High dose, external beam and intraoperative radiotherapy in the treatment of resectable and unresectable pancreatic cancer

Ninety patients with pancreatic cancer were treated by external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and/or intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) with or without surgical resection of the tumor, and the results were compared with those of a historical control comprising 112 patients treated by surgery alone. At an early stage of this study, postoperative EBRT (50-60 Gy) or IORT (25-33 Gy) was given alone, but recently the two modalities have been combined. The combination of high doses of EBRT and IORT was well tolerated provided that the gastrointestinal tract was not irradiated during IORT. Although EBRT plus IORT appeared to yield better results than either EBRT or IORT alone, the difference was not significant on multivariate analysis, and patients receiving EBRT, IORT, or EBRT + IORT were grouped together. Patients receiving radiotherapy in addition to macroscopically curative surgery had a slightly longer median survival time (14 months) than those receiving curative surgery alone (10 months), but the 3-year survival rate was similar (21% vs. 19%). In patients who underwent noncurative resection, the median survival time was significantly longer for the irradiated group (12 months) than for the control group (6.5 months). Also, in patients with unresectable lesions but no distant metastases, irradiation prolonged the median survival time significantly (8 vs. 3.5 months). In this group, there was one 5-year survivor, who received EBRT of 55 Gy plus IORT of 30 Gy to his unresectable pancreatic body lesion. Patients with metastases were also treated for palliation of symptoms, but it was found that irradiation prolonged the median survival time even in such cases (4.5 vs. 2.5 months). Based on these results, we plan to use EBRT plus IORT in all pancreatic cancer patients with no metastases.     

Definitive radiotherapy for patients with isolated vaginal recurrence of endometrial carcinoma after hysterectomy

PURPOSE: To determine the outcome of patients after radical radiotherapy (RT) for isolated vaginal recurrence of endometrial carcinoma and to determine the clinical and pathologic predictors of outcome. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We reviewed the records of 91 patients treated at our institution between 1960 and 1997 with radical RT for vaginal recurrence after definitive surgery for endometrial carcinoma. Thirty-one percent of the patients received external beam RT (EBRT) alone, 12% received brachytherapy alone, and 57% received a combination. The median dose of radiation was 75 Gy (range 34-122). All end points were measured from the time of the first recurrence. The median duration of follow-up after recurrence was 58 months (range 1-289). RESULTS: The 2- and 5-year local control (LC) rate and overall survival rate was 82% and 75% and 69% and 43%, respectively. The median time from initial diagnosis of endometrial cancer to death from disease was 38 months. On univariate analysis, a dose to the relapse site of > or =80 Gy and EBRT plus brachytherapy vs. single-modality therapy were significant predictors of improved LC. On multivariate analysis, only the type of treatment correlated significantly with LC (p = 0.03). On univariate analysis, Grade 1 or 2 vs. Grade 3 tumor and EBRT plus brachytherapy vs. single-modality therapy were significant predictors of improved overall survival. CONCLUSION: RT provides excellent LC of isolated vaginal recurrences of endometrial carcinoma, particularly when high doses are given using a combination of EBRT and brachytherapy. However, distant metastases frequently develop despite local disease control, contributing to a 5-year overall survival rate of <50%. For patients who have an isolated vaginal recurrence, the time from initial diagnosis of endometrial cancer to death from disease is usually >3 years. For this reason, in studies of adjuvant RT, long-term follow-up is required to permit evaluation of the impact of treatment on survival.     

Retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma: an analysis of radiation and surgical treatment

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients with localized retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma (STS) treated with complete surgical resection and radiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The medical records of 83 patients were reviewed retrospectively. Sixty patients presented with primary disease and the remaining 23 had recurrence after previous surgical resection. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 47 months, the actuarial overall disease-specific survival (DSS), distant metastasis-free survival, and local control (LC) rates were 44%, 67%, and 40%, respectively. Of the 38 patients dying of disease, local disease progression was the sole site of recurrence for 16 patients and was a component of progression for another 11 patients. Multivariate analysis indicated that histologic grade was associated with the 5-year rates of DSS (low-grade, 92%; intermediate-grade, 51%; and high-grade, 41%, p = 0.006). Multivariate analysis also indicated an inferior 5-year LC rate for patients presenting with recurrent disease, positive or uncertain resection margins, and age greater than 65 years. The data did not suggest an improved local control with higher doses of external-beam radiation (EBRT) or with the specific use of intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT). Radiation-related complications (10% at 5 years) developed in 5 patients; all had received their EBRT postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Although preoperative radiation therapy and aggressive surgical resection is well tolerated in patients, local disease progression continues to be a significant component of disease death. In this small cohort of patients, the use of higher doses of EBRT or IORT did not result in clinically apparent improvements in outcomes.     

软组织肉瘤手术加术中放疗的临床研究

目的:探讨软组织肉瘤术中放疗的意义。方法:对39例软组织肉瘤患者行根治或姑息性手术,术中放疗在术中放疗手术室进行,术中根据肿瘤大小,选择不同术中放疗限光筒及6～12MeV电子线1次照射15～25Gy,姑息手术者剂量加大至36Gy。术后辅以外照射治疗,常规设野,5/周,2Gy/次,总量40～50Gy。初发病灶10例,术后复发29例。结果:39例患者随访12～64个月,3、5年局控率分别为71.8%和64.1%。3年生存率为82.0%。结论:术中放疗具有较高的局控率,比之其他治疗具有许多优点,将获得较高的生存率。     

Analysis of the clinical benefit of intraoperative radiotherapy in patients undergoing macroscopically curative resection for pancreatic cancer

PURPOSE: To determine the survival of pancreatic cancer patients treated with intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) and/or external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) following macroscopically curative resection. METHODS AND MATERIALS: One hundred and thirty-eight patients with pancreatic cancer who had undergone potentially curative total or regional pancreatectomy between 1980 and 1997 were retrospectively analyzed. Among the 138 patients, 98 had a pathologically negative surgical margin and the remaining 40 patients had a positive surgical margin. The usual EBRT dose was 45-55 Gy with a daily fraction of 1.5-2.0 Gy. The median IORT dose was 25 Gy in a single fraction. RESULTS: The 2-year cause-specific survival rate of patients with pathologically negative surgical margins was 19%, and that of patients with positive margins was 4% (p < 0.005). Although the median survival time (MST) of patients with negative margins treated with IORT and EBRT was significantly longer than that of those treated with operation alone (17 vs. 11 months), no significant difference in survival curves was observed. In patients with positive surgical margins in peripancreatic soft tissue, the difference between the survival curve of patients treated with surgery alone and that of those treated with surgery and radiation therapy was borderline significant (p < 0.10). Patients receiving intraarterial or intraportal infusion chemotherapy had significantly improved survival rates compared with those who did not receive it (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Although the MST was longer in patients with negative margins receiving IORT and EBRT than in those receiving no radiation, improved long-term survival by IORT and/or EBRT was not suggested. In patients with positive margins, our results obtained by IORT/EBRT were encouraging. Randomized studies with much higher patient numbers are necessary to define the role of IORT in curatively resected pancreatic cancer.     

