Long-Term Results of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Modern Extensively Porous-Coated Femoral Stem

BackgroundThe use of an extensively porous-coated uncemented cobalt-chrome monoblock femoral stem for revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) is well established with excellent mid-term results. The aim of this study is to report the long-term survivorship of these implants in femoral stem revisions.MethodsThis is a long-term retrospective review of prospectively collected data of 55 femoral stem revisions in 55 patients using a contemporary, cementless extensively porous-coated cobalt-chrome monoblock stem. All patients between 2001 and 2006 who underwent first time femoral stem revision with a contemporary, cementless extensively porous-coated cobalt-chrome monoblock stem were included. Harris Hip Score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Index, and University of California Los Angeles activity scores were recorded preoperatively and at latest follow-up. Radiographs were analyzed for evidence of loosening, subsidence, osteolysis, and bony union. This study included 55 patients, comprising of 36 females (66%) and 19 males (34%) with a mean age of 66.4 ± 9.3 years at the time of surgery. The mean time interval from index procedure was 9.8 ± 2.9 years. Mean time from revision THA to final follow-up was 13.2 ± 2.17 years with a minimum of 10 years of follow-up.ResultsIndications for revision included aseptic loosening (33), prosthetic joint infection (13), and periprosthetic fracture (10). Significant improvement in Harris Hip Score (85.1 ± 1.77 vs 51.8 ± 2.3, P < .001), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Index (17.6 ± 0.77 vs 33.3 ± 0.8, P < .001), and University of California Los Angeles (5.25 ± 0.2 vs 2.7 ± 0.36, P < .001) scores were found at latest follow-up compared to preoperative. Fifty-four patients (98%) achieved stable bony ingrowth on radiographic analysis. All 10 patients treated for periprosthetic fractures achieved bony union of their fractures. Two patients suffered intraoperative periprosthetic fractures and were treated with a cable-plating system. There were no mechanical failures and no femoral stem re-revisions. One patient was diagnosed with a deep infection and was treated with chronic suppressive antibiotic therapy due to significant medical comorbidities.ConclusionRevision of the femoral component with a contemporary extensively porous-coated cobalt-chrome femoral stem has excellent functional outcomes, radiographic outcomes, and long-term survivorship with minimal complications.     

Treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures following total hip arthroplasty with femoral component revision

BACKGROUND: Revision total hip arthroplasty is indicated for most periprosthetic fractures that occur around the stem of the femoral implant. The purpose of the present study was to assess the results and complications of revision total hip arthroplasty for the treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures. METHODS: We evaluated 118 hips in 116 patients who underwent revision total hip arthroplasty because of an acute Vancouver type-B periprosthetic femoral fracture. The femoral implant used for the revision was a cemented stem in forty-two hips, a proximally porous-coated uncemented stem in twenty-eight, an extensively porous-coated stem in thirty, and an allograft-prosthesis composite or tumor prosthesis in eighteen. The mean duration of follow-up was 5.4 years. RESULTS: Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that the probability of survival was 90% at five years and 79.2% at ten years with revision or removal of the femoral implant for any reason as the end point. Sixteen femoral components were rerevised: ten were rerevised because of loosening; three, because of loosening in association with a fracture nonunion; two, because of recurrent dislocation; and one, because of a new periprosthetic fracture. Additionally, six femoral implants were resected because of deep infection (five) or prosthetic loosening (one). Radiographs of the ninety-six hips with a surviving implant showed that twenty-one had evidence of loosening of the femoral implant, four had a nonunion of the femoral fracture, and two had both a nonunion and loosening of the femoral implant. CONCLUSIONS: Revision total hip arthroplasty for the treatment of a periprosthetic fracture around the stem of the femoral implant successfully restored function for most patients. The greatest long-term problems were prosthetic loosening and fracture nonunion. Better results were seen when an uncemented, extensively porous-coated stem was used.     

THA revision with extensively porous-coated stems: 32 hips followed 2-6.5 years

Since 1991, we have used 32 extensively porous-coated femoral stems with cylindrical distal cross-section for revision of failed cemented stems. At an average follow-up of 4 years, one stem had been re-revised due to a periprosthetic femoral fracture, but no aseptic loosening has been observed. the average postoperative Harris Hip Score was 84 points. Radiographically, 23 stems were well fixed with bone-ingrowth, which was mostly observed in the distal portion of the porous coating. Increased thickness and density of the thin cortical wall was also seen. Mild stress shielding was present in 4 cases, but was not progressive and gave no symptoms. An extensively porous-coated stem, with a cylindrical distal cross-section, seems to be a reasonable choice in femoral revision.     

