Resection and local therapy for liver metastases

In 30-50% of patients the liver is a preferred site of distant disease for many malignant tumours. Due to the high incidence, most of the available data relate to metastases arising from colorectal primaries. Surgical resection is at present the only treatment offering potential cure. The achievable 5-year survival rate is 30%. However, only 10-15% of patients with colorectal liver metastases can undergo potentially curative liver resection. Therefore, accurate staging is an important prerequisite in selecting patients who would benefit from surgery. Recurrence of hepatic metastases after potentially curative resection occurs in up to 60% of the cases. Results demonstrate that re-resection of liver metastases can provide long-term survival rates in a carefully selected group of patients without extrahepatic disease. Because of the high rate of recurrences following an apparently curative resection several authors investigated the use of adjuvant chemotherapy (systemic, intraportal, and hepatic arterial infusion). Until recently none had shown effectiveness. Pre-operative chemotherapy seems to be a promising approach in patients with liver metastases initially considered unsuitable for radical surgery. Recently, neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been proposed as an alternative approach to conventional surgery as initial management with the aim of improving the results in resectable liver metastases. Interventional strategies (ethanol injection, cryosurgery, laser-induced thermotherapy, radio-frequency ablation) and combined modalities (surgical/interventional) are additive methods which may help to improve treatment results in the future.     

Intestinal complications after chemotherapy for patients with unresected primary colorectal cancer and synchronous metastases

BACKGROUND: The role of palliative resection of the primary tumour in patients who present with metastatic colorectal cancer is unclear. AIMS: This study compared the incidence of major intestinal complications in such patients who received chemotherapy treatment with or without prior palliative resection of the primary tumour. PATIENTS: The incidence of intestinal obstruction, perforation, fistula formation, and gastrointestinal haemorrhage, and the requirement for abdominal radiotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated at a single institution over a 10 year period was determined. RESULTS: Eighty two patients received initial treatment with chemotherapy without resection of the primary tumour (unresected group) and 280 patients had undergone prior resection (resected group). In the unresected group, the incidence of peritonitis, fistula formation, and intestinal haemorrhage was 2.4% (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.3-8.5%), 3.7% (95% CI 0.8-10.3%), and 3.7% (95% CI 0.8-10.3%), respectively, and was not significantly different from the resected group. Intestinal obstruction affected 13.4% (95% CI 6.9-22.7%) of patients in the unresected group and 13.2% (95% CI 9.2-17.2%) of patients in the resected group. More patients in the unresected group required >/=3 blood transfusions (14.6% v 7.5%; p=0.048) and abdominal radiotherapy (18.3% v 9.6%; p=0.03) than the resected group. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of major intestinal complications in patients with unresected colorectal cancer and synchronous metastases who receive initial treatment with chemotherapy is low. Chemotherapy may be successfully used as initial treatment for such patients with no increased risk of most major intestinal complications compared with patients who have undergone initial resection of the primary tumour.     

Neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy in relation to surgery for colorectal liver metastases

Liver resection is associated with prolonged survival in patients with colorectal liver metastases. At diagnosis, 15-20% of patients have resectable colorectal liver metastases whereas other patients have too advanced disease to enable surgical treatment and receive chemotherapy. In patients undergoing resection of colorectal liver metastases, disease relapse occurs in up to 70%. Therefore, a combined approach including preoperative or postoperative chemotherapy or both has been tested to improve outcome after surgery. In patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases, chemotherapy is initially the sole treatment option. The considerable improvement of the efficacy of anticancer agents has contributed to increase the response rate in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. In case of major response to chemotherapy, surgery with curative intent can be offered to patients with initially unresectable liver metastases.     