Intraoperative radiation therapy in recurrent ovarian cancer

PURPOSE: To evaluate disease outcomes and complications in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer treated with cytoreductive surgery and intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: A retrospective study of 24 consecutive patients with ovarian carcinoma who underwent secondary cytoreduction and intraoperative radiation therapy at our institution between 1994 and 2002 was conducted. After optimal cytoreductive surgery, IORT was delivered with orthovoltage X-rays (200 kVp) using individually sized and beveled cone applications. Outcomes measures were local control of disease, progression-free interval, overall survival, and treatment-related complications. RESULTS: Of these 24 patients, 22 were available for follow-up analysis. Additional treatment at the time of and after IORT included whole abdominopelvic radiation, 9; pelvic or locoregional radiation, 5; chemotherapy, 6; and no adjuvant treatment, 2. IORT doses ranged from 9-14 Gy (median, 12 Gy). The anatomic sites treated were pelvis (sidewalls, vaginal cuff, presacral area, anterior pubis), para-aortic and paracaval lymph node beds, inguinal region, or porta hepatitis. At a median follow-up of 24 months, 5 patients remain free of disease, whereas 17 patients have recurred, of whom 4 are alive with disease and 13 died from disease. Five patients recurred within the radiation fields for a locoregional relapse rate of 32% and 12 patients recurred at distant sites with a median time to recurrence of 13.7 months. Five-year overall survival was 22% with a median survival of 26 months from time of IORT. Nine patients (41%) experienced Grade 3 toxicities from their treatments. CONCLUSION: In carefully selected patients with locally recurrent ovarian cancer, combined IORT and tumor reductive surgery is reasonably tolerated and may contribute to achieving local control and disease palliation.     

Moderate dose intraoperative and external beam radiotherapy for locally recurrent rectal carcinoma.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Late adverse effects (i.e. neuropathy, chronic bowel obstruction) limit the effective dose given in intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). Initial results of a multi-modality treatment approach using moderate dose IORT and moderate dose EBRT are presented. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-one consecutive patients with recurrent rectal carcinomas had IORT and EBRT after complete (R0, n = 14) or incomplete resection (R1, n = 9; R2, n = 8). The mean [ORT dose was 13.7 Gy (range 12-20 Gy) supplemented with an EBRT dose of 41.4 Gy. Twenty-two patients had preoperative EBRT and 22 patients had concomitant chemotherapy (5-FU, Leucovorine). RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 28 months, 16 patients had re-recurrent disease and 11 patients had died. Nine patients failed locally (four in-field, four marginal and one anastomotic re-recurrence), three combined with distant metastasis, resulting in overall and IORT infield local control rates of 71% and 87%, respectively. Distant metastases alone were found in seven patients. The 4-year overall and relapse-free survival rates were 58% and 48%, respectively. After incomplete resection the local failure rate increased (R0 21%, R1/2 35%) and the 4-year relapse-free survival rate decreased significantly (29% versus 71%) due to a markedly increased distant metastasis rate (53% versus 7%). Acute and late toxicities were not increased. CONCLUSION: The combination of moderate dose IORT and EBRT is a safe and efficacious component in a multi-modality treatment approach.     

Surgical management of retroperitoneal sarcomas associated with external and intraoperative electron beam radiotherapy.

AIMS: To report outcomes of adults with retroperitoneal sarcoma (RS) treated by surgery, external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and intraoperative electron beam radiotherapy (IORT). METHODS: From July 1988 to February 2001; 24 patients with primary and recurrent RS were diagnosed and treated. The median dose and energy of IORT delivered was 15 Gy/9meV. EBRT dose varies between 45-50 Gy. RESULTS: There were five primary and 19 recurrent tumours. One primary and five recurrent tumours underwent R0 resection. There were 12 liposarcomas and 19 grade I tumours; 13 patients developed local recurrence and three developed distant metastases.Twenty-two patients received IORT associated with EBRT: 11 developed recurrences. Six patients developed Neurotoxicity (4 grade II and 2 grade III). Disease free survival and overall survival at 5 years was 28 and 56% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: EBRT with IORT treatment is a promising technique for local control. Lower recurrence rates are associated with radical (R0) surgical procedures.     

Intra-operative irradiation (IORT) for primary advanced and recurrent rectal cancer. a need for randomised studies

