A randomized phase II trial of gemcitabine plus treosulfan versus treosulfan alone in patients with metastatic uveal melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Several trials demonstrated efficacy of the gemcitabine/treosulfan (GeT) combination in metastatic uveal melamoma. This randomized phase II trial compared the GeT combination versus treosulfan alone (T) in this rare disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Chemotherapy-naive patients with proven metastatic uveal melanoma were randomly assigned to receive 1000 mg/m(2) of gemcitabine plus 3500 mg/m(2) of treosulfan (GeT) or 3500 mg/m(2) of T. Chemotherapy was administered on days 1 and 8 in both arms, cycles were repeated on day 29. Primary end point was rate of responses and disease stabilizations. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients were randomized. Seven confirmed stable diseases (SDs) and one partial remission (PR) were observed in 24 patients treated with the GeT regimen, whereas no PR and only three SDs were observed in the T arm (P = 0.08). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3 months (95% CI 1.1-4.9) and 2 months (95% CI 1.7-2.3) in the GeT and T arm (P = 0.008, log-rank). Six and 12 months PFS was 34.8% and 17.9% and 16.7% and 0% always favoring the GeT arm. CONCLUSIONS: This first randomized trial in metastatic uveal melanoma showed a superior PFS and a trend for a higher response/stabilization rate of the GeT combination over T.     

Neoadjuvant Gemcitabine/treosulfan Chemotherapy for Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma

The median survival for patients with glioblastoma is 12 months. The authors evaluated whether preirradiation gemcitabine/treosulfan (GeT) chemotherapy followed by standard radiotherapy improved outcome in patients with glioblastoma. Seventeen patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma were enrolled in a prospective, unicenter trial of preirradiation GeT chemotherapy. Chemotherapy included up to 4 cycles of intravenous gemcitabine (1000 mg/m² body surface) and treosulfan (3500 mg/m² body surface) on days 1 and 8 of 28 days treatment cycles. Involved field radiotherapy (60 Gy in 30 fractions) was given after chemotherapy or earlier in the case of disease progression or drug intolerance. There was no specific treatment-related neurotoxicity reported, but in 3 of 17 patients (18%) chemotherapy was stopped because of World Health Organization (WHO) IV hematological toxicity. With GeT chemotherapy alone, there was a median progression-free survival of 12 weeks and a progression-free survival rate at 4 months of 29%. In 16 of 17 patients who subsequently received a full course of radiotherapy, the median progression-free survival from the time of diagnosis was 8 months, and the progression-free survival rate at 12 months was 25% (4 of 16 patients). The median overall survival was 12 months. Neither age nor extent of the residual postoperative tumor predicted the duration of progression-free survival after chemotherapy alone or after chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy. The combination of gemcitabine and treosulfan produced significant hematological toxicity in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. The schedule used in the present study did not confer any significant survival advantage compared with standard involved field radiotherapy alone.     

吉西他滨联合多西他赛治疗晚期软组织肉瘤11例

  目的  探讨吉西他滨联合多西他赛治疗晚期软组织肉瘤的临床疗效。  方法  收集11例对一线化疗药物耐药的晚期软组织肉瘤患者,应用吉西他滨（剂量为900 mg/m2,第1和第8天）联合多西他赛（剂量为100 mg/m2,第8天）每3周重复给药。如患者曾经接受放疗,吉西他滨剂量减为675 mg/m2,多西他赛剂量减为75 mg/m2。  结果  接受化疗的患者总有效率（CR+PR+SD）为54.5%。中位随访时间为19（1~36）个月,中位总生存期为15.4个月（95%CI:8.012~21.598）和中位无进展生存期为8.4个月（95%CI:7.342~8.768）。12个月和36个月的生存率分别是81.8%和27.3%。吉西他滨联合多西他赛治疗软组织肉瘤最常见的非血液学不良反应是黏膜炎,对症处理明显好转。  结论  吉西他滨联合多西他赛作为二线化疗药物治疗晚期软组织肉瘤患者具有较好的临床疗效,且有较好的耐受性,本研究结论为该方案的大样本临床试验提供了依据。      

Second-line chemotherapy of metastatic malignant melanoma with intravenous treosulfan: a phase II multicentre trial

