure focus before and after image registration and subtraction. Correlation was made with video-EEG (surface and invasive) and clinical and surgical follow-up. RESULTS: Probable or definite foci were identified in 38 (59%) studies in 33 (87%) patients. In 52% of the studies, the image registration aided localization, and in 58% the subtraction images contributed additional information. In 9%, the subtraction images confused the interpretation. In follow-up after surgery, intracranial EEG or video-EEG monitoring (or both) has confirmed close or reasonable localization in 28 (74%) patients. In 6 (16%) patients, SPECT indicated false seizure localization. CONCLUSION: Image registration and image subtraction improve the localization of neocortical seizure foci using IS, but close correlation with the original images is required. False localizations occur in a minority of patients.     

Contribution of subtraction ictal SPECT coregistered to MRI to epilepsy surgery: a multicenter study

Objective  A multicenter prospective study was performed to assess the additional value of a subtraction ictal SPECT coregistered to MRI (SISCOM) technique to traditional side-by-side comparison of ictal- and interictal SPECT images in epilepsy surgery. Methods  One hundred and twenty-three patients with temporal and extratemporal lobe epilepsy who had undergone epilepsy surgery after evaluation of scalp ictal and interictal electroencephalogram (EEG), MRI, and ictal and interictal SPECT scans were followed up in terms of postsurgical outcome for a period of at least 1 year. Three reviewers localized the epileptogenic focus using ictal and interictal SPECT images first by side-by-side comparison and subsequently by SISCOM. Concordance of the localization of the epileptogenic focus by SPECT diagnosis with the surgical site and inter-observer agreement between reviewers was compared between side-by-side comparison and SISCOM. Logistic regression analysis was performed in predicting the surgical outcome with the dependent variable being the achievement of a good postsurgical outcome and the independent variables using the SISCOM, side-by-side comparison of ictal and interictal SPECT images, MRI, and scalp ictal EEG. Results  The SISCOM presented better concordance in extratemporal lobe epilepsy and less concordance in temporal lobe epilepsy than side-by-side comparison. Inter-observer concordance was higher in SISCOM than in side-by-side comparison. Much higher concordance of the epileptogenic focus by SPECT diagnosis with the surgical site was obtained in patients with good surgical outcome than in those with poor surgical outcome. These differences in concordance between good and poor surgical outcomes were greater in SISCOM than in side-by-side comparison. Logistic regression analysis showed the highest odds ratio of 12.391 (95% confidence interval; 3.319, 46.254) by SISCOM evaluation for concordance of the epileptogenic focus with the surgical site in predicting good surgical outcome. Conclusions  A SISCOM technique of ictal and interictal SPECT images provides higher predictive value of good surgical outcome and more reliability on the diagnosis of the epileptogenic focus than side-by-side comparison in medically intractable partial epilepsy.     

Automated detection of local normalization areas for ictal-interictal subtraction brain SPECT.

Whole-brain activity is often chosen to quantitatively normalize peri-ictal and interictal SPECT scans before their subtraction. This use is not justified, because significant and extended modification of the cerebral blood flow can occur during a seizure. We validated and compared 2 automatic methods able to determine the optimal reference region, using simulation and clinical data. METHODS: In the first method, the selected reference region is the intersection of peri-ictal-interictal areas with no significantly different z values. The other method relies on a 3-dimensional iterative voxel aggregation. The increase of the selected volume is stopped by using 2 different variance tests (Levene and SE). These algorithms were tested on 39 epileptic patients and were validated using 1 interictal and 10 peri-ictal scans simulated from the mean image of 22 healthy subjects. RESULTS: In the patient studies, the mean relative activity of the selected regions, compared with whole-brain activity (classic normalization), was 122.6%. Their average relative size (compared with the size of the whole brain) was 33.2% for the z map method, 22.8% for the SE test, and 11.8% for the Levene test. After application of our automatic processes, subtraction of the simulated images revealed a recovery of abnormal regions up to 45% larger than the region obtained with classic normalization. CONCLUSION: These results illustrate the role of normalization on the subtracted peri-ictal and interictal images. Our methods are automatic and objective and give good results on various simulated images. The z map construction is worth considering because it is simple, selects large parts of the brain, and requires little computation time.     