Long-term survival of patients downstaged by oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil combination followed by rescue surgery for unresectable colorectal liver metastases

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate long-term survival of patients resected for primarily unresectable colorectal liver metastases downstaged by systemic chemotherapy. METHODS: Among a group of 82 patients with advanced colorectal cancer, 39 had unresectable liver metastases. After treatment with systemic 3-weekly 5FU/folinic acid/oxaliplatin chemotherapy, the outcome of 11 patients made resectable thanks to chemotherapy was compared to that of 28 patients who were not. Criteria for non-resectability consisted of diffuse bilobar invasion with inability to achieve complete resection, unilobar or bilobar invasion plus vascular extension (invasion of inferior vena cava or 2 supra-hepatic veins plus continuity with the 3rd) or involvment of hepatic pedicle. Before and after surgery, CT scan evaluation was performed every 2 months. Progression free survival was defined as the time between starting chemotherapy and recurrence of the disease. We used Kaplan-Meier survival curves and log-rank test for comparisons, P values were two-sided and considered significant if<0.05. RESULTS: Progression free survival times were 14 and 6 months, median overall survival were 60 and 18.5 months, respectively, in favour of secondary resected subjects. CONCLUSION: Considering the magnitude of the survival benefit, one may question the need and feasibility for trials to assess more formally the impact of surgery in that setting.     

Clinical implications of disappearing colorectal liver metastases have changed in the era of hepatocyte-specific MRI and contrast-enhanced intraoperative ultrasonography

Background

Clinical implication of disappearing liver metastases (DLMs) from colorectal cancer after chemotherapy needs to be reviewed in the era of modern imaging studies.

Improvement of surgical margin with a coupled saline-radio-frequency device for multiple colorectal liver metastases

Complete resection of colorectal liver metastases (LM) has been the only curative treatment. However, when LM are multiple and bilobar, only a few patients are candidates for curative surgery. We report on a 53-year-old woman with synchronous multiple and bilobar LM from sigmoidal cancer who became resectable after a multimodal strategy including preoperative systemic chemotherapy and two-step surgery. The spectacular decrease in tumor size after systemic chemotherapy led us to perform two-step surgery, including right portal-vein ligation and left liver metastasectomies, with a coupled saline-radiofrequency device, in order to improve the surgical margin. An extended right hepatectomy was performed later to remove the remaining right liver lesions. The patient was discharged after 28 days without major complication and was recurrence-free 14 months later. We conclude that improving the surgical margin with a coupled saline-radiofrequency device is feasible and effective, avoiding small remnant liver even after multiple tumorectomies. The multimodal strategy, including preoperative chemotherapy, two-step surgery, and tumorectomies, using a coupled saline-radiofrequency device, could increase the number of patients with diffuse bilobar liver metastases who can benefit from liver resection.     

Locoregional therapy for liver metastases from colorectal cancer: the possibilities of intraarterial chemotherapy, and new hepatic-directed modalities

Liver metastasis of colorectal cancer is a life-threatening prognostic factor. Hepatic resection, when possible, is the best therapeutic modality, although the overall survival rate is still low (30%). The diagnosis has been carried out by clinical examination, abnormal alkaline phosphatase, lactic acid dehydrogenase and tumor markers, abdominal liver echography and computed tomography scan. Angiography and intraoperative echography are useful for resection. The number of hepatic metastases and the surgical margin are probably the most significant prognostic factors. Colorectal cancer may spread predominantly to the liver making regional treatment strategies viable options. Subtotal hepatic resections and segmentectomies are potentially curable procedures for single or small numbers of hepatic metastases without other sites of disease. However, there have been no prospective randomized trials comparing patients with unresected liver metastases and resected metastases. Regional chemotherapy with floxuridine seems useful combined with hepatic resection or as palliative therapy. Gastric ulcer and biliary sclerosis are the main related toxicities. Patients with localized, unresectable hepatic metastases or concomitant bad medical condition may be candidates for radiation, percutaneous ethanol injection, cryosurgery, radiofrequency, hypoxic flow-stop perfusions with bioreductive alkylating agents, hepatic arterial ligation, embolization and chemoembolization. These new hepatic-directed modalities of treatment are being investigated and may offer new approaches to providing palliation and prolonging survival. This review reports the possibilities of intraarterial chemotherapy and other novel hepatic directed approaches to the treatment of liver metastases from this common disease.     

