Ixabepilone plus capecitabine in metastatic breast cancer patients with reduced performance status previously treated with anthracyclines and taxanes: a pooled analysis by performance status of efficacy and safety data from 2 phase III studies

Patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) previously treated with anthracyclines and taxanes often have decreased performance status secondary to extensive tumor involvement. Here, we report the pooled analysis of efficacy and safety data from two similarly designed phase III studies to provide a more precise estimate of benefit of ixabepilone plus capecitabine in MBC patients with Karnofsky’s performance status (KPS) 70–80. Across the studies, anthracycline/taxane-pretreated MBC patients were randomized to receive ixabepilone plus capecitabine or capecitabine alone. Individual patient data for KPS 70–80 subset (n = 606) or KPS 90–100 subset (n = 1349) from the two studies were pooled by treatment. Analysis included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety. In patients with reduced performance status (KPS 70–80), ixabepilone plus capecitabine was associated with improvements in OS (median: 12.3 vs. 9.5 months; HR, 0.75; P = 0.0015), PFS (median: 4.6 vs. 3.1 months; HR, 0.76; P = 0.0021) and ORR (35 vs. 19%) over capecitabine alone. Corresponding results in patients with high performance status (KPS 90–100) were median OS of 16.7 versus 16.2 months (HR, 0.98; P = 0.8111), median PFS of 6.0 versus 4.4 months (HR, 0.58; P = 0.0009), and ORR of 45 versus 28%. The safety profile of combination therapy was similar between the subgroups. Ixabepilone plus capecitabine appeared to show superior efficacy compared to capecitabine alone in MBC patients previously treated with anthracyclines and taxanes, regardless of performance status, with a possible OS benefit favoring KPS 70–80 patients (ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT00080301 and NCT00082433).     

Efficacy of S-1 in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer: cross-resistance to capecitabine

Background  It is not clear what the optimal treatment of chemotherapy is for patients with heavily treated metastatic breast cancer (MBC). We have retrospectively examined the efficacy and safety of S-1 in patients with MBC who had been previously treated with anthracycline, taxane, and capecitabine. Methods  Patients with MBC who had been administered S-1, an oral modulated compound containing a fluoropyrimidine derivative, between November 2001 and June 2003 at the Cancer Institute Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. S-1 at a standard dose of 50 mg/body was administered twice daily for four weeks, followed by a two-week rest period. This was repeated every six weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Results  Thirty-five patients were assessed. The patients were heavily pretreated with anthracycline (100%), taxane (paclitaxel or docetaxel) (100%), capecitabine (100%), vinorelbine (71%), and mitomycin (69%). Median follow-up time of patients was 9.6 months (range, 1.2–26.6). ORR was 3% (95% confidence interval: 0–9%), and CBR was 20% (95% confidence interval: 6–33%). Time to treatment failure was 2.8 months. Overall survival was 21.4 months. Grade 1 or 2 adverse events were observed in 17% and 13%, respectively. Grade 3 events occurred as anorexia (9%), nausea (9%), vomiting (9%), diarrhea (14%), fatigue (3%), and elevation of AST/ALT (3%). No grade 3 was seen as hand-foot syndrome. Neither grade 3 nor 4 was observed in bone marrow suppression. Conclusions  S-1 was fairly well tolerated, but demonstrated very limited activity in capecitabine-pretreated patients who had already been exposed to anthracycline and taxane. It was suggested that S-1 clinically exhibited cross-resistance to capecitabine.     

A multicentre phase II study to evaluate sequential docetaxel followed by capecitabine treatment in anthracycline-pretreated HER-2-negative patients with metastatic breast cancer

