Does “Just in Time” teaching of ergonomic principles improve posture of trainees during otologic microscopic surgery?

PurposeMusculoskeletal disorders are prevalent among otolaryngologists and otologists with symptoms starting during residency. Prior data suggested that high-risk joint angles were often adopted at procedure onset, suggesting a detrimental “natural” operating position. Despite its importance, dedicated ergonomic teaching is not systematically introduced into residency training. The objective of this study was to compare initial ergonomic positioning during microscopic temporal bone surgery between those who receive “Just in Time” ergonomic teaching prior to starting dissection with those who did not.Materials and methodsThis was a pilot, prospective trial in which otolaryngology residents at an urban, multicenter tertiary care academic institution (n = 14) wore ergonomic sensors (inertial measurement units) during microscopic temporal bone lab drilling. Prior to recording, participants were randomized to receive an instructional presentation on ergonomic principles (n = 8, intervention group) or not (n = 6, control group). The inertial measurement units analyzed neck and back angles for the initial 5 min of drilling.ResultsOf 14 trainees, 78.6 % had prior experience with otologic microscopic cases and 14.3 % reported prior surgical ergonomic training or instruction. The groups were matched in trainee height (P = 0.54), handedness (P = 0.83), stage of otolaryngology training (P = 0.64), prior otologic microscopic surgery experience (P = 0.35), prior temporal bone drilling experience (P = 0.35), and prior teaching in ergonomic principles (P = 0.47). Junior trainees (PGY 1–3) who did not receive “Just in Time” teaching adopted a posture with significantly higher risk back flexion compared to junior trainees who received the training (25.3° vs. 5.7°, P = 0.04). There was no difference in back positioning among senior trainees (12.6° vs. ?5.7°, P = 0.13). While there was a trend towards those in the intervention group adopting safer procedural posture, there was no significant difference in the overall cohort between the intervention and control groups in both neck positioning (?11.0° vs. ?19.1°, P = 0.17) and back positioning (8.6° vs. 19.1°, P = 0.18).ConclusionsMusculoskeletal related pain is prevalent among otolaryngologists and otologists with data suggesting that symptoms begin during residency. Targeted “Just in Time” teaching of ergonomic principles is feasible and may be effective for development of healthy postural habits, especially among junior trainees.     

手术预案汇报制度在耳鼻咽喉头颈外科住院医师规范化培训中的应用

目的 探讨手术预案汇报制度在耳鼻咽喉头颈外科住院医师规范化培训中的应用效果。方法 以2016—2020年在首都医科大学宣武医院耳鼻咽喉头颈外科进行住院医师规范化培训的15名住院医师为研究对象,分为实验组(8名)和对照组(7名)。对照组按照住院医师规范化培训大纲进行培训,实验组要求住院医师在完成培训大纲的基础上,制作并汇报手术预案,通过比较两组的出科考核成绩和年度考核成绩,分析手术预案汇报在教学中的效果。结果 实验组住院医师出科考核成绩为(92.44±2.41)分,而对照组为(88.79±2.67)分,差异具有统计学意义(t=-2.78,dF=13,P<0.05)。实验组住院医师年度考核成绩为(85.87±3.64)分,对照组为(80.29±2.98)分,差异具有统计学意义(t=-3.22,dF=13,P<0.05)。实验组8名住院医师共汇报预案397例,平均(49.62±17.20)例。结论 在耳鼻咽喉头颈外科住院医师规范化培训中,住院医师通过制作和汇报手术预案,巩固了基础理论知识、提高了临床思维能力,指导教师对预案中暴露出的问题进行针对性指导,提高了教学效果。     

