Outcomes of patients treated with capecitabine and temozolamide for advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) and non-PNETs

Background

Retrospective studies have demonstrated high response rates among patients with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) treated with capecitabine and temozolamide (CapTem), while responses are infrequently seen among non-PNETs. The objective of the study was to describe progression free survival (PFS) among neuroendocrine tumor (NET) patients treated with CapTem, and to identify factors associated with better activity.

Methods

Patients who were referred to one of five provincial cancer treatment centers between 2009 and 2013 for advanced NETs and initiated CapTem were included. Patients received Cap 1,500 mg/m² on days 1-14 and TMZ 200 mg/m² on days 10-14 every 28 days. Their characteristics and outcomes were retrospectively analyzed.

Results

In our cohort, 29 patients (16 males) with a median age of 59 (range 26-76) received palliative CapTem, 15 of them as first-line chemotherapy. Primary tumors included pancreas (48.3%), small bowel (20.7%), lung (10.3%), unknown (10.3%), rectum (6.9%) and appendix (3.4%). Median number of cycles was three. Fifteen patients (51.7%) received CapTem as first-line chemotherapy and 14 (48.3%) as subsequent lines. Median PFS for the entire cohort was 4.7 months. PNETs had a median PFS of 4.9 months compared to 2.8 months for non-PNETs (P=0.178). Patients with PNETs who received CapTem in the first-line setting had a median PFS of 15.9 months as compared to only 3.1 months for the remainder [P=0.047, hazard ratios (HR) 0.342]. Patients with Ki67 above 5% and ≤5% had median PFS of 4.0 and 4.7 months, respectively (P=0.260).

Conclusions

CapTem showed good activity among PNETs, but its broader role in the treatment of carcinoid tumors remains unclear.     

Gemcitabine and oxaliplatin combination chemotherapy for metastatic well‐differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas

BACKGROUND:

Beyond the usual regimens based on streptozocin and doxorubicin or 5‐fluorouracil, no second‐line therapy of metastatic neuroendocrine tumor has gained wide acceptance. Gemcitabine and oxaliplatin are generally well tolerated and have shown activity against a wide range of malignancies. The authors assessed the efficacy of gemcitabine‐oxaliplatin combination (GEMOX) in the treatment of patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors.

METHODS:

Twenty consecutive patients with progressive disease were treated with GEMOX, in most cases after failure of other chemotherapy regimens (median = 2). Patients were followed for evidence of toxicity, response, and survival. Two patients were chemotherapy‐naive at treatment initiation and were excluded from the efficacy analysis.

RESULTS:

Toxicity was manageable overall; however, 6 (30%) patients had to discontinue treatment because of oxaliplatin‐induced neurotoxicity (grade 2). Three (17%) of 18 patients had a partial response, median progression‐free survival was 7.0 months, and median overall survival was 23.4 months.

CONCLUSIONS:

Gemcitabine‐oxaliplatin combination shows interesting activity and is well tolerated in pretreated patients with neuroendocrine tumors. Cancer 2009. © 2009 American Cancer Society.     

Multiple primary malignancies in patients with sporadic pancreatic endocrine tumors

BACKGROUND: To investigate the appearance of multiple primary malignancies in patients with sporadic neuroendocrine pancreatic tumors (NEPTs). METHODS: One hundred forty-five patients with NEPTs were treated at the Department of Surgery, Philipps-University Marburg. Multiple primary malignancies included tumors that were not considered to be a metastasis, invasion, or recurrence of NEPTs. Data on sex, age at diagnosis of cancer, follow-up time after diagnosis, and death rate were collected. RESULTS: Of 115 patients with sporadic NEPTs, 15 (13.0%) patients were identified with at least one malignant tumor, other than a NEPT. The median age at diagnosis of the associated tumor(s) was 57 years (range, 10-72 years). Two of the 15 patients had insulinomas, 5 had gastrinomas and 8 had non-functioning NEPTs, respectively. The risk of developing multiple cancers was the highest for patients with gastrinoma (21.7%), followed by patients with non-functioning NFPTs (20.5%). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with NEPTs multiple primary malignancies are found more frequently than in the general population. The etiology of the increased risk of other primaries is not clearly defined, but it may be the result of accumulated growth stimulation by the secreted hormones or a genetic alteration that leads to tumorogenesis in these patients.     

