Drug-induced adverse reactions via breastfeeding: a descriptive study in the French Pharmacovigilance Database

Purpose

Most drugs are excreted in maternal milk and may therefore be ingested by children during breastfeeding. Data concerning the safety of the use of drugs by breastfeeding women are patchy, and almost nothing is known about this issue for many drugs.

Methods

The aim of this study was to describe the adverse drug reactions of drugs transmitted in breast milk on the basis of the data collected in the French Pharmacovigilance Database. All spontaneous reports of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in breastfed infants recorded in the National Pharmacovigilance Database by the 31 French regional pharmacovigilance centres between 1984 and June 2011 were investigated.

Results

Between January 1985 and June 2011, 276 adverse drug reactions in 174 breastfed children were notified to the French Pharmacovigilance Network. The most frequently reported adverse drug reactions were neurological (28.6 %) and gastrointestinal (20.3 %). Sixty-five of the adverse drug reactions recorded were considered to be serious (37.4 %). The results of our study confirm that certain drugs were frequently implicated in serious adverse drug reactions. Two cases of ADRs (1.1 %) had a ‘certain’ causality score (I4) and 13 (7.5 %) a ‘likely’ score (I3). The suspected drugs include antiepileptic drugs, opiate analgesics and benzodiazepines. These results also demonstrate that some drugs that were thought to be anodyne or for which no data were available, such as ketoprofen and hydroxyzine, may be implicated in adverse effects. Finally, these data show that certain drugs, like pseudoephedrine, which should not be used during breastfeeding, were nevertheless implicated in several of the adverse drug reactions recorded.

Conclusion

This study shows that ADR via breastfeeding are rarely reported due to low awareness or low occurrence of ADR via breast milk. These results highlight the need for additional pharmacokinetic, clinical and epidemiological studies, given the paucity of published data. They also demonstrate the need to improve information for the general public about drugs and self-medication during breastfeeding.     

Paediatric adverse drug reactions reported to the Spanish Pharmacovigilance System from 2004 to 2009

Purpose

This study was conducted to evaluate relevant new information about ADRs reported in the Spanish paediatric population over a 6-year period.

Methods

Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) for individuals aged 0–17?years reported to the Spanish Pharmacovigilance System from 2004 to 2009 were analysed with respect to time, age and sex, category of ADR [System Organ Class (SOC)], seriousness, suspected medicines [level 2 of the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) Classification System] and type of reporter.

Results

In total, 4,279 ADR reports corresponding to 8,196 ADRs were analysed, approximately two ADRs per report. The rate of paediatric ADR reports in 2009 was 165 per million, of which nearly half (46?%) were for children (age group 2–11?years). Similar total numbers of ADRs were reported for boys and girls. The most frequent ADRs reported were from the following SOCs: general disorders and administration site conditions (34?%); skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders (15?%); nervous system disorders (14?%). Reports encompassed medicines from various ATC groups: vaccines and anti-infectives for systemic use (67?%); nervous system (9?%); respiratory system (9?%). On average, 37?% of ADRs were classified as serious. There were 33 fatal ADRs, and 35?% of the paediatric population associated with the ADR notifications required hospitalization or extended hospital stay.

Conclusions

In Spain, ADR reporting rate in the paediatric population has increased since 2004. The proportion of suspected ADR reports related to vaccines was predominant, which highlights the important role played by nurses. ADR notification of congenital malformations in newborn infants highlights the need for joint action between the Spanish System of Pharmacovigilance of Medicines for Human Use (SEFV-H) and paediatricians, obstetricians and gynaecologists. The publication of safety reports by regulatory agencies is determinant for the increased number of ADR notifications.     

Adverse drug reactions in an emergency medical dispatching centre

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to assess the incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADR) leading to call an emergency medical dispatching centre.