Real-time light-guided vocal fold injection as a simulation-based training tool

ObjectiveCricothyroid (CT) approach for vocal fold injection (VFI) has advantages of a low complication rate, suitability for in-office practice, and good patient compliance. However, it requires a high level of experience and a steep learning curve due to invisibility of needle. Recently, real-time light-guided VFI (RL-VFI) was developed for safe and precise injection into laryngeal structures under light guidance. Herein, we describe the development of a simulation-based training (SBT) program using RL-VFI for CT approach and report its preliminary application with in-training otolaryngologists.MethodsThe workshop comprised 3 sessions: mini-lectures, and two hands-on training courses of conventional VFI and RL-VFI. Excised canine larynges and the device for RL-VFI were prepared for hands-on courses. Comfort levels for VFI was evaluated using visual analogue scale after each session. Trainees were requested to identify the needle tip on the target point lateral to vocal process. The time (s) to reach the target point was measured in all procedures. After workshop, all participants filled out questionnaires regarding their future preference for conventional VFI and RL-VFI.ResultsEleven otolaryngology residents participated in the study. The mean comfort levels were 1.7 ± 1.6, 5.5 ± 2.6, 4.8 ± 1.7, and 7.5 ± 1.6 for pre-workshop, post-lecture, post-conventional VFI, and post-RL-VFI (P < .001). The mean time (s) to reach the target point were 146.4 ± 90.1 and 42.7 ± 40.5 for conventional VFI and RL-VFI (P = .004). The mean preference scores were 4.2 ± 1.3 and 8.7 ± 1.3 for conventional VFI and RL-VFI (P = .004).ConclusionSBT program using RL-VFI might improve the comfort levels of trainees for VFI with CT approach. It would be helpful for trainees to practice VFI before trying it on actual patients.Level of evidenceN/A.     

Development of a novel 3D-printed and silicone live-wire model for thyroidectomy

PurposeWe present the development and validation of a novel and innovative low-cost model for thyroidectomy. The purpose is to provide a high-fidelity and inexpensive method to provide repetition to surgeons early on the learning curve.Materials and methodsThe model consists of a 3D-printed laryngeal and tracheal framework, with silicone components to replicate the thyroid gland, strap muscles, and skin. A copper wire models the recurrent laryngeal nerve and is circuited with a buzzer to indicate contact with instruments. Thirteen resident trainees successfully completed the simulated thyroidectomy after viewing an instructional video. Face validity of the model was assessed with a 19-item 5-point Likert scale survey. Subject performance was assessed using a checklist of procedure steps.ResultsParticipant feedback indicated enthusiasm for realism of the recurrent nerve (4.46 average Likert rating, 5 indicates strong agreement), dissection of the nerve (4.15), use of the buzzer (4.69), and overall satisfaction (4.46). Soft tissue components scored poorly including realism of the skin (3.08), thyroid gland (3.31), and mobilization of the lobe (3.23), identifying aspects to improve. All participants reported increased confidence with thyroid surgery after using the model; this was most pronounced among junior residents (1.5 ± 0.76 versus 3.13 ± 1.13; p = 0.016).ConclusionThyroidectomy requires repetition and volume to gain competence. Use of the simulator early in training will provide confidence and familiarity, to enhance the educational value of subsequent live surgery.     

Otolaryngology-related Google Search trends during the COVID-19 pandemic

ObjectiveTo assess trends of Google Search queries for symptoms and complaints encountered commonly in otolaryngology practices during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic when in-person care has been limited.Materials and methodsIn this cross-sectional study, data on Google Search queries in the United States for 30 otolaryngology-related terms were obtained from Google Trends. The means of relative search volume from the COVID-19 period (March 29, 2020 through May 16, 2020) were compared to similar periods from 2016 to 2019 using a t-test of two independent samples.ResultsIn total, 16.6% of search terms had significant increases in relative search volume during the COVID-19 period, with the largest percentage increase for “can't smell” (124.4%, p = .006), followed by “allergies” (30.3%, p = .03), “voice pain” (26.1%, p = .008), and “ears ringing” (19.0%, p < .001). Of all search terms, 26.7% had significant decreases in relative search volume, including the largest percentage decrease for “laryngitis” (59.8%, p < .001), followed by “thyroid nodule” (54.4%, p < .001), “thyroid cancer” (45.6%, p < .001), and “ENT” (34.9%, p < .001).ConclusionThis study demonstrates that Google search activity for many otolaryngology-related terms during the COVID-19 pandemic has increased or decreased significantly as compared to previous years. With reduced access to in-office otolaryngology care in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic, these are important considerations for otolaryngology practices to meet the needs of patients who lack access to care.     

