Four-year biochemical outcome after radioimmunoguided transperineal brachytherapy for patients with prostate adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE: To evaluate 4-year biochemical outcomes for patients with prostate adenocarcinoma who underwent radioimmunoguided (Prostascint) permanent prostate brachytherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eighty patients with clinical T1C-T3A NxM0 prostate cancer underwent ProstaScint-guided prostate brachytherapy using either (103)Pd or (125)I between February 1997 and December 2000. Sixty-seven patients underwent prostate brachytherapy alone, whereas 13 patients received neoadjuvant hormonal manipulation before implantation. Risk factors (RF) included PSA >10, Stage >or=T2b, and Gleason grade >or=7. Sixty patients had low-risk disease (0 RF), 17 were intermediate risk (1 RF), and 3 were high risk (2 RF). Biochemical disease-free survival (bDFS) was calculated using the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) consensus criteria, a PSA cutoff of 1.0 ng/mL, and a PSA cutoff of 0.5 ng/mL. RESULTS: Four-year bDFS for the entire cohort was 97.4% using the ASTRO consensus criteria. Low-risk patients (60) had a 4-year bDFS of 100%; intermediate- and high-risk patients (20 patients) were 89.2%. The hormonally na?ve group (67 patients) had a 4-year bDFS of 96.9% and a median PSA nadir of 0.2 ng/mL. Median time to nadir was 19.8 months (range: 1.9-53.2 months). For the neoadjuvant hormonal therapy group (13 patients), ASTRO-defined bDFS was 100%. Overall, 85.2% of patients had a posttreatment PSA 相似文献   

The impact of irregularly rising prostate-specific antigen and "impending failure" on the apparent outcome of localized prostate cancer following radiotherapy

PURPOSE: To examine the impact of irregularly rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and "impending" biochemical failure on the apparent rate of biochemical relapse following radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We analyzed the outcome of 572 patients with T1/T2 prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy alone at the Princess Margaret Hospital (median follow-up, 4.21 years). Biochemical outcomes were analyzed using 2 different definitions of failure: (1) the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) definition, and (2) a modified definition that included 2 consecutive rises in PSA, with a minimum rise of 1.5 ng/mL above the nadir, or a nadir value of greater than 4 ng/mL. Patients were defined as having "impending failure" when the last 2 PSA measurements taken demonstrated 2 consecutive rises. RESULTS: Two-hundred and thirty patients (40%) met the ASTRO definition of failure; 258 patients (48%) failed by the modified definition (p = 0.001). Five-year biochemical relapse-free rate (bNED) rate was 55% using the ASTRO definition, and 49% using the modified definition. This difference in 5-year bNED was greatest for patients with high-risk disease (ASTRO definition 30% vs. modified definition 15%). Twenty-four of the 38 additional cases identified as biochemical failures by the modified definition had irregularly rising PSA levels; 14 were "impending failures." These additional 38 patients had a median PSA elevation 5.4 ng/mL above the nadir, and a high risk of subsequent clinical failure (4-year clinical failure-free rate of 63%). The ASTRO definition had a sensitivity of 87% and specificity of 74% for predicting clinical relapse. The modified definition had a sensitivity of 95% and a specificity of 70%. CONCLUSION: A definition of biochemical failure that includes an absolute allowable rise in PSA above the nadir can identify patients with rising PSA who are at substantial risk of clinical relapse, but who are not defined as biochemical failures by the ASTRO definition. This is particularly true for patients with high-risk disease. The use of a uniform definition of biochemical failure is crucial to ensure that differences in apparent outcome are not due to differences in the definition of relapse. Currently, the ASTRO definition should remain the standard. Large cohort studies with long follow-up can be utilized to optimize the definition of biochemical failure following radiotherapy for prostate cancer.     

Defining biochemical failure following radiotherapy with or without hormonal therapy in men with clinically localized prostate cancer: recommendations of the RTOG-ASTRO Phoenix Consensus Conference

In 1996 the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) sponsored a Consensus Conference to establish a definition of biochemical failure after external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). The ASTRO definition defined prostate specific antigen (PSA) failure as occurring after three consecutive PSA rises after a nadir with the date of failure as the point halfway between the nadir date and the first rise or any rise great enough to provoke initiation of therapy. This definition was not linked to clinical progression or survival; it performed poorly in patients undergoing hormonal therapy (HT), and backdating biased the Kaplan-Meier estimates of event-free survival. A second Consensus Conference was sponsored by ASTRO and the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group in Phoenix, Arizona, on January 21, 2005, to revise the ASTRO definition. The panel recommended: (1) a rise by 2 ng/mL or more above the nadir PSA be considered the standard definition for biochemical failure after EBRT with or without HT; (2) the date of failure be determined "at call" (not backdated). They recommended that investigators be allowed to use the ASTRO Consensus Definition after EBRT alone (no hormonal therapy) with strict adherence to guidelines as to "adequate follow-up." To avoid the artifacts resulting from short follow-up, the reported date of control should be listed as 2 years short of the median follow-up. For example, if the median follow-up is 5 years, control rates at 3 years should be cited. Retaining a strict version of the ASTRO definition would allow comparisons with a large existing body of literature.     

