Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy and anesthesia: a case series

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is an acquired autoimmune demyelinating polyneuropathy characterized by symmetrical diffuse weakness that also can rarely affect bulbar and respiratory muscles. The study objective was to describe perioperative outcomes of patients with CIDP who received general anesthesia. This retrospective observational study evaluated patients with active (diagnosed or treated within the previous year) CIDP who underwent general anesthesia at our institution between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2015. Medical records were reviewed for perioperative outcomes with emphasis on respiratory complications or unexpected reactions to muscle relaxants. Seventeen patients with CIDP underwent general anesthesia, of whom 16 had muscle weakness. Succinylcholine was used in 5 cases (29.4%) and nondepolarizing muscle relaxants in 11 cases (64.7%). Two patients required postoperative mechanical ventilation; one was critically ill and the other had open heart surgery. One patient had aspiration on the second postoperative day and required endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation for 3 days. Three patients had worsening CIDP symptoms: 1 acutely after surgery; 1 several months later; and 1 who died in the hospital. The patient who died underwent lengthy abdominal exploration, had acute worsening of neurologic symptoms, and died after 46 days of malnutrition. Anesthetic concerns of patients with CIDP include frailty, bulbar dysfunction, and the effects of immunosuppressive therapy. Although our patients tolerated neuromuscular drugs, substantial theoretical concerns with these medications in patients with demyelinating neuropathies preclude safety in this population without further study.     

Fatigue as the main presenting symptom of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: a study of 11 cases

Fatigue has been shown to be more frequent than previously thought in immune-mediated polyneuropathies. However, fatigue has not been reported as the main cause of referral in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) patients. Between January 2001 and December 2003, we investigated 11 patients referred for fatigue, for which we established a final diagnosis of CIDP. All patients had at least two clinical examinations including assessment of the fatigue severity scale (FSS) and one electrophysiological and laboratory work up. Additionally, 10 of the 11 patients had a nerve biopsy. There were 11 male patients. Mean age at onset was 53 +/- 11 years. Main cause of referral was fatigue in all patients. Additional symptoms included cramps (one case), distal paresthesias (six cases), limb pain (seven cases) and vasomotor disturbances (one case). Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis displayed a moderate increase in protein content in four patients. Electrophysiological analysis showed abnormalities in all patients. Among 11 patients, one fulfilled the American Academy of Neurology electrodiagnostic criteria for CIDP and three fulfilled the inflammatory neuropathy cause and treatment group or the Nicolas et al. criteria. In the eight remaining patients, a nerve biopsy confirmed the diagnosis of CIDP. Ten patients were treated, among which seven showed a significant improvement based on the FSS scale. This study shows that fatigue is a possible cause of referral for patients with CIDP and, like previous reports, emphasizes the lack of sensitivity of widely accepted electrophysiological criteria of CIDP. Long-term follow up of these patients is warranted to determine the prognosis of these minimal forms of CIDP and establish the best therapeutic strategy in such cases.     

The spectrum of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy

Research criteria for the diagnosis of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) were proposed by an Ad Hoc Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology (AAN) in 1991, and since then these criteria have been widely used in clinical studies. We have been impressed by the frequent finding of electrophysiological changes of a demyelinating neuropathy in patients whose clinical presentation does not conform to the usually accepted clinical phenotype of CIDP. To determine the clinical spectrum of CIDP, we conducted a retrospective review of patients of the peripheral electrophysiology laboratory of the University of Miami-Jackson Memorial Medical Center. Diagnostic criteria for acquired demyelination of an individual nerve were adapted from the AAN research criteria for the diagnosis of CIDP (1991). Patients were accepted for inclusion when such evidence was demonstrated in at least one motor nerve or at least two sensory nerves. We then reviewed the clinical phenotype and the underlying etiology of the neuropathy in these cases. Eighty-seven patients, 63 male and 24 female, age of onset 4-84 (mean 49.3) years, met these inclusion criteria. Forty-seven patients (54%) had distinct features outside the usual clinical presentation of CIDP. Of these, 15 (17%) had predominantly distal features, 13 (15%) had exclusively sensory polyneuropathy; seven (8%) had markedly asymmetric disease, seven (8%) had associated CNS demyelination, four (5%) had predominant cranial nerve involvement, and one (1%) had only the restless legs syndrome. An associated medical condition that may have been responsible for the acquired demyelinating neuropathy was present in 60% of the patients. We conclude that spectrum of CIDP is broader than would be indicated by the strict application of the AAN research criteria, and that many of the cases meeting more liberal criteria frequently respond to immunosuppressive therapy.     