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors G3 and pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas: Differences in basic biology and treatment

In 2017 the World Health Organization revised the criteria for classification of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNENs) after a consensus conference at the International Agency for Research on Cancer. The major change in the new classification was to subclassify the original G3 group into well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors G3 (pNETs G3) and poorly differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas (pNECs), which have been gradually proven to be completely different in biological behavior and clinical manifestations in recent years. In 2019 this major change subsequently extended to NENs involving the entire digestive tract. The updated version of the pNENs grading system marks a growing awareness of these heterogeneous tumors. This review discusses the clinicopathological, genetic and therapeutic features of poorly differentiated pNECs and compare them to those of well-differentiated pNETs G3. For pNETs G3 and pNECs (due to their lower incidence), there are still many problems to be investigated. Previous studies under the new grading classification also need to be reinterpreted. This review summarizes the relevant literature from the perspective of the differences between pNETs G3 and pNECs in order to deepen understanding of these diseases and discuss future research directions.     

卡培他滨联合替莫唑胺治疗晚期胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤的临床观察

  目的  观察卡培他滨联合替莫唑胺治疗晚期胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤（pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm,pNENs）的疗效及不良反应。  方法  回顾性分析2014年2月至2016年10月中日友好医院收治的14例经病理学确诊,分化良好的Ⅳ期pNENs患者,接受口服CAPTEM方案,分析治疗后的无进展生存期（progression free survival,PFS）及不良反应。  结果  14例患者接受定期随访2年余（2014年1月至2016年10月）,1例完全缓解（complete resporse,CR）,1例部分缓解（partial response,PR）,4例疾病稳定（stable disease,SD）,中位无进展生存期（median progression free survival,mPFS）约为8.9（3~24）个月,2年生存率为85.7%（12/14）,其中不良反应均为3级以下的骨髓抑制、消化道反应。  结论  卡培他滨联合替莫唑胺（capecitabine and temozolomide,CAPTEM）方案是治疗晚期胰腺神经内分泌瘤（pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor,pNET）的有效化疗方案,患者耐受性较好。      

Surgery in malignant pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

BACKGROUND: Because of their rarity and indolent nature, optimal management of malignant pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors remains controversial. The purpose of this study is to review a series of patients with these tumors and investigate the role of surgery in the treatment. METHODS: A retrospective study of 73 patients (ages 24-86 years; 36 women) undergoing treatment at a tertiary academic medical center was performed. Patient demographics, diagnostic tests, operations, pathologic findings, adjuvant treatments, and survival were reviewed. RESULTS: Seventy-four percent of patients had advanced disease with hepatic metastases and 30% had functional tumors. Fifty-seven percent of the patients underwent pancreatic resections. Two 60-day mortalities occurred and the postoperative complication rate was 27%. Overall 5-year survival rate was 44%. There was no difference in survival between patients with functional and nonfunctional tumors. Patients undergoing resection, even in metastatic disease, had better survival than patients who had no resection (60% vs. 30%, P = 0.025). Recurrence occurred in 20% of patients who underwent a curative resection. CONCLUSION: Patients with malignant pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors commonly present with advanced disease. Although, curative resection is not frequent, survival benefit may be obtainable with aggressive surgical management even in the face of metastatic disease.     

Multicentre phase II trial of trastuzumab and capecitabine in patients with HER2 overexpressing metastatic pancreatic cancer

Background:

New therapeutic options for metastatic pancreatic cancer are urgently needed. In pancreatic cancer, overexpression of the epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) has been reported in up to 45%. This multicentre phase II study investigated the efficacy and toxicity of the HER2 antibody trastuzumab combined with capecitabine in the patients with pancreatic cancer and HER2 overexpression.

