Emergency department sepsis screening tool decreases time to antibiotics in patients with sepsis

Recent literature has highlighted the importance of early identification and treatment of sepsis; however, limited data exists to help recognize sepsis in the emergency department (ED) through use of a screening tool. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of a sepsis screening tool implemented in an academic medical center ED on compliance with the 3-hour sepsis bundle.This was a retrospective cohort study that included a total of 115 patients, of which 58 were in the pre-tool group and 57 were in the post-tool group. There was no difference in 3-hour bundle compliance between groups (36.2% vs. 47.4%, P?=?0.26). There was no difference in the following bundle components: lactate (79.3% vs. 80.7%, P?=?0.85), blood cultures (86.2% vs. 96.5%, P?=?0.09), blood cultures before administering antibiotics (91.4% vs. 100%, P?=?0.57) and adequate fluids administration (44.7% vs. 41.9%, P?=?0.820). A significantly higher number of patients received antibiotics within 3?h in the post-tool group (58.6% vs. 89.5%, P?<?0.001). Statistically significant secondary outcomes included average time to antibiotics (P?=?0.04), administering antibiotics within an hour (P?>?0.001), and ICU length of stay (P?=?0.03). There was no difference in 30-day mortality, however mortality was numerically lower in the post-tool group (36.2% vs. 26.3%, P?=?0.25).Although implementation of an ED sepsis screening tool did not increase 3-hour bundle compliance, it did increase the proportion of patients receiving timely antimicrobial therapy and demonstrated a trend towards decreased mortality.     

Impact of SEP-1 on broad-spectrum combination antibiotic therapy in the emergency department

BackgroundThe SEP-1 measures have tied financial reimbursement to the treatment of patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of a SEP-1 initiative on the utilization of broad-spectrum combination therapy (BSCT) in the emergency department (ED).MethodsThis was an IRB-approved, retrospective evaluation of adult patients who received vancomycin plus an antipseudomonal beta-lactam for a urinary tract infection (UTI) or skin or soft tissue infection (SSTI) in the ED. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients in which use of BSCT was considered appropriate based on clinical criteria. Secondary outcomes included door to antibiotic order time, door to administration time, proportion of patients continued on BSCT upon admission, duration of BSCT, and in-hospital mortality.ResultsA total of 400 patients were included in the analysis. Following SEP-1 implementation, appropriate use of BSCT decreased by 12%, with 54% of patients in the pre-SEP-1 group meeting clinical criteria compared to 42% in the post-SEP-1 group (p = 0.028). In the subgroup of patients with a suspected UTI the appropriate use of BSCT declined by 25% (40% vs 15%, p = 0.005). The median door to first antibiotic administration time was not significantly different between groups (63 min vs 61 min, p = 0.091).ConclusionsThe implementation of the SEP-1 mandated measures was associated with an increase in the unnecessary use of BSCT. Additionally, no difference was seen in time to antibiotic administration. The results of this study demonstrate the negative impact that the SEP-1 mandate may have on antimicrobial utilization within the ED.     

Timing of antibiotics in febrile children meeting sepsis criteria at a paediatric emergency department

Objective

Delay in antibiotic administration in paediatric sepsis is associated with increased mortality and prolonged organ dysfunction. This pre-intervention study evaluated performance in paediatric sepsis management.

Methods

Retrospective cohort study of febrile children admitted through the ED at The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, between 1 May and 31 July 2017. Participants were children aged 29 days to 60 months excluding children with simple febrile seizures, neonates and children who had received intravenous antibiotics elsewhere. We assessed the timing of antibiotic administration in children meeting local sepsis guidelines. We conducted a survey of clinicians in ED in 2018 to describe contributing factors.