Predicting response to treatment in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy

OBJECTIVE: To discover whether Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment Group (INCAT) electrophysiological criteria for demyelinating neuropathy predict response to immunotherapy in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP). METHODS: This was a retrospective case note study of patients who had attended Guy's Hospital Peripheral Nerve Clinic between January 2001 and March 2004, been diagnosed as having CIDP, and given treatment with corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg), or plasma exchange (PE). Patients' nerve conduction studies (NCS) were reviewed for evidence of demyelination and whether the abnormalities fulfilled modified INCAT electrophysiological criteria. Patients whose NCS fulfilled the criteria were assigned to the neurophysiologically definite CIDP group, while those that did not were labelled as neurophysiologically probable CIDP. Responses to any of the three immunotherapy agents were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Out of 50 patients, 27 (54%) were classified as neurophysiologically definite and 23 (46%) as neurophysiologically probable CIDP patients. Twenty (74%) neurophysiologically definite and 17 (73.9%) neurophysiologically probable CIDP patients responded to treatment. CONCLUSIONS: INCAT electrophysiological criteria did not predict a higher rate of response to immunotherapy. Neurophysiologically probable CIDP patients should be given a trial of immunotherapy.     

A study of three patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and a polyneuropathy resembling CIDP

We report three patients with a syndrome that fulfilled clinical and laboratory criteria for definite chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) who failed immunosuppressive treatment and eventually developed progressive amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Mean disease duration was 23 months (13-38) before death. Two patients had a family history of ALS without mutations of the SOD1 gene. Postmortem examination in one patient showed an endoneurial infiltration of mononuclear cells in lumbar roots and distal and proximal peripheral nerves, mainly around myelinated fibers, with demyelination and axonal loss, consistent with CIDP. The spinal cord revealed severe neuronal loss in the anterior horn, axonal loss in the corticospinal tract, and large numbers of phagocytes in the anterior and lateral tracts, indicative of ALS. Whether demyelinating polyneuropathy was coincident with ALS or was a cause or consequence of motor neuron degeneration in these patients remains to be elucidated. This unusual combination may provide an important clue in elucidating the pathogenesis of ALS in some patients.     

Response to immunosuppressive therapy in patients with hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy and associated dysimmune neuromuscular disorders

We encountered 2 patients with hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy (HMSN) type I who had marked weakness developing during several months superimposed on chronic peroneal muscular atrophy. Further studies disclosed a chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) in one patient and CIDP associated with polymyositis in the other. Both patients responded to prednisone and azathioprine with substantial improvement. Patients with HMSN who develop rapid progression of weakness should be evaluated for superimposed, potentially treatable dysimmune neuromuscular disorders.     

Sensory CIDP presenting as cryptogenic sensory polyneuropathy

The objective of this study was to report that patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) can present with a clinical picture of cryptogenic sensory neuropathy. Patients with distal sensory neuropathy and electrodiagnostic studies that are minimally abnormal or consistent with an axonal pathology are usually diagnosed as having cryptogenic sensory neuropathy if no cause for neuropathy can be found. Some of these patients, however, may have sensory CIDP. We reviewed the records of eight patients with CIDP, diagnosed by sural nerve biopsy, who presented with sensory neuropathy and electrodiagnostic studies that were minimally abnormal or revealed changes consistent with axonal neuropathy. All patients reported distal numbness and paresthesias and, on examination, had predominantly large fiber distal sensory loss and normal muscle strength. In most patients, deep tendon reflexes were reduced or absent. Sural nerve biopsies in all patients were consistent with chronic myelinopathy, with quantitative teased fiber analysis revealing segmental remyelination in 13-40% of the fibers. The four patients who received IVIg therapy had improved sensation and gait. Of the remaining four patients, one is being followed, one had spontaneous remission, one was lost to follow-up, and one, with contraindications to therapy, reported disease progression. Sensory CIDP may present as cryptogenic sensory polyneuropathy with normal or axonal electrophysiologic features. Sural nerve biopsy should be considered in patients with progressive, predominantly large fiber sensory neuropathy of otherwise unknown etiology, as they may have sensory CIDP that responds to therapy.     

