Multi-target stool DNA test in the surveillance of inflammatory bowel disease: a cross-sectional cohort study

Background and aim: Colonoscopic surveillance is recommended in patients with longstanding inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) as they are at increased risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). Non-invasive surveillance may improve compliance and access. Multi-target stool DNA (MT-sDNA) has been validated for screening of sporadic CRC but has not been assessed in IBD. Our aim was to assess the performance of a MT-sDNA test in a real-life surveillance setting of patients with longstanding IBD.

Material and methods: A total of 192 IBD patients enrolled from two prospective cohorts submitted an EDTA buffered stool sample and underwent chromo- or white light colonoscopy. Stools were assayed for methylated BMP3 &; NDRG4, mutant KRAS and β-actin by a laboratory blinded to clinical data.

Results: The multitarget-sDNA panel was positive in 2/2 CRC and 5/15 low-grade dysplasia (LGD)?Conclusion: The MT-sDNA panel detected CRC in IBD. Sensitivity for sub-centimeter colorectal neoplasms in IBD patients appears similar to that observed in the general population. The test may be a valuable tool for detection of malignancy during structured surveillance of long-term IBD in a first line hospital setting.     

Evaluation of a risk score based on dietary and lifestyle factors to target a population at risk in colorectal cancer screening

BackgroundThe aim of our study was to assess three risk scores to predict lesions, advanced neoplasia (high-risk adenomas and colorectal cancer (CRC)) and CRC in individuals who participate to colorectal cancer screening.MethodsThe data of dietary and lifestyle risk factors were carried out during 2 mass screening campaigns in France (2013–2016) and the FOBT result was collected until December 2018. The colonoscopy result in positive FOBT was recovered. Three risk scores (Betés score, Kaminski score and adapted-HLI) were calculated to detect individuals at risk of lesions.ResultsThe Betés score had an AUROC of 0.63 (95% CI, [0.61–0.66]) for lesions, 0.65 (95% CI, [0.61–0.68]) for advanced neoplasia and 0.65 (95% CI, [0.58–0.72]) for predicting screen-detected CRC.The adapted HLI score had an AUROC of 0.61 (95% CI, [0.58–0.65]) for lesions, 0.61 (95% CI, [0.56–0.65]) for advanced neoplasia and 0.55 (95% CI, [0.45–0.65]) for predicting screen-detected CRC.The Kaminski score had an AUROC of 0.65 (95% CI, [0.63–0.68]) for lesions, 0.65 (95% CI, [0.61–0.68]) for advanced neoplasia and 0.69 (95% CI, [0.62–0.76]) for predicting screen-detected CRC.ConclusionA simple questionnaire based on CRC risk factors could help general practitioners to identify participants with higher risk of significant colorectal lesions and incite them to perform the fecal occult blood test.     

Diagnostic accuracy of a quantitative faecal immunochemical test vs. symptoms suspected for colorectal cancer in patients referred for colonoscopy

Abstract

Objective: Determine diagnostic accuracy of a quantitative faecal immunochemical haemoglobin test (QuikRead go^® FIT, Orion Diagnostica Oy) in symptomatic patients referred for colonoscopy, at various cut-offs and for one or two tests.

Methods: Patients referred to four endoscopy units in mid-Sweden between 2013 and 2017 provided information on lower abdominal symptoms and faecal samples from two separate days prior to colonoscopy.

Results: In all, 5.4% (13/242) patients had colorectal cancer (CRC). For one FIT at cut-off 10?µg Hb/g faeces, sensitivity for CRC was 92% (95% CI 78–100%) and specificity 77% (95% CI 72–83%); equal to 74%; 95% CI 68–80 (178/242) colonoscopies potentially avoidable and one CRC missed. Based on the maximal outcome of two FITs, sensitivity was 100%, specificity 71% (66–77%) and 68%; 95% CI 62–74 (160/237) colonoscopies potentially avoidable. Among 17% (42/242) patients with one FIT of >200?µg Hb/g faeces, 85% (11/13) had CRC. Positive predictive values of FIT varied 16.9–26.2% depending on cut-off and one or two FITs, whereas NPVs were 99% and above in all scenarios.