The purpose of this multicentre phase II trial was to evaluate time to progression, survival time, rate of objective tumour response and toxicity of second-line intravenous treosulfan chemotherapy in stage IV melanoma patients. Thirty-one patients with measurable stage IV malignant melanoma and prior chemotherapy with a dacarbazine-containing regimen were included. Of this group, 26 patients were evaluable. All patients received treosulfan (8 g/m intravenously on day 1; cycle repeated every 28 days up to six courses). Patients were evaluated for tumour response, survival time and toxicity. No objective responses (complete or partial) were observed. Five patients (19%) showed no change and 21 had progressive disease after treosulfan treatment. Four patients experienced a minor or mixed response. The median time to progression was 1.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.6-2.1 months) and the median overall survival was 6.5 months (95% CI 3.1-10 months). The 1 year survival rate was 33.9% (95% CI 15.4-52.3%). Leukocytopenia and thrombocytopenia (Common Toxicity Criteria grades 3 and 4) occurred in 15% and 18% of cases, respectively. The non-haematological toxicity of this outpatient regimen was mild. In conclusion, intravenous treosulfan treatment does not induce objective response rates when used as a second-line treatment of metastatic malignant melanoma.     

Docetaxel plus gemcitabine or docetaxel plus cisplatin in advanced pancreatic carcinoma: randomized phase II study 40984 of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Gastrointestinal Group.

PURPOSE: To define the efficacy and toxicity of docetaxel plus gemcitabine or docetaxel plus cisplatin for advanced pancreatic carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Chemotherapy-naive patients with measurable disease and WHO performance status less than 2 were randomly assigned to receive 21-day cycles of gemcitabine 800 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 plus docetaxel 85 mg/m2 on day 8 (arm A) or docetaxel 75 mg/m2 on day 1 plus cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on day 1 (arm B). Primary end points were tumor response and rate of febrile neutropenia grade. RESULTS: Of 96 randomly assigned patients (49 patients in arm A and 47 patients in arm B), 70 patients were analyzed for response (36 in arm A and 34 in arm B) and 89 patients were analyzed for safety (45 in arm A and 44 in arm B). Confirmed responses were observed in 19.4% (95% CI, 8.2% to 36.0%) of patients in arm A and 23.5% (95% CI, 10.7% to 41.2%) in arm B. In arm A, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.9 months (95% CI, 3.0 to 4.7 months), median survival was 7.4 months (95% CI, 5.6 to 11.0 months), and 1-year survival was 30%. In arm B, the median PFS was 2.8 months (95% CI, 2.6 to 4.6 months), median survival was 7.1 months (95% CI, 4.8 to 8.7 months), and 1-year survival was 16%. Febrile neutropenia occurred in 9% and 16% of patients in arms A and B, respectively. CONCLUSION: Both regimens are well tolerated and show activity in advanced pancreatic carcinoma. The safety profile and survival analyses favor docetaxel plus gemcitabine for further evaluation.     

A two-cohort phase II clinical trial of gemcitabine plus treosulfan in patients with metastatic uveal melanoma

In-vitro synergy of treosulfan and gemcitabine has been observed in chemotherapy-resistant tumours. This trial investigated the efficacy of gemcitabine plus treosulfan in metastatic uveal melanoma. Patients received 1000 mg/m of gemcitabine and treosulfan at a dose of 2500 or 3000 mg/m2 in cohort 1 and 3500 or 4000 mg/m2 in cohort 2. Chemotherapy was administered on days 1 and 8 every 4 weeks. Thirty-three patients were treated, 14 in cohort 1 and 19 in cohort 2. In cohort 1 with a treosulfan dose of or=3500 mg/m2 in cohort 2, one had partial remission (5%), 10 showed disease stabilization and eight progressed. An increased survival was observed in the second cohort with higher treosulfan doses, with median survival times of 6.0 versus 9.0 months (P=0.03) in cohort 1 and 2, respectively, and a 1-year survival of 7.1% versus 47.3%, respectively. Based on the observation of prolonged disease stabilization, we recommend further investigation of the gemcitabine/treosulfan combination with a dose of 3500 mg/m2 of treosulfan in metastatic uveal melanoma.     

