Anorectal manometry and defecography in the diagnosis of fecal incontinence.

We carried out anorectal manometry and defecography prospectively in 43 consecutive patients with fecal incontinence. A subgroup of 17 patients with severe incontinence was identified radiologically by a short and incompletely closed anal canal. In these patients, the anal resting pressure was significantly lower than in the rest of the group (34.9 +/- 11.4 mm Hg versus 60.0 +/- 25.7 mm Hg, respectively; p less than 0.01). The anorectal angle did not change in 24 patients during squeezing, indicating a dysfunction of the puborectalis muscle. Manometric data did not differ between this subgroup and patients with a more acute anorectal angle during voluntary sphincter contraction. This indicates that the anal pressures recorded manometrically do not reflect the function of a muscular component that is important in the maintenance of fecal continence. We conclude that anorectal manometry and defecography are complementary diagnostic tools in the investigation of patients with fecal incontinence.     

Can three-dimensional endoanal ultrasonography detect external anal sphincter atrophy? A comparison with endoanal magnetic resonance imaging

PURPOSE: Anal sphincter atrophy is associated with a poor clinical outcome of sphincter repair in patients with faecal incontinence. Preoperative assessment of the sphincters is therefore relevant. External anal sphincter (EAS) atrophy can be detected by endoanal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), but not by conventional endoanal ultrasonography (EUS). Three-dimensional EUS allows multiplanar imaging of the anal sphincters and thus enables more reliable anal sphincter measurements. The aim of the present study was to establish whether 3D EUS measurements can be used to detect EAS atrophy. For this purpose 3D EUS measurements were compared with endoanal MRI measurements. METHODS: Patients with symptoms of faecal incontinence underwent 3D EUS and endoanal MRI. Internal anal sphincter (IAS) and EAS defects were assessed on 3D EUS and endoanal MRI. EAS atrophy was determined on endoanal MRI. The following measurements were performed: EAS length, thickness and area. Furthermore, EAS volume was determined on 3D EUS and compared with EAS thickness and area measured on endoanal MRI. RESULTS: Eighteen parous women (median age 56 years, range 32-80) with symptoms of faecal incontinence were included. Agreement between 3D EUS and endoanal MRI was 61% for IAS defects and 88% for EAS defects. EAS atrophy was seen in all patients on endoanal MRI. Correlation between the two methods for EAS thickness, length and area was poor. In addition, correlation was also poor for EAS volume determined on 3D EUS, and EAS thickness and area measured on endoanal MRI. CONCLUSION: Three-dimensional EUS and endoanal MRI are comparable for detecting EAS defects. However, correlation between the two methods for EAS thickness, length and area is poor. This is also the case for EAS volume determined on 3D EUS and EAS thickness and area measured on endoanal MRI. Three-dimensional EUS can be used for detecting EAS defects, but no 3D EUS measurements are suitable parameters for assessing EAS atrophy.     

Endoluminal ultrasound is preferable to electromyography in mapping anal sphincteric defects

Assessment of complex sphincteric defects in patients with fecal incontinence by digital rectal examination and intraoperative dissection can be difficult in the presence of excessive scarring. Adjunctive investigation such as endoluminal ultrasound (ELUS) and needle electromyography (EMG) may provide objective evidence of the nature and extent of the sphincteric defects. In a series of 11 patients, ELUS of the anal canal with a 10-MHz transducer (focal zone of 1–4 cm) accurately detected defects in the external anal sphincter (EAS) in seven of seven patients, defects in the internal anal sphincter (IAS) in eight of eight patients, and integrity of both sphincters in two patients. These findings were confirmed by needle EMG of the EAS alone in five patients, by operative findings at a perineal sphincteroplasty operation in six patients, and by both in two patients. ELUS was associated with less pain than was needle EMG (pain score 4vs. 10, 10 being most painful) and provided high-resolution radial images of both the EAS and the IAS. Thus, ELUS seems preferable to EMG in mapping anal sphincteric defects and can be a useful anatomic adjunct to physiologic studies of anorectal function in patients with fecal incontinence.Read at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Chicago, Illinois, May 2 to 7, 1993.     