Methods:

Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) after 12 weeks. A total of 212 patients were screened for HER2 expression.

Results:

Immunohistochemical (IHC) HER2 expression was: 83 (40%) grade 0, 71 (34%) grade 1, 31 (15%) grade 2, 22 (11%) grade 3. A total of 17 patients with IHC +3 HER2 expression or gene amplification could be assessed for the treatment response. Grade 3/4 treatment toxicities were: each 7% leucopenia, diarrhoea, nausea and hand-foot syndrome. Progression-free survival after 12 weeks was 23.5%, median overall survival (OS) 6.9 months.

Conclusion:

This study demonstrates +3 HER2 expression or gene amplification in 11% of patients. Contrary to breast and gastric cancer, only 7 out of 11 (64%) patients with IHC +3 HER2 expression showed gene amplification. Although the therapy was well tolerated, PFS and OS did not perform favourably compared with standard chemotherapy. Together, we do not recommend further evaluation of anti-HER2 treatment in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.     

Proliferative rate in endoscopic ultrasound fine‐needle aspiration of pancreatic endocrine tumors

BACKGROUND:

The objectives of this study were to evaluate the role of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)‐guided fine‐needle aspiration (FNA) in the preoperative diagnosis of pancreatic endocrine tumors (PETs) and to investigate whether the Ki‐67 index determined on cytologic material could help predict their behavior.

METHODS:

The study included 10 men and 5 women (ratio of men to women, 2:1) with a mean age of 62.4 years (range, 40‐79 years). Diff‐Quik‐ and Papanicolaou‐stained FNA samples were analyzed retrospectively, and immunocytochemical stains were performed for chromogranin A, synaptophysin, vimentin, α‐1‐antitrypsin, and Ki‐67 on cell block sections. The Ki‐67 index was evaluated by using digital image‐analysis software and was correlated with follow‐up (mean, 21.5 months; range, 2‐43 months).

RESULTS:

The overall survival was rate 86.7% (13 of 15 patients). Seven of 15 patients (46.7%) patients developed lymph node and/or hematogenous metastases. The Ki‐67 index in PETs with no metastases was lower (mean, 6.3%; range, 2%‐13%) than in clinically aggressive (metastatic) tumors (mean, 7.7%; range, 3%‐27%; P = .03). None of the tumors that had a Ki‐67 index ≤2% were metastatic. Both patients who died of disease had a Ki‐67 index of 4%.

CONCLUSIONS:

Although tumors with metastatic potential tended to exhibit a slightly higher Ki‐67 index, there was a significant overlap with nonmetastatic tumors, and PETs that had a very low proliferative rate still could behave aggressively; therefore, the authors concluded that the Ki‐67 index does not predict the risk of disease progression in patients with PETs. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 2009. © 2009 American Cancer Society.     

Phase II clinical trial of capecitabine and gemcitabine chemotherapy in patients with metastatic renal carcinoma

We report a single institution phase II study of gemcitabine 1200 mg m(-2) i.v. on days 1 and 8 and capecitabine 1300 mg m(-2) twice daily on days 1-14 of each 3-week cycle in patients with metastatic renal carcinoma. Patients had a WHO performance status of 0, 1 or 2. Of the 21 enrolled patients, 19 had received prior immunotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy. All had progressive disease at study entry. In all,19 patients had multiple sites of disease. The median duration of metastatic disease was 12.3 months (range 1.2-78.1 months). Three of the 19 evaluable patients achieved a partial response to treatment, with no complete responses, producing an objective overall response rate of 15.8% (95% CI, 3.4-39.6%). The median time to disease progression was 7.6 months, and median overall survival was 14.2 months. Treatment was reasonably well-tolerated, neutropenia being the most frequently observed grade 3 or 4 toxicity, occurring in 57% of patients. Other side effects were consistent with the established toxicity profile of the two drugs, including diarrhoea, palmar-plantar erythema, fatigue, nausea, vomiting and infection. This combination of gemcitabine and capecitabine has modest activity in immunotherapy-refractory metastatic renal carcinoma with manageable toxicity.     