Methods

A prospective, observational, monocentric clinical study performed over a 2-year period (2011–2012) in a French prehospital emergency dispatching centre, the Service d'Aide Médicale Urgente (SAMU) covering 1,156,000 inhabitants. All adult patients (age?≥?18) who called for any cause were included. We created an electronic trigger ‘iatrogenic event’ implemented by the dispatching physician for each suspected case of ADR, then we completed the analyses of all the cases with a chief complain represented in more than 1 % of the triggered cases. The primary outcome variable was the occurrence of any possible ADR. We then used the French method of causal relationship assessment.

Results

The SAMU dispatched 339,915 calls during the study. In total, 1,467 ADRs were identified, representing 0.95 % (CI 95 % 0.90–1.00 %) of cases. ADRs were as serious (SADR) in 51.06 % (CI 95 % 48.45–53.67 %) of cases. The major ADR observed was haemorrhage, (42.81 % (CI 95 % 40.62–45.00 %), n?=?628) followed by allergy, hypoglycaemia, vomiting, dizziness and drowsiness. The class of drugs most frequently involved was antithrombotic (43.69 % (CI 95 % 41.45–45.93 %), n?=?641), followed by insulin (17.98 % (CI 95 %:17.06–18.90 %), n?=?264).

Conclusions

Emergency calls concerning ADRs were estimated as 9/1,000, and one out of two is serious.     

Pharmacological prioritisation of signals of disproportionate reporting: proposal of an algorithm and pilot evaluation

Purpose

Data mining in spontaneous reporting databases generates large numbers of signals of disproportionate reporting (SDRs) that need to be prioritised for assessment. The pharmacological relevance of drug–event associations is not considered in SDR prioritisation algorithms. This aimed to propose and test a pharmacological score for SDR prioritisation.

Methods

The Pharmacological Score for SDRs Prioritisation (PS-SP) was developed using a Delphi approach. An expert group agreed that PS-SP should include general criteria concerning SDRs and criteria concerning pharmacological relevance, and that criteria should be weighted for their risk representation. Once defined, the PS-SP was tested for prioritisation of SDRs for extrapyramidal syndrome in the French Pharmacovigilance database; the SDR classification was compared to that obtained using a traditional disproportionality approach.

Results

For a given drug, the general criteria retained were the reporting rate of the adverse drug reaction (ADR) and value of the 95% confidence interval (CI) lower boundary of the Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR). Pharmacological criteria consisted of the ADR reporting rate without concomitant at-risk drugs or those indicated for ADR treatment, and the value of the ROR 95% CI lower boundary as estimated in the subset of reports concerning drugs from the same therapeutic and then pharmacological class. Compared with traditional disproportionality, PS-SP prioritised specific drugs within congeners: metoclopramide, indoramin, and trimetazidine appeared as outliers within their classes; conventional antipsychotics had higher prioritisation than atypical antipsychotics.

Conclusion

The pilot evaluation of PS-SP performed in extrapyramidal syndrome advocates for the use of pharmacological criteria in SDR prioritisation algorithms.     

Underreporting in pharmacovigilance: an intervention for Italian GPs (Emilia–Romagna region)

Purpose

Underreporting is a major limitation of spontaneous reporting systems for suspected adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Several interventions to increase the ADR reporting rate have been proposed, but their efficacy remains poorly investigated.

Methods

This was a questionnaire study aimed at assessing the knowledge, attitudes, and behavior of general practitioners (GPs) regarding ADR reporting and at evaluating whether a monthly e-mail-based newsletter on drug safety could affect the rate and the quality of the ADR reports submitted by these GPs. Three local health authorities (LHAs) of the Emilia–Romagna region were chosen on the basis of their ADR reporting rate during the period preceding the study: Rimini (high), Ferrara (average), and Piacenza (low reporting rate). All GPs (n?=?737) associated with these three LHAs were recruited. The pooled number of ADR reports sent by GPs in the remaining seven LHAs of the region was used as controls. The study covered a period of 3 years and was divided into: (1) identification of the reasons leading to underreporting through a questionnaire (Phase I); (2) the intervention, i.e., sending a newsletter for a 10-month period (Phase II); (3) evaluation of the intervention outcomes during the 10 months following the period in which the newsletter had been received (Phase III).