Results

There were 160 febrile children admitted and 144 presentations were included in the analysis. Male 53% (n = 76); median age 20.1 months (interquartile range [IQR] 3.9–37 months). Thirty-seven (26%) febrile children met local sepsis criteria. The median time from triage to first dose of intravenous antibiotic was 109 min (IQR 62–183 min). Delay (>60 min) occurred in 26 (76%) children. Reported reasons contributing to delay included high patient load, long waiting times, difficult intravenous access, delayed prescribing, inadequate staffing and difficulty distinguishing between a viral infection and serious bacterial infection.

Conclusion

There was frequent delay in administering antibiotics in children meeting local sepsis criteria, more commonly in young infants. Reasons contributing to delay were specific to young children along with departmental factors that will require addressing through targeted quality improvement interventions.     

The association between time to antibiotics and relevant clinical outcomes in emergency department patients with various stages of sepsis: a prospective multi-center study

IntroductionIn early sepsis stages, optimal treatment could contribute to prevention of progression to severe sepsis. Therefore, we investigated if there was an association between time to antibiotics and relevant clinical outcomes in hospitalized emergency department (ED) patients with mild to severe sepsis stages.MethodsThis is a prospective multicenter study in three Dutch EDs. Patients were stratified into three categories of illness severity, as assessed by the predisposition, infection, response, and organ failure (PIRO) score: PIRO score 1 to 7, 8 to 14 and >14 points, reflected low, intermediate, and high illness severity, respectively. Consecutive hospitalized ED patients with a suspected infection who were treated with intravenous antibiotics were eligible to participate in the study. The primary outcome measure was the number of surviving days outside the hospital at day 28 which was used as an inverse measure of hospital length of stay (LOS). The secondary outcome measure was 28-day mortality, taking into account the time to mortality.Multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to estimate the association between time to antibiotics and the primary and secondary outcome measures corrected for confounders, including appropriateness of antibiotics and initial ED resuscitation, in three categories of illness severity.ResultsOf the 1,168 included patients, 112 died (10%), while 85% and 95% received antibiotics within three and six hours, respectively. No association between time to antibiotics and surviving days outside the hospital or mortality was found. Only in PIRO group 1 to 7 was delayed administration of antibiotics (>3 hours) associated with an increase in surviving days outside the hospital at day 28 (hazard ratio: 1.46, 95% confidence interval: 1.05 to 2.02 after correction for potential confounders).ConclusionsIn ED patients with mild to severe sepsis who received antibiotics within six hours after ED presentation, a reduction in time to antibiotics was not found to be associated with an improvement in relevant clinical outcomes.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13054-015-0936-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.     

Use of a protocolized approach to the management of sepsis can improve time to first dose of antibiotics

Purpose

The Surviving Sepsis Guidelines established recommendations for early recognition and rapid treatment of patients with sepsis. Recognizing systemic difficulties that delayed the application of early goal-directed therapy, the Emergency Department and Critical Care leadership instituted a sepsis protocol to identify patients with sepsis and expedite antibiotic delivery. We aimed to determine if the sepsis protocol improved the time to first dose of antibiotics in patients diagnosed with sepsis.

Materials and methods

We performed a retrospective chart review of patients with sepsis comparing the time from antibiotic order placement to the first dose of antibiotic therapy over a 3-year period. Patients who received vancomycin and ciprofloxacin underwent additional subgroup analysis, as these antibiotics were made available by protocol for use without infectious disease consultation.

Results

The average time to first dose of antibiotics for the presepsis protocol group was 160 minutes, and the average time for the sepsis protocol group was 99 minutes. Fifty-eight patients received vancomycin, and 30 received ciprofloxacin, with a decrease in time of 65 minutes and 41 minutes, respectively.

Conclusions

Initiation of a sepsis protocol, which emphasizes early goal-directed therapy, can improve time to administration of first dose of antibiotics.     