Biweekly high-dose gemcitabine alone or in combination with capecitabine in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a randomized phase II trial.

BACKGROUND: Gemcitabine is an active antitumor agent in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer, and has shown potential synergistic activity with the oral fluoropyrimidine capecitabine in previous phase I/II trials. Based on this background and in order to define the therapeutic potential and tolerance of this combination more precisely, the present randomized multicenter phase II trial was initiated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We prospectively randomized 83 patients to treatment with biweekly gemcitabine 2,200 mg/m(2) given as a 30 min intravenous infusion on day 1, or the same treatment plus oral capecitabine 2,500 mg/m(2) given from days 1 to 7. In both arms, chemotherapy was administered for a duration of 6 months unless there was prior evidence of progressive disease. The efficacy of the two treatment arms was evaluated according to standard criteria, i.e. objective response, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), as well as by analysis of clinical benefit response. RESULTS: The overall objective response rate among the 42 patients treated with gemcitabine alone was 14% compared with 7/41 (17%) among those treated with the combination arm. Similar to response rates, there was no apparent difference between the two groups in terms of median PFS (4.0 versus 5.1 months) and median OS (8.2 versus 9.5 months) in the gemcitabine and combination arm, respectively. Of 61 patients with tumor-related symptoms, who were considered evaluable for clinical benefit response, 10/30 (33%) and 15/31 (48.4%) experienced significant palliation in the gemcitabine and combination arm, respectively. Chemotherapy was well tolerated in both arms with only four versus six patients experiencing WHO grade 3 symptoms. Apart from the occurrence of hand-foot syndrome in 10 patients, no major increase in incidence and/or degree of adverse reactions was noted in the combination arm. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this trial suggest a fairly good therapeutic index for the combination of biweekly high-dose gemcitabine and capecitabine for the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer. Despite a somewhat superior clinical benefit response rate, no advantage over single-agent gemcitabine, however, was noted in terms of objective efficacy parameters.     

First‐line treatment with FOLFOXIRI for advanced pancreatic cancer in clinical practice: Patients' outcome and analysis of prognostic factors

FOLFIRINOX is a standard first‐line treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer (aPC). The Gruppo Oncologico Nord Ovest (GONO) FOLFOXIRI regimen demonstrated efficacy in metastatic colorectal cancer. We aimed to evaluate activity and tolerability of FOLFOXIRI regimen in patients with aPC and to explore putative prognostic factors. One hundred thirty‐seven consecutive aPC patients were treated with FOLFOXIRI in our institution between 2008 and 2014. Clinical, laboratory and pathological data were collected and their association with activity, progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was investigated. After a median follow up of 30 months, median PFS and OS were 8.0 months (95% CI 6.19–9.81) and 12 months (95% CI 9.75–14.25), respectively. Response rate was 38.6%, while disease‐control rate 72.2%. At multivariate analysis liver metastases (p = 0.019; Hazard Ratio, HR, 0.59, 95% Confidence Interval, CI, 0.380.96), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) 1 (p = 0.001; HR 2.26, 95%CI 1.42–3.59) and neutrophil‐lymphocyte ratio (NLR)> 4 (p= 0.002; HR: 2.42; 95% CI 1.38–4.25) were associated with poorer OS. We categorized 119 pts with complete available data as good‐risk (0 factors, 38 pts), intermediate‐risk (1 factor, 49 pts) and poor‐risk (≥2 factors, 32 pts). Median OS for these three groups were 17.6, 11.1 and 7.4 months, respectively (p < 0.001). FOLFOXIRI is active and feasible in aPC. Prognosis of aPC pts treated with FOLFOXIRI is influenced by easily available factors: our analysis revealed ECOG PS, liver metastases and NLR as the most important predictors of survival. These factors could be helpful for treatment decision and clinical trial design.     

