Value of continued efforts at limb salvage despite multiple graft failures

Treatment of patients with limb-threatening ischemia after multiple failed bypasses remains difficult and controversial. Further revascularization procedures despite failure of the original procedure may be viewed as futile. The purpose of this report is to determine the efficacy of third or fourth revascularization procedures after the original and second procedures fail. Over a 10-year period from January 1, 1983, to December 31, 1992, 312 infrainguinal bypasses were performed on 271 consecutive patients for foot salvage. The overall limb salvage rate was 84%, and the operative mortality rate was 3.7% (10 patients). Sixteen patients (5.8%) had repeat infrainguinal bypasses performed after failure of two or more prior bypass procedures in the same leg. Twenty-three reconstructions were performed in these 16 patients. There were no operative deaths. One half of these patients had major amputations performed within the first year following their tertiary or fourth reconstructive procedure. Sixty-two percent of patients have survived longer than 3 years after their third or fourth procedure. One half of these patients have maintained graft patency and an excellent quality of life. Only 22% of the patients requiring amputation ambulated wth a prosthesis, whereas all revascularized patients ambulated. Although this subset of patients is known to have an increased risk of repeated graft failure and limb loss, we believe continued efforts at limb salvage despite multiple previous graft failures is justified.     

The relative importance of graft surveillance and warfarin therapy in infrainguinal prosthetic bypass failure

BACKGROUND: We sought to describe modes of failure and associated limb loss after infrainguinal polytetrafluoroethylene bypass grafting in patients lacking a saphenous venous conduit and to define specific clinical or hemodynamic factors prognostic for bypass failure. METHODS: We identified 121 patients (mean age, 67 years; 90 men and 31 women) with determinable outcomes (minimum follow-up, 2 months; mean, 17 months) after 130 prosthetic infrainguinal bypasses between 1997 and 2005. Ischemic presentation was rest pain in 52%, tissue loss in 34%, and disabling claudication and/or popliteal aneurysm in 14%, with 24% of patients requiring a redo bypass. Distal targets were the above-knee (n = 44), distal popliteal (n = 27), or tibial/pedal (n = 59) arteries. Sixty-six (77%) of the below-knee (BK) target (distal popliteal or tibial) bypasses had distal anastomotic adjuncts (vein cuff or patch). Duplex graft surveillance was performed at 1, 4, and 7 months after surgery and twice yearly thereafter, with recording of midgraft velocities and imaging encompassing inflow and outflow vessels. Arteriography and open/endovascular intervention was performed for stenoses identified by duplex scanning (peak systolic velocity >300 cm/s; velocity ratio >3.5). An attempt was made to salvage occluded grafts by using catheter-directed thrombolysis or open techniques. Eighty-six patients (74% of BK bypasses) were placed on chronic warfarin therapy with a target international normalized ratio range between 2 and 3. Prognostic factors were identified by using univariate statistics and multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Three-year primary, assisted, and secondary patency rates were 39%, 43%, and 59%, respectively, for all bypasses, with no difference noted between above-knee and BK grafts (P = .5). At 3 years, freedom from limb loss was 75%, and patient survival was only 70%, with no adverse effect on survival imparted by amputation. Sixty-nine total adverse events occurred as a result of thrombotic occlusion (n = 51), duplex scan-detected stenosis (n = 13), or graft infection (n = 5). Forty-nine percent of all initial graft occlusions eventually led to amputation. Twenty-three grafts (27% of 86 patients) in patients maintained on chronic warfarin were subtherapeutic at the time of occlusion. Use of a distal anastomotic adjunct with BK bypasses reduced graft thrombosis (35% with vs 60% without) but did not impart a significant patency advantage (P = .07). Multivariate analysis revealed low graft flow (midgraft velocity < or =45 cm/s; odds ratio [OR], 6.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.9-19.2), use of warfarin (OR, 8.4; 95% CI, 2.1-34.5), and therapeutic warfarin (OR, 24.6; 95% CI, 5.7-106) to be independently predictive for bypass patency. Graft patency was maintained in 89% of grafts remaining therapeutic on warfarin compared with only 55% of subtherapeutic or nonanticoagulated grafts (P < .001). Low-flow grafts (n = 61) occluded more frequently than higher-flow grafts (46% vs 13%; P < .001). Therapeutic warfarin augmented the patency of low-flow (P < .001) but not high-flow (P = .15) grafts. CONCLUSIONS: Low graft flow was a more common mode of prosthetic bypass failure than development of duplex scan-detected stenotic lesions during follow-up. Early duplex scanning may be more important for characterizing midgraft velocity and related thrombotic potential and selecting patients for chronic anticoagulation. Maintenance of therapeutic warfarin is paramount in optimizing prosthetic bypass patency and limb preservation.     

