A magnetic resonance imaging-based prognostic scoring system to predict outcome in transplant-eligible patients with multiple myeloma

Diffuse and focal bone marrow infiltration patterns detected by magnetic resonance imaging have been shown to be of prognostic significance in all stages of monoclonal plasma cell disorders and have, therefore, been incorporated into the definition of the disease. The aim of this retrospective analysis was to develop a rapidly evaluable prognostic scoring system, incorporating the most significant information acquired from magnetic resonance imaging. Therefore, the impact of bone marrow infiltration patterns on progression-free and overall survival in 161 transplant-eligible myeloma patients was evaluated. Compared to salt and pepper/minimal diffuse infiltration, moderate/severe diffuse infiltration had a negative prognostic impact on both progression-free survival (P<0.001) and overall survival (P=0.003). More than 25 focal lesions on whole-body magnetic resonance imaging or more than seven on axial magnetic resonance imaging were associated with an adverse prognosis (progression-free survival: P=0.001/0.003 and overall survival: P=0.04/0.02). A magnetic resonance imaging-based prognostic scoring system, combining grouped diffuse and focal infiltration patterns, was formulated and is applicable to whole-body as well as axial magnetic resonance imaging. The score identified high-risk patients with median progression-free and overall survival of 23.4 and 55.9 months, respectively (whole-body-based). Multivariate analyses demonstrated that the magnetic resonance imaging-based prognostic score stage III (high-risk) and adverse cytogenetics are independent prognostic factors for both progression-free and overall survival (whole-body-based, progression-free survival: hazard ratio=3.65, P<0.001; overall survival: hazard ratio=5.19, P=0.005). In conclusion, we suggest a magnetic resonance imaging-based prognostic scoring system which is a robust, easy to assess and interpret parameter summarizing significant magnetic resonance imaging findings in transplant-eligible patients with multiple myeloma.     

Targeted therapy of multiple myeloma

The diagnosis of multiple myeloma requires the presence of monoclonal bone marrow plasma cells, a monoclonal (M) protein in serum and/or urine and evidence of end-organ damage from the plasma cell proliferative disorder. Initial therapy for transplant-eligible patients includes thalidomide, bortezomib or lenalidomide, all with dexamethasone. Stem cells for a possible autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) should be collected if the patient is considered eligible for an ASCT. Initial therapy for patients ineligible for an autologous stem cell transplant includes melphalan and prednisone as well as thalidomide, bortezomib or lenalidomide. More than 100 agents are in phase I, II or III clinical trials. The most promising are carfilzomib and pomalidomide.     

Transplant eligibility in elderly multiple myeloma patients: Prospective external validation of the international myeloma working group frailty score and comparison with clinical judgment and other comorbidity scores in unselected patients aged 65-75 years

Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is feasible and effective in selected older patients with Multiple Myeloma, but specific criteria for evaluating ASCT eligibility in elderly patients are lacking. We evaluated 131 patients aged 65-75 considered for ASCT at our center: The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), Hematopoietic cell transplantation comorbidity index (HCT-CI) and IMWG frailty score were obtained at diagnosis, but the intensity of treatment was left to physician's choice. The scores and age's impact on outcome was analyzed: 85 patients were judged transplant eligible, whereas 46 patients received a less intensive treatment (median follow up 27 months). No patients classified as frail had been considered eligible to ASCT with a worse outcome compared to fit and unfit patients (median PFS (progression free survival): 7.9 vs 32.9 and 29.6 months; P < .001). PFS was superior in the ASCT group (35.6 vs 19.9 months, P .013). In the ASCT group, PFS was better in patients aged 65-69 years than in patients ≥70 (51.5 vs 27.7 months, P.004). Indeed, in unfit patients aged ≥70 the PFS of the ASCT group was comparable to NO ASCT group (18 vs 27 months, P = .33) whereas in unfit patients aged 65-69 PFS was superior in the ASCT group: 43.3 vs 18.4 months, P .01. ISS III and impaired functional status independently affected PFS in a multivariate analysis (P .011 and P .006). While CCI and HCT-CI did not predict different outcome in ASCT patients, the IMWG frailty score would be of help in identifying unfit patients aged 70-75, whose outcome with ASCT selected by clinical judgment was no better than with less intensive treatments.     