Adjuvant chemotherapy in elderly patients with pancreatic cancer

Background:

Adjuvant chemotherapy improves survival for patients with resected pancreatic cancer. Elderly patients are under-represented in Phase III clinical trials, and as a consequence the efficacy of adjuvant therapy in older patients with pancreatic cancer is not clear. We aimed to assess the use and efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in older patients with pancreatic cancer.

Methods:

We assessed a community cohort of 439 patients with a diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who underwent operative resection in centres associated with the Australian Pancreatic Cancer Genome Initiative.

Results:

The median age of the cohort was 67 years. Overall only 47% of all patients received adjuvant therapy. Patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy were predominantly younger, had later stage disease, more lymph node involvement and more evidence of perineural invasion than the group that did not receive adjuvant treatment. Overall, adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with prolonged survival (median 22.1 vs 15.8 months; P<0.0001). Older patients (aged ⩾70) were less likely to receive adjuvant chemotherapy (51.5% vs 29.8% P<0.0001). Older patients had a particularly poor outcome when adjuvant therapy was not delivered (median survival=13.1 months; HR 1.89, 95% CI: 1.27–2.78, P=0.002).

Conclusion:

Patients aged ⩾70 are less likely to receive adjuvant therapy although it is associated with improved outcome. Increased use of adjuvant therapy in older individuals is encouraged as they constitute a large proportion of patients with pancreatic cancer.     

Survivals of patients with surgically treated and High-grade pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas: A comparative study between two American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th tumor-node-metastasis staging systems

Background and objectiveWe aimed to compare the two new defined tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) systems in the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th staging manual for overall survival (OS) analysis of G3 pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas (p-NECs) that are currently proposed for pancreatic exocrine adenocarcinomas (p-EACs) and G1/G2 pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (p-NETs), respectively.MethodsThe data of patients who were surgically treated and histopathologically diagnosed with G3 p-NECs at West China Hospital of Sichuan University from January 2002 to June 2017 were retrospectively analyzed and compared using the two new AJCC staging systems.ResultsApplying the p-EAC AJCC 8th TNM staging system to G3 p-NECs, the estimated 3-year OSs for each stage were 86.7%, 76.0%, 44.5% and 20.7%, respectively (P < 0.001). According to the G1/G2 p-NETs staging system, the estimated OSs at 3 years for each new AJCC stage were 100.0%, 83.6%, 47.1% and 20.7%, respectively (P < 0.001). The system for p-EACs significantly discriminated the survival difference of G3 p-NECs between Stage I and Stage II (P = 0.019), while the other one for G1/G2 p-NETs could not (P = 0.108). The consistent results of Akaike information criteria with Harrell's concordance index indicated that the AJCC 8th staging system for p-EACs was superior when applied to G3 p-NECs for its better prognostic stratification and more accurate prediction ability for OS.ConclusionsOur analysis demonstrated that both TNM systems in the AJCC 8th staging manual were prognostic for patients with G3 p-NECs; however, the classification originally applied to p-EACs was superior and supported its use in clinical practice.     

Phase II study of combination chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer

OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of combination chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. METHODS: Patients na?ve to chemotherapy who had histologically or cytologically confirmed metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma were entered. Gemcitabine was given at a dose of 1000 mg/m2 over 30 min on days 1, 8 and 15, and cisplatin was given at a dose of 80 mg/m2 over 150 min on day 1, in 28-day cycles. RESULTS: A total of 38 patients were enrolled in this study between August 2001 and December 2003. There were no complete responses and 10 partial responses, resulting in an overall response rate of 26% (95% CI: 13.4-43.1%]. Twenty-one patients (55%) had stable disease, whereas 7 (18%) had progressive disease. The median time to progression was 4.2 months and the median overall survival was 7.5 months with a 1-year survival rate of 24%. Grade 3-4 toxicities included neutropenia in 26 patients (68%), thrombocytopenia in 19 (50%), anorexia in 15 (39%) and nausea in nine (24%). There was only one episode of neutropenic fever and there were no significant bleeding episodes or treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSION: The combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin administered by this schedule produced a good response rate associated with moderate but manageable toxicities in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.     

