Effect of an emergency department intensive care unit on medical intensive unit admissions and care: A retrospective cohort study

ObjectiveEvaluate the impact of an emergency critical care center (EC3) on the admissions of critically ill patients to a critical care medicine unit (CCMU) and their outcomes.MethodsThis was a retrospective before/after cohort study in a tertiary university teaching hospital. To improve the care of critically ill patients in the emergency department (ED), a 9-bed EC3 was opened in the ED in February 2015. All critically ill patients in the emergency department must receive intensive support in EC3 before being considered for admission to the CCMU for further treatment. Patients from the emergency department account for a significant proportion of the patients admitted to the CCMU. The proportions of patients admitted to the CCMU from the ED were analyzed 1 year before and 1 year after the opening of the EC3. We also compared the admission data, demographic data, APACHE III scores and patient outcomes among patients admitted from ED to the CCMU in the year before and the year after the opening of the EC3.ResultThe establishment of the EC3 was associated with a decreased proportion of patients admitted to the CCMU from the ED (OR 0.73 95% CI 0.63–0.84, p < 0.01), a decrease in the proportion of patients with sepsis admitted from the ED (OR 0.68, 95% CI, 0.54–0.87, p < 0.01) and a decrease in the proportion of patients with gastrointestinal bleeding admitted from the ED (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.28–0.84, p < 0.05). Following the establishment of the EC3, patients admitted to the CCMU had a higher APACHE III score in 2015 (74.85 ± 30.42 vs 72.39 ± 29.64, p = 0.015). Fewer low-risk patients were admitted to the CCMU for monitoring following the opening of the EC3 (112 [6.8%] vs. 181 [9.3%], p < 0.01). Propensity score matching analysis showed that the opening of the EC3 was associated with improved 60-day survival (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.70–0.99, p = 0.046).ConclusionFollowing the opening of the EC3, the proportion of CCMU admissions from the ED decreased. The EC3 may be most effective at reducing the admission of lower-acuity patients with GI bleeding and possibly sepsis. The EC3 may be associated with improved survival in ED patients.     

Predicting 30 – Day outcomes in emergency department patients discharged with COVID-19

IntroductionDetermining disposition for COVID-19 patients can be difficult for emergency medicine clinicians. Previous studies have demonstrated risk factors which predict severe infection and mortality however little is known about which risk factors are associated with failure of outpatient management and subsequent admission for COVID-19 patients.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective observational chart review of patients who had a confirmed positive COVID-19 test collected during an ED visit between March 1, 2020 and October 11, 2020. Patients were divided into two groups based on presence or absence of a subsequent 30-day hospitalization. Clinical and demographic information were collected including chief complaint, triage vital signs and comorbid medical conditions.Results1038 patients were seen and discharged from a network ED with a positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR test. 94 patients (9.1%) were admitted to a hospital within 30 days of the index ED visit while 944 (90.9%) were not admitted to a network hospital within 30 days. Patients that were admitted were more likely to be older (aOR = 1.04 (95% CI 1.03–1.06)), hypoxic (aOR = 2.16 (95% CI 1.14–4.10)) and tachycardic (aOR = 2.13 (95% CI 1.34–3.38)) on initial ED presentation. Preexisting hypertension, diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease, chronic kidney disease and malignancy were all highly significant risk factors for 30-day hospital admission following initial ED discharge (p < 0.0001).ConclusionEmergency Department providers should consider age, chief complaint, vital signs and comorbid medical conditions when determining disposition for patients diagnosed with COVID-19.     