Humoral immune depression following autologous stem cell transplantation is a marker of prolonged response duration in patients with mantle cell lymphoma

Rituximab maintenance (RM) after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is standard-of-care for young patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). RM may enhance post-transplantation immune depression and risk of infections. We compared infection incidence and immune consequences of RM versus observation in transplanted MCL patients. All randomized patients included in the LyMa trial were eligible. The following parameters were collected prospectively: occurrence of fever, infection, hospitalization, neutropenia, hypogammaglobulinemia, CD4 lymphopenia and γ globulin (Ig) substitution. The post-ASCT period was divided into four periods in order to assess the possible effects of RM or ASCT on immune status. Each arm included 120 patients. Concerning infection incidence and all biological parameters, there was no difference between the two arms during the first year post ASCT. After this period, RM patients were more exposed to fever (P=0.03), infections (P=0.001), hypogammaglobulinemia (P=0.0001) and Ig substitution (P<0.0001). Incidences of hospitalization, neutropenia and CD4 lymphopenia were not different between the two arms. The number of rituximab injections was correlated with infections and hypogammaglobulinemia, P<0.0001 and P=0.001; but was not correlated with neutropenia and CD4 lymphopenia. Ig substitution did not modify infection incidence. Patients who presented hypogammaglobulinemia <6 g/L or <4 g/L had longer 3-years progression-free survival (PFS), this applies to RM patients (P=0.012 and P=0.03) and to the global cohort (P=0.008 and P=0.003). Hypogammaglobulinemia did not influence overall survival. Occurrence of infectious event, neutropenia and CD4 lymphopenia did neither influence PFS nor overall survival. Post-ASCT RM in MCL patients causes sustained hypogammaglobulinemia, which is independently correlated with improved PFS.     

Assessing the safety of autologous stem cell transplant pathway via ambulatory care for patients with multiple myeloma

High-dose chemotherapy (HDT) with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is the standard of care for eligible multiple myeloma (MM) patients with improved progression-free and overall survival. We reviewed the ambulatory care unit pathway for MM patients who underwent HDT/ASCT in a tertiary hospital to assess safety efficacy and outcomes. We concluded that the ambulatory care model offered for MM patients undergoing HDT/ASCT is a safe alternative pathway and highlighted further improvements.     

High-dose melphalan (200 mg/m2) supported by autologous stem cell transplantation is safe and effective in elderly (>or=65 years) myeloma patients: comparison with younger patients treated on the same protocol

Limited information is available on the feasibility and efficacy of autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in multiple myeloma (MM) patients >65 years of age. In 1995-2005, 22 myeloma patients >or=65 years (median 68, eight >or=70) and 79 patients <65 years (median 57) were included in an identical treatment protocol. The first progenitor cell mobilization with cyclophosphamide plus granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) was successful in 95 and 96% of the patients, respectively. To date, 92 patients have received MEL (melphalan) 200 mg/m2 supported by ASCT. No early treatment-related deaths were observed among 22 elderly patients, whereas one younger patient died early. Engraftment and the need for supportive care were comparable between groups. The elderly patients tended to have more WHO grade 3-4 oral or gastrointestinal toxicity when compared to the younger patients (45 vs 23%, P=0.06). After ASCT, a complete response was observed in 44% of the elderly patients and 36% of the younger patients, respectively. No difference was observed between these age groups in progression-free survival (23 vs 21 months) or overall survival (57 vs 66 months) after ASCT. We conclude that MEL200 is a safe and efficacious treatment in selected elderly myeloma patients.     

Impact of failed response to novel agent induction in autologous stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the response to induction therapy on the long-term prognosis of multiple myeloma (MM) after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in the era of novel agents (NAs). A total of 171 patients who were newly diagnosed with MM and underwent early ASCT were analyzed. One hundred ten had a NA-based induction therapy, and 61 patients had a non-NA-based induction therapy. After a median follow-up of 45.4 months, the 4-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) from transplantation were 60.5 and 25.5 %, respectively, for the NA-based induction group and 54.6 and 15.6 %, respectively, for the non-NA-based induction group. Multivariate analyses revealed that the patients who had NA-based induction had a significantly shorter OS (P?<?0.001) and PFS (P?<?0.001) when at least a partial response (PR) was not achieved. In patients who did not receive NAs before ASCT, lack of at least a PR to induction therapy was not associated with a survival disadvantage. These findings suggest that, unlike pretransplantation induction before NAs, patients who do not respond to induction treatment using NAs may not derive a benefit from ASCT. The relevance of induction failure differs for corticosteroid- and NA-based induction.     