Impacto de la pandemia COVID-19 en la formación de los residentes de otorrinolaringología

Background and objectivesTraining in surgical specialties has declined during the COVID-19 pandemic. A study was carried out to further analyze the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on specific aspects of clinical, training, and research activities performed by the otolaryngology residents in Spain.MethodsA cross-sectional qualitative study was conducted during the last two weeks of February 2021. The study consisted of an online survey taken by otolaryngology residents who had undertaken one-year continuing training from February 15, 2020, to February 15, 2021, and consisted of 26 questions exploring the impact of the COVID-19 on the health of the ENT residents and training activities. Categorical variables were reported as frequency and percentage. When indicated, Pearsońs Chi-square test (χ²) with Yates's correction and Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) were used.Results143 completed surveys were received from 264 residents (54.17%). 36 residents (25.2%) have suffered from the disease due to SARS-CoV-2. Most of them only developed mild symptoms (86.1%), with 3 requiring hospitalization (8.3%). The origin of infection was unknown in all reported cases and the need for confinement was principally due to either attending an asymptomatic patient in 9 cases (6.3%) or to being supposedly in close contact with an asymptomatic person in 22 (15.4%). 60.1% of the residents surveyed reported having lost more than 6 months of their training period, and in 18.8% of cases, it was as high as 10 and 12 months. There has been a reduction of more than 75% of what was planned in surgical training (P < .05) of tympanoplasty, mastoidectomy, stapedectomy, cochlear implants, endoscopic sinonasal and anterior skull base surgery, septoplasty and turbinoplasty.ConclusionsThe decline in ENT activity and residents having to assist in other COVID-19 units during the most critical moments of the pandemic, has caused the main reduction in their training capacity. Contagion mainly occurred through contact with asymptomatic carriers during patient care and through supposedly close contact with asymptomatic carriers. Virtual activities have been widely accepted, but they have not completely replaced all residents’ training needs. Measures should be implemented to recover lost training, especially surgical practical learning in otology and rhinology.     

Recognizing odontogenic sinusitis: A national survey of otolaryngology chief residents

PurposeOdontogenic sinusitis is underrepresented in sinusitis literature as well as in the otolaryngology teaching curriculum sponsored by the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. Otolaryngologists and residents in training may therefore have a decreased awareness of the condition. The objective of this study was to survey otolaryngology chief residents toward the ends of their training to determine how often they considered odontogenic sinusitis as a cause of unilateral sinus disease.Materials and methodsAn online REDCap survey was conducted from December 2018 to January 2019. Online surveys were emailed to 119 Otolaryngology residency program directors in the United States of America, which were then forwarded to their chief residents. Surveys included 3 demographic and 4 clinical questions. Clinical questions included 3 computed tomography-based questions requiring either differential diagnoses or most likely diagnosis, and 1 question on residents' perceived prevalence of odontogenic sinusitis as a cause of unilateral sinus opacification. Answer choices were tabulated and compared based on geographic region and post-residency career plans.ResultsOf 293 chief residents emailed, 94 completed the survey (32.1%). While answer choices on imaging-based questions varied, odontogenic sinusitis was generally underrecognized. Approximately 70% of residents felt odontogenic sinusitis represented 0%–40% of unilateral sinus opacification. There were no statistically significant differences in answers based on geographic distribution or post-residency career plans.ConclusionsOtolaryngology chief residents recognized odontogenic sinusitis with variable accuracy on imaging, and generally underestimated its prevalence as a cause of unilateral sinus opacification. Efforts should be made to teach otolaryngology residents about odontogenic sinusitis.     

Simulation-based training in ear,nose and throat skills and emergencies

ObjectivesThe aim of the study was to compare lecture-based teaching and simulation-based hybrid training for ENT induction and objectively assess the performance of trainees in a simulated environment.MethodsThis is a prospective interventional study that included 60 interns in their rotatory internship with no prior exposure to ENT emergencies. The interns came in batches of 5?6 for their 15-days ENT postings. On the first day, a pre-test questionnaire, lecture-based teaching on three scenarios and then allocation into one of the three simulation groups- Group A (Tracheostomy group), Group B (Nasogastric tube group), and Group C (Epistaxis group) was done. Hands-on simulation training was given only to the assigned group. At the end of 15-days, post-test questionnaire and an objective assessment of the three scenarios in a simulated environment was conducted. The same training was repeated for each batch of participants who attended the posting.ResultsThe participants had significant improvement in the post-test scores in all three scenarios (p < 0.05), and these improvements were marked in those who had received simulated training. On comparing simulation scores, the participants who received hands-on training on a particular scenario outperformed other (p < 0.05).ConclusionSimulation-based training improves cognition and overall confidence in managing ENT skills and emergencies. In simulation training, objective and standardized assessment is the key to achieve specific learning objectives to improve the psychomotor and cognitive skill.Level of evidenceII.     