General principles of hepatectomy in colorectal liver metastases

Hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases remains the only therapeutic option that improves long-term survival and offers potential cure. By conventional resectability criteria, only a limited number of patients with metastatic disease can be subjected to surgical intervention. In the past decade, better understanding of the natural history of the disease, the introduction of new chemotherapy agents and the advances in surgical techniques have led to more patients being eligible for surgery. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy can reduce the size of the metastases, allowing operation on patients who were previously considered inoperable. Major resections can nowadays be safely performed with the development of new less-invasive techniques and with the use of supplementary tools like ablation techniques. Using portal vein embolization to induce hypertrophy of future liver remnant and combining it with two-staged hepatectomy allow more patients with advanced disease to undergo potentially curative surgery. Careful selection of patients and aggressive surgery in experienced centers improve survival rates.     

General principles of hepatectomy in colorectal liver metastases

Hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases remains the only therapeutic option that improves long-term survival and offers potential cure. By conventional resectability criteria, only a limited number of patients with metastatic disease can be subjected to surgical intervention. In the past decade, better understanding of the natural history of the disease, the introduction of new chemotherapy agents and the advances in surgical techniques have led to more patients being eligible for surgery. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy can reduce the size of the metastases, allowing operation on patients who were previously considered inoperable. Major resections can nowadays be safely performed with the development of new less-invasive techniques and with the use of supplementary tools like ablation techniques. Using portal vein embolization to induce hypertrophy of future liver remnant and combining it with two-staged hepatectomy allow more patients with advanced disease to undergo potentially curative surgery. Careful selection of patients and aggressive surgery in experienced centers improve survival rates.     

Multi-modality treatment of colorectal liver metastases

Liver metastases synchronously or metachronously occur in approximately 50% of colorectal cancer patients. Multimodality comprehensive treatment is the best therapeutic strategy for these patients. However, the optimal pattern of multimodality therapy is still controversial, and it raises several significant concerns. Liver resection is the most important treatment for colorectal liver metastases. The definition of resectability has shifted to focus on the completion of R0 resection and normal liver function maintenance. The role of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy still needs to be clarified. The management of either progression or complete remission during neoadjuvant chemotherapy is challenging. The optimal sequencing of surgery and chemotherapy in synchronous colorectal liver metastases patients is still unclear. Conversional chemotherapy, portal vein embolization, two-stage resection, and tumor ablation are effective approaches to improve resectability for initially unresectable patients. Several technical issues and concerns related to these methods need to be further explored. For patients with definitely unresectable liver disease, the necessity of resecting the primary tumor is still debatable, and evaluating and predicting the efficacy of targeted therapy deserve further investigation. This review discusses different patterns and important concerns of multidisciplinary treatment of colorectal liver metastases.     

Intraperitoneal chemotherapy and cytoreductive surgery for peritoneal metastases coupled with curative treatment of colorectal liver metastases: an updated systematic review

Introduction: We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of delivering intraperitoneal chemotherapy and cytoreductive surgery for peritoneal metastases coupled with curative treatment of colorectal liver metastases.

Areas covered: A comprehensive literature search using PubMed was conducted to screen for eligible records. Studies evaluating colorectal surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy combined with curative treatment of liver metastases were included. We excluded duplicate publications. Sixty-seven full-text papers were assessed and six papers were finally included. The overall survival in the included studies ranged from 6–49 months. Five-year survival ranged from 18%-28%, three-year survival ranged from 22%-42% and two-year survival ranged from 34%-78%. Survival was lower in patients with liver metastases and peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) than those with PC alone in the majority of studies.

Expert commentary: This review poses questions rather than presenting answers. The heterogeneity of survival data suggests the possible benefit of this aggressive treatment approach in selected patients. Standardization of the technique used for intraperitoneal chemotherapy instillation, agent used as well as the systemic chemotherapy and targeted therapy type and duration through prospective controlled trials is required to provide an evidence of a higher strength to support or prohibit this treatment strategy.     

Colorectal carcinoma with potentially resectable metastases: factors associated with the failure of curative schedule