Revision Hip Arthroplasty with A Modular Cementless Stem: Mid-Term Follow Up

Despite the increasing volume of revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) being performed in the United States, there are few studies reporting mid-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of modular fully porous-coated femoral stems. We retrospectively studied a consecutive series of patients who underwent revision THA with a modular extensively porous-coated femoral component at a single institution and by a single surgeon. The final study group included 54 hips (52 patients) followed for an average of 84 months. Ten-year survival rates with revision for any reason and revision for femoral loosening as endpoints were 94% and 100%, respectively. No complications regarding the modular junction were encountered. Of the 50 hips with adequate radiographs, all showed proximal ingrowth and 42 (84%) had both proximal and distal ingrowth. The modular, fully porous-coated femoral stem studied demonstrated excellent survivorship and bone ingrowth at mid-term follow up.     

Cementless Modular Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients Younger than Fifty with Femoral Head Osteonecrosis: Minimum Fifteen-Year Follow-Up

This study aimed to report the outcome of total hip arthroplasty (THA) with a modular femoral component in patients younger than fifty years with osteonecrosis of femoral head. Sixty-four osteonecrotic hips in fifty-five patients were available for clinical and radiographic analyses at minimum follow-up of fifteen-years. The mean Harris hip score improved from 36 points preoperatively to 92.7 points at final follow-up. Sixty-two (95.3%) hips demonstrated stable bone ingrowth. No hips showed loosening or required revision for aseptic loosening. Survivorship with an end point of stem revision for any reason was 93.8% and for aseptic loosening was 100% at 16.8 years. We believe that cementless THA with a modular stem is a promising procedure for young and active patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head.     

Revision hip arthroplasty using strut allografts and fully porous-coated stems

At a minimum of 10 years after surgery, we prospectively evaluated the clinical and radiographic outcomes of revision total hip arthroplasties using cortical strut allografts and fully porous-coated cementless revision femoral components in patients with massive femoral bone deficiency. There were 21 men and 33 women (54 hips) in the series, with patients' mean age at the time of index revision being 54.6 years (range, 36 to 65 years). All femurs had 2 or 3 fresh-frozen femoral strut allografts. The Harris hip score improved from a mean of 21 points before revision surgery to a mean of 83 points at the latest case review. Two femoral stems (4%) had aseptic loosening and were revised. All allografts were predictably united to the host femur. On the basis of favorable results at a mean follow-up of 10.5 years, we recommend, as a salvage procedure, the use of fully porous-coated cementless femoral stems and strut allografts in revision surgery of the hip for massive femoral bone loss.     

Good performance of a titanium femoral component in cementless hip arthroplasty in younger patients: 97 arthroplasties followed for 5-11 years

We performed 97 uncemented primary total hip arthroplasties in 80 patients having an average age of 50 years. The femoral implant was a titanium stem with a proximal circumferential plasma spray-coating. Three different acetabular components were used: a threaded and partly porous-coated design in 70% of the cases. The average follow-up period was 8 years. 1 stem was revised 9 years after insertion due to a comminuted fracture of the proximal femur, 1 stem was revised 9 years after insertion due to a deep infection. No stem revisions were due to aseptic loosening. 1 femora had areas of distal osteolysis associated with a deep infection, but no signs of proximal loosening. 3 femora had areas of minor proximal osteolysis. 16 acetabular components (14 threaded) had been revised in 13 patients. The average Harris hip score was 91 points at the latest follow-up. We conclude that the uncemented titanium femoral component with a circumferential porous coating performed well in these patients, most of whom were young. As reported previously, aseptic loosening of threaded acetabular components was common.     