Improving outcomes in a high-output pediatric otolaryngology practice

ObjectivesTo identify factors associated with efficient operating room work flow on high volume pediatric otolaryngology days and the effects on provider and perceived parent satisfaction.MethodsRetrospective review was performed of a sample of 20 days with greater than 10 cases per day performed by a pediatric otolaryngologist operating in 2 rooms. Turnover time and complications were the main outcome measures. Providers from otolaryngology and anesthesia that participated in these days were surveyed regarding efficiency, safety, and satisfaction.Results223 cases were performed over 20 operative days. The average turnover time was significantly longer in “major” surgeries (p = 0.03), cases with multispecialty involvement (p = 0.01), cases requiring intubation (p < 0.001), and in cases where a fellowship trained pediatric anesthesiologist (p = 0.01) or CRNA was present (p < 0.001). When comparing “fast” (<25 min average turnover) operative days vs. “slow” (>25 min average turnover) days, presence of a non-fellowship trained anesthesiologist (p < 0.001), and the presence of an anesthesiology resident (p = 0.03) were significantly associated with “fast” days, while the presence of a CRNA was associated with “slow” days (p < 0.001). A significantly greater proportion of patients required intubation on “slow” turnover days vs. “fast” days (p = 0.13). Only one complication was observed (0.4%). 48 providers were surveyed with a 63% response rate. Reported satisfaction amongst providers was significantly greater on days with at least 10 cases (p = 0.047) and on days with turnover times of 25 min or less (p < 0.001). Pre-operative nursing evaluation/preparation of the patient, inter-provider communication and delays in room cleaning/setup were identified most often as causative factors responsible for delays in turnover.ConclusionsHigh-operative volume operating days are common in pediatric otolaryngology and can be safely performed in an efficient manner. Appropriate scheduling and high-level communication between providers is needed to ensure success on these days. Identified areas of potential inefficiency can be a starting point for work flow optimization practices.     

Virtual vs in-person otolaryngology evaluation: The patient perspective

ObjectiveTo compare patient responses to validated satisfaction surveys for in-person vs virtual otolaryngology ambulatory evaluation.MethodsNational Research Corporation (NRC) Health patient survey answers between April 2020 and February 2021 were divided into in-person and virtual visit modalities. Responses were compared with two group t-tests or Wilcoxon rank sum tests. Relationships between visit modality by gender, age, race, and sub-specialty visit type and satisfaction scores were examined by testing interactions with separate ANOVA models.Results1242 in-person and 216 virtual patient satisfaction survey responses were highly favorable for all themes (communication, comprehension of treatment plan, and likelihood of future referral) with both visit modalities. Higher satisfaction for in-person evaluation was seen with communication (“care providers listened” 3.68 (0.67)–on a scale of 1-no to 4-yes, definitely) vs 3.57 (0.78), p = 0.0426; “courtesy/respect” 3.75 (0.62) vs 3.66 (0.69), p = 0.0265)), and comprehension of treatment plan (“enough info about treatment” 3.53 (0.79) vs 3.37 (0.92), p = 0.0120; “know what to do” 3.62 (0.76) vs 3.46 (0.88), p = 0.0023)). No differences were detected for future referral of clinic or provider. There was no association between visit modality and patient sociodemographic factors or sub-specialty visit types. Main effects were observed with respect to race, gender, and sub-specialty visit type.ConclusionPatient satisfaction scores for virtual visit evaluation were high and comparable to in-person evaluation, with a slight preference for in-person. Future studies are needed to identify which patients and conditions are particularly suited for virtual vs in-person delivery of otolaryngology services.     