严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克的急诊集束化治疗依从性调查分析

目的 调查严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克在急诊患者中的发生率以及针对严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克早期集束化治疗的依从性.方法 选择2009年5月至6月由救护车送至上海交通大学医学院附属瑞金医院急诊科的患者为调查对象,统计严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克的发生率,对符合诊断标准的患者分别统计早期复苏集束化治疗各项指标完成的依从性.结果 共纳入急诊就诊患者917例,其中符合严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克诊断标准者96例,发生率为10.47%.在符合诊断标准的患者中,早期复苏集束化治疗、使用抗菌药物前留取病原学标本、2 h内放置深静脉导管并监测中心静脉压(CVP)与中心静脉血氧饱和度(ScvO2)、3 h内使用广谱抗菌药物、6 h内早期目标导向治疗(EGDT)达标、12 h内乳酸下降或原乳酸≤2 mmol/L的依从性分别为1.04%、3.12%、2.08%、83.33%、1.04%、23.96%,急诊内科各指标的依从性依次为1.19%、3.57%、2.38%、83.33%、1.19%、26.19%,急诊外科各指标的依从性依次为0、0、0、83.33%、0、8.33%,急诊内、外科依从性比较差异均无统计学意义(均P＞0.05).结论 严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克在急诊就诊患者中占相当比例,但医师的认识不足;早期集束化治疗依从性较低,需加大指南的教育及执行程度.

Abstract：

Objective To evaluate the occurrence of severe sepsis and septic shock and the rate of compliance with sepsis bundle in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock in emergency department.Methods A prospective study was conducted on consecutive adult patients who were sent to Emergency Department of Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine by ambulance from May to June in 2009. The occurrence of severe sepsis and septic shock, and the number of the patients in whom who met the criteria of compliance with sepsis bundle were analyzed. Results Nine hundred and seventeen patients who were sent to the emergency department by ambulance in that period were enrolled in the study.The number of patients with severe sepsis and septic shock was 96. The incidence of severe sepsis and septic shock was 10.47%. Among these patients, the number of patients in whom the sepsis bundle was complied,i.e. sepsis bundle, appropriate cultures were taken before antimicrobial therapy, placement of central venous catheter and monitoring of central venous pressure(CVP)as well as central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2)within 2 hours, antibiotic therapy within 3 hours, early goal-directed therapy(EGDT)within 6 hours, and lactate clearance in 12 hours reached 1.04%, 3. 12%, 2.08%, 83. 33%, 1.04%, 23.96%.The results were 1.19%, 3. 57%, 2.38%, 83.33%, 1.19%, 26.19% and 0, 0, 0, 83.33%, 0, 8. 33% in medical and surgical emergency department respectively. There was no statistical difference between the two divisions(all P＞0. 05). Conclusion The incidence of severe sepsis and septic shock was high in emergency department, but the rate of recognition of it and the compliance with sepsis bundle were inadequate. It is urgently necessary to enhance the learning and implementation of the guideline.     

Effectiveness of measures to reduce emergency department waiting times: a natural experiment

Objectives

To determine what measures were introduced by emergency departments in response to the national monitoring week in March 2003, and which, if any, of these were most effective in reducing waiting times.

Methods

A postal survey of all emergency departments in England was undertaken to gather data on measures taken. Department waiting times before, during, and after monitoring week were determined from data held by the Department of Health and linked to the survey data for analysis.

Results

A total of 111/198 responses (56%) were received. Departments had taken a wide range of measures to improve waiting times. The commonest were additional senior doctor hours (39%), creation of a “four hour monitor” role (37%), improved access to emergency beds (36%), additional non‐clinical staff hours (33%), additional junior doctor hours (32%), additional nursing hours (29%), and triage by senior staff (28%). In 35 departments (32%) no changes were made at all to usual practice. The biggest influence on improved performance during monitoring week was the number of measures that a department took, rather than any specific measure, although there was weak evidence that additional junior medical and non‐clinical staff time may have contributed more than other measures.

Conclusions

Improved waiting time performance may depend, at least in the short term, more on the amount of effort expended than on introducing a single effective change. In addition, those measures most likely to be helpful are likely also to require additional resources.     