Chronic acquired demyelinating symmetric polyneuropathy classified by pattern of weakness

OBJECTIVES: To study a representative group of patients with chronic acquired symmetric demyelinating polyneuropathies, and to evaluate classification by pattern of weakness and by presence of immunoglobulin monoclonal protein (M protein). METHODS: In Vest-Agder County, Norway, an unselected population of patients with chronic symmetric polyneuropathies who fulfill electrodiagnostic criteria for demyelination are registered in a database and followed up prospectively. Data were taken from the database on April 2, 2001. Patients with proximal as well as distal weakness were classified as having chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP), and patients with only distal symptoms as having distal acquired demyelinating symmetric polyneuropathy (DADS). RESULTS: A total of 29 patients had chronic acquired symmetric demyelinating polyneuropathy; 15 had CIDP and 14 had DADS. The 2 categories differed regarding spinal protein level (mean +/- SD, 0.102 +/- 0.060 g/dL in CIDP vs 0.065 +/- 0.029 g/dL in DADS; P =.05); clinical course (remitting in 6 of 13 patients with CIDP vs 0 of 14 with DADS; P =.02); disability score at diagnosis (mean +/- SD, 3.3 +/- 1.0 in CIDP vs 1.9 +/- 0.6 in DADS; P<.001) and at peak of symptoms (mean +/- SD, 3.6 +/- 1.1 in CIDP vs 2.3 +/- 0.6 in DADS; P<.001); and response to immunosuppressive treatment (11 of 12 patients with CIDP vs 2 of 7 with DADS; P =.01). An M protein was detected in 8 patients (3 with CIDP and 5 with DADS). Patients with polyneuropathy with and without M protein were similar in clinical features, course, disability, and treatment response. CONCLUSION: Classification by presence or absence of proximal weakness separates patients with chronic acquired symmetric demyelinating polyneuropathy into groups that are different in clinical course, disability, and treatment response.     

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy and respiratory failure

Neuromuscular respiratory failure is not considered to be a clinical feature of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP). We present 4 patients with CIDP who required respiratory assistance and mechanical ventilation. Two patients needed emergent intubation and one patient lapsed in a stupor from hypercapnia. Respiratory failure in CIDP should be considered exceptional, but more formal studies in CIDP may be needed to assess its prevalence.     

Autoantibody profile in a Malaysian cohort of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy

We report on our cohort of patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) who fulfilled the 2010 diagnostic criteria of CIDP. Patients were consecutively recruited and their demographics, clinical features and serological analysis of autoantibodies against neurofascin (NF)-155, NF-186, contactin-1 (CNTN1) and contactin-associated protein 1 were obtained. A total of 26 patients for which there was serologic testing were included: 22 typical CIDP, 3 distal CIDP and 1 multifocal CIDP. Of these, 2 patients had previously reported paranodal antibodies; one with autoantibodies IgG4 against NF155 and one with IgG4 against CNTN1. The patient with IgG4 anti-NF155 had young-onset, predominantly distal phenotype with associated tremor and sensory ataxia and poor response to intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). The patient with IgG4 anti-CNTN1 antibodies had a subacute onset, sensory ataxia, membranous nephropathy but responded poorly to IVIG. Autoimmune nodopathies represented 8% of our CIDP cohort. The clinical features and treatment response of patients with IgG4 anti-NF155 and anti-CNTN1 were similar to previous reports. Detecting the presence of autoimmune nodopathies was crucial in refining the diagnosis and determining the prognosis.     

CIDP‐like neuropathies in graft versus host disease

Cases of chronic inflammatory demyelinating poliradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) have been reported in hematopoietic stem cells transplantation complicated by graft versus host disease (GVHD). A systematic review of the CIDP‐like neuropathies associated with GVHD was conducted until January 2015, analyzing the clinical presentation and the response to different therapeutic regimens. Nineteen patients have been reported in literature including the present one. Fourteen subjects fulfilled the criteria for CIDP, whereas two cases presented with an asymmetric motor onset and one showed motor involvement only associated with anti‐ganglioside antibodies. In addition, two subjects already affected by CIDP developed a significant relapse after GVHD. This study reviews the literature data and reports one additional case of CIDP and GVHD, suggesting that the two clinical entities might share a similar immunological background.     