Results

Among GPs involved, 22.8 % returned the questionnaire. Over 94 % of the respondents considered the spontaneous reporting of suspected ADRs to be part of their professional obligations, but only 6.5 % had submitted at least one report in the previous 6 months. Following the completion of Phase II, the overall number of reports coming from the LHAs subjected to the intervention rose by 49.2 % compared to 2009, while the number of reports coming from the control LHAs increased by 8.8 %. Rimini and Piacenza showed a 200 % increase in the number of ADR reports submitted by GPs, while the number of ADR reported submitted by the control group decreased by 25.5 %. In 2011, the number of overall ADRs reports from the LHAs subjected to the intervention decreased by 6.8 %; this decrease reached 50.0 % of the GPs. Control HLAs showed an overall decline of 4.3 %, while the total number of ADRs from GPs increased by 63.3 %. Ferrara was excluded from the analysis due to confounding factors.

Conclusions

The periodic e-mail update on the safety of drugs represents an effective and inexpensive way to raise the awareness of GPs on the importance of spontaneous ADR reporting. Since the outcome of the intervention seemed to disappear after the intervention was stopped, there appears to be a need to adopt a policy of regular updates and educational strategies for health professionals.     

A comprehensive intervention for adverse drug reactions identification and reporting in a Pediatric Emergency Department

Background Physicians identify from 45.7 to 96.2 % of Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) in their patients, with under-reporting ranging from 6 to 100 %. In order to improve ADR reporting, several interventions have been evaluated in different studies, but not with regard to ADR identification. In addition, it is not known whether some patient characteristics might influence on ADR identification and reporting by physicians. Objectives (a) To assess the effectiveness of a comprehensive intervention directed to Emergency Department physicians and coordinated by a pharmacist in a tertiary care pediatric hospital on ADR identification and reporting. (b) To assess if some of the children’s characteristics might influence on ADR identification and reporting. Setting The Emergency Department of the Hospital Infantil de México “Federico Gómez”, which is a national pediatric institute of health in México. Methods A Quasi-experimental, pre-post test trial was designed. During the intervention, the pharmacist gave talks on Pharmacovigilance and on the program for electronic capture of data, took part in patient visits, left reminders, improved accessibility to ADR report format and performed feedback activities. To classify and quantify correctly identified ADRs and ADRs reported to the Institutional Pharmacovigilance Center (IPC), 1136 clinical records were reviewed. The models were adjusted for patient variables. Main outcome measures Total ADRs, ADRs correctly identified by physicians, ADRs reported to the IPC by physicians. Results Before the intervention, 97 % of ADRs were correctly identified and 6.1 % reported by physicians. During the intervention, 99.6 % were correctly identified and 41.2 % were reported, and after the intervention, 99.6 and 41.7 %, respectively. Identification during the intervention showed a sevenfold increase with regard to preintervention and was maintained post-intervention. ADR reporting during the intervention showed a 14-fold increase with regard to pre-intervention and was maintained during post-intervention. Conclusion Physicians do identify ADRs, but fail to report them. The intervention increased ADR correct identification and reporting. The effect was maintained after the intervention.     

Adverse drug reactions in children: a ten-year review of reporting to the Portuguese Pharmacovigilance System

Objective: Adverse drug reactions (ADR) are a public health problem. They cause significant morbidity, mortality and health costs. Less is known about pediatric ADR. Our goal was to characterize a pediatric case series of ADR reported to the Portuguese Pharmacovigilance System (PPS) during the past 10 years.

Research design and methods: Retrospective analysis of ADR reports concerning patients till 17 years old received by the PPS between 2003 and 2012. We evaluated patients’ demographic data and involved drugs, as well as characteristics and seriousness of reactions, stratified by age groups.

Results: We found 1742 reports (50% females) corresponding to 9.7% of the total received. The age of the patients varied from 0 to 17 years (median: 5 years, interquartile range: 10.6), with 566 cases (32%) occurring in patients younger than 2y. Among the 1195 serious cases, 31% (370) episodes led to hospitalization. In 32 cases (2%) there was a fatal outcome. Most of the ADR reported referred to general disorders and administration site conditions, followed by skin and subcutaneous tissue reactions. Vaccines were the most represented group (42%) followed by antibacterials for systemic use (17%).