The aim of this study was to determine the impact of intra-operative irradiation (IORT) combined with pre-operative external beam irradiation (EBRT) and surgical resection in patients with locally advanced primary or recurrent rectal cancer. 64 patients with locally advanced primary cancer and 104 with recurrence had EBRT (46-50 Gy) before surgery. 80 patients received IORT (median dose 15 Gy energy 12 MeV). 80 patients had R0 resections, 47 R1 and 41 R2 resections. More R1 resections were performed in the IORT group, more R0 and R2 resections in the non-IORT group. Median follow-up was around 22 months. 146 patients were resected, 22 had exploratory laparotomy. The cumulative overall survival was similar for both the IORT and non-IORT groups. 5-year survival for primary cancers was 48% versus 28% for recurrences. No R2 resections survived 3.5 years. 5-year-survival for R0 resections was nearly 60% and around 30% for R1 resections. The survival curves of the patients given and not given IORT treatment was not statistically different when R0, R1 and R2 resections were analysed separately. IORT did not seem to influence the local recurrence rate when R0 and R1 resections were analysed separately or in a multivariate analysis. The IORT and non-IORT groups were not identical with regard to type of cancer and R-stage. Still the lack of an identifiable impact of IORT suggests that there is a need for randomised studies of the IORT effect.     

Chemoradiation with or without intraoperative radiation therapy in patients with locally recurrent rectal carcinoma: prognostic factors and long term outcome

BACKGROUND: Rectal carcinoma patients with local recurrence are reported to have a dismal prognosis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of combined modality therapy on clinical outcome and to determine the prognostic impact of a "presurgical" staging system. METHODS: Between September 1989 and June 1997, 47 patients (with a median follow-up of 80 months) with locally recurrent, nonmetastatic rectal carcinoma were classified according to the extent of pelvic sidewall involvement as determined by pretreatment computed tomography (CT) scan. They received preoperative external beam radiation (45-47 grays [Gy] in 34 patients; 23.4 Gy in 13 preirradiated patients) plus concomitant 5-fluorouracil (1000 mg/m(2)/day as a 96-hour continuous infusion on Days 1-4 + 29-32) and mitomycin C (10 mg/m(2) as a bolus intravenously on Day 1 + 29). After 4-6 weeks, the patients were evaluated for surgical resection and intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) procedure (10-15 Gy) or, in unresectable patients, a boost dose was planned by chemoradiation (23.4 Gy) or brachytherapy. Thereafter, adjuvant chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil and leucovorin for a total of six to nine courses) was prescribed. RESULTS: During chemoradiation, 2 patients (4.3%) developed Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Grade 3-4 acute toxicity. Twenty-five patients (53. 2%) had an objective response after chemoradiation. Twenty-one patients (45%) underwent radical surgical resection. The overall 5-year survival and local control rates were 22% and 32%, respectively. The classification system significantly predicted survival (P = 0.008). Radically resected patients had better local control and survival (P < 0.0001); in patients treated with IORT, the 5-year local control and survival rates were 79% and 41%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The data from the current study suggest that combined modality therapy was well tolerated and improved resectability, local control, and survival. The classification system appears to be a reliable tool with which to predict clinical outcome in patients with locally recurrent rectal carcinoma.     

High-dose-rate intraoperative brachytherapy for recurrent colorectal cancer

PURPOSE: Management of locally recurrent colorectal adenocarcinoma represents a significant challenge. Many of these tumors adhere to or invade into vital pelvic structures rendering surgery or external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) as palliative treatment. Therefore, a treatment approach was developed to evaluate the role of high-dose-rate intraoperative brachytherapy (HDR-IORT) and surgery as a component of therapy in the management of locally recurrent colorectal cancer. This is an update of our preliminary report with longer follow-up and larger patient numbers. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between January 1992 and September 1998, 74 patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer were treated with surgery and HDR-IORT. Additional EBRT was given to 29 patients, and 33 patients received 5-fluorouracil based chemotherapy. All patients underwent complete gross resection, and 21 of 74 had positive microscopic margin. The dose of HDR-IORT ranged from 10 to 18 Gy. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 22 months, the 5-year local control, distant metastasis disease-free, disease-free, and overall survival rates were 39%, 39%, 23%, and 23%, respectively. The only predictor of improved local control was a negative margin of resection with a 5-year local control rate of 43%, compared to 26% in those with positive margin (p = 0.02). For overall survival, a negative microscopic margin (p = 0.04) and the use of IORT + EBRT (p = 0.04) were significant predictors of improved survival. The incidence of peripheral neuropathy was 16%. CONCLUSION: The results with HDR-IORT in this group of patients are encouraging. Further improvements in local and distant control are still needed.     