In 60 patients reporting rectal bleeding, one FIT at cut-off 10?µg Hb/g discriminated well between CRC and other conditions (p?=?.001). In regression models, FIT was more important than age, sex and all symptoms.

Conclusion: One or two FITs in symptomatic patients referred for colonoscopy imply powerful risk stratification abilities for CRC, even among patients reporting rectal bleeding. Larger studies in various settings will clarify how to make the best use of this opportunity.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrails.gov NCT 02491593     

The risk of developing a mismatch repair deficient colorectal cancer after undergoing cholecystectomy

Objectives: Mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) colorectal cancer (CRC) is caused by inactivation of the MMR DNA repair system, most commonly via epigenetic inactivation of the MLH1 gene, and these tumors occur most frequently in the right colon. The objective was to determine whether cholecystectomy (CCY) increases the risk of a dMMR CRC by comparing CCY incidence in patients with dMMR CRC and proficient MMR (pMMR) CRC to unaffected controls.

Materials and methods: All patients diagnosed with CRC in Iceland from 2000 to 2009 (n?=?1171) were included. They had previously been screened for dMMR by immunohistochemistry (n?=?129 were dMMR). Unaffected age- and sex-matched controls (n?=?17,460) were obtained from large Icelandic cohort studies. Subjects were cross-referenced with all pathology databases in Iceland to establish who had undergone CCY. Odds ratios were calculated using unconditional logistic regression.

Results: Eighteen (13.7%) dMMR CRC cases and 90 (8.7%) pMMR CRC cases had undergone CCY compared to 1532 (8.8%) controls. CCY-related odds ratios (OR) were 1.06 (95% CI 0.90–1.26, p?=?.577) for all CRC, 1.16 (95% CI 0.66–2.05 p?=?.602) for dMMR CRCand 1.04 (95% CI 0.83–1.29, p?=?.744) for pMMR CRC. Furthermore, OR for dMMR CRC was 0.51 (95% CI 0.16–1.67, p?=?.266), 2.04 (95% CI 0.92–4.50, p?=?.080) and 1.08 (95% CI 0.40–2.89, p?=?.875)?<10 years, 10–20 years and?>20 years after a CCY, respectively.

Conclusions: There was no evidence of increased risk of developing dMMR CRC after CCY although a borderline significantly increased 2-fold risk was observed 10–20 years after CCY. Larger studies are warranted to examine this further.     

Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening Practices in a Midwest Urban Safety-Net Healthcare System

Aims

Although colorectal cancer screening (CRC) using stool-based test is well-studied, evidence on fecal immunochemical test (FIT) patterns in a safety-net healthcare system utilizing opportunistic screening is limited. We studied the FIT completion rates and adenoma detection rate (ADR) of positive FIT-colonoscopy (FIT-C) in an urban safety-net system.

Methods

We performed a retrospective cross-sectional chart review on individuals?≥?50 years who underwent CRC screening using FIT or screening colonoscopy, 09/01/2017–08/30/2018. Demographic differences in FIT completion were studied; ADR of FIT-C was compared to that of screening colonoscopy.

Results

Among 13,427 individuals with FIT ordered, 7248 (54%) completed the stool test and 230 (48%) followed up a positive FIT with colonoscopy. Increasing age (OR 1.01, CI 1.01–1.02), non-Hispanic Blacks (OR 0.87, CI 0.80–0.95, p?=?0.002), current smokers (OR 0.84, CI 0.77–0.92, p?<?0.0001), those with Medicaid (OR 0.86, CI 0.77–0.96, p?=?0.006), commercial insurance (OR 0.85, CI 0.78–0.94, p?=?0.002), CCI score?≥?3 (OR 0.82, CI 0.74–0.91, p?<?0.0001), orders by family medicine providers (OR 0.87, CI 0.81–0.94, p?<?0.0001) were associated with lower completion of stool test. Individuals from low median household income cities had lower follow-up of positive FIT, OR 0.43, CI 0.21–0.86, p?=?0.017. ADR of FIT-C was higher than that of screening colonoscopy.

