Evaluation of a new screening assay for HTLV‐1 and ‐2 antibodies for large‐scale use

Laboratory testing for Human T‐lymphotropic Virus type 1 and 2 (HTLV‐1 and ‐2) infections has become routine in blood transfusion, tissue transplantation and clinical diagnoses in many countries worldwide. Screening is usually based on the detection of antibodies to HTLV‐1 and/ or ‐2. The number of commercially available assays is limited, and among them, ELISA tests based on microtiter format are most commonly used. Recently, the new rHTLV‐I/II assay (Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL) was released; this assay was developed for an automatic large‐scale screening platform. This assay was evaluated using pre‐characterized serum panels and routine samples from the clinical laboratory. The sensitivity was 100% for HTLV‐1 and ‐2 (99/99 and 42/42, respectively, including one sample that was dually reactive, HTLV‐1 + 2). To test assay specificity, panels of blood donor sera, specimens from patients with autoimmune diseases and some viral infections were used. False‐reactive samples from previous HTLV diagnoses were also included. With these panels, the specificity was 99.4% (619/623). However, the four false‐reactive samples all belonged to the group of samples that were previously considered as false‐reactive for HTLV‐antibodies. All other samples were negative by the rHTLV‐I/II assay, and thus 100% specificity was obtained. The 1,412 samples tested in the clinic by this assay in routine use were all negative (100% specificity). Taken together, the overall specificity was 99.8%. The assay was sensitive, specific and appropriate for the large‐scale screening of samples for HTLV‐1/2 antibodies. J. Med. Virol. 82:1606–1611, 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Serum interferon and clinical manifestations of infection with human T-lymphotropic virus type III

Sera from 32 homosexual men were studied for the presence of antibodies against humanT-lymphotropic virus type III (HTLV III) and acidlabile interferon (IFN) alpha. Infection with HTLV III was found to be associated with the presence of serum IFN. IFN was detected in 74% of sera from male homosexuals with HTLV III antibody, but in only 6% of sera from antibody-negative individuals. More than 80% of sera from HTLV III-infected patients with the acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) or pre-AIDS conditions (generalized lymphadenopathy or the AIDS-related complex) were positive for IFN, while IFN was not present in sera from healthy homosexual men with HTLV III antibody. In conclusion, the presence of serum IFN may be predictive of the development of AIDS or pre-AIDS conditions in male homosexuals exposed to HTLV III.     

Comparison of two commercially available anti-HIV ELISAs: Abbott HTLV III EIA and Du Pont HTLV III-ELISA

Serum specimens were tested for HIV antibodies by two commercially available ELISAs (Abbott HTLV III EIA and Du Pont HTLV III-ELISA). The specificity and sensitivity of these assays were determined by comparison with indirect immunofluorescence and Western blot analysis. Specificity ranged from 94.3% in the Abbott assay to 97.9% in the Du Pont-ELISA. The sensitivity was 100% in the Abbott-ELISA and 99% in the Du Pont test. With both tests, false-positive results occurred predominantly in sera from patients with immunological disorders (kidney transplant recipients, lymphoma, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, etc.), whereas symptomatic AIDS-patients, patients with ARC, and persons with a defined risk for HIV infection could be diagnosed unequivocally. Specificity and sensitivity of anti-HIV ELISAs seemed to depend not only on definition of the cutoff value but also on other factors, such as antigen preparation and inactivation measures. Testing of ELISA-reactive sera by confirmatory tests remains necessary.     

Performance evaluation of the Abbott HTLV III EIA, a test for antibody to HTLV III in donor blood

An enzyme immunoassay (EIA), designed to detect antibodies to human T-cell lymphotropic virus type III (HTLV III), was evaluated. The antibody test was found to be highly sensitive; serum from 221 of 223 (99.1%) patients with acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) was positive for antibodies to HTLV III. In addition, the antibody test was found to be highly specific; approximately 99.75% of 20,720 serum or plasma samples from blood donors were negative for antibody to HTLV III. In most cases, the Western Blot analysis agreed well with the EIA. Eighty-one of 82 (98.8%) EIA-positive samples from patients with AIDS were Western Blot positive. Of the EIA-positive blood donors, 21 of 36 (58%) were detected and confirmed by Western Blot analysis. A solid-phase competitive EIA also was evaluated as an alternate procedure. The preliminary results indicate that this immunoassay has a high degree of sensitivity and specificity and could serve as an alternate procedure to detect antibody to HTLV III.     