Comparative analysis of autogenous infrainguinal bypass grafts in African Americans and Caucasians: the association of race with graft function and limb salvage

OBJECTIVE: African Americans (AAs) are at risk for developing diabetes mellitus and atherosclerosis. Whether race influences the results of infrainguinal arterial reconstruction is unclear. The purpose of this study was to compare the results of autogenous infrainguinal bypasses in AAs and Caucasians to determine the association of race with graft function and limb salvage. METHODS: This was a retrospective, comparative cohort study of AA and Caucasian patients who had undergone autogenous infrainguinal bypass surgery. Only single-limb bypasses in each patient cohort were considered in this analysis. In patients who had undergone bilateral lower limb bypasses, the first limb bypass was chosen as the index bypass procedure. RESULTS: From January 1985 to December 2003, 1459 autogenous infrainguinal bypasses were performed in 1459 patients for lower limb ischemia. Within this group, 89 AA patients/vein grafts formed the study cohort. The control group comprised 1370 Caucasian patients/vein grafts. Compared with the Caucasian cohort, AA patients were significantly younger (median age, 65 vs 70 years, respectively; P = .001) and predominantly female (57% vs 41%, respectively; P = .002). AA patients also had a higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus, hypertension, cerebrovascular disease, congestive heart failure, and dialysis-dependent renal failure. More AA than Caucasian patients presented with gangrene (34% vs 16%, respectively; P = .001), and more underwent bypass surgery for limb salvage indications (91% vs 81%, respectively; P = .01). The venous conduit used was predominantly the greater saphenous vein (AA, 83%; Caucasian, 85%), and the site of distal anastomosis was at the tibial/pedal level in 67% of AA and 61% of Caucasian patients. Overall morbidity (AA, 28%; Caucasian, 23%) and 30-day mortality (AA, 3%; Caucasian, 3%) were similar. Thirty-day graft failure was significantly greater in AAs than Caucasians (12% vs 5%, respectively; P = .003). The overall 5-year primary graft patency (+/-SE) was significantly worse in AA patients (AA, 52% +/- 6%; Caucasian, 67% +/- 2%; P = .009). The 5-year limb salvage rate (+/-SE) was also significantly worse in AA patients (AA, 81% +/- 5%; Caucasian, 90% +/- 1%; P = .04). With the Cox proportional hazard model, significant risk factors associated with primary graft failure were AA race, age younger than 65 years, female sex, secondary reconstructions, tibial bypasses, and critical limb ischemia. Significant risk factors associated with limb loss were age younger than 65 years, female sex, absence of coronary disease, presence of critical limb ischemia, and secondary reconstructions. CONCLUSIONS: Autogenous infrainguinal bypass surgery in AAs is associated with poorer primary graft patency and limb salvage rates compared with those of Caucasians. This may partially account for the higher rate of limb loss in AA patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease.     

Limb salvage after infrainguinal bypass graft failure

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the outcome of patients in whom an infrainguinal bypass graft failed. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients undergoing infrainguinal bypass grafting in a single institution over 8 years. RESULTS: Six hundred thirty-one infrainguinal bypass grafts were placed in 578 limbs in 503 patients during the study period. The indication for surgery was limb-threatening ischemia in 533 patients (85%); nonautologous conduits were used in 259 patients (41%), and 144 (23%) were repeat operations. After a mean follow-up of 28 +/- 1 months (median, 23 months; range, 0-99 months), 167 grafts (26%) had failed secondarily. The rate of limb salvage in patients with graft failure was poor, only 50% +/- 5% at 2 years after failure. The 2-year limb salvage rate depended on the initial indication for bypass grafting: 100% in patients with claudication (n = 16), 55% +/- 8% in patients with rest pain (n = 49), and 34% +/- 6% in patients with tissue loss (n = 73; P <.001). The prospect for limb salvage also depended on the duration that the graft remained patent. Early graft failure (<30 days; n = 25) carried a poor prognosis, with 2-year limb salvage of only 25% +/- 10%; limb salvage was 53% +/- 5% after intermediate graft failure (<2 years, n = 110) and 79% +/- 10% after late failure (>2 years, n = 15; P =.04). Multivariate analysis revealed shorter patency interval before failure (P =.006), use of warfarin sodium (Coumadin) postoperatively (P =.006), and infrapopliteal distal anastomosis (P =.01) as significant predictors for ultimate limb loss. CONCLUSION: The overall prognosis for limb salvage in patients with failed infrainguinal bypass grafts is poor, particularly in patients with grafts placed because of tissue loss and those with early graft failure.     

