共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 31 毫秒
1.
《Modern rheumatology / the Japan Rheumatism Association》2013,23(6):858-864
Purpose. To conduct a national survey of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients treated with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). Based on current information on the use of MMF, we aimed to evaluate its efficacy and safety for childhood-onset (c-) SLE.Target. We evaluated 115 patients by questionnaire on MMF use for c-SLE in medical facilities specializing in pediatric rheumatic and renal diseases.Results. Average age at SLE onset was 10.6 (range, 2–15) years; average age at the time of starting MMF was 12.3 (range, 2–15) years. Average dose per body surface area was 1,059.3 mg/m2/day. Corticosteroid dosing was 20.9 mg/day before treatment but 7.7 mg/day after treatment. Laboratory values before and after MMF treatment were as follows: C3 increased from 67.0 to 84.9 mg/dl (p < 0.001), C4 increased from 10.2 to 15.1 mg/dl (p < 0.001), and anti-DNA antibody decreased from 154.2 to 18.4 IU/ml (p < 0.001). 24 adverse events in 21 cases were reported, but MMF was not discontinued in any.Conclusions. The amount of MMF for c-SLE in Japan is similar to the standard dose in other countries. Reduction of corticosteroid dose and improvement of laboratory values represent efficacy of MMF. The side effects recorded here indicated tolerability of the drug. 相似文献
2.
3.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) for inducing and/or maintaining
remission of lupus nephritis (LN). This is a retrospective study of 25 LN patients consecutively treated with MMF. The primary
outcome was complete renal remission (CR) defined by urine protein/creatinine ratio ≤0.5 g/g and inactive urine sediment and
serum creatinine within <15% above baseline. For induction, 21 episodes of active, moderate to severe LN were treated with
MMF. Twelve cases (57%) achieved CR over a median of 8.5 months. Of 13 patients who had LN for <12 months and took ≥2 g/day of MMF, 11 achieved CR, compared to one out of the eight patients who did not meet both criteria (p = 0.0022). For maintenance therapy, 15 patients received MMF for a median of 20 months (range 5–55 months). Two patients
(13%) experienced renal flares while taking MMF. Most adverse events were transient and did not require change in therapy.
This study suggests that MMF is an effective treatment for both induction and maintenance of remission of moderate to severe
LN with a relatively favorable safety profile. Early treatment and a dose ≥2 g/day are essential for optimal outcome. CR may
take >6 months. 相似文献
4.
Maryam SAHEBARI Mojgan AFKHAMIZADEH Kamila HASHEMZADEH Masoud PEZESHKI RAD 《International journal of rheumatic diseases》2010,13(2):175-179
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease in which organs undergo damage. Hypoparathyroidism is a rare disease, which presents in two forms: hereditary and acquired. Cases of hypoparathyroidism and SLE rarely co‐exist. Only six cases have been reported; five of them first presented with lupus and then hypoparathyroidism or simultaneously. We present here developing lupus disease in a woman who had idiopathic hypoparathyroidism. According to increasing data about the autoimmune origin of idiopathic hypoparathyroidism, these case reports suggest that there may be an autoimmune process linking these diseases. 相似文献
5.
《Modern rheumatology / the Japan Rheumatism Association》2013,23(6):854-857
Objectives. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is used as one of the standard induction/maintenance protocols for lupus nephritis (LN). However, MMF has not been approved for treating LN in any country, resulting in worldwide off-label use of this immunosuppressant. In order to clarify the real-world use of MMF as a treatment for LN in Japan, Japan College of Rheumatology surveyed the use of MMF in daily clinical practice.Methods. Adult patients with LN who visited enrolled hospitals from October 2008 to September 2013 were surveyed for the initial, maximum, and maintenance doses of MMF. The safety and efficacy of MMF were retrospectively evaluated.Results. One hundred and thirty-seven LN patients including 116 females were enrolled. The median of initial, maximum, and maintenance doses of MMF were 1.0 g/day, 1.5 g/day, and 1.0 g/day, respectively. Sixty-one adverse events were reported in 39 patients during the follow-up period. Median urine protein level decreased from 1.89 g/gCr to 0.21 g/gCr, meanC3 level increased from 66.4 mg/dl to 80.3 mg/dl, and median anti-DNA antibody titer decreased from 40.6 IU/ml to 10.6 IU/ml.Conclusion. MMF was commonly used for the treatment of adult LN patients with acceptable efficacy and safety in Japan. 相似文献
6.
霉酚酸酯对系统性红斑狼疮患者免疫功能的影响 总被引:1,自引:1,他引:1
目的 观察新型免疫抑制剂霉酚酸酯(MMF)对系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)免疫功能的影响。方法 应用ELISA法、间接免疫荧光法和流式细胞术观察MMF、环磷酰胺(CTX)治疗前后SLE患者血清IL-6、IL-8、NTFα、sIL-2R、ANA、A-dsDNA及淋巴细胞亚群的变化以及MMF、CTX对造血系统、肝脏、肾脏功能的影响。结果 SLE患者经MMF治疗3个月后血清IL-6、IL-8、TNF-α、sIL-2R、ANA、A-dsDNA水平显著下降,CD3^ 、CD4^ 、CD4^ 、CD45RA^ 细胞显著增高,CD8^ 、CD4?^ CD45RO^ 、CD86 CD45RA^ 、CD8^ CD45RO^ 细胞显著减少。对造血系统、肝脏、肾脏功能无明显损害。结论 MMF可选择性地抑制T、B淋巴细胞,是一种治疗SLE毒副作用较少的新型免疫抑制剂。 相似文献
7.