Favourable results with a single autologous stem cell transplant following conditioning with busulphan and cyclophosphamide in patients with multiple myeloma

Both single and tandem cycles of high dose therapy and autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (ASCT) have been shown to improve survival in multiple myeloma (MM) patients. We report outcomes in 104 MM patients undergoing a single transplant after conditioning with a conventional myeloablative regimen, busulphan and cyclophosphamide. The patients were either in a first (71%), or subsequent remission (29%). Peripheral blood stem cells were mobilized using cyclophosphamide and granulocyte colony stimulating factor. The conditioning regimen consisted of busulphan 0.85 mg/kg given orally every 6 h (16 doses) and cyclophosphamide 60 mg/kg/d given intravenously for 2 d. The entire conditioning, transplant and post-transplant course were in the outpatient setting for 45% patients. At a median follow-up of 26 months (range 2-98 months), the median overall and progression-free survival were 57 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 47-68] and 26 months (95% CI 20-32) respectively. Younger age and higher CD34+ cell dose infused were independently predictive of improved overall and progression-free survival. Busulphan and cyclophosphamide is an effective and well-tolerated preparative regimen for ASCT that can be given to MM patients in the outpatient setting.     

Survival for older patients with acute myeloid leukemia: a population-based study

BackgroundAcute myeloid leukemia is the second most common leukemia among United States adults with a median age of 69 years. We investigated recent clinical practices related to treatments and disease outcomes in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia in the United States.ResultsAmong 5,480 patients with acute myeloid leukemia (median age 78 years, range 65-93), 38.6% received leukemia therapy within three months of diagnosis (treated group). Practice changed with 16.3% of treated patients receiving hypomethylating agents after 2004 when those agents became available. Median survival was two months in the untreated group versus six months in the treated group (P<0.01) with the biggest improvements seen in those aged 65-69 years (10 months vs. 4 months; P<0.01) and 70-74 years (8 months vs. 3 months; P<0.01). In 46 patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (0.8%), the median survival from diagnosis was 22 months.ConclusionsTherapy for leukemia improves overall survival in older acute myeloid leukemia patients. Based on their comorbidities, most patients up to 80 years of age should be considered for treatment. New therapies including hypomethylating agents and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation are promising and must be compared with other chemotherapy regimens.Key words: acute myeloid leukemia, older patients, treatment, disease outcome, survival     

Role of high-dose melphalan with autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma patients receiving botezomib-containing induction therapy

To examine the role of high-dose melphalan therapy with autologous stem cell transplantation (HDM/ASCT) in the final outcomes of multiple myeloma (MM) patients receiving bortezomib-containing induction therapy (IT), we analyzed relationships between quality of response after IT including bortezomib or HDM/ASCT and survival. In total, 92 MM patients who received IT with bortezomib followed by HDM/ASCT were enrolled. The median follow-up was 28.0 months. Three-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 41.1 and 72.0 %, respectively. A complete response (CR) after HDM/ASCT was a strong prognostic factor for PFS and OS (p = 0.002 and 0.001, respectively). Additionally, out of 67 patients who failed to achieve CR after IT, 36 (53.7 %) patients achieved CR after HDM/ASCT. PFS and OS in patients with CR after additional HDM/ASCT were similar to those in patients who had already achieved CR after IT. However, achievement of at least very good partial response following IT with bortezomib failed to improve PFS and OS (p = 0.35 and 0.11, respectively). Thus, we conclude that post-HDM/ASCT CR is the best prognostic factor for both PFS and OS regardless of response to bortezomib. Therefore, HDM/ASCT remains an important therapy in MM patients even after introduction of bortezomib IT.     

Outcomes of primary refractory diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL) treated with salvage chemotherapy and intention to transplant in the rituximab era

Rituximab‐containing salvage chemotherapy followed by high‐dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT ) in chemosensitive patients remains the standard of care for patients with relapsed and refractory diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL ). However, its role in those patients achieving less than a complete response to first‐line therapy (primary refractory disease) in the rituximab era is not well defined. We reviewed the outcomes of 82 transplant‐eligible patients with primary refractory DLBCL who underwent salvage therapy with the intent of administering high‐dose therapy and ASCT to patients achieving chemosensitive remission. The estimated 3‐year overall and progression‐free survival for all patients was 38% and 29%, respectively, and 65% and 60% respectively for patients proceeding to stem cell transplant. Long‐term remission was achieved in 45% of patients achieving a partial response (PR) to initial induction therapy and <20% of patients with stable or progression of disease following initial therapy. These results suggest that salvage chemotherapy with the intent of subsequent high‐dose therapy and ASCT remains a feasible strategy in certain patients with primary refractory DLBCL , particularly for those achieving a PR to frontline therapy. The primary barrier to curative therapy in patients with primary refractory disease is resistance to salvage therapy, and future studies should be aimed towards increasing the response rate in this population.     