Permanent interstitial brachytherapy for clinically organ-confined high-grade prostate cancer with a pretreatment PSA < 20 ng/mL

The objective of this study was to determine the effect of biopsy Gleason score 8 and 9 histology on biochemical outcome following a permanent prostate brachytherapy approach that includes multiple periprostatic seeds and supplemental external beam radiation. Forty-six consecutive T1c-T2b (1997 AJCC) patients with Gleason score 8 and 9 prostate cancer who were either hormone naive (33 patients) or received cytoreductive (< or =6 months) hormonal therapy (13 patients) underwent brachytherapy from June 1995 to November 2000. The median patient age was 69.7 years, with a median pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) of 7.7 ng/mL. The median follow-up was 58 months (range 27-93 months). Forty-five of the patients were implanted with Pd-103 and 44 received supplemental external beam radiation therapy (45 Gy). Biochemical success was defined by either a PSA < or = 0.4 ng/mL after a nadir or by the ASTRO consensus definition. The actuarial 7-year biochemical disease-free survival was 84.8% using either a PSA < or = 0.4 ng/mL or the ASTRO consensus definition. The median postimplant PSA was less than 0.1 ng/mL for both the hormone naive and hormonally manipulated patients. The utilization of hormonal therapy for 6 months or less duration resulted in a statistically nonsignificant improvement in biochemical outcome (92.3% versus 81.8%, P = 0.393). When stratified by pretreatment PSA, 87.9% of patients with a pretreatment PSA < or = 10 ng/mL and 76.9% with a pretreatment PSA > 10 ng/mL (P = 0.377) remained biochemically free of disease. In multivariate analysis, none of the clinical, treatment, or dosimetric parameters predicted for outcome. Following a permanent prostate brachytherapy approach that used multiple periprostatic seeds, the majority of patients with clinically organ-confined Gleason score 8 and 9 prostate cancer remain biochemically free of disease with identical outcomes for both biochemical definitions of success.     

Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) in the postoperative treatment of an adenocarcinoma of the endometrium complicated by a pelvic kidney

Purpose

To report early observation of transient PSA elevations on this pilot study of external beam radiation therapy and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) guided high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy boost.

Materials and methods

Eleven patients with intermediate-risk and high-risk localized prostate cancer received MRI guided HDR brachytherapy (10.5 Gy each fraction) before and after a course of external beam radiotherapy (46 Gy). Two patients continued on hormones during follow-up and were censored for this analysis. Four patients discontinued hormone therapy after RT. Five patients did not receive hormones. PSA bounce is defined as a rise in PSA values with a subsequent fall below the nadir value or to below 20% of the maximum PSA level. Six previously published definitions of biochemical failure to distinguish true failure from were tested: definition 1, rise >0.2 ng/mL; definition 2, rise >0.4 ng/mL; definition 3, rise >35% of previous value; definition 4, ASTRO defined guidelines, definition 5 nadir + 2 ng/ml, and definition 6, nadir + 3 ng/ml.

Results

Median follow-up was 24 months (range 18–36 mo). During follow-up, the incidence of transient PSA elevation was: 55% for definition 1, 44% for definition 2, 55% for definition 3, 33% for definition 4, 11% for definition 5, and 11% for definition 6.

Conclusion

We observed a substantial incidence of transient elevations in PSA following combined external beam radiation and HDR brachytherapy for prostate cancer. Such elevations seem to be self-limited and should not trigger initiation of salvage therapies. No definition of failure was completely predictive.     

Outcomes following iodine-125 prostate brachytherapy with or without neoadjuvant androgen deprivation

Purpose

To report the biochemical failure-free survival (BFFS), cause-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS) outcomes of patients treated with iodine-125 (I-125) brachytherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer.

Methods and materials

Between 2003 and 2009, I-125 permanent prostate brachytherapy without supplemental external-beam radiotherapy was performed for 663 patients with low-risk and low-tier intermediate-risk (defined as organ-confined disease, PSA <10 ng/mL, and Gleason score 3 + 4 with biopsy positive core rate <33%) prostate cancer. Early in the study period, the preplanning method was used in the first 104 patients, and later the real-time planning method was used. Biochemical failure was determined using the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology Oncology (ASTRO) and Phoenix definitions.

Results

The 7-year BFFS rates for the ASTRO and Phoenix definitions were 96.1% and 95.9%, respectively. The corresponding BFFS rates by risk group were 97.6% and 96.7% for low-risk, and 91.8% and 93.6% for low-tier intermediate-risk disease (p = 0.007 and 0.08, respectively). The median times to biochemical failure in those who failed were 29.5 and 43.9 months according to the ASTRO and Phoenix definitions, respectively. The 7-year CSS and OS were 99.1% and 96.4%. There was no significant difference in CSS or OS between the low-risk and low-tier intermediate-risk groups. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, risk group and prostate D90 were independent predictors of BFFS for the ASTRO definition, while only the prostate D90 was significant for the Phoenix definition.