Introduction  Treatment of HER-2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients after anthracycline exposure is controversial. Docetaxel/capecitabine is a promising regimen, but the administration schedule is not well established. Materials and methods  Treatment included 3 cycles of docetaxel 100 mg/m² day 1 every 21 days followed by 3 cycles of capecitabine 1250 mg/m²/12 h days 1–14. Patients not progressing were maintained with capecitabine 900 mg/m²/12 h on days 1–14 every 21 days until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Results  Fifty-three anthracycline-pretreated patients were enrolled: median age 54 years, ECOG grade 0–1 86.7%. Most of the women received adjuvant chemotherapy (81%) and 5 patients (9%) had had prior metastatic chemotherapy treatment. Median time from anthracycline exposure was 29 months. ORR (intent-to-treatment analysis) after the sequential therapy was 51% (CI 95% 37–65) with 15% (CI 95% 7–28) of patients reaching complete responses. Median time to progression was 8.2 (CI 95% 7.1–10.7) months, with 61.9% (CI 95% 45.6–76.4) of the patients free of disease after 6 months. Median overall survival was not reached after a median follow-up of 10.4 months, and 75% of the patients were alive after 14.3 months. Survival rate after 12 months was 81.1% (CI 95% 68.0–90.6). The most frequent NCI grade 3–4 toxicities were hair loss (28.3%), asthenia (15.1%), stomatitis (11.32%) and nausea (11.32%). Severe hand-foot syndrome rate was 7.5%. Conclusions  Sequential docetaxel-capecitabine is feasible, effective and well tolerated in first-line MBC treatment. Evaluation of this schedule in randomised studies is warranted.     

Randomised phase III trial of vinflunine plus capecitabine versus capecitabine alone in patients with advanced breast cancer previously treated with an anthracycline and resistant to taxane

BackgroundCapecitabine is an approved standard therapy for anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (BC). Vinflunine has demonstrated single-agent activity in phase II studies in this setting and activity and tolerability when combined with capecitabine. We compared the combination of vinflunine plus capecitabine (VC) with single-agent capecitabine.Patients and methodsPatients with locally recurrent/metastatic BC previously treated or resistant to an anthracycline and resistant to taxane therapy were randomly assigned to either vinflunine (280 mg/m², day 1) plus oral capecitabine [825 mg/m² twice daily (b.i.d.), days 1–14] every 3 weeks (q3w) or single-agent oral capecitabine (1250 mg/m² b.i.d., days 1–14) q3w. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by an independent review committee. The study had 90% power to detect a 30% improvement in PFS.ResultsOverall, 770 patients were randomised. PFS was significantly longer with VC than with capecitabine alone [hazard ratio, 0.84, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.71–0.99; log-rank P = 0.043; median 5.6 versus 4.3 months, respectively]. Median overall survival was 13.9 versus 11.7 months with VC versus capecitabine alone, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.83–1.15; log-rank P = 0.77). No difference in quality of life was observed between the two treatment arms. The most common adverse events (NCI CTCAE version 3.0) in the combination arm were haematological and gastrointestinal. Grade 4 neutropenia was more frequent with VC (12% versus 1% with capecitabine alone); febrile neutropenia occurred in 2% versus 0.5%, respectively. Hand-foot syndrome was less frequent with VC (grade 3: 4% versus 19% for capecitabine alone). Peripheral neuropathy was uncommon in both arms (grade 3: 1% versus 0.3%).ConclusionsVinflunine combined with capecitabine demonstrated a modest improvement in PFS and an acceptable safety profile compared with capecitabine alone in patients with anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated locally recurrent/metastatic BC.ClinicalTrials.govNCT01095003.     

A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study of maintenance enzastaurin with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin plus bevacizumab after first-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND:

Enzastaurin and bevacizumab have demonstrated synergistic antitumor effects and, in phase 1 studies, the combination was well tolerated. This phase 2 study assessed enzastaurin with 5‐fluorouracil/leucovorin plus bevacizumab as maintenance therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC).

METHODS:

Patients with locally advanced or MCRC and stable or responding disease after completing 6 cycles of first‐line chemotherapy randomly received a loading dose of enzastaurin 1125 mg, followed by 500 mg/d subsequent doses or placebo. Both arms received 5‐fluorouracil/leucovorin (leucovorin 400 mg/m² intravenously [IV], 5‐fluorouracil 400‐mg/m² bolus, 5‐fluorouracil 2400 mg/m² IV) plus bevacizumab 5 mg/kg IV, every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was progression‐free survival (PFS), from randomization. Overall survival (OS) and PFS were also assessed from start of first‐line therapy. Enrollment was stopped, and the final analysis was conducted after 73 PFS events.