Autogenous composite vein bypass graft for infrainguinal arterial reconstruction

PURPOSE: Lower extremity arterial reconstruction in the absence of adequate greater saphenous vein remains a challenging problem in contemporary vascular practice. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the long-term results of autogenous composite vein grafts used for infrainguinal arterial bypass grafting. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated a prospective vascular registry and reviewed inpatient and office records. RESULTS: From June 1983 to September 1999, 165 autogenous composite vein infrainguinal bypass grafts were performed in 154 patients (87 men, 67 women; mean age, 69 years). The mean follow-up was 25 months (range, 3-147). Patients had the usual risk factors, including a 30% incidence of prior coronary bypass grafting. Forty-eight percent of bypass grafts were performed after failed previous reconstructions, and 90% were performed for limb salvage. The conduits were comprised of 2 segments (75%), 3 segments (23%), and 4 segments (2%). The distal anastomosis was at the popliteal level in 17% and the tibial/pedal level in 83%. The 30-day operative mortality rate was 1.8%. Perioperative graft failure (< 30 days) occurred in 18 bypass grafts (11%), resulting in early amputation (< 30 days) in 1.2%. The overall 5-year cumulative patency rates were 44% +/- 5% for primary patency, 63% +/- 5% for primary-assisted patency (PAP), and 65% +/- 5% for secondary patency (SP). A high revision rate for stenosis or thrombosis was required during follow-up to maintain patency of the grafts (27%). Limb salvage was 81% +/- 5% at 5 years. Primary reconstructions with composite vein fared significantly better than secondary reconstructions (SP 76% vs 54% at 5 years, P <.01). Arm vein composites showed superior patency compared with greater saphenous vein composites (SP 79% vs 61% at 5 years, P <.05). CONCLUSIONS: Infrainguinal reconstruction with autogenous composite vein results in durable graft patency and limb salvage rates in patients with few alternatives for revascularization. Intensive graft surveillance with aggressive graft revision is necessary to achieve these results.     

Infrainguinal bypass grafting in patients with end-stage renal disease and critical limb ischaemia: is it worthwhile?

Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) constitute an increasing proportion of patients undergoing infrainguinal bypass surgery for critical limb ischaemia (CLI). The aim of this retrospective study was to determine graft patency, healing of pedal lesions, limb salvage and survival following infrainguinal arterial reconstruction in this high-risk subset of patients. 34 patients with ESRD undergoing 37 bypass procedures for CLI (rest pain 2; tissue loss 35) were identified from the vascular registry. These included 13 femoropopliteal and 24 femorotibial bypasses with autogenous (67.6%) or prosthetic (32.4%) materials. The median age in this series was 62 years and 79% were diabetics. Using life-table analysis, the cumulative primary patency rate was 88% at 1 month and 81% at 2 years. The resulting limb salvage rate amounted to 94 and 86% at 1 month and 2 years, respectively. Healing of the pedal lesions was accomplished in only 50% of patients at 6 months. Toe lesions could be treated more successfully than forefoot and deep heel defects (p = 0.04). With a perioperative mortality of 3/37 cumulative survival rate declined to 21% at 2 years. Late mortality correlated significantly with a history of previous myocardial infarction or congestive heart failure (p = 0.001). Infrainguinal revascularisation can be performed in dialysis-dependent patients with acceptable patency and limb salvage rates. However, bypass grafting should be mainly reserved to patients without severe cardiac disease and to those without extensive tissue loss.     

