Oral weekly ibandronate prevents bone loss in postmenopausal women

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the efficacy, safety, and dose-response of once-weekly oral ibandronate in the prevention of postmenopausal bone loss. DESIGN: This was a multi-centre, placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized, 24-month phase II/III dose-finding study. SETTING: Primary care units in 14 osteoporosis centres. SUBJECTS: A total of 630 women were stratified into four strata according to time since menopause (TSM, 1-3 vs. >3 years) and baseline bone mineral density (BMD; normal: T-score > or =1 vs. osteopenic: -2.5 < or = T-score < or = 1) of the lumbar spine. INTERVENTIONS: Within each stratum women were further randomized to receive once-weekly ibandronate (5, 10, or 20 mg week-1) or placebo for 24 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Efficacy parameters were the relative changes from baseline in spine (L1-4) and hip BMD, and biochemical markers of bone turnover (serum and urinary C-telopeptide of collagen type I (CTx), osteocalcin, and alkaline phosphatase) measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and enzyme immunoassays, respectively. RESULTS: Once-weekly therapy with ibandronate induced dose-dependent increases in spine and hip BMD. At month 24, differences between the relative changes in spine and hip BMD induced by 20 mg ibandronate and placebo was 4.0 and 2.7%, respectively. Similar or more pronounced differences were seen in osteopenic women of TSM 1-3 years (5.3 and 3.5%) and of TSM >3 years (3.5 and 2.9%), respectively. A dose-dependent suppression of all biochemical markers of bone turnover was observed with significant decreases in the 20 mg dose groups of all strata at month 24. The overall safety results indicated that once-weekly oral ibandronate was well-tolerated at all three doses. CONCLUSION: Once-weekly oral therapy with 20 mg ibandronate provides an effective and safe therapy for the prevention of postmenopausal bone loss.     

Intravenous ibandronate injections in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: one-year results from the dosing intravenous administration study

OBJECTIVE: Although oral bisphosphonates are effective treatments for postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, oral dosing may be unsuitable for some patients. An efficacious intravenously administered bisphosphonate could be beneficial for such patients. Ibandronate, a potent nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate, can be administered using extended dosing intervals, either orally or by rapid intravenous injection. The aim of this study was to identify the optimal intravenous dosing regimen for ibandronate in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, phase III, noninferiority study, we compared 2 regimens of intermittent intravenous injections of ibandronate (2 mg every 2 months and 3 mg every 3 months) with a regimen of 2.5 mg of oral ibandronate daily, the latter of which has proven antifracture efficacy. The study group comprised 1,395 women (ages 55-80 years) who were at least 5 years postmenopausal. All patients had osteoporosis (lumbar spine [L2-L4] bone mineral density [BMD] T score less than -2.5). Participants also received daily calcium (500 mg) and vitamin D (400 IU). The primary end point was change from baseline in lumbar spine BMD at 1 year. Changes in hip BMD and in the level of serum C-telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX) were also measured, as were safety and tolerability. RESULTS: At 1 year, mean lumbar spine BMD increases were as follows: 5.1% among 353 patients receiving 2 mg of ibandronate every 2 months, 4.8% among 365 patients receiving 3 mg of ibandronate every 3 months, and 3.8% among 377 patients receiving 2.5 mg of oral ibandronate daily. Both of the intravenous regimens not only were noninferior, but also were superior (P < 0.001) to the oral regimen. Hip BMD increases (at all sites) were also greater in the groups receiving medication intravenously than in the group receiving ibandronate orally. Robust decreases in the serum CTX level were observed in all arms of the study. Both of the intravenous regimens were well tolerated and did not compromise renal function. CONCLUSION: As assessed by BMD, intravenous injections of ibandronate (2 mg every 2 months or 3 mg every 3 months) are at least as effective as the regimen of 2.5 mg orally daily, which has proven antifracture efficacy, and are well tolerated.     