Emergency Department Use by Terminally Ill Patients: A Systematic Review

ContextTerminally ill patients (TIP) frequently visit the emergency department (ED), but the prevalence of these visits is unclear.ObjectiveTo determine the prevalence of TIP visiting the ED.MethodsSystematic review of observational studies published between 1998 and 2018 reporting adults TIP who used the hospital ED, searching in PubMed, CINAHL, SciELO, LILACS, and Cochrane. Three evaluators selected and extracted data (kappa concordance 0.63). The quality of the studies was evaluated with the Newcastle–Ottawa scale and global estimates were made, calculating combined prevalence (95% confidence interval [CI]) and heterogeneity of the studies (I²).ResultsWe identified 2429 publications, ultimately including 31 studies in 14 countries; 79% were from high-income countries, 21% from medium-income countries, and none from low-income countries. Most were from 2015. We found that 45% of patients with cancer visited the ED in the last month of life [95% CI 37–54%] and 75% in the last six months of life [95% CI 62–83%]; I² = 100%. Overall, 17% of patients who visited the ED had a terminal illness [95% CI 12–23%]; I² = 98%. Few studies reported terminal nononcologic illness, specific age groups or diseases, hospital admission rates, use of palliative care or nonresuscitation, or other criteria that could be used for grouping.ConclusionsPatients with terminal cancer frequently use the ED at the end of life, although use varies among patients and few studies have examined low-income countries or patients with nononcologic terminal illness. The global prevalence of TIP in the ED cannot be calculated from limited reports.     

Retrospective review of patients with lung cancer identified in the emergency department

BackgroundObtaining a diagnosis of cancer following an emergency department (ED) visit is associated with poor outcomes and advanced stage. Limited data is available from EDs in the United States. We describe a cohort of patients that obtained a diagnosis of lung cancer because of an ED visit.MethodsThis is a single center, retrospective cohort of patients with lung cancer who presented to the ED between December 2016 and December 2019. We investigated demographics, access to primary care, previous cancer screening, cancer type/stage, mortality, and imaging study that suggested cancer. The primary outcome is the percentage of lung cancer diagnoses over a 4-year period that resulted from an ED visit.ResultsAmong the 268 patients with lung cancer, 152 patients (57.6%) had presented to the ED with a workup that was concerning for lung cancer. Patients were generally elderly (median 62-years old), African American (n = 77, 51%), and smokers (n = 145, 95.4%) with a median smoking pack years of 40. Only 24 patients (15.8%) had seen a primary care physician within 1 year of diagnosis, and only 8 patients were appropriately screened for lung cancer. The most common type of cancer was non-small-cell carcinoma (111, 73.0%), with 61.3% of those being adenocarcinoma (n = 68). Patients were most likely to be stage IV (n = 86, 56.6%), and the overall mortality was 53.3% (n = 81, 1 year follow-up). Most patients (88/152, 57.9%) of patients were admitted to the hospital, and Medicare patients (OR 2.7, 95% CI 1.37–5.23) and patients with stage IV disease (OR 2.22, 95% CI1.15–4.29) were more likely to be admitted. Patients were more likely to have a concerning finding on computed tomography (CT) versus chest x-ray (55.9% versus 36.8%, respectively). CT scan reports were more likely to mention malignancy (OR 5.9, 95% CI 2.5–14.0) or metastasis (OR 30, 95% CI 7.1–127.1) than chest x-ray.ConclusionPatients that have lung cancer diagnosed through the ED are more likely to be advanced stage at time of diagnosis and are more likely to have CT scans demonstrate concerning findings. Given the lack of previous cancer screening, the advanced stage at presentation of lung cancer to the ED, and high mortality rates, the ED may serve a public health role in addressing lung cancer screening.     

One-way-street revisited: Streamlined admission of critically-ill trauma patients

IntroductionEmergency department (ED) crowding is associated with increased mortality and delays in care. We developed a rapid admission pathway targeting critically-ill trauma patients in the ED. This study investigates the sustainability of the pathway, as well as its effectiveness in times of increased ED crowding.Materials & methodsThis was a retrospective cohort study assessing the admission of critically-ill trauma patients with and without the use of a rapid admission pathway from 2013 to 2018. We accessed demographic and clinical data from trauma registry data and ED capacity logs. Statistical analyses included univariate and multivariate testing.ResultsA total of 1700 patients were included. Of this cohort, 434 patients were admitted using the rapid admission pathway, whereas 1266 were admitted using the traditional pathway. In bivariate analysis, mean ED LOS was 1.54 h (95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 1.41, 1.66) with the rapid pathway, compared with 5.88 h (95% CI: 5.64, 6.12) with the traditional pathway (p < 0.01). We found no statistically significant relationship between rapid admission pathway use and survival to hospital discharge. During times of increased crowding, rapid pathway use continued to be associated with reduction in ED LOS (p < 0.01). The reduction in ED LOS was sustained when comparing initial results (2013–2014) to recent data (2015–2018).ConclusionThis study found that a streamlined process to admit critically-ill trauma patients is sustainable and associated with reduction in ED LOS. As ED crowding remains pervasive, these findings support restructured care processes to limit prolonged ED boarding times for critically-ill patients.     