Conclusion

I-125 prostate brachytherapy results in excellent 7-year BFFS, CSS, and OS for low-risk and low-tier intermediate-risk prostate cancer.     

Five-year biochemical outcome following permanent interstitial brachytherapy for clinical T1-T3 prostate cancer

PURPOSE: To evaluate 5-year biochemical disease-free outcome for men with clinical T1b-T3a NxM0 1977 American Joint Committee on Cancer (1997 AJCC) adenocarcinoma of the prostate gland who underwent transperineal ultrasound-guided permanent prostate brachytherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Four hundred twenty-five patients underwent transperineal ultrasound-guided prostate brachytherapy using either 103Pd or 125I, for clinical T1b-T3a NxM0 (1997 AJCC) adenocarcinoma of the prostate gland, from April 1995 to October 1999. No patient underwent pathologic lymph-node staging. One hundred ninety patients were implanted with either 103Pd or 125I monotherapy; 235 patients received moderate-dose external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), followed by a prostate brachytherapy boost; 163 patients received neoadjuvant hormonal manipulation, in conjunction with either 103Pd or 125I monotherapy (77 patients) or in conjunction with moderate-dose EBRT and a prostate brachytherapy boost (86 patients). The median patient age was 68.0 years (range, 48.2-81.3 years). The median follow-up was 31 months (range, 11-69 months). Follow-up was calculated from the day of implantation. No patient was lost to follow-up. Biochemical disease-free survival was defined by the American Society of Therapeutic Radiation and Oncology (ASTRO) consensus definition. RESULTS: For the entire cohort, the 5-year actuarial biochemical no evidence of disease (bNED) survival rate was 94%. For patients with low-, intermediate-, and high-risk disease, the 5-year biochemical disease-free rates were 97.1%, 97.5%, and 84.4%, respectively. For hormone-naive patients, 95.7%, 96.4%, and 79.9% of patients with low-, intermediate-, and high-risk disease were free of biochemical failure. Clinical and treatment parameters predictive of biochemical outcome included: clinical stage, pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA), Gleason score, risk group, age > 65 years, and neoadjuvant hormonal therapy. Isotope choice was not a statistically significant predictor of disease-free survival for any risk group. The median postimplant PSA was < or = 0.2 for all risk groups, regardless of hormonal status. The mean posttreatment PSA, however, was significantly lower for men implanted with 103Pd (0.14 ng/mL) than for those implanted with 125I (0.25 ng/mL), p < or = 0.001. CONCLUSION: With a median follow-up of 31 months, permanent prostate brachytherapy results in a high probability of actuarial 5-year biochemical disease-free survival (DFS) for patients with clinical T1b-T3a (1997 AJCC) adenocarcinoma of the prostate gland, with an apparent plateau on the PSA survival curve.     

Comparison of biochemical failure definitions for permanent prostate brachytherapy

PURPOSE: To assess prostate-specific antigen (PSA) failure definitions for patients with Stage T1-T2 prostate cancer treated by permanent prostate brachytherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 2,693 patients treated with radioisotopic implant as solitary treatment for T1-T2 prostatic adenocarcinoma were studied. All patients had a pretreatment PSA, were treated at least 5 years before analysis, 1988 to 1998, and did not receive hormonal therapy before recurrence. Multiple PSA failure definitions were tested for their ability to predict clinical failure. RESULTS: Definitions which determined failure by a certain increment of PSA rise above the lowest PSA level to date (nadir + x ng/mL) were more sensitive and specific than failure definitions based on PSA doubling time or a certain number of PSA rises. The sensitivity and specificity for the nadir + 2 definition were 72% and 83%, vs. 51% and 81% for 3 PSA rises. The surgical type definitions (PSA exceeding an absolute value) could match this sensitivity and specificity but only when failure was defined as exceeding a PSA level in the 1-3 ng/mL range and only when patients were allowed adequate time to nadir. When failure definitions were compared by time varying covariate regression analysis, nadir + 2 ng/mL retained the best fit. CONCLUSIONS: For patients treated by permanent radioisotopic implant for prostate cancer, the definition nadir + 2 ng/mL provides the best surrogate for failure throughout the entire follow-up period, similar to patients treated by external beam radiotherapy. Therefore, the same PSA failure definition could be used for both modalities. For brachytherapy patients with long-term follow-up, at least 6 years, defining failure as exceeding an absolute PSA level in the 0.5 ng/mL range may be reasonable.     