《Modern rheumatology / the Japan Rheumatism Association》2013,23(4):618-625
AbstractObjectives. To examine the efficacy and safety of multi-target therapy using tacrolimus (TAC), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and a steroid as initial treatment for active lupus nephritis (LN).Methods. We conducted a retrospective analysis of the data of 16 consecutive patients who received the multi-target therapy for active Classes III–V LN at our department. We also compared the outcomes of the multi-target therapy with those of TAC therapy (TAC + steroid), a study of which we had conducted previously in 13 patients with active LN (TAC group).Results. All the patients treated with multi-target therapy achieved complete remission (CR) (mean, 4.6 ± 3.8 months; range, 1–15 months). The clinical profiles of the patients of the multi-target group were similar to those of the TAC group at baseline, except for a significantly higher level of proteinuria (4.6 ± 2.8 vs. 2.5 ± 2.1 g/gCr, p = 0.033) in the former. The CR rate at 6 months was significantly higher in the multi-target group as compared with that in the TAC group (81% vs. 38%, p = 0.018). Two cases of serious adverse events were associated with cytomegalovirus infection in the multi-target group, namely gastric ulcer and pancytopenia, both of which were successfully treated by antiviral therapy.Conclusions. Multi-target therapy was effective as initial treatment for active LN, with CR achieved early and in a high percentage of patients. Although this therapy was generally well tolerated, it is important to bear in mind the associated risk of cytomegalovirus infection. 相似文献
8.
Hentgen V Granel B Dodé C Cuisset L Delpech M Grateau G 《La Revue de médecine interne / fondée ... par la Société nationale francaise de médecine interne》2003,24(12):781-785
PURPOSE: Tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily 1A associated periodic syndrome (TRAPS) belongs to the group of hereditary fever syndromes, also called hereditary auto-inflammatory syndromes. CURRENT KNOWLEDGE AND KEY POINTS: The diagnosis of TRAPS should be evoked in presence of the following clinical signs, whatever the population of the affected patients. TRAPS acute inflammatory access, of 1 to 3 weeks' duration, is characterised by the presence of fever, abdominal pain, myalgias, various types of skin rash including erysepela-like erythema. Long term inflammatory response can lead to AA amyloidosis. Genetic testing will confirm the diagnosis when showing a mutation in the extracellular part of the TNFRSF1A receptor. Therapeutic management of TRAPS is not definitely established. Daily colchicine does not seem to prevent efficiently inflammatory attacks. Corticosteroids, in contrast can attenuate the intensity and diminish the duration of attacks. FUTURE PROSPECTS AND PROJECTS: The value of biological agents that inhibits TNF action is not yet completely determined in TRAPS. Mechanisms of the disease are not yet elucidated. In some families with specific mutations, a relative soluble TNF receptor deficiency has been found in the plasma. However this mechanism does not account for what is observed in other kindreds. 相似文献
9.
吗替麦考酚酯治疗弥漫增生性狼疮性肾炎的多中心临床研究 总被引:24,自引:0,他引:24
目的 多中心、前瞻性观察吗替麦考酚酯 (MMF)治疗弥漫增生性狼疮性肾炎的临床疗效和不良反应。方法 全国 9家医院共收集系统性红斑狼疮患者 75例 (男 1 3例 ,女 62例 ) ,均经肾活检确定为活动性弥漫增生性狼疮性肾炎 (LN IV) ,年龄 (31 0± 1 0 1 )岁 ,病程 (38 9± 52 5)个月 ;其中经正规激素联合环磷酰胺治疗无效者 2 6例 ,复发者 2 1例 ,初治患者 2 8例。治疗方案采用激素联合MMF。MMF起始剂量为 0 5~ 2 0g/d ,随访时间≥ 6个月。 38例治疗后行重复肾活检 ,并进行急性指数 (AI)、慢性指数 (CI)、免疫球蛋白 (Ig)及补体沉积半定量评分。结果 MMF平均起始剂量 (1 2 6±0 30 )g/d ,治疗 3、6个月时MMF平均剂量分别为 (1 2 1± 0 30 )g/d、(0 95± 0 33)g/d。治疗 3个月狼疮活动分数 (SLE DAI)由 1 6 9± 6 7降为 8 1± 4 8(P <0 0 1 ) ,血红蛋白由 (92± 2 1 )g/L升至 (1 1 2± 2 8)g/L(P <0 0 5) ,尿蛋白由 (4 2 4± 2 66)g/d降至 (2 1 8± 3 75)g/d(P <0 0 5) ,血清白蛋白升至 (35 3±6 9)g/L(P <0 0 1 ) ,肾功能明显改善 ,无活动性尿沉渣 ;治疗 6个月尿蛋白继续下降至 (1 54± 1 60 )g/d ,血红蛋白、血清白蛋白继续升高。血清A dsDNA抗体阳性及低补体血症患者比例显著降低。 相似文献
10.
11.
Baca V Montiel G Meillón L Pizzuto J Catalán T Juan-Shum L Nieva B 《American journal of hematology》2002,71(3):200-207
We report a severe hemorrhagic disorder in two pediatric patients with lupus anticoagulant (LA) associated to acquired factor II (prothrombin) deficiency. In both patients, hemorrhagic symptoms resolved after corticosteroid therapy. Serial coagulation studies showed that Staclot LA assay was more sensitive than DVVconfirm and Staclot PNP tests to confirm the presence of LA when associated with severe factor II deficiency. Both patients had non-neutralizing anti-prothrombin antibodies and their titers inversely correlated with factor II activity (r = -1.0, P < 0.0001). Associated findings in these patients included positive immunologic tests for systemic lupus erythematosus, a positive anti-cardiolipin antibody, and anti-beta(2) GPI antibodies in one case. Our findings point out the difficulty in diagnosing LA associated with acquired factor II deficiency and suggest that, in confirmation of its phospholipid dependency, the inclusion of a source of normal human plasma in the test sequence to correct for any factor deficiency and a confirmatory step utilizing hexagonal (II) phase phospholipids may be crucial to the diagnosis of LA in some patients with LA-hypoprothrombinemia syndrome. 相似文献
12.