Intravenous ibandronate injections in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: One‐year results from the dosing intravenous administration study

Objective

Although oral bisphosphonates are effective treatments for postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, oral dosing may be unsuitable for some patients. An efficacious intravenously administered bisphosphonate could be beneficial for such patients. Ibandronate, a potent nitrogen‐containing bisphosphonate, can be administered using extended dosing intervals, either orally or by rapid intravenous injection. The aim of this study was to identify the optimal intravenous dosing regimen for ibandronate in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

Methods

In a randomized, double‐blind, double‐dummy, phase III, noninferiority study, we compared 2 regimens of intermittent intravenous injections of ibandronate (2 mg every 2 months and 3 mg every 3 months) with a regimen of 2.5 mg of oral ibandronate daily, the latter of which has proven antifracture efficacy. The study group comprised 1,395 women (ages 55–80 years) who were at least 5 years postmenopausal. All patients had osteoporosis (lumbar spine [L2−L4] bone mineral density [BMD] T score less than −2.5). Participants also received daily calcium (500 mg) and vitamin D (400 IU). The primary end point was change from baseline in lumbar spine BMD at 1 year. Changes in hip BMD and in the level of serum C‐telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX) were also measured, as were safety and tolerability.

Results

At 1 year, mean lumbar spine BMD increases were as follows: 5.1% among 353 patients receiving 2 mg of ibandronate every 2 months, 4.8% among 365 patients receiving 3 mg of ibandronate every 3 months, and 3.8% among 377 patients receiving 2.5 mg of oral ibandronate daily. Both of the intravenous regimens not only were noninferior, but also were superior (P < 0.001) to the oral regimen. Hip BMD increases (at all sites) were also greater in the groups receiving medication intravenously than in the group receiving ibandronate orally. Robust decreases in the serum CTX level were observed in all arms of the study. Both of the intravenous regimens were well tolerated and did not compromise renal function.

Conclusion

As assessed by BMD, intravenous injections of ibandronate (2 mg every 2 months or 3 mg every 3 months) are at least as effective as the regimen of 2.5 mg orally daily, which has proven antifracture efficacy, and are well tolerated.

     

Soy phytoestrogens do not prevent bone loss in postmenopausal monkeys

The putative skeletal effects of dietary soy phytoestrogens (SPE) were examined in comparison with those of conjugated equine estrogens (CEE; Premarin) in a 3-yr longitudinal study in ovariectomized female monkeys. Controls received alcohol-extracted soy protein with low phytoestrogen content, and treatment groups received either CEE (admixed into the control diet) or unextracted soy protein isolate containing SPE. The acknowledged bone protective effect of CEE was reflected by higher bone mass (by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry) and lower bone turnover marker levels. In contrast, control and SPE groups lost significant lumbar spine bone mineral content and density and whole body bone mineral content within the first year, resulting in reduced bone mass for both groups compared with CEE (P < 0.0005). No effect of SPE was observed for any bone mass measure (P > 0.44), although transient, estrogen-like effects of SPE on serum alkaline phosphatase, calcium, and C-terminal cross-link of type I collagen were observed at 3 months (P < 0.02). These results suggest that SPE may be poor substitutes for mammalian estrogens in protecting against bone loss resulting from estrogen deficiency.     

Quarterly intravenous injection of ibandronate to treat osteoporosis in postmenopausal women

Osteoporosis is a chronic condition that generally requires long-term therapy for fracture risk reduction to become apparent. Although the bisphosphonates have made a major contribution to how clinicians manage osteoporosis, compliance with therapy has generally been less in the real-world setting than seen in clinical trials. Less-frequently administered dosage regimens or nonoral routes may enhance compliance and so maximize the therapeutic benefit of bisphosphonates. Ibandronate is a nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate, whose high potency allows it to be administered orally or intravenously with extended dosing intervals. This paper will review the role of intravenous ibandronate in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.     

