Identification and functional characterization of imatinib‐sensitive DTD1‐PDGFRB and CCDC88C‐PDGFRB fusion genes in eosinophilia‐associated myeloid/lymphoid neoplasms

Eosinophilia‐associated myeloid neoplasms with rearrangement of chromosome bands 5q31‐33 are frequently associated with PDGFRB fusion genes, which are exquisitely sensitive to treatment with imatinib. In search for novel fusion partners of PDGFRB, we analyzed three cases with translocation t(5;20)(q33;p11), t(5;14)(q33;q32), and t(5;17;14)(q33;q11;q32) by 5′‐rapid amplification of cDNA ends polymerase chain reaction (5′‐RACE‐PCR) and DNA‐based long‐distance inverse PCR (LDI‐PCR) with primers derived from PDGFRB. LDI‐PCR revealed a fusion between CCDC88C exon 25 and PDGFRB exon 11 in the case with t(5;17;14)(q33;q11;q32) while 5′‐RACE‐PCR identified fusions between CCDC88C exon 10 and PDGFRB exon 12 and between DTD1 exon 4 and PDGFRB exon 12 in the cases with t(5;14)(q33;q32) and t(5;20)(q33;p11), respectively. The PDGFRB tyrosine‐kinase domain is predicted to be retained in all three fusion proteins. The partner proteins contained coiled‐coil domains or other domains, which putatively lead to constitutive activation of the PDGFRB fusion protein. In vitro functional analyses confirmed transforming activity and imatinib‐sensitivity of the fusion proteins. All three patients achieved rapid and durable complete hematologic remissions on imatinib. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Abnormalities of the der(12)t(12;21) in ETV6‐RUNX1 acute lymphoblastic leukemia

ETV6‐RUNX1 fusion [t(12;21)(p13;q22)] occurs in 25% of childhood B‐cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP‐ALL) and is associated with a favorable outcome. Additional abnormalities involving der(21)t(12;21) and nonrearranged chromosome 12 are well characterized but aberrations involving the der(12)t(12;21) have rarely been described. Herein, we describe two novel abnormalities affecting the der(12)t(12;21): a deletion (20/247, 8%) and duplication (10/247, 4%). All 30 patients were under 10 years of age, had a median white blood count of 12.4 × 10⁹/L and 19.2 × 10⁹/L, respectively, with a good outcome. Deletions of der(12)t(12;21) on both sides of the breakpoint were confirmed and mapped: centromeric (12p11.21‐12p13.2) and telomeric (21q22.12‐21q22.3). The size of these deletions extended from 0.4–13.4 to 0.8–2.5 Mb, respectively. The centromeric deletion encompassed the following genes: LRP6, BCL2L14, DUSP16, CREBL2, and CDKN1B. We postulate that this deletion occurs at the same time as the translocation because it was present in all ETV6–RUNX1‐positive cells. A second abnormality representing duplication of the reciprocal RUNX1–ETV6 fusion gene was a secondary event, which we hypothesize arose through mitotic recombination errors. This led to the formation of the following chromosome: der(12)(21qter→21q22.12::12 p13.2‐12 p12.3::12p12.3→12qter). Both abnormalities affect the reciprocal RUNX1–ETV6 fusion product which could either eliminate or amplify its expression and thus contribute to leukemogenesis. However, other consequences such as haploinsufficiency of tumor suppressor genes and amplification of oncogenes could also be driving forces behind these aberrations. In conclusion, this study has defined novel abnormalities in ETV6–RUNX1 BCP‐ALL, which implicate new genes involved in leukemogenesis. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Disruption of the ETV6 gene as a consequence of a rare translocation (12;12)(p13;q13) in treatment-induced acute myeloid leukemia after breast cancer

We describe a case of treatment-induced acute myeloid leukemia M2 after breast cancer with a rare reciprocal t(12;12)(p13;q13) as a secondary cytogenetic abnormality in addition to the t(11;19)(q23;p13.1). Fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis revealed that both ETV6 genes (previously TEL) were located on the same der(12)t(12;12) as a result of t(12;12). Interestingly, the translocated ETV6 gene was disrupted, indicating the breakpoint on the large der(12)t(12;12) to be within the ETV6 gene and thus the possible formation of a new fusion gene. CHOP gene at 12q13, was found to be translocated intact to the other homologue chromosome 12, indicating that the breakpoint on the small der(12) is proximal to CHOP. To the best of our knowledge, our patient represents the first report of the rare t(12;12)(p13;q13) described in treatment-induced leukemia and the possible formation of a new fusion gene.     