Conclusion

Adherence to CRC screening is low in safety-net systems employing opportunistic screening. Understanding demographic differences may allow providers to formulate targeted strategies in high-risk vulnerable groups.

     

Association of Adenoma Detection Rate and Adenoma Characteristics With Colorectal Cancer Mortality After Screening Colonoscopy

Background & AimsThe adenoma detection rate (ADR) and characteristics of previously resected adenomas are associated with colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality. However, the combined effect of both factors on CRC mortality is unknown.Patients and methodsUsing data of the Austrian quality assurance program for screening colonoscopy, we evaluated the combined effect of ADR and lesion characteristics on subsequent risk for CRC mortality. We analyzed mortality rates for individuals with low-risk adenomas (1–2 adenomas <10 mm), individuals with high-risk adenomas (advanced adenomas or ≥3 adenomas), and after negative colonoscopy (negative colonoscopy or small hyperplastic polyps) performed by endoscopists with an ADR <25% compared with ≥25%. Cox regression was used to determine the association of combined risk groups with CRC mortality, adjusted for age and sex.ResultsWe evaluated 259,885 colonoscopies performed by 361 endoscopists. A total of 165 CRC-related deaths occurred during the follow-up period, up to 12.2 years. In all risk groups, CRC mortality was higher when colonoscopy was performed by an endoscopist with an ADR <25%. Compared with negative colonoscopy with an ADR ≥25%, CRC mortality was similar for individuals with low-risk adenomas irrespective of ADR (for ADR ≥25%: adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.22; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59–2.49; for ADR <25%: adjusted HR, 1.25; 95% CI, 0.64–2.43) and after negative colonoscopy with ADR <25% (adjusted HR, 1.27; 95% CI, 0.81–2.00). Individuals with high-risk adenomas were at significantly higher risk for CRC death if colonoscopy was performed by an endoscopist with an ADR <25% (adjusted HR, 2.25; 95% CI, 1.18–4.31) but not if performed by an endoscopist with an ADR ≥25% (adjusted HR, 1.35; 95% CI, 0.61–3.02).ConclusionsOur study adds important evidence for mandatory assessment and monitoring of performance quality in screening colonoscopy. High-quality colonoscopy was associated with a lower risk for CRC death, and the impact of ADR was strongest for individuals with high-risk adenomas.     

Evaluation of the Danish national strategy for selective use of colonoscopy in symptomatic outpatients without known risk factors for colorectal cancer

Objective. A diagnostic strategy implemented in Denmark in 2002 recommends selective use of colonoscopy in outpatients without known colorectal cancer (CRC) risk factors who are referred with symptoms consistent with possible CRC. Selection of patients for colonoscopy was based on the presenting symptom(s) and findings at the initial examination (flexible sigmoidoscopy/faecal occult blood test). The aim of this study was to evaluate the strategy by assessing the prevalence of patients with diagnosed CRC, the frequency of patients with missed CRC, the adherence to the strategy and the number of examinations performed. Material and methods. We prospectively studied patients aged 40 years and older without known risk factors for CRC, referred to two surgical outpatient clinics during a period of 15–16 months. Examinations, findings at the examinations, the final diagnoses and date of discharge were recorded. Missed CRCs were identified by follow-up in hospital discharge registries. Results. CRC was diagnosed in 126 (5.3%; 95% CI: 4.5–6.3%) of the 2361 patients included during the diagnostic work-up. Two additional cancers identified at follow-up were both missed during colonoscopy (1.5%; 95% CI: 0.2–5.4%). The adherence to the strategy was 75.7%, and 125 of the 126 patients with a CRC were examined in conformity with the recommended strategy. Almost 60% of the patients underwent colonoscopy and almost 50% underwent both flexible sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy. Conclusions. The diagnostic strategy is an acceptable alternative to initial colonoscopy, with a low probability of missing a CRC; however, a considerable proportion of the patients undergo colonoscopy and multiple examinations.     