Once-monthly oral ibandronate improves biomechanical determinants of bone strength in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis

CONTEXT: Bone strength and fracture resistance are determined by bone mineral density (BMD) and structural, mechanical, and geometric properties of bone. DESIGN, SETTING, AND OBJECTIVES: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled outpatient study evaluated effects of once-monthly oral ibandronate on hip and lumbar spine BMD and calculated strength using quantitative computed tomography (QCT) with finite element analysis (FEA) and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) with hip structural analysis (HSA). PARTICIPANTS: Participants were women aged 55-80 yr with BMD T-scores -2.0 or less to -5.0 or greater (n = 93). INTERVENTION: Oral ibandronate 150 mg/month (n = 47) or placebo (n = 46) was administered for 12 months. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary end point was total hip QCT BMD change from baseline; secondary end points included other QCT BMD sites, FEA, DXA, areal BMD, and HSA. All analyses were exploratory, with post hoc P values. Results: Ibandronate increased integral total hip QCT BMD and DXA areal BMD more than placebo at 12 months (treatment differences: 2.2%, P = 0.005; 2.0%, P = 0.003). FEA-derived hip strength to density ratio and femoral, peripheral, and trabecular strength increased with ibandronate vs. placebo (treatment differences: 4.1%, P < 0.001; 5.9%, P < 0.001; 2.5%, P = 0.011; 3.5%, P = 0.003, respectively). Ibandronate improved vertebral, peripheral, and trabecular strength and anteroposterior bending stiffness vs. placebo [7.1% (P < 0.001), 7.8% (P < 0.001), 5.6% (P = 0.023), and 6.3% (P < 0.001), respectively]. HSA-estimated femoral narrow neck cross-sectional area and moment of inertia and outer diameter increased with ibandronate vs. placebo (respectively 3.6%, P = 0.003; 4.0%, P = 0.052; 2.2%, P = 0.049). CONCLUSIONS: Once-monthly oral Ibandronate for 12 months improved hip and spine BMD measured by QCT and DXA and strength estimated by FEA of QCT scans.     

Impact of bone marker feedback on adherence to once monthly ibandronate for osteoporosis among Asian postmenopausal women

Aim: This study assesses the impact of serum carboxy‐terminal collagen crosslinks (CTX) bone marker feedback (BMF) on adherence to ibandronate treatment in Asian postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Methods: This was a 12‐month (6‐monthly phased), randomized, prospective, open‐label, multi‐center study conducted in 596 (of 628 enrolled) postmenopausal women with osteoporosis (≤ 85 years old) who were naïve, lapsed, or current bisphosphonate users. Patients were randomized into two arms: serum CTX BMF at 3 months versus no‐BMF. Once‐monthly 150 mg ibandronate tablet was administered for 12 months and adherence to therapy was assessed at 6 and 12 months. In addition, patient satisfaction and safety of ibandronate treatment were also assessed. Results: Serum CTX BMF at 3 months showed no impact on adherence. The proportions of adherent patients were comparable in the BMF versus no‐BMF arms (92.6%vs. 96.0%, P = 0.16); overall, serum CTX levels were similar for adherent and non‐adherent patients. However, BMF patients felt more informed about their osteoporosis (P < 0.001) and more satisfied (P < 0.01) than no‐BMF patients. Conclusions: The Asian postmenopausal osteoporosis patients in this study had a high adherence rate to once‐monthly ibandronate therapy. Use of serum CTX BMF had no further impact on increasing adherence, but increased treatment satisfaction.     