Prognostic value of mortality in emergency department sepsis score, procalcitonin, and C-reactive protein in patients with sepsis at the emergency department

The prognostic value of procalcitonin (PCT) in patients with sepsis at the emergency department (ED) has not been evaluated. We conducted a prospective observational study to compare the prognostic value of PCT on sepsis and compared with a validated score, Mortality in Emergency Department Sepsis (MEDS) score, and C-reactive protein (CRP) in the setting of ED of an urban, university-based medical center. Five hundred twenty-five consecutive adult patients admitted to the ED fulfilling the American College of Clinical Pharmacists/Society of Critical Care Medicine Consensus Conference definition of sepsis were prospectively enrolled. Serum PCT and CRP were evaluated for each patient. Clinical characteristics and laboratory results on ED admission were recorded using a standardized form. Each patient was followed for at least 30 days. The main outcome was early (5-day) and late (6- to 30-day) mortality. The median age of the study sample was 64.0 (interquartile range, 47-76) years old, and the overall 30-day mortality rate was 10.5%. The c-statistic in the prediction of early mortality was 0.89 for MEDS, 0.76 for PCT, and 0.68 for CRP. The c-statistic in the prediction of late mortality was 0.78 for MEDS, 0.70 for PCT, and 0.63 for CRP. Overall, MEDS score has the best discriminative capability among the three tested markers. Under the best cutoff value, PCT was the most sensitive, and MEDS score was the most specific marker. We suggest further combining the information on PCT and MEDS score to enhance the accuracy in predicting ED sepsis mortality.     

Resident productivity as a function of emergency department volume,shift time of day,and cumulative time in the emergency department

Objectives

We sought to determine if resident productivity changed based on emergency department (ED) volume, shift time of day, or over time during a shift.

Methods

This is a retrospective review of patients evaluated in the ED by emergency medicine residents. Data were collected using the computerized tracker that provides time of physician assignment and daily volume. Regression analysis was used to determine relationship between productivity and volume as well as relationship between productivity and accumulated time in the ED. Analysis of variance was used to assess for productivity differences by shift time of day.

Results

One hundred sixty-one postgraduate year-1 (PGY-1), 264 PGY-2, and 193 PGY-3 shifts were included. PGY-1, PGY-2, and PGY-3 residents saw 0.85, 1.13, and 1.25 patients per hour, respectively. PGY-3 and PGY-2 productivity had a weak relationship to ED volume (R = 0.28, P = .03; and R = 0.36, P = .03), whereas PGY-1 productivity had a moderate relationship to ED volume (R = 0.44, P = .0001). There were no differences in productivity based on shift time of day. Accumulated time in the ED had a strongly negative relationship to productivity, with R values from −0.79 to −0.93 (P < .002 for all comparisons).

Conclusions

Resident productivity is not strongly linked to volume or time of day. If specific times have statistically higher volume, they should be staffed with larger numbers of residents. In addition, emergency medicine resident productivity declines reliably over shift time. Therefore, scheduling should be adjusted to create larger shift overlaps to aid in smoother patient flow.     

急诊病房患者脓毒症患病现状及病原菌分析

目的探讨急诊病房患者脓毒症患病现状,并对其病原菌进行分析。方法收集2004年1月至2006年12月急诊病房患者病例资料,调查分析脓毒症患病情况及病原菌,行Chi—Square检验。结果三年间出院6949人,符合脓毒症诊断标准260例,年患病率为3．4％、3．7％、4．1％。死亡118例,病死率45．4％,年病死率为49．3％、46．4％、41．9％。严重脓毒症159例,病死率60．4％（96／159）;MODS101例,病死率73．3％（74／101）;脓毒性休克73例,病死率84．9％（62／73）;脏器功能障碍多于3个46例,病死率91．3％（42／46）。患病率和病死率在≥60岁组（4．0％、47．3％）高于〈60岁组（2．2％、23．8％,P〈0．05）,男性与女性间差异无统计学意义。原发感染部位主要为下呼吸道感染45．8％,皮肤感染18．5％,消化道感染15．8％,泌尿道感染15．0％。院内感染相关脓毒症27．3％。分离病原菌201株,其中G^-菌99株（49．3％）、G^＋菌43株（21．4％）,真菌59株（29．4％）。结论急诊病房有较高的脓毒症患病率和病死率,G^-菌和真菌为主要致病菌,故应重视脓毒症致病菌防治。     

