Single-dose comparison of formoterol (Oxis) Turbuhaler 6 microg and formoterol Aerolizer 12 microg in moderate to severe asthma: a randomised,crossover study

Formoterol inhaled via Turbuhaler (Oxis) or Aerolizer (Foradil) produces fast and long-lasting bronchodilation in asthmatic patients. While formoterol Turbuhaler provides sustained efficacy for > or =12h at a metered dose of 6 microg (delivered dose 4.5 microg), the recommended metered dose for formoterol Aerolizer is 12 microg (delivered dose unknown). This difference may be attributable to improved lung deposition with the Turbuhaler. This open, randomised, crossover study compared the effects of a single metered dose of formoterol Turbuhaler 6 microg and formoterol Aerolizer 12 microg in 16 patients with stable moderate-to-severe asthma. Pulmonary function, assessed by measuring specific airway conductance (sGaw), was determined at intervals of < or =8h post-inhalation of each drug on separate study days. Both inhalers increased sGaw at all time points. There were no significant differences between the two formulations in onset of activity, maximum effect, duration of effect or area under the response curve. Furthermore, both treatments were well tolerated with no differences in adverse events, blood pressure or heart rate; thus the formoterol Turbuhaler may, therefore, have an improved therapeutic index. This pilot study indicates that the same clinical effect can be achieved with half the metered dose (6 microg) of formoterol Turbuhaler compared with formoterol Aerolizer (12 microg).     

Evaluation of different inhaled combination therapies (EDICT): a randomised,double-blind comparison of Seretide (50/250 microg bd Diskus vs. formoterol (12 microg bd) and budesonide (800 microg bd) given concurrently (both via Turbuhaler) in patients with moderate-to-severe asthma

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy safety and cost of Seretide (salmeterol/fluticasone propionate (Salm/FP), 50/250 microg bd) via Diskus with formoterol (Form; 12 microg bd) and budesonide (Bud; 800 microg bd) given concurrently (Form+Bud) via Turbuhaler in patients with moderate-to-severe asthma who were uncontrolled on existing corticosteroid therapy. The study used a randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group design, consisting of a 2-week run-in period on current corticosteroid therapy (1000-1600 microg/day of BDP or equivalent) and a 12-week treatment period. Symptomatic patients (n = 428) with FEV1 of 50-85% predicted and increased symptom scores or reliever use during run-in were randomly allocated to receive either Salm/FP (50/250 microg bd) via a single Diskus inhaleror Form+Bud (12+800 microg bd) via separate Turbuhalers. Clinic, diary card and asthma-related health-care resource utilisation data were collected. Improvement in mean morning peak expiratory flow (PEFam was similar in the Salm/FP and Form+Bud groups. Both PEFam and mean evening PEF (PEFpm) increased by a clinically significant amount (>20 L/min) from baseline in both treatment groups. The mean rate of exacerbations (mild, moderate or severe) was significantly lower in the Salm/FP group (0.472) compared with the Form+Bud group (0.735) (ratio = 0.64; P < 0.001), despite the three-fold lower microgram inhaled corticosteroid dose in the Salm/FP group. Patients in the Salm/FP group also experienced significantly fewer nocturnal symptoms, with a higher median percentage of symptom-free nights (P = 0.04), nights with a symptom score <2 (P = 0.03), and nights with no awakenings (P = 0.02). Total asthma-related health-care costs were significantly lower in the Salm/FP group than the Form+Bud group (P<0.05). Both treatments were well tolerated, with a similar low incidence of adverse events. This study showed that in symptomatic patients with moderate-to-severe asthma, Salm/FP (50/250 microg bd), administered in a single convenient device (Diskus), was at least as effective as an approximately three-fold higher microgram corticosteroid dose of Bud (800 microg bd) given concurrently with Form (12 microg bd) in terms of improvement in PEFam, and superior at reducing exacerbations and nights with symptoms or night-time awakenings. Salm/FP was also the less costly treatment due primarily to lower hospitalisation and drug costs.     