Anal endosonography and manometry

PURPOSE: Correlations between anal sphincter function as assessed by anorectal manometry and anal sphincter anatomy measured by endoluminal ultrasound have been reported in the literature both for patients and for healthy individuals but have not been confirmed by other authors. METHODS: For a larger series of patients (152 consecutive patients, mean age 54.1±15.5 years; female:male ratio, 11141) with anorectal dysfunctions such as incontinence (n=92), constipation (n=37), and other symptoms (n=23), diagnostic work-up included conventional multilumen anorectal manometry to evaluate internal sphincter pressure at rest, maximum external sphincter squeeze pressure during contraction, and endoanal sonography to determine anal sphincter integrity and to measure dorsal, left lateral, and right lateral diameter of the internal anal sphincter (IAS) and external anal sphincter (EAS) muscles. RESULTS: Maximum squeeze pressure was significantly correlated to muscle thickness of the EAS(P =0.001). No association was found between resting pressure and IAS diameter. Women had significantly lower resting and squeeze pressures than men(P =0.008 and P =0.003, respectively), but age-related changes of function were only found for resting pressure. Endosonographic values of IAS and EAS did not differ between genders but were significantly correlated with age(P =0.008 and P =0.02, respectively). Because all correlations were rather weak, they only can explain a small portion of data variance. CONCLUSION: Anal manometry and anal ultrasound, therefore, are of complementary value and are both indicated in adequate clinical problems.Supported by a grant from Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, En 50/10, Bonn, Germany.     

Do internal anal sphincter defects decrease the success rate of anal sphincter repair?

Background Anatomic anal sphincter defects can involve the internal anal sphincter (IAS), the external anal sphincter (EAS), or both muscles. Surgical repair of anteriorly located EAS defects consists of overlapping suture of the EAS or EAS imbrication; IAS imbrication can be added regardless of whether there is IAS injury. The aim of this study was to assess the functional outcome of anal sphincter repair in patients intraoperatively diagnosed with combined EAS/IAS defects compared to patients with isolated EAS defects. Methods The medical records of patients who underwent anal sphincter repair between 1988 and 2000 and had follow-up of at least 3 months were retrospectively assessed. Fecal incontinence was assessed using the Cleveland Clinic Florida incontinence score wherein 0 equals perfect continence and 20 is associated with complete incontinence. Postoperative scores of 0–10 were interpreted as success whereas scores of 11–20 indicated failure. Results A total of 131 women were included in this study, including 38 with combined EAS/IAS defects (Group I) and 93 with isolated EAS defects (Group II). Thirty-three patients (87%) in Group I had imbrication of a deficient IAS, compared to 83 patients (89%) in Group II. All patients had either overlapping EAS repair (n=121) or EAS imbrication (n=10). Mean follow-up was 30.9 months (range, 3–131 months). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups relative to age (48.3 vs. 53.0 years; p=0.14), preoperative incontinence score (16.1 vs. 16.7; p=0.38), extent of pudendal nerve terminal motor latency pathology (left, 11.1% vs. 8%; p=0.58; right, 8.6% vs. 15.1%; p=0.84), extent of pathology at electromyography (54.8% vs. 60.1%; p=0.43), and length of follow-up (26.9 vs. 32.5 months; p=0.31). The success rates of sphincter repair were 68.4% for Group I versus 55.9% for Group II (p=NS). Both groups were well matched for incidence of IAS imbrication as well as age, follow-up interval, and physiologic parameters. The success rates of anal sphincter repair were not statistically significant between the two groups. Conclusion A pre-existing IAS defect does not preclude successful sphincteroplasty as compared to repair of an isolated EAS defect. Thus, patients with combined anal sphincter defects should not be considered as poor candidates for sphincter repair. Presented in part at the annual meeting of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, 2–5 July 2002, Manchester, UK.     

Simultaneous Endoluminal Sonography and Manometry to Assess Anal Sphincter Complex in Normal Subjects

The purpose of this study was to usesimultaneous anal manometry and high-frequencyendoluminal ultrasonography (EUS) to determine therelationship between resting anal pressure andcross-sectional area of the internal and external anal sphincters.Eleven normal subjects underwent simultaneous anal EUSand manometry using catheters containing both pressureports and ultrasound transducers. Resting pressure and cross-sectional area of the sphincters weremade throughout the anal sphincter complex. The lengthof the internal anal sphincter (IAS) by sonography (27± 5 mm) was significantly less than the length of the high pressure zone (HPZ) by manometry(44 ± 8 mm; P < 0.001). Maximum IAScross-sectional area (CSA) occurred 10 ± 6 mmproximal to the peak resting pressure. The resting analpressure correlated with external anal sphincter (EAS) CSA (r =0.77), but not with IAS CSA (r = –0.17). The sumof EAS CSA and IAS CSA correlated strongly with restingpressure (r = 0.85). In conclusion, the IAS is shorter than the HPZ, with a significant distanceseparating maximum IAS CSA from peak resting pressure.The sum of the IAS and EAS CSAs, but not that of the IASalone, correlated with resting pressure. Thus, this study suggests that the EAS, in addition to theIAS, contributes to resting anal pressure.     