No increased stem subsidence after arthroplasty in young patients with femoral head osteonecrosis: 41 patients followed for 1-9 years

BACKGROUND: Poor bone stock in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head may be a reason for poor outcome after hip replacement. One way of studying bone quality is to measure implant migration. We thus investigated the clinical and radiographic results of cementless THR in younger patients with femoral head osteonecrosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied hips in 41 patients (mean age 48 (25-63) years) with a cementless hip arthroplasty after late stage osteonecrosis. Clinical evaluation was by the Harris hip score, the WOMAC score and the SF-36 score. Stem subsidence was measured with the Ein Bild Roentgen Analyse femoral component analysis (EBRA-FCA) at 3, 12, 24, 60, and 72 months after operation. The average duration of follow-up was 7(1-9) years, with less than 2 years for 2 patients. RESULTS: There was no revision of any hip. No radiographic or clinical stem loosening was seen. After 60 months, the cementless stems showed a median subsidence of -0.7 mm (95% CI: -0.9 to -0.2). No femoral osteolysis occurred. Femoral radiolucent lines, all < 1 mm, were seen in 10 hips. At the latest follow-up the Harris hip score was 83 (23-100) points. INTERPRETATION: Our findings for porous-coated stems in patients with femoral osteonecrosis indicate no greater risk of stem subsidence and rate of osteolysis after an average of 7 years follow-up. Thus, we continue to use uncemented stems in younger patients with femoral osteonecrosis. However, continued follow-up will be necessary to evaluate the long-term outcome.     

Good performance of a titanium femoral component in cementless hip arthroplasty in younger patients97 arthroplasties followed for 5-11 years

We performed 97 uncemented primary total hip arthroplasties in 80 patients having an average age of 50 years. The femoral implant was a titanium stem with a proximal circumferential plasma spray-coating. Three different acetabular components were used: a threaded and partly porous-coated design in 70% of the cases. The average follow-up period was 8 years. 1 stem was revised 9 years after insertion due to a comminuted fracture of the proximal femur, 1 stem was revised 9 years after insertion due to a deep infection. No stem revisions were due to aseptic loosening. 1 femora had areas of distal osteolysis associated with a deep infection, but no signs of proximal loosening. 3 femora had areas of minor proximal osteolysis. 16 acetabular components (14 threaded) had been revised in 13 patients. The average Harris hip score was 91 points at the latest follow-up We conclude that the uncemented titanium femoral component with a circumferential porous coating performed well in these patients, most of whom were young. As reported previously, aseptic loosening of threaded acetabular components was common.     

Good performance of a titanium femoral component in cementless hip arthroplasty in younger patients

We performed 97 uncemented primary total hip arthroplasties in 80 patients having an average age of 50 years. The femoral implant was a titanium stem with a proximal circumferential plasma spray-coating. Three different acetabular components were used: a threaded and partly porous-coated design in 70% of the cases. The average follow-up period was 8 years. 1 stem was revised 9 years after insertion due to a comminuted fracture of the proximal femur, 1 stem was revised 9 years after insertion due to a deep infection. No stem revisions were due to aseptic loosening. 1 femora had areas of distal osteolysis associated with a deep infection, but no signs of proximal loosening. 3 femora had areas of minor proximal osteolysis. 16 acetabular components (14 threaded) had been revised in 13 patients. The average Harris hip score was 91 points at the latest follow-up We conclude that the uncemented titanium femoral component with a circumferential porous coating performed well in these patients, most of whom were young. As reported previously, aseptic loosening of threaded acetabular components was common.     

Wagner Cone Midterm Survivorship and Outcomes

BackgroundTotal hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients with abnormal proximal femoral anatomy requires an individualized treatment approach to prevent complications. Metaphyseal engaging stems in this population risk fracture, size/offset mismatch, and aseptic loosening. The Wagner conical femoral implant is a short diaphyseal engaging femoral stem that could improve treatment success in this difficult patient population.MethodsWe identified 302 consecutive patients undergoing THA using the Wagner cone femoral prosthesis between January 2010 and January 2017. Clinical, radiographic, and patient-reported outcomes were obtained through chart review and radiographic measurements of postoperative X-rays. We used multivariate analysis to determine predictors of poor outcomes. Kaplan-Meier curves were created to demonstrate implant survivorship with reoperation and revision as endpoints. The average follow-up was 3.2 years, with a minimum of 2 years.ResultsThe implant retention survival rate during the 3.2-year study period was 98.7%. The overall reoperation rate was 4.2%, with infection followed by fracture being the most common reasons for reoperation. No patients were revised for aseptic loosening, and no patients were revised for subsidence. The average subsidence was 1.1 mm. The Harris Hip Score improved from 48.6 ± 7.3 (range, 28-64) preoperatively to 86.1 ± 8.5 (range, 66-100) at latest follow-up. The patient-reported satisfaction rate was 98.3%.ConclusionThe Wagner cone femoral prosthesis demonstrated excellent clinical, radiographic, and patient-reported functional outcomes at midterm follow-up. We recommend use of the Wagner cone in THA patients with challenging proximal femoral anatomy, small femoral diameter, or poor metaphyseal bone quality.     