Multicentre phase II study of gemcitabine and cisplatin in malignant pleural mesothelioma

Malignant pleural mesothelioma is a notoriously chemoresistant tumour. However, a recent single institution study showed an impressive activity of gemcitabine and cisplatin. Our aim is to investigate the efficacy and toxicity of a gemcitabine and cisplatin combination in selected and chemo-naive patients with histologically proven malignant pleural mesothelioma. METHOD: Gemcitabine 1250 mg m(-2) was administered on day 1 and day 8 and cisplatin 80 mg m(-2) was administered on day 1 in a 3-week cycle with a maximum of six cycles. Response and toxicity evaluations were performed according to WHO and NCIC-CTC criteria. Pathology and radiology were centrally reviewed. Results show that in 25 evaluable patients, four PR were observed (ORR 16%, 95% CI 1-31%). Responses of seven patients were unevaluable. No unexpected toxicity occurred. Time to progression was 6 months (5-7 months) with a median survival from registration of 9.6 months (95% CI 8-12 months). In conclusion this trial excludes with 90% power a response rate of greater than 30% in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma using a combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin at the proposed dose and schedule.     

Phase II study of gemcitabine-dexamethasone with or without cisplatin in relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma.

Single-agent gemcitabine has shown encouraging results in patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). This phase II study further explored the potential of a gemcitabine-based regimen in patients with relapsed or refractory MCL. Patients <70 years old received the PDG regimen: gemcitabine (1000 mg/m(2), days 1 and 8), dexamethasone (40 mg/m(2), days 1-4), and cisplatin (100 mg/m(2), day 1). Patients >/=70 years of age received dexamethasone and gemcitabine only (DG regimen). Thirty patients (12 in the DG group, 18 in the PDG group) with a median age 66.5 years (range, 47-81) received a median of six cycles in both groups. The overall response rate was 36.4% [95% confidence interval (CI), 15.2% to 64.6%] with the DG regimen and 44.4% (95% CI 24.6% to 66.3%) with the PDG regimen. The median progression-free survival was 3 months (95% CI 0.0-7.9) in the DG group and 8.5 months (95% CI 4.8-12.2) in the PDG group. With a median follow-up of 38.8 months, 13 patients (including 11 given PDG) are still alive. DG was well tolerated, and thrombocytopenia was the most prevalent toxicity in patients receiving PDG. Both regimens deserve to be further investigated as a backbone for combination chemotherapy in patients with MCL.     

Weekly chemotherapy with docetaxel, gemcitabine and cisplatin in advanced transitional cell urothelial cancer: a phase II trial.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of a combination of weekly docetaxel, gemcitabine and cisplatin in advanced transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the bladder. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-five chemotherapy-na?ve (adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy was allowed) patients with advanced TCC received intravenous docetaxel 35 mg/m2, gemcitabine 800 mg/m2 and cisplatin 35 mg/m2, on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks. Prophylactic granulocyte-colony stimulating factor was given from days 3 to 6 and days 10 to 15, anti-emetics were used routinely. RESULTS: Most (27) patients (77.1%) had a performance status of 0 to 1 and eight (22.9%) had received prior adjuvant or neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy. In the intention-to-treat analysis, the objective response rate was 65.6% [23/35 patients, 95% confidence interval (CI) 47.8% to 80.9%]. Ten patients (28.5%) achieved a complete response (95% CI 14.6% to 46.3%) and 13 (37.1%) a partial response (95% CI 21.5% to 55.0%). Median survival time was 15.5 months, median duration of response was 10.2 months and median time to progression was 8.9 months. Ten patients (28.5%) developed grade 3/4 neutropenia, including five (14.3%) who experienced febrile neutropenia, which was successfully treated. Grade 3/4 anaemia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 20% and 25.7% of patients, respectively; four patients required platelet transfusions. There were no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Weekly docetaxel, gemcitabine plus cisplatin is a highly effective treatment for chemotherapy-na?ve advanced TCC, and causes only moderate toxicity. This regimen should be considered as a suitable option that deserves further prospective evaluation through randomised phase III trials.     