Tak Mao CHAN 《International journal of rheumatic diseases》2006,9(4):403-407
After nearly two decades of relative requiescence, a plethora of new drugs or biologic agents are currently being studied for their therapeutic potential in lupus nephritis. While corticosteroid remains an indispensable component in induction treatment for severe proliferative lupus nephritis, the advent of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) offers an alternative to cyclophosphamide (CTX), thereby reducing the occurrence of treatment‐related adverse effects, especially in patients requiring multiple courses of therapy for flares. Data on the high treatment efficacy and favourable tolerability of MMF were first reported in Chinese patients with diffuse proliferative lupus nephritis. The improved safety profile of MMF was subsequently confirmed in patients of Caucasian, Hispanic, or African origin, in whom comparable or even better treatment efficacy compared with CTX was observed. However, the response rates differed between these studies. This review aims to provide a succinct update on the reported experience that compared MMF with other immunosuppressive agents in the treatment of lupus nephritis. Considering potential ethnic differences in the disease course and/or treatment response, it remains to be examined whether the favourable long‐term clinical outcomes observed in Chinese patients with corticosteroid and MMF as continuous treatment from induction to maintenance could be reproduced in patients of other ethnic origins. In addition, the relative merit and cost‐effectiveness of MMF against alternative maintenance immunosuppressive agents in the prevention of disease flares deserve further investigation. 相似文献
13.
Mohammad Hassan Moradinejad 《Rheumatology international》2009,29(9):1113-1115
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease of unknown etiology with multisystem involvement. A number
of pulmonary complications including pleuritis, pneumonitis, infectious pneumonia, and pulmonary hemorrhage, have been reported
in patients with SLE. Pulmonary hemorrhage is a major life-threatening manifestation in children and adolescents with SLE.
Mycophenolate mofetil is an immunosuppressive agent used in solid organ transplantation, and it may play an increasing role
in autoimmune disease. In this report, we present two cases of childhood SLE with recurrent pulmonary hemorrhage, which were
unresponsive to treatment with high-dose corticosteroids, cytotoxic therapy, IVIG, plasmaphoresis, and supportive therapy,
but responded to IV mycophenolate mofetil. A multimodal therapy including mycophenolate mofetil was effective in treatment
of these two children. 相似文献
14.
Chen Yanxia Huang Xingqi Zheng Sujie Zhu Zhongliang Yang Wei Liu Jinlin 《Clinical rheumatology》2018,37(5):1433-1438
Clinical Rheumatology - Tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated periodic syndrome (TRAPS) is characterized by recurrent episodes of inflammation with fever, abdominal pain, chest pain, rash,... 相似文献
15.
《Modern rheumatology / the Japan Rheumatism Association》2013,23(1):55-60
AbstractProgressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) is a fatal demyelinating disease of the central nervous system caused by an opportunistic infection of the JC virus. PML is known to occur in immunocompromised patients. A patient with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) who developed PML during i.v. cyclophosphamide and methylprednisolone pulse therapy is described. The pertinent literature relating to complication of SLE by PML is discussed. 相似文献
16.
目的 前瞻性研究环磷酰胺治疗无效的难治性狼疮肾炎患者应用他克莫司(FK506)治疗的临床效果和安全性.方法 收集2009年1月至2010年12月门诊或住院的16~60岁的狼疮肾炎患者.入选患者均符合美国风湿病学会(ACR) 1997年修订的系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)分类标准;尿蛋白定量(24h)≥1.5 g;应用环磷酰胺半年累计剂量超过8 g无效.他克莫司起始剂量2~3 mg/d(体质量≥60 kg,3 mg/d;体质量<60 kg,2 mg/d),2个月后临床症状无好转,可逐渐调整剂量至4 mg/d,监测血药浓度,观察期为6个月.疗效评价分为完全缓解、部分缓解和无效,达到完全缓解或部分缓解为有效.统计学处理采用单因素方差分析和Pearson相关分析.结果 收集环磷酰胺治疗无效的狼疮肾炎患者14例,其中男性2例,女性12例,平均年龄(30±9)岁,SLE的平均病程(4±3)年;狼疮肾炎的平均病程(2.7±1.9)年.5例患者尿蛋白定量(24 h)1.5~2.9 g,9例患者尿蛋白定量(24 h)≥3.0 g;9例患者有活动性尿沉渣.应用他克莫司的治疗过程中,尿蛋白定量(24h)水平显著下降,从基线(6.2±5.1)g降至6个月(1.1±0.9)g,差异有统计学意义(F=16.21,P<0.01);血清白蛋白水平呈逐渐上升趋势,从基线(27.9±9.7) g/L升至6个月(37.8±2.2) g/L,差异有统计学意义(F=16.71,P<0.01).在治疗的第1个月末,8例无效,6例部分缓解;在治疗的第2个月末,3例无效,11例部分缓解;在治疗的第4个月末,2例无效,9例部分缓解,3例完全缓解;在研究6个月时,2例无效,5例完全缓解,7例部分缓解,共12例有效,有效率达86%.他克莫司的起效时间平均(1.7±0.9)个月,其中6例患者1个月内有效,5例患者2个月内有效,1例患者4个月内有效.12例有效患者他克莫司的平均剂量为0.03~0.06 mg/kg,所有他克莫司有效患者的药物浓度均低于3 ng/ml,完全缓解、部分缓解和无效的他克莫司的平均血药浓度分别为(1.6±0.4),(2.0±0.6)和(2.2±1.1)ng/ml,他克莫司的疗效和血药浓度之间无相关性.14例患者仅有1例出现新发高血压,1例出现脱发,观察期间未出现其他不良反应.结论 他克莫司联合糖皮质激素治疗环磷酰胺无效的狼疮肾炎有效,6个月有效率达86%,是一种快速有效的缓解狼疮肾炎的治疗方法,血药浓度3n/ml以下即可有效,其治疗狼疮肾炎的最佳剂量可能为0.03~0.06 mg·kg-1·d-1. 相似文献
17.