Usefulness of anorectal and endovaginal 3D ultrasound in the evaluation of sphincter and pubovisceral muscle defects using a new scoring system in women with fecal incontinence after vaginal delivery

Purpose

This study aims to evaluate pubovisceral muscle and anal sphincter defects in women with previous vaginal delivery and fecal incontinence and to correlate the findings with the severity of symptoms using the combined anorectal and endovaginal 3D ultrasonography with a new ultrasound scoring system.

Methods

Consecutive female patients with previous vaginal delivery and fecal incontinence symptoms were screened. Fecal incontinence was assessed with the Cleveland Clinic Florida fecal incontinence scale, and the extent of defects was assessed by an ultrasound score based on results of anorectal and endovaginal 3D ultrasound. Fecal incontinence was assessed with the Cleveland Clinic Florida fecal incontinence scale.

Results

Of 84 women with previous vaginal delivery and fecal incontinence, 21 (25%) had intact pubovisceral muscles and anal sphincters; 63 (75%) had a pubovisceral muscle or anal sphincter defect, or both. Twenty-eight (33%) had a pubovisceral muscle defect [23% with an external anal sphincter (EAS) defect or combined EAS/internal anal sphincter defects; 11% with intact anal sphincters]. Thirty-five (42%) had intact pubovisceral muscles and an anal sphincter defect. Compared with women with intact pubovisceral muscles/anal sphincter defects, patients with pubovisceral muscle defects had significantly higher incontinence scores and significantly higher ultrasound scores indicating more extensive defects. Incontinence symptoms correlated positively with the ultrasound score, measurements of sphincter defects, and area of the levator hiatus.

Conclusions

Evaluation of both pubovisceral muscles and anal sphincters is important to identify defects and determine treatment for women with fecal incontinence after vaginal delivery. The severity of fecal incontinence symptoms is significantly related to the extent of defects of the pubovisceral muscles and anal sphincters.

     

Clinical, anorectal manometry and surface electromyography in the study of patients with fecal incontinence.

OBJECTIVE: to demonstrate the role of the clinical, anorectal manometry and surface electromyography in the assessment of patients with fecal incontinence. PATIENTS AND METHODS: ninety-three patients with fecal incontinence are retrospectively reviewed and the data obtained from the directed clinical history, physical examination of the anal region, digital rectal examination, anorectal manometry and surface electromyography are analyzed. A treatment was administered in accordance with the alterations encountered and the results evaluated at 3 and 12 months. RESULTS: fecal incontinence was predominant (91.4%) in women age 59.7+/-11. A background of obstetric risks (48.2%) was frequent in women. Also, 73.1% of the patients presented diarrhea. The anorectal manometry (ARM) demonstrated some alterations in 90.3% of the patients, whereas a hypotonic sphincter was the most common finding (85.7%). Rectal sensitivity or distensibility alterations were present in the rest of the patients. In 79.2% ofthe cases, hypotonic sphincter was associated with rectal sensitivity or distensibility alterations. In 65.2% of patients with hypotonic external anal sphincter, damage of the pudendal nerve was found and therefore biofeedback was indicated in 41.9% of them. CONCLUSIONS: the clinical study of the patients, together with the anorectal manometry and surface electromyography enables the identification of the cause of FI and its treatment. These studies demonstrate that in most cases the origin of the incontinence is due to multiple etiologies, however the treatment of some of the factors involved frequently improves the symptomatology.     

Quantifying the extent of fistulotomy. How much sphincter can we safely divide? A three-dimensional endosonographic study

Purpose

To quantify the longitudinal division of the internal anal sphincter (IAS) and external anal sphincter (EAS) after fistulotomy using three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound (3D-EAUS) and correlate the results with postoperative faecal incontinence.