Rational drug sequencing of paclitaxel, gemcitabine and carboplatin in patients with untreated stage IV and select stage IIIB non-small cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION: To conduct a phase II study evaluating the efficacy of rationally sequenced paclitaxel, gemcitabine, and carboplatin in patients with stage IV or select stage IIIB non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Patients with select stages IIIB (pleural effusion) and IV NSCLC with an ECOG performance status of 0-1 and no prior chemotherapy for their disease were eligible to participate. Treatment was delivered as follows: paclitaxel at 70 mg/m2 followed by gemcitabine at 300 mg/m2 on day 1, with carboplatin (AUC 5) on day 2 of a 28-day cycle. Response was assessed after every two cycles of therapy. The primary endpoint of this trial was response rate, with secondary endpoints of time to progression and 1 year overall survival. RESULTS: Twenty patients were enrolled on protocol, one of whom never received chemotherapy. The median number of cycles delivered was 3 (range 0-8). A partial response rate of 42% (8/19; 95% CI: 20-67%) and a stable disease rate of 11% (2/19; 95% CI: 1-33%) were observed. The median overall survival time was 9.6 months (95% CI: 4.6-16.6), with a 1 year overall survival rate of 42.1% (95% CI: 24.9-71.3%). Eight patients (42%) stopped treatment due to toxicity. CONCLUSION: Paclitaxel followed by gemcitabine and then carboplatin is an active, albeit complex, regimen in the treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC with insufficient advantage to justify continuation of this regimen.     

A multicenter phase II study of sequential vinorelbine and cisplatin followed by docetaxel and gemcitabine in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE: To evaluate the activity and toxicity of the sequential administration of vinorelbine/cisplatin (VC regimen) followed by the docetaxel/gemcitabine (DG regimen) combination in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND TREATMENT: Fifty-nine previously untreated patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC received three cycles of cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) (day 1), and vinorelbine 30 mg/m(2) (days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks; VC regimen), followed by six cycles of docetaxel (65 mg/m(2), day 1) and gemcitabine (1,500 mg/m(2), day 1), (DG regimen) every 2 weeks. RESULTS: One (1.7%) complete and 26 (44.1%) partial responses were achieved for an overall response rate of 45.8% (95% CI 33.05-58.48%); 12 (20.3%) patients had stable disease and 20 (33.9%) progressive disease. The median time to progression was 5.3 months, the median survival time 12.5 months and the 1-year survival rate 51%. The main toxicity was grade III/IV neutropenia occurring in 25.5% of patients; all other hematologic and non-hematologic toxicities were relatively infrequent. CONCLUSIONS: The sequential administration of VC and DG regimens was well tolerated and active against advanced NSCLC and merits to be further evaluated against a single doublet.     

Gemcitabine, vinorelbine and cisplatin combination chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase II trial

The purpose of this phase II trial was to investigate the efficacy and safety of a combination chemotherapy with gemcitabine, vinorelbine and cisplatin in the first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients with NSCLC stage IIIB or IV disease received 1000 mg/m(2) gemcitabine and 25 mg/m(2) vinorelbine on days 1 and 8 and 75 mg/m(2) cisplatin on day 2, every 3 weeks. From December 1998 to May 1999, 31 patients (21 stage IV and 10 stage IIIB disease), with a median age of 59 years (range 40-72 years) were enrolled. The overall intent-to-treat response rate was 45% (95% confidence interval (CI): 27-64%) with 2 complete responders (CR) and 12 partial responders (PR), 7 patients had stable disease and 10 progressed. Median survival was 12.8 months (95% CI: 6.5-12.8+ months), median time to progression was 5.1 months (95% CI: 3.5-7.7 months), and the 1-year survival rate was 52.9% (95% CI: 36.7-76.2%). Patients with stage IIIB disease had a significantly longer overall survival than patients with stage IV disease (P=0.05). Transient World Health Organization (WHO) grade IV leucopenia, anaemia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 3 (10%), 2 (6%) and 3 (10%) patients, respectively. The predominant non-haematological toxicities were alopecia and nausea/vomiting. 15 patients (48%) had WHO grade II and III alopecia and 14 patients (45%) nausea/vomiting. The combination of gemcitabine, vinorelbine and cisplatin has demonstrated major antitumour efficacy in advanced NSCLC with a manageable toxicity profile.     