Clinical impact of colonoscopy for patients with early gastric cancer treated by endoscopic submucosal dissection: A matched case–control study

BackgroundGastric cancer frequently occurs synchronously with colorectal cancer (CRC).AimsThe aim of the present study was to assess the value of colonoscopy in patients with primariy early gastric cancer (EGC) indicated for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and to identify predictors for the risk of high-risk adenomas.MethodsA total of 130 patients with EGC, who underwent both colonoscopy and gastric ESD, and 260 controls matched for age and sex, who underwent a colonoscopy as part of our institutional health check-up program.The prevalence of high-risk adenomas in EGC patients vs. controls was evaluated.ResultsHigh-risk adenomas were found in 43 (33%) EGC patients and 37 (14%) controls (P < 0.01). Multivariate analysis showed the presence of EGC was significantly associated with high-risk adenoma [odds ratio (OR) 2.8, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.7–4.9]. Among EGC patients, high serum CEA level (OR 2.4, 95% CI: 1.2–5.0) was an independent predictor for high-risk adenoma.ConclusionsPatients with EGC had a significant risk for colorectal cancer. When endoscopists detected an early gastric cancer indicated for ESD, colonoscopy should be considered for EGC patients with high serum CEA levels.     

Chromoendoscopy or white light endoscopy for neoplasia detection in Lynch syndrome,a meta-analysis

BackgroundLynch syndrome carries an increased risk of colorectal neoplasia, hence annual surveillance colonoscopy is recommended. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic yields of image enhancement modalities for colorectal neoplasia in patients with Lynch syndrome.MethodsMeta-analysis of pooled ratios of lesion detection rates (RRs) and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIS), comparing white light endoscopy (WLE) and chromoendoscopy (ChE).ResultsFour studies comparing WLE to ChE were analyzed. ChE fared better than WLE in overall lesion detection (RR 1.97, 95% CI 1.63–2.38) and detection of adenomas (RR 1.53, 95% CI 1.07–2.17), flat lesions (RR 3.4, 95% CI 2.47–4.67) and proximally-located lesions (RR 2.93, 95% CI 1.91–4.5). The odds of a patient having any lesion found were higher in ChE compared to WLE (OR 2.42, 95% CI 1.56–3.75). The odds of a patient having adenoma(s) found on endoscopy were not significantly higher in chromoendoscopy compared to white light endoscopy (OR 1.81, 95% CI 0.65–5.01).ConclusionUsing standard definition technology, ChE allows detection of more lesions, especially adenomas, flat lesions and proximal lesions in Lynch syndrome patients, compared to WLE. The results show that surveillance colonoscopy of Lynch syndrome patients should be performed using ChE.     

Age-adjusted incidence rates of synchronous liver metastases for stage IV colorectal cancer compared by sex,race, and age group

BackgroundReports on age-adjusted incidence rates of synchronous colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) among patients with stage IV colorectal cancer (CRC) are uncommon. This study presents in detail differences in CRLM incidence rates by sex, race, and age group.MethodsIncidence rates were obtained for adults diagnosed with Stage IV CRC in the years 2010–2015 using SEER. The ratio of CRLM incidence to stage IV CRC incidence was used to calculate the rate ratio.ResultsAverage age-adjusted CRLM incidence rate was 7.09 per 100,000 (95% CI, 6.93–7.26). CRLM incidence was higher at 8.68 (95% CI, 8.35–9.03) for males compared with 5.77 (95% CI, 5.64–5.90) for females. Highest incidence rate of 11.50 (95% CI, 10.43–11.76) was observed among Blacks. By age group the highest CRLM incidence was 24.42 (95% CI, 23.13–25.71) among adults age >75. The average rate ratio of CRLM to CRC incidence rate was 0.72 (95% CI, 0.71–0.73).ConclusionAge-adjusted incidence rates of synchronous CRLM are higher for men, Blacks, and older patients. The risk ratio indicates that 72% of stage IV CRC cases are at risk of synchronous CRLM, although CRLM risk appears to decline with age.     