BACKGROUND: The management of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) and synchronous liver metastases (SLM) depends on the primitive tumor, resectability of the metastatic disseminations and the patient's comorbid condition(s). Considering all patients with potentially resectable primary CRC and SLM, curative resection (R0) will be possible in some patients, although in others surgery will never be performed. The purpose of our study was to identify factors of failure of the curative schedule in these patients. METHODS: We reviewed the data of patients with CRC and SLM between January 2002 and March 2007. Two groups were defined: group R0 when complete metastatic and primary tumor resection was finally achieved after one and more surgical stages and group R2 when curative resection was not possible at the end of the schedule. Clinical, pathologic and outcome data were retrospectively analyzed as well as preoperative management of SLM (chemotherapy, radiofrequency, portal vein embolization). RESULTS: Forty-five patients were included. Curative resection (group R0) was performed in 31 patients (69%) with 48% undergoing major hepatic resection. Mortality of hepatic resection was 0% although it was 9% for primitive tumor. Portal vein embolization was performed preoperatively in eight patients and radiofrequency ablation in 13. Median follow-up was 21 months. Overall survival was 86% at one year and 39% at three years. Survival in group 1 was 97 and 57% at one and three years respectively. Disease-free survival was 87 and 40% at one and three years. Tumor recurrence was noted in 61% of resected patients. At multivariate analysis, number of hepatic metastases superior than three and complicated initial presentation of primitive tumor were found to be significant and predictors of failure of hepatic resection. CONCLUSION: Aggressive management with curative resection of SLM may enable long-term survival. More than three SLM and complicated initial presentation of primitive tumor are factors predictive of failure of the curative schedule.     

Hepatic resection for colorectal metastases

PURPOSE: Hepatic resection affords the best hope of survival for patients with colorectal carcinoma metastatic to the liver. However, recurrences are observed in about 60 percent of patients after curative hepatic resection. The purpose of this study was to examine the prognostic factors of patients undergoing curative hepatic resection for colorectal metastases. METHODS: Between April 1984 and September 1997, 168 patients underwent curative hepatic resection for colorectal metastases. The clinicopathologic factors studied for prognostic value were gender, age, primary site, nodal status of primary tumor, time of metastases, preoperative serum level of carcinoembryonic antigen, hepatic tumor size and distribution, number of metastases, type of hepatic resection, resection margin, presence of micrometastases in resected specimen and microscopic fibrous pseudocapsule between the hepatic tumor and surrounding hepatic parenchyma, nodal status of hepatoduodenal ligament, adjuvant regional chemotherapy, and perioperative transfusion. RESULTS: The overall survival was 42 percent at three years and 26 percent at five years, including a 3.5 percent 60-day surgical mortality rate. Thirty-one percent of patients had micrometastases located at a median distance of 3 mm from the metastatic tumor edge. Presence of microscopic fibrous pseudocapsule was observed in 28 percent of patients. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that significant prognostic factors for survival were nodal status of primary tumor, number of metastases, resection margin, microscopic fibrous pseudocapsule, and adjuvant regional chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that 1) hepatic resection is effective in select patients with colorectal metastases; 2) adequate resection margin and adjuvant regional chemotherapy can improve outcome; and 3) microscopic fibrous pseudocapsule may offer additional postoperative information as an independent prognostic factor.Presented at the 11th Biennial Scientific Meeting of the Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver, Perth, Western Australia, February 16 to 20, 1998.     

Improved survival after resection of colorectal liver metastases in patients with unresectable lung metastases

BackgroundModern systemic therapies considerably improve tumour control and thus open the possibility of new surgical approaches in metastatic colorectal cancer. In this retrospective clinical cohort with a comparison group, we investigated whether liver resection in a combined liver–lung-metastasised stage is justified if pulmonary disease is not resected.MethodsFrom 283 patients treated in our institution between 2000 and 2014 for combined colorectal liver- and lung metastases, 35 patients had their pulmonary metastases left in situ while they were eligible for both treatment options: resection versus non-resection of liver metastases. Effectively, 15 of these patients received whereas 20 did not receive a liver resection. In these patients, we compared overall survival and determined risk factors that are associated with poor survival, applying a Cox-Proportional Hazards model.ResultsPatients whose liver metastases were resected showed significantly longer median survival compared to patients who did not undergo hepatic surgery (median 2.6 vs 1.5 years, P = 0.0182). The Cox-Proportional Hazards model revealed hepatic metastasectomy to be the strongest determinant of patient survival (HR 5.27; CI: (1.89, 14.65)).ConclusionOur results suggest that surgical removal of liver metastases may be beneficial in selected patients even if concomitant lung metastases cannot be resected.     