Outcome of surgical and endoluminal intervention for infrainguinal bypass anastomotic strictures

The objective of this study was to compare the outcomes of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) versus open surgical repair of anastomotic strictures affecting infrainguinal bypasses. Anastomotic strictures affecting 39 bypasses in 36 patients were identified among 593 consecutive infrainguinal arterial reconstructions performed between 1994 and 2004. The mean age of affected patients was 65 +/- 2 years (range: 61 to 101 years). The original bypasses, with vein grafts outnumbering prosthetic grafts 2 to 1, were performed for acute (5%) and chronic (54%) limb-threatening ischemia, disabling claudication (28%), or popliteal aneurysms (13%). Anastomotic strictures were first recognized an average of 16 +/- 3 months (range 2 to 92 months) postoperatively. Strictures affected the distal anastomosis in 62% of cases and the proximal anastomosis in 38%. Primary patency, assisted primary patency, secondary patency, and limb salvage were assessed following PTA or open surgical repair of the strictures. Anastomotic strictures were detected following acute (41%) and chronic (18%) limb-threatening ischemia, claudication (13%), or during routine graft surveillance (28%) in asymptomatic patients. Graft thrombosis, occurring in 51% of patients at the time of presentation, was not affected by the site of anastomotic stricture, although prosthetic grafts were affected more than vein grafts (92% vs 31%). Interventions included PTA (67%) and conventional open procedures (33%). The latter included vein patch angioplasty, short interposition grafts, and redo bypasses. The stricture site and bypass material used in the original revascularization did not affect reintervention patency rates. Sixteen (62%) of the endovascular procedures were performed on a graft presenting with thrombosis, while only 4 (31%) were initially treated with operative therapy. Treatment of thrombosed grafts resulted in an 18-month patency of 32% compared to an 80% patency in treating grafts that were not occluded at the time of presentation (p < 0.05). No anastomotic stricture repaired operatively required reintervention, whereas 42% of those treated by PTA required a mean of 1.3 additional reinterventions (p < 0.03). Anastomotic strictures affecting infrainguinal bypass grafts contribute to low patency rates. Outcomes can be significantly improved if these strictures are identified before graft thrombosis. Open surgical repair, compared to PTA, provides improved graft function as evident by fewer subsequent interventions required to maintain graft patency.     

Infrainguinal arterial reconstruction for claudication: Is it worth the risk? An analysis of 409 procedures

Purpose: Infrainguinal reconstruction traditionally has been reserved for patients with limb-threatening ischemia. Surgery for debilitating claudication, however, has been discouraged as a result of the perceived fear of bypass graft failure, limb loss, and significant perioperative complications that may be worse than the natural history of the disease. In this study, the results of infrainguinal reconstructions for claudication performed during the past 10 years were evaluated for bypass graft patency, limb loss, and long-term survival rates. Methods: Data were collected and reviewed from the vascular registry, the office charts, and the hospital records for patients who underwent infrainguinal bypass grafting for claudication. Results: From 1987 to 1997, 409 infrainguinal reconstructions were performed for claudication (9% of all infrainguinal reconstructions in our unit). The patient population had the following demographics: 73% men, 28% with diabetes, 54% smokers, and an average age of 64 years (range, 24 to 91 years). Inflow was from the following arteries: iliac artery/graft, 10%; common femoral artery, 52%; superficial femoral artery, 19%; profunda femoris artery, 16%; and popliteal artery, 2%. The outflow vessels were the following arteries: 165 above-knee popliteal arteries (40%), 150 below-knee popliteal arteries (37%), and 94 tibial vessels (23%). The operative mortality rate was 0%, and one limb was lost in the series from distal embolization. The primary patency rates were 62%, 77%, and 86% for above-knee popliteal artery, below-knee popliteal artery, and tibial vessel reconstructions at 4 years, and the secondary patency rates were 64%, 81%, and 90%, respectively. Cumulative patient survival rates were 93% and 80% at 4 and 6 years as compared with 65% and 52%, respectively, for infrainguinal reconstructions performed for limb salvage. Conclusion: Infrainguinal arterial reconstruction for disabling claudication is a safe and durable procedure in selected patients. These data indicate that concern for limb loss, death, and limited life span of the patients with this disease may not be warranted. (J Vasc Surg 1999;29:259-69.)     