A simple method for generating temporal subtraction image in bone SPECT-initial evaluation in pelvic region-

We proposed and optimized a simple method of temporal subtraction image between successive bone single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) images for supporting interpretation of temporal changes, and we evaluated its clinical utility. This method consisted of image registration, count normalization, and image subtraction. For image registration, we used a BEAT-Tl software. For count normalization, a pixel value of the normal accumulation part in a SPECT image was used as a reference region. We evaluated accuracy of image registration and optimized the normalization procedure. The accuracy of image registration ranged within 1 pixel in all directions (x, y, x-axis, and rotation). As the reference region, the second lumbar vertebra showed the best results in terms of the normalization procedure. Our method simply allowed the production of a temporal subtraction image. Because the software used in this method can be used free, this method would be available in every institution.     

Ictal SPECT in neocortical epilepsies: clinical usefulness and factors affecting the pattern of hyperperfusion

Introduction: The aims of this analysis were to: (1) determine the value of ictal SPECT in the localization of neocortical epileptogenic foci, (2) evaluate the relationships between the results of ictal SPECT and other potential affecting factors, and (3) compare traditional visual analysis and the subtraction method.Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 81 consecutive patients with neocortical epilepsy who underwent epilepsy surgery and achieved a favourable surgical outcome, including 36 patients with normal MRI. Side-by-side visual analysis and subtraction images were classified as correctly localizing,correctly lateralizing, or non-localizing/non-lateralizing images according to the resected lobe.Results: Side-by-side visual analysis and subtraction SPECT correctly localized the epileptogenic lobe in 58.9% and 63.0% of patients, respectively. The two methods were complementary and the diagnostic sensitivity of ictal SPECT using the two methods was 79.0%. Ictal SPECT using the visual method correctly localized the epileptogenic lobe more frequently in patients with a localizing pattern of ictal scalp EEG at the time of radioligand injection. When using subtraction images, an injection delay of less than 20 s after seizure onset was significantly correlated with correct localization. The subtraction method was superior to the visual method for localizing frontal lobe epilepsy (FLE) and parietal lobe epilepsy (PLE), and in patients with non-localizing/non-lateralizing EEG at onset.Conclusions: Ictal SPECT analyses using visual and subtraction methods are useful and complementary for the localization of the epileptogenic foci of neocortical epilepsy. Early radioligand injection and ictal EEG patterns are related to ictal SPECT localization. The subtraction method may be more useful in some epileptic syndromes.     

The value of interictal brain SPECT in epilepsy patients without mesial-temporal sclerosis

PURPOSE: Most of the literature concerning interictal SPECT brain scanning in patients with seizures has involved the evaluation of those with temporal lobe epilepsy. The authors' aim was to determine the utility of interictal SPECT in patients with neocortical epilepsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-four patients with neocortical epilepsy were evaluated with 95 interictal SPECT scans and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). RESULTS: Fifty-four percent of studies with normal MRI findings had SPECT images without regions of hypoperfusion. Sixty-one percent of patients with abnormal MRI results had matching defects visible on SPECT images. Fourteen scans (only 24%) had focal hypoperfusion by SPECT and no obvious matching MRI finding. CONCLUSIONS: Interictal SPECT, without a comparison ictal study, is of potentially limited value in localizing neocortical seizure foci. SPECT findings usually match MRI findings. Interictal SPECT, however, may still be of value in confirming abnormalities detected by ictal examination.     

Sensitivity and specificity of quantitative difference SPECT analysis in seizure localization.

True ictal SPECT can accurately demonstrate perfusion increases in the epileptogenic area but often requires dedicated personnel waiting at the bedside to accomplish the injection. We investigated the value of perfusion changes as measured by ictal or immediate postictal SPECT in localizing the epileptogenic region in refractory partial epilepsy. METHODS: Quantitative perfusion difference images were calculated by registering, normalizing and subtracting ictal (or immediate postictal) from interictal SPECT for 53 patients with refractory epilepsy. Perfusion difference SPECT results were compared with visually interpreted SPECT, scalp electroencephalography (EEG), MRI, PET and intracranial EEG. RESULTS: In 43 patients (81%), discrete areas of increased perfusion (with ictal injections) or decreased perfusion (with postictal injections) were noted. Interictal scalp EEG was localizing in 28 patients (53%), ictal scalp EEG was localizing in 35 patients (66%) and intracranial EEG was localizing in 22 patients (85%) (of 26 patients who underwent invasive study). MRI was localizing in 34 patients (64%), PET was localizing in 32 of 45 patients (71%), interictal SPECT was localizing in 26 patients (49%) and peri-ictal SPECT (visual interpretation) was localizing in 30 patients (57%). By comparison with an intracranial EEG standard of localization, SPECT subtraction analysis had 86% sensitivity and 75% specificity. CONCLUSION: Our data provide evidence that SPECT perfusion difference analysis has higher sensitivity and specificity than any other noninvasive localizing criterion and can localize epileptogenic regions with accuracy comparable with that of intracranial EEG. To obtain these results, one must apply knowledge of the timing of the ictal injection relative to seizure occurrence.     