Assessing physical functioning in otolaryngology: feasibility of the short physical performance battery

PurposeObjective measures of physical functioning and mobility are considered to be the strongest indicators of overall health and mortality risk in older adults. These measures are not routinely used in otolaryngology research. We investigated the feasibility of using a validated physical performance battery to assess the functioning of older adults seen in a tertiary care otolaryngology clinic.Materials and methodsThe Short Physical Performance Battery was performed on 22 individuals aged 50 years or older enrolled in the Studying Multiple Outcomes after Aural Rehabilitative Treatment (SMART) study at Johns Hopkins.ResultsWe successfully administered the SPPB to 22 participants, and this testing resulted in minimal participant and provider burden with respect to time, training, and space requirements. The mean time to complete 5 chair stands was 13.0 ± 3.8 seconds. The mean times for the side-by-side, semi-tandem, and tandem stands were 10.0 ± 0.0, 9.5 ± 2.1, and 8.8 ± 3.2 seconds, respectively. Mean walking speed was 1.1 ± 0.3 meters per second, and composite SPPB scores ranged from 6 to 12 (mean = 10.45, S.D. = 1.6).ConclusionsOur results demonstrate the feasibility of implementing a standardized physical performance battery to assess physical functioning in a cohort of older adults seen in a tertiary otolaryngology clinic. We provide detailed instructions, references, and analytic methods for implementing the SPPB in future otolaryngology studies involving older adults.     

Burnout and well‐being in otolaryngology trainees: A systematic review

ObjectiveTo comprehensively review the recent published literature to characterize current trends of burnout and well‐being among otolaryngology trainees.MethodsStudy design: systematic review and meta‐analysis. A comprehensive literature review from 2000 to 2021 of studies related to otolaryngology resident burnout and well‐being, as well as the general topic of well‐being among surgical residents was completed. All included studies were summarized qualitatively. For the quantitative analysis, only articles reporting a Maslach burnout inventory (MBI), modified MBI or Mini‐Z‐ Burnout assessment were included.ResultsTwenty‐five articles were included in the qualitative summary and nine articles in the quantitative analysis. In the qualitative summary, trainees were reported to have increased levels of distress and emotional hardening compared to attending otolaryngologists. Total hours worked per week and female gender were associated with worsened well‐being. Residency program strategies to improve trainee well‐being include program‐sponsored wellness activities, dedicated wellness champions, and assistance with clerical burden. Implementation of protected nonclinical time has been shown to decrease burnout and increase well‐being among trainees. Moreover, formal trainee mentorship programs have also been shown to reduce trainee burnout and stress. In the quantitative analysis, rates of trainee burnout ranged from 29.7% to 86% with an overall trend towards reduced rates of burnout from 2006 to 2021. Utilizing a weighted average, the overall burnout among otolaryngology residents was 58.6%.ConclusionsRates of burnout remain high among otolaryngology trainees. Implementing formal mentorship programs and providing protected time during regular work hours appear to be effective tools to improve resident well‐being.     

Asynchronous learning among otolaryngology residents in the United States

ObjectiveOtolaryngology resident learning has historically relied on didactic lectures, textbook reading, and practical hands-on patient care. However, evidence suggests that an increasing proportion of residents in other specialties are deviating from this paradigm. This work aims to characterize otolaryngology residents' current asynchronous learning practices (i.e., personal learning outside of didactics and patient care).MethodsA thirteen-question survey of otolaryngology residents in the United States was performed from 10/1/2020–12/1/2020 assessing demographics, educational resource utilization, and educational resource preference.ResultsNearly all (99 %) respondents reported engaging with educational materials outside of didactics and case prep. Textbook reading comprised 27 % of residents' total study time, with additional time split between board-review book reading (20 %), searching the web (18 %), watching online videos (15 %), and listening to podcasts (10 %). Residents' highest ranked resources were videos, board-review books, textbooks, podcasts, and recorded lectures. Among electronic and multimedia resources, more than half of residents used the following resources: Iowa Head and Neck Protocols (91 %), Board Vitals (75 %), UpToDate (60 %), YouTube (57 %), Google (56 %), and Headmirror (54 %).ConclusionCurrent otolaryngology resident learning involves substantial use of asynchronous learning, including videos, web-based learning, and podcasts, which currently outpace traditional textbook- and didactic-based education. This underscores the need to consider a paradigm shift within academic otolaryngology education away from textbooks and other tradition media to the generation of high-quality multimedia resources for resident learning.     