Phase II trial of capecitabine plus nab-paclitaxel in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Background

Combination chemotherapy regimens including fluoropyrimidines as well as albumin-bound paclitaxel have shown promising results in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPC). Based on the recently described excellent therapeutic index of capecitabine plus nab-paclitaxel in metastatic breast cancer, the present phase II trial was initiated.

Methods

Patients with previously untreated mPC were treated with capecitabine (825 mg/m² orally bid on days 1-15) and nab-paclitaxel (125 mg/m² intravenously on days 1 and 8) every 3 weeks. In patients without clinically relevant adverse reactions after the 1st treatment course (≤ grade 2 toxicities according to NCI-CTC vs. 4.0, exuding alopecia and fatigue of any degree) and adequate bone marrow function, the nab-paclitaxel dose was escalated to 100 mg/m² on days 1, 8 and 15 of each cycle; this intra-individual dose escalation was maintained during subsequent treatment courses if tolerated. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) according to RECIST criteria, assessed by an independent radiological review committee with evaluation performed every 2 months.

Results

Between 12/2013 and 01/2015, 30 patients were entered in this monocentric academic phase II trial. All patients had an ECOG performance status of 0-1, 80% had liver metastases and 23% had biliary stents in place at time of study initiation. Median CA19-9 was 1,004 U/mL (0.9-100.000 U/mL). In all patients except 2, a dose escalation of nab-paclitaxel after the 1st treatment course could be accomplished. The most common grade 3 adverse events (AEs) included transient sensory neuropathy (23%), (afebrile) neutropenia (17%), hand-foot-syndrome (13%) and phototoxic skin reaction (10%). Among 29 RECIST-response assessable patients, the ORR was 41.4% and stable disease (SD) was noted in 34.5%, resulting in a disease control rate (DCR) of 76%. After a median follow-up duration of 10.3 months (range, 1.9-19.0 months), 13/30 patients (43.3%) are presently being alive.

Conclusions

The combination of capecitabine + nab-paclitaxel at these doses and scheduling was well tolerated and showed substantial antitumor efficacy.     

Immunobiological effects of gemcitabine and capecitabine combination chemotherapy in advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Background:

Preclinical studies suggest that chemotherapy may enhance the immune response against pancreatic cancer.

Methods:

The levels of granulocyte macrophage-colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) and the associated inflammatory marker C-reactive protein (CRP) were assessed in 38 patients receiving gemcitabine and capecitabine combination chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer within the TeloVac trial. Apoptosis (M30) and total immune response (delayed-type hypersensitivity and/or T-cell response) were also assessed and levels of apoptosis induction correlated with immune response. The telomerase GV1001 vaccine was given either sequentially (n=18) or concomitantly (n=24) with the combination chemotherapy.

Results:

There were no differences between baseline and post-treatment levels of CRP (P=0.19), IL-6 (P=0.19) and GM-CSF (P=0.71). There was a positive correlation between post-chemotherapy CRP and IL-6 levels (r=0.45, P=0.005) and between CRP with carbohydrate antigen-19-9 (CA19-9) levels at baseline (r=0.45, P=0.015) and post treatment (r=0.40, P=0.015). The change in CRP and IL-6 levels was positively correlated (r=0.40, P=0.012). Hazard ratios (95% CI) for baseline CA19-9 (1.30 (1.07–1.59), P=0.009) and CRP (1.55 (1.00–2.39), P=0.049) levels were each independently predictive of survival. The M30 mean matched differences between pre- and post-chemotherapy showed evidence of apoptosis in both the sequential (P=0.058) and concurrent (P=0.0018) chemoimmunotherapy arms. Respectively, 5 of 10 and 9 of 20 patients had a positive immune response but there was no association with apoptosis.