Oxis (formoterol given by Turbuhaler) showed as rapid an onset of action as salbutamol given by a pMDI

Thirty-six adult patients (16 women) with mild to moderate asthma with a mean baseline forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1) of 73.8% (46-106%) of predicted normal value and mean reversibility of 24.2% (14.6-47.1%) were included in this double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, placebo-controlled and cross-over study. The patients inhaled single doses 4.5 or 9 microg of formoterol (Oxis) via Turbuhaler salbutamol (Ventolin) 100 or 200 microg from a pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI) or placebo at five randomized visits. Efficacy was measured by FEV1 pre-dose and then 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 min after inhalation of the study drug. The primary variable of efficacy was the FEV1-value 3 min after dose intake. No statistically significant differences were found between active treatments. All active treatments gave a higher bronchodilating effect at 3 min than placebo: 10.0, 11.4% for salbutamol 100 and 200 microg and 11.7, 11.8% for formoterol 4.5 and 9 microg (P<0.001 in all cases). There was a correlation between the measured response at 3 min and the subjective experience of the patients. The relative difference vs. placebo remained throughout the study period for all active treatments except for low dose salbutamol. All treatments were well tolerated. In conclusion, formoterol Turbuhaler has as rapid an onset of action as salbutamol pMDI when given at recommended doses.     

Formoterol (OXIS) Turbuhaler as a rescue therapy compared with salbutamol pMDI plus spacer in patients with acute severe asthma

Formoterol has a similar onset of effect to salbutamol but a prolonged duration of action. However, the relative efficacy of the two drugs in acute severe asthma is not known. This double-blind, double-dummy study compared the safety and efficacy of the maximum recommended daily dose of formoterol and a predicted equivalent dose of salbutamol in 88 patients presenting to the emergency department with acute severe asthma. Patients were randomized to formoterol 54 microg via Turbuhaler or salbutamol 2400 microg via pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI) plus spacer in three equal doses over 1 h. Following the full dose, mean FEV1 at 75 min increased by 37% for formoterol and 28% for salbutamol (P = 0.18). The maximum increase in FEV1 over 4 h was significantly greater with formoterol compared with salbutamol (51% vs. 36%, respectively P < 0.05) and formoterol was as effective as salbutamol at improving symptoms and wellbeing. Both treatments were well tolerated. Formoterol caused a greater decrease in serum potassium (difference -0.2 mmol/l). In severe acute asthma, bronchodilator therapy with high-dose (54 microg) formoterol Turbuhaler provided equally rapid improvements in lung function of greater magnitude over 4 h than high-dose (2400 microg) salbutamol pMDI plus spacer.     

Rapid onset of bronchodilation in COPD: a placebo-controlled study comparing formoterol (Foradil Aerolizer) with salbutamol (Ventodisk)

Formoterol fumarate is a beta2-agonist bronchodilator that combines a fast onset of action with a long duration of action. Its fast onset of action is well documented in asthma but has not been directly compared with that of salbutamol in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted to assess the bronchodilatory effects over the first 3 h after inhalation of single doses of formoterol 24 microg delivered via the Aerolizer dry powder inhaler device (double-blind), or salbutamol 400 microg delivered by a Diskhaler dry powder inhaler (single-blind) in patients with COPD. A total of 24 patients with COPD were randomized [mean age 61.6 +/- 7.8 years, mean forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1) 1.38 +/- 0.32 l and 45.8 +/- 9.6% of predicted]. Inhalation of formoterol or salbutamol resulted in similar increases in FEV from 0 to 3 h post-dose. Both drugs produced similar bronchodilation by 5 min, which became almost maximal by 30 min. The primary efficacy variable, the area under the curve (AUC) of the FEV increase above predose baseline from 0 to 30 min (AUC(0-30 min)), demonstrated significant effects for formoterol (mean 5.89 +/- 4.67 l min(-1)), and salbutamol (mean 6.06 +/- 4.34 l min(-1)), which were not statistically different from each other but statistically significantly higher (P<0.0001) than that observed with placebo (-0.32 +/- 2.59 l min(-1)). In addition, both formoterol and salbutamol produced similar and rapid increases in forced vital capacity (FVC). In summary, this study confirms the rapid onset of action of formoterol and indicates that the onset of action of formoterol and salbutamol are similar in patients with COPD.     