The value of vein graft surveillance in bypasses performed with small-diameter vein grafts

We assessed the impact of preoperative diameter of the venous conduit on reintervention rate and outcome following infrainguinal vein graft bypass. Consecutive infrainguinal vein bypasses between January 2001 and December 2006 were reviewed. All patients underwent preoperative measurement of vein graft diameter (VGD). Grafts were classified into those with VGD <3.5 mm and those with VGD > or =3.5 mm. All patients were enrolled in a duplex surveillance program. The association between VGD and reintervention rate was assessed. Graft patency and amputation rates were compared. There were 377 bypasses followed up for a median of 23 months (range 8-67). VGD was <3.5 mm in 139 grafts (36.9%) and > or =3.5 mm in 238 grafts (63.1%). A higher proportion of smaller vein grafts (32.3%) required reintervention to maintain graft patency compared with larger conduits (20.2%) (chi(2) = 7.7, p < 0.001). VGD (odds ratio [OR] = 2.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.63-3.81; p < 0.001), smoking (OR = 1.83, 95% CI 1.39-3.20; p = 0.02), and type of bypass (OR = 1.86, 95% CI 1.49-2.47; p = 0.02) were variables associated with higher reintervention rate. There was no difference in graft patency (p = 0.13) or amputation rates (p = 0.35) between the two groups. Use of smaller vein grafts was associated with a higher reintervention rate. Provided that these grafts are surveyed and where necessary repaired, the use of smaller vein grafts is successful and expands the availability of autogenous conduit for infrainguinal arterial reconstruction.     

Functional failure of patent femorodistal in situ grafts

We have treated several patients who required major, proximal extremity amputations despite a patent infrainguinal in situ saphenous vein bypass graft. To determine those factors predisposing to such paradoxical limb loss, we studied a group of 45 patients who underwent 48 in situ, femorodistal bypass grafts for tissue necrosis and who maintained a patent graft throughout the perioperative period. Within this cohort, we compared two distinct subgroups: Group I, whose limbs (n = 8) ultimately required a major proximal amputation; Group II, whose limbs (n = 40) emerged with a viable foot and did not require a major amputation. There was no significant difference in the incidence of diabetes, renal failure, smoking, or postoperative ankle/brachial index between the two groups. The presence of gangrene (88% vs 45%), invasive sepsis (63% vs 23%), and combined gangrene and sepsis (63% vs 18%) was significantly (p less than 0.05) more prevalent in Group I versus Group II. Forty-three percent of patients with both gangrene and foot sepsis required a major proximal amputation despite a patent graft. Such patients are at high risk for limb loss even if they undergo successful revascularization.     

The use of arm veins for infrainguinal bypass in end-stage peripheral vascular disease

Thirty-six infrainguinal bypass grafts were performed in 33 patients with the use of autologous arm vein. Indications for operation were ischemic rest pain or tissue loss in all patients. The average age of the patients was 70.0 years-27% were diabetic and 66% were smokers. Sixty-five percent of the grafts were performed as secondary reconstructions. Follow-up ranged from three weeks to six years, with a mean of 12.1 months. Life-table primary and secondary patencies for all grafts are 73% and 82% at one year, respectively. Simple (noncomposite) arm vein grafts had primary and secondary patencies of 75% and 85%, respectively. The limb salvage rate was 86%. No grafts required thrombectomy for early occlusion (less than 30 days), and no graft failures have occurred beyond nine months (n = 18). Arm vein bypass grafts demonstrate excellent patency rates and provide the preferred conduit in the absence of autologous saphenous vein.     

Infrainguinal arterial reconstructions with vein grafts in patients with prior aortic procedures: the influence of aneurysm and occlusive disease