Forearm endothelial function and bone mineral loss in postmenopausal women

It is widely believed that the vasculature plays an important role in bone remodeling. We investigated the relationship between forearm endothelial function and bone mass in the lumbar spine in early postmenopausal women without a history of smoking or diabetes mellitus. We studied the forearm resistance artery endothelial function in 110 Japanese women-52 postmenopausal women with normal spinal bone mineral density (BMD), 36 postmenopausal women with osteopenia, and 22 osteoporotic postmenopausal women. Forearm blood flow (FBF) during reactive hyperemia and after sublingual nitroglycerin (NTG) administration was measured by strain-gauge plethysmography. BMD of the lumbar spine (L2-L4) was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. After adjustment for age, body mass index, years since the start of menopause, and basal FBF, women with osteoporosis had a lower maximal FBF response to reactive hyperemia (28.4 +/- 3.8 mL/min per 100 mL tissue) than those with normal BMD (39.8 +/- 2.8 mL/min per 100mL tissue) or osteopenia (35.6 +/- 2.5 mL/min per 100mL tissue) (P = 0.029). A significant increase in serum angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) activity (P = 0.042) and a significant decrease in the serum concentrations of nitrite/nitrate (P = 0.041) were noted in osteoporotic women compared to women with normal BMD or osteopenia. The present findings suggest that postmenopausal women with low BMD, especially those with osteoporosis, have impaired endothelial function in the forearm resistance arteries.     

Torus palatinus: a new anatomical correlation with bone density in postmenopausal women

The observation that subjects who have a striking oral exostosis, called torus palatinus, also tended to have normal or high bone densities prompted us to examine an unselected population referred for bone density assessment for a possible correlation with torus palatinus. Subjects referred from community physicians had a visual examination of the open mouth to estimate the size of any torus palatinus (0 for none/trace to 5 for very large) before undergoing a bone density measurement by dual energy x-ray absortiometry. Bone density T- and z-scores were correlated with the size of each subject's torus palatinus. Torus size groups were also correlated with other variables affecting bone density. About 20% of 370 postmenopausal female subjects, >90% Caucasian, had a moderate to large torus palatinus. Regression correlations for torus size were modest, but significantly related to T- and z-scores of lumbar vertebrae and left hip (P < 0.01 for each). Differences due to medication, body mass index, smoking, parity, and several other factors that affect bone density did not diminish the relation to torus size. This study shows a small, but significant, positive relation for postmenopausal, Caucasian women between bone mineral density and torus size after controlling for several variables known to affect bone density were examined. Torus prominence, in association with other factors, can be considered in decisions for testing bone density in otherwise normal postmenopausal women.     

Hydrochlorothiazide reduces loss of cortical bone in normal postmenopausal women: a randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE: Thiazide diuretics reduce urine calcium excretion and might therefore reduce postmenopausal bone loss. In some, but not all, case-control studies, their use has been associated with a reduced incidence of hip fractures. We studied the effects of hydrochlorothiazide on bone loss in normal postmenopausal women. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We performed a randomized, double-blind, 2-year trial of the effects of hydrochlorothiazide (50 mg per day) and placebo on bone mineral density in normal postmenopausal women. Participants were not required to have either low bone mineral density or hypertension. Bone mineral density was measured using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. RESULTS: One hundred eighty-five women entered the study, of whom 138 completed 2 years of follow-up. In an intention-to-treat analysis, hydrochlorothiazide produced significant benefits on bone mineral density of the total body (between-group difference at 2 years of 0.8%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.3% to 1.3%, P <0.0001), legs (0.9%, 95% CI: 0.2% to 1.7%, P <0.0001), mid-forearm (1.2%, 95% CI: 0.2% to 2.2%, P = 0.02), and ultradistal forearm (1.7%, 95% CI: 0.1% to 3.2%, P = 0.04). There was no effect in the lumbar spine (0.5%, 95% CI: -0.5% to 1.6%) or femoral neck (0.2%, 95% CI: 1.3% to 1.7%). The between-group changes tended to be greatest during the first 6 months, except in the mid-forearm where there appeared to be a progressive divergence. An as-treated analysis produced similar results. Urine calcium excretion and indices of bone turnover decreased in the thiazide group, but parathyroid hormone concentrations did not differ between the groups. Treatment was tolerated well. CONCLUSIONS: Hydrochlorothiazide (50 mg per day) slows cortical bone loss in normal postmenopausal women. It may act directly on bone as well as on the renal tubule. The small size of the effect suggests that thiazides may have a role in the prevention of postmenopausal bone loss, but that they are not an appropriate monotherapy for treating osteoporosis.     