Conclusions: Pediatric ADR represents about 10% of the reports received by the PPS. Most ADR were considered serious. Major findings varied according to age groups.     

Drug-induced life-threatening potassium disturbances detected by a pharmacovigilance program from laboratory signals

Purpose

Detection and reporting of drug-induced life-threatening potassium disturbances and the study of associated factors under a Pharmacovigilance Program using Laboratory Signals at a Hospital (PPLSH) during a 2-year period.

Methods

All serum potassium levels <2 mmol/l or >7 mmol/l detected at admission to the hospital, including those of patients who died in the emergency ward or during hospitalization, were monitored prospectively from January 2009 through to December 2010. The incidence rate of each etiology of potassium disturbances was calculated. Factors associated with drug-induced potassium disturbances were detected using a multiple logistic regression model.

Results

The incidence of true life-threatening drug-induced hyper- and hypokalemia events was 3 and 4.32 (Poisson 95 % confidence interval 1.62–10.24), respectively, per 10,000 admissions. Of the severe potassium disturbances, 32.3 % were drug-induced, and 23 % were lethal. We identified previously undescribed pharmacological causes of hyperkalemia (risedronate, doxazosin) and hypokalemia (acyclovir, teicoplanin, cefepime, meropenem, dexketoprofen colistimethate). Significant predictor factors associated with drug-induced hyperkalemia were the use of polypharmacy (>5 drugs), age (>74 years), sex (female) and kidney disease (glomerular filtration rate <60 ml/min) with the presence of ≥4 comorbid conditions. The only predictor of drug-induced hypokalemia was the use of >5 drugs. The triggering factor associated with drug-induced hyperkalemia and hypokalemia was azotemia and hypoalbuminemia, respectively.

Conclusions

Drug-induced life-threatening potassium disturbances remain a relevant problem. Potential strategies for prevention are to avoid polypharmacy, early discontinuation of treatment of drugs causing hyperkalemia or nephrotoxicity in cases of various clinical situations (cardiac descompensation, infection, hypovolemia) or obstructive causes, and insistence on albumin control during hospitalization.     

Psychotropic medication in geriatric psychiatric patients: use and unreported use in relation to serum concentrations

Purpose

The aim of this observational study was to describe the type, number, and serum concentration levels of psychotropic drugs in elderly patients, on admission to a geriatric psychiatric inpatient unit. We further wanted to investigate the use and unreported use of psychotropic drugs by analyzing for a broad spectrum of drugs in the serum samples.

Methods

A total of 236 patients were included. Drug use, patient characteristics, and diagnoses were recorded, and serum analysis was performed for a total of 56 psychotropic drugs in 233 of the patients.

Results

Nine out of ten patients (88 %) used one or more psychotropic drugs on admission to hospital; the mean use was 2.8 (95 % confidence interval (CI) 2.6–2.9) drugs. In 25 patients (11 %), drugs reported used were not detected in serum. Unreported use of drugs (serum analysis revealing one or more drugs not reported) was found in 100 patients (43 %). This was more common in younger patients. Psychotropic polypharmacy (use of three or more psychotropic drugs) was found in 109 patients (47 %). Patients with a main diagnosis of affective disorder used the most psychotropic drugs.

Conclusions

Psychotropic drugs are commonly used among geriatric psychiatric patients on admission to hospital. Psychotropic polypharmacy is a major concern among these patients. There was considerable unreported use of drugs within this population, and a low threshold for a broader serum analysis for psychotropic drugs appears indicated.     

Spontaneous reporting of serious cutaneous reactions with protein kinase inhibitors

Purpose

Our aim was to describe all serious cutaneous adverse drug reactions (ADRs) spontaneously reported in France for all oral protein kinase inhibitors, their characteristics and whether they were labeled (reported in the Summary of Product Characteristics) or not.