A comparison between the effects of low (1 microg) and standard dose (250 microg) acth stimulation tests on adrenal cortex functions with leprosy patients

Leprosy is a chronic granulomatous disease that either remains localized or widespread depending on the immunological status of the affected patient. It can lead to clinical or subclinical adrenal failure by influencing adrenal steroidogenesis. In the present study, 26 patients (21 males and 5 females) who were diagnosed with lepromatous leprosy and 15 healthy individuals who were compatible with the patients in terms of age and sex were subjected to an adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH) stimulation test. The leprosy and control groups were subjected to 1microg low dose (LDT) and 250 microg intravenous standard dose (SDT) ACTH stimulation tests after 12-hour nocturnal fasting with an interval of three days. Cortisol responses in 0, 30, and 60 minutes were examined. There was no difference between leprosy and control groups in terms of mean baseline cortisol values. Mean value of the peak cortisol response to both LDT and SDT was found to be significantly lower in the leprosy group than in the control group (p < 0.001 and p < 0.01, respectively). Peak cortisol response to LDT in the leprosy group was found below 20 microg/dL in 9 patients (34.6%). As for the peak cortisol response to SDT, it was lower than 20 microg/dL, in 5 patients (19.23%). It was found that LDT response was abnormally low in 4 patients (15.38%) who responded normally to SDT. It was observed that there could be a decrease in adrenocortical reserve capacity although baseline adrenocortical functions were normal in patients with leprosy. It was seen that LDT was more sensitive than SDT in identifying this decrease.     

A comparison between the effects of low dose (1 microg) and standard dose (250 microg) ACTH stimulation tests on adrenal P450c17alpha enzyme activity in women with polycystic ovary syndrome

OBJECTIVE: Numerous studies have found elevated androgen production by the adrenal glands in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). However, the role and the mechanisms responsible for the adrenal androgen excess in women with PCOS are not well understood. DESIGN: Our aim was to compare 17-hydroxyprogesterone (17-OHP), androstenedione, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS) and cortisol responses to a low dose (1 microg) ACTH stimulation test (LDT) with the responses to a standard dose (250 microg) ACTH stimulation test (SDT) in patients with PCOS. METHODS: Fifty women with PCOS (mean age 25.4+/-0.7 years) and 20 healthy women (mean age 27.3+/-2.2 years) were included in the study. The patients and controls underwent ACTH stimulation tests with 1 microg and 250 microg synthetic ACTH in the follicular phase of their cycles. Venous blood was drawn at 0, 30 and 60 min for determination of serum cortisol, 17-OHP, androstenedione and DHEAS levels. RESULTS: In PCOS subjects, peak and area under the curve (AUC) 17-OHP (9.3+/-0.3 nmol/l, 378.4+/-61 nmol/lx60 min), androstenedione (15.6+/-0.6 nmol/l, 806.4+/-52 nmol/lx60 min) and DHEAS (7.5+/-0.4 micromol/l, 385.6+/-25.5 micromol/lx60 min) responses to SDT were significantly higher than the levels in healthy women (respectively 5.7+/-0.3 nmol/l and 249.4+/-52.2 nmol/lx60 min for 17-OHP; 9.1+/-0.3 nmol/l and 413.7+/-31.6 nmol/lx60 min for androstenedione; 4.3+/-0.4 micromol/l and 224.9+/-24.5 micromol/lx60 min for DHEAS) (P<0.05). Peak and AUC cortisol responses to SDT were similar in PCOS and control subjects. Peak and AUC cortisol and 17-OHP responses to LDT in women with PCOS were similar to the values obtained in healthy women. Peak androstenedione (12.5+/-0.6 nmol/l) and peak (6.5+/-0.5 nmol/l) and AUC (336.3+/-22.4 micromol/lx60 min) DHEAS responses to LDT were significantly higher in women with PCOS. CONCLUSIONS: These results show that LDT is capable of revealing the adrenal hyperactivity in women with PCOS. Adrenal P450c17alpha enzyme dysregulation in PCOS is revealed by ACTH stimulation at a pharmacological dose (250 microg) but not by a physiological dose (1 microg). LDT is able to demonstrate adrenal hyperactivity characterized by an increase in DHEAS levels.     