PSA kinetics and PSA bounce following permanent seed prostate brachytherapy

PURPOSE: To report the incidence, timing, and magnitude of the benign prostate-specific antigen (PSA) bounce after 125I prostate brachytherapy and correlate the bounce with clinical and/or dosimetric factors. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From March 1999 to August 2003, a total of 292 men received 125I prostate brachytherapy without androgen deprivation or supplemental beam radiotherapy and have PSA follow-up >30 months. Implants were preplanned using transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) and performed under transrectal ultrasound/fluoroscopy guidance using preloaded needles. A PSA bounce is defined as an increase >or=0.2 ng/ml with spontaneous return to prebounce level or lower. RESULTS: Resolved PSA bounces were seen in 40% of men with follow-up >30 months. Median onset was 15 months, and median magnitude was 0.76 ng/ml. Magnitude >2 ng/ml was seen in 15%. The only clinical or dosimetric factor predictive of bounce in multivariate analysis was younger age. Median time to increasing PSA level indicative of failure was 30 months. CONCLUSIONS: Benign PSA bounces are common after 125I prostate brachytherapy, especially in younger men. An increase >2 ng/ml above the nadir was seen in 15%. Magnitude of increase does not distinguish bounce from failure. Time to the start of the PSA increase can be helpful, but is not absolute. The PSA bounce does not predict subsequent failure. Caution is advised in interpreting an early increasing PSA level in the first 30 months after 125I brachytherapy in favorable-risk patients.     

Five-year biochemical outcome after prostate brachytherapy for hormone-naive men ≤ 62 years of age

To evaluate 5-year biochemical disease-free outcome for hormone naïve men 62 years of age or less who underwent transperineal ultrasound-guided permanent prostate brachytherapy.

76 patients underwent transperineal ultrasound guided prostate brachytherapy using either ¹⁰³Pd or ¹²⁵I for clinical T1b–T2b N×M0 (1997 AJCC) adenocarcinoma of the prostate gland from April 1995 to October 1999. No patient was lost to follow-up, and no patient underwent pathologic lymph-node staging. 47 patients were implanted with either ¹⁰³Pd or ¹²⁵I monotherapy, and 29 patients received moderate-dose external-beam radiation therapy followed by a prostate brachytherapy boost. No patient received hormonal manipulation. The median patient age was 58 years (range, 48–62 years). The median follow-up was 37 months (range, 14–70 months). Follow-up was calculated from the day of implantation. Biochemical disease-free survival was defined by the American Society of Therapeutic Radiation and Oncology (ASTRO) consensus definition.

The actuarial 5-year biochemical disease-free survival rate was 98.7%. For patients with low-, intermediate-, and high-risk disease, 97.7%, 100%, and 100%, respectively, were free of biochemical failure. The median posttreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) for the entire group was 0.2 ng/mL. When stratified by risk group, the median posttreatment PSA was 0.2, 0.15, and 0.1 for patients with low-, intermediate-, and high-risk disease, respectively.

With a median follow-up of 37 months, hormone naïve patients ≤ 62 years of age have a high probability of 5-year biochemical disease-free survival following permanent prostate brachytherapy with an apparent plateau on the PSA curve.     

Prostate-specific antigen spikes after permanent prostate brachytherapy

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether any clinical, treatment, or dosimetric parameters correlated with the development of a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) spike after permanent prostate brachytherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The evaluated population consisted of 218 hormone-naive patients free of biochemical or clinical failure who underwent permanent prostate brachytherapy with or without supplemental external beam radiotherapy for clinical Stage T1b-T3a adenocarcinoma of the prostate gland (1997 AJCC) between August 1995 and November 1999. No patient underwent pre- or postimplant hormonal manipulation, pretreatment seminal vesicle biopsy, or pathologic lymph node staging. In addition, none of the 218 patients possessed equivocal biochemical results (one or two consecutive PSA rises or a declining PSA >1.0 ng/mL). The median patient follow-up was 46.2 months. A PSA spike was defined as a rise of >or=0.2 ng/mL, followed by a durable decline. The clinical parameters evaluated included patient age, clinical T stage, Gleason score, pretreatment PSA level, prostate volume, brachytherapy planning volume, and patient follow-up in months. The evaluated treatment parameters included isotope and use of supplemental external beam radiotherapy. The dosimetric parameters evaluated included the minimal dose received by 90% of the prostate gland (D(90)), the percentage of the prostate volume receiving 100% (V(100)), 150%, and 200% (V(200)) of the prescribed minimal peripheral dose, and the mean, median, maximal, and minimal urethral doses. Biochemical disease-free survival was defined by the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology consensus definition with the additional constraint that the most recent PSA level was 0.2 to 0.5 to 1.0 ng/mL (20%, 50%, and 80%, respectively, p <0.001). In Cox multivariate regression analysis, patient age, clinical stage, first postimplant PSA level, and V(150) were predictive for the development of a PSA spike. A postimplant dosimetric threshold of either <115% of the minimal peripheral dose for D(90) or <55% of the prostate volume for V(150) was strongly predictive of a spike. When the variables only determinable after the occurrence of the PSA spike were included in the multivariate analysis, V(150), preimplant PSA level, and nadir PSA were the significant predictors. CONCLUSION: Of the patients, 23.9% developed a PSA spike with a median time to development of 16.3 months and a median prespike and median postspike PSA of 0.50 ng/mL and 0.90 ng/mL, respectively. In multivariate analysis, patient age, clinical stage, first postimplant PSA level, and V(150) were predictive for the development of a PSA spike. At approximately 66 months after implantation, the PSA curves converged for spike and nonspike patients, with a median PSA level <0.1 ng/mL.     