Wagner SL股骨柄治疗陈旧性或伴髋关节炎的股骨粗隆间骨折疗效观察

目的 :探讨Wagner SL股骨柄治疗陈旧性或伴痛性髋关节炎的股骨粗隆间骨折的临床疗效。方法 :自2006年1月至2009年12月对8例陈旧性粗隆间骨折及21例伤前有痛性关节炎的粗隆间骨折使用Wagner SL股骨柄行全髋关节置换并重建粗隆,其中男18例,女11例;年龄43~58岁,平均49岁。术后临床随访,根据Harris评分、肢体长度差异、髋关节活动范围以及髋外展肌力进行评价。影像学随访包括对股骨柄假体周围骨溶解、假体松动、透光线等进行评价。结果:29例患者均成功完成手术,未出现与髋关节置换手术相关的严重并发症。术后均获得随访,时间6~10年,平均8.2年。均无不可接受的大腿疼痛主诉。8例陈旧性粗隆间骨折患者术后首次行走时均有"手术侧肢体过长"抱怨,随时间推移,这种抱怨在明显减少。术后3个月X线片提示21例伤前痛性关节炎的粗隆间骨折愈合,平均术后6个月(3~8个月)X线片提示8例陈旧性粗隆间骨折患者的植骨块与粗隆有明显骨痂连接,末次随访时X线片均未提示假体明显下沉。髋关节活动度基本恢复正常,无髋外展无力。根据Harris评分方法,手术后6年以上对患髋关节进行评价,优18例,良9例,可2例。结论:Wagner SL股骨柄在治疗陈旧性或伴痛性髋关节炎患者粗隆间骨折的初次全髋关节置换中可取得优良的临床疗效,粗隆重建,有利假体和关节稳定,同时增加骨储备。     

No increased stem subsidence after arthroplasty in young patients with femoral head osteonecrosis:41 patients followed for 1–9 years

Background?Poor bone stock in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head may be a reason for poor outcome after hip replacement. One way of studying bone quality is to measure implant migration. We thus investigated the clinical and radiographic results of cementless THR in younger patients with femoral head osteonecrosis.

Patients and methods?We studied hips in 41 patients (mean age 48 (25–63) years) with a cementless hip arthroplasty after late stage osteonecrosis. Clinical evaluation was by the Harris hip score, the WOMAC score and the SF-36 score. Stem subsidence was measured with the Ein Bild Roentgen Analyse femoral component analysis (EBRA-FCA) at 3, 12, 24, 60, and 72 months after operation. The average duration of follow-up was 7(1–9) years, with less than 2 years for 2 patients.

Results?There was no revision of any hip. No radiographic or clinical stem loosening was seen. After 60 months, the cementless stems showed a median subsidence of –0.7?mm (95% CI: –0.9 to –0.2). No femoral osteolysis occurred. Femoral radiolucent lines, all < 1?mm, were seen in 10 hips. At the latest follow-up the Harris hip score was 83 (23–100) points.

Interpretation?Our findings for porous-coated stems in patients with femoral osteonecrosis indicate no greater risk of stem subsidence and rate of osteolysis after an average of 7 years follow-up. Thus, we continue to use uncemented stems in younger patients with femoral osteonecrosis. However, continued follow-up will be necessary to evaluate the long-term outcome.     

Satisfactory Results of the Exeter Revision Femoral Stem Used for Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty

Background

The Exeter cemented femoral stem has demonstrated excellent clinical and radiographic outcomes as well as long-term survivorship free from aseptic loosening. A shorter revision stem (125 mm) with a 44 offset became available for the purpose of cement-in-cement revision situations. In certain cases, this shorter revision stem may be used for various primary total hip arthroplasties (THAs) where the standard length stem would require distally reaming the femoral canal. We sought to report on the early to midterm results of this specific stem when used for primary THA regarding (1) clinical and radiographic outcomes, (2) complications, and (3) survivorship.