Resectable colorectal liver metastases: pro neoadjuvant therapy - contra neoadjuvant therapy

Approximately one third of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) present with metastases confined to the liver only. In 15 % of these patients the metastases are primarily resectable. After resection of colorectal liver metastases the 5-year survival rate is 25 - 40 %. The EORTC trial of Nordlinger et al. has examined the role of perioperative/neoadjuvant chemotherapy of resectable liver metastases and found in the subgroup of resected patients a significant improvement in disease-free survival through chemotherapy. The results were not significant in the intent-to-treat population. Possible arguments pro neoadjuvant therapy of resectable liver metastases are the early eradication of disseminated tumour cells, the identification of a worse prognosis tumour biology in the individual patient and the higher dose density which can be achieved preoperatively versus postoperatively. Arguments against preoperative chemotherapy are the chemotherapy-induced hepatotoxicity and related increase in perioperative morbidity, the risk of achieving a complete remission of lesions which then cannot be detected intraoperatively and the uncertain optimal duration of chemotherapy. Especially surgical oncologists in Germany do not consider the neoadjuvant treatment of resectable liver metastases as a standard of care. In summary, because of the lack of level 1 evidence, patients with resectable liver metastases of colorectal cancer should be discussed within interdisciplinary tumour boards together with surgeons, gastroenterologists and medical oncologists. Potentially, overall survival data of the EORTC trial which is expected for late 2010 could change the level of evidence.     

Liver resection for colorectal liver metastases in older patients

INTRODUCTION: Seventy-six percentages of patients with a newly diagnosed colorectal carcinoma are between 65 and 85 years old. A substantial proportion will develop liver metastases, for which resection is the only potential curative treatment. This study was conducted to investigate both the feasibility, and short- and long-term outcomes of liver resection for colorectal liver metastases in elderly patients. METHODS: Between August 1990 and April 2007 data were prospectively collected on patients over 70 years of age who underwent a liver resection for colorectal liver metastases in a single centre. RESULTS: One hundred and eighty-one liver resections were performed in 178 consecutive patients (median age 74 years). Thirty-four patients (18.8%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (all FOLFOX) prior to liver surgery and the majority (57.5%) of liver resections involved more than two Couinaud's segments. Median hospital stay was 13 days, 70 (38.5%) patients had postoperative complications, and overall in hospital mortality was 4.9% (9 patients). Overall- and disease-free survival rates at 1, 3 and 5 years were 86.1%, 43.2% and 31.5% and 65.8%, 26% and 16%, respectively. In multivariate analysis: T3 primary staging; major liver resections; more than three liver lesions; and the occurrence of postoperative complications were associated with inferior overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: Liver resection for colorectal liver metastases in elderly patients is safe and may offer long-time survival to a substantial percentage of patients. We strongly recommend considering senior patients for surgical treatment whenever possible.     

The role of surgery in the treatment of liver metastases for colorectal cancer patients.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Liver metastases deriving from colorectal cancer can be treated with curative intention in a select number of patients. Controversy does, however, persist pertaining to the impact of adjuvant treatment strategies. The aim of this study is to elucidate upon the various treatment modalities for patients suffering from liver metastases of colorectal primary tumor as well as to provide a rationale for surgical and adjuvant treatment. METHODOLOGY: From November 1987 to September 1998, a total of 449 consecutive patients suffering from liver metastases deriving from a colorectal cancer were documented at our institution in a prolective study. Prognostic factors providing the most beneficial outcome (whether with surgical and/or adjuvant treatment modalities) were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Whenever possible, curative (R0) surgical resection of colorectal liver metastases provides the most benefit to the patient. Multivariate analysis revealed tumor infiltration of the lymph nodes of the hepatoduodenal ligament and metachronous occurrence of liver metastases as most independent factors related to survival. CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant post-operative chemotherapy fails to significantly improve survival following resection of liver metastases when compared to the liver resection only group. In patients with unresectable metastases, regional arterial chemotherapy did not improve survival significantly when compared with systemic chemotherapy.     