Methods

A prospective, consecutive study was performed from December 2008 to October 2010. All patients underwent 3D-EAUS before and 8?weeks after surgery. Thirty-six patients with simple perianal fistula were included. Patients with an intersphincteric or low transphincteric fistula (<66% sphincter involved) without risk factors for incontinence underwent fistulotomy. The outcome measures were the longitudinal extent of division of the IAS and EAS in relation to total sphincter length and continence (Jorge and Wexner scores).

Results

One-year follow-up revealed a 0% recurrence rate. There was a strong correlation between preoperative 3D-EAUS measurement of fistula height with intraoperative and postoperative 3D-EAUS measurement of IAS and EAS division (p?p?>?0.05).

Conclusions

In patients without risk factors, division of the EAS during fistulotomy limited to the lower two thirds of the EAS is associated with excellent continence and cure rates.     

Anorectal sphincter function and rectal barostat study in patients following transanal endoscopic microsurgery

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: This study evaluated the effect of transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) on anorectal sphincter functions and determined the risk factors for anorectal dysfunctions (including incontinence). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A study group of 33 patients with small, mobile rectal tumors (adenoma and carcinoma) located up to 12 cm from the anal verge underwent anorectal motility studies (using pull-through anorectal manometry and rectal barostat) and endoanal ultrasound prior to surgery and 3 weeks and 6 months after TEM; controls were 20 healthy volunteers. RESULTS: Resting and squeeze anal pressures were reduced 3 weeks after TEM. Resting anal pressure remained reduced 6 months after surgery; the changes were related to low preoperative levels and to the internal anal sphincter defects rather than to the procedure duration or the type of surgery. High-pressure zone length and vector volume were decreased 3 weeks after TEM and restored 6 months later. Rectoanal inhibitory reflex, reflex sphincter contraction, rectoanal pressure gradients, threshold and maximal tolerable volume of rectal sensitivity, and compliance were significantly changed 3 weeks after TEM; only rectal wall compliance remained low at 6 months. The rectoanal inhibitory reflex, reflex sphincter contraction, rectal sensitivity, and compliance were related to the extent and type of excision (partial or full thickness). Anal ultrasound revealed internal anal sphincter defects in 29% of patients studied 3 weeks after TEM. Only 76% of patients were fully continent. Disturbed anorectal function (including partial fecal incontinence) was observed in up to 50% of patients at 3 weeks. Partial and moderate anorectal dysfunction was found in 21% patients 6 months after surgery. The main risk factors of anorectal dysfunctions following TEM included: postoperative internal anal sphincter defects, low preoperative resting anal pressure, disturbed rectoanal coordination, extent (>50% of wall circumference) and the depth (full thickness) of tumor excision. CONCLUSION: TEM has a relevant but temporary effect on anorectal motility. As a result of TEM procedures 21% of the patients had disturbed anorectal functions, mostly due to the extent or depth of tumor excision (influencing rectal compliance and rectoanal coordination), and to the sphincter defects lowering resting anal pressure. Preoperative anorectal motility studies and anal ultrasound allow the identification of patients with the risk of postoperative anorectal dysfunctions.     

Biofeedback training in patients with fecal incontinence

PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to assess the functional results of biofeedback training in patients with fecal incontinence in relation to clinical presentation and anorectal manometry results. METHODS: Twenty-six consecutive patients with fecal incontinence were treated with biofeedback training using anorectal manometry pressure for visual feedback. Ten patients had passive incontinence only, six patients had urge incontinence, and ten patients had combined passive and urge incontinence. RESULTS: Patients with urge incontinence had a lower maximum voluntary contraction pressure (92 ± 12 mmHg) and lower maximum tolerable volume (78 ± 13 ml) than patients with passive incontinence (140 ± 43 mmHg and 166 ± 73 ml). Twenty-two patients completed the treatment, five patients (23 percent) showed excellent improvement, nine patients (41 percent) had good results, and eight (36 percent) patients showed no improvement. At follow-up on average of 21 months after therapy, 41 percent of our patients reported continued improvement. The maximum tolerable volume was higher in those with excellent (140.4 ± 6.8 ml) or good (156.3 ± 6.64 ml) results of therapy than it was in those with poor results (88.5 ± 2.5 ml). Greater asymmetry of the anal sphincter also correlated to poor results. CONCLUSION: Biofeedback therapy improved continence immediately after training and at follow-up after 21 months, but the initial results were better. The urge fecal incontinence seems to be related to function of the external anal sphincter and to the maximum tolerable volume. Low maximum tolerable volume and anal sphincter asymmetry were associated with a poor outcome of therapy     