National Early Warning Score Is Modestly Predictive of Care Escalation after Emergency Department-to-Floor Admission

BackgroundDecompensation on the medical floor is associated with increased in-hospital mortality.ObjectiveOur aim was to determine the accuracy of the National Early Warning Score (NEWS) in predicting early, unplanned escalation of care in patients admitted to the hospital from the emergency department (ED) compared to the Shock Index (SI) and the quick Sepsis-Related Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients admitted directly from the ED to monitored or unmonitored beds (November 9, 2015 to April 30, 2018) in 3 hospitals. Interhospital transfers were excluded. Patient data, vital status, and bed assignment were extracted from the electronic medical record. Scores were calculated using the last set of vital signs prior to leaving the ED. Primary endpoint was in-hospital death or placement in an intermediate or intensive care unit within 24 h of admission from the ED. Scores were compared using the area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC).ResultsOf 46,018 ED admissions during the study window, 39,491 (85.8%) had complete data, of which 3.7% underwent escalation in level of care within 24 h of admission. NEWS outperformed (AUROC 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.68–0.69) qSOFA (AUROC 0.63; 95% CI 0.62–0.63; p < 0.001) and SI (AUROC 0.60; 95% CI 0.60–0.61; p < 0.001) at predicting unplanned escalations or death at 24 h.ConclusionsThis multicenter study found NEWS was superior to the qSOFA score and SI in predicting early, unplanned escalation of care for ED patients admitted to a general medical-surgical floor.     

Patient Navigation to Reduce Emergency Department (ED) Utilization Among Medicaid Insured,Frequent ED Users: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BackgroundSome Medicaid enrollees frequently utilize the emergency department (ED) due to barriers accessing health care services in other settings.ObjectivesTo determine whether an ED-initiated Patient Navigation program (ED-PN) designed to improve health care access for Medicaid-insured frequent ED users could decrease ED visits, hospitalizations, and costs.MethodsWe conducted a prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing ED-PN with usual care (UC) among 100 Medicaid-enrolled frequent ED users (defined as 4–18 ED visits in the prior year), assessing ED utilization during the 12 months pre- and post-enrollment. Secondary outcomes included hospitalizations, outpatient utilization, hospital costs, and Medicaid costs. We also compared characteristics between ED-PN patients with and without reduced ED utilization.ResultsOf 214 eligible patients approached, 100 (47%) consented to participate. Forty-nine were randomized to ED-PN and 51 to UC. Sociodemographic characteristics and prior utilization were similar between groups. ED-PN participants had a significant reduction in ED visits and hospitalizations during the 12-month evaluation period compared with UC, averaging 1.4 fewer ED visits per patient (p = 0.01) and 1.0 fewer hospitalizations per patient (p = 0.001). Both groups increased outpatient utilization. ED-PN patients showed a trend toward reduced per-patient hospital costs (−$10,201, p = 0.10); Medicaid costs were unchanged (−$5,765, p = 0.26). Patients who demonstrated a reduction in ED usage were older (mean age 42 vs. 33 years, p = 0.03) and had lower health literacy (78% low health literacy vs. 40%, p = 0.02).ConclusionAn ED-PN program targeting Medicaid-insured high ED utilizers demonstrated significant reductions in ED visits and hospitalizations in the 12 months after enrollment.     