Samia Salah-El-Din Mahmoud Doaa Ghaith Yomna Farag Bishoy Ibrahim 《The Egyptian Rheumatologist》2018,40(4):273-276
Introduction
Ferritin is an acute-phase reactant that is elevated in several autoimmune disorders. Serum ferritin levels have been correlated with disease activity scores of juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus (JSLE). Furthermore, enhanced levels of ferritin have also been described in lupus nephritis (LN).Aim of the work
To evaluate serum ferritin as a cheap and available marker of disease activity and renal involvement in Egyptian children with JSLE.Patients and methods
Forty-eight JSLE cases recruited from the Pediatric Rheumatology Clinic in Cairo University Specialized Children’s Hospital and 43 matched healthy children were enrolled in the study. SLE disease activity score-2000 (SLEDAI-2K) and renal activity score were assessed. Serum levels of ferritin, was quantified by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.Results
The mean age of the patients was 12.6?±?3.02?years and disease duration 3.4?±?2.5?years. Serum ferritin significantly higher in patients (416.1?±?1022.9?ng/ml) compared with control (36.1?±?18.2?ng/ml) (p?<?0.001). Serum ferritin was significantly higher in active (n?=?20) (890.4?±?1474.8?ng/ml) compared to inactive (n?=?28) (77.4?±?74.1?ng/ml) patients (p?<?0.001). A significant correlation was found between serum ferritin with SLEDAI-2K (r?=?0.35, p?=?0.014), renal-SLEDAI-2K (r?=?0.49, p?<?0.001) and with renal activity score (r?=?0.38, p?=?0.008). A significant correlation was found between serum ferritin and anti-double stranded-DNA (r?=?0.44, p?=?0.002) and complement 3 (r?=??0.42, p?=?0.003).Conclusion
Serum ferritin level can be considered a reliable biomarker for monitoring disease and renal activity in children with JSLE and LN. This may lead to improvement of management and consequently prognosis of JSLE patients as serum ferritin is an available and relatively cheap marker. 相似文献18.
Jennifer K. King MD Rheumatology Fellow Bevra H. Hahn MD Chief of Division of Rheumatology Professor of Medicine 《Best Practice & Research: Clinical Rheumatology》2007,21(6):971
In the past decade, advances in the area of lupus have led to a significant expansion in our armamentarium of therapeutics, although none is yet approved by the FDA for use in SLE. The use of mycophenolate mofetil has been a substantial advance. Recent clinical trials have shed light on optimizing usages and alternatives of more traditional therapies, such as antimalarials, cyclophosphamide, azathioprine, and mycophenolate mofetil. In addition, targeting components of the immune system has yielded promising new therapies in the arena of biologics, anticytokine therapy, and stem-cell transplantation, which are currently being tested. As data from ongoing trials evolve, our questions involving appropriate patient selection and disease indications will help bridge the gaps in our knowledge and understanding of administration of such potential therapies. Future innovative strategies might include further exploration of: (1) the body's inherent tolerance mechanisms, such as promoting T regulatory cells that help suppress self reactive immune cells; (2) targeting interferon pathways known to be dysregulated in patients with SLE; and (3) exploring interactions between the innate and adaptive immune system, such as studying toll-like receptors and dendritic cell activation.
- • A greater understanding of immunopathogenesis has led to the development of biologics targeting individual components of the immune repertoire.
- • Future studies are warranted for further investigation of the utility of biologics and promise of stem-cell transplantation in patients with SLE.
References
1 Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Guidance for Industry on Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Developing Drugs for Treatment. From http://wwwfdagov/ohrms/dockets/dockets/05d0106/05d0106htm.
2 J. Karsh, R.P. Kimberly and N.I. Stahl et al., Comparative effects of aspirin and ibuprofen in the management of systemic lupus erythematosus, Arthritis & Rheumatism 23 (12) (1980 Dec), pp. 1401–1404.
3 D.J. Wallace, A.L. Metzger and J.R. Klinenberg, NSAID usage patterns by rheumatologists in the treatment of SLE, The Journal of Rheumatology 16 (4) (1989 Apr), pp. 557–560.
4 Z.K. Ballas and S.T. Donta, Sulindac-induced aseptic meningitis, Archives of Internal Medicine 142 (1) (1982 Jan), pp. 165–166.
5 G.B. Ruppert and W.F. Barth, Tolmetin-induced aseptic meningitis, Journal of American Medical Association 245 (1) (1981 Jan 2), pp. 67–68.
6 B.B. Weksler and A.M. Lehany, Naproxen-induced recurrent aseptic meningitis, DICP 25 (11) (1991 Nov), pp. 1183–1184.
7 J.H. Brezin, S.M. Katz, A.B. Schwartz and J.L. Chinitz, Reversible renal failure and nephrotic syndrome associated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, The New England Journal of Medicine 301 (23) (1979 Dec 6), pp. 1271–1273.
8 Y. Shoenfeld, E. Livni, M. Shaklai and J. Pinkhas, Sensitization to ibuprofen in systemic lupus erythematosus, Journal of American Medical Association 244 (6) (1980 Aug 8), pp. 547–548.
9 C. Bombardier, L. Laine and A. Reicin et al., Comparison of upper gastrointestinal toxicity of rofecoxib and naproxen in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. VIGOR Study Group, The New England Journal of Medicine 343 (21) (2000 Nov 23), pp. 1520–1528.
10 D. Mukherjee, S.E. Nissen and E.J. Topol, Risk of cardiovascular events associated with selective COX-2 inhibitors, Journal of American Medical Association 286 (8) (2001 Aug 22-29), pp. 954–959.
*11 B.J. Fessler, G.S. Alarcon and G. McGwin Jr. et al., Systemic lupus erythematosus in three ethnic groups: XVI. Association of hydroxychloroquine use with reduced risk of damage accrual, Arthritis & Rheumatism 52 (5) (2005 May), pp. 1473–1480.
12 H.N. Hodis, F.P. Quismorio Jr., E. Wickham and D.H. Blankenhorn, The lipid, lipoprotein, and apolipoprotein effects of hydroxychloroquine in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus, The Journal of Rheumatology 20 (4) (1993 Apr), pp. 661–665.
13 M. Petri, C. Lakatta, L. Magder and D. Goldman, Effect of prednisone and hydroxychloroquine on coronary artery disease risk factors in systemic lupus erythematosus: a longitudinal data analysis, American Journal of Medicine 96 (3) (1994 Mar), pp. 254–259.