Long-term exercise using weighted vests prevents hip bone loss in postmenopausal women

BACKGROUND: Bone mineral density (BMD) is a primary risk factor for hip fracture. We studied the effect of long-term weighted vest plus jumping exercise on hip BMD in postmenopausal women as a strategy for reducing hip fracture risk. METHODS: Eighteen postmenopausal women (age = 64.1 +/- 1.6 years at baseline, 69.9 +/- 1.6 years at post-testing) who had participated in a 9-month exercise intervention volunteered for the long-term trial. Nine of the original group engaged in weighted vest plus jumping exercise three times per week for 32 weeks of the year over a period of 5 years. Nine of the original controls were active but not enrolled in the exercise program. BMD of the proximal femur was assessed by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry at baseline and after 5 years. RESULTS: At baseline, groups were similar for age, weight, height, years past menopause, and BMD of the femoral neck, trochanter, and total hip. At follow-up, differences in BMD at all regions of the hip were higher in exercisers than controls. For exercisers, changes in BMD were + 1.54% +/- 2.37%, -0.24% +/- 1.02%, and -0.82% +/- 1.04% (means + SE) at the femoral neck, trochanter, and total hip, respectively; controls decreased at all sites (-4.43% +/- 0.93%. 3.43% +/- 1.09%, and -3.80% +/- 1.03%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: A 5-year program of weighted vest plus jumping exercise maintains hip BMD by preventing significant bone loss in older postmenopausal women. Furthermore, this particular program appears to promote long-term adherence and compliance, as evidenced by the commitment of the exercisers for more than 5 years.     

Efficacy and tolerability of intravenous ibandronate injections in postmenopausal osteoporosis: 2-year results from the DIVA study

OBJECTIVE: An effective and well tolerated intravenous (IV) bisphosphonate could provide a new treatment method for patients with osteoporosis. The Dosing IntraVenous Administration (DIVA) study was designed to identify the optimal ibandronate IV injection schedule for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis by comparing the efficacy and tolerability of 2- and 3-monthly injections with the previously evaluated daily oral ibandronate regimen. We report the effects on lumbar spine and proximal femur bone mineral density (BMD) and bone resorption markers over 2 years. METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, noninferiority study recruited 1395 women (aged 55-80 yrs; > or = 5 yrs since menopause) with osteoporosis [mean lumbar spine (L2-L4) BMD T-score < -2.5 and > or = -5.0]. Patients received IV ibandronate (2 mg every 2 mo or 3 mg every 3 mo) plus daily oral placebo, or 2.5 mg daily oral ibandronate plus 2- or 3-monthly IV placebo. Supplemental vitamin D (400 IU) and calcium (500 mg) were provided throughout the 2-year study. RESULTS: At 2 years, the 2- and 3-monthly IV regimens achieved statistically noninferior and also superior increases in lumbar spine BMD compared with the daily regimen (6.4% and 6.3% vs 4.8%, respectively; p < 0.001). Greater increases were also obtained with IV ibandronate versus daily in proximal femur BMD. Serum concentrations of the biochemical marker of bone resorption C-telopeptide of the alpha-chain of type I collagen were reduced to a similar extent in all treatment arms (53.4%-59.9%). The tolerability profile of the IV regimens was similar to that observed with daily oral therapy. CONCLUSION: Ibandronate IV injections are an effective and well tolerated treatment for postmenopausal osteoporosis and provide a useful alternative to oral dosing.     

Effect of estrogens and calcium carbonate on bone loss in postmenopausal women.