Prevalence of colorectal cancer in cryptogenic pyogenic liver abscess patients. Do they need screening colonoscopy? A systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundCryptogenic pyogenic liver abscess (PLA) could result due to compromised colonic mucosal barrier in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). Association of PLA and CRC is unclear. Evidence is weak and limited to small sized studies. As a result, the need for colonoscopy in PLA patients is debatable.MethodsWe conducted a comprehensive search of multiple electronic databases and conference proceedings (from inception through January 2019) to identify studies that reported on the prevalence of CRC in PLA patients. Our goals were to evaluate the pooled rate of CRC in patients with cryptogenic PLA.Results12 studies were included in the analysis. 18,607 patients were diagnosed with PLA in study group and 60,130 patients were in control group. 63% were males in the age range of 56–94 years. 90.5% of the colonic lesions were left sided and 93.1% were positive for Klebsiella pneumoniae. The pooled rate of prevalence of CRC was 7.9% (95% CI (confidence interval) 5–12.1, I² = 92.4, relative risk = 6.6) in patients with PLA, as compared to 1.2% (95% CI 0.3–5.7, I² = 93.4) in control, with statistical significance (p = 0.001 respectively).ConclusionOur study, albeit limited by heterogeneity, demonstrates that patients with cryptogenic PLA are at a 7-fold risk of having CRC. A screening colonoscopy may be considered in population with cryptogenic PLA, especially if positive for K. pneumoniae. Well-conducted studies are needed to answer this question.     

Cancer-risk by family history and mismatch-repair mutation in Lynch syndrome

Abstract

Introduction: Surveillance of Lynch syndrome (LS) is recommended to reduce cancer-risk. There is an increased awareness that cancer-risk may vary with mismatch-repair mutation and family history. However, gene-specific and family-specific surveillance are not recommended. Therefore, we aimed to estimate the cumulative incidence of lesions and to assess the cancer-risk by family history and mismatch-repair mutation (MMR).

Methods: Single-centre retrospective cohort of all individuals (n?=?241) in a specialized institution was conducted.

Results: Forty-eight percent of individuals inherited MSH2 mutations, 32% MLH1, 15% MSH6 and 5% PMS2. The calculated cumulative incidence for any cancer increased with age. By age 70, the cumulative incidence for low-risk, high-risk adenomas and CRC was estimated at 66.6%, 57.7% and 25.7%, respectively. By age 70, the cumulative incidence of endometrial cancer (EC), gastric cancer and urinary tract cancer was estimated at 17.3%, 3.3% and 12.6%, respectively. MLH1 and MSH2 mutation carriers had lower mean age of CRC diagnosis than MSH6 and PMS2 [MLH1:44(CI95% 38–50); MSH2:43(CI95% 40–47); MSH6:52(CI95% 45–59); PMS2:46(CI95% 35–57)]. The risk of EC was higher when family history was present (RR = 2.39, CI95%[1.3;4.6]). MSH6 mutation carriers had higher risk of EC comparative to other MMR mutation carriers (RR = 1.9, p?=?.09). The risk of urinary tract cancer was higher with MSH2 (RR = 8.4, CI95%[2.7;25.9]) and positive family history (RR = 10.8, CI95%[1.4;82.8]).

Conclusion: This cohort demonstrates the effectiveness of LS surveillance and suggests possible tailored surveillance strategies by gene mutation and family history.     

Prevalence and risk factors for insomnia in community-dwelling elderly in northern Taiwan