RESULTS:

Fifty‐eight patients were randomized to enzastaurin and 59 to placebo. For the enzastaurin and placebo arms, respectively, the median cycles received were 9 and 10, and the median PFS was 5.8 and 8.1 months (hazard ratio [HR], 1.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.84‐2.16; P = .896). Median OS was not calculable because of high censoring (77.6% enzastaurin; 91.5% placebo). The median PFS from start of first‐line therapy was 8.9 months for enzastaurin and 11.3 months for placebo (HR, 1.39; 95% CI, 0.86‐2.23; P = .913). More enzastaurin patients developed thrombosis or embolism compared with placebo (15.8% and 1.7%; P = .008). One possibly enzastaurin‐related death occurred because of arrhythmia.

CONCLUSIONS:

Enzastaurin combined with bevacizumab‐based therapy is tolerable, but does not improve PFS during maintenance therapy in patients with MCRC compared with bevacizumab‐based therapy alone. Cancer 2012. © 2011 American Cancer Society.     

Trastuzumab plus capecitabine vs. lapatinib plus capecitabine in patients with trastuzumab resistance and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer

The purpose of this prospective, nonrandomized, controlled study was to compare the regimen of continuously administering trastuzumab and capecitabine (HX) with the regimen of lapatinib plus capecitabine (LX) for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients who are resistant to trastuzumab and have previously received taxane treatment. The patients in the HX group received trastuzumab (6 mg/kg every 21 days following a loading dose of 8 mg/kg on cycle 1) and capecitabine (2,000 mg/m²/day, days 1 to 14 every 21 days). The patients in the LX group received lapatinib (1,250 mg/day) and capecitabine (2,000 mg/m²/day, days 1 to 14 every 21 days). The median progression-free survival (PFS) of the patients in the HX and LX groups was 4.5 vs. 6.0 months, respectively (p?=?0.006). The proportion of patients having a PFS ≥6 months in the HX and LX groups was 30 vs. 55 %, respectively (p?=?0.005). The incidence rate of new brain metastases during treatment was 12 and 3 % in the HX and LX groups, respectively, which was not significantly different (p?=?0.16). In conclusion, application of the lapatinib plus capecitabine regimen in MBC patients with a trastuzumab-resistant tumor can more effectively control the disease compared with continuous administration of trastuzumab plus capecitabine.     

Efficacy and safety of trastuzumab plus capecitabine in heavily pretreated patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer

Purpose We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of combination therapy of trastuzumab plus capecitabine in heavily pretreated patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Methods Patients with HER2-positive MBC who had been administered the combination therapy between July 2003 and July 2006 at the Cancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo, were retrospectively reviewed. Capecitabine (828 mg/m²) was given twice daily for 3 weeks followed by a 1-week rest period; this was repeated every 4 weeks. Trastuzumab was given at 4 mg/kg as an initial loading dose intravenously, followed by 2 mg/kg weekly. We investigated objective response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), and time-to-treatment failure (TTF) according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors guidelines. Adverse events were graded according to the National Cancer Institute, Common Toxicity Criteria, version 3.0. Results A total of 49 patients were assessed and median follow-up time of patients was 16.2 months (1.4–43.5 months). ORR was 16% (95% confidence interval: 7–30%) and CBR was 47% (95% confidence interval: 32–62%). Median TTF was 5.4 months. Common adverse effects were hand–foot syndrome, liver dysfunction, and bone marrow suppression. Grade 3 adverse events were observed in nine patients (18%). One patient (2%) suffered from symptomatic chronic heart failure, which improved after discontinuation of trastuzumab. Conclusions The combination therapy of trastuzumab plus capecitabine is effective and tolerable for heavily pretreated patients with HER2-positive MBC.     