Cisplatin, gemcitabine, and treosulfan in relapsed stage IV cutaneous malignant melanoma patients

To evaluate the efficacy of cisplatin, gemcitabine, and treosulfan (CGT) in 91 patients with pretreated relapsed AJCC stage IV cutaneous malignant melanoma. Patients in relapse after first-, second-, or third-line therapy received 40 mg m(-2) intravenous (i.v.) cisplatin, 1000 mg m(-2) i.v. gemcitabine, and 2500 mg m(-2) i.v. treosulfan on days 1 and 8. Cisplatin, gemcitabine, and treosulfan therapy was repeated every 5 weeks until progression of disease occurred. A maximum of 11 CGT cycles (mean, two cycles) was administered per patient. Four patients (4%) showed a partial response; 15 (17%) patients had stable disease; and 72 (79%) patients progressed upon first re-evaluation. Overall survival of all 91 patients was 6 months (2-year survival rate, 7%). Patients with partial remission or stable disease exhibited a median overall survival of 11 months (2-year survival rate, 36%), while patients with disease progression upon first re-evaluation had a median overall survival of 5 months (2-year survival rate, 0%). Treatment with CGT was efficient in one-fifth of the pretreated relapsed stage IV melanoma patients achieving disease stabilisation or partial remission with prolonged but limited survival.     

A phase II study of days 1 and 8 combination of docetaxel plus gemcitabine for the second-line treatment of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer and good performance status

OBJECTIVE: We conducted a phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of a combination consisting of second-line docetaxel and gemcitabine in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligibility criteria: histologically confirmed advanced NSCLC with progressive disease to platinum-based chemotherapy, ECOG performance status (PS) 0 or 1, and adequate kidney, liver and bone marrow function. Treatment consisted of docetaxel 36 mg/m(2) i.v. over 60 min followed by gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) i.v. over 30 min on days 1 and 8 of each 3-week cycle for a planned six cycles or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS: Of the 52 patients enrolled, 50 were evaluable for response and toxicity. The mean age was 59 years (range 42-79), 46 male and 4 female. Histology subtypes were: adenocarcinoma 26 patients, bronchioloalveolar 1 patient, large cell carcinoma 5 patients, and squamous cell carcinoma 18 patients. Thirty-eight patients had ECOG PS 1 and 12 patients had PS 0. The median number of cycles administered was four (range 2-6). The overall response rate was 28%. The median follow-up was 9 months (range 5-34 months). The median survival time (MST) was 8.2 months (95% CI, 4-12%), and the 1-year survival was 25%. The median progression-free survival was 4.4 months (95% CI, 2-6%). In the Cox regression model, survival was only significantly affected by the PS. The median survival in patients with PS 0 was 17.8 months (95% CI, 18.8-21.8%) compared with a median survival for patients with PS 1 of 6.1 months (95% CI, 4.1-8.2%) (P=0.0057). Toxicity: three patients had grade 3 anemia, three patients had grade 3 thrombocytopenia, four patients had grade 3 neutropenia and only one patient developed grade 4 febrile neutropenia. Non-hematologic toxicity was also mild; the most frequent was asthenia, with grade 3 in eight patients (16%), and one patient with grade 4. CONCLUSION: This regimen of docetaxel in combination with gemcitabine in advanced second-line NSCLC is an active and safe regimen.     

Paclitaxel, cisplatin, and gemcitabine combination chemotherapy within a multidisciplinary therapeutic approach in metastatic nonsmall cell lung carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Cisplatin-based chemotherapy combinations improve quality of life and survival in advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). The emergence of new active drugs might translate into more effective regimens for the treatment of this disease. METHODS: The objective of this study was to determine the feasibility, response rate, and toxicity of a paclitaxel, cisplatin, and gemcitabine combination to treat metastatic NSCLC. Thirty-five consecutive chemotherapy-naive patients with Stage IV NSCLC and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2 were treated with a combination of paclitaxel (135 mg/m(2) given intravenously in 3 hours) on Day 1, cisplatin (120 mg/m(2) given intravenously in 6 hours) on Day 1, and gemcitabine (800 mg/m(2) given intravenously in 30 minutes) on Days 1 and 8, every 4 weeks. Although responding patients were scheduled to receive consolidation radiotherapy and 24 patients received preplanned second-line chemotherapy after disease progression, the response and toxicity rates reported refer only to the chemotherapy regimen given. RESULTS: All the patients were examined for toxicity; 34 were examinable for response. An objective response was observed in 73.5% of the patients (95% confidence interval [CI], 55.6-87.1%), including 4 complete responses (11.7%). According to intention-to-treat, the overall response rate was 71.4% (95% CI, 53. 7-85.4%). After 154 courses of therapy, the median dose intensity was 131 mg/m(2) for paclitaxel (97.3%), 117 mg/m(2) for cisplatin (97.3%), and 1378 mg/m(2) for gemcitabine (86.2%). World Health Organization Grade 3-4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 39.9% and 11.4% of patients, respectively. There was one treatment-related death. Nonhematologic toxicities were mild. After a median follow-up of 22 months, the median progression free survival rate was 7 months, and the median survival time was 16 months. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of paclitaxel, cisplatin, and gemcitabine is well tolerated and shows high activity in metastatic NSCLC. This treatment merits further comparison with other cisplatin-based regimens.     