Background/PurposeTo determine the prevalence and risk factors for insomnia among community-dwelling elderly in northern Taiwan.Materials and methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted among 1358 elderly people (601 men, 44.3%; and 757 women, 55.7%) who had received a senior-citizen health examination between March 2009 and November 2009. Responses to a clinical questionnaire on insomnia (Chinese version of the Athens insomnia scale), mental health (brief symptom rating scale), and 14 physical symptoms were measured.ResultsInsomnia syndrome was found in 41% of individuals; it was more common in women than in men (63.3.0% vs. 36.7%). Multivariate models showed that aging [≥80 years old, odds ratio (OR) = 0.67, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.46–0.93], living with family (OR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.35–0.76), and perceived good health status (OR = 0.58 and 0.71, p<0.05) were associated with a decreased risk of insomnia. Meanwhile, female gender (OR = 1.70, 95% CI: 1.37–2.12), receipt of medication for chronic diseases (OR = 1.64, 95% CI: 1.29–2.08), high brief symptom rating scale score (1.45, 95% CI: 1.32–1.86), perceived poor health status (OR = 1.92 and 1.80, p<0.05), and total physical symptoms (OR = 1.34, 95% CI: 1.08–1.70) were associated with an increased risk of insomnia.ConclusionThe results indicate that the aging process itself is not responsible for the increased prevalence of insomnia often reported in older people. Instead, physical symptoms, receipt of medication for chronic diseases, mental health status, living status, and perceived level of well-being affected the risk of insomnia.     

Association between lifestyle and site-specific advanced colorectal lesions in screening with faecal immunochemical test and sigmoidoscopy

BackgroundLifestyle factors may help to identify individuals at high-risk for colorectal cancer (CRC).AimsTo examine the association between lifestyle, referral for follow-up colonoscopy and proximal neoplasia detection in CRC screening.MethodsIn this observational study, 14,832 individuals aged 50–74 years were invited to faecal immunochemical test (FIT) or sigmoidoscopy screening. Advanced lesions (AL), including advanced adenomas, advanced serrated lesions and CRC were divided according to location: distal-only, or proximal with or without distal AL. We collected information on smoking habit, body mass index and alcohol intake through a questionnaire.ResultsOut of 3,318 FIT and 2,988 sigmoidoscopy participants, 516 (16%) and 338 (11%), respectively, were referred for follow-up colonoscopy after a positive screening test. Two-hundred-and-fifty-six (4%) had distal-only and 119 (2%) proximal AL. In FIT participants, obesity and high alcohol intake were associated with proximal AL; odds ratio (95% confidence interval) 2.68 (1.36–5.26) and 2.16 (1.08–4.30), respectively. In sigmoidoscopy participants, current smoking was associated with proximal AL; 4.58 (2.24–9.38), and current smoking and obesity were associated with referral for colonoscopy; 2.80 (2.02–3.89) and 1.42 (1.01–2.00), respectively.ConclusionCurrent smoking, obesity and high alcohol intake were associated with screen-detected proximal colorectal AL. Current smoking and obesity were associated with referral for follow-up colonoscopy in sigmoidoscopy screening.     

Prevalence of colorectal adenomas in asymptomatic young adults: a window to early intervention?

Objective The prevalence of colorectal adenoma is increasing in the average-risk population. However, little research is available on colorectal adenoma in young adults under age 40. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence and risk factors of colorectal adenoma in 20- to 39-year-old adults. Methods We evaluated 4286 asymptomatic young adults aged 20 to 39 years who underwent first colonoscopy screening as part of an employer-provided health wellness programme at the Health Promotion Centre of Samsung Changwon Hospital, Korea from January 2011 to December 2013. Logistic regression modelling was used to identify risk factors for colorectal adenoma in asymptomatic young adults. Results The prevalence of colorectal adenoma and advanced adenoma was 11.6% (497/4286) and 0.9% (39/4286), respectively. By age group, the prevalence of colorectal adenoma was 5.4% (33/608) in participants aged 20 to 29 years and 12.6% (464/3678) in participants aged 30 to 39. Colorectal adenoma was found in 13.1% (403/3072) of men and 7.7% (94/1214) of women. Increased risk of colorectal adenoma was associated with age over 30 years (OR, 2.37; 95% CI, 1.64–3.42), current smoker status (OR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.14–1.91), and alcohol consumption (OR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.03–1.63). Conclusions Our findings indicate that even if the prevalence of colorectal adenoma was low in young adults aged 20 to 39, being over 30, cigarette smoking, and alcohol consumption can affect young adults who have no other CRC risks.     