14 D.J. Wallace, A.L. Metzger and V.J. Stecher et al., Cholesterol-lowering effect of hydroxychloroquine in patients with rheumatic disease: reversal of deleterious effects of steroids on lipids, American Journal of Medicine 89 (3) (1990 Sep), pp. 322–326.
15 M.H. Edwards, S. Pierangeli and X. Liu et al., Hydroxychloroquine reverses thrombogenic properties of antiphospholipid antibodies in mice, Circulation 96 (12) (1997 Dec 16), pp. 4380–4384.
16 V. Jancinova, R. Nosal and M. Petrikova, On the inhibitory effect of chloroquine on blood platelet aggregation, Thrombosis Research 74 (5) (1994 Jun 1), pp. 495–504.
*17 N. Costedoat-Chalumeau, Z. Amoura and J.S. Hulot et al., Very low blood hydroxychloroquine concentration as an objective marker of poor adherence to treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus, Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 66 (6) (2007 Jun), pp. 821–824.
18 H.N. Bernstein, Ophthalmologic considerations and testing in patients receiving long-term antimalarial therapy, American Journal of Medicine 75 (1A) (1983 Jul 18), pp. 25–34.
19 M. Easterbrook, Dosage of hydroxychloroquine should be based on ideal body weight: comment on the letter by Alarcon, Arthritis & Rheumatism 48 (3) (2003 Mar), pp. 863–864 author reply 4.
20 R. Feldmann, D. Salomon and J.H. Saurat, The association of the two antimalarials chloroquine and quinacrine for treatment-resistant chronic and subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus, Dermatology 189 (4) (1994), pp. 425–427. View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (43)
21 D.J. Wallace, Antimalarial Therapies. In: D.J.H. Wallace and BH, Editors, Dubois' Lupus Erythematosus (7th edn), Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA (2007), pp. 1152–1174.
22 R.G. Lahita, H.L. Bradlow and E. Ginzler et al., Low plasma androgens in women with systemic lupus erythematosus, Arthritis & Rheumatism 30 (3) (1987 Mar), pp. 241–248.
23 R.H. Straub, M. Zeuner and E. Antoniou et al., Dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate is positively correlated with soluble interleukin 2 receptor and soluble intercellular adhesion molecule in systemic lupus erythematosus, The Journal of Rheumatology 23 (5) (1996 May), pp. 856–861.
24 N. Suzuki, T. Suzuki and T. Sakane, Hormones and lupus: defective dehydroepiandrosterone activity induces impaired interleukin-2 activity of T lymphocytes in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus, Annales de médecine interne 147 (4) (1996), pp. 248–252. View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (23)
25 D. Verthelyi, M. Petri, M. Ylamus and D.M. Klinman, Disassociation of sex hormone levels and cytokine production in SLE patients, Lupus 10 (5) (2001), pp. 352–358. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (17)
26 D.M. Chang, J.L. Lan, H.Y. Lin and S.F. Luo, Dehydroepiandrosterone treatment of women with mild-to-moderate systemic lupus erythematosus: a multicenter randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, Arthritis & Rheumatism 46 (11) (2002 Nov), pp. 2924–2927.
27 R.F. van Vollenhoven, E.G. Engleman and J.L. McGuire, Dehydroepiandrosterone in systemic lupus erythematosus. Results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial, Arthritis & Rheumatism 38 (12) (1995 Dec), pp. 1826–1831.
28 M.A. Petri, R.G. Lahita and R.F. Van Vollenhoven et al., Effects of prasterone on corticosteroid requirements of women with systemic lupus erythematosus: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, Arthritis & Rheumatism 46 (7) (2002 Jul), pp. 1820–1829.
29 R.F. van Vollenhoven, J.L. Park and M.C. Genovese et al., A double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical trial of dehydroepiandrosterone in severe systemic lupus erythematosus, Lupus 8 (3) (1999), pp. 181–187. View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (78)
30 V.E. Pollak and A.K. Dosekun, Evaluation of treatment in lupus nephritis: effects of prednisone, American Journal of kidney diseases 2 (1 supplement. 1) (1982 Jul), pp. 170–177.
31 V.E. Pollak, C.L. Pirani and F.D. Schwartz, The natural history of the renal manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus, The Journal of laboratory and clinical medicine 63 (1964 Apr), pp. 537–550.
32 K.A. Kirou and D.T. Boumpas, Systemic Glucocorticoid Therapy in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Dubois' Lupus Erythematosus. In: D. Wallace and B.H. Hahn, Editors (7th edn), Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA (2007), pp. 1175–1197.
33 H.A. Austin 3rd, J.H. Klippel and J.E. Balow et al., Therapy of lupus nephritis. Controlled trial of prednisone and cytotoxic drugs, The New England Journal of Medicine 314 (10) (1986 Mar 6), pp. 614–619.
34 D.T. Boumpas, H.A. Austin 3rd and E.M. Vaughn et al., Controlled trial of pulse methylprednisolone versus two regimens of pulse cyclophosphamide in severe lupus nephritis, Lancet 340 (8822) (1992 Sep 26), pp. 741–745.
35 M.F. Gourley, H.A. Austin 3rd and D. Scott et al., Methylprednisolone and cyclophosphamide, alone or in combination, in patients with lupus nephritis. A randomized, controlled trial, Annals of Internal Medicine 125 (7) (1996 Oct 1), pp. 549–557.
36 G.G. Illei, H.A. Austin and M. Crane et al., Combination therapy with pulse cyclophosphamide plus pulse methylprednisolone improves long-term renal outcome without adding toxicity in patients with lupus nephritis, Annals of Internal Medicine 135 (4) (2001 Aug 21), pp. 248–257.
*37 F.A. Houssiau, C. Vasconcelos and D. D'Cruz et al., Immunosuppressive therapy in lupus nephritis: the Euro-Lupus Nephritis Trial, a randomized trial of low-dose versus high-dose intravenous cyclophosphamide, Arthritis & Rheumatism 46 (8) (2002 Aug), pp. 2121–2131.