Multi-institutional analysis of long-term outcome for stages T1-T2 prostate cancer treated with permanent seed implantation

PURPOSE: To assess long-term prostate-specific antigen (PSA) outcome after permanent prostate brachytherapy (BT) and identify predictors of improved disease-free survival. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eleven institutions combined data on 2,693 patients treated with permanent interstitial BT monotherapy for T1-T2 prostate cancer. Of these patients, 1,831 (68%) were treated with I-125 (median dose, 144 Gy) and 862 (32%) were treated with Pd-103 (median dose, 130 Gy). Criteria for inclusion were: available pre-BT PSA, BT > or =5 years before data submission, BT between 1988-1998, and no androgen deprivation before failure. The median follow-up was 63 months. RESULTS: Among patients where the I-125 dose to 90% of the prostate (D90) was > or =130 Gy, the 8-year PSA relapse-free survival (PRFS) was 93% compared with 76% for those with lower D90 dose levels (p < 0.001). A multivariable analysis identified tumor stage (p = 0.002), Gleason score (p < 0.001), pretreatment PSA level (p < 0.001), treatment year (p = 0.001), and the isotope used (p = 0.004) as pretreatment and treatment variables associated with PRFS. When restricted to patients with available postimplantation dosimetric information, D90 emerged as a significant predictor of biochemical outcome (p = 0.01), and isotope was not significant. The 8-year PRFS was 92%, 86%, 79%, and 67%, respectively, for patients with PSA nadir values of 0-0.49, 0.5-0.99, 1.0-1.99, and >2.0 ng/mL (p < 0.001). Among patients free of biochemical relapse at 8 years, the median nadir level was 0.1 ng/mL, and 90% of these patients achieved a nadir PSA level <0.6 ng/mL. CONCLUSIONS: Outcome after permanent BT for prostatic cancer relates to tumor stage, Gleason score, pretreatment PSA, BT year, and post-BT dosimetric quality. PSA nadir < or =0.5 ng/mL was particularly associated with durable long-term PSA disease-free survival. The only controllable factor to impact on long-term outcome was the D90 which is a reflection of implant quality.     

Prostate-specific antigen bounce after prostate seed implantation for localized prostate cancer: descriptions and implications

PURPOSE: To calculate the actuarial risk of developing a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) bounce after prostate brachytherapy alone, using three definitions of bounce mentioned in the literature, and to explore the relationship between disease and treatment variables and the risk of developing a bounce. The impact of PSA bounce on PSA failure was also explored. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 373 patients with T1-T2 prostate cancer underwent radioactive seed implant using 125I (n = 337) or 103Pd (n = 36) without hormonal therapy or external beam RT. All patients had a minimum of 1 year (median 4, maximum 11) of follow-up and at least three follow-up PSA values. PSA bounce was defined by a rise of one or two PSA values with a subsequent fall. Three definitions of bounce were used: definition 1, rise > or = 0.1 ng/mL; definition 2, rise > or = 0.4 ng/mL; and definition 3, rise >35% of previous value. RESULTS: The actuarial likelihood of experiencing a PSA bounce at 5 years was 31% for definition 1, 17% for definition 2, and 20% for definition 3. The median time to develop a bounce was 19.5 months for definitions 1 and 2 and 20.5 months for definition 3. Gleason score, initial PSA level, and clinical stage did not predict for bounce using any definition. Using definition 1, younger patients (< or = 65 years) had a bounce rate at 5 years of 38% vs. 24% for older patients (p = 0.009). 125I patients receiving an implant dose of < or = 160 Gy had a bounce rate (definition 1) at 5 years of 24% vs. 38% for those receiving a dose delivered to 90% of the gland on the 1 month postimplant dose-volume histogram (D90) >160 Gy (p = 0.04). Using definition 2, prostate volume significantly affected the incidence of bounce. Patients with larger glands (>35 cm(3)) were more likely to experience a bounce (23% at 5 years) than those with smaller glands (< or = 35 cm(3)) who had a bounce rate of 11% at 5 years (p = 0.01). In a multivariate analysis of factors predicting for PSA failure, PSA bounce was not found to be significant. CONCLUSION: PSA bounce is a common phenomenon after prostate brachytherapy and occurs at a rate of 17-31%, depending on the definition used. It is more common in younger patients, those receiving higher implant doses, and those with larger glands. PSA bounce does not predict for future PSA failure.     