The low dose (1 microg) ACTH stimulation test for assessment of the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis

Traditional testing of the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis function has relied essentially upon the insulin tolerance test or the metyrapone challenge: both tests are not only uncomfortable, but carry also real dangers. The standard ACTH stimulation test uses an extremely hyperphysiological amount (250 microg) of ACTH to evaluate a physiologic response, which may result in false normal responses. The proposed low dose (1 microg) ACTH test is more physiological and more sensitive, especially in cases of mild adrenal insufficiency and allows also to assess pituitary-adrenal suppression after long-term treatment with glucocorticoids. According to the rules of evidence-based medicine, the low dose ACTH test should replace the conventional 250 microg test when evaluating for central adrenal insufficiency.     

A health-related quality-of-life comparison of formoterol (Oxis) Turbuhaler plus budesonide (Pulmicort) Turbuhaler with budesonide Turbuhaler alone and noncorticosteroid treatment in asthma: a randomized clinical study in Russia

BACKGROUND: In Russia, current therapy for the long-term management of asthma is mainly nonsteroidal. This situation provides the opportunity to evaluate new asthma treatments in a patient cohort with little previous exposure to inhaled corticosteroids. OBJECTIVES: To compare the effect of formoterol (Oxis) Turbuhaler plus budesonide (Pulmicort) Turbuhaler with budesonide Turbuhaler alone, on the health-related quality of life (HRQL) of patients with mild to moderate asthma. METHODS: A double-blind, parallel-group, randomized, 12-week study compared formoterol Turbuhaler plus budesonide Turbuhaler and budesonide Turbuhaler alone with an open control group of the investigator's choice of noncorticosteroid therapy. Patients completed the Short Form 36 (SF-36) and the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ). RESULTS: The improvement in HRQL scores for patients treated with noncorticosteroids was significantly less (p < 0.05) than those treated with formoterol plus budesonide and budesonide alone in all domains of the SF-36 and AQLQ with one marginal exception (budesonide versus investigator's choice, SF-36, Mental Component Scale, p = 0.053). Improvements in HRQL scores of formoterol plus budesonide, compared with budesonide alone, although generally higher, were not significantly different. Formoterol plus budesonide was more effective in improving lung function and reducing both symptoms and the need for relief terbutaline inhalation. CONCLUSION: Formoterol Turbuhaler plus budesonide Turbuhaler and budesonide Turbuhaler alone significantly improved the HRQL of patients with mild to moderate asthma compared with noncorticosteroid treatment.     

Comparable bronchodilation with hydrofluoroalkane-134a (HFA) albuterol and chlorofluorocarbons-11/12 (CFC) albuterol in children with asthma.