38 S.P. Ballou, M.A. Khan and I. Kushner, Clinical features of systemic lupus erythematosus: differences related to race and age of onset, Arthritis & Rheumatism 25 (1) (1982 Jan), pp. 55–60.
39 A.R. Nissenson and F.K. Port, Outcome of end-stage renal disease in patients with rare causes of renal failure. III. Systemic/vascular disorders, The Quarterly Journal of medicine 74 (273) (1990 Jan), pp. 63–74.
40 M.M. Ward and S. Studenski, Clinical manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus. Identification of racial and socioeconomic influences, Archives of Internal Medicine 150 (4) (1990 Apr), pp. 849–853.
41 M.A. Dooley, S. Hogan, C. Jennette and R. Falk, Cyclophosphamide therapy for lupus nephritis: poor renal survival in black Americans. Glomerular Disease Collaborative Network, Kidney International 51 (4) (1997 Apr), pp. 1188–1195.
42 F.A. Houssiau, C. Vasconcelos and D. D'Cruz et al., Early response to immunosuppressive therapy predicts good renal outcome in lupus nephritis: lessons from long-term followup of patients in the Euro-Lupus Nephritis Trial, Arthritis & Rheumatism 50 (12) (2004 Dec), pp. 3934–3940.
43 T.M. Chan, F.K. Li and C.S. Tang et al., Efficacy of mycophenolate mofetil in patients with diffuse proliferative lupus nephritis. Hong Kong-Guangzhou Nephrology Study Group, The New England Journal of Medicine 343 (16) (2000 Oct 19), pp. 1156–1162.
44 W. Hu, Z. Liu and H. Chen et al., Mycophenolate mofetil vs cyclophosphamide therapy for patients with diffuse proliferative lupus nephritis, Chinese Medical Journal 115 (5) (2002 May), pp. 705–709.
*45 G. Contreras, V. Pardo and B. Leclercq et al., Sequential therapies for proliferative lupus nephritis, The New England Journal of Medicine 350 (10) (2004 Mar 4), pp. 971–980.
*46 E.M. Ginzler, M.A. Dooley and C. Aranow et al., Mycophenolate mofetil or intravenous cyclophosphamide for lupus nephritis, The New England Journal of Medicine 353 (21) (2005 Nov 24), pp. 2219–2228.
*47 T.M. Chan, K.C. Tse and C.S. Tang et al., Long-term study of mycophenolate mofetil as continuous induction and maintenance treatment for diffuse proliferative lupus nephritis, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 16 (4) (2005 Apr), pp. 1076–1084.
*48 C. Grootscholten, I.M. Bajema and S. Florquin et al., Treatment with cyclophosphamide delays the progression of chronic lesions more effectively than does treatment with azathioprine plus methylprednisolone in patients with proliferative lupus nephritis, Arthritis & Rheumatism 56 (3) (2007 Mar), pp. 924–937.
49 T.M. Chan, K.C. Tse and C.S. Tang et al., Long-term outcome of patients with diffuse proliferative lupus nephritis treated with prednisolone and oral cyclophosphamide followed by azathioprine, Lupus 14 (4) (2005), pp. 265–272. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (40)
50 J.J. Cush, KA and C.M. Stein, Rheumatology Diagnosis and Therapeutics (2nd edn), Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA (2005).
51 G.K. Bertsias, J.P. Ioannidis and J. Boletis et al., EULAR recommendations for the management of Systemic Lupus Erytematosus (SLE) Report of a Task Force of the European Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutics (ESCISIT)*, Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases (2007 May 15).
52 L. Barile-Fabris, R. Ariza-Andraca and L. Olguin-Ortega et al., Controlled clinical trial of IV cyclophosphamide versus IV methylprednisolone in severe neurological manifestations in systemic lupus erythematosus, Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 64 (4) (2005 Apr), pp. 620–625.
53 C.C. Mok, C.S. Lau, E.Y. Chan and R.W. Wong, Acute transverse myelopathy in systemic lupus erythematosus: clinical presentation, treatment, and outcome, The Journal of Rheumatology 25 (3) (1998 Mar), pp. 467–473.
54 L. Stojanovich, R. Stojanovich, V. Kostich and E. Dzjolich, Neuropsychiatric lupus favourable response to low dose i.v. cyclophosphamide and prednisolone (pilot study), Lupus 12 (1) (2003), pp. 3–7. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (18)
55 C.M. Neuwelt, S. Lacks and B.R. Kaye et al., Role of intravenous cyclophosphamide in the treatment of severe neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus, American Journal of Medicine 98 (1) (1995 Jan), pp. 32–41.
56 E.J. Lewis, L.G. Hunsicker and S.P. Lan et al., A controlled trial of plasmapheresis therapy in severe lupus nephritis. The Lupus Nephritis Collaborative Study Group, The New England Journal of Medicine 326 (21) (1992 May 21), pp. 1373–1379.
57 H.Q. Zhou, X.M. Leng and F.C. Zhang, [Neuropsychiatric manifestations in systemic lupus erythematosus and the treatment of intrathecal methotrexate plus dexamethasone], Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 86 (11) (2006 Mar 21), pp. 771–774.
58 J.R. Carneiro and E.I. Sato, Double blind, randomized, placebo controlled clinical trial of methotrexate in systemic lupus erythematosus, The Journal of Rheumatology 26 (6) (1999 Jun), pp. 1275–1279.
59 P. Rahman, S. Humphrey-Murto, D.D. Gladman and M.B. Urowitz, Efficacy and tolerability of methotrexate in antimalarial resistant lupus arthritis, The Journal of Rheumatology 25 (2) (1998 Feb), pp. 243–246.
60 W. McCune, W. Marder and M. Riskalla, Immunosuppressive Drug Therapy. In Dubois' Lupus Erythematosus, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA (2007).
61 M. Petri, Arava in Lupus. American College of Rheumatology 65th Annual Scientific Meeting, Arthritis and Rheumatism 44 (2001) S1364.