Efficacy of a heel offloading boot in reducing heel pressure injuries in patients in Australian intensive care units: A single-blinded randomised controlled trial

ObjectivesTo compare time to incidence, extent of incidence and severity of heel pressure injury with a heel off-loading boot (intervention) or pillows (control).Research methodology/designMulti-centre, single-blinded randomised controlled trial of 394 critically ill patients. Patients were randomised to the intervention or control for heel offloading.SettingThree hospital intensive care units; two in greater Sydney, Australia and one in regional New South Wales, Australia.Main outcome measuresTime to intensive care unit-acquired pressure injury in heels of patients without pre-existing heel pressure injury within 28 days from intensive care unit admission. Secondary outcomes: incidence of heel pressure injury within 28 days of intensive care unit admission; severity of intensive care unit-acquired heel pressure injuries; occurrence of plantar contractures (a change in ankle dorsiflexion of 5° or greater) within 28 days of admission.ResultsWithin 28 days of admission, one pressure injury was recorded in the intervention group and 11 in the control group. Hazard of pressure injury incidence within 28 days of admission was significantly lower (p = 0.0239) in heels assigned to the intervention (hazard ratio 0.0896 [95% CI 0.0110, 0.727]). Odds of pressure injury incidence within 28 days of admission were significantly lower (p = 0.0261) in the intervention group (odds ratio 0.0883 [95% CI 0.0104, 0.749]). The pressure injury recorded in the intervention group was superficial (stage 1) whereas those recorded in the control group were more severe (stage 2 to 4).ConclusionThe heel-offloading boot used in this study significantly reduced heel pressure injury occurrence compared with heel offloading using pillows.     

Emergency department factors associated with survival after sudden cardiac arrest

Background

Sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) is a leading cause of death in the US. Recent innovations in post-arrest care have been demonstrated to increase survival. However, little is known about the impact of emergency department (ED) and hospital characteristics on survival to hospital admission and ultimate outcome.

Objective

We sought to describe the incidence of SCA presenting to the ED and to identify ED and hospital characteristics associated with survival to hospital admission.

Methods

We identified patients with diagnoses of atraumatic cardiac arrest or ventricular fibrillation (ICD-9 427.5 or 427.41) in the 2007 Nationwide Emergency Department Sample (NEDS), a nationally representative estimate of all ED admissions in the United States. We defined SCA as cardiac arrest in the out-of-hospital or ED settings. We used the NEDS sample design to generate nationally representative estimates of the incidence of SCA that presents to EDs. We performed unadjusted and adjusted analyses to examine the relation between patient, ED, and hospital characteristics and outcome using logistic regression. Our primary outcome was survival to hospital admission. Survival to hospital discharge was a secondary outcome. Data are presented as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Results

Of the 966 hospitals in the NEDS, 933 (96.6%) reported at least one SCA and were included in the analysis. We identified 38,593 cases of cardiac arrest representing an estimated 174,982 cases nationally. Overall ED SCA survival to hospital admission was 26.2% and survival to discharge was 15.7%. Greater survival to admission was seen in teaching hospitals (OR 1.3 95% CI 1.1–1.5, p = 0.001), hospitals with ≥20,000 annual ED visits (OR 1.3 95% CI 1.1–1.6, p = 0.003), and hospitals with percutaneous coronary intervention capability (OR 1.6 95% CI 1.4–1.8, p < 0.001). Higher SCA volume (>40 annually) was associated with lower survival overall (OR 0.7 95% 0.6–0.9, p = 0.010), but not when transferred patients were excluded from the analysis (OR 0.8 95% CI 0.6–1.1, p = 0.116).

Conclusions

An estimated 175,000 cases of SCA present to or occur in US EDs each year. Percutaneous coronary intervention capability, ED volume, and teaching status were associated with higher survival to hospital admission. Emergency departments with higher annual SCA volume had lower survival rates, possibly because they transfer fewer patients. An improved understanding of the contribution of ED care to survival following SCA may be useful in advancing our understanding of how best to organize a system of care to ensure optimal outcomes for patients with SCA.     