Use of vector volume manometry and endoanal magnetic resonance imaging in the adult female for assessment of anal sphincter dysfunction

PURPOSE: This study compared conventional water-perfused and vector volume anal manometry in female patients with neurogenic fecal incontinence and chronic anal fissure and in healthy female volunteers. We used endoanal magnetic resonance (MR) imaging to measure internal and external sphincter lengths and thicknesses and contrasted these with the manometric findings in the different anorectal conditions. METHODS: One hundred thirty-three female subjects were studied over an eight-month period, including 33 control volunteers, 83 patients with neurogenic fecal incontinence, and 17 patients with chronic anal fissure. Conventional manometry was contrasted with automated vector volume-derived parameters. Endoanal magnetic resonance images were obtained using a previously described internal coil with a 0.5 T Asset scanner measuring quadrantal internal sphincter thickness and averaged coronal internal and external sphincter lengths. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant relationship between parameters measured by conventional manometry and those variables derived from vector volume manometry at rest and squeeze. There was no difference in sectorial vector-derived pressures within any anorectal condition and no correlation between quadrantal internal sphincter thickness measurements and sectorial pressures at rest. Patients with chronic anal fissure and neurogenic fecal incontinence had constitutionally shorter superficial and subcutaneous external sphincters than healthy control subjects (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: There is no association between manometric findings and morphologic sphincter measurement; however, the shorter distal external sphincter in patients with fissure might render the lower anal canal relatively unsupported after internal sphincterotomy in the female patient.Poster presentation at the meeting of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, Jersey, United Kingdom, June 29 to July 1, 1998.     

Role of manometry, defecography and anal endosonography in the evaluation of colorectal disorders.

OBJECTIVE: altered motility or anatomy of the rectum, anus and perineal floor may lead to symptoms which are unresponsive to routine therapeutic approaches. These disturbances usually lead to constipation, fecal incontinence, or both. Different tests and techniques for evaluating anorectal and perineal disorders, developed in the last two decades, make a better understanding of these disorders possible. This study was designed to evaluate the diagnostic benefits of combining manometry, defecography and anal endosonography in the assessment of patients with anorectal disorders. METHODS: twenty-five children with constipation (with or without soiling), incontinence and/or prolapse underwent anal manometry, defecography and anal endosonography. Group A consisted of 9 children with fecal incontinence, group B consisted of 10 children with constipation with soiling, and group C comprised 6 children with constipation without soiling. RESULTS: in group A resting incontinence was associated with a hypotonic external sphincter in 4 out of 9 patients, 2 of whom had internal anal sphincter thinning. In group B resting incontinence was associated with a hypotonic external sphincter in 8 out of 10 patients, 6 of whom had internal anal sphincter thinning. In group C these associations were not seen in any of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: barium enema is not sufficient for an accurate diagnosis of anorectal disorders. No single test is capable of revealing the type of disease. Anal manometry, defecography and endosonography are complementary procedures in the assessment of this group of disorders. This new approach will improve our knowledge of the pathogenesis of these disorders in children. However, further studies are needed to obtain conclusive evidence.     

Sensory and motor function in the maintenance of anal continence

Anorectal function was prospectively evaluated in 43 consecutive patients with fecal incontinence and in 19 healthy volunteers using manometry and electrical stimulation of the anoderm. Both anorectal motor and sensory function was impaired in incontinent patients as compared with healthy controls. Further statistical analysis identified four subgroups of patients showing different pathomechanisms of fecal incontinence: severe combined anorectal motor and sensory dysfunction, isolated anal sphincter dysfunction, isolated anorectal sensory dysfunction, and combined dysfunction of the internal anal sphincter and impaired anorectal sensitivity. These data support the hypothesis that sensory function of both the rectum and the anal canal is an important and independent factor in the preservation of continence.     