An immunoglobulin G capture assay (GACRIA) for anti-HTLV III/LAV and its use as a confirmatory test

An immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody capture assay (GACRIA) methodologically distinct from other assays for the detection of antibodies to human T-lymphotropic virus type III/lymphadenopathy-associated virus (anti-HTLV III/LAV) was developed and used to test 1,055 serum samples previously screened by a competitive assay (COMPRIA). Eight hundred and twenty-three (78%) sera were positive and 129 (12.2%) negative in both assays. The coefficient of correlation between the two assays was 0.87, and COMPRIA appeared more sensitive than GACRIA. On retesting 103 sera that gave initially conflicting results, 81 discrepancies were resolved, 77 because of a change in the COMPRIA result. The 22 persistently discrepant samples gave an equivocal or positive result by COMPRIA and were negative by GACRIA. Thirteen of these 22 were positive in a commercial ELISA (ELAVIA). Twenty of them were also tested by Western blot; all were reactive with at least two HTLV III/LAV protein bands. The persistently discrepant samples were of four types: laboratory control sera (n = 2); naturally occurring weakly reactive samples (n = 5); samples that were anti-HTLV III/LAV IgG negative but IgM positive (n = 5; all five individuals from whom these samples were drawn were symptomatic); samples from one laboratory that were probably accidentally contaminated with anti-HTLV III/LAV-positive serum (n = 10). It was concluded that GACRIA for anti-HTLV III/LAV is specific and adequately sensitive and, in conjunction with other assays, is a useful confirmatory test whose format could readily be changed to ELISA.     

Identification of HTLV p19 specific natural human antibodies by competition with monoclonal antibody

A competitive binding assay using a monoclonal antibody to the human T-cell lymphoma/leukemia virus (HTLV) p19 was developed for use in detecting natural antibodies to the protein in human sera. The specificity of the assay for HTLV p19 was demonstrated using a variety of antisera. While sera known to contain antibodies to HTLV p19 competed in the assay, antisera prepared against purified HTLV p24, the major core protein of the virus, or against other disrupted type-C retroviruses did not. Sera of Japanese patients with adult T-cell leukemia and similar T-cell malignant lymphomas were examined by this technique for the presence of antibodies to HTLV p19. The results were compared with those obtained by a solid-phase radioimmunoassay (RIA) against disrupted HTLV. The majority of Japanese ATL patients possess natural antibodies to HTLV as shown by solid-phase RIA (88%) and also specifically to HTLV p19 (77%). Similarly, 50% of Japanese patients with similar T-cell malignant lymphomas possess HTLV antibodies by solid-phase RIA and nearly as many (42%) possess anti-p19 reactivity. Twelve and eight percent, respectively, of normal Japanese donors from the ATL endemic region possessed HTLV-specific antibody by the solid-phase RIA or competitive binding assay. Normal donors from nonendemic areas lacked antibodies to HTLV. These results extend our previous findings of natural antibodies to HTLV in Japanese patients with ATL. The finding of p19-specific antibodies in these Japanese sera, together with previous reports of natural antibodies to HTLV p24 in sera from this same geographic cluster, strengthens the association of HTLV with Japanese ATL.     