A comprehensive risk assessment for nocturnal hypoglycemia in geriatric patients with type 2 diabetes: A single-center case-control study

AimsTo evaluate the overall association between clinically significant nocturnal hypoglycemia (CsNH) and risk factors in geriatric patients with type 2 diabetes.MethodsOverall, 606 geriatric with type 2 diabetes were evaluated for CsNH using Freestyle Libre Pro® (Abbott Diabetes Care, Tokyo, Japan) during October 2018–February 2020. We defined CsNH as blood glucose level <54 mg/dL (3.0 mmol/L). We investigated clinical characteristics and efficacies of hypoglycemic agents and insulin and analyzed CsNH risk factors using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses.ResultsWe enrolled 152 patients each for the CsNH and non-nocturnal hypoglycemia groups. Insulin use (OR = 3.77 [95 % CI: 1.92–7.67]; P = 0.0002), age (OR = 1.06 [95 % CI: 1.01–1.12]; P = 0.0492), estimated glomerular filtration rate (OR = 0.97 [95 % CI: 0.95–0.98]; P = 0.0492), and fasting blood glucose level (OR = 0.94 [95 % CI: 0.91–0.94]; P < 0.0001) were independent CsNH risk factors. The combined results demonstrated a higher predictability of CsNH than each of the individual risk factors.ConclusionsWe identified risk factors that could help predict CsNH in geriatric patients with type 2 diabetes and demonstrated a comprehensive risk factor assessment.     

Colorectal cancer surveillance in Portuguese families with lynch syndrome: a cohort study

Purpose

Lynch syndrome (LS) is associated with a high risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). The aim of this study was to assess the cumulative risk for the development of colorectal adenomas or carcinomas in a LS CRC surveillance program and to audit the quality of the endoscopic procedures.

Methods

We evaluated 147 asymptomatic LS mutation carriers, without previous CRC, in a surveillance program with colonoscopy every 12–18 months, between 2005 and 2016. Data was obtained by retrospective review of colonoscopy reports and hospital clinical files. The main outcome was assessed using Kaplan–Meier curves. Logistic regression was used to study the risk of developing adenomas.

Results

Patients were under surveillance for 1092 observation years (mean, 7.7 years/patient). Most exams presented adequate bowel preparation (83.5%) and 99.2% achieved cecal intubation. The estimated risk for adenomas at age 60 was 75.6% in men (95%CI, 60.5–88.3) and 65.5% in women (95%CI, 50.8–79.7). Male gender (OR 2.4; 95%CI, 1.2–4.9; p?=?0.018) and age at start of surveillance >?40 years (OR 3.7; 95%CI, 1.8–7.7; p?<?0.001) were independent risk factors for adenoma detection. CRC was diagnosed in 11 patients with an estimated cumulative risk at age 60 of 18.4% (95%CI, 9.2–34.8%); 72.7% of CRC were classified as stage I; no patient died from CRC.

Conclusion

A colonoscopic surveillance program in LS patients allowed the detection of adenomas in a large group of mutation carriers and diagnosis of early-stage carcinomas. Our findings may help other teams to adopt similar strategies or to refer patients early to specialized centers.

     

Potential for prevention: a cohort study of colonoscopies and removal of adenomas in a FIT-based colorectal cancer screening programme

Introduction: Evidence suggests that colorectal cancer (CRC) screening using guaiac faecal occult blood tests (gFOBT) reduces the CRC burden by facilitating timely removal of adenomas. Yet, the faecal immunochemical test (FIT) is being implemented in many countries. The aim of this study was to analyse the risk of having adenomas detected when invited for FIT-based screening as compared to those not yet invited.

Material and Methods: The study was designed as a register-based retrospective cohort study. The potential for prevention was estimated as number of individuals who had no adenomas, non-advanced adenomas, and advanced adenomas detected per 1000 invited/not yet invited individuals and the relative risk (RR) of each of the three outcomes.

Results: A total of 1,359,340 individuals were included, 29.6% of whom had been invited and 70.4% had not yet been invited to participate in CRC screening. Compared with the not yet invited population, the invited group had a RR of no adenomas of 2.28 (2.22–2.34) and a RR of advanced adenomas of 7.41 (6.93–7.91). The RR of colonoscopy was 2.93 (2.87–2.99) for the invited population compared with the not yet invited population.