This was an open-label, parallel group, randomized, age-stratified, multicenter study designed to compare the safety and efficacy of regular use of albuterol formulated in hydrofluoroalkane-134a (HFA albuterol) and albuterol formulated in chlorofluorocarbons-11/12 (CFC albuterol) in children with asthma. Children age 4-11 years using a short-acting inhaled beta2-agonist for 6 months to manage stable asthma, and with a prestudy forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1) of >50% predicted after withholding short-acting inhaled beta2-agonists for at least 6 hr, an increase in FEV1 > or = 12% within 30 min after two puffs of CFC albuterol, and the capability to comply with medication withholding requirements were eligible for study entry. After screening evaluation, patients entered a minimum 7-day run-in period. On study day 1 spirometry and a baseline 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) were performed, pulse and blood pressure were measured, and patients self-administered two puffs of their randomized study drug, either HFA albuterol or CFC albuterol. Serial spirometry was performed over 6 hr after study drug dosing. Pulse and blood pressure were measured just prior to each spirometry and a 12-lead ECG was performed at 60 min postdose. Patients took two puffs of their study drug four times a day for 4 weeks. At study week 4, study day 1 procedures were repeated. Patients maintained a daily diary of morning (A.M.) and evening (P.M.) peak expiratory flow (PEF), daytime asthma symptom scores, nighttime asthma sleep disturbance scores, and study drug use. Demographics and baseline characteristics of the 63 patients randomized to HFA albuterol (33) and CFC albuterol (30) were similar. No significant differences were found between the HFA albuterol and CFC albuterol treatment groups for any of the primary or secondary FEV1 efficacy variables either at study day 1 or study week 4. No significant differences were noted between treatment groups for A.M. and P.M. PEF, individual asthma symptom scores, nighttime asthma sleep disturbance scores, and rescue study drug use over the 4-week study. No significant differences were found between the two treatment groups for change from predose in heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and 12-lead ECG intervals at either study day 1 or study week 4. Adverse event reporting was similar for the two treatment groups. In this study, with regular use of HFA albuterol in children with asthma, there was a similar safety profile and comparable bronchodilator efficacy as with CFC albuterol.     

Formoterol and salmeterol in partially reversible chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A crossover, placebo-controlled comparison of onset and duration of action.

BACKGROUND: In contrast to the well-known activity profile in asthma, the precise efficacy and optimum dose schedules of long-acting beta(2)-agonists in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are not clear. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we aimed to compare the onset and the duration of action of a single inhalation of formoterol and salmeterol in COPD patients having partially reversible airway obstruction. METHODS: In a double-blind, randomized, crossover and placebo-controlled study design, the respiratory functions of 22 patients (mean age 57.3+/-5.4 years) having mild to severe COPD (5 mild, 8 moderate and 9 severe) and partially reversible airway obstruction [mean baseline reversibility of forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) 19.3+/-3.1%] were evaluated after inhalation of 12 microg formoterol and 50 microg salmeterol. RESULTS: Regarding the onset of bronchodilator action, the mean absolute increase of 0.20 liters in FEV(1) 10 min after inhalation of formoterol was significantly higher than baseline and that of placebo (0.04 liters), whereas that of salmeterol (0.11 liters) did not reach statistical significance. At 20 min, both formoterol (0.25 liters) and salmeterol (0.20 liters) produced a significant increase in FEV(1) compared with baseline and with that of placebo (0.04 liters). The peak bronchodilator effects occurring at 60 and 120 min following formoterol (0.39 liters) and salmeterol (0.40 liters) inhalation, respectively, were significantly higher than the corresponding levels of placebo (0.02 and -0.12 liters, respectively). Concerning the duration of action, the 12-hour values of both formoterol (0.25 liters) and salmeterol (0.22 liters) were significantly higher than that of placebo (-0.12 liters). The area under the curve values of FEV(1) of formoterol (3.5+/-1.3 l.h) and salmeterol (3.2+/-1.2 l x h) averaged over 12 h were comparable and higher than placebo values (1.2+/-0.5 l x h). After formoterol inhalation 2 patients experienced tremor and 1 had palpitation; 1 tremor and 1 headache attack were noted after salmeterol. For the pharmacologically predictable side effects, there was no difference between the drugs. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, this study revealed that a single dose of 12 microg formoterol and 50 microg salmeterol provided comparable bronchodilation within 12 h and had tolerable side effects in patients with mild to severe COPD having partially reversible airway obstruction.     