False positive antibody results against human T-cell lymphotropic virus in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome

Taiwan suffered from the outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in 2003. Our laboratory performed a series of virology and serology tests for SARS patients admitted to our hospital. Cross-reactivity was found when testing for antibody against human T-cell lymphotropic virus (HTLV) in one patient with SARS. Therefore, antibodies against HTLV were examined in paired-sera from 26 SARS patients. ELISA and a neutralization test were used to measure anti-SARS antibodies. Seroconversion for antibody against SARS-CoV was observed in all patients. Surprisingly, with the use of ELISA for HTLV, sera for 13 patients were positive for HTLV (50%), and seroconversion for HTLV was also observed in 10 patients (38.5%). Western blot for HTLV on those 26 paired-sera from 13 HTLV-positive patients displayed 5 positive results for HTLV-I, 7 positive results for HTLV-II, 1 positive result for both HTLV-I and II, 9 negative results for either HTLV-I or HTLV-II, and 4 "indeterminate" results. The findings that antibody to HTLV can be detected in blood samples collected from SARS patients provide important information for safe handling of blood products. Without such knowledge, blood products can be discarded mistakenly even though they contain anti-SARS-CoV antibodies that may be potentially valuable for SARS therapy.     

Radioimmunoassay and enzyme-linked immunoassay of antibodies to the core protein (P24) of human T-lymphotropic virus (HTLV III)

Human T-cell lymphotropic viruses designated HTLV III or LAV are considered to represent the causative agent(s) of the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). Individuals who have been infected with these viruses may generally be identified on the basis of a positive serological test for antibodies against the protein components of these viruses. Purified viruses or viral proteins have been utilized for developing such tests. Since AIDS may be transmitted by blood transfusion and by blood products, screening of donors for antibodies to HTLV III/LAV has become a necessity. Such screening may be facilitated by the application of assays based on the use of crude virus-infected tissue culture media avoiding elaborate, expensive and potentially hazardous virus purification steps. Serum specimens were mixed with an appropriate dilution of an HTLV III-infected tissue culture-derived fraction, obtained by precipitation with polyethylene glycol 6000 and treatment with Tween 80 and tri-n-butylphosphate (to disrupt virus particles), and incubated with polystyrene beads coated with antibodies to HTLV III/LAV (anti-HTLV III). Subsequently, washed beads were incubated with either 125I- or beta-lactamase-labeled anti-HTLV III. The radioactivity or enzymatic activity associated with the beads was proportionate to the quantity of HTLV III antigen originally added to the beads. The presence of anti-HTLV III in serum specimens resulted in decreased antigen binding and thus in decreased radioactivity or diminished beta-lactamase activity associated with the beads. The test was specific for antibodies to the approximately equal to 24 kDa core protein of HTLV III. The prevalence of these antibodies (given in parentheses) in distinct populations was as follows: random blood donors (0.33%); hemophiliacs (36.4%); random homosexual males (25.1%); homosexual males preselected on the basis of positive markers for infection with hepatitis B virus (50%); and those with persistent lymphadenopathy (70%).     

Evaluation of a new assay for antibodies to LAV/HTLV III

The sensitivity, specificity and reproducibility of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the detection of antibodies to LAV/HTLV III produced by Genetic Systems was assessed with the identical panel of sera used in previous evaluations of anti-HTLV III ELISAs. The results from this study show that the Genetic Systems anti-LAV/HTLV III ELISA proved to be of equivalent sensitivity and to have higher specificity than assays currently used in Australia for screening purposes while maintaining high levels of intra- and inter-laboratory reproducibility.     

Evaluation of a simultaneous HIV antigen and antibody detection test in Korean population

Current diagnosis of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection relies on the detection of anti-HIV antibodies by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Recently, kits detecting both p24 antigenemia and anti-HIV/anti-HIV2 antibodies have been developed. Thus, it is necessary to compare those kits developed as such. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic efficiency of a simultaneous detection test of p24 antigen and anti-HIV1/2 antibodies in a low prevalence area. Eight hundred and four randomly selected sera proven negative for HIV infection and 110 sera from 54 patients diagnosed as HIV infected, obtained between 1999 and 2000, were used for this study. One commercial lot of panels composed of consecutive sera obtained from known HIV-infected patient was included. Anti-HIV1/2 antibodies were detected by two different commercial ELISA kits, one from Korean and the other from German manufacturer. P24 antigen test was performed by ELISA. The simultaneous HIV antigen and antibody detection test was carried out. In the meantime, HIV RNA PCR and anti-HIV and anti-HIV2 western blot assays were also performed to confirm the test results in cases the test results didn't agree. The simultaneous detection kit showed 100% sensitivity and 99.6% specificity. Furthermore, the test displayed the possibility of earlier diagnosis than conventional anti-HIV1/2 ELISA with the results obtained from a group of consecutive panel sera infected with HIV. From these results, we concluded that the simultaneous HIV antigen and antibody detection test can be applied as a substitute clinical screening test in the place of conventional anti-HIV1/2 ELISA, and there is the probable benefit of early diagnosis.     