Biweekly paclitaxel and gemcitabine for patients with advanced urothelial cancer ineligible for cisplatin-based regimen

BACKGROUND: To avoid cisplatin-related gastrointestinal, renal and other toxicity while maintaining efficacy in the palliative setting or second line chemotherapeutic regimen for cisplatin-resistant urothelial cancer, chemotherapeutic regimens have been investigated that do not include cisplatin. The current study was designed to evaluate efficacy, clinical feasibility and safety of gemcitabine and paclitaxel (GP) regimen in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer who were ineligible for standard cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy. METHODS: Gemcitabine 2500 mg/m(2) and paclitaxel 150 mg/m(2) were administered intravenously every 2 weeks for 23 patients (17 males and 6 females) with advanced urothelial cancer who were ineligible for cisplatin-based chemotherapy; metastatic disease being resistant to cisplatin-based chemotherapy regimen in 14, heavy toxicity in prior cisplatin-based chemotherapy in three, poor ECOG performance in two and impaired renal function in four. Average age was 67 (53-77). Performance status was 0 in 18 patients, 1 in three patients and 2 in two patients. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 30% (95% CI 15.6-50.8%). Of the 23 patients, no patient attained CR and 7 patients had PR. In the cisplatin-resistant group, the response rate was 14.2% (2/14; 95% CI 4.0-39.9%). In the remaining patients ineligible for cisplatin, the response rate was 55.5% (5/9; 95% CI 26.6-81.1%). The median duration of response was 4 months (range 3-8). The median duration of survival for all patients was 12.1 months (95% CI 8.6-15.5). Myelosuppression, predominantly neutropenia, was the most common serious toxicity and toxicity of Grade 3 or greater was observed in six patients (26%). Among non-hematological toxicity, neuralgia was the most commonly observed and occurred in nine patients (39%) although no patient had toxicity of Grade 3 or greater. Three patients had interstitial pneumonitis possibly attributed to gemcitabine. One patient developed severe bilateral disease after two cycles of the regimen, which was partially resolved with corticosteroid therapy. CONCLUSION: GP regimen is effective in some patients with cisplatin-resistant urothelial cancer and promising as second line chemotherapy. GP regimen is more effective and well tolerated as first line chemotherapy in patients ineligible for cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Toxicity is generally mild but care must be taken for patients with risk of interstitial pneumonitis. A further larger scale study is required to confirm the efficacy of the GP regimen.     

吉西他滨联合顺铂治疗头颈部癌52例分析

目的 评价吉西他滨联合顺铂治疗复发转移性头颈部癌患者的疗效和毒性。方法 52例复发转移性头颈部癌患者接受吉西他滨联合顺铂方案：吉西他滨1000mg／m^2,第1天和第8天;顺铂25mg／m^2,第1～3天;21d为1个疗程。结果 可评价患者52例,3例（5．8％）达完全缓解,19例（36．5％）达部分缓解,有效率42．3％（22／52）。中位疾病进展时间5．0个月,中位生存期9．9个月,1年生存率为43．4％。在既往经含铂方案化疗的32例患者中,2例（6．3％）达完全缓解,11例（34．4％）达部分缓解,有效率为40．6％（13／32）。中位疾病进展时间3．4个月,中位生存期8．3个月,1年生存率为29．2％。主要不良反应为1或2度血液学毒性、皮疹和恶心呕吐。结论 吉西他滨联合顺铂是治疗晚期复发转移性头颈部癌患者安全、有效的联合化疗方案．     

A multicenter, randomized, Phase II study of cisplatin, etoposide, and gemcitabine or cisplatin plus gemcitabine as first-line treatment in patients with poor-prognosis small cell lung carcinoma