Conclusions:

Combination gemcitabine and capecitabine chemotherapy did not affect circulating levels of GM-CSF, IL-6 and CRP. Chemotherapy-induced apoptosis was not associated with the immunogenicity induced by the GV1001 vaccine in advanced pancreatic cancer.     

5-FU versus combination therapy with tubercidin, streptozotocin, and 5-FU in the treatment of pancreatic carcinomas: COG protocol 7230.

From May 1972 until May 1976, 105 patients were entered on Central Oncology Group protocol 7230 to compare the combination of streptozotocin, tubercidin, and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) versus 5-FU alone in the treatment of adenocarcinoma and islet cell carcinoma of the pancreas. Twenty-nine were not evaluable. Thirty-six evaluable cases received 5-FU, and 40 received the combination, with no significant difference in time to progression or survival. Toxicity in the two regimens was somewhat different but was essentially similar in magnitude. Results indicate no benefit in the treatment of adenocarcinoma of the pancreas with the three-drug combination over 5-FU alone. All of the islet cell tumor patients benefited from the combination by response or arrest of progression of disease. Further study should be directed toward the use of this combination in the treatment of functioning and non-functioning islet cell tumors of the pancreas.     

Maintenance chemotherapy in advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer,a narrative review and case series

Limited data exist on the management of patients with locally advanced (aPC) or metastatic pancreatic (mPC) cancer who achieve stable disease/response after first-line chemotherapy. In this setting, maintenance therapy is important to minimize toxicity while preserving survival benefits. The aim of this study is to conduct a narrative review of the evidence available on the topic and present the results of a retrospective case series of patients with aPC or mPC who received maintenance therapy following a good response to induction chemotherapy. Olaparib is the only drug approved for maintenance therapy in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer and germline Breast Cancer gene mutation. Data from several trials, including the phase II PANOPTIMOX-PRODIGE35 trial, showed clinical benefit from the use of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) as maintenance. We also conducted a case series including 12 patients who received FOLFIRINOX as induction chemotherapy for aPC or mPC followed by fluorouracil (5-FU) or FOLFIRI maintenance therapy. Median progression-free survival is 22.13 months which is higher than that reported in the literature, which ranges between 5 and 10.6 months. Although further conclusions cannot be drawn because of the small sample size, the results are promising and encourage further exploration of this topic in larger prospective trials.     

多西紫杉醇联合卡培他滨治疗蒽环类耐药的转移性乳腺癌

目的 观察多西紫杉醇联合卡培他滨(DC方案)治疗蒽环类耐药的晚期乳腺癌的疗效和安全性.方法 选择32例葸环类耐药的转移性乳腺癌患者,给予DC方案化疗.根据WHO制定的实体瘤客观疗效评价标准和抗癌药物毒性分级(0～Ⅳ)标准评价疗效和不良反应.结果 32例患者共完成126个周期化疗,每例患者的化疗周期数为2～12个,中位化疗周期数4个.完全缓解(CR)1例,部分缓解(PR)14例,稳定(SD)11例,进展(PD)6例,总有效率为46.9%.14例肺转移患者中8例有效,13例肝转移患者中6例有效,7例皮肤软组织转移患者中3例有效,5例淋巴结转移患者中3例有效.32例患者的中位肿瘤进展时间(TTP)为5.6个月.1年生存率为56.3%.主要不良反应为骨髓抑制、手足综合征、恶心、呕吐、腹泻、口腔黏膜炎等,84.4%的患者出现中性粒细胞下降,2例达Ⅳ度骨髓抑制.结论 DC方案治疗转移性乳腺癌的有效率高,不良反应可以耐受,是治疗对蒽环类耐药转移性乳腺癌的有效方案.