Resource utilization across the continuum of HIV care: An emergency department-based cohort study

BackgroundThe objective of this study was to determine the healthcare resource utilization for people living with HIV (PLWH) presenting to the emergency department (ED) across the HIV Care Continuum.MethodsThis prospective study enrolled PLWH presenting to an urban ED between June 2016 and March 2017. Subjects were categorized as being linked to care, retained in care, on antiretroviral therapy (ART), and virally suppressed (<200 copies/ml). Data on ED visit rates, duration of stay, and hospital admission rates were compared to local metrics.ResultsOverall, 94.3% of 159 enrollees had been linked to care, 75.5% retained in care, 81.1% on ART, and 62.8% virally suppressed. Compared to the general population of the city and of the ED, participants had a higher ED visit rate (3.0 v. 1.2 visits per person-per year) in the past two years, a higher median duration of ED stay (12.6 v. 7.6 h), and a higher hospital admission rate (36.5% v. 24.9%) during their index ED visit. Viral suppression was negatively associated with admission (OR = 0.35, 95% CI: 0.17, 0.72). Forty-eight (30.2%) participants who had at least eight ED visits in the past two years were more likely to have a diagnosed mental health disorder (79.2% v. 62.2%, p=0.036).ConclusionsOur results showed that PLWH use more ED resources than the general population and a better engagement in HIV care is linked to lesser ED resource utilization for PLWH, indicating the importance of improved HIV care engagement in healthcare utilization management.     

Do alcohol use disorders impact on long term outcomes from intensive care?

IntroductionThere is limited evidence regarding the impact of alcohol use disorders on long term outcomes from intensive care. The aims of this study were to analyse the nature and complications of alcohol related admissions to intensive care and determine whether alcohol use disorders impact on survival at six months post ICU discharge.MethodThis was an 18 month prospective observational cohort study in a 20 bedded mixed ICU, in a large teaching hospital in Scotland. On admission patients were allocated to one of three alcohol groups: low risk, harmful/hazardous, or alcohol dependency.Results34.4% of patients were admitted with an alcohol use disorder. Those with an alcohol related admission (either harmful/hazardous or alcohol dependent) had an increased odds of developing septic shock during their admission, compared with the low risk group (OR 1.67; 95% CI 1.13-2.47, p = 0.01). After adjustment for all lifestyle factors which were significantly different between the groups, alcohol dependence was associated with more than a twofold increased odds of ICU mortality (OR 2.28; 95% CI 1.2-4.69, p = 0.01) and hospital mortality (OR 2.43; 95% CI 1.28-4.621, p = 0.004). After adjustment for deprivation category and age, alcohol dependence was associated with an almost two fold increased odds of mortality at six months post ICU discharge (HR 1.86; CI 1.30-2.70, p = 0.001).ConclusionAlcohol use disorders are a significant risk factor for the development of septic shock in intensive care. Further, alcohol dependency is independently associated with poorer long term outcomes from intensive care.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13054-015-0909-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.     

Measuring organizational context in Australian emergency departments and its impact on stroke care and patient outcomes

BackgroundEmergency departments (ED) are challenging environments but critical for early management of patients with stroke.PurposeTo identify how context affects the provision of stroke care in 26 Australian EDs.MethodNurses perceptions of ED context was assessed with the Alberta Context Tool. Medical records were audited for quality of stroke care and patient outcomes.FindingsCollectively, emergency nurses (n = 558) rated context positively with several nurse and hospital characteristics impacting these ratings. Despite these positive ratings, regression analysis showed no significant differences in the quality of stroke care (n = 1591 patients) and death or dependency (n = 1165 patients) for patients in EDs with high or low rated context.DiscussionFuture assessments of ED context may need to examine contextual factors beyond the scope of the Alberta Context Tool which may play an important role for the understanding of stroke care and patient outcomes in EDs.     