SFPQ‐ABL1‐positive B‐cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemias

In recent years, a subgroup of B‐cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP ALL) without an established abnormality (“B‐other”) has been shown to be characterized by rearrangements of ABL1, ABL2, CSF1R, or PDGFRB (a.k.a. ABL‐class genes). Using FISH with probes for these genes, we screened 55 pediatric and 50 adult B‐other cases. Three (6%) of the adult but none of the childhood B‐other cases were positive for ABL‐class aberrations. RT‐PCR and sequencing confirmed a rare SFPQ‐ABL1 fusion in one adult B‐other case with t(1;9)(p34;q34). Only six SFPQ‐ABL1‐positive BCP ALLs have been reported, present case included. A review of these shows that all harbored fusions between exon 9 of SFPQ and exon 4 of ABL1, that the fusion is typically found in adolescents/younger adults without hyperleukocytosis, and that IKZF1 deletions are recurrent. The few patients not treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and/or allogeneic stem cell transplantation relapsed, strengthening the notion that TKI should be added to the therapy of SFPQ‐ABL1‐positive BCP ALL.     

Fusion of PDGFRB to MPRIP,CPSF6, and GOLGB1 in three patients with eosinophilia‐associated myeloproliferative neoplasms

In eosinophilia‐associated myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN‐eo), constitutive activation of protein tyrosine kinases (TK) as consequence of translocations, inversions, or insertions and creation of TK fusion genes is recurrently observed. The most commonly involved TK and their potential TK inhibitors include PDGFRA at 4q12 or PDGFRB at 5q33 (imatinib), FGFR1 at 8p11 (ponatinib), and JAK2 at 9p24 (ruxolitinib). We here report the identification of three new PDGFRB fusion genes in three male MPN‐eo patients: MPRIP‐PDGFRB in a case with t(5;17)(q33;p11), CPSF6‐PDGFRB in a case with t(5;12)(q33;q15), and GOLGB1‐PDGFRB in a case with t(3;5)(q13;q33). The fusion proteins identified by 5′‐rapid amplification of cDNA ends polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or DNA‐based long distance inverse PCR are predicted to contain the TK domain of PDGFRB. The partner genes contain domains like coiled‐coil structures, which are likely to cause dimerization and activation of the TK. In all patients, imatinib induced rapid and durable complete remissions. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Recurrent translocation t(10;17)(p15;q21) in minimally differentiated acute myeloid leukemia results in ZMYND11/MBTD1 fusion

Pediatric acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogeneous disease, characterized by different collaborating karyotypic and molecular abnormalities, which are used in risk group stratification. In ～20% of the pediatric AML cases a specific genetic aberration is still unknown. Minimally differentiated myeloid leukemia or FAB‐type M0 is a rare morphological subtype of AML. The translocation t(10;17)(p15;q21) is described to be recurrent in minimally differentiated AML, but the involved genes and location of the breakpoints have so far not been identified. In this study, we show that this translocation results in an in‐frame translocation fusing exon 12 of the tumor suppressor gene ZMYND11 to exon 3 of the chromatin protein MBTD1, encoding a protein of 1,054 amino acids, while the reciprocal fusion product is predicted to lack a productive start codon. Gene expression profiling of the leukemic cells showed high HOXA expression. ZMYND11, also known as BS69, is a tumor suppressor that specifically recognizes H3K36me3, which is linked to aberrant HOXA expression in leukemogenesis. Aberrant expression of the genes involved in this fusion may thus contribute to the HOXA‐phenotype observed with gene expression profiling. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Identification of four new translocations involving FGFR1 in myeloid disorders

The 8p11 myeloproliferative syndrome (EMS) is associated with three translocations, t(8;13)(p11;q12), t(8;9)(p11;q33), and t(6;8)(q27;p11), that fuse unrelated genes (ZNF198, CEP110, and FOP, respectively) to the entire tyrosine kinase domain of FGFR1. In all cases thus far examined (n = 10), the t(8;13) results in an identical mRNA fusion between ZNF198 exon 17 and FGFR1 exon 9. To determine if consistent fusions are also seen in the variant translocations, we performed RT-PCR on four cases and sequenced the products. For two patients with a t(8;9), we found that CEP110 exon 15 was fused to FGFR1 exon 9. For two patients with a t(6;8), we found that FOP exon 5 (n = 1) or exon 7 (n = 1) was fused to FGFR1 exon 9. To determine if FGFR1 might be involved in other myeloid disorders with translocations of 8p, we developed a two-color FISH assay using two differentially labeled PAC clones that flank FGFR1. Disruption of this gene was indicated in a patient with a t(8;17)(p11;q25) and Ph-negative chronic myeloid leukemia in association with systemic malignant mast cell disease, a patient with acute myeloid leukemia with a t(8;11)(p11;p15), and two cases with T-cell lymphoma, myeloproliferative disorder, and marrow eosinophilia with a t(8;12)(p11;q15) and ins(12;8)(p11;p11p21), respectively. For the patient with the t(8;11), the chromosome 11 breakpoint was determined to be in the vicinity of NUP98. We conclude that 1) all mRNA fusions in EMS result in splicing to FGFR1 exon 9 but breakpoints in FOP are variable, 2) two-color FISH can identify patients with EMS, and 3) the t(8;17)(p11;q25), t(8;11)(p11;p15), t(8;12)(p11;q15), and ins(12;8)(p11;p11p21) are novel karyotypic changes that most likely involve FGFR1.