A prospective evaluation of hepatic resection for colorectal carcinoma metastases to the liver: Follow-up report

Single institution studies of hepatic resection have implied that some subsets of patients with metastases from colon and rectum adenocarcinoma can be cured by surgery. However, it is unknown how such patients can be selected and what, in fact, the ultimate cure rate is. The objective of this multi-institutional study was to define in a prospective manner how many patients predicted to have resectable liver metastases actually could undergo curative resection and what the disease-free and overall survival were. A prospective 15-institution treatment plan included all patients who were predicted to have resectable metastases from colon and rectum cancer primaries. Results were compared among patients who underwent successful resection, patients who underwent resection with pathologically defined inadequate margins, and patients who underwent exploration but were found at surgery not to have resectable liver metastases. Fourteen institutions throughout North America and one in Milan who were members of the Gastrointestinal Tumor Study Group at the inception of this protocol in July of 1984 participated in the study. The patient population consisted of all those with metachronous or synchronous metastases from colon or rectum adenocarcinoma seen during a consecutive 3 1/2 year period with protocol registry at the time liver metastases were predicted to be isolated and resectable. Intervention consisted of the application of standard preoperative screening tests, abdominal exploration, and resection of all patients who had liver-only surgically resectable disease. The main outcome measures were: Accuracy of preoperative staging, acute and chronic operative morbidity, and disease-free, as well as overall, survival among the three treatment groups. The minimum follow up on all surviving patiens after curative resection was 2.2 years, with a median follow up of 3.2 years. Median survival times for patients receiving curative and noncurative resections and for those receiving no resection were estimated to be 35.7, 21.2, and 16.5 months, respectively. No statistically significant difference in the survival distribution of the noncuratively resected or the non-resected patients was observed. The survival distribution of curatively resected patients remains statistically superior to the distribution of noncuratively resected patients and those receiving no resection (P=0.01). These results confirmed that, although liver resection for hepatic metastases from colorectal car cinoma is safe to do and presently constitutes the only standard curative treatment for potentially resectable disease, it ultimately cures few patients.     

Two-stage hepatectomy for multiple bilobular liver metastases from colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To determine an appropriate surgical treatment for patients with multiple liver metastases, we evaluated the efficacy of two-stage hepatectomy in patients with multiple bilobular liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma. METHODOLOGY: Some patients with multiple liver metastases are not candidates for a complete resection by a single hepatectomy, even when downstaged by chemotherapy, after portal embolization. In two-stage hepatectomy, the highest possible number of tumors is resected in a first, noncurative intervention, and the remaining tumors are resected after a period of liver regeneration. Two-stage hepatectomy was performed in 11 patients. RESULTS: Two-stage hepatectomy was feasible in all of the 11 patients. In 3 of them, the first stage was a major resection (more extensive than a lobectomy). This first hepatectomy was uneventful in all patients. The second hepatectomy was also uneventful in nine patients, but in one of the other two, a perihepatic fluid infection occurred, and in the other, postoperative liver failure developed due to a right subphrenic abscess. However, all patients were discharged. The percentage of the expected resection volume at one time, calculated from CT volumetry, was 75.5+/-1.2% and the prognostic score as surgical risk was 56.6+/-4.5. In two-stage hepatectomy cases, the percentage of the resected volume and the prognostic score in the first hepatectomy were 25.4+/-6.4% and 6.7+/-7.3, and in the second, 45.7+/-4.5% and 28.5+/-5.8. During the follow-up procedures, a residual hepatic recurrence was observed in 6 patients, and pulmonary recurrence in 9. The 1- and 3-year survival rates after the first hepatectomy were 90% and 45%, with median survivals of 18 months from the first hepatectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Two-stage hepatectomy is a surgical modality intended for patients with initial unresectable metastases. However, following such surgery, protective treatment against residual liver recurrence and lung metastasis will be a most important issue.     

结直肠癌肝转移综合治疗进展

虽然手术仍是目前唯一有可能治愈结直肠癌肝转移的手段,但是在结直肠癌肝转移的诊疗方面发展迅速。多学科团队综合治疗和分组治疗逐渐成为诊疗规范。对可切除的结直肠癌肝转移患者,在围手术期也应实施标准化疗,是否加用靶向药物尚无定论。实施转化性化疗时应选择高效化疗方案,并尽量缩短疗程,且一旦转移灶转化为可切除,就应积极安排手术。肝转移灶不可切除的患者,是否切除原发灶也存在争议。在肝转移灶局部治疗方面的新技术发展迅速,可改善患者生存。