The hazards of lack of co-registration of ictal brain SPECT with MRI: A case report of sinusitis mimicking a brainstem seizure focus

BACKGROUND: Single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) following injection of radiotracer during a seizure is known as ictal SPECT. Comparison of an ictal SPECT study to a baseline or interictal study can aid identification of a seizure focus. CASE PRESENTATION: A young woman with encephalitis and refractory seizures underwent brain SPECT during a period of frequent seizure-like episodes, and during a seizure-free period. A focal area of increased radiotracer uptake present only when she was experiencing frequent seizure-like episodes was originally localized to the brainstem, but with later computerized co-registration of SPECT to MRI, was found to lie outside the brain, in the region of the sphenoid sinus. CONCLUSION: Low-resolution SPECT images present difficulties in interpretation, which can be overcome through co-registration to higher-resolution structural images.     

Evaluation of ictal brain SPET using statistical parametric mapping in temporal lobe epilepsy

An automated voxel-based analysis of brain images using statistical parametric mapping (SPM) is accepted as a standard approach in the analysis of activation studies in positron emission tomography and functional magnetic resonance imaging. This study aimed to investigate whether or not SPM would increase the diagnostic yield of ictal brain single-photon emission tomography (SPET) in temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE). Twenty-one patients (age 27.14 +/- 5.79 years) with temporal lobe epilepsy (right in 8, left in 13) who had a successful seizure outcome after surgery and nine normal subjects were included in the study. The data of ictal and interictal brain SPET of the patients and baseline SPET of the normal control group were analysed using SPM96 software. The t statistic SPM?t? was transformed to SPM?Z? with various thresholds of P<0.05, 0.005 and 0.001, and corrected extent threshold P value of 0.05. The SPM data were compared with the conventional ictal and interictal subtraction method. On group comparison, ictal SPET showed increased uptake within the epileptogenic mesial temporal lobe. On single case analysis, ictal SPET images correctly lateralized the epileptogenic temporal lobe in 18 cases, falsely lateralized it in one and failed to lateralize it in two as compared with the mean image of the normal group at a significance level of P<0.05. Comparing the individual ictal images with the corresponding interictal group, 15 patients were correctly lateralized, one was falsely lateralized and four were not lateralized. At significance levels of P<0.005 and P<0.001, correct lateralization of the epileptogenic temporal lobe was achieved in 15 and 13 patients, respectively, as compared with the normal group. On the other hand, when comparison was made with the corresponding interictal group, only 7 out of 21 patients were correctly lateralized at the threshold of P<0.005 and five at P<0.001. The result of the subtraction method was close to the single case analysis on SPM at P<0.05. However, at higher thresholds (P<0.005 and 0.001) the subtraction method was comparable to the SPM results only when individual ictal images were compared with the normal control group, and not when comparison was with the interictal group. It is concluded that SPM is an alternative diagnostic method for the localization or lateralization of the seizure focus in temporal lobe epilepsy and that interictal SPET could be omitted if a normal brain SPET database were to be established. The medical cost of seizure localization would thereby be reduced.     

Functional imaging in reading epilepsy: A case report

Reading epilepsy is an uncommon epileptic syndrome preferentially related to the temporoparietal region of the language dominant hemisphere. We report ictal and interictal brain perfusion SPECT images in a 28-year-old woman who was reading epilepsy.     