Capecitabine plus paclitaxel versus epirubicin plus paclitaxel as first-line treatment for metastatic breast cancer: efficacy and safety results of a randomized, phase III trial by the AGO Breast Cancer Study Group

Capecitabine/taxane combinations are highly active in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). We conducted a randomized, phase III, noninferiority trial comparing capecitabine plus paclitaxel (XP) with epirubicin plus paclitaxel (EP) as first-line therapy for MBC, regarding progression-free survival (PFS) as primary efficacy endpoint. Females who had received no prior chemotherapy for MBC were randomized to six 3-weekly cycles of XP (capecitabine 1000 mg/m² b.i.d., days 1–14; paclitaxel 175 mg/m² 3-h infusion, day 1) or EP (epirubicin 60 mg/m² 1-h infusion, day 1; paclitaxel as above). Secondary endpoints included response rate, overall survival, tolerability, and quality of life (QoL). Each arm included 170 patients, most of whom received all six cycles as planned. The difference in means of (logarithmic) PFS times (?0.205) did not meet the pre-defined level for noninferiority (?0.186). However, PFS was similar in the two arms [HR: XP vs. EP: 1.012 (95 % CI 0.785–1.304); median 10.4 months XP vs. 9.2 months EP]. Overall survival was also similar [HR 1.027 (95 % CI 0.740–1.424); median 22.0 vs. 26.1 months], and response rate was 47 % versus 42 %. Both regimens were tolerable: there were more grade 3/4 diarrhea and grade 3 hand–foot syndromes with XP and more grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities with EP. There were no major differences in QoL. Although, noninferiority of XP to EP was formally not proven, first-line XP was active and feasible. XP is a valid first-line alternative to anthracycline/taxane regimens, especially in patients previously treated with adjuvant anthracyclines.     

Maintenance of clinical efficacy after dose reduction of ixabepilone plus capecitabine in patients with anthracycline- and taxane-resistant metastatic breast cancer: a retrospective analysis of pooled data from 2 phase III randomized clinical trials

BackgroundThis retrospective analysis aimed to determine whether early dose reduction impacts the efficacy of ixabepilone plus capecitabine in women with metastatic breast cancer (MBC).Patients and MethodsIn 2 phase III trials, patients (N = 1973) with anthracycline/taxane–pretreated MBC were randomized to receive ixabepilone 40 mg/m² on day 1 plus capecitabine 1000 mg/m² twice daily (BID) on days 1 to 14 or single-agent capecitabine 1250 mg/m² BID on days 1 to 14 of a 3-week course. Because of the similar design and populations, data from trials were pooled to evaluate efficacy of the combination regimen among women who did or did not undergo ixabepilone dose reduction during the first 4 courses. To adjust for bias resulting from selecting patients with inherently better outcome based on longer treatment durations, these analyses were restricted to patients who received ≥ 4 courses of ixabepilone.ResultsThe pooled cohort included 566 patients with measurable disease who were evaluable for efficacy. Patients who had early dose reduction showed similar objective response rates (ORRs) and progression-free survival (PFS) as did those with no/late dose reduction. ORRs were 62.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 55.8%-69.0%) and 55.3% (95% CI, 49.9%-60.6%), respectively; median PFS was 7.2 months (95% CI, 6.6-8.0) and 7.0 months (95% CI, 6.5-7.5), respectively (hazard ratio = 0.98; 95% CI, 0.83-1.17).ConclusionThese data suggest that early ixabepilone dose reduction did not affect the overall efficacy of ixabepilone plus capecitabine in patients with MBC who received ≥ 4 courses of treatment. By making appropriate dose reductions, ixabepilone-related toxicities can be minimized while maintaining clinical efficacy.     

Efficacy and safety of ixabepilone plus capecitabine in elderly patients with anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer

ObjectivesData on chemotherapy regimens in elderly patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) are limited. The aim of this retrospective pooled analysis was to determine efficacy and safety of ixabepilone plus capecitabine versus capecitabine alone in patients with MBC aged ≥ 65 years.Materials and MethodsA total of 1973 patients with MBC previously treated with or resistant to anthracyclines and taxanes were randomized in two open-label, multinational, phase 3 studies (study 046 and study 048). Patients received ixabepilone (40 mg/m² as a 3-hour intravenous infusion every 3 weeks) plus oral capecitabine (1000 mg/m² administered twice each day), or capecitabine alone (1250 mg/m² twice each day).ResultsIn total, 251 randomized patients were aged ≥ 65 years (ixabepilone plus capecitabine, n = 116; capecitabine monotherapy, n = 135). Efficacy results were consistent in patients aged < 65 and ≥ 65 years with respect to the observed improvement in progression-free survival and objective response rate with ixabepilone plus capecitabine compared with capecitabine alone. No significant differences in overall survival between arms were observed for either subgroup. In the ixabepilone plus capecitabine arm, grade 3/4 hematologic adverse events (AEs) were similar in both subgroups except leukopenia and febrile neutropenia, which had a higher incidence in patients aged ≥ 65 years. The majority of grade 3/4 nonhematologic AEs were similar in the two subgroups, including fatigue, peripheral sensory neuropathy, and hand–foot syndrome.ConclusionThe combination of ixabepilone plus capecitabine maintains its efficacy in elderly patients with anthracycline and taxane pretreated MBC, with a similar safety profile to patients aged < 65 years.     