The Phoenix definition of biochemical failure predicts for overall survival in patients with prostate cancer

BACKGROUND: The American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) definition of biochemical failure (BF) incorporates backdating, resulting in an artificial flattening of Kaplan-Meier curves and overly favorable estimates when follow-up is short. The nadir + 2 ng/mL (Nadir + 2; Phoenix) definition reduces these artifacts. The objective of the current study was to compare ASTRO and Phoenix BF estimates as determinants of distant metastasis (DM), cause-specific mortality (CSM), and overall mortality (OM). METHODS: A total of 1831 patients with T1-4N0M0 prostate cancer were treated with external beam radiotherapy (RT) using conventional or three-dimensional conformal methods to at least 60 grays (Gy). The median follow-up was 71 months and the median RT dose was 72 Gy (range, 60-79 Gy). Cox regression models incorporating BF as a time-dependent covariate were used for both univariate and multivariate analyses. Other covariates included in the analyses were T classification, Gleason score, neoadjuvant/adjuvant androgen deprivation, age, RT dose, and pretreatment prostate-specific antigen. RESULTS: BF was observed in 389 men (21%) using the Phoenix definition and 460 men (25%) using the ASTRO definition. DM was observed in 84 patients (5%), 48 patients (3%) patients died of prostate cancer, and 404 patients (22%) died of any cause. The Phoenix definition of BF was found to be a significant predictor of DM, CSM, and OM, after controlling for other significant covariates. The ASTRO definition was found to be associated with CSM and DM, but not OM. CONCLUSIONS: The Phoenix definition of BF is a more robust determinant of patient outcome compared with the ASTRO definition. The correlation with mortality, including OM, and the independence of this correlation from the use of neoadjuvant/adjuvant androgen deprivation, supports the use of Nadir + 2 in prostate cancer clinical trials of RT with or without androgen deprivation.     

Modern prostate brachytherapy. Prostate specific antigen results in 219 patients with up to 12 years of observed follow-up

BACKGROUND: The purported lack of long term modern prostate brachytherapy outcome data continues to lead many physicians to recommend other, more traditional treatments. This concern for long term results has encouraged the authors to supplement their earlier 10-year follow-up of patients receiving brachytherapy; in the process, an additional 77 patients (> 50%) were added to the original cohort, and the follow-up time was increased by 2 years. METHODS: Between January 1987 and September 1989, 229 patients with T1-T3 prostate carcinoma underwent transperineal prostate brachytherapy using iodine-125 (I-125). No patient received adjuvant hormone therapy. The median Gleason sum was 5 (range, 2-10). Of these patients, 147 were determined to have a high probability of organ-confined disease and were treated solely with an I-125 implant. The remaining 82 patients were determined to be at increased risk for extracapsular disease and received pelvic external beam radiation in addition to brachytherapy. All patients were followed continuously. Failure was defined as a positive biopsy, radiographic evidence of metastases, or three consecutive rises in prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels as defined by the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) consensus article. RESULTS: Excluding deaths from intercurrent disease, the median follow-up was 122 months (range, 18-144 months). Fourteen patients were excluded from analysis due to insufficient follow-up. Adopting the ASTRO definition of failure resulted in minimal change in survival when compared with the authors' previous study, which used a PSA level > 0.5 ng/mL as the failure point. Observed 10-year disease free survival (DFS) for the entire cohort was 70%. In the brachytherapy only group, the observed 10-year DFS was 66%, whereas those patients treated with the addition of external pelvic radiation achieved a DFS of 79%. None of the patients who were followed for the full 12 years failed between Years 10 and 12. Only 25% of the failures observed occurred > 5 years after treatment, thus confirming the durability of brachytherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Prostate brachytherapy provides excellent long term disease control with few late failures reported in the authors' program. The addition of external beam radiation appears to confer survival advantages in selected patients. Using the ASTRO failure criteria for long term follow-up resulted in no significant difference compared with using a PSA failure point of 0.5 ng/mL.     

Comparison of alternative biochemical failure definitions based on clinical outcome in 4839 prostate cancer patients treated by external beam radiotherapy between 1986 and 1995