Methods

We performed a retrospective observational study in the French PharmacoVigilance Database, selecting for analysis serious cutaneous reactions of patients due to treatment with oral protein kinase inhibitors (erlotinib, gefitinib, imatinib, nilotinib, dasatinib, sunitinib, sorafenib, pazopanib, lapatinib, everolimus) between 1 January 2008 and 31 December 31 2010.

Results

Ninety-four patients suffered from 115 serious cutaneous reactions due to oral protein kinase inhibitors. Serious cutaneous reactions more frequently reported were maculo-papular rash (mostly with imatinib), followed by hand–foot syndrome (specifically with sorafenib) and papulopustular rash (particularly with erlotinib). Patients were mostly males (63 %) with a mean age of 62.6?±?15.4 years. Drug withdrawal was observed in 73.1 % of cases because of these cutaneous reactions. Delay of occurrence of the ADR varied from 11.5 to 58.5 days. Unlabeled serious reactions were found (17.4 %), including skin ulceration, vasculitis or purpura with sorafenib or sunitinib and drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms with imatinib.

Conclusion

Some of the serious ADRs spontaneously reported with oral protein kinase inhibitors are labeled and commonly reported in the literature, but others occur only rarely and unlabeled. In our study, most serious ADRs occurred in males within the 2 first months of treatment and were responsible for the withdrawal of therapy with protein kinase inhibitors.     

Intensive monitoring of duloxetine: results of a web-based intensive monitoring study

Purpose

Duloxetine (Cymbalta^®) is a serotonin (5-HT) and norepinephrine (NE) re-uptake inhibitor indicated for the treatment of depression, diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain and general anxiety disorder. The aim of this study is to gain insight in the user and safety profile of duloxetine in daily practice, reported by patients via a web-based intensive monitoring system during their first 6 months of use.

Methods

First-time users of duloxetine were identified through the first dispensing signal in the pharmacy. Patient demographics and information about drug use and adverse drug reactions, ADRs, were collected through electronic questionnaires sent 2 and 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months after the start of duloxetine administration. ADRs were quantified and signal detection was performed on a case by case basis.

Results

Three hundred and ninety-eight patients registered for the study; 69.1 % were female. Depression was the main indication. Three hundred and three patients (76.1 %) filled in at least one questionnaire and 78.9 % of these reported an ADR. Serious ADRs were reported by 4 patients. Three new signals were identified, amenorrhea, shock-like paraesthesias and micturition problems.

Conclusions

Web-based intensive monitoring is an observational prospective cohort study mirroring the use and ADRs of duloxetine in daily practice. This study indicates that duloxetine is a relatively safe drug as used by patients for six months in daily practice, but the aforementioned signals need to be evaluated in more detail.     

Drug-induced anaphylaxis : case/non-case study based on an italian pharmacovigilance database.

OBJECTIVE: To identify the number of cases of anaphylaxis reported in association with different classes of drugs and compare it with other reports contained in the same database. METHODS: The data were obtained from a database containing all of the spontaneous reports of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) coming from the Italian regions of Emilia Romagna, Lombardy and the Veneto, which are the main contributors to the Italian spontaneous surveillance system. The ADRs reported between January 1990 and December 2003 with a causality assessment of certainly, probably or possibly drug related (according to the WHO criteria) were analysed using a case/non-case design. The cases were defined as the reactions already coded by the WHO preferred terms of 'anaphylactic shock' or 'anaphylactoid reaction' (this last term also included anaphylactic reaction) and those with a time of event onset that suggested an allergic reaction and involved at least two of the skin, respiratory, gastrointestinal, CNS or cardiovascular systems; the non-cases were all of the other ADR reports. The frequency of the association between anaphylaxis and the suspected drug in comparison with the frequency of anaphylaxis associated to all of the other drugs was calculated using the ADR reporting odds ratio (ROR) as a measure of disproportionality. RESULTS: Our database contained 744 cases (including 307 cases of anaphylactic shock with 10 deaths) and 27 512 non-cases. The percentage of anaphylaxis cases reported in inpatients was higher than that among outpatients (59.1% vs 40.9%). This distribution is significantly different from that of the other ADR reports that mainly refer to outpatients. After intravenous drug administrations, anaphylactic shock cases were more frequent than anaphylactoid reactions or other ADRs, but more than one-third of these reactions were caused by an oral drug. Blood substitutes and radiology contrast agents had the highest RORs. Among the systemic antibacterial agents, anaphylaxis was disproportionally reported more often for penicillins, quinolones, cephalosporins and glycopeptides, but diclofenac was the only NSAID with a significant ROR. As a category, vaccines had a significantly lower ROR, thus indicating that anaphylaxis is reported proportionally less than other ADRs. CONCLUSIONS: Anaphylaxis is a severe ADR that may also occur with commonly used drugs. It represents 2.7% of all of the ADRs reported in an Italian spontaneous reporting database.     