Treatment of immune-mediated, dysimmune neuropathies

This review focuses on the actual status and recent advances in the treatment of immune-mediated neuropathies, including: Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS) with its subtypes acute inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy, acute motor axonal neuropathy, acute motor and sensory axonal neuropathy, Miller Fisher syndrome, and acute pandysautonomia; chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) with its subtypes classical CIDP, CIDP with diabetes, CIDP/monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS), sensory CIDP, multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN), multifocal acquired demyelinating sensory and motor neuropathy or Lewis-Sumner syndrome, multifocal acquired sensory and motor neuropathy, and distal acquired demyelinating sensory neuropathy; IgM monoclonal gammopathies with its subtypes Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia, myelin-associated glycoprotein-associated gammopathy, polyneuropathy, organomegaly, endocrinopathy, M-protein, skin changes syndrome, mixed cryoglobulinemia, gait ataxia, late-onset polyneuropathy syndrome, and MGUS. Concerning the treatment of GBS, there is no significant difference between intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG), plasma exchange or plasma exchange followed by IVIG. Because of convenience and absent invasiveness, IVIG are usually preferred. In treating CIDP corticosteroids, IVIG, or plasma exchange are equally effective. Despite the high costs and relative lack of availability, IVIG are preferentially used. For the one-third of patients, who does not respond, other immunosuppressive options are available. In MMN IVIG are the treatment of choice. Inadequate response in 20% of the patients requires adjunctive immunosuppressive therapies. Neuropathies with IgM monoclonal gammopathy may respond to various chemotherapeutic agents, although the long-term effects are unknown. In addition, such treatment may be associated with serious side effects. Recent data support the use of rituximab, a monoclonal antibody against the B-cell surface-membrane-marker CD20.     

Diagnostic value of nerve biopsy for atypical chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: evaluation of eight cases

The diagnosis of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) relies primarily on clinical and electrophysiologic examination, but the nerve biopsy findings may be supportive, especially in atypical cases. In order to define the usefulness of nerve biopsy in this disease, we retrospectively studied 44 consecutive patients whom we classified as having CIDP on pathological grounds. We found that 8 of these 44 patients had pathological findings indicative of CIDP but did not meet any of the usually accepted electrophysiological criteria for its diagnosis. Among these eight patients, five responded favorably to conventional therapy. All of these eight patients had an electrophysiological pattern of generalized axonopathy with additional subtle findings suggestive of demyelination that prompted us to perform a nerve biopsy. Our data suggest that a significant number of patients with unrecognized CIDP are erroneously classified as having chronic idiopathic axonal polyneuropathy. CIDP should be suspected if the electrophysiological examination displays subtle abnormalities suggestive of demyelination, even in the presence of a prominent axonal pattern. Nerve biopsy in these patients may reveal abnormalities suggestive of CIDP and guide therapeutic options.     

Non‐anti‐MAG DADS neuropathy as a variant of CIDP: clinical,electrophysiological, laboratory features and response to treatment in 10 cases

Background and purpose: Some patients within the spectrum of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathies (CIDP) have distal acquired demyelinating symmetric (DADS) neuropathy, usually associated with anti‐myelin‐associated‐glycoprotein (MAG) IgM monoclonal gammopathy. The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate patients with DADS neuropathy without anti‐MAG antibodies, and study their response to immunotherapy. Methods: Patients were selected on the basis of (i) ‘Definite CIDP’ according to the EFNS/PNS Guideline criteria, (ii) The presence of disproportionately prolonged motor latencies resulting in a terminal latency index (TLI) ≤0.25 in at least two motor nerves and (iii) The absence of anti‐MAG antibodies on ELISA. Response to immunotherapy was defined as persistent improvement by at least one point on the INCAT disability score. Results: Data from 146 CIDP patients were analysed, and 10 patients were included. Six had clinically pure sensory neuropathy, and four had sensorimotor neuropathy. Ataxia was present in nine patients, generalized areflexia in seven and postural tremor in two. Five of the 10 patients had abnormal sensory potentials only in the upper limbs. An associated condition was found in nine patients: two chronic lymphocytic leukaemias, four IgG monoclonal gammopathies (one associated with non‐Hodgkin’s lymphoma) and two IgM monoclonal gammopathies of unknown significance. Patients were mostly improved with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg), corticosteroids, plasma exchanges, or a combination thereof. Conclusion: DADS neuropathy without anti‐MAG antibodies is more likely to be considered a variant of CIDP. In addition, such patients should be systematically investigated for an associated haematological or immunological condition.     