Evaluation of 14 commercial HIV-1/HIV-2 antibody assays using serum panels of different geographical origin and clinical stage including a unique seroconversion panel

The performance of 14 commercially available HIV-1/2 antibody assays were compared using well-characterized serum panels containing in total 1500–1800 sera. The panels included consecutive HIV-negative blood donor sera from Sweden, unselected blood donor and patient sera from Tanzania and unselected sera from outpatient clinics in Guinea-Bissau. Furthermore selected HIV-1 antibody positive sera from Sweden and Tanzania and HIV-2 antibody positive sera from Guinea-Bissau were included in the panels. The HIV-1 antibody positive sera were from individuals at various stages of HIV infection, from primary infection, to asymptomatic phase and late stage disease. 12 of the 14 assays identified correctly all HIV-1 and HIV-2 antibody positive sera. One Tanzanian HIV-1 antibody positive sample with complete banding pattern on Western blot was not detected by two of the ELISAs employing synthetic peptides. There were small differences in sensitivity between the assays when used for analysis of seroconversion panels. The most sensitive assay, Abbott IMx HIV-1/HIV-2 III Plus detected antibodies in all nine samples collected from four individuals during the first week after onset of symptoms of primary HIV-1 infection. Most of the assays became reactive during the second week after onset of symptoms and the least sensitive assays were reactive from the third week. The assays showed a high specificity ranging from 99.2 to 100% when used for analysis of Swedish blood donor sera, while most of the assays showed a significantly lower specificity, 91.9–99.6%, when used for testing African specimens.     

Immunological and virological investigation in patients with lymphoadenopathy syndrome and in a population at risk for acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), with particular focus on the detection of antibodies to human T-lymphotropic retroviruses (HTLV III)

Thirteen patients affected with unexplained lymphoadenopathy, fever, weight loss, and diarrhea (lymphoadenopathy syndrome; LAS) were evaluated for the possible appearance of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) and for immunological and virological characterization. The patients belonged to categories of individuals at risk for AIDS and were homosexual and/or drug abusers or hemophiliacs. Lymph node biopsy showed the histological picture of a follicular hyperplasia. The study of cell-mediated immunity (CMI), humoral immune response, and natural killer (NK) activity demonstrated a significant decrease in T cells with the helper/inducer phenotype (OKT ₄ ⁺ cells) and a relatively increased number of lymphocytes with the suppressor/cytotoxic phenotype (OKT ₈ ⁺ cells). NK activity was significantly lower than in normal controls. Thein vitro response to policlonal activators (phytohemagglutinin; PHA) and the cutaneous responsiveness to recall skin tests were impaired, whereas immunoglobulin production was increased, mainly in the IgG fraction. Virological studies showed high serum antibody titers to cytomegalovirus (CMV) but a lack of specific CMI as assayed by the leukocyte migration inhibition test (LMIT). CMV was also isolated from the urine specimen of one patient. The antibody pattern to Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) showed the uncommon contemporary presence of both Epstein-Barr nuclear antigen (EBNA) and early antigen (EA) antibodies. Antibodies to human T-lymphotropic retroviruses (HTLV III) were positive in 10 patients and the virus was isolated in 3 of them. In some patients the presence of serum antibodies to HTLV III was not associated with an impairment of the immune function. A group of individuals at risk for AIDS without LAS was also evaluated for the presence of HTLV III antibodies; the percentage of positive sera was 11.4. Nevertheless, individuals without specific antibodies had immunological abnormalities resembling those of LAS HTLV III-positive patients. The possible implications of these findings are discussed.     