IgD multiple myeloma—a clinical profile and outcome with chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation

IgD myeloma accounts for 2% of myeloma subtypes and has higher incidence of complications and a poorer outcome. The characteristics and outcomes of 25 patients with IgD myeloma (2.6% of all myeloma patients), including 11 patients treated with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) are reported. The presenting features were not unique for myeloma, but it appears that the commonest presenting symptom was bone pain in 20 (80%) patients. Other associated disorders were B-CLL in —1 patient and hairy cell leukemia in another. Three patients had a marked increase in bone marrow reticulin. Three (out of a total of 9) patients had 13q deletion (1 by cytogenetics and 2 by interphase fluorescence in situ hybridisation [FISH]), while 2 patients had a complex karyotype. A total of 11 patients were treated with ASCT, while 14 patients had chemotherapy alone. The response to treatment was: in the ASCT group 2 had a complete response (CR) and 9 had a good partial response (PR), while in the chemotherapy group 6 had a good PR with no CRs. The median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) after autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (APBSCT) has not yet been reached after a median follow up of 4 years. The median PFS after chemotherapy was 1.23 years (95% CI 1.02–1.44). The mean OS transplantation was 5.09 years compared with 2.03 years for those treated with chemotherapy alone. However, this difference was not statistically significant (log rank p=0.09). This small series appears to suggest that outcome for IgD myeloma remains poor with chemotherapy and appears to be superior with ASCT, and larger studies are needed to confirm these findings.     

Bortezomib before and after autologous stem cell transplantation overcomes the negative prognostic impact of renal impairment in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a subgroup analysis from the HOVON-65/GMMG-HD4 trial

Renal impairment is frequent in patients with multiple myeloma and is correlated with an inferior prognosis. This analysis evaluates the prognostic role of renal impairment in patients with myeloma treated with bortezomib before and after autologous stem cell transplantation within a prospective randomized phase III trial. Eight hundred and twenty-seven newly diagnosed myeloma patients in the HOVON-65/GMMG-HD4 trial were randomized to receive three cycles of vincristine, adriamycin, dexamethasone (VAD) or bortezomib, adriamycin, dexamethasone (PAD) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation and maintenance with thalidomide 50 mg daily (VAD-arm) or bortezomib 1.3 mg/m² every 2 weeks (PAD-arm). Baseline serum creatinine was less than 2 mg/dL (Durie-Salmon-stage A) in 746 patients and 2 mg/dL or higher (stage B) in 81. In myeloma patients with a baseline creatinine ≥2 mg/dL the renal response rate was 63% in the VAD-arm and 81% in the PAD-arm (P=0.31). The overall myeloma response rate was 64% in the VAD-arm versus 89% in the PAD-arm with 13% complete responses in the VAD-arm versus 36% in the PAD-arm (P=0.01). Overall survival at 3 years for patients with a baseline creatinine ≥2 mg/dL was 34% in the VAD-arm versus 74% in the PAD-arm (P<0.001) with a progression-free survival rate at 3 years of 16% in the VAD-arm versus 48% in the PAD-arm (P=0.004). Overall and progression-free survival rates in the PAD-arm were similar in patients with a baseline creatinine ≥2 mg/dL or <2 mg/dL. We conclude that a bortezomib-containing treatment before and after autologous stem cell transplantation overcomes the negative prognostic impact of renal impairment in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. The trial was registered at www.trialregister.nl as NTR213 and at www.controlled-trials.com as ISRCTN 64455289     

Double versus single autotransplantation in multiple myeloma; a single center experience of 100 patients

One hundred patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) were treated with high-dose chemotherapy followed by single or double autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Up-front treatment with a double ASCT tended to prolong progression-free and overall survival.     

Autologous transplantation in elderly patients with multiple myeloma: are we asking the right questions?