Use of rivaroxaban in Germany: a database drug utilization study of a drug started in hospital

Purpose

The purpose of this drug utilization study was to describe the use of rivaroxaban in Germany during a time period in which approval was limited to the prevention of venous thromboembolism following hip or knee replacement. Additionally, we explored the feasibility of reconstructing inpatient drug use of rivaroxaban in a database where with a few exceptions inpatient prescribing information is not available.

Methods

Source of data was one statutory health insurance providing data on about seven million insurants throughout Germany. Analyses were based on a cohort of rivaroxaban users from launch (October 2008) to December 2009 and encompassed potential indications for rivaroxaban use, treatment duration, and co-prescribing of potentially interacting drugs. Start of rivaroxaban treatment was defined by the date of surgery.

Results

During the study period, 425 rivaroxaban users were identified contributing 440 treatment periods. For more than 82 % of these episodes labelled indications could be determined. Treatment durations exceeded recommendations in 95 % of the episodes following knee replacement whereas rivaroxaban use after elective hip surgery was found to be longer than recommended in 56 %. Prescribing of potentially interacting medication was rare except for non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

Conclusions

Overall, no important off-label use of rivaroxaban was identified. Based on several assumptions that have to be considered in the interpretation of the results our study describes a database approach to reconstruct inpatient drug use for a drug started after a coded hospital procedure, when treatment continues after hospital discharge and no change in drug use is expected in the outpatient setting.     

Characterisation of non-warfarin-associated bleeding events reported to the Norwegian spontaneous reporting system

Objective

The aim of the study was to analyse non-warfarin-associated bleeding adverse drug events reported to the Norwegian spontaneous reporting system, with characterisation of the bleeding locations, outcome and drug interactions. In addition, concordance in assessments between reporters and evaluators, trend shifts in reporting, and detection of potentially new adverse drug interaction signals were studied.

Methods

Data on bleeding events reported between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2005 were retrieved from the Norwegian spontaneous reporting system database.

Results

Of 327 case reports of non-warfarin-associated bleeding events, 270 reports (82.6 %) were characterised as serious and 69 (21.1 %) had a fatal outcome. One hundred and eighty-seven bleeds (57.5 %) were gastrointestinal, 57 (17.4 %) were cerebral, and 81 (24.8 %) were from other bleeding sites. The bleeding sites differed with respect to the patient's age, drug use, diagnoses and outcomes. Of drugs associated with bleeding, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)/COX-2 inhibitors (145 reports) and acetylsalicylic acid (128 reports) were most frequently used. Only fibrinolytics were associated with increased mortality. There was a 67.4 % correlation between reporters and evaluators in assessment of drugs associated with bleeding (P?<?0.001), with considerable variation in concordance between drug groups.

Conclusion

Non-warfarin-associated bleeding events are associated with substantial mortality. Old age, cerebral bleeds, number of drugs used, and use of fibrinolytics are all independently associated with increased mortality. The recognition of the bleeding risk of commonly used drugs such as acetylsalicylic acid and heparins may be insufficient among prescribers.     