Comparative studies of three serologic methods for the measurement of Mycoplasma pneumoniae antibodies

Antibodies against Mycoplasma pneumoniae in the sera of patients and normal adult controls were measured by a standard complement fixation (CF) test, a commercial immunofluorescence (IF) test (CROWNTITRE), and a commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (MYCOPLASMELISA). The findings showed that, in the control sera, 269 of 277 (97%) had negative results for CF antibodies. Of the 320 controls tested by the IF assay, all (100%) had negative results for IgM antibodies and 314 (98%) had negative results for IgG antibodies. Only 6 of the 201 (3%) controls by the ELISA were classified as negative/equivocal. Among the 450 patient sera, 105 (23%) had positive results for CF antibodies, and 158 (35%) had positive results for IgG and/or IgM membrane antibodies by the IF test; 424 of these patients' sera were also tested by the ELISA, and 397 (94%) of them were found to have positive results for anti-M. pneumoniae IgG antibodies. If the CF test were chosen as the standard for comparison, the IF test would have a sensitivity of 87% and a specificity of 81% and the ELISA would have a sensitivity of 71% and a specificity of 80%, provided an adjustment in the threshold ELISA-positive value was made. A single positive M. pneumoniae membrane IgM antibody titer appeared to be valuable for a presumptive diagnosis of an ongoing infection; 41 of 47 (87%) of the IgM-positive results in the paired sera were supported by a fourfold increase or a stable high level of CF antibody titer.     

Comparison of seven commercial kits for detection of antibodies toBorrelia burgdorferi

Five enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and two Western blot (WB) commercial kits were compared for their ability to detect antibodies toBorrelia burgdorferi. The panel of 53 test sera consisted of 25 sera positive for antibodies toBorrelia burgdorferi, 15 sera negative for such antibodies, 5 sera reactive in serologic tests for syphilis, and 8 sera containing antinuclear antibodies and/or rheumatoid factor. The rate of agreement with reference results was 93 %, 90 %, 90 % and 88 % for EIA kits from Diamedix, Cambridge Biotech, Mardx and Sigma respectively. The sensitivity and specificity was 84 % and 100 % respectively for Cambridge Biotech, 76 % and 94 % for Diamedix, 68 % and 83 % for Mardx, and 68 % and 83 % for Sigma. The three confirmatory tests, Cambridge Biotech WB, General Biometrics P39 EIA and Mardx WB, demonstrated 75 %, 60 % and 63 % agreement respectively. The sensitivity and specificity was 52 % and 100 % respectively for Cambridge Biotech WB, 24 % and 100 % for General Biometrics P39 EIA, and 44 % and 100 % for Mardx WB. The results demonstrate the variable performance of commercial serologic kits for detection of antibodies toBorrelia burgdorferi. WB appears to be a better confirmatory test than the single protein EIA.     

Prevalence of antibodies to HTLV in antenatal clinic attenders in South East London

The prevalence of antibodies to HTLV in women attending a south east London antenatal clinic between October 1990 and July 1992 was determined using sera referred for routine rubella antibody testing. Samples were screened for HTLV antibody using a modified Fujirebio gel particle agglutination test and reactive sera confirmed by ELISA (Abbott Laboratories, North Chicago, IL) and two commercial Western blots (Cambridge Biotech Inc., Rockville, MD, and Diagnostic Biotechnology, Genelab Diagnostics, Louvaine, Belgium). This strategy confirmed the presence of HTLV-1 antibodies in 12 out of 6,289 sera (0.19%, 95% confidence limits 0.083% to 0.30%) and HTLV-2 antibodies in 2 (0.03%) sera. Specimens from 8 of 821 (0.97%, 95% confidence limits 0.42% to 1.9%) Afro-Caribbean women, three of 1,136 (0.26%, 95% confidence limits 0.055% to 0.78%) African women, and one of 3,049 (0.033%, 95% confidence limits 0.006% to 0.18%) Caucasian women were positive for HTLV-1 antibodies. Sera from Afro-Caribbean women born in the Caribbean were 7.6 times more likely to be HTLV-1 antibody positive than sera from Afro-Caribbean women born in the UK (P = 0.012). Selective testing of Afro-Caribbean and African antenatal clinic attenders, in this setting, would have identified 11 of the 12 HTLV-1 infections at an estimated cost of prevention of HTLV-1 associated disease of £100,000 per case which is considerably less than the £1.3 million which has been estimated to prevent a case by universal screening of UK blood donors. J. Med. Virol. 52:326–329, 1997. © 1997 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Human T-cell lymphotropic virus in a population of pregnant women and commercial sex workers in South Western Nigeria