PURPOSE: This study assessed whether infrainguinal reconstructions with autogenous vein (IR) performed in patients with prior abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repairs have altered graft patency, compared with those in patients who have undergone prior aortobifemoral bypass grafting procedures (ABF) for aortoiliac occlusive disease. METHODS: From 1979 to 1998, 54 patients with prior aortic reconstructions underwent 64 autogenous single-segment saphenous IRs solely for infrainguinal occlusive disease. Included in this cohort were 30 IRs with an earlier AAA repair and 34 IRs with an earlier ABF repair. During the same period, 1274 patients underwent 1642 autogenous vein lower-extremity bypass grafting procedures (LEB). Lower-extremity native arterial (AAA, n = 6; ABF, n = 11) and vein graft diameters (AAA, n = 6; ABF, n = 6) were determined by means of angiography and duplex ultrasonography, respectively. The three reconstruction groups (AAA, ABF, LEB) were compared. RESULTS: The patients in the three groups were similar in sex, indication for operation, proximal and distal anastomotic site, and number of distal runoff vessels. The cumulative 5-year primary graft patency rate in the AAA group (92% +/- 5%) was significantly higher (P <. 001) than that in the LEB group (63% +/- 2%) and the ABF group (44% +/- 11%). Furthermore, cumulative 5-year primary patency was decreased in the ABF group compared with the LEB group (P =.05). A significant increase in both native arterial (P =.001) and vein graft diameter (P <.05) was demonstrated by using linear regression and a Student t test, respectively, in the AAA group compared with the ABF group. CONCLUSION: These data demonstrate that, compared with those in patients without a previous aortic procedure, IRs in patients with prior AAA repairs have significantly improved graft patency, and IRs in patients with prior ABF reconstructions for aortoiliac occlusive disease have significantly decreased graft patency. Larger arterial diameter and altered vein graft adaptation may contribute to the superior long-term outcomes of IRs in patients with prior AAA repairs.     

Infrainguinal reconstruction with arm vein,lesser saphenous vein,and remnants of greater saphenous vein: A report of 257 cases

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results of infrainguinal reconstructions with arm vein, lesser saphenous vein, and remnants of greater saphenous vein (ectopic vein grafts). Methods: The records of 222 patients who underwent 257 bypasses were retrospectively reviewed. Most of the grafts were placed for rest pain or tissue loss (88%) and were secondary reconstructions (70%) to the infrapopliteal level (90%). Single-length vein grafts were constructed in 66% of cases, whereas 34% were composite vein grafts. Results: Secondary graft patency was 70%, 52%, and 43% at 1, 3, and 5 years. Single-length grafts had significantly better patency rates at all intervals: 78% versus 56% at 1 year (p = 0.001), 60% versus 39% at 3 years (p = 0.004), and 52% versus 29% at 5 years (p = 0.002). The limb salvage rate was 69% at 5 years. Conclusions: Ectopic vein grafts with primarily arm vein are an acceptable alternative for infrainguinal reconstruction in the absence of suitable ipsilateral greater saphenous vein. (J VASC SURG 1994;20:451-7.)     

Late results of peripheral vascular surgery in patients 80 years of age and older

During a seven-year period, 114 patients 80 years of age and older underwent 119 peripheral arterial procedures. There were 26 elective aortic reconstructions, nine ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repairs, 33 femoropopliteal bypasses, 13 femorotibial bypasses, 21 femoral embolectomies, and 17 miscellaneous procedures. Early mortality, morbidity, and Goldman cardiac risk factors were determined by chart review. All 48 survivors returned for current noninvasive vascular examination and life-style assessment. Perioperative mortality after elective AAA resection was 4.3%, vs 78% after ruptured AAA. Perioperative mortality after infrainguinal bypass was nil. Five-year survivals after elective aortic and infrainguinal reconstructions were 54% and 30%, respectively. Of 18 patients studied 19 to 68 months after infrainguinal bypass, limb salvage was achieved in 83% and graft patency in 76%. Thirty-one long-term survivors (65%) were living at home. Only seven patients (15%) were confined to a wheelchair or were bedridden, and 28 (58%) were fully ambulatory. Peripheral arterial reconstruction in patients 80 years of age and older can be performed safely with excellent long-term survival and quality of life.     

Femoroperoneal bypass: evaluation of potential for revascularization of the severely ischemic lower extremity.

In 79 patients in whom distal small vessel bypass with autogenous vein was used for revascularization because of gangrene, gangrenous ulceration or rest pain, 14 had femoroperoneal bypasses. Femorotibial or femoroperoneal bypasses were performed in those patients in whom no popliteal runoff was present on pre-operative arteriogram. Femoroperoneal bypass was performed in preference to primary amputation in each case. Nine of 14 (64.3%) of femoroperoneal bypasses were functional whereas 57 of 79 (72.2%) of total distal bypasses to small vessels were functional. Salvage of severely ischemic lower extremities was achieved in 5 of 14 (35.7%) patients after femoroperoneal bypass and in 46 of 65 (70.8%) patients after bypass to anterior tibial or posterior tibial arteries. Graft patency without limb salvage occurred in 4 of 9 (44.4%) patients with patent femoroperoneal bypasses and in only 2 of 48 (4.2%) of patients with femorotibial bypass. Although limb salvage rate is considerably less with femoroperoneal than femorotibial or femoropopliteal bypass, attempted limb revascularization by peroneal bypasses is preferable to primary amputation in patients with rest pain, gangrenous ulceration or gangrene.     