Visual evoked potentials study in chronic idiopathic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy.

BACKGROUND: The frequency of the association between chronic demyelinating inflammatory polyneuropathy (CIDP) and central nervous system (CNS) demyelinating lesions is probably underestimated. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the occurrence of combined central and peripheral demyelination in CIDP patients and to correlate visual evoked potential (VEP) abnormalities with CNS demyelinating lesions, observed on brain magnetic resonance imaging, and antibodies against glycolipids. METHODS: Nerve conduction studies, brain MRI and antibodies against glycolipids were prospectively studied in 17 patients who fulfilled the diagnostic criteria proposed for CIDP (Cornblath DR, Asbury AK, Albers JW, Feasby TE, Hahn AF, McLeod JG, Mendell JR, Parry GJ, Pollard JD, Thomas PK. Ad Hoc Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology AIDS Task Force. Research criteria for diagnosis of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. Neurology, 1991;41:617-618). VEPs were performed in each case before and after 6 months treatment with either intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) or steroids. RESULTS: Eight patients (47%) had increased latencies in at least one eye or showed increased interocular latency difference. Four patients (23%) presented a significant high signal intensity on T2-weighted brain MRI images. Of these 4 patients, 3 had prolonged VEP latency. Two patients with delayed VEP latency had antibodies against GM1, and SGLPG and anti-sulfatides, respectively. One patient with normal VEPs also had antibodies to GM1. VEP results were not significantly modified after treatment, either with steroids or IVIG. CONCLUSION: This study confirmed the high frequency of abnormal VEPs in CIDP patients, and found that they are poorly correlated with CNS demyelinating lesions and antibodies against glycolipids. The VEP abnormalities of these patients may be explained by the susceptibility to immune-mediated damage of both the peripheral nervous system and the optic nerve.     

Treatment of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy with methotrexate

We discovered many reports of other immunosuppressive drugs being used in adults with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) but none of methotrexate. As weekly low dose oral methotrexate is safe, effective, and well tolerated in other diseases, we treated 10 patients with otherwise treatment resistant CIDP. Seven showed improvement in strength by at least two points on the MRC sum score and three worsened. Only two showed an improvement in disability and both were also receiving corticosteroids. We discuss the difficulty of detecting an improvement in treatment resistant CIDP and propose methotrexate as a suitable agent for testing in a randomised trial.     

Chronic polyradiculoneuritis. 25 cases]

Twenty-five patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) were studied in order to define the clinical, biological, electrophysiological and pathological features of this disease. There were 11 men and 14 women ranging in age from 15 to 82 years. The average follow-up was 43 months. Patients fulfilled the criteria laid down by Dyck et al. (1975), except that progression of weakness was at least 2 months and not 6. Fourteen patients had a progressive course and 11 a relapsing one. Weakness was almost constant (24/25), sensory impairment was present in 22/25 with deep sensation predominantly impaired. Areflexia was observed in all patients. A history of previous infection or other possible precipitating event was given by 7 patients. Cerebrospinal fluid examination showed a raised total protein count in 22 cases. Electrophysiological examination revealed a slowing down of nerve conduction velocities to an extent compatible with a demyelinating process in 23 cases; 2 patients only had prolongation of F-waves. Sural nerve biopsy was less informative: inflammatory process--the most specific finding--was observed in only 3 out of 20 biopsies. Six patients had benign forms or spontaneous remission, the others were treated with corticosteroids or with immunosuppressive drugs. Most patients (64%) recovered very well. Only one died during the time of study. Eight other patients were treated with high-dose intravenous immunoglobulins and 4 of them improved with administrations at regular intervals to maintain the benefits observed. The occurrence of CIDP in association with other conditions is reviewed and we discuss its nosological position among the acquired demyelinating neuropathies.     