The role of sphincteroplasty for fecal incontinence reevaluated: A prospective physiologic and functional review

Sixteen female patients (mean age 54.1 years; range 34–74 years) with a 9.8-year (range 1–25 years) history of incontinence to solid stool underwent overlapping sphincteroplasty with internal sphincter imbrication without fecal diversion. All patients were prospectively evaluated with preoperative anorectal manometry, electromyography, and pudendal nerve motor latency assessment, postoperative anorectal manometry, and preoperative and postoperative functional evaluation. Mean and maximal resting pressures increased from 30 mm Hg and 49 mm Hg preoperatively to 40 mm Hg and 57 mm Hg, respectively, postoperatively. Likewise, mean and maximal squeeze pressures increased from 27 mm Hg and 48 mm Hg preoperatively to 39 mm Hg and 73 mm Hg, respectively, postoperatively (P<0.01). Furthermore, anal canal high pressure zone length was increased by sphincteroplasty from a mean of 0.9 cm (range 0–3 cm) to a mean of 2.1 cm (range 1–4 cm). These objective physiologic improvements correlated well with subjective functional improvement. Subjectively, functional outcome was rated by patients as excellent in 38 percent, good in 38 percent, fair in 19 percent, and poor in only 5 percent of cases. Overlapping sphincteroplasty with internal sphincter imbrication improves both the anal sphincter physiologic profile and fecal continence.Read at the meeting of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, St. Louis, Missouri, April 29–May 4, 1990.This paper received the Midwest Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Award.     

Significance of the Thickness of the Anal Sphincters with Age and Its Relevance in Faecal Incontinence

Papachrysostomou M, Pye SD, Wild SR, Smith AN. Significance of the thickness of the anal sphincters with age and its relevance in faecal incontinence. Scand 1 Gastroenterol 1994;29:710-714.

Background: Ultrasonographic studies in healthy volunteers showed that the external anal sphincter (EAS) and internal anal sphincter (IAS) thicknesses were inversely related at rest. The functional importance of the two sphincters in continence control was demonstrated in the relationship between the sum of the thicknesses of the two sphincters and the anal canal resting pressure. The aims of the present study were to assess the morphometric appearance of the anal sphincters by endosonography in faecally incontinent patients and to contrast this with that of older healthy subjects. Methods: Twenty-eight female patients with neurogenic faecal incontinence (FI) were studied. An older group of 7 healthy women, aged 41-75 years, and a young group of 11 nulliparous healthy women, aged 20-23 years, served as control groups. Anal endosonography was performed with a radial rotating endoprobe, with the subject in the left lateral position. Conventional anal manometry was performed in all subjects. Results: The EAS in the FI group was thicker than the EAS in the old (p < 0.04) but did not differ from the EAS in the young. The IAS thickness in the FI group did not differ from that in the older group. In both these groups the IAS was thicker than in the young women (p < 0.01). The anal pressures in the FI group were reduced compared with the normal groups (p < 0.04). There was a direct relationship between the two sphincters in FI (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The increased thickness of the IAS in the FI group does not seem to compensate for function and results in a failure of the sphincter mechanism to maintain continence, whereas in healthy elderly subjects the increased IAS thickness appears to be compensatory and important for continence control.     

Anorectal dysfunction and rectal prolapse in progressive systemic sclerosis

Our aim was to characterize the clinical spectrum of anorectal dysfunction among eight patients with progressive systemic sclerosis (PSS) who presented with altered bowel movements with or without fecal incontinence. The anorectum was assessed by physical examination, proctosigmoidoscopy, and anorectal manometry. There was concomitant involvement of the other regions of the digestive tract in all patients as determined by barium studies, endoscopy, or manometry: eight esophageal, three gastric, four small bowel, and two colonic. Seven patients had fecal incontinence, and four also had second-degree complete rectal prolapse. Abnormal anorectal function, particularly abnormal anal sphincter resting pressures, were detected in all patients; anal sphincter pressures were lower in those with rectal prolapse. Rectal capacity and wall compliance were impaired in seven of seven patients. Successful surgical correction of prolapse in three patients resulted in restoration of incontinence for six months and seven years in two of the three patients. We conclude that rectal dysfunction and weakness of the anal sphincters are important factors contributing, respectively, to altered bowel movements and fecal incontinence in patients with gastrointestinal involvement by PSS. Rectal prolapse worsens anal sphincter dysfunction and should be sought routinely as it is a treatable factor aggravating fecal incontinence in patients with PSS.This work was presented in part at the Annual Meeting of the American Gastroenterological Association, May 1992, and appears in abstract form in Gastroenterology 1992;102:A473.Supported in part by the General Clinical Research Center Grant 00585 from the National Institutes of Health.     