Time to specialty care and mortality after cardiac arrest

IntroductionOut of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients are often transported to the closest emergency department (ED) or cardiac center for initial stabilization and may be transferred for further care. We investigated the effects of delay to transfer on in hospital mortality at a receiving facility.MethodsWe included OHCA patients transported from the ED by a single critical care transport service to a quaternary care facility between 2010 and 2018. We calculated dwell time as time from arrest to critical care transport team contact. We abstracted demographics, arrest characteristics, and interventions started prior to transport arrival. For the primary analysis, we used logistic regression to determine the association of dwell time and in-hospital mortality. As secondary outcomes we investigated for associations of dwell time and mortality within 24 h of arrival, proximate cause of death among decedents, arterial pH and lactate on arrival, sum of worst SOFA subscales within 24 h of arrival, and rearrest during interfacility transport.ResultsWe included 572 OHCA patients transported from an outside ED to our facility. Median dwell time was 113 (IQR = 85–159) minutes. Measured in 30 min epochs, increasing dwell time was not associated with in-hospital mortality, 24-h mortality, cause of death and initial pH, but was associated with lower 24-h SOFA score (p = 0.01) and lower initial lactate (p = 0.03). Rearrest during transport was rare (n = 29, 5%). Dwell time was associated with lower probability of rearrest during transport (OR = 0.847, (95% CI 0.68–1.01), p = 0.07).ConclusionsDwell time was not associated with in-hospital mortality. Rapid transport may be associated with risk of rearrest. Prospective data are needed to clarify optimal patient stabilization and transport strategies.     

Predictive value of the National Early Warning Score–Lactate for mortality and the need for critical care among general emergency department patients

Study objectivesWhat is the predictive value of the National Early Warning Score–Lactate (NEWS-L) score for mortality and the need for critical care in general emergency department (ED) patients?MethodsIn this retrospective cohort study, we enrolled all adult patients who visited the ED of an urban academic tertiary-care university hospital in South Korea over 2 consecutive months. The primary outcome was 2-day mortality. The secondary outcomes were the need for critical care (advanced airway use, vasopressor or inotropic agent use, intensive care unit admission) during an ED stay; 2-day composite outcome (2-day mortality and the need for critical care); 7-day mortality; and in-hospital mortality.ResultsDuring the study period, 4624 adult patients visited the ED. Of these, 87 (1.9%) died within 2 days. In total, 481 patients (10.4%) required critical care during their ED stay. The 2-day composite outcome, 7-day mortality, and in-hospital mortality were 10.9% (503/4624), 2.5% (116/4624), and 3.9% (182/4624), respectively. The NEWS-L demonstrated excellent predictive value for 2-day mortality with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.96 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.94-0.98); this value was better than that of the NEWS alone (AUROC 0.94 [95% CI, 0.91-0.96], P = .002). The AUROC of the NEWS-L for the need for critical care was 0.83 (95% CI, 0.81-0.85); for the 2-day composite outcome, it was 0.84 (95% CI, 0.82-0.86); for 7-day mortality, it was 0.94 (95% CI, 0.92-0.96); and for in-hospital mortality, it was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.85-0.90). Logistic regression results confirmed that the ratio of the NEWS to the initial lactate level was 1:1. Similar results were obtained in the subgroup analyses (disease-infection, disease–vascular and heart, disease-others, and nondisease). The high-risk NEWS-L group (NEWS-L ≥ 7, 9.4% of all patients) had an adjusted odds ratio of 28.67 (12.66-64.92) for 2-day mortality in the logistic regression model adjusted for basic characteristics.ConclusionThe NEWS-L can provide excellent discriminant value for predicting 2-day mortality in general ED patients, and it has the best discriminant value regarding the need for critical care and composite outcomes. The NEWS-L may be helpful in the early identification of at-risk general ED patients.     