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to evaluate the activity and toxicity of combined cisplatin, etoposide, and gemcitabine (PEG) and combined cisplatin plus gemcitabine (PG) in previously untreated patients with extensive-stage and poor-prognosis limited-stage small-cell lung carcinoma. METHODS: One hundred forty patients (70 patients in two arms) were randomized to receive either cisplatin 70 mg/m2 on Day 1, etoposide 50 mg/m2 on Days 1-3, and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on Days 1 and 8 or cisplatin 70 mg/m2 on Day 1 plus gemcitabine 1250 mg/m2 on Days 1 and 8. Both regimens were recycled every 21 days. RESULTS: In total, 626 cycles were delivered (303 cycles of PEG and 323 cycles of PG), with a median of 4 cycles per patient in both arms. The objective response rate was 63% (95% confidence interval [95%CI], 49-71%) for PEG and 57% (95%CI, 43-67%) for PG, with the suggestion of a higher complete response rate in the PEG arm (18.6% and 4.3%, respectively). A similar time to disease progression (6 months in the PEG arm and 7 months in the PG arm) and a similar median survival (9.5 months in the PEG arm and 10 months in the PG arm) were observed in both arms. The PEG regimen was associated with more severe hematologic toxicity in terms of neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, and a higher rate of treatment delays and dose reductions, whereas nonhematologic toxicities did not differ between the two arms. CONCLUSIONS: According to the results of this Phase II randomized trial, the PEG regimen produced a higher complete response rate but more toxicity compared with the PG regimen in patients with extensive-stage or poor-prognosis, limited-stage small cell lung carcinoma.     

Gemcitabine and cisplatin in the treatment of elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: impact of comorbidities on safety and efficacy outcome

The aim of the study was to describe in detail the impact of aging and comorbidities on safety and efficacy of gemcitabine-cisplatin in the subset of elderly with advanced NSCLC. We report the results of our study which enrolled patients aged over 65 years or older. This study included 46 patients consecutively admitted to our Department. Treatment consisted of gemcitabine 1250 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8, and cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on day 2, of a 21-day cycle. The Charlson score method was chosen to evaluate the conditions of comorbidity. All patients were evaluable for toxicity and 44 for activity. A total of 128 courses were administered, with a median of 3 courses per patient and a dose-intensity of 93% and 88% for gemcitabine and cisplatin, respectively. Grade 3-4 neutropenia (22% of patients) and grade 3 asthenia (4.5%), emesis (4.5%) and nephrotoxicity (4.5%) were the most severe adverse events. Univariate analysis of toxicity did not show any significant difference among all groups. The overall response rate was 45.6% (95% CI, 31.3-60). At a median follow up of 13 months, the median and progression-free survival were 15 and 8 months, respectively. The multivariate analysis resulted in objective response and disease control being predictive of longer survival. The combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin appears to be an effective and tolerated regimen for elderly patients with advanced NSCLC, regardless of aging and condition of comorbidities. Prospective randomized trials based on specific geriatric assessment are required to obtain compelling information for the optimal management of elderly patients with advanced NSCLC.     

Gemcitabine and Docetaxel as a Second-Line Treatment in Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcomas

OBJECTIVE Promising anti-tumor activity in patients with metastatic or unresectable soft tissue sarcomas has been reported with gemcitabine and/or docetaxel.METHODS Forty patients with advanced soft tissue sarcomas refractorv to first-line chemotherapv treatment were enrolled.They received:combination of gemcitabine at dose of 900 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 and docetaxel at dose of 100 mg/m2 on day 8,and had this regimen repeated every 3 weeks. If the patients had received the Delvic irradiation in advance. aemcitabine dose was reduced to 675 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 and docetaxel to 75 mg/m2 on day 8,and had it repeated every 3 weeks. RESULTS Gemcitabine/ docetaxel combination was well tolerated by the patients with an overall response of 20%.After median follow-up of 15 months, a median overall survival time was 12 months(95% CI 7.042-16.958)and a median progression free survival time was 6 months(95% CI 5.445-6.545).The most common hematologic toxicity was neutropenia(47.5%)while mucositis was the most common non- hematologic toxicity(45%).The 1-and 2-year survival rates were 50% and 15%,respectively.CONCLUSION This regimen of gemcitabine/docetaxel combination as second-line treatment for the patients with advanced soft tissue sarcomas is effective with acceptable toxicities. These results should be evaluated in a large phase III trial.