Anorectal pressure gradient and rectal compliance in fecal incontinence

To study whether anorectal pressure gradients discriminated better than standard anal manometry between patients with fecal incontinence and subjects with normal anal function, anorectal pressure gradients were measured during rectal compliance measurements in 36 patients with fecal incontinence and in 22 control subjects. Anal and rectal pressures were measured simultaneously during the rectal compliance measurements. With standard anal manometry, 75% of patients with fecal incontinence had maximal resting pressure within the normal range, and 39% had maximum squeeze pressure within the normal range. Anorectal pressure gradients did not discriminate better between fecal incontinence and normal anal function, since, depending on the parameters used, 61%–100% of the incontinent patients had anorectal pressure gradients within the normal range. Patients with fecal incontinence had lower rectal volumes than controls at constant defecation urge (median 138 ml and 181 ml, P<0.05) and at maximal tolerable volume (median 185 ml and 217 ml, P<0.05). We conclude that measurements of anorectal pressure gradients offer no advantage over standard anal manometry when comparing patients with fecal incontinence to controls. Patients with fecal incontinence have a lower rectal volume tolerability than control subjects with normal anal function. Accepted: 5 June 1998     

Critical reappraisal of anorectal function tests in patients with faecal incontinence who have failed conservative treatment

Objective

Anorectal function tests are often performed in patients with faecal incontinence who have failed conservative treatment. This study was aimed to establish the additive value of performing anorectal function tests in these patients in selecting them for surgery.

Patients and methods

Between 2003 and 2009, all referred patients with faecal incontinence were assessed by a questionnaire, anorectal manometry and anal endosonography. Patients with diarrhea, inflammatory bowel disease, pouches or rectal carcinoma were excluded.

Results

In total, 218 patients were evaluated. Of these, 107 (49%) patients had no sphincter defects, 71 (33%) had small defects and 40 (18%) had large defects. Anorectal manometry could not differentiate between patients with and without sphincter defects. Patients with sphincter defects were only found to have a significantly shorter sphincter length and reduced rectal capacity compared to patients without sphincter defects. Forty-three patients (20%) had a normal anal pressures ≥40?mmHg. Seventeen patients (8%) had also a dyssynergic pelvic floor both on clinical examination and anorectal manometry. Fifteen patients (7%) had a reduced rectal capacity between 65 and 100?ml. There was no difference in anal pressures or the presence of sphincter defects in these patients compared to patients with a rectal capacity >150?ml. There was no correlation between anorectal manometry, endosonography and faecal incontinence severity scores.

Conclusion

In patients with faecal incontinence who have failed conservative treatment, only anal endosonography can reveal sphincter defects. Anorectal manometry should be reserved for patients eligible for surgery to exclude those with suspected dyssynergic floor or reduced rectal capacity.     

Clinical presentation of fecal incontinence and anorectal function: what is the relationship?

OBJECTIVES: Fecal incontinence is classified into various types: passive, urge, and combined. Its clinical presentation is thought to be related to the underlying physiological or anatomical abnormality. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the associations between the frequency of clinical symptoms and anatomic and functional characteristics of the anorectum of patients with severe fecal incontinence. METHODS: Associations were explored in a consecutive series of 162 patients (91% women, mean age 59 [SD +/- 12] yr) with a mean Vaizey incontinence score of 18 (SD +/- 3). RESULTS: Urge incontinence was reported as "daily" by 55%, "often" by 27%, and "sometimes" by 7% of all patients. No significant associations were observed between the frequency of urge incontinence and either manometric data, anal mucosal sensitivity testing, or defects of internal anal sphincter (IAS) or external anal sphincter (EAS). A significant relation was observed between the frequency of urge incontinence and maximal tolerable volume (P= 0.03) and atrophy of the EAS (P= 0.05). Passive incontinence was reported as "daily" by 14%, "often" by 30%, and "sometimes" by 14% of all patients. Resting and maximal squeeze pressure were both associated (P < 0.001) with the frequency of passive incontinence. No relationship could be detected between clinical presentation and rectal sensation, anal mucosal sensitivity, defects, or atrophy of IAS or EAS. CONCLUSION: Most patients reported combined incontinence (59%) and underlying pathophysiologic abnormalities were identified. The hypothesized associations between urge and passive incontinence and functional and anatomical impairment of the anorectum are less clear-cut than previously assumed. Patients presenting with fecal incontinence should undergo physiologic investigation.