Pain as the presenting symptom of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP)

Numerous clinical forms of CIDP have been described, but pain is generally considered a rare or secondary sign. We describe here the clinical, electrophysiological and neuropathological characteristics of five patients with CIDP and pain as the main presenting symptom, and their course with treatment. Between January 2003 and December 2004, we selected five patients with prominent or isolated pain among 27 patients diagnosed with CIDP. All patients were subjected to clinical and electrophysiological examinations, and had a complete laboratory work up to exclude other causes of neuropathy. In view of the atypical clinical presentation, all five patients underwent nerve biopsy. There were two men and three women. The mean age at onset of neuropathy was 70+/-7.39 years. All patients initially presented with pain in the lower limbs associated with modest motor impairment (1 case), distal paresthesia (4 cases), cramps (1 case) and fatigue (2 cases). CSF was normal in three cases. On electrophysiological examination, three patients had nerve conduction abnormalities with subtle or clear signs of demyelination: three (case 1, 2 and 4) fulfilled the criteria of Rotta et al. and two (case 2 and 4) the criteria of both Nicolas et al and the INCAT group. Patients were all given symptomatic treatment and four patients received an immunomodulatory treatment, which was constantly effective. Pain may be a major and disabling symptom in patients with CIDP, so this diagnosis has to be considered in patients referred for a painful polyneuropathy. Moreover, immunomodulatory treatment has to be considered in such patients as symptomatic therapy may be ineffective.     

Motor chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) in 17 patients: Clinical characteristics,electrophysiological study,and response to treatment

Motor chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is a rare and poorly described subtype of CIDP. We aimed to study their clinical and electrophysiological characteristics and response to treatment. From a prospective database of CIDP patients, we included patients with definite or probable CIDP with motor signs and without sensory signs/symptoms at diagnosis. Patients were considered to have pure motor CIDP (PM‐CIDP) if sensory conductions were normal or to have motor predominant CIDP (MPred‐CIDP) if ≥2 sensory nerve action potential amplitudes were abnormal. Among the 700 patients with CIDP, 17 (2%) were included (PM‐CIDP n = 7, MPred‐CIDP n = 10); 71% were male, median age at onset was 48 years (range: 13‐76 years), 47% had an associated inflammatory or infectious disease or neoplasia. At the more severe disease stage, 94% of patients had upper and lower limb weakness, with distal and proximal weakness in 4 limbs for 56% of them. Three‐quarters (75%) responded to intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg) and four of five patients to corticosteroids including three of three patients with MPred‐CIDP. The most frequent conduction abnormalities were conduction blocks (CB, 82%) and F‐wave abnormalities (88%). During follow up, 4 of 10 MPred‐CIDP patients developed mild sensory symptoms; none with PM‐CIDP did so. Patients with PM‐CIDP had poorer outcome (median ONLS: 4; range: 22‐5) compared to MPred‐CIDP (2, range: 0‐4; P = .03) at last follow up. This study found a progressive clinical course in the majority of patients with motor CIDP as well as frequent associated diseases, CB, and F‐wave abnormalities. Corticosteroids might be considered as a therapeutic option in resistant IVIg patients with MPred‐CIDP.     

Alemtuzumab in the treatment of IVIG-dependent chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is an idiopathic immune mediated neuropathy causing demyelination and conduction block thought to occur as the result of an aberrant autoimmune response resulting in peripheral nerve inflammation mediated by T cells and humoral factors. Diagnosis commonly prompts initial treatment with steroids or intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) on which 5–35% subsequently become dependent to maintain function. Despite a number of small scale trials, the role for alternative long-term immunosuppression remains unclear. Alemtuzumab is a humanised monoclonal antibody targeting the CD52 antigen present on the surface of lymphocytes and monocytes. A single intravenous infusion results in rapid and profound lymphopoenia lasting >12 months. We report its use and clinical outcome in a small series of patients with severe IVIG-dependent CIDP. Seven patients (4 Males; 3 Females) who had failed to respond to conventional immunosuppression were treated in 5 centres receiving 9 courses of alemtuzumab (dose range 60–150 mg). Following treatment, mean monthly IVIG use fell 26% from 202 to 149 g and IVIG administration frequency from 22 to 136 days. Two patients had prolonged remission, two patients had a partial response and no clear benefit was observed in the remaining three patients (2 Males, 1 Females). Responding patients had a younger age at onset (19.5 years) and shorter disease duration than non-responders. Three patients developed autoimmune disease following treatment. Alemtuzumab may offer an alternative treatment for a subset of early onset IVIG dependent CIDP patients failing conventional immunosuppressive agents, but concerns about toxicity may limit its use.