A phase II trial of capecitabine in combination with the farnesyltransferase inhibitor tipifarnib in patients with anthracycline-treated and taxane-resistant metastatic breast cancer: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study (E1103)

Capecitabine produces an objective response rate of up to 25% in anthracycline-treated, taxane-resistant metastatic breast cancer (MBC). The farnesyltransferase inhibitor tipifarnib inhibits Ras signaling and has clinical activity when used alone in MBC. The objective of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety of tipifarnib-capecitabine combination in MBC patients who were previously treated with an anthracycline and progressed on taxane therapy. Eligible patients received oral capecitabine 1,000 mg/m2 twice daily plus oral tipifarnib 300 mg twice daily on days 1-14 every 21 days. The primary endpoint was ORR. The trial was powered to detect an improvement in response rate from 25 to 40%. Among 63 eligible, partial response occurred in six patients (9.5%; 90% CI 4.2-17.9%), median progression-free survival was 2.6 months (95% CI 2.1-4.4), and median overall survival was 11.4 months (95% CI 7.7-14.0). Dose modifications were required for 43 patients (68%) for either tipifarnib and/or capecitabine. Grades 3 and 4 toxicities were seen in 30 patients (44%; 90% CI 44.4-67.0%) and 11 patients (16%; 90% CI 10.8-29.0%), respectively. The most common grade 3 toxicities included neutropenia, nausea, and vomiting; and the most common grade 4 toxicity was neutropenia (8 out of 11 cases). The tipifarnib-capecitabine combination is not more effective than capecitabine alone in MBC patients who were previously treated with an anthracycline and taxane therapy.     

Concurrent capecitabine and whole-brain radiotherapy for treatment of brain metastases in breast cancer patients

Preclinical data have demonstrated that ionizing radiation acts synergistically with capecitabine. This report retrospectively assessed the use of capecitabine concurrently with whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) in patients with brain metastases from breast cancer. From January 2003 to March 2005, five breast cancer patients with brain metastases were referred for WBRT with concurrent capecitabine. Median age was 44 years (range: 38–53). The median dose of capecitabine was 1,000 mg/m² twice daily for 14 days (day1–14). Treatment cycles were repeated every 21 days, concurrently with WBRT (30 Gy, 3 Gy per fraction, 5 days per week). Median survival after starting WBRT plus capecitabine was 6.5 months (range 1–34 months). One patient achieved a complete response. Two patients achieved partial response, including one with local control lasting until most recent follow-up. One patient had stable disease. The remaining patient was not assessable for response because of early death. Most commonly reported adverse events were nausea (n = 2) and headache (n = 2), always grade 1. Other toxicities were grade 3 hand/foot syndrome (n = 1), moderate anemia requiring transfusion and dose reduction of capecitabine (n = 1), and grade 1 mucositis (n = 1). Although promising, these preliminary data warrant further assessment of capecitabine-based chemoradiation in brain metastases from breast cancer and need to be further validated in the setting of a clinical trial. An erratum to this article can be found at     

Phase II study of an all-oral combination of vinorelbine with capecitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer

Purpose  Combination of intravenous (i.v.) vinorelbine and capecitabine was shown to be feasible and effective in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). In an effort to improve patient convenience and to prolong infusion-free survival, we investigated in first-line treatment a regimen combining oral vinorelbine and capecitabine in a phase II study. Patients and methods  Fifty-two patients (median age, 60 years) with MBC received the combination consisting of oral vinorelbine 60 mg/m² on days 1, 8 and 15 plus capecitabine 1,000 mg/m² bid given from day 1 to day 14 in an open-label, multicentre phase II study [the recommended doses were established in a phase I study (Nolé et al. in Ann Oncol 17:332–339, 2006)]. Cycles were repeated every 3 weeks. Results  Seventy-nine percent of the patients had received prior adjuvant chemotherapy and 81% presented with visceral involvement. The median number of administered cycles per patient was 7 (range 1–18). Twenty-three responses were documented and validated by an independent panel review, yielding response rates of 44.2% (95% CI, 30.5–58.7) in the 52 enrolled patients and 54.8% (95% CI, 38.7–70.2) in the 42 evaluable patients. Median progression-free survival and median overall survival were 8.4 and 25.8 months, respectively. Neutropenia was the main dose-limiting toxicity but complications were uncommon, only one patient having experienced febrile neutropenia. Other frequently reported adverse events included, fatigue, nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea and constipation, stomatitis and hand-foot syndrome, which were rarely severe. Conclusions  This regimen combining oral vinorelbine with capecitabine is effective and manageable in the first-line treatment of MBC. Oral vinorelbine on days 1, 8 and 15 with capecitabine from days 1 to 14 every 3 weeks represents a convenient option which offers an all-oral treatment to the patients and prolongs their infusion-free survival.     

A multicenter,observational study of metastatic breast cancer patients who were treated with eribulin mesylate or taxane‐based regimens

1 Aim

This multicenter, observational study aimed to investigate the survival benefit of eribulin as well as that of taxane‐based regimens in Japanese patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in a real‐world setting.

2 Methods

This study enrolled women with MBC who received eribulin or taxane‐based regimens with or without bevacizumab in routine clinical practice from July 2011 to March 2014. Patients were followed until September 2015. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included progression‐free survival (PFS), post‐progression survival (PPS) and adverse events. Efficacy findings were adjusted according to demographics.

3 Results

In total, 216 patients receiving eribulin monotherapy (n = 101), taxane monotherapy (n = 73) or taxane plus bevacizumab (n = 42) were followed for a median time of 15.4 months. Median OS, PFS and PPS were 22.3, 8.1 and 14 months in the eribulin monotherapy group; 13.2, 3.6 and 7.6 months in the taxane monotherapy group; and 12.9, 5.7 and 6.3 months, in the taxane plus bevacizumab group, respectively. The incidence of neutropenia was 67.3, 41.1 and 16.7%, and the incidence of grade 4 neutropenia was 1.0, 8.2 and 7.1% in the eribulin monotherapy, taxane monotherapy and taxane plus bevacizumab groups, respectively. One patient (1.0%) discontinued eribulin and 18 patients (15.7%) discontinued taxane‐based regimens because of adverse events.

4 Conclusion

In Japanese MBC patients in a real‐world setting, eribulin showed a survival benefit and tolerability similar to that in previous reports.     

培美曲塞联合卡培他滨治疗晚期乳腺癌的疗效观察

目的观察培美曲塞联合卡培他滨治疗晚期乳腺癌的临床疗效和不良反应。方法培美曲塞500mg/m2,第1天;卡培他滨2500mg/（m2·d）,分2次口服,第1～14天,21d为1个周期。所有病例均接受至少2个周期的化疗。结果 27例患者入组均可评价疗效,CR率3.7%（1/27）,PR率22.2%（6/27）,SD率37.0%（10/27）,PD率37.0%（10/27）,有效率25.9%（7/27）,临床获益率55.6%（15/27）。中位随访期10个月,中位TTP7个月,中位OS9.5个月,1年生存率为66.7%。主要不良反应为骨髓毒性及手足综合征,Ⅲ度及Ⅳ度白细胞减少为18.5%（5/27）。手足综合征发生率77.7%（21/27）,其中,Ⅲ度及Ⅳ度手足综合征发生率为7.4%（2/27）。结论培美曲塞联合卡培他滨方案治疗蒽环类和紫杉类耐药转移性乳腺癌有较好的疗效,患者耐受性好,值得临床进一步研究。     

Ixabepilone plus capecitabine for breast cancer patients with an early metastatic relapse after adjuvant chemotherapy: two clinical trials