62 E.I. Sato, Methotrexate therapy in systemic lupus erythematosus, Lupus 10 (3) (2001), pp. 162–164. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (26)
63 S.J. Morton and R.J. Powell, An audit of cyclosporin for systemic lupus erythematosus and related overlap syndromes: limitations of its use, Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 59 (6) (2000 Jun), pp. 487–489.
64 D. Wallace, Additional Therapies Used in the Management of Lupus. Dubois' Lupus Erythematosus. In: D.J. Wallace and B.H. Hahn, Editors (7th edn), Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA (2007).
65 A. Kreuter, T. Gambichler and F. Breuckmann et al., Pimecrolimus 1% cream for cutaneous lupus erythematosus, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 51 (3) (2004 Sep), pp. 407–410.
66 C.E. Lampropoulos, S. Sangle and P. Harrison et al., Topical tacrolimus therapy of resistant cutaneous lesions in lupus erythematosus: a possible alternative, Rheumatology (Oxford) 43 (11) (2004 Nov), pp. 1383–1385.
67 Anonymous. http://www.fda.gov/fdac/departs/2006/206_upd.html#eczema. Journal [serial on the Internet]. Last accessed April 2006. Date.
68 D.J. Wallace, What's new in the management of lupus since 2000?, Journal of Clinical Rheumatology 12 (6) (2006 Dec), pp. 307–313.
69 R.D. Sontheimer and MD, Lupus - Specific Skin Disease (Cutaneous LE). In: D. Wallace and HB, Editors (7th ed.), Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA (2006).
70 M.J. Leandro, J.C. Edwards and G. Cambridge et al., An open study of B lymphocyte depletion in systemic lupus erythematosus, Arthritis & Rheumatism 46 (10) (2002 Oct), pp. 2673–2677.
71 R.J. Looney, J.H. Anolik and D. Campbell et al., B cell depletion as a novel treatment for systemic lupus erythematosus: a phase I/II dose-escalation trial of rituximab, Arthritis & Rheumatism 50 (8) (2004 Aug), pp. 2580–2589.
72 P.P. Sfikakis, J.N. Boletis and G.C. Tsokos, Rituximab anti-B-cell therapy in systemic lupus erythematosus: pointing to the future, Current Opinion In Rheumatology 17 (5) (2005 Sep), pp. 550–557.
73 M.J. Leandro, G. Cambridge and J.C. Edwards et al., B-cell depletion in the treatment of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a longitudinal analysis of 24 patients, Rheumatology (Oxford) 44 (12) (2005 Dec), pp. 1542–1545.
74 K.P. Ng, M.J. Leandro and J.C. Edwards et al., Repeated B cell depletion in treatment of refractory systemic lupus erythematosus, Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 65 (7) (2006 Jul), pp. 942–945.
75 M. Tokunaga, K. Saito and D. Kawabata et al., Efficacy of rituximab (anti-CD20) for refractory systemic lupus erythematosus involving the central nervous system, Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 66 (4) (2007 Apr), pp. 470–475.
76 P.P. Sfikakis, J.N. Boletis and S. Lionaki et al., Remission of proliferative lupus nephritis following B cell depletion therapy is preceded by down-regulation of the T cell costimulatory molecule CD40 ligand: an open-label trial, Arthritis & Rheumatism 52 (2) (2005 Feb), pp. 501–513.
*77 K.P. Ng, G. Cambridge and M.J. Leandro et al., B cell depletion therapy in systemic lupus erythematosus: long-term follow-up and predictors of response, Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 66 (9) (2007 Sep), pp. 1259–1262.
78 J.C. Edwards, L. Szczepanski and J. Szechinski et al., Efficacy of B-cell-targeted therapy with rituximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, The New England Journal of Medicine 350 (25) (2004 Jun 17), pp. 2572–2581.
79 T. Vallerskog, I. Gunnarsson and M. Widhe et al., Treatment with rituximab affects both the cellular and the humoral arm of the immune system in patients with SLE, Clinical Immunology 122 (1) (2007 Jan), pp. 62–74.
*80 Alert F., Rituximab (marketed as Rituxan) Information. 12/18/2006 [updated 12/18/2006; cited]; Available from: http://www.fda.gov/cder/drug/infosheets/hcp/rituximab.pdf.
81 T. Dorner, J. Kaufmann and W.A. Wegener et al., Initial clinical trial of epratuzumab (humanized anti-CD22 antibody) for immunotherapy of systemic lupus erythematosus, Arthritis Research & Therapy 8 (3) (2006), p. R74. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (0)
82 Human Genome Sciences. Available at: http://www.hgsi.com/products/LSB.html, editor.
83 R. Furie, SW and E. Ginzler et al., Safety, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic results of a phase 1 single and double dose-escalation study of lymphostat-B (human monocloncal antibody to BLyS) in SLE patients, Arthritis & Rheumatism 48 (9 supplement) (2003), p. S377.
84 R. Furie, LJ and J.T. Merrill et al., Belimumab (fully human monoclonal antibody to B-lymphocyte stimulator [BLys]) improves or stabilizes SLE activity in a multicenter phase 2 trial, Arthritis and Rheumatism 54 (9 supplement) (2006), p. S28.
85 In: G.J. Silvermann and aKK, Editors, Latest Advances in B-Cell Science (April 20, 2007).
86 W. Stohl, WD and J.T. Merrill et al., Changes in circulating B-cell counts, autoantibody levels and immunoglobulins that associate with therapeutic responsiveness in SLE to BLyS protein antagonism by belimumab, Arthritis & Rheumatism 54 (9 supplement) (2006), p. S780.
87 Dall'Era M CE GM, et al. Trial of atacicept in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Abstract L19. ACR/ARHP Annual Scientific Meeting. November 2006.
88 M.C. Genovese, J.C. Becker and M. Schiff et al., Abatacept for rheumatoid arthritis refractory to tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibition, The New England Journal of Medicine 353 (11) (2005 Sep 15), pp. 1114–1123.