Factors predictive of an academic otolaryngologist’s scholarly impact

ObjectivesDescribe the h index as a bibliometric that can be utilized to objectively evaluate scholarly impact. Identify which otolaryngology subspecialties are the most scholarly. Describe if NIH funding to one’s choice of medical school, residency, or fellowship has any impact on one’s scholarly output. Determine other factors predictive of an academic otolaryngologist’s productivity.Study designAnalysis of bibliometric data of academic otolaryngologists.MethodsActive grants from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) to otolaryngology departments were ascertained via the NIH Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools Expenditures and Reports database. Faculty listings from these departments were gleaned from departmental websites. H index was calculated using the Scopus database.ResultsForty-seven otolaryngology programs were actively receiving NIH funding. There were 838 faculty members from those departments who had a mean h index of 9.61. Otology (h index 12.50) and head and neck (h index 11.96) were significantly (P < 0.0001) more scholarly than the rest of subspecialists. H index was significantly correlative (P < 0.0001) with degree of NIH funding at a given institution. H index was not significantly higher for those that attended medical school (P < 0.18), residency (P < 0.16), and fellowship (P < 0.16) at institutions with NIH funding to otolaryngology departments.ConclusionsH index is a bibliometric that can be used to assess scholarly impact. Otology and head and neck are the most scholarly subspecialists within otolaryngology. NIH funding to an individual’s medical school, residency, or fellowship of origin is not correlative with one’s scholarly impact, but current institutional affiliation and choice of subspecialty are.     

Shoulder function after neck dissection: Assessment via a shoulder-specific quality-of-life questionnaire and active shoulder abduction

ObjectiveNeck dissection results in a high probability of postoperative shoulder functional impairment, even when the spinal accessory nerve is preserved. Therefore, surgeons must inform patients about the expected functional and qualitative recovery of shoulder function after surgery.MethodsThe present study included a prospective cohort of 66 patients (85 neck dissection sides) who underwent neck dissection between December 2015 and July 2017 at a single institution. The active shoulder abduction angles of the affected side and the patient-reported shoulder-specific quality-of-life recovery score of the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (WORC) questionnaire were examined at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months postoperatively. Additionally, the association between these outcomes and risk factors for shoulder impairment were investigated.ResultsThe average active shoulder abduction angles were significantly improved at 3 and 6 months postoperatively compared with 1 month postoperatively (96.5 ± 4.3° at 1 month versus 110.1 ± 4.7° at 3 months, p = 0.035, and versus 142.0 ± 4.6° at 6 months, p < 0.0001). The proportion of patients who were unable to abduct their shoulders by 150° or more was significantly lower at 6 months postoperatively (41.5%) compared with 1 month postoperatively (82.4%, p < 0.0001). The WORC score significantly improved from 60.4 ± 2.4% at 1 month postoperatively to 67.9 ± 2.6% at 6 months postoperatively (p = 0.036). Multivariate analysis revealed that postoperative radiotherapy was a significant risk factor for shoulder impairment at 3 and 6 months postoperatively (p = 0.003 and p = 0.027, respectively), and that level V dissection and head and neck irradiation were significant risk factors for a worse shoulder outcome at 6 and 9 months postoperatively (respective p values for level V dissection and head and neck irradiation were p = 0.049 and p = 0.030 at 6 months postoperatively, and p = 0.016 and p = 0.013 at 9 months postoperatively).ConclusionSatisfactory functional and qualitative recovery of shoulder function was achieved at 6 months after neck dissection. Postoperative radiotherapy was a predictor of poor shoulder function in the early postoperative period; both level V dissection and head and neck irradiation were predictors of poor shoulder function at 6 and 9 months after neck dissection.     