Interim report of image-guided conformal high-dose-rate brachytherapy for patients with unfavorable prostate cancer: the William Beaumont phase II dose-escalating trial

PURPOSE: We analyzed our institution's experience treating patients with unfavorable prostate cancer in a prospective Phase II dose-escalating trial of external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) integrated with conformal high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy boosts. This interim report discusses treatment outcome and prognostic factors using this treatment approach. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From November 1991 through February 1998, 142 patients with unfavorable prostate cancer were prospectively treated in a dose-escalating trial with pelvic EBRT in combination with outpatient HDR brachytherapy at William Beaumont Hospital. Patients with any of the following characteristics were eligible: pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) >/= 10.0 ng/ml, Gleason score >/= 7, or clinical stage T2b or higher. All patients received pelvic EBRT to a median total dose of 46.0 Gy. Pelvic EBRT was integrated with ultrasound-guided transperineal conformal interstitial iridium-192 HDR implants. From 1991 to 1995, 58 patients underwent three conformal interstitial HDR implants during the first, second, and third weeks of pelvic EBRT. After October 1995, 84 patients received two interstitial implants during the first and third weeks of pelvic EBRT. The dose delivered via interstitial brachytherapy was escalated from 5.50 Gy to 6.50 Gy for each implant in those patients receiving three implants, and subsequently, from 8.25 Gy to 9.50 Gy per fraction in those patients receiving two implants. To improve implant quality and reduce operator dependency, an on-line, image-guided interactive dose optimization program was utilized during each HDR implant. No patient received hormonal therapy unless treatment failure was documented. The median follow-up was 2.1 years (range: 0.2-7.2 years). Biochemical failure was defined according to the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology Consensus Panel definition. RESULTS: The pretreatment PSA level was >/= 10.0 ng/ml in 51% of patients. The biopsy Gleason score was >/= 7 in 58% of cases, and 75% of cases were clinical stage T2b or higher. Despite the high frequency of these poor prognostic factors, the actuarial biochemical control rate was 89% at 2 years and 63% at 5 years. On multivariate analysis, a higher pretreatment PSA level, higher Gleason score, higher PSA nadir level, and shorter time to nadir were associated with biochemical failure. In the entire population, 14 patients (10%) experienced clinical failure at a median interval of 1.7 years (range: 0.2-4.5 years) after completing RT. The 5-year actuarial clinical failure rate was 22%. The 5-year actuarial rates of local failure and distant metastasis were 16% and 14%, respectively. For all patients, the 5-year disease-free survival, overall survival, and cause-specific survival rates were 89%, 95%, and 96%, respectively. The 5-year actuarial rate of RTOG Grade 3 late complications was 9% with no patient experiencing Grade 4 or 5 acute or late toxicity. CONCLUSION: Pelvic EBRT in combination with image-guided conformal HDR brachytherapy boosts appears to be an effective treatment for patients with unfavorable prostate cancer with minimal associated morbidity. Our dose-escalating trial will continue.     

Postoperative radiotherapy in carcinoma of the cervix with microscopically positive resection margin

Background Patients with cervical cancer who have positive surgical resection margins after radical hysterectomy are at increased risk for local recurrence. The results of postoperative pelvic radiotherapy for cervix cancer with microscopically positive surgical resection margins were analyzed to evaluate the role of radiotherapy. Methods Between 1979 and 1992, 60 patients with cervix carcinoma were treated with postoperative radiotherapy after radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy because of microscopic positive vaginal (48 patients), or parametrial (12 patients) resection margins. Patients were treated with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) alone (12 patients), or EBRT plus vaginal ovoid irradiation (VOI) (48 patients). The median follow-up period was 55 months. Results The 5-year actuarial disease-free and overall survival rates for all patients were 75% and 84%, respectively. The overall recurrence rate was 23% (14/60). Among the 48 patients with positive vaginal resection margins, 4 had pelvic recurrence (8%), and 7 had distant metastasis (15%); the recurrence rate was 21% (9/43) in those treated with EBRT and VOI, and 40% (2/5) in the EBRT-only treated group. In the 12 patients with positive parametrial margins, 3 patients (25%) had distant metastases. The most significant prognostic factor was lymph node metastasis. Complications resulting from radiotherapy occurred at a rate of 32% (19/60), and grade III complications occurred in 3 patients (5%). Conclusion Postoperative radiotherapy can produce excellent control rates in patients with microscopically positive resection margins. In patients with positive vaginal margins, whole pelvic EBRT and VOI is recommended.     