Background: Over 20 million persons are infected with HTLV-I/II globally. The virus is endemic in Africa and it is also transmitted sexually. Continued identification of high risk groups is important for the control of the disease. Objectives: To determine the prevalence of HTLV infection amongst two highly sexually active groups, pregnant women and CSWs in South Western Nigeria. Methods: Serum samples were tested for the presence of HTLV-I/II antibodies using the Vironostika((R)) HTLV-I/II micro ELISA system. Results: A total of 364 serum samples collected from pregnant women, commercial sex worker (CSW) and secondary school students (control group) from Ibadan. While only 4 (5.1%) of 78 secondary school students (average age: 13years) were reactive for HTLV infection, 20 (16.7%) of 120 pregnant women (average age: 26years) and 38 (22.9%) of 166 CSWs (average age: 23years) were found to have antibodies against HTLV in their sera. The results of this study thus show that HTLV infection is active in the population although higher in pregnant women (although not statistically significant) and CSWs (p>0.05). Pregnant women and CSWs are therefore at a higher risk of HTLV transmission than other members of the population. Conclusion: Routine screening for HTLV infection may go a long way to understanding the epidemiology of HTLV infection in Nigeria and subsequently provide tools for its prevention and control.     

Usefulness of enzyme linked immunosorbent assays species specific in the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Chlamydophila pneumoniae IgG antibodies in patients with genital infections or respiratory tract infections

Chlamydia trachomatis (Ct) and Chlamydophila pneumoniae (Cpn) are obligate intracellular bacteria causing genital tract infections (GTI) and respiratory tract infections (RTI), respectively. Antigenic cross-reactivity between the two species may complicate serologic diagnosis. In this study, we compared the performance of two ELISA tests in relation to microimmunofluorescence (MIF) for the detection of Ct and Cpn IgG antibodies. We also explored the degree of cross-reactivity by ELISA and MIF. Among 278 positive sera for Cpn and/or Ct IgG antibodies in the MIF, 153 were from patients with GTI and 125 were from patients with RTI. These sera were tested by our in house MIF test and by two commercial ELISA: SeroCP and SeroCT for the detection of anti-Cpn IgG antibodies and anti-Ct IgG antibodies, respectively. In sera from patients with RTI, correlation between MIF and SeroCP was 92%. The specificity of this test was 38.5%. In fact, among the 140 sera from patients with GTI and that cross-reacted in MIF, only six were confirmed by the two ELISA tests as having IgG antibodies to Ct. The correlation between MIF and SeroCT was 80%. The specificity of this test was 100%. Indeed, among the 65 sera from patients with RTI with cross-reactions in MIF, 30 sera showed a negative SeroCT test. SeroCT was highly specific and could diminish considerably the extent of cross-reactions. Whilst, SeroCP test was not specific enough to distinguish between the presence of IgG antibodies and Cpn or Ct.     