BackgroundDespite recent advances in treating patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC), outcomes remain poor. Ixabepilone is a semisynthetic analogue of epothilone B with low susceptibility to multiple mechanisms of tumor-cell resistance. This review examined the results of 2 phase III clinical trials of ixabepilone in patients with drug-resistant or heavily pretreated, locally advanced breast cancer or MBC.Patients and MethodsIn both studies, women with locally advanced breast cancer or MBC pretreated with, or resistant to, taxanes or anthracyclines were randomly assigned to ixabepilone plus capecitabine, or capecitabine alone, until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred.ResultsIxabepilone plus capecitabine significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) compared with capecitabine alone. The median PFS was prolonged by 1.5 months and 1.8 months in the 2 studies (hazard ratio, < 0.8 in both studies; P ≥ .001). These observations remained valid within several patient subsets: those receiving ixabepilone as first-line therapy, those with taxane-resistant disease, and those with particularly poor prognostic features. Ixabepilone plus capecitabine significantly improved overall survival (OS) compared with capecitabine in patients with symptomatic disease (12.3 vs. 9.5 months, respectively; P = .015). Peripheral neuropathy with ixabepilone was generally reversible and was effectively managed by dosage reduction in most patients. Ixabepilone did not exacerbate capecitabine-induced hand-foot syndrome or diarrhea.ConclusionThe results of these 2 large phase III trials suggest that ixabepilone plus capecitabine may improve treatment outcomes for patients with locally advanced breast cancer or MBC resistant to, or heavily pretreated with, taxanes or anthracyclines, even in those with poor prognostic features.     

Capecitabine monotherapy in patients with anthracycline-and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer

The selection of chemotherapeutic regimens is challenging for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients whose diseases have failed to respond to anthracyline and taxane. Capecitabine has advantages of oral administration and favorable toxicity profiles. This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of capecitabine and to identify the subgroup of patients who would potentially have benefit from capecitabine monotherapy in patients with anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated MBC. Female patients with MBC who had been previously treated with anthracycline and taxane received oral capecitabine 2500 mg/m² divided in two doses daily for 2 wk with 1-wk rest period. Between September, 1999, and December, 2002, a total of 38 patients were enrolled. Among the 36 evaluable patients, one patient achieved a complete response (CR), 9 patients had partial responses (PRs), and 13 patients had stable diseases (SDs). Response rate was 26% [95% confidence interval (CI), 12–40%] and the tumor control rate (TCR, CR+PR+SD) was 61% (95% CI, 45–77%). The median follow-up duration was 27.8 mo. The median duration of response was 8.9 mo, the median time to progression was 4.6 mo, and the median overall survival was 18.1 mo. The major toxicities were hand-foot syndrome, diarrhea, and emesis. There was no treatment-related death. The predictors of better overall survival were positivity of hormone receptor, disease-free survival longer than 1 yr, non-refractoriness to anthracycline, and fewer number (≤3) of involved organs. Capecitabine monotherapy is effective and well tolerated for MBC patients who had previously been treated with anthracycline and taxane. The TCR could predict overall survival as well as the objective respose in this study, suggesting a possible role of TCR as a surrogate marker for survival in MBC patients on salvage chemotherapy. The patients who have relatively slow growing tumor and less tumor burden could have benefit from capecitabine monotherapy following anthracycline- and taxane-based chemotherapy.     

Randomized phase III trial of capecitabine compared with bevacizumab plus capecitabine in patients with previously treated metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial compared the efficacy and safety of capecitabine with or without bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody to vascular endothelial growth factor, in patients with metastatic breast cancer previously treated with an anthracycline and a taxane. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive capecitabine (2,500 mg/m2/d) twice daily on day 1 through 14 every 3 weeks, alone or in combination with bevacizumab (15 mg/kg) on day 1. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS), as determined by an independent review facility. RESULTS: From November 2000 to March 2002, 462 patients were enrolled. Treatment arms were balanced. No significant differences were found in the incidence of diarrhea, hand-foot syndrome, thromboembolic events, or serious bleeding episodes between treatment groups. Of other grade 3 or 4 adverse events, only hypertension requiring treatment (17.9% v 0.5%) was more frequent in patients receiving bevacizumab. Combination therapy significantly increased the response rates (19.8% v 9.1%; P = .001); however, this did not result in a longer PFS (4.86 v 4.17 months; hazard ratio = 0.98). Overall survival (15.1 v 14.5 months) and time to deterioration in quality of life as measured by the Functional Assessment Of Cancer Treatment--Breast were comparable in both treatment groups. CONCLUSION: Bevacizumab was well tolerated in this heavily pretreated patient population. Although the addition of bevacizumab to capecitabine produced a significant increase in response rates, this did not translate into improved PFS or overall survival.     