Anxiety and depression in spasmodic dysphonia patients

Objective/HypothesisExperts used to believe that spasmodic dysphonia (SD) was a psychogenic disorder. Although SD is now established as a neurological disorder, the rates of co-morbid anxiety and depression range from 7.1% to 62%. Our objective was to study the prevalence and risk factors associated with these mood disorders in SD patients.Study designRetrospective.MethodsSD patients who presented for botulinum toxin injections were recruited. Demographic data, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10), General Self-Efficacy scale (GSES), Disease Specific Self-Efficacy in Spasmodic Dysphonia scale (DSSE), and Consensus Auditory Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) were collected.ResultsOne hundred and forty two patients (age (59.2 ± 13.6) years, 25.4% male) had VHI-10 of 26.3 ± 6.9 (mean ± standard deviation), GSES 33.2 ± 5.8, CAPE-V 43.9 ± 20.9, HADS anxiety 6.7 ± 3.7, and HADS depression 3.6 ± 2.8. About 19 (13.4%) and 4 (2.8%) had symptoms of anxiety and depression respectively. Final linear regression model for HADS anxiety (R² = 32.90%) showed that patients who were less likely to have anxiety symptoms were older age (p < 0.001), male (p = 0.002), have higher GSES (p < 0.001) and lower VHI-10 (p = 0.004). Final linear regression model for HADS depression score (R² = 34.42%) showed that patients who were less likely to have depressive symptoms had high DSSES (p < 0.001).ConclusionsPrevalence of anxiety (13.4%) and depression (2.8%) in SD were lower than previously reported in the literature. Risk factors for anxiety were: younger age, female gender, lower general self-efficacy, and higher perceived vocal handicap. The main risk factor for depression was lower disease specific self-efficacy.     

Anxiety and depression in patients with nasal septal deviation

ObjectiveNasal septal deviation (NSD) has a significant impact on patients' quality of life; however, there have been limited studies examining the psychological status of NSD patients. In this study, symptoms of depression and anxiety were investigated between NSD patients and controls using a self-report questionnaire.MethodsA case-control study design was used to evaluate the psychological burden of NSD in patients who visited the general hospital. The control group comprised of ENT outpatients without a history of chronic nasal disease. The Zung Self-rating Anxiety/Depression Scale (SDS/SAS) was used to evaluate the prevalence and severity of anxiety and depression between the NSD and control group.ResultsSeventy-six patients with NSD and 79 control patients were enrolled in the study. We found that depression and anxiety, as well as the co-morbidity of depression with anxiety, were more common in the NSD group in comparison to the control (39.5% vs 22.8%, p = 0.025; 38.2% vs 15.2%, p = 0.001; and 27.6% vs 11.4%, p = 0.011, respectively). The average SDS and SAS score was higher in NSD patients compared to controls (SDS: 49.7 ± 13.1 vs 45.2 ± 10.4, p = 0.019 and SAS: 48.1 ± 11.6 vs 41.3 ± 9.3, p < 0.001, respectively), and NSD patients were found to have more severe levels of anxiety and depression.ConclusionDepression and anxiety are more common and severe in patients with NSD. Therefore, psychological distress should be taken into consideration during the diagnostic and therapeutic process for patients with NSD.     

Self-assembling RADA16 peptide hydrogel supports hemostasis,synechiae reduction,and wound healing in a sheep model of endoscopic nasal surgery

ObjectivesComplications of endoscopic sinus/nasal turbinate surgery include postoperative hemorrhage, synechiae formation, and poor wound healing. Our primary objectives were to evaluate whether a topical hydrogel based on self-assembling RADA16 peptides: i) reduces bleeding and synechiae formation, and ii) supports wound healing, using a sheep nasal surgery model.MethodsThirty sheep received endoscopic surgery-created bilateral nasal mucosal injuries on the middle turbinate/opposing septum. Injuries were randomly assigned RADA16, Gelatin-thrombin, or no treatment. Outcomes included intra-operative hemostasis, scar tissue/synechiae formation and wound healing at 2 weeks and the 6-week study terminus, and histopathology.ResultsIntra-operative hemostasis time improved with RADA16 and Gelatin-thrombin versus Control wounds (139.7±56.2 s, 145.4±58.1 s, and 224.0±69.9 s, respectively; p < 0.0001 for both comparisons). Two-week synechiae scores (maximum 4 points) were similar in Controls (2.9±1.8 points) and Gelatin-thrombin (3.1±1.6 points) wounds (p > 0.05), but were reduced in RADA16 sites by 91% versus Controls and 92% versus Gelatin-thrombin treatment (0.3±0.6 points; p < 0.0001 for both comparisons). Six-week synechiae scores were similar in Control (1.1±1.7 points) and Gelatin-thrombin (1.7±2.0 points) wounds (p > 0.05), but reduced 100% in RADA16-treated wounds. Synechiae occurred in fewer RADA16-treated sites at 2 weeks (20%) versus Gelatin-thrombin (80%) and Controls (75%; p < 0.01) and at 6 weeks (0%, 50% and 35%, respectively; p < 0.01). RADA16 was associated with significantly lower 6-week histopathology scores, driven by reduced submucosal fibrosis and angiogenesis.ConclusionAlthough RADA16 and Gelatin-thrombin similarly accelerated hemostasis in this sheep endoscopic sinus surgery model, only RADA16 reduced postoperative synechiae formation at 2 weeks with an absence of synechiae at 6 weeks. Histology suggested RADA16 enhanced mucosal regeneration.     