Extensively porous-coated stems for femoral revision: reliable choice for stem revision in Paprosky femoral type III defects

Between January 1999 and August 2008, ninety-six femoral revisions were performed with extensively porous-coated stems in Paprosky type III femoral defects (89 type IIIA and 7 type IIIB defects). Seven type IIIB defects with a mean canal of 16.5 mm were observed; 6 defects achieved stable bone ingrowth and 1 achieved stable fibrous condition. Average postoperative Harris Hip Score was 92.3±8 (range, 77-100), and all scores improved postoperatively. At a mean follow-up of 65.7 months, 92 stems achieved bone ingrowth, and 1 stem (type IIIB) achieved a stable fibrous condition. Three patients died from causes unrelated to the surgery during follow-up. The most frequent diagnosis for revision of the femoral component was loosening of the cementless stem (53 patients; 55.2%), followed by status after a Girdlestone procedure (21 patients; 21.8%), after total hip arthroplasty with acetabular wear (10 patients; 10.4%), loosening of the cemented stem (7 patients; 7.3%), and periprosthetic fracture (5 patients; 5.2%). The authors performed 65 total hip arthroplasty revisions, 23 femoral component revisions, and 8 revisions of femoral components with cemented liners in patients with well-fixed acetabular shells. Extensively porous-coated stems in femoral revision for Paprosky type III femoral defects provided good mid-term durability.     

Primary hybrid total hip replacement, performed with insertion of the acetabular component without cement and a precoat femoral component with cement. An average ten-year follow-up study

One hundred and twenty-one primary hybrid total hip replacements were performed in 107 patients. A titanium, porous-coated, hemispherical acetabular component was fixed with screws, and a collared, chromium-cobalt femoral stem, with a roughened surface and a thin layer of methylmethacrylate on the proximal third, was inserted with contemporary cementing techniques (that is, use of a femoral medullary plug, a cement gun, and centrifugation and pressurization of the cement). Fifteen patients (fifteen hips) died before a minimum duration of follow-up of seven years, four patients (four hips) were too ill for a detailed follow-up examination at the time of the study, and two patients (two hips) refused to be evaluated at the time of the latest follow-up. None of these twenty-one hips had had a revision or a reoperation at the time of the latest follow-up. Eighty-six patients (100 hips) were available for clinical follow-up at an average of 120 months (range, eighty-four to 153 months) and for radiographic follow-up at an average of 118 months (range, eighty-four to 153 months). The average age of the patients at the time of the index arthroplasty was sixty-five years (range, forty-five to eighty-seven years). Three acetabular components were revised because of dissociation of the liner in association with a fracture of a locking tine. One well fixed acetabular component was revised because of pelvic osteolysis, and the femoral stem in the same patient was revised because of aseptic loosening. None of the ninety-six remaining acetabular components migrated, was classified as radiographically loose, or was revised because of aseptic loosening. Osteolytic lesions were identified adjacent to five acetabular components, and one of them was treated with bone-grafting around the well fixed acetabular shell. Two hips had a continuous radiolucent line at the interface between the acetabular implant and the bone. Three femoral stems had evidence of radiographic debonding (a radiolucent line that was one millimeter wide or less between the cement and the prosthesis), and they were classified as radiographically loose despite excellent clinical results. Seven hips had osteolytic areas located in the proximal aspect of the most proximal zones of Gruen et al., and five had small osteolytic regions in more distal areas. The Harris hip score for the eighty-two patients (ninety-six hips) who did not have a revision improved from 48 points (range, 22 to 70 points) preoperatively to 92 points (range, 53 to 100 points) at the most recent follow-up examination. Eighty-one patients had no, slight, or mild pain in the hip, and they were satisfied with the clinical result. In the present study, the hybrid total hip replacement with use of the Harris-Galante acetabular component and the Precoat femoral stem continued to provide an excellent result for most patients at an average of approximately ten years after the operation.     