Trends in Place of Death for Individuals With Deaths Attributed to Advanced Chronic or End-Stage Kidney Disease in the United States

ContextAn important aspect of end-of-life care, place of death is understudied in advanced chronic (CKD) and end-stage kidney disease (ESKD).ObjectiveWe sought to examine trends and factors associated with where advanced CKD/ESKD patients die.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study using mortality data from 2003 to 2017 for deaths attributed primarily to advanced CKD/ESKD in the United States.ResultsBetween 2003 and 2017, 222,247 deaths were attributed to advanced CKD/ESKD. From 2003 to 2017, deaths occurring in hospitals declined from 56.0% (n = 5356) to 35.6% (n = 7764), whereas increases occurred in deaths at home (13.5% [n = 1292] to 24.3% [n = 5306]), nursing facilities (18.6% [n = 1776] to 19.3% [n = 4221]), and hospice facilities (0.3% [n = 29] to 13.4% [n = 2917]). Nonwhite race was associated with increased odds of hospital death (Black [OR = 1.59; 95% CI = 1.55, 1.62]; Native American [OR = 1.47; 95% CI = 1.32, 1.63]; Asian [OR = 1.43; 95% CI = 1.32, 1.55] and reduced odds of nursing facility (Black [OR = 0.622; 95% CI = 0.600, 0.645]; Native American [OR = 0.638; 95% CI = 0.572, 0.712]; Asian [OR = 0.574; 95% CI = 0.533, 0.619], or hospice facility death (Black [OR = 0.843; 95% CI = 0.773, 0.918]; Native American [OR = 0.380; 95% CI = 0.289, 0.500]; Asian [OR = 0.609; 95% CI = 0.502, 0.739]). Older age was associated with reduced odds of hospital death (≥85 [OR = 0.334; 95% CI = 0.312, 0.358]) and increased odds of home (≥85 [OR = 1.55; 95% CI = 1.43, 1.68]), nursing facility (≥85 [OR = 3.09; 95% CI = 2.76, 3.45]) or hospice facility death (≥85 [OR = 1.60; 95% CI = 1.49, 1.72]).ConclusionsHospitals remain the most common place of death from advanced CKD/ESKD; however, the proportion of home, nursing facility, and hospice facility deaths have increased.     

Sociodemographic Factors Associated With Adherence to Referrals From the Pediatric Emergency Department

BackgroundOutpatient referrals constitute a critical component of emergency medical care. However, barriers to care after emergency department (ED) visits have not been investigated thoroughly.ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to determine the impact of sociodemographic variables on referral attendance after ED visits.MethodsA retrospective cohort study was designed. Patients aged 0–17 years who visited the C.S. Mott Children's Hospital ED in 2016 and received a referral were included. Multiple referrals for 1 patient were counted as independent encounters for statistical analysis.ResultsChart review was performed on 6120 pediatric ED encounters, producing a total of 822 referrals to University of Michigan Health System outpatient clinics. Referral attendance did not differ by race, ethnicity, language, or religion. Older age was associated with decreased attendance at referrals (p = 0.043). Patients who were black and female (p = 0.019), patients with public health insurance (p = 0.004), and patients residing in areas with either high rates of unemployment (p = 0.003), or lower high school education rates (p = 0.006) demonstrated decreased attendance. Patients referred to pediatric neurology had lower attendance rates (p < 0.001), and those referred to pediatric orthopedic surgery attended referrals more often (p = 0.006).ConclusionsThis study provides an overview of the impact of sociodemographic and departmental factors on attendance at outpatient follow-up referrals. Significant disparities exist with respect to referral attendance after emergency medical care. Informed resource allocation may be utilized to improve care for these at-risk patient populations.     

Missed Opportunities of Integration of Palliative Care: Frequency,Causes, and Profile of Missed Visits in an Oncologic Palliative Care Outpatient Unit

ContextMany patients with cancer are referred to palliative care (PC) outpatient clinics but do not attend consultations, which increases the difficultly of integrating PC in a timely manner.ObjectivesTo evaluate the frequency, causes, and profile of missing first-time consultations in a PC outpatient clinic.MethodsData from patients with advanced cancer who were scheduled for first-time visits to the PC outpatient clinic from September 2018 to August 2019 were analyzed. Missed consultation was defined as a nonperformed consultation with no prior notice of cancellation, and missed opportunity of palliative care (MOPC) was defined as a nonperformed consultation regardless of being notified in advance. The causes of the absence were identified by telephone using a standardized form. Logistic regression models were used to identify the profile of patients who have MOPC.ResultsAbout 1468 patients were scheduled for first-time visits to the PC outpatient clinic; missed consultation = 21.7% (n = 275) and MOPC = 32.5% (n = 478). Of the total number of patients who had MOPC, 86 (18%) were later seen in a median time (percentile p25–p75) of 29.5 days (range 7.0–66.5). The most common cause of MOPC was death before consultation (n = 92; 29.8%). Referral to PC using a standardized protocol (odds ratio 0.787; P = 0.044) and residence in distant cities (odds ratio 2.394; P < 0.001) were independently associated with MOPC.ConclusionApproximately one-third of patients eligible for PC miss the opportunity to be included earlier; only 18% of them are consulted later. Use of standardized referral protocols may help to reduce these absence rates.     