Use of administrative hospital database to identify adverse drug reactions in a Pediatric University Hospital

Purpose

The aim of the study was to detect adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in pediatric inpatients using the medical administrative database “Programme de Médicalisation des Systèmes d′Information” (PMSI) and to compare these cases ADRs with those spontaneously reported to a regional PharmacoVigilance (PV) Centre.

Methods

The study was conducted from January 2008 to December 2011 in the Children University Hospital of Toulouse (Midi-Pyrénées, South-west France). From PMSI database, all discharge summaries including selected ICD-10 codes (10th International Classification of Diseases) were analyzed. All ADRs spontaneously reported by the Children Hospital of Toulouse and registered in the French PV Database (FPVDB) were included. The capture–recapture method was applied to estimate the incidence of ADRs.

Results

During the study period, we identified 60 reports from the PMSI database and 200 from the FPVDB. The rate of “serious” ADRs was higher in PMSI reports (74.6 % vs 38.9 %, p?Conclusions Use of PMSI database improves from around 30 % detection of ADRs in children. In comparison with classical pharmacovigilance database, it also allows to detect different ADRs and drugs, thus enhancing safe medicine use for pediatric patients.     

Adverse effects from antidepressant treatment: randomised controlled trial of 601 depressed individuals

Rationale

Premature discontinuation of antidepressant drugs is a frequent clinical problem. Adverse effects are common, occur early on in treatment and are reported to be one of the main reasons for discontinuation of antidepressant treatment.

Objectives

To investigate the association between adverse effects occurring in the first 2 weeks of antidepressant treatment and discontinuation by 6 weeks as the outcome. To investigate the time profile of adverse effects induced by the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor citalopram and the noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor reboxetine over 12 weeks of treatment.

Methods

Six hundred and one depressed individuals were randomly allocated to either citalopram (20 mg daily) or reboxetine (4 mg twice daily). A modified version of the Toronto Side Effects Scale was used to measure 14 physical symptoms at baseline (medication free) and at 2, 6 and 12 weeks after randomisation.

Results

Individuals randomised to reboxetine reported a greater number of adverse effects and were more likely to stop treatment than individuals receiving citalopram. Dizziness (OR 1.83; 95% CI 1.09, 3.09; p?=?0.02) and the total number of adverse effects (OR 1.12; 95% CI 1.00, 1.25; p?=?0.06) reported at 2 weeks were associated with discontinuation from overall antidepressant treatment by 6 weeks. Reports of adverse effects tended to reduce throughout the 12 weeks for both antidepressants.

Conclusions

The majority of adverse effects were not individually associated with discontinuation from antidepressant treatment. Reports of physical symptoms tended to reduce over time. The physical symptoms that did not reduce over time may represent symptoms of depression rather than antidepressant-induced adverse effects.     

Identifying high-risk medication: a systematic literature review

Purpose

A medication error (ME) is an error that causes damage or poses a threat of harm to a patient. Several studies have shown that only a minority of MEs actually causes harm, and this might explain why medication reviews at hospital admission reduce the number of MEs without showing an effect on length of hospital stay, readmissions, or death. The purpose of this study was to define drugs that actually cause serious MEs. We conducted a literature search of medication reviews and other preventive efforts.

Methods

A systematic search in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Reviews, Psycinfo, and SweMed+ was performed. Danish databases containing published patient complaints, patient compensation, and reported medication errors were also searched. Articles and case reports were included if they contained information of an ME causing a serious adverse reaction (AR) in a patient. Information concerning AR seriousness, causality, and preventability was required for inclusion.

Results

This systematic literature review revealed that 47 % of all serious MEs were caused by seven drugs or drug classes: methotrexate, warfarin, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS), digoxin, opioids, acetylic salicylic acid, and beta-blockers; 30 drugs or drug classes caused 82 % of all serious MEs. The top ten drugs involved in fatal events accounted for 73 % of all drugs identified.

Conclusion

Increasing focus on seven drugs/drug classes can potentially reduce hospitalizations, extended hospitalizations, disability, life-threatening conditions, and death by almost 50 %.