Secreted portion of glycoprotein g of herpes simplex virus type 2 is a novel antigen for type-discriminating serology

The secreted portion of glycoprotein G (sgG-2) of herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) was evaluated as a novel antigen in an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) format for detection of type-specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies in HSV-2-infected patients. The results were compared with those obtained by a commercially available assay, the HerpeSelect 2 ELISA (the FOCUS2 assay). Five different panels of sera were analyzed: panel A consisted of 109 serum samples from patients with a culture-proven HSV-1 infection that were Western blotting (WB) negative for HSV-2; panel B consisted of 106 serum samples from patients with a culture-proven recurrent HSV-2 infection that were WB positive for HSV-2; panel C consisted of 100 serum samples with no detectable IgG antibodies against HSV-1 and HSV-2; panel D consisted of 70 HSV-2 negative "tricky" serum samples containing antinuclear IgG antibodies or IgM antibodies against other viruses or bacteria; and panel E consisted of consecutive serum samples from 21 patients presenting with a first episode of HSV-2-induced lesions. When sera in panels A to C were analyzed, the sgG-2 ELISA and the FOCUS2 assay both showed sensitivities and specificities of >or=98%. In total, among the samples in panel D, 13 serum samples (19%) were false positive by the FOCUS2 assay and 1 serum sample (1.4%) was false positive by the sgG-2 ELISA. When the sera in panel E were analyzed, the sgG-2 ELISA detected seroconversion somewhat later than WB or the FOCUS2 assay did. We conclude that sgG-2 induces an HSV-2 type-specific antibody response and can be used for type-discriminating serology.     

Application of the Serodia-HCV particle agglutination for the detection of antibodies to hepatitis C virus

The Serodia-HCV Particle Agglutination (HCV-PA) for the detection of HCV antibodies was compared with the Enzyme Immunoassay Test (UBI HCV EIA) for possible in-house use. A total of 150 specimens were analysed using UBI HCV EIA and Serodia-HCV PA. Of these, 80 (53.3%) were both PA and EIA positive and 59 (39.3%) were negative by both techniques. Eleven sera (7.4%) were found to be EIA-positive but PA-negative. These 11 discordant sera were further tested by the LiaTek-HCV III Immunoassay (Organon Teknika). Ten were found to be line immunoassay negative and one was line immunoassay positive. Failure of the PA to detect the HCV positive serum meant that a small proportion of HCV antibody positives may be missed by the PA test. We conclude that (i) EIA should continue to be the first line screening test in our laboratory, (ii) PA with its 100% specificity could be a useful supplementary screen for all EIA-positive sera and finally (iii) line immunoassay could be used on sera to resolve discordant results in the EIA and PA assays.     

Platelet antibody screening by flow cytometry is more sensitive than solid phase red cell adherence assay and lymphocytotoxicity technique: a comparative study in Thai patients

The objective of this study was to compare the sensitivity and specificity of lymphocytotoxicity test (LCT), solid phase red cell adherence assay (SPRCA) and flow cytometry in detecting platelet reactive antibodies against human leukocyte antigens (HLA) class I and human platelet antigens (HPA). Sera from 38 thrombocytopenic patients and 5 mothers of thrombocytopenic newborns were screened for platelet reactive antibodies by these three methods using screening platelets and/or lymphocytes panels derived from six subjects. The sensitivity and specificity of each method and levels of agreement were analysed. HLA antibodies were found in 18, 17 and 19 out of 43 patients' sera tested by LCT, SPRCA and flow cytometry, respectively. Four out of 43 patients' sera were reactive against HPA by flow cytometry, but were reactive to only 2 sera by SPRCA. Using flow cytometry as the reference method, the sensitivities/specificities of SPRCA and LCT in HLA antibody detection were 84.21/95.83% and 94.73/100%, respectively, with a good strength of agreement. SPRCA had 50% sensitivity and 100% specificity in HPA antibody detection compare to flow cytometry. Flow cytometry appeared to be the most sensitive technique compared with SPRCA and LCT for both HPA and HLA antibody screening. SPRCA sensitivity was too low for HPA antibody detection, but this might be because of the small number of samples. There was one serum from the mother of a baby suffering neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia (NAIT), in whom SPRCA could not detect HPA antibodies, while flow cytometry came out positive. Therefore, SPRCA should not be used in NAIT investigation and flow cytometry should be employed instead.