A phase II,randomized, multicenter study evaluating the combination of lapatinib and vinorelbine in women with ErbB2 overexpressing metastatic breast cancer

Lapatinib is approved in combination with capecitabine for treatment of patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) who have progressed on prior trastuzumab in the metastatic setting. Vinorelbine is an important chemotherapy option for MBC. We evaluated efficacy and safety of lapatinib plus vinorelbine, compared with lapatinib plus capecitabine, in women with HER2-positive MBC. In this open-label, multicenter, phase II study, eligible patients (N = 112) were randomized 2:1 to lapatinib plus vinorelbine [(N = 75) 1,250 mg orally once daily (QD) continuously plus 20 mg/m²/day intravenously] or lapatinib plus capecitabine [(N = 37) 1,250 mg orally QD continuously plus 2,000 mg/m²/day orally, 2 doses]. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Other endpoints included overall survival (OS) and safety. Patients progressing within the study were given the option of crossover to the other treatment arm; time to second progression was an exploratory endpoint. Patient demographics, stratification, and prognostic factors were well balanced between treatments. Median PFS in both arms was 6.2 months [95 % confidence interval (CI) 4.2, 8.8 (lapatinib plus vinorelbine); 4.4, 8.3 (lapatinib plus capecitabine)]. Median OS on lapatinib plus vinorelbine was 24.3 months (95 % CI 16.4, NE) and 19.4 months (95 % CI 16.4, 27.2) on lapatinib plus capecitabine. In total, 42 patients opted to cross over; median PFS was 3.2 months (95 % CI 1.7, 5.1) on lapatinib plus vinorelbine and 4.0 months (95 % CI 2.1, 5.8) on lapatinib plus capecitabine. Lapatinib plus vinorelbine offers an effective treatment option for patients with HER2-overexpressing MBC, having displayed comparable efficacy and tolerability rates to lapatinib plus capecitabine.     

SWOG S0215: a phase II study of docetaxel and vinorelbine plus filgrastim with weekly trastuzumab for HER2-positive,stage IV breast cancer

SWOG trial S0102 showed significant activity of the combination of docetaxel and vinorelbine in HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC). For HER2-positive patients, additional benefit may occur with the addition of trastuzumab due to its synergy with docetaxel and vinorelbine. Patients with HER2-positive MBC, but without prior chemotherapy for MBC or adjuvant taxane, were eligible. Docetaxel (60 mg/m²) was given intravenously on Day 1, vinorelbine (27.5 mg/m²) intravenously on Days 8 and 15, and filgrastim (5 μg/kg) on Days 2–21 of a 21-day cycle. In addition, patients received weekly infusions of trastuzumab (2 mg/kg) after an initial bolus of 4 mg/kg. The primary outcome was 1 year overall survival (OS), with secondary outcomes of progression-free survival (PFS), response rate, and toxicity. Due to slow accrual (February 2003–December 2006), enrollment was stopped after 76 of 90 planned patients. There have been 32 deaths and 51 progressions among the 74 eligible patients who received treatment. The estimated 1 year OS was 93% (95% CI 84–97%) with a median of 48 months. One-year PFS was 70% (95% CI 58–79%) with a median of 20 months. Response rate for measurable disease was 84%. No deaths were attributed to treatment. Grade 4 toxicities were reported for 19% with neutropenia the most common (15%). The most common grade 3 toxicities (33%) were leucopenia (14%) and fatigue (10%). The combination of trastuzumab, docetaxel, and vinorelbine is effective as first-line chemotherapy in HER2-positive MBC with minimal toxicity. One-year survival estimates are among the highest reported in this population.