Predictors of early progression to severe sepsis or shock among emergency department patients with nonsevere sepsis

Background

Progression from nonsevere sepsis—i.e., sepsis without organ failure or shock—to severe sepsis or shock among emergency department (ED) patients has been associated with significant mortality. Early recognition in the ED of those who progress to severe sepsis or shock during their hospital course may improve patient outcomes. We sought to identify clinical, demographic, and laboratory parameters that predict progression to severe sepsis, septic shock, or death within 96 h of ED triage among patients with initial presentation of nonsevere sepsis.

Methods

This is a retrospective cohort of patients presenting to a single urban academic ED from November 2008 to October 2010. Patients aged 18 years or older who met criteria for sepsis and had a lactate level measured in the ED were included. Patients were excluded if they had any combination of the following: a systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg upon triage, an initial whole blood lactate level ≥4 mmol/L, or one or more of a set of predefined signs of organ dysfunction upon initial assessment. Disease progression was defined as the development of any combination of the aforementioned conditions, initiation of vasopressors, or death within 96 h of ED presentation. Data on predefined potential predictors of disease progression and outcome measures of disease progression were collected by a query of the electronic medical record and via chart review. Logistic regression was used to assess associations of potential predictor variables with a composite outcome measure of sepsis progression to organ failure, hypotension, or death.

Results

In this cohort of 582 ED patients with nonsevere sepsis, 108 (18.6 %) experienced disease progression. Initial serum albumin <3.5 mg/dL (OR 4.82; 95 % CI 2.40–9.69; p?<?0.01) and a diastolic blood pressure <52 mmHg at ED triage (OR 4.59; 95 % CI 1.57–13.39; p?<?0.01) were independently associated with disease progression to severe sepsis or shock within 96 h of ED presentation. There were no deaths within 96 h of ED presentation.

Conclusions

In our patient cohort, serum albumin <3.5 g/dL and an ED triage diastolic blood pressure <52 mmHg independently predict early progression to severe sepsis or shock among ED patients with presumed sepsis.

     

Interventions to improve patient-centered care during times of emergency department crowding

Patient-centered care is defined by the Institute of Medicine (IOM) as care that is responsive to individual patient needs and values and that guides treatment decisions. This article is the result of a breakout session of the 2011 Academic Emergency Medicine consensus conference "Interventions to Assure Quality in the Crowded Emergency Department" and focuses on three broad domains of patient-centered care: patient satisfaction, patient involvement, and care related to patient needs.The working group provided background information and an overview of interventions that have been conducted in the domains of patient satisfaction, patient involvement (patients' preferences and values in decision-making), and patient needs (e.g., comfort, information, education). Participants in the breakout session discussed interventions reported in the medical literature as well as initiated at their institutions, discussed the effect of crowding on patient-centered care, and prioritized, in a two-step voting process, five areas of focus for establishing a research agenda for studying patient-centered care during times of crowding. The research priorities for enhancing patient-centered care in all three domains during periods of crowding are discussed. These include assessing the effect of other quality domains on patient satisfaction and determining the effects of changes in ED operations on patient satisfaction; enhancing patient involvement by determining the effect of digital records and health information technology (HIT); rapid assessment areas with focused patient-provider communication; and meeting patients' needs through flexible staffing, use of HIT to enhance patient communication, discharge instructions, and postdischarge telephone calls.