Unidad de Atención al Paciente Traqueostomizado. Una solución innovadora desde Otorrinolaringología con carácter transversal para el hospital

Background and objectiveThe care of tracheostomized patients are high risk skills and low incidence. Strategies for improvement of health care in hospital wards and specialties other than otolaryngology based solely on training have not been able to offer an adequate solution. A tracheostomized patient unit is presented directed by the otolaryngology service to attend all tracheostomized hospitalized patients of all specialties.Material and methodsBackground: Third level public hospital with 876 hospitalization beds and 30 ICU beds for 481,296 inhabitants. Unit model: Transversal unit for the hospital providing attention to all tracheostomized patients, adults, and children, of all specialties, with dedication of 50% of a ENT nurse of hospitalization that moves to the hospitalization bed of the specialty of each patient and 50% of another office ENT nurse for ambulatory patients care, with the consultancy of an ENT specialist and coordinated by the ENT supervisor.Results572 patients between 2016 and 2021, 80% men, aged 63 ± 14 years, were attended in the unit. 14.7 ± 2 tracheostomized patients daily and 96 ± 4 complication annual consultations were attended, rising up to 19 tracheostomized patients daily by 2020 and 141 ± 8.4 consultations by complications in 2020 and 2021, during the COVID-19 pandemic. The mean stay of the non-ENT specialties was reduced in 13 days, increasing the satisfaction of the ENT and non-ENT professionals and the satisfaction of the users.ConclusionsA Tracheostomized Patient Care Unit proactively directed from the Otorhinolaryngology Service to transversally care for all tracheostomized patients improves the quality of health care by reducing stay, complications, and emergencies. Improves the satisfaction of non-otolaryngological professionals by reducing the anxiety of facing care of patients who lack knowledge and experience and that of ENT specialists and nurses by reducing unplanned extemporaneous demands for care. Improves user satisfaction by perceiving adequate continuity of care. The Otorhinolaryngology Services provide their experience in the management of laryngectomized and tracheostomized patients and in teamwork with other specialists and professionals without the need to create new structures outside otorhinolaryngology.     

Modified inspiratory muscle training (m-IMT) as promising treatment for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD)

BackgroundGastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is one of the most common diseases, but is still a challenge to cure. Different medical treatments are used, first of all Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), however these are sometimes ineffective and long-term intake can lead to underestimated complications. Recently, some studies investigated the role of inspiratory muscle training (IMT) in the medical treatment of GERD. It seems that IMT is able to increase the pressure generated by the lower oesophageal sphincter (LES), reduce spontaneous releases of LES, acid exposure, use of PPIs, and improve symptoms and quality of life for GERD patients.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of IMT in association with myofunctional therapy exercises of swallowing set by Daniel Garliner (m-IMT) on the symptoms of patients with non-erosive gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (NERD).MethodsTwenty-one adult patients with NERD were enrolled from May to December 2017 and performed m-IMT over a period of 4 weeks. Before and after treatment, all the patients completed the following questionnaires: GERD oesophageal symptomatology (GERDQ), extra-oesophageal GERD symptomatology (RSI), quality of life (GERD-Health Related Quality of Life Questionnaire (GERD-HRQL), and underwent laryngeal endoscopy.ResultsNineteen patients completed m-IMT. GERDQ (from 8.36 ± 3.94 to 1.7 ± 3.41; p < .05), RSI (from to 21.68 ± 10.26 to 6.93 ± 8.37; p < .05) and GERDHRQL (from 25.68 ± 16.03 to 8.4 ± 11.06; p < .05) the questionnaire scores significantly reduced after treatment. In addition, the laryngeal endoscopy score greatly improved (from 14.24 ± 4.15 to 7.4 ± 1.77; p < .05).Conclusionsm-IMT is a low cost therapy without side effects. It could be useful in association with PPI or alone for selected GERD cases and for mild NERD forms, in association with diet. Further studies are required to prove the effects of m-IMT on GERD symptoms and decide the best treatment schedule.