A randomised study of 10 microg/kg/day (single dose) vs 2 x 5 microg/kg/day (split dose) G-CSF as stem cell mobilisation regimen in high-risk breast cancer patients

A randomised trial in breast cancer patients was designed to compare the number of peripheral blood progenitor cells collected after mobilisation with a single dose of 10 microg/kg/day granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) (n=14) or a split dose of 5 microg/kg twice daily (n=14). Both groups were well balanced. No significant differences were observed between groups regarding aphereses parameters. The total number of CD34+ cells collected was higher in the split-dose group (mean of 7.1 and median of 7.4 x 10(6)/kg) than in the single-dose group (5.6 and 5.8 x 10(6)/kg, respectively) (P=0.26). The mean of CD34+ cells collected after the first apheresis procedure was 3.9 x 10(6)/kg for the split dose group and 3.1 x 10(6)/kg for the single-dose group (P=0.24). Circulating CD34+ cells before the first apheresis were higher for the split-dose group (mean 79.7 vs 59.2 x 10(6)/l) (P=0.14). All bone pain scores applied were significantly higher for the split-dose group. Our primary end point of improving the mean of total CD34+ cells collected to 2.5 x 10(6)/kg was not achieved with twice-daily G-CSF administration. Further studies evaluating different mobilisation schedules with G-CSF are needed to determine the optimal regimen.     

Reproducibility of the cortisol response to stimulation with the low dose (1 microg) of ACTH.

OBJECTIVE: Previous studies have shown that the rapid ACTH stimulation test using a low dose of 1 microg is more sensitive than that using 250 microg ACTH for detecting subtle cases of adrenal insufficiency. However, there are controversies for the reproducibility of the 1 microg-test. To evaluate the reproducibility of the 1 microg-test, we assessed both day-to-day and diurnal variations of cortisol responses to 1 microg ACTH injection. In addition, optimum sampling time for the 1 microg-test was also determined. SUBJECTS: AND DESIGN Eight healthy volunteers and five patients with secondary adrenal insufficiency were recruited. Healthy subjects were given 1 microg ACTH 3 times in the morning (0800 h) and 2 times in the afternoon (1600 h). Patients with adrenal insufficiency had 2-tests in the morning and 2 in the afternoon. Serum cortisol levels were measured every 10 minutes for 1 h after the injection. RESULTS: In healthy subjects, basal and peak serum cortisol levels were significantly higher in the morning (P < 0.05), whereas maximum cortisol increments were higher in the afternoon (P < 0.001). In patients with adrenal insufficiency, basal and peak serum cortisol levels in the morning were not different from corresponding values in the afternoon. Intra-individual coefficient of variation (CV) of peak serum cortisol response to 1 microg ACTH ranged from 3.0 to 16.4% in healthy subjects and 10.0-34. 4% in patients. Also, there was a significant correlation between peak morning or afternoon cortisol levels after 1 microg ACTH injection given in different days in both healthy subjects and patients. Twenty-six of the 40 studies in healthy subjects showed peak response at 20 minutes, while nine showed it at 30 minutes Using the data acquired at 20 and 30 minutes, all 40 studies in healthy subjects showed normal results while none of 20 studies in patients was normal. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the cortisol response to 1 microg ACTH stimulation was reproducible in both healthy subjects and patients with secondary adrenal insufficiency. In order to assess adrenal function more accurately with the 1 microg ACTH stimulation test, serum cortisol should be measured before and 20 and 30 minutes after ACTH injection.     