Redo Infrainguinal Bypass: Factors Predicting Patency and Limb Salvage

The increased complexity of redo infrainguinal bypass procedures can result in prolonged operative time and increased morbidity. This review was undertaken to compare outcomes from primary and redo bypass procedures and to identify factors predictive of graft failure and limb loss after redo bypass. All infrainguinal bypasses (n = 468) from 1995 to 1999 were reviewed. A total of 367 primary bypasses in 317 patients were compared to 101 redo grafts in 84 patients with previously failed bypasses. Risk factors and types of procedures were compared using Students t-test and the ² test. Patency and limb salvage were compared using life-table analysis. Patients requiring redo bypasses were less likely to have diabetes and end-stage renal disease. Two-year patency (66 ± 4% primary vs. 55 ± 7% redo, p = 0.13) and limb salvage (75 ± 3% primary vs. 72 ± 6% secondary, p = 0.43) were comparable between primary and redo bypass groups. Female gender was predictive of redo graft failure (2-year patency 73 ± 8% male vs. 39 ± 9% female, p = 0.01). Clinical indications that predicted failure of a redo bypass included thrombosis of an autologous graft (1-year patency 71 ± 7% previous prosthetic vs. 49 ± 10% previous autologous, p = 0.004), thrombosis of an infrageniculate bypass (2-year patency 65 ± 10% suprageniculate vs. 46 ± 9% infrageniculate, p = 0.044), and a limb salvage indication for the primary operation (2-year patency 86 ± 9% claudication vs. 44 ± 8% limb salvage, p = 0.008). When a primary bypass fails despite the use of optimal conduit (autologous vein) and an infrageniculate target vessel, the redo bypass has a higher risk of failure, particularly in female patients. Nonetheless, patency and limb salvage rates justify an attempt at revascularization after failed primary bypass. Presented at the 25th Annual Meeting of the Midwestern Vascular Surgical Society, Chicago, IL, September 21, 2001.     

Unilateral aortofemoral bypass: a safe and effective option for the treatment of unilateral limb-threatening ischemia

To determine whether unilateral aortofemoral (AUF) bypass is a safe and effective option for the treatment of unilateral limb-threatening ischemia in patients with aortic or bilateral iliac occlusive disease, we reviewed the results of 42 AUF bypasses performed using polytetrafluoroethylene grafts in patients operated on for limb salvage; 11 (26%) of the patients also underwent femoropopliteal or femorodistal (FP/D) bypasses. The indications for surgery were tissue necrosis or ulceration in 18 (43%) patients and rest pain in 17 (40%) patients. The 5-year primary graft patency and limb salvage rates for AUF bypass were 74% and 84%, respectively. The perioperative mortality rate was 5%. There were no significant differences in the primary graft patency or limb salvage rates in patients who underwent AUF bypass with or without FP/D bypass. Only 3 of 41 (7%) AUF bypass patients required subsequent femorofemoral bypass. We conclude that: (1) AUF bypass is a safe and effective surgical option in patients with unilateral limb-threatening ischemia and aortic or bilateral iliac occlusive disease; (2) the routine performance of an aortobifemoral or axillobifemoral bypass in patients with unilateral limb-threatening ischemia may be unnecessary; and (3) AUF bypass facilitates the combined inflow and infrainguinal operations that are frequently required for limb salvage in these patients.     