Femoral component revision using an extensively hydroxyapatite-coated stem

Femoral component revisions with extensively coated stems have shown promising clinical results, although concerns over stress shielding still exist. We retrospectively reviewed 59 patients undergoing femoral component revision with an extensively hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated stem. The average length of follow-up was 3.3 years (range, 2-5 years). The average preoperative Harris Hip Score was 43 points, which improved to 86 points at the latest follow-up (P < .01). The overall mechanical failure rate was 2%. No evidence of stress shielding was seen in 78% of patients. The clinical results of this series using an extensively HA-coated stem are similar to those using an extensively porous-coated stem. Long-term follow-up is required to determine if an extensively HA-coated implant will be superior to an extensively porous-coated implant with regard to stress shielding.     

Long-term results of total hip arthroplasty with a cemented custom-designed swan-neck femoral component for congenital dislocation or severe dysplasia: a follow-up note

BACKGROUND: This follow-up study updates the results in a consecutive series of nineteen cemented total hip replacements with a swan-neck femoral component in patients with congenital dislocation or severe hip dysplasia. The series was previously reported on in 1993. METHODS: The patients were petite, with an average height of 152 cm and an average weight of 50 kg, and the femoral canals could not accommodate an off-the-shelf femoral component. Sixteen of the nineteen hips were available for follow-up at an average of 13.3 years (range, eleven to twenty years). Fourteen hips had up-to-date clinical and radiographic examinations. RESULTS: At the time of the latest follow-up, thirteen hips were rated as excellent; two, as good; and one, as a failure because of loosening of both components requiring revision eleven years after the index operation. Another hip required acetabular revision because of loosening fifteen years after the index operation. The rates of femoral and acetabular component revision were 6% and 12.5%, respectively. Radiographic analysis demonstrated that no femoral component was loose. One cup was definitely loose at 19.5 years, and three cups were possibly loose at an average of fourteen years. The radiographic rate of acetabular loosening was 33%. The total rate of cup failure (radiographic loosening and revision) was 43%. CONCLUSIONS: The excellent clinical and radiographic results associated with the swan-neck femoral component, and the 94% rate of survival, at an average of 13.3 years (range, eleven to twenty years) indicate that the biomechanical objectives of this custom-designed prosthesis for patients with congenital dislocation or severe hip dysplasia were met. On the basis of this favorable long-term experience, we still use this prosthesis when the anatomic abnormality cannot be adequately addressed by use of a commercially available prosthetic component.     

The outcome of rerevision of an extensively porous-coated stem with another extensively porous-coated stem

Despite excellent results, failure of osseointegration does occur in femoral revisions performed with extensively porous-coated stems. This study examined the outcome of rerevision of a failed extensively porous-coated femoral stem with yet another extensively porous-coated stem. Between 1980 and 2000, we performed 711 femoral revisions using an extensively porous-coated device. Fifteen patients (16 hips) were known to have undergone a rerevision of this femoral component using another porous-coated stem. At latest follow-up, 2 patients (3 hips) were deceased, leaving 13 patients. At a mean follow-up of 9.8 years, none of the cementless stems had required another revision (100% survivorship), and 12 (92%) of the 13 stems were bone ingrown based on radiographic examination.     

Revision total hip arthroplasty by nonmodular short and long cementless stems

BACKGROUND: The choice of appropriate implant for reconstruction during revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) is controversial. We use proximally porous-coated cementless short stems and fully porous-coated cementless long stems depending on the state of bone loss during revision surgery. METHODS: Between January 2000 and December 2003, a total of 21 cementless femoral revision arthroplasties using cementless stems were performed, and 20 of the cases were followed up for 2-6 years (mean 4.3 years). Proximally porous-coated cementless short stems were used in 5 cases with minimum bone loss, and fully porous-coated cementless long stems were used in 15 cases with metaphyseal bone loss. RESULTS: All stems were radiographically stable at the final follow-up. No osteolysis or loosening was seen. None of the patients needed re-revision femoral surgery. Metaphyseal bone loss dramatically diminished in six of nine patients with bypass fixation of the defect lesion by long stems. Bone remodeling of the lost bone occurred in an additional four cases. The mean preoperative Harris Hip Score was 52.7 points, and at the final follow-up examination it was 79.6 points. CONCLUSIONS: Femoral reconstruction during revision THA by short and long cementless stems depending on the degree of bone loss produced a good outcome. To assess long-term durability, it is necessary to follow these cases carefully.