Intraoperative electron beam radiotherapy in recurrent colorectal carcinoma.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The installation of a dedicated linear accelerator in a shielded operating room in 1992 allowed us to start a feasibility study of intraoperative electron beam radiation therapy (IOERT) in colorectal carcinoma. METHODS: From March 1992 to February 1996, 28 patients with recurrent colorectal carcinoma were treated with maximal surgical resection and IOERT to the pelvis (n = 20) or paraortics (n = 8). IOERT dose ranged from 10 to 20 Gy with electron energies of 6-15 MeV. Postoperative external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) of 45-50 Gy was planned for the previously unirradiated patients. RESULTS: IOERT was well tolerated, but 10 (70%) of 13 patients in the previously unirradiated group did not complete the EBRT per protocol. Eight patients (29%) had some morbidity including surgically related fistula distal from IOERT sites. Two patients developed pelvic pain, which can be attributed to IOERT. Three-year local control at sites treated with IOERT was 40% (53% for previously irradiated patients and 27% for previously unirradiated patients). The 3-year actuarial overall survival was 12% (17% for previously irradiated patients and 8% for previously unirradiated patients). CONCLUSIONS: Our initial experience showed that it was feasible to treat poor prognostic colorectal cancer patients with IOERT. The morbidity observed was mainly related to extensive surgery in high-risk patients. Poor local control was obtained in patients treated with low-dose IOERT alone. Hence, previously unirradiated patients are encouraged to complete the planned EBRT or, alternatively, are considered for EBRT preoperatively or are given a higher IOERT dose (up to 20 Gy) if EBRT will not be given. Since IORT doses >20 Gy are associated with nerve toxicity, we currently add limited dose EBRT in the previously irradiated group. Patients with disease located in multiple abdominal sites are no longer considered candidates for IOERT.     

A study of radiotherapy modalities combined with continuous 5-FU infusion for locally advanced gastrointestinal malignancies.

AIM: We describe the feasibility of combining infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) with intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT). METHODS: Patients with surgically resectable locally advanced gastrointestinal cancers were treated concurrently during surgery with IORT and a 72 h infusion of 5-FU. Patients without previous external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) were subsequently treated with EBRT (40-50Gy) concurrent with a 21-day continuous infusion of 5-FU. Pancreatic, gastric, duodenal, ampullary, recurrent colorectal, and recurrent anal cancer were included. RESULTS: During IORT/5-FU, no chemotherapy-related grade III or IV hematologic or gastrointestinal toxicity was noted. Post-surgical recovery or wound healing was not affected. One of nine patients who received post-operative radiation required a treatment break. During follow-up, there were more complications in patients with pelvic tumours, especially those with previous radiation. Nine patients have had local and/or local regional recurrences, two of these in the IORT field. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with a combination of IORT and 5-FU followed by EBRT and 5-FU is feasible. However, long-term complications may be increased in previously irradiated recurrent pelvic tumours.     

Treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer with external beam radiation, surgical resection, and intraoperative radiation therapy

To try to improve the local control and survival of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer we have used a combination of high-dose pre-operative radiation therapy to 5,040 cGy followed by surgical resection and intraoperative electron beam radiation therapy (IORT) when there was visible or palpable residual disease, microscopically positive surgical margins, or persisting tumor adherence. A total of 75 patients were taken to surgery for resection +/- IORT who did not have distant metastases. Of the 49 patients with primary tumors, 11 did not have IORT as the tumor was thought to be completely resected. Of these 11, there were two local recurrences and a 3-year survival of 71%. Thirty-six patients with primary tumors had resection (20 complete, 16 partial) plus IORT, with a 3-year survival of 58% and three local failures. Twenty-six additional patients were treated for locally advanced recurrence of whom four could not receive IORT because of pelvic size or the extent of tumor. Of the 22 who received IORT, 7/9 with complete resection, 2/8 with partial resection, and 1/5 with no resection had local control with an overall 3-year actuarial survival of 32%. The local control and survival results in the primary tumors appear favorable compared to other series in the literature and suggest benefit to the use of IORT. For patients treated for local recurrence, local control and long-term survival can be obtained, but the results are not as encouraging as for the primary tumors.     

Adjuvant external beam radiation therapy with concurrent chemotherapy in the management of gallbladder carcinoma.

PURPOSE: This study was performed to evaluate the outcome of patients with gallbladder cancer who received postoperative concurrent chemotherapy and radiation therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Curative resection followed by adjuvant combined modality therapy with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and chemotherapy was attempted in 21 consecutive gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) patients at the Mayo Clinic from 1985 through 1997. All patients received concurrent 5-fluorouracil during EBRT. EBRT fields encompassed the tumor bed and regional lymph nodes (median dose of 54 Gy in 1.8-2.0-Gy fractions). One patient received 15 Gy intraoperatively after EBRT. A retrospective analysis was performed for the end points of local control, distant failure, and overall survival. RESULTS: After maximal resection, 12 patients had no residual disease on pathologic evaluation, 5 had microscopic residual disease, and 4 had gross residual disease. One patient had Stage I disease, and 20 had Stage III-IV disease. With median follow-up of 5 years (range: 2.6-11.5 years), 5-year survival for the entire cohort was 33%. The 5-year survival rate of patients with Stage I-III disease was 65% vs. 0% for those with Stage IV disease (p < 0.02). For patients with no residual disease, 5-year survival was 64% vs. 0% for those with residual disease (p = 0.002). The median survival was 0.6, 1.4, and 5.1 years for patients with gross residual, microscopic residual, and no residual disease, respectively (p = 0.02). The 5-year local control rate for the entire cohort was 73%. Two-year local control rates were 0%, 80%, and 88% for patients with gross residual, microscopic residual, or no residual disease, respectively (p < 0.01). Five-year local control rates were 100% for the 6 patients who received total EBRT doses >54 Gy (microscopic residual, 3 patients; gross residual, 1 patient; negative but narrow margins, 2 patients) vs. 65% for the 15 who received a lower dose (3, gross residual; 2, microresidual; 10, negative margins). CONCLUSION: Patients with completely resected (negative margins) GBC followed by adjuvant EBRT plus 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy had a relatively favorable prognosis, with a 5-year survival rate of 64%. These results seem to be superior to historical surgical controls from the Mayo Clinic and other institutions, which report 5-year survival rates of approximately 33% with complete resection alone. Both tumor stage and extent of resection seemed to influence survival and local control. More aggressive measures using current cancer therapies and integration of new cancer treatment modalities will be required to favorably impact on the poor prognosis of patients with Stage IV or subtotally resected GBC. Additional investigation leading to earlier diagnosis is warranted, because most patients with GBC present with advanced disease.     

Retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcomas: A pilot study of intraoperative radiation therapy

This pilot study was conducted to evaluate the feasibility and tolerance of a multimodal therapy of retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma (STS), including intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT). Nineteen patients (14 primarily treated patients and 5 treated for a recurrent tumor) were included. Surgery included a complete resection (14), a partial resection (2), and no resection (2). The median IORT dose was 17 Gy. Thirteen patients also received an external radiation therapy (ERT). Nine patients received chemotherapy. There was no postoperative mortality. Immediate postoperative complications occurred in four patients (21%). Delayed complications occurred in six patients, including one lethal iliac artery disruption. With a median follow-up of 17 months, the 2-year disease-free survival rate was 60%, and the 2-year actuarial local control rate was 76%. A multimodality approach of treatment, including IORT and ERT and eventually chemotherapy, appears feasible in patients with retroperitoneal STS. However, the treatment-related morbidity appeared relatively high in this study. © 1996 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Intraoperative radiation therapy for recurrent head-and-neck cancer: the UCSF experience

PURPOSE: To review a single-institutional experience with the use of intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) for recurrent head-and-neck cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1991 and 2004, 137 patients were treated with gross total resection and IORT for recurrence or persistence of locoregional cancer of the head and neck. One hundred and thirteen patients (83%) had previously received external beam radiation as a component of definitive therapy. Ninety-four patients (69%) had squamous cell histology. Final surgical margins were microscopically positive in 56 patients (41%). IORT was delivered using either a modified linear accelerator or a mobile electron unit and was administered as a single fraction to a median dose of 15 Gy (range, 10-18 Gy). Median follow-up among surviving patients was 41 months (range, 3-122 months). RESULTS: The 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year estimates of in-field control after salvage surgery and IORT were 70%, 64%, and 61%, respectively. Positive margins at the time of IORT predicted for in-field failure (p = 0.001). The 3-year rates of locoregional control, distant metastasis-free survival, and overall survival were 51%, 46%, and 36%, respectively. There were no perioperative fatalities. Complications included wound infection (4 patients), orocutaneous fistula (2 patients), flap necrosis (1 patient), trismus (1 patient), and neuropathy (1 patient). CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative RT results in effective disease control with acceptable toxicity and should be considered for selected patients with recurrent or persistent cancers of the head and neck.     

Future directions in intraoperative radiation therapy

It is difficult to establish the degree of effectiveness of IORT as a component of treatment in some of the malignancies currently being treated by IORT. Locally advanced pancreatic cancer is a typical example of a neoplasm for which it has been challenging to find effective advances in treatment. The survival time of patients who have this disease is limited to 9 to 12 months (median), with a 2-year survival rate of 10% to 20% following even the most effective chemoradiation. It is perhaps overly optimistic to expect that IORT will significantly enhance survival, because currently available systemic treatment options have not meaningfully affected either overall patient survival times or the rate of distant metastasis in either the adjuvant setting or for metastatic disease. It is encouraging, however, that Willett has reported five patients with 5-year survival times in the Massachusetts General Hospital IOERT series for unresectable pancreatic cancer (C.G. Willett, personal communication, 2002). Also encouraging is the report from the Medical College of Ohio of a 5-year rate of 33% in a small group of patients with resectable pancreatic cancers treated with single IORT doses (without EBRT or chemotherapy) as the sole adjuvant to surgical resection. At the same institution, during the same time period, the same group of surgeons observed that no patient with resectable pancreatic cancer survived longer than 13 months following surgical resection alone [7]. Exciting possibilities involve the use of IORT when treating early-stage malignant disease, as is detailed in the chapter on breast cancer. The use of [table: see text] IORT as adjuvant therapy seems to be associated with an extremely low incidence of in-breast local recurrence. Whether this is because of early stage of the disease or the adjuvant EBRT is not entirely clear at the time of this writing. (The results of ongoing randomized studies may not be powered sufficiently to resolve the question.) Because the local recurrence rate currently is extremely low (only one reported recurrence), however, this finding is promising. Also exciting is the use of IORT as the sole radiation [table: see text] treatment following limited excision of breast cancer. The results of the Lanciano and Milano trials (see chapter 12) are awaited with great interest. Equally exciting is the finding of meaningful survival of 20% to 40% of patients who have local or regionally recurrent cancers when IORT is used as a component of treatment together with EBRT, maximal resection, and chemotherapy, as indicated. Many of these patients still have excessive rates of both local and distant relapse, however, necessitating the rationale for well-controlled multi-institutional studies that involve alternate systemic therapies, radiation sensitizers, among other criteria.