Low dose (1 microg) ACTH test in the evaluation of adrenal dysfunction in pre-clinical Addison's disease

OBJECTIVE: The presence of 21-hydroxylase autoantibodies (21OHAb) is a marker of adrenal autoimmunity and can be used to identify subjects with pre-clinical Addison's disease. The low-dose (1 microg) ACTH test (LDT) is more sensitive than the high-dose (250 microg) test (HDT) for the diagnosis of pituitary adrenal insufficiency, but no information is available on the use of a LDT in subjects with autoimmune adrenalitis and primary adrenal insufficiency. The aim of our study was to evaluate the clinical use of the LDT in the diagnosis of early adrenocortical dysfunction in patients with adrenal autoantibodies. DESIGN AND METHODS: Firstly, we evaluated the cortisol responses to both a LDT and a HDT in a group of 12 healthy volunteers. We then performed a LDT in 11 subjects positive for 21OHAb, but without clinical signs of Addison's disease identified by screening 920 patients with one or more organ-specific autoimmune diseases. In all cases, the LDT was followed by a sequential HDT which was used as a control test of the sensitivity and specificity of the LDT. RESULTS: In healthy subjects, the peak cortisol levels after the LDT were similar to those after the classical HDT. In 21OHAb-positive subjects, the LDT showed a pathological response in five out of 11 (45%) cases and the diagnostic concordance between the results of the LDT and those of the HDT was 100%. All the five cases with pathological LDT were also positive for adrenal cortex autoantibodies (ACA) and 4/5 had high levels of basal ACTH. One subject with pathological LDT developed clinical Addison's disease 4 months after the test had been performed. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that the low dose ACTH test has a high diagnostic sensitivity and specificity for primary adrenal insufficiency and suggests that it can accurately identify subjects with pre-clinical adrenal dysfunction.     

Respimat (a new soft mist inhaler) delivering fenoterol plus ipratropium bromide provides equivalent bronchodilation at half the cumulative dose compared with a conventional metered dose inhaler in asthmatic patients

BACKGROUND: Respimat, a possible alternative to the conventional metered dose inhaler (MDI), is a novel, reusable, propellant-free, multidose soft mist inhaler. Respimat slowly releases a metered dose of active substance as a soft mist with a high proportion of the dose in the fine particle fraction, leading to improved lung deposition following inhalation when compared with the conventional MDI. OBJECTIVES AND METHODS: The equipotent bronchodilating efficacy and safety of a combination of fenoterol hydrobromide and ipratropium bromide (F/I) in cumulative doses delivered by either Respimat or pressurised MDI was assessed in a randomised, controlled, double-blind (within device) 4-way crossover study. Forty-three patients with stable asthma (mean FEV(1) 62% predicted) responsive to F/I inhaled cumulatively 16 puffs on each of 4 test days (1 + 1 + 2 + 4 + 8 puffs at 50-min intervals) via Respimat delivering 50/20, 25/20 or 25/10 microg F/I per puff or via MDI delivering 50/20 microg F/I per puff. RESULTS: Cumulative doses of 400/160 and 400/320 microg F/I via Respimat produced bronchodilation (evaluated by average increase in FEV(1) 45-245 min after first inhalation) equivalent to that achieved with a cumulative 800/320 microg F/I via MDI (mean increase in FEV(1) above baseline 0.76, 0.73 and 0.71 litres, respectively). The tolerability of the F/I combination via Respimat was also comparable to that of twice the dose delivered via MDI. CONCLUSION: Therefore, a fenoterol hydrobromide/ipratropium bromide combination delivered by Respimat is as safe and effective as the MDI at half the cumulative dose, on acute administration to patients with asthma.     

A new multiple dose powder inhaler, (Turbuhaler), compared with a pressurized inhaler in a study of terbutaline in asthmatics

Twelve adult asthmatic patients participated in an open, randomized, cross-over comparison between cumulatively increasing doses of terbutaline sulphate administered via the multiple dose powder inhaler (Turbuhaler) or via a pressurized inhaler. Turbuhaler and the pressurized inhaler showed equipotency both with respect to bronchodilatation and side effects. Both treatments produced a significant increase in pulmonary function measurements, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC). No increase in pulse rate was seen with either treatment but there was an increase in tremor at higher doses with both treatments. Inhalation of beta-agonists via Turbuhaler seems to be an effective way of treating asthma.