Positron emission tomography and single photon emission computed tomography in epilepsy care

Radiopharmaceutical brain imaging is clinically applied in planning resective epilepsy surgery. Cerebral sites of seizure generation-propagation are highly associated with regions of hyperperfusion during seizures, and with glucose hypometabolism interictally. For surgical planning in epilepsy, the functional imaging modalities currently established are ictal single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) with [(99m)Tc]technetium-hexamethylpropyleneamine oxime (HMPAO) or with [(99m)Tc]technetium-ethylene cysteine dimer (ECD), and interictal positron emission tomography (PET) with 2-[(18)F]fluoro-2-deoxyglucose (FDG). Ictal SPECT and interictal FDG PET can be used in presurgical epilepsy evaluations to reliably: (1) determine the side of anterior temporal lobectomy, and in children the area of multilobar resection, without intracranial electroencephalographic recording of seizures; (2) select high-probability sites of intracranial electrode placement for recording ictal onsets; and, (3) determine the prognosis for complete seizure control following anterior temporal lobe resection. Coregistration of a patient's structural (magnetic resonance) and functional images, and statistical comparison of a patient's data with a normal data set, can increase the sensitivity and specificity of these SPECT and PET applications to the presurgical evaluation.     

Automatic registration of MR and SPECT images for treatment planning in prostate cancer

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To aid in surgical and radiation therapy planning for prostate adenocarcinoma, a general-purpose automatic registration method that is based on mutual information was used to align magnetic resonance (MR) images and single photon emission computed tomographic (SPECT) images of the pelvis and prostate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors assessed the effects of various factors on alignment between pairs of MR and SPECT images, including the use of particular pulse sequences in MR imaging, image voxel intensity scaling, the use of different regions on the MR-SPECT histogram, spatial masking of nonoverlapping visual data between images, and multiresolution optimization. A mutual information algorithm was used as the cost function for automatic registration. Automatic registration was deemed acceptable when it resulted in a transformation with less than 2 voxel units (6 mm) difference in translation and less than 2 degree difference in rotation from that obtained with manual registration performed independently by nuclear medicine radiologists. RESULTS: Paired sets of MR and SPECT image volumes from four of five patients were successfully registered. For successful registration, MR images must be optimal and registration must be performed at full spatial resolution and at the full intensity range. Masking, cropping, and the normalization of mutual information, used to register partially overlapping MR-SPECT volumes, were not successful. Multiresolution optimization had little effect on the accuracy and speed of the registration. CONCLUSION: Automatic registration between MR and SPECT images of the pelvis can be achieved when data acquisition and image processing are performed properly. It should prove useful for prostate cancer diagnosis, staging, and treatment planning.     

Towards an optimal reference region in single-photon emission tomography difference images in epilepsy

There is marked variability in the cerebral blood flow (CBF) between the ictal and interictal state in epilepsy, and it would therefore be desirable to increase the reliability of ictal/interictal single-photon emission tomography (SPET) difference images. We aimed to improve the step of quantitative normalization of images by finding the best possible reference region. In 16 patients (11 with lateralization of the epileptogenic focus, five with bilateral foci) both ictal and inter-ictal SPET scans were performed after injection of technetium-99m labelled tracer. Then, each region among a selected set (brain+cerebellum, brain, cerebellum, hemispheres, and for patients with an expected lateralization, cortical lobe containing the focus and symmetrical contralateral lobe) was investigated by comparison of the regional ictal/inter-ictal variance in counts. Among patients with a suspected lateralized focus, the distribution of CBF in the contralateral cortical lobe appeared to vary less between ictal and inter-ictal states than in other investigated areas. As a consequence, this latter region constitutes the best choice as a reference region. For patients with bilateral foci, the cerebellum appears to be a good compromise even though it presents with significant CBF changes. Received 9 April and in revised form 20 September 1999     

Towards an optimal reference region in single-photon emission tomography difference images in epilepsy

There is marked variability in the cerebral blood flow (CBF) between the ictal and interictal state in epilepsy, and it would therefore be desirable to increase the reliability of ictal/interictal single-photon emission tomography (SPET) difference images. We aimed to improve the step of quantitative normalization of images by finding the best possible reference region. In 16 patients (11 with lateralization of the epileptogenic focus, five with bilateral foci) both ictal and inter-ictal SPET scans were performed after injection of technetium-99m labelled tracer. Then, each region among a selected set (brain+cerebellum, brain, cerebellum, hemispheres, and for patients with an expected lateralization, cortical lobe containing the focus and symmetrical contralateral lobe) was investigated by comparison of the regional ictal/inter-ictal variance in counts. Among patients with a suspected lateralized focus, the distribution of CBF in the contralateral cortical lobe appeared to vary less between ictal and inter-ictal states than in other investigated areas. As a consequence, this latter region constitutes the best choice as a reference region. For patients with bilateral foci, the cerebellum appears to be a good compromise even though it presents with significant CBF changes.