Adjuncts to improve patency of infrainguinal prosthetic bypass grafts

The superiority of autologous venous conduit for infrainguinal arterial bypass has been well documented, especially when the bypass extends below the knee or to the tibial arteries. Nevertheless, when adequate autologous vein is not available, prosthetic bypasses (eg, polytetrafluoroethylene [PTFE] or Dacron) are often used in limb-salvage situations. The inferior long-term patency of these infrainguinal prosthetic bypasses has been documented by a number of studies. One such study reported a prospective multicenter randomized trial with only a 12% primary patency for infrapopliteal prosthetic bypasses after 4 years. Another study reported a similar experience with infragenicular bypasses with PTFE for limb salvage even for above-knee (27%, 5 year) and below-knee (25%, 5 year) femoral-popliteal bypasses. The reported PTFE graft patency was consistently inferior to that achieved with autologous vein for limb salvage. Dacron grafts appear to have similar patency rates to PTFE. In an attempt to improve prosthetic graft patency, a number of surgical and medical adjuncts have been developed. In this review, the authors discuss these adjuncts and their impact on infrainguinal prosthetic graft patency.     

Natural history of infrainguinal vein graft stenosis relative to bypass grafting technique

Purpose: To determine whether the incidence of vein graft stenosis is related to bypass grafting technique and thus modification of postoperative surveillance protocols may be required.Methods: From 1991 to 1996, 338 infrainguinal vein bypasses constructed using in situ (n = 131), reversed (n = 120), nonreversed translocated (n = 48), or spliced/upper extremity vein (n = 39) grafting techniques were evaluated by intraoperative duplex scanning to optimize bypass construction and serially thereafter to detect developing vein graft stenoses. Bypass procedures were performed in 322 patients for critical limb ischemia (83%), claudication (13%), or popliteal aneurysm (4%). Using life-table analysis, graft patency and revision/failure rates were compared relative to grafting technique, need for operative revision, and intraoperative duplex scan results.Results: Three-year primary and secondary graft patency rates were higher (p < 0.001) for in situ bypass grafts (85%/97%) compared with reversed (57%/83%), nonreversed translocated (62%/78%), or alternative (51%/76%) vein bypass grafts. During a mean follow-up interval of 19 months, the incidence of graft revision was higher for reversed saphenous (23%) and alternative (28%) vein bypass grafts compared with in situ (10%) or nonreversed (16%) saphenous vein bypass grafts. Despite a normal intraoperative graft duplex scan, the revision/failure rate of reversed vein grafts was 2.5 times greater than in situ/nonreversed translocated vein conduits (primary patency rate at 3 years, 60% vs 87%, p = 0.009). Bypass grafts modified at operation on the basis of duplex scanning were two times more likely to require postoperative revision than grafts with normal intraoperative scans.Conclusions: The incidence of postoperative graft stenosis and need for revision varies with bypass grafting technique. Reversed vein bypasses and grafts modified at operation may be more prone than in situ vein bypass grafts to develop stenosis and thus require intensive surveillance. Infrainguinal vein graft failure and the need for revision may be reduced by the adoption of bypass grafting techniques that include valve lysis and intraoperative duplex scan assessment. (J Vasc Surg 1997;25:211-25.)     

Infrainguinal vein graft stenosis: cutting balloon angioplasty as the first-line treatment of choice

OBJECTIVE: The optimal treatment for hemodynamically significant infrainguinal vein bypass graft stenosis is not known. This study compares three options as first choice for the revision of failing infrainguinal vein grafts: cutting balloon angioplasty (CBA), standard percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty (PTA), and open surgical revision (OS). METHODS: Infrainguinal vein bypass graft lesions treated in a single institution during a 12-year period were evaluated. Of these, 161 lesions in 124 infrainguinal bypasses (101 patients) were treated with OS (n = 42), PTA (n = 57), or CBA (n = 62). The initial indication for the bypass in these patients was limb salvage in 73% and claudication in 27%. The primary outcome of interest was the development of vein graft occlusion or significant stenosis (>or=70%) as detected by surveillance duplex ultrasound scanning or arteriography some time after repair. RESULTS: The stenosis-free patency rates at 48 months for OS, CBA, and PTA were 74%, 62%, and 34%, respectively. PTA was associated with an increased risk of treatment failure compared with both OS (hazard ratio [HR], 3.9; P < .0001) and CBA (HR, 3.1; P < .0001). There was no significant difference between OS and CBA (HR, 1.3 for CBA vs OS, P = .6). Pseudoaneurysms developed in two CBA patients. One ruptured and required interposition graft, and one was monitored. CONCLUSION: Cutting balloon angioplasty is a reasonable, initial treatment for infrainguinal vein graft stenosis in most patients. It is a safe, minimally invasive, outpatient procedure with patency rates that are comparable to OS and superior to PTA.