PURPOSE: To assess the merit of the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) definition of biochemical failure after external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer by testing alternative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) failure definitions against the "gold standard" of clinical failure and to study the effect of backdating the time of failure. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Nine participating institutions agreed to submit follow-up results for all patients with clinically localized prostatic cancer (Stage T1b, T1c, T2, N0M0) treated between 1986 and 1995 by external beam radiotherapy only, to doses of >or=60 Gy, with no androgen deprivation before treatment. A total of 4839 men met the study criteria, with a median follow-up time of 6.3 years. The prediction of clinical failure by 102 definitions of biochemical failure was assessed using various quantitative measures. RESULTS: Four definitions were superior as measured by the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and hazard of clinical failure after biochemical failure: two rises of at least 0.5 ng/mL backdated, PSA level at or greater than the absolute nadir plus 2 ng/mL at the call date, and PSA level at or greater than the current nadir plus 2 or 3 ng/mL at the call date. The absolute nadir was the lowest measured PSA level during all of follow-up, and the current nadir was the lowest PSA measured previous to a particular PSA measurement during follow-up. With the possible exception of patients in the low-risk group, the likelihood of ultimate clinical failure decreased as the time of biochemical failure increased. Failure definitions based on PSA levels >0.2 or 0.5 ng/mL were inferior to other definitions. Backdating the failure time introduced bias into the estimate of freedom from biochemical failure, which was increasingly overestimated at shorter median follow-up times. This bias can be circumvented either by using a failure definition based on the call date or by backdating the censoring times of patients with one or two rises who could potentially have failure at a future (unobserved) time. A short follow-up time as such does not result in bias unless the failures are backdated; in the absence of backdating, it is the precision of failure-free survival that is increasingly compromised as the follow-up time is reduced. CONCLUSION: The ASTRO failure definition ended the confusion resulting from different failure definitions that had been in use, and it did so accurately enough that it is probably not necessary to recalculate previously published results. Nevertheless, for the current pooled analysis of outcome in 4839 men with a 6.3-year median follow-up, other definitions of biochemical failure were superior as assessed by various quantitative measures of concordance of biochemical and ultimate clinical failure. An additional disadvantage of the ASTRO definition is the bias introduced by backdating failures, as well as the necessarily retrospective nature of its application. Some "current" definitions, but not those based on the PSA level rising above a fixed threshold, have significantly higher sensitivity and specificity, do not lead to biased estimations of biochemical disease-free survival, and are directly applicable during patient counseling. These are all issues that would play a role in replacing the ASTRO consensus definition.     

High-dose-rate intensity-modulated brachytherapy with external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer: California endocurietherapy's 10-year results

PURPOSE: To present the long-term outcome and morbidity of high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) combined with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for localized prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between September 1991 and December 1998, 209 consecutive patients with no prior androgen suppression were treated with HDR-BT plus EBRT. The median follow-up was 7.25 years (range, 5-12 years). The patients were stratified into three risk groups: low (Stage T2a or less, Gleason score 20). Four definitions of PSA progression were compared with the general clinical failure outcome: the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) definition, nadir plus 2.0 ng/mL, two consecutive rises >/=0.5 ng/mL, and PSA level >0.2 ng/mL. Morbidity was scored using Radiation Therapy Oncology Group criteria. RESULTS: The general clinical control rate was 90% (188 of 209), and the general clinical failure rate was 10% (21 of 209). The overall survival rate was 79%, and the cause-specific survival rate was 97%. The PSA progression-free survival (ASTRO definition) rate was 90%, 87%, and 69% for the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups, respectively. The nadir plus 2 ng/mL and two rises >/=0.5 definitions correlated better with the actual clinical outcome than did the ASTRO and PSA >0.2 ng/mL definitions. The rate of Grade 3 and 4 late urinary morbidity was 6.7% and 1%, respectively, mostly occurring in patients who had undergone post-RT transurethral prostate resection. No late Grade 3 or 4 rectal morbidity developed. The sexual potency preservation rate was 67%. CONCLUSION: Our 10-year results have demonstrated HDR-BT plus EBRT is a proven treatment for all stages of localized prostate cancer. The morbidity was low, but post-RT transurethral resection should be avoided.     

PSA kinetics after prostate brachytherapy: PSA bounce phenomenon and its implications for PSA doubling time