Sixty postmenopausal women were placed in three groups--control, sex hormone-treated, and CaCO3-treated--and followed for 2 years. Skeletal mass decreased by 1.18%/year in the control group, 0.15%/year in the hormone group, and 0.22%/year in the CaCO3 group by radiogrammetry; and 2.88%/year in the control group, 0.73%/year in the hormone group, and 1.83%/year in the CaCO3 group by photon absorptiometry. The treatment groups differed significantly from the control group except for photon absorptiometry in the CaCO3 group. Bone accretion and resorption decreased in the treatment groups as measured by calcium tracer kinetics, resorption more so than accretion. We conclude that [1] these techniques are sufficiently sensitive to detect age-related bone loss; [2] postmenopausal sex-hormone replacement measurably decreases age-related bone loss by suppressing bone turnover, resorption more than accretion; and [3] calcium supplements produce the same effect but at the dose we used were slightly less effective.     

Decision rules for selecting women for bone mineral density testing: application in postmenopausal women referred to a bone densitometry unit

OBJECTIVE: Although several decision rules have been developed to identify postmenopausal women who may be selected for dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry measurements, information on their utility in a clinical setting is scarce. We evaluated the utility of 4 previously validated decision rules in a large group of Spanish postmenopausal women referred to a bone densitometry unit. METHODS: We reviewed the data on 665 postmenopausal women (mean age 54.2 +/- 5.4 yrs). We selected the 4 decision rules that could be applied with the information that was available: the Osteoporosis Risk Assessment Instrument (ORAI), Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool (OST), Osteoporosis Index of Risk (OSIRIS), and Body Weight Criterion (BWC). The sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of each decision rule were determined. RESULTS: The ORAI would recommend 45% of women for bone mineral density (BMD) testing, OST 46%, OSIRIS 37%, and BWC 70%. Sensitivity values obtained in the overall series were 64.1% for the ORAI, 69.2% for OST, 58.1% for OSIRIS, and 83.8% for BWC. The sensitivity increased progressively with age. The negative predictive value in the overall series was 88.5% for ORAI, 89.9% for OST, 88.4% for OSIRIS, and 90.6% for BWC. CONCLUSION: In a complementary way with previous studies in older women, where decision rules were valuable to identify the majority of women likely to have osteoporosis, our data indicate that in younger postmenopausal women, decision rules are useful as a screening method to rule out the presence of osteoporosis and the need for BMD scanning.     

Longitudinal bone loss in postmenopausal women with primary biliary cirrhosis and well-preserved liver function

Abstract. Ormarsdóttir S, Ljunggren Ö, Mallmin H, Olsson R, Prytz H, Lööf L (University Hospital, Uppsala; Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg; University Hospital, Lund; and Central Hospital, Västerås, Sweden). Longitudinal bone loss in postmenopausal women with primary biliary cirrhosis and well‐preserved liver function. J Intern Med 2002; 252: 537–541. Objectives/design. Increased rate of bone loss has been reported in women with primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) and varying degree of liver dysfunction. Whether bone loss is increased in patients without liver dysfunction is unclear. The aim of this study was to estimate retrospectively the rate of bone loss in postmenopausal women with PBC and well‐preserved liver function. Subjects/interventions. Forty‐three women with PBC, and classified as Child‐Pugh class A, were included. Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by dual energy X‐ray absorptiometry at the lumbar spine and the femoral neck. Results. Median time between measurements of BMD was 26 months (range, 12–48 months). Twenty women were not receiving any bone protective treatment, i.e. hormone replacement therapy (HRT), bisphosphonates or vitamin D/calcium supplementation, whilst 23 women received such treatment. Mean annual bone loss in the former group was 0.38 ± 2.56% and 0.42 ± 2.29% at the lumbar spine and the femoral neck, respectively. Women receiving treatment, however, increased their BMD by 1.92 ± 3.76% and 0.15 ± 2.75% at the lumbar spine and the femoral neck, respectively. At the lumbar spine the difference with regard to changes in BMD between untreated and treated women was statistically significant (P = 0.02). Women who received HRT (n = 11) increased their BMD at the lumbar spine by 2.95 ± 3.91%, P = 0.03 when compared with untreated women. Conclusion. Bone loss in postmenopausal women with PBC and well‐preserved liver function is not increased above normal. Treatment with bone protective treatment, mainly HRT, improves BMD at the lumbar spine.