Multiple myeloma is a disease of the elderly. Survival outcomes remain unacceptably low in older adults with multiple myeloma. To date, no obvious difference in tumor biology has been elucidated to explain the survival disparity between older and younger patients. Multiple factors including comorbidity, performance status, decreased physiologic reserve and potentially undertreatment contribute to poor outcomes in elderly patients with multiple myeloma. High-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is increasingly being used to treat elderly patients with multiple myeloma in an effort to improve survival outcomes. Recent case comparison studies, and preliminary transplant registry data suggest that selected older patients can be treated with high-dose chemotherapy effectively with similar toxicity and survival benefits compared to younger patients. Traditional upper age limits for autologous transplantation are being challenged along with the definition of 'elderly' itself. Ultimately, the role of high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell rescue in the upfront treatment of older adults with multiple myeloma can only be established by prospective randomized trials. In the process of designing studies to investigate the use of ASCT in older patients, multiple issues unique to the elderly population will need to be considered. First, it will be critical to develop and validate patient selection algorithms that incorporate measures of comorbidity, cognitive function, physiologic reserve and psychosocial function to identify patients most likely to tolerate and benefit from ASCT. Second, preparative and conditioning regimens will need to be further tailored to maximize the benefit to risk ratio. Finally, outcome measures in clinical trials should include disability and quality of life measures, which may be equally important in making treatment decisions for older patients. The future application and study of autologous transplantation in older patients with multiple myeloma provides a unique opportunity to challenge ageism and serve as a model for development of tailored assessments and interventions in this population.     

Early lymphocyte recovery predicts superior survival after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma or non-Hodgkin lymphoma

Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) improves survival in patients with previously untreated multiple myeloma (MM) and relapsed, chemotherapy-sensitive, aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Lower relapse rates seen in allogeneic stem cell transplantation have been related to early absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) recovery as a manifestation of early graft-verus-tumor effect. In ASCT, the relation between ALC recovery and clinical outcomes in MM and NHL was not previously described. This is a retrospective study of patients with MM and NHL who underwent ASCT at the Mayo Clinic between 1987 and 1999. The ALC threshold was determined at 500 cells/microL on day 15 after ASCT. The study identified 126 patients with MM and 104 patients with NHL. The median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) times for patients with MM were significantly longer in patients with an ALC of 500 cells/microL or more than patients with an ALC of fewer than 500 cells/microL (33 vs 12 months, P <.0001; 16 vs 8 months, P <.0003, respectively). For patients with NHL, the median OS and PFS times were significantly longer in patients with an ALC of 500 cells/microL or more versus those with fewer than 500 cells/microL (not reached vs 6 months, P <.0001; not reached vs 4 months, P <.0001, respectively). Multivariate analysis demonstrated day 15 ALC to be an independent prognostic indicator for OS and PFS rates for both groups of patients. In conclusion, ALC is correlated with clinical outcome and requires further study. (Blood. 2001;98:579-585)     

Pre-transplant prognostic factors of long-term survival after allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation with matched related/unrelated donors

Mobilized peripheral blood has become the predominant stem cell source for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. In this retrospective single center study of 442 patients with hematologic malignancies, we analyzed prognostic factors for long-term survival after peripheral blood stem cell transplantation from HLA-matched related or unrelated donors. To account for disease/status heterogeneity, patients were risk-stratified according to the Disease Risk Index. Five-year overall survival was similar after transplants with matched related and unrelated donors (45% and 46%, respectively; P=0.49). Because donor age ≥60 years impacted outcome during model building, we further considered 3 groups of donors: matched unrelated (aged <60 years by definition), matched related aged <60 years and matched related aged ≥60 years. In multivariate analysis, the donor type/age group and the graft CD34⁺ and CD3⁺ cell doses impacted long-term survival. Compared with matched unrelated donor transplant, transplant from matched related donor <60 years resulted in similar long-term survival (P=0.67) while transplant from matched related donor ≥60 years was associated with higher risks for late mortality (hazard ratio (HR) 4.41; P=0.006) and treatment failure (HR: 6.33; P=0.009). Lower mortality risks were observed after transplant with CD34⁺ cell dose more than 4.5×10⁶/kg (HR: 0.56; P=0.002) and CD3⁺ cell dose more than 3×10⁸/kg (HR: 0.61; P=0.01). The Disease Risk Index failed to predict survival. We built an “adapted Disease Risk Index” by modifying risks for myeloproliferative neoplasms and multiple myeloma that improved stratification ability for progression-free survival (P=0.04) but not for overall survival (P=0.82).     