Conclusion: The RR of having a colonoscopy was three times higher among those invited compared to those not yet invited for CRC screening and twice as often those who had been invited compared to those not yet invited had no adenomas detected. Still, the risk of advanced adenomas was more than seven times higher among the invited population, indicating that the screening programme holds great potential for reducing the CRC burden.

Abbreviations: CI: Confidence interval; CRC: Colorectal cancer; FIT: Faecal immunochemical test; ICD: International Classification of Disease; RR: Relative risk     

Metabolically Healthy Obesity Is Associated with an Increased Risk of Colorectal Adenoma Occurrence Diagnosed by Surveillance Colonoscopy

Background/AimsThe risk of recurrence of colorectal adenoma among obese individuals without metabolic abnormalities or in those with metabolically healthy obesity is largely unexplored. Therefore, we longitudinally investigated the risk of adenoma occurrence in individuals undergoing surveillance colonoscopy according to metabolic status and obesity.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study included 16,872 Korean adults who underwent their first screening colonoscopy between 2003 and 2012 and who then underwent follow-up colonoscopy until 2017. Participants were categorized into a metabolically healthy nonobese group (reference group), a metabolically healthy obese group, a metabolically abnormal nonobese group, and a metabolically abnormal obese group. Hazard ratios (HRs) for adenoma recurrence compared to the reference group were calculated in each group.ResultsDuring a median follow-up duration of 47.3 months (interquartile range, 35.6 to 58.9 months), 3,673 (21.8%) and 292 (1.73%) participants developed adenoma and advanced adenoma, respectively. When age, sex, smoking, alcohol consumption, family history of colorectal cancer, and baseline adenoma risk were adjusted, the risk of adenoma recurrence was increased in metabolically healthy obese individuals (HR, 1.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12 to 1.57) and metabolically abnormal obese individuals (HR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.08 to 1.30) but not in metabolically abnormal nonobese individuals (HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.94 to 1.13).ConclusionsIn this study, metabolically healthy obese individuals and metabolically abnormal obese individuals exhibited increased risks of occurrence of colorectal adenoma diagnosed by surveillance colonoscopy. This finding implies that obesity itself, even without metabolic abnormalities, is associated with an increased risk of adenoma recurrence. ^{(Gut Liver} 2021;15-390⁾     

Risk of colorectal neoplasia in patients with celiac disease: A multicenter study

Background and aimsThe association of celiac disease with colorectal neoplasia is controversial. The aim of this study was to determine the risk of colorectal neoplasia among patients with celiac disease.MethodsWe carried out a multicenter, retrospective case–control study, within four community hospitals. Celiac disease patients with a complete colonoscopy were regarded as cases and those without celiac disease as controls. For each case, two controls matched for age, sex, indication for colonoscopy and colorectal cancer family history, were randomly selected. The main outcome evaluated was risk of colorectal polyps, adenomas, advanced neoplastic lesions and cancer.ResultsWe identified 118 patients with celiac disease and 236 controls. The risk of polyps, adenomas and advanced neoplastic lesions was similar in both groups (OR 1.25, CI 0.71–2.18, p = 0.40; OR 1.39, CI 0.73–2.63, p = 0.31; and OR 1.00, CI 0.26–3.72, p = 1.00, respectively). On multivariate analysis, age > 75 years old, and first-grade CRC family history were associated with adenomas (OR 2.68 CI 1.03–6.98, OR 6.68 CI 1.03–47.98 respectively) and advanced neoplastic lesions (OR 15.03, CI 2.88–78.3; OR 6.46 CI 1.23–33.79, respectively). With respect to celiac disease characteristic, a low adherence to a gluten free diet was independently associated with the presence of adenomas (OR 6.78 CI 1.39–33.20 p = 0.01).ConclusionsCeliac disease was not associated with an increased risk of colorectal neoplasia. Nonadherence to a strict gluten free diet was associated with the presence of adenomas. Further studies addressing celiac disease characteristics are needed to confirm this observation.