Rates and factors associated with admission in patients presenting to the ED with TIA in the United States—2006 to 2008

BackgroundThe estimates of patients who present with transient ischemic attacks (TIA) in the emergency departments (EDs) of United States and their disposition and factors that determine hospital admission are not well understood.ObjectiveWe used a nationally representative database to determine the rate and predictors of admission in TIA patients presenting to EDs.MethodsWe analyzed data from the National Emergency Department Sample (2006-2008) for all patients presenting with a primary diagnosis of TIA in the United States. Samples were weighted to provide national estimates of TIA hospitalizations and identify factors that increase the odds of hospital admission including age, sex, type of insurance, median household income, and hospital type (urban teaching, urban nonteaching, and nonurban). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors of hospital admission.ResultsThere were 812 908 ED visits for primary diagnosis of TIA; mean age (± SD), 70.3 ± 14.9 years; and 57.9% were women from 2006 to 2008. Of these ED visits, 516 837 (63.5%) were admitted to the hospital, whereas 296 071 (36.5%) were discharged from the ED to home. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis adjusting age, sex, and medical comorbidities, independent factors associated with hospital admissions were median household income $64 000 or higher (odds ratio [OR], 1.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.22-1.44; P = .003), Medicare insurance type (OR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.14-1.26; P < .0001), and metropolitan teaching hospital ED (OR, 2.17; 95% CI, 1.90-2.48; P < .0001).ConclusionFrom 2006 to 2008, approximately 64% of all patients presenting with TIAs to the EDs within United States were admitted to the hospital. Factors unrelated to patients' condition such as median household income, insurance status, and ED affiliated hospital type play an important role in the decision to admit TIA patients to the hospitals.     

Association of Bartholin cysts and abscesses and sexually transmitted infections

IntroductionBartholin gland cysts or abscesses account for many gynecologic visits in the emergency department (ED). Previous smaller studies have suggested a link between Bartholin cysts/abscesses and sexually transmitted infections (STIs), but few studies have involved the ED.MethodsWe retrospectively identified patients aged 18 years or older seen in 1 ED between January 2012 and March 2017 who had urinalysis and urine culture and/or were tested for gonorrhea, chlamydia, or trichomonas by nucleic acid amplification testing. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to evaluate associations between Bartholin cysts/abscess and demographics, laboratory findings, and ED diagnoses.ResultsData were collected for 75,000 ED patients; 64 patients had a diagnosis of Bartholin cyst or abscess, 40 of whom were also tested for Neisseria gonorrhoeae or Chlamydia trachomatis. Ten percent of patients with a Bartholin cyst/abscess were infected with N gonorrhoeae, compared with 3% of those without a Bartholin cyst/abscess (P = .008). The rates of C trachomatis and Trichomonas vaginalis infections were 13% and 26%, respectively, among patients with a Bartholin cyst/abscess, compared with 8% and 30%, respectively, among those without a Bartholin cyst/abscess (P > .05 for both). On regression analysis, only increased urobilinogen level (β, 0.31; odds ratio, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.11–1.66; P = .003) and infection with N gonorrhoeae (β, 1.69; odds ratio, 5.40; 95% CI, 1.43–20.35; P = .01) were associated with a Bartholin cyst/abscess.ConclusionsClinicians in the ED should consider testing patients with a Bartholin cyst/abscess for gonorrhea.