Update on risk stratification and treatment of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma

Multiple myeloma is the second most common hematologic malignancy. Chromosomal aberrations are important prognostic determinants that influence the clinical decision-making in newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). Patients are considered high-risk if any of the following features are detected: hypodiploidy, deletion 13 by cytogenetics, t(4;14), t(14;16), t(14;20) and/or 17 p deletion. In the absence of these features patients are considered standard risk. Outside of trials, risk-adapted therapy in the transplant-eligible high-risk patients advocates use of bortezomib-based induction therapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and bortezomib-based maintenance therapy. High-risk, transplant-ineligible patients should also utilize bortezomib as initial therapy since it is known to overcome the poor prognosis associated with some high-risk features. The goal of therapy in high-risk patients is to attain and maintain a state of complete remission as much as possible. In contrast, the standard-risk, transplant-eligible patients may be treated with either lenalidomide–dexamethasone or bortezomib-based therapy followed by ASCT. In such patients, ASCT can also be deferred until first relapse if the patients are tolerating initial therapy well. Lenalidomide maintenance therapy in the post-transplant setting in standard-risk patients is controversial and not recommended routinely. For transplant-ineligible standard-risk patients, multiple options exist, although in the absence direct comparisons, we prefer lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone over melphalan-based combinations. This review outlines evidence-based management approaches in NDMM, with a focus on risk-adapted therapy.     

Lenalidomide before and after autologous stem cell transplantation for transplant-eligible patients of all ages in the randomized,phase III,Myeloma XI trial

The optimal way to use immunomodulatory drugs as components of induction and maintenance therapy for multiple myeloma is unresolved. We addressed this question in a large phase III randomized trial, Myeloma XI. Patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (n=2,042) were randomized to induction therapy with cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (CTD) or cyclophosphamide, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (CRD). Additional intensification therapy with cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (CVD) was administered before autologous stem-cell transplantation to patients with a suboptimal response to induction therapy using a response-adapted approach. After receiving high-dose melphalan with autologous stem cell transplantation, eligible patients were further randomized to receive either lenalidomide alone or observation alone. Co-primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The CRD regimen was associated with significantly longer PFS (median: 36 vs. 33 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.75-0.96; P=0.0116) and OS (3-year OS: 82.9% vs. 77.0%; HR, 0.77; 95% CI: 0.63-0.93; P=0.0072) compared with CTD. The PFS and OS results favored CRD over CTD across all subgroups, including patients with International Staging System stage III disease (HR for PFS, 0.73; 95% CI: 0.58-0.93; HR for OS, 0.78; 95% CI: 0.56-1.09), high-risk cytogenetics (HR for PFS, 0.60; 95% CI: 0.43-0.84; HR for OS, 0.70; 95% CI: 0.42-1.15) and ultra-high-risk cytogenetics (HR for PFS, 0.67; 95% CI: 0.41-1.11; HR for OS, 0.65; 95% CI: 0.34-1.25). Among patients randomized to lenalidomide maintenance (n=451) or observation (n=377), maintenance therapy improved PFS (median: 50 vs. 28 months; HR, 0.47; 95% CI: 0.37-0.60; P<0.0001). Optimal results for PFS and OS were achieved in the patients who received CRD induction and lenalidomide maintenance. The trial was registered with the EU Clinical Trials Register (EudraCT 2009-010956-93) and ISRCTN49407852.     

International Myeloma Working Group consensus approach to the treatment of multiple myeloma patients who are candidates for autologous stem cell transplantation

The role of high-dose therapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) continues to evolve in the novel agent era. The choice of induction therapy has moved from conventional chemotherapy to newer regimens incorporating the immunomodulatory derivatives thalidomide or lenalidomide and the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib. These drugs combine well with traditional therapies and with one another to form various doublet, triplet, and quadruplet regimens. Up-front use of these induction treatments, in particular 3-drug combinations, has affected unprecedented rates of complete response that rival those previously seen with conventional chemotherapy and subsequent ASCT. Autotransplantation applied after novel-agent-based induction regimens provides further improvement in the depth of response, a gain that translates into extended progression-free survival and, potentially, overall survival. High activity shown by immunomodulatory derivatives and bortezomib before ASCT has recently led to their use as consolidation and maintenance therapies after autotransplantation. Novel agents and ASCT are complementary treatment strategies for MM. This article reviews the current literature and provides important perspectives and guidance on the major issues surrounding the optimal current management of younger, transplantation-eligible MM patients.