PURPOSE: To analyze prostate-specific antigen (PSA) kinetics in patients treated with prostate brachytherapy (PI) with a minimum of 5 years of PSA follow-up. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The records of 162 patients treated with PI for localized prostate cancer with a minimum of 5 years of PSA follow-up were reviewed. A variety of pretreatment and posttreatment variables were examined. Patients were coded as having a PSA bounce if their PSA achieved a nadir, elevated at least 0.2 ng/mL greater than that nadir, and decreased to, or below, the initial nadir. Two definitions of biochemical failure (bF) or biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS) were used: the classic American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology consensus definition of three consecutive rises (bF3) and the nadir plus 2 ng/mL definition (bFn+2). Associations between a PSA bounce and the various pre- and posttreatment factors were assessed with logistic regression analysis, and the association between a PSA bounce and bF was examined with the log-rank test. The Mann-Whitney U test was applied to test for differences in the PSA doubling time (PSADT) and the time to a PSA rise between the PSA bounce patients and the bF patients. PSADT was calculated from the nadir to the time of the first PSA rise, because this point is known first in the clinical setting. RESULTS: The 5-year overall bRFS rate was 87% for the bF3 definition and 96% for the bFn+2 definition. A PSA bounce was experienced by 75 patients (46.3%). Patients who experienced a PSA bounce were less likely to have a bF, regardless of the bRFS definition used (bF3: p=0.0015; bFn+2: p=0.0040). Among the pre- and posttreatment factors, only younger age predicted for a PSA bounce on multivariate analysis (p=0.0018). The use of androgen deprivation had no effect on PSA bounce. No difference was found in the PSADT between patients who had a PSA bounce and those with bF. The median PSADT for those with a PSA bounce was 8.3 months vs. 10.3 months using the bF3 definition and 8.8 months using the bFn+2 definition. However, a significant difference was found in the time to the first rise in PSA after PI for patients with a PSA bounce vs. patients with bF. The median time to the first rise in PSA after nadir for those with a PSA bounce was 15.1 months vs. 30.0 months using the bF3 definition (p=0.001) and 22.3 months using the bFn+2 definition (p=0.013). CONCLUSION: Patients experiencing a PSA bounce are more likely to be younger and will have a better bRFS. The PSADT cannot differentiate a PSA bounce from bF. The time to the initial PSA rise after nadir is an excellent discriminator of bF from PSA bounce. The time of the PSA rise after nadir occurs far sooner for a PSA bounce than for bF. This factor should be considered when assessing a patient with a rising PSA level after PI before a patient is administered salvage therapy.     

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) bounce and other fluctuations: which biochemical relapse definition is least prone to PSA false calls? An analysis of 2030 men treated for prostate cancer with external beam or brachytherapy with or without adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy

PURPOSE: To determine the false call (FC) rate for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) relapse according to nine different PSA relapse definitions after a PSA fluctuation (bounce) has occurred after external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) or brachytherapy, with or without adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: An analysis of a prospective database of 2030 patients was conducted. Prostate-specific antigen relapse was scored according to the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO), Vancouver, threshold + n, and nadir + n definitions for the complete data set and then compared against a truncated data set, with data subsequent to the height of the bounce deleted. The FC rate was calculated for each definition. RESULTS: The bounce rate, with this very liberal definition of bounce, was 58% with EBRT and 84% with brachytherapy. The FC rate was lowest with nadir + 2 and + 3 definitions (2.2% and 1.6%, respectively) and greatest with low-threshold and ASTRO definitions (32% and 18%, respectively). The ASTRO definition was particularly susceptible to FC when androgen deprivation therapy was used with radiation (24%). DISCUSSION: New definitions of biochemical non-evidence of disease that are more robust than the ASTRO definition have been identified. Those with the least FC rates are the nadir + 2 and nadir + 3 definitions, both of which are being considered to replace the ASTRO definition by the 2005 meeting of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group-ASTRO consensus panel.     

Assessing the impact of an alternative biochemical failure definition on radiation dose response for high-risk prostate cancer treated with external beam radiotherapy

PURPOSE: The American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) biochemical failure definition has recently been compared with various alternative definitions. We assessed the effect of using an alternative failure definition on the dose-response characteristics of high-risk prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy alone. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This study included 363 high-risk prostate cancer patients treated with external beam radiotherapy alone from 1987 to 1999. These patients have one or more of the following: 1992 American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) digital rectal examination (DRE) stage > or = cT3, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) > 20 ng/mL, and/or biopsy Gleason score > or = 8. We previously reported the dose response based on the ASTRO definition for these patients. In this study, a biochemical failure is defined as a PSA rise > or = 2 ng/mL above the current nadir PSA (CN + 2). The failure date is defined as the time at which the event occurred (i.e., the call date). RESULTS: Using CN + 2, the tumor control probability (TCP) continues to decrease with time as opposed to reaching a plateau as with the ASTRO definition. At 5 years, TCD50 (95% CI), the dose to achieve 50% tumor control, for high-risk prostate cancer, is 70.4 (68.0-72.9) Gy using CN + 2 [ASTRO: 75.5 (70.7-80.2) Gy]. The relative slope, gamma50 (95% CI) is 1.8 (0.8-2.8) [ASTRO: 1.7 (0.7-2.7)]. Recursive partitioning again identified two subgroups: PSA < vs. > or = 13 ng/mL (ASTRO: PSA < or = vs. > 20 ng/mL). The difference in TCD50 between the two subgroups is about 20 Gy at 5 years (ASTRO: about 15 Gy at 5 years). CONCLUSION: This analysis using the CN + 2 failure definition continues to show a dose response for the high-risk group of patients. However, the dose-response characteristics differ from those estimated using the ASTRO definition. We observed that the position (TCD50) and steepness (gamma50) of the dose-response curve changed with time as long as the TCP continued to decrease. This suggests that the dose response characteristics derived from data with longer follow-up may be different from those derived with shorter follow-up using the CN + 2 or similar failure definitions which do not back-date the failure. These changes in dose-response characteristics as well as the time dependence of dose response should be noted when investigators design dose escalation trials for the high-risk prostate cancer patients.