89 R. Westhovens, J.C. Cole and T. Li et al., Improved health-related quality of life for rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with abatacept who have inadequate response to anti-TNF therapy in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre randomized clinical trial, Rheumatology (Oxford) 45 (10) (2006 Oct), pp. 1238–1246.
90 D.I. Daikh and D. Wofsy, Cutting edge: reversal of murine lupus nephritis with CTLA4Ig and cyclophosphamide, Journal of Immunology 166 (5) (2001 Mar 1), pp. 2913–2916.
91 K.C. Kalunian, J.C. Davis Jr. and J.T. Merrill et al., Treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus by inhibition of T cell costimulation with anti-CD154: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, Arthritis & Rheumatism 46 (12) (2002 Dec), pp. 3251–3258.
92 D.T. Boumpas, R. Furie and S. Manzi et al., A short course of BG9588 (anti-CD40 ligand antibody) improves serologic activity and decreases hematuria in patients with proliferative lupus glomerulonephritis, Arthritis & Rheumatism 48 (3) (2003 Mar), pp. 719–727.
93 J.E. Freedman, CD40 ligand–assessing risk instead of damage?, The New England Journal of Medicine 348 (12) (2003 Mar 20), pp. 1163–1165.
94 D. Alarcon-Segovia, J.A. Tumlin and R.A. Furie et al., LJP 394 for the prevention of renal flare in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: results from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, Arthritis & Rheumatism 48 (2) (2003 Feb), pp. 442–454.
95 R.A. Furie, J.M. Cash and M.E. Cronin et al., Treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus with LJP 394, The Journal of Rheumatology 28 (2) (2001 Feb), pp. 257–265.
96 M. Mosca, C. Baldini and S. Bombardieri, LJP-394 (abetimus sodium) in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus, Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy 8 (6) (2007 Apr), pp. 873–879.
97 R. Furie, Abetimus sodium (riquent) for the prevention of nephritic flares in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus, Rheumatic Diseases Clinics of North Americas 32 (1) (2006 Feb), pp. 149–156 x.
98 Teva Pharmaceuticals. Available at: http://www.tevapharm.com/research/products_ai.asp.
99 M. Aringer, W.B. Graninger, G. Steiner and J.S. Smolen, Safety and efficacy of tumor necrosis factor alpha blockade in systemic lupus erythematosus: an open-label study, Arthritis & Rheumatism 50 (10) (2004 Oct), pp. 3161–3169.
100 M. Aringer, G. Steiner and W.B. Graninger et al., Effects of short-term infliximab therapy on autoantibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus, Arthritis & Rheumatism 56 (1) (2007 Jan), pp. 274–279.
101 M. Debandt, O. Vittecoq and V. Descamps et al., Anti-TNF-alpha-induced systemic lupus syndrome, Clinical Rheumatology 22 (1) (2003 Feb), pp. 56–61.
102 E.G. Favalli, L. Sinigaglia, M. Varenna and C. Arnoldi, Drug-induced lupus following treatment with infliximab in rheumatoid arthritis, Lupus 11 (11) (2002), pp. 753–755. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (55)
103 E.C. Baechler, F.M. Batliwalla and G. Karypis et al., Interferon-inducible gene expression signature in peripheral blood cells of patients with severe lupus, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 100 (5) (2003 Mar 4), pp. 2610–2615.
104 X. Feng, H. Wu and J.M. Grossman et al., Association of increased interferon-inducible gene expression with disease activity and lupus nephritis in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus, Arthritis & Rheumatism 54 (9) (2006 Sep), pp. 2951–2962.
105 Y. Braun-Moscovici and D.E. Furst, Stem cell therapy in scleroderma, Current Opinion In Rheumatology 14 (6) (2002 Nov), pp. 711–716.
*106 R.K. Burt, A. Traynor and L. Statkute et al., Nonmyeloablative hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for systemic lupus erythematosus, Journal of American Medical Association 295 (5) (2006 Feb 1), pp. 527–535.
107 D. Jayne, J. Passweg and A. Marmont et al., Autologous stem cell transplantation for systemic lupus erythematosus, Lupus 13 (3) (2004), pp. 168–176. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (24)
108 M. Petri, R.J. Jones and R.A. Brodsky, High-dose cyclophosphamide without stem cell transplantation in systemic lupus erythematosus, Arthritis & Rheumatism 48 (1) (2003 Jan), pp. 166–173.
109 M. Petri, R. Brodsky and R.J. Jones et al., Cyclophosphamide Vs. Monthly (NIH) Cyclophosphaide: Final Results, Arthritis and Rheumatism 54 (9) (2006), p. S444 (abstract 1038).
相似文献
19.
20.
Aim: To compare the pregnancy outcome, in particular gestational age and birth weight in women with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) diagnosed before and after pregnancy, and to review data on presence or absence of the antiphospholipid (aPL) antibody and flares of disease activity. Method: Case histories were reviewed of women with a diagnosis of SLE and an obstetric event attending Monash Medical Centre (MMC) over an eight year period (1988–96). Fifty-four pregnancies in 28 women were studied, with 44 occurring after the diagnosis of SLE (Group 1) and ten prior to the diagnosis of SLE (Group 2). Results: In Group 1 there were 25 live births (63%) with 16 full term and nine premature deliveries, 12 spontaneous abortions, three foetal deaths in utero and four elective terminations. In Group 2 there were seven live births (70%), two spontaneous abortions and one foetal death in utero. The mean gestational age of live births was 35.8 weeks and 39.2 weeks respectively (p<0.001). The mean birth weight of live births was 2448 g and 3030 g respectively (p=0.023). a PL antibodies were positive in eight of 26 women tested with three live births and were negative in 18 of 26 women with 12 live births. Flares of disease activity occurred in 17 of 28 pregnancies. Conclusion: Pregnancy in women with a predisposition to SLE have a high risk of an adverse outcome. Clinical disease confers an additional risk. The mean gestational age and birth weight were significantly less in women with established disease. Mild flares in disease activity resulted in a favourable